People Campaign, 1956-1975 by Battsetseg

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

People Campaign, 1956-1975 by Battsetseg BUILDING BRIDGES ACROSS CULTURES: A CASE STUDY OF THE PEOPLE-TO- PEOPLE CAMPAIGN, 1956-1975 BY BATTSETSEG SERJ Submitted to the graduate degree program in the Department of American Studies and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Co-Chairperson Theodore A. Wilson Co-Chairperson Sherrie J. Tucker Sheyda Jahanbani Megan Greene Brian Donovan Date Defended: May 27, 2014 i The Dissertation Committee for Battsetseg Serj certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: BUILDING BRIDGES ACROSS CULTURES: A CASE STUDY OF THE PEOPLE-TO- PEOPLE CAMPAIGN, 1956-1975 Co-Chairperson Theodore A. Wilson Co-Chairperson Sherrie J. Tucker Date approved: May 27, 2014 ii Abstract This study traces origins, operation, successes and failures of the People-to-People program featured during the second term of the Eisenhower presidency. The program was a product of and a reaction to the Cold War international conflicts that emanated from diametrically opposed ideologies of democracies and the communist world. U.S. claims to the superiority of democracy over communism were rooted in immediate post-war America’s quest for world leadership. The People-to-People campaign was a government-backed popular movement, which spread in the 1950s and expanded into the 1960s. It was partially coordinated and partially funded by the United States Information Agency during its first few years, with the expectation that it would attract private as well as grassroots support once it was launched. This dissertation explores People-to-People’s various programs and projects including the Sister- Cities and the University chapter as models for secular voluntary movements of ordinary citizens who were committed to improving mutual understanding between peoples from different cultures. The idealistic nature of people-to-people diplomacy, along with a wide variety of personal and social stakes associated with international travel and relations, made the People- to-People University program one of the most popular student organizations on college campuses in the 1960s. People-to-People’s popularity and ideals at that time attracted young Americans and provided them with both the opportunity and the enthusiasm to interact with foreign peoples at the grassroots level. It also gave them a sense of belonging to a broader, constructive human network, which promoted an appreciation of diverse cultures and a way to contribute to building the “bonds of solidarity” among people of many nations during the contested period of the Cold War. 1 Acknowledgments I am grateful for the following institutions, without whose financial support this work would not have been completed: The Fulbright Program, the Mongolian Government, PEO International, and the Soros Foundation. I would like to express my gratitude to the Department of East Asian Languages and Cultures, the Department of American Studies, and the Environmental Studies Program for giving me the opportunity to work as a teaching and research assistant. I owe a special debt to the Center for East Asian Studies, which so generously supported my research for several years through teaching opportunities and grants. This dissertation has heavily depended on archival sources, so many thanks to the archivists at the Eisenhower Presidential Library and the University of Kansas Archives at the Kenneth Spencer Research Library. This dissertation is based on oral histories and I would like to acknowledge the former volunteers of the People-to-People University program for their willingness to participate in my interviews: David M. Hann, Dale Sprague, Halley Kampschroeder, Jerry Gardner, Trisha Pitts, and Tommye Sexton. My advisors at the University of Kansas, Professor Theodore Wilson and Sherrie Tucker deserve special thanks for their invaluable intellectual guidance and support. They patiently responded to my ill-timed emails and were willing to accommodate me for many appointments. Also special thanks to Professor Sheyda Jahanbani for providing critical insights on people-to-people diplomacy. I am very grateful to Professor Megan Greene for her inestimable support throughout my studies at the University of Kansas. Finally, I thank my family who gave me the much-needed emotional support during my research. 2 Table of Contents Abstract………………………………………………………………………………. 1 Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………. 2 Chapter one: Introduction…………………………………………………………... 4 Chapter two: Prelude to People’s Diplomacy in Postwar America……………..39 Chapter three: The People-to-People Movement, 1956-1966………………..103 Chapter four: The People-to-People University Program, 1961-1975……….149 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………….182 Bibliography………………………………………………………………………...188 Appendices………………………………………………………………………….209 3 Chapter One. Introduction Winning Hearts and Minds as Historical Experience The idea of winning hearts and minds of a global audience was a crucial part of America’s grand strategies during the Cold War era. But this idea was far from new. In a letter penned to James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, then American Ambassador to France recounted: “You see I am an enthusiast on the subject of the arts. But it is an enthusiasm of which I am not ashamed, as its object is to improve the taste of my countrymen, to increase their reputation, to reconcile to them the respect of the world and procure them its praise.”1 Jefferson’s enthusiasm for the role and influence of culture was inherently related to America’s mission of being a role model for the rest of the world, which was manifested in the vision of its earlier settlers. As early in 1630, John Winthrop emphasized that his Puritan community “shall be a “city upon a hill, the eyes of all people upon us.” Assumptions of the idealization of America became a policy priority by the late nineteenth century. The diplomatic historian Emily Rosenberg contended that late nineteenth and early twentieth century cultural and economic relations embodied a fundamental condition of a national interest and international betterment.2 It is rather complicated to define the interrelationships between diplomacy and the outreach initiatives undertaken by ordinary individuals in conducting international relations. According to the public diplomacy scholar Jan Melissen, in recent years non- 1Letter dated 20 September 1785 was quoted in Cynthia P. Schneider, “Culture Communicates: U.S. Diplomacy That Works,” in The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations, ed. Jan Melissen (New York: Palgrave, 2007), 147. 2 Emily S. Rosenberg, Spreading the American Dream: American Economic and Cultural Expansion 1890-1945 (New York: Hill& Wang, 1982), 230. 4 state actors “have turned out to be extremely agile and capable of mobilizing support at a speed that is daunting for rather more unwieldy foreign policy bureaucracies.”3 The increasingly active role of ordinary individuals in the practice of public diplomacy was especially visible during the Cold War era. However, the first effort to disseminate American ideals at the institutional level was Woodrow Wilson’s initiative to create the Committee of Public Information in 1917 after the United States relinquished its claim of neutrality and was drawn into global conflict. By appointing his long-term friend and a former newspaperman George Creel as head of the committee, Wilson placed a strong emphasis on the upcoming operations that would conceivably counteract against the propaganda of the Central Powers. Wilson’s emphasis served as a crucial boost for the fledgling committee. Creel stressed that “the fight for the minds of men as of almost equal significance to victories or defeats in the muddy trenches of the Western Front.”4 Although Creel’s committee actions successfully influenced the positive construction of America’s overseas image throughout the war, it was attacked at home and ultimately was abolished by Congress in 1919.5 It is interesting to note, however, that while government-led information programs were labeled as “psychological approaches” or “propaganda,” educational and cultural exchanges were characterized by such terms as “cooperative,” mutually 3 Jan Melissen, “The New Public Diplomacy: Between Theory and Practice,” in The New Public Diplomacy” Soft Power in International Relations, ed. Jan Melissen (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), 24. 4Quoted in Robert Elder, The Information Machine: The United States Information Agency and American Foreign Policy (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1968), 34. 5 Richard Pells, Not Like Us: How Europeans Have Loved, Hated, and Transformed American Culture Since World War II (New York: Basic Books, 1997), 8. 5 understanding,” and “reciprocal.” Accordingly, there was a contested congressional debate that insisted the two be kept separate.6 Ultimately, in 1939, along with Franklin D. Roosevelt’s “good neighbor policy,” a division of cultural relations was created within the State Department. The Division was responsible for a variety of government-backed activities, including exchanges of students and teachers, book translations, and cultural broadcasting programs in Latin America. A year after the Division’s creation, the Office of Cooperation for Inter-American Affairs headed by Nelson Rockefeller was established. Roosevelt’s policy toward the newly established office was to encourage Rockefeller to “freewheel” his office “beyond the State Department’s cautious constraints.”7 The government’s
Recommended publications
  • University of Oklahoma Libraries Western History Collections Ralph
    University of Oklahoma Libraries Western History Collections Ralph H. Records Collection Records, Ralph Hayden. Papers, 1871–1968. 2 feet. Professor. Magazine and journal articles (1946–1968) regarding historiography, along with a typewritten manuscript (1871–1899) by L. S. Records, entitled “The Recollections of a Cowboy of the Seventies and Eighties,” regarding the lives of cowboys and ranchers in frontier-era Kansas and in the Cherokee Strip of Oklahoma Territory, including a detailed account of Records’s participation in the land run of 1893. ___________________ Box 1 Folder 1: Beyond The American Revolutionary War, articles and excerpts from the following: Wilbur C. Abbott, Charles Francis Adams, Randolph Greenfields Adams, Charles M. Andrews, T. Jefferson Coolidge, Jr., Thomas Anburey, Clarence Walroth Alvord, C.E. Ayres, Robert E. Brown, Fred C. Bruhns, Charles A. Beard and Mary R. Beard, Benjamin Franklin, Carl Lotus Belcher, Henry Belcher, Adolph B. Benson, S.L. Blake, Charles Knowles Bolton, Catherine Drinker Bowen, Julian P. Boyd, Carl and Jessica Bridenbaugh, Sanborn C. Brown, William Hand Browne, Jane Bryce, Edmund C. Burnett, Alice M. Baldwin, Viola F. Barnes, Jacques Barzun, Carl Lotus Becker, Ruth Benedict, Charles Borgeaud, Crane Brinton, Roger Butterfield, Edwin L. Bynner, Carl Bridenbaugh Folder 2: Douglas Campbell, A.F. Pollard, G.G. Coulton, Clarence Edwin Carter, Harry J. Armen and Rexford G. Tugwell, Edward S. Corwin, R. Coupland, Earl of Cromer, Harr Alonzo Cushing, Marquis De Shastelluz, Zechariah Chafee, Jr. Mellen Chamberlain, Dora Mae Clark, Felix S. Cohen, Verner W. Crane, Thomas Carlyle, Thomas Cromwell, Arthur yon Cross, Nellis M. Crouso, Russell Davenport Wallace Evan Daview, Katherine B.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography [I] Dean Acheson, Present at the Creation: nry Years in the State Department (New York, 1969). An elegantly written account by Truman's last Secretary of State, who was the chief architect of containment. [2] G.M. Alexander, The Prelude to the Truman Doctrine: British Policy in Greece 1944-1947 (Oxford, 1982). The Truman Doctrine was the first overt expression ofAmerican support for Western security. This book examines the background of Britain's intervention in the Greek civil war. [3] Richard A. Asiano, American Defense Policy from Eisenhower to Kennedy: the Politics of Changing Military Requirements (Ohio, 1975). A comprehensive account ofthe vicissitudes ofAmerican defence policy from Sputnik to the presidential election of John F. Kennedy. [4] Gar Alperovitz, Atomic Diplomacy: Hiroshima and Potsdam (New York, 1965). A 'New Left' historian who believes that the atomic bomb was intended as much to blackmail the Soviet Union into making concessions as to serve as an instrument to defeat Japan. [5] Stephen E. Ambrose, Rise to Globalism: American Foreign Policy 193~1970 (Baltimore, 1970). A useful textbook by one of the leading historians of the Cold War. [6] Stephen E. Ambrose, Eisenhower: the President 1952-1969, vol. II (London, 1984). An account ofEisenhower's internal and foreign policy based on his letters and papers. This is a sympathetic approach to the President's achievements. [7] Stephen E. Ambrose, Nixon: 1913-1962 (New York, 1982). The first volume of a biography of Richard M. Nixon dealing with his earlier years as US Senator and Vice-President of the USA. It tries hard to be objective and to show that Nixon was not as black as he was painted by his contemporaries.
    [Show full text]
  • H-Diplo Review Essay
    H201-Diplo Review 8Essay H-Diplo H-Diplo Essay Editor: Diane Labrosse H-Diplo Essay No. 158 H-Diplo Web and Production Editor: George Fujii An H-Diplo Review Essay Published on 28 June 2018 Max Boot. The Road Not Taken: Edward Lansdale and the American Tragedy in Vietnam. New York: Liveright Publishing, 2018. ISBN: 978-0-87140-941-6 (hardcover, $35.00). URL: http://tiny.cc/E158 Reviewed by Jeffrey P. Kimball, Miami University, Professor Emeritus dward Lansdale (1908-1987) gave up his job with a California advertizing firm to serve as an intelligence officer in the Office of Strategic Services during World War II. Still with the agency after the war—now renamed the Central Intelligence Agency—he was assigned the role of adviser to the EPhilippine government in its fight to suppress the left-leaning Hukbalahap peasant guerrilla rebellion. The fundamental elements of Lansdale’s counter-guerrilla strategy included reform of the government, propaganda and ‘civic-action’ programs that addressed the peasantry’s concerns, black ops, psychological warfare, and the development of counter-guerrilla military units, tactics, and programs. Lansdale also played an important role in assisting reformist Ramon Magsaysay’s rise to the presidency of the Philippines. For Max Boot, the author of this mammoth 715-page book (including back matter), Lansdale’s counter-guerrilla methods in the Philippines constituted the “road” or strategy that the United States should later have followed in Vietnam– but did not. (In 1959, one of Lansdale’s colleagues, Sam Wilson, renamed and broadened the term ‘counter- guerrilla’ warfare as ‘counterinsurgency’ warfare [321-322].) Lansdale’s brief assignment to Indochina in 1953 as U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Items-In-American Association for the United Nations, 11 November 1963
    UN Secretariat Item Scan - Barcode - Record Title Page Date 15/05/2006 Time 10:05:32 AM S-0885-0001-08-00001 Expanded Number S-0885-0001 -08-00001 Title items-in-American Association for the United Nations, 11 November 1963 Date Created 11/11/1963 Record Type Archival Item Container S-0885-0001: Operational Files of the Secretary-General: U Thant: Speeches, Messages, Statements, and Addresses - not issued as press releases Print Name of Person Submit Image Signature of Person Submit CR.13 (4-59) ROUTING SLIP Comments for the record should not be written on this slip. REFERRAL SHEET PT.108 should be used instead. TO: : APPROVAL >*? VOUR INFORMATION MAY WE CONFER? AS REQUESTED YOUR SIGNATURE FOR ACTION NOTE AND FILE REPLY FOR MY SIGNATURE NOTE AND RETURN PREPARE DRAFT YOUR COMMENTS ATTACH RELATED PAPERS CHINESE NEWS SERVICE An 1270 Sixth Avenue ft ^formation Agency Telephone: Circle 6-5240 New York 20, N. Y. of the Republic of China Cable Address: SINONEWS This material is fried with the Department of Justice, where the required registration statement of Chinese News Service under 56 Stat. 248-258 as an agency of the Government of the Republic of China is available for inspection. Registration does not indicate approval or disapproval of this material by the United States Government. p 01 a A FOR IM-ffiDIATE_RELEASE November 15, 1963 Taipei (Chinese News Service) — Commenting on U.N. Secretary-General U Thant's recent remarks on the Chinese Communists, Patrick Pichi Sun, spokesman of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of China,
    [Show full text]
  • The Foreign Service Journal, January 1977
    THE WEEK WE WENT TO WAR by Barton J. Bernstein THE UGLY AMERICAN REVISITED by Dino J. Caterini FOREIGN SERVICE JOURNAI JANUARY 197| 60 CENT % p f'1 4 "WM A I y l f H r * ML IlLV Diplomacy comes in all sizes* Ford’s 1977 diplomatic lineup comes in Mail us the coupon below and we’ll send full-car sizes like the Continental, Marquis you complete information on the Ford-built and LTD. Trimmer sizes like the new car of your choice—and how you can get Thunderbird, LTD H, Cougar and it at our special discount. What could be Cougar XR-7. Personal sizes like Mark V, more diplomatic? Granada and Monarch. Compact sizes like *Cannot be driven in the U.S. Comet, Maverick, Mustang n, Bobcat and Pinto. Pick the car that’s sized right for you, then check out the special diplomatic discount savings you can get on any 1977 Ford-built car or light truck. Delivery will be arranged for you, either stateside or overseas. And you can have the car built to Export* or Domestic specifications. Please send me full information on using my diplomatic discount to purchase a new WRITE TO: DIPLOMATIC SALES: FORD MOTOR COMPANY 815 Connecticut Ave. N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006/Tel: (202) 785-6047 NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE 1977 Granada Four-Door Ghia COUNTRY ZIP FORD EXPORT CORPORATION FOREIGN SERVICE JOURNAL American Foreign Service Association JANUARY 1977: Volume 54, No. 1 Officers and Members of the Governing Board PATRICIA WOODRING, President LARS HYDLE, Vice President CHARLOTTE CROMER, Second Vice President USIA: A Counter Proposal FRANK CUMMINS, Secretary GUNTHER K.
    [Show full text]
  • America's Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb on Japan Joseph H
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2007 America's decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan Joseph H. Paulin Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Paulin, Joseph H., "America's decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan" (2007). LSU Master's Theses. 3079. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/3079 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AMERICA’S DECISION TO DROP THE ATOMIC BOMB ON JAPAN A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Liberal Arts in The Inter-Departmental Program in Liberal Arts By Joseph H. Paulin B.A., Kent State University, 1994 May 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT……………………………………………………...………………...…….iii CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION……………………………………...………………….1 CHAPTER 2. JAPANESE RESISTANCE………………………………..…………...…5 CHAPTER 3. AMERICA’S OPTIONS IN DEFEATING THE JAPANESE EMPIRE...18 CHAPTER 4. THE DEBATE……………………………………………………………38 CHAPTER 5. THE DECISION………………………………………………………….49 CHAPTER 6. CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………..64 REFERENCES.………………………………………………………………………….68 VITA……………………………………………………………………………………..70 ii ABSTRACT During the time President Truman authorized the use of the atomic bomb against Japan, the United States was preparing to invade the Japanese homeland. The brutality and the suicidal defenses of the Japanese military had shown American planners that there was plenty of fight left in a supposedly defeated enemy.
    [Show full text]
  • Killing Hope U.S
    Killing Hope U.S. Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II – Part I William Blum Zed Books London Killing Hope was first published outside of North America by Zed Books Ltd, 7 Cynthia Street, London NI 9JF, UK in 2003. Second impression, 2004 Printed by Gopsons Papers Limited, Noida, India w w w.zedbooks .demon .co .uk Published in South Africa by Spearhead, a division of New Africa Books, PO Box 23408, Claremont 7735 This is a wholly revised, extended and updated edition of a book originally published under the title The CIA: A Forgotten History (Zed Books, 1986) Copyright © William Blum 2003 The right of William Blum to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Cover design by Andrew Corbett ISBN 1 84277 368 2 hb ISBN 1 84277 369 0 pb Spearhead ISBN 0 86486 560 0 pb 2 Contents PART I Introduction 6 1. China 1945 to 1960s: Was Mao Tse-tung just paranoid? 20 2. Italy 1947-1948: Free elections, Hollywood style 27 3. Greece 1947 to early 1950s: From cradle of democracy to client state 33 4. The Philippines 1940s and 1950s: America's oldest colony 38 5. Korea 1945-1953: Was it all that it appeared to be? 44 6. Albania 1949-1953: The proper English spy 54 7. Eastern Europe 1948-1956: Operation Splinter Factor 56 8. Germany 1950s: Everything from juvenile delinquency to terrorism 60 9. Iran 1953: Making it safe for the King of Kings 63 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Plaza: the Exchange Rate Stabilization Attempts of 1925, 1933, 1936 and 1971
    Working Paper Before the Plaza: The Exchange Rate Stabilization Attempts of 1925, 1933, 1936 and 1971 Barry Eichengreen, Ph.D. George C. Pardee and Helen N. Pardee Professor of Economics and Political Science, University of California, Berkeley © 2015 by the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy of Rice University This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy. Wherever feasible, papers are reviewed by outside experts before they are released. However, the research and views expressed in this paper are those of the individual researcher(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy. This paper is a work in progress and has not been submitted for editorial review. 1. Introduction The Plaza Accord is controversial.1 One the one hand it is hailed as “perhaps the high- water mark of international economic co-operation over the past 40 years” (in the words of Beattie 2010). On the other it is impugned as having had little effect on currency values, as heightening instability rather than reducing it (by causing the dollar to overshoot in the opposite direction), and even as having been indirectly responsible for the Japanese crisis and lost decade (as recounted if not exactly endorsed in IMF 2011). Exchange rate stabilization negotiations and agreements are always controversial. They are economically complex and politically fraught, since rhetoric is easy to offer while commitments are difficult to keep. They tap into deep-seated beliefs about whether markets produce desirable equilibria and, if not, whether intervention can improve observed outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Algis Valiunas
    VOLUME XII, NUMBER 1, WINTER 2011/12 A Journal of Political Thought and Statesmanship Algis David Valiunas: Pryce-Jones: David Foster Christopher Wallace Hitchens, RIP Colin Dueck: Michael How Nelson: Wars End Soldiers & Citizens Martha Bayles: Edward China Targets Feser: Hollywood Scientism’s Folly Robert P. George: Bradley Conservative C.S. Blitz Watson: e Law Diana School Racket Schaub: Malcolm X In Memoriam: Harold W. Rood PRICE: $6.95 IN CANADA: $6.95 mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Essay by Michael Nelson Soldiers and Citizens his year marks the 50th anniversa- Truman’s removal of Douglas MacArthur (a government, MacArthur pressed Truman for ry of two best-selling Cold War thrillers, real-life charismatic general) from command of permission to invade. In March 1951, after the Teach playing on growing public concern allied forces in the Korean War—and the ensu- president refused, the general wrote a letter to that civilian authorities would lose control ing political firestorm—were barely a decade old. House Republican leader Joe Martin praising a of the military. In Fail-Safe, Eugene Burdick In hindsight, everything about the contro- speech in which Martin argued that Chiang’s and Harvey Wheeler based their fictional versy, which has received its best treatment in army should be unleashed to create “a second president’s loss of control on a combination of Michael D. Pearlman’s Truman and MacAr- front on China’s mainland.” Martin released technical failure and military Standard Oper- thur: Policy, Politics, and the Hunger for Honor the letter and Truman fired MacArthur, a ating Procedures (SOP). The technical failure and Renown (2008), seems unlikely.
    [Show full text]
  • 301 MAKALE 01 Kilinc.Qxd
    Keeping the Door Open at Lausanne Conference: The U.S. Open Door Policy in the Near East during 1920’s Aykut K›l›nç University of New Hampshire ÖZET Birinci Dünya Savafl›’ ndan sonra Amerika Birleflik Devletleri Ortado¤u’da Aç›k Kap› politikas› uygulad›. Türk kurtulufl mücadelesi veren liderler de bu politikan›n beklenmedik savunucusu oldular. 1922 ve 1923 y›llar›nda Lozan Konferans› sürerken Ankara Hükûmeti Amerika’l› Chester grubuna Mu- sul ve cevresindeki yeralt› kaynaklar›n› doksan-dokuz y›l kullanma imtiyaz›n› verdi. Bu sayede Anka- ra Hükûmeti Musul üzerinde egemenlik hakk› kurma amac›n› güttü. Buna karfl›l›k olarak da Amerikan Hükûmeti oluflmakta olan yeni Türkiye’nin tam ba¤›ms›zl›k talebini Lozan Konferans›’ nda destekle- di. Yeni Türk hükümeti Amerika’n›n Ac›k Kap› politikas›n› Avrupa emperyalizminden daha hazmedi- lebilir buldu. Bu yüzden Amerika’n›n Ortado¤u Aç›k Kap› politikas› bölgede zor kullanarak de¤il, tam tersine Avrupa emperyalizminden çekinen Ankara Hükûmeti’nin iste¤i ve deste¤iyle uyguland›. Anka- ra Hükûmeti tam siyasal ba¤›ms›zl›k kazanmak u¤runa Amerika’ya ekonomik imtiyaz vermeye gönül- lüydü. ANAHTAR KEL‹MELER Lozan Konferans›, Amerika Birleflik Devletleri, Chester ‹mtiyaz›, Ortado¤u, Aç›k Kap› politikas›, Musul ABSTRACT The United States vigorously promoted an Open Door policy in the Near East in the aftermath of World War I. The Turkish nationalists who were fighting for independence became an unlikely ally of this policy. During the Lausanne Conference in 1922 and 1923 the nationalist government in Ankara granted the Chester concessions which permitted the United States to exploit the mineral resources in and around Mosul.
    [Show full text]
  • Fearey, Robert A
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project ROBERT A. FEAREY Interviewed by: Self Initial interview date: 1991 Copyright 1998 ADST TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Born and raised in New York Harvard University Entered the Foreign Service in 1942 Tokyo, Japan; Private Secretary to US Ambassador 1941-1942 Ambassador Joseph C. Grew Embassy Staff Environment Duties Proposal for Roosevelt-Konoye Talks 1941 Japan-China issue Problem of venue Washington does not approve meeting proposal US demands to Japan re China US embargo and economic pressure Japan attacks Pearl Harbor 12/9/1941 Japanese “War Declaration” Note Contents describing relationship and obligations Burning of codes and papers Embassy operations during internment 1941-1942 Food and supplies rationing Local employees Sports Environment Doolittle raid Grew’s report of Konoyo talks proposal 1942 Japan’s obligations and commitments 1 US and Allies commitments Future of Manchuria Departure aboard the Asama Maru and Gripsholm 1942 Voyage to New York Welcome home 1942 Grew’s meeting with Secretary of State Hull 1942 Hull’s reaction to Grew’s Konoyo Talks Report Search for “lost” Talks Report 1970s/1980s Grew’s “Pearl Harbor: From the Perspective of Ten Years 1952 Turbulent Era – Volume II The Road to Pearl Harbor , by Herbert Feis Fearey’s conclusions re Konoye’s proposed meeting with Roosevelt US should have agreed to the meeting It could have produced agreement Grew’s views Prince Fumimaro Konoye’s views Possible Roosevelt views re inevitability of war with Germany Tokyo; Special Assistant to Political Advisor to General MacArthur 1945 Report: “Trial and Punishment of Japanese War Criminals” Arrest of Japanese designated “war criminals” Arrest and suicide of Konoye Konoye’s final message Addendum; Letter from Ambassador Joseph C.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Art Imitates Life: Edward G. Landsdale and the Fiction of Vietnam
    Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture ISSN: 1983-4675 [email protected] Universidade Estadual de Maringá Brasil Burns, Tom Art imitates life: Edward G. Landsdale and the fiction of Vietnam Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture, vol. 31, núm. 1, 2009, pp. 95-102 Universidade Estadual de Maringá .jpg, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=307426641003 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative DOI: 10.4025/actascilangcult.v31i1.6435 Art imitates life: Edward G. Landsdale and the fiction of Vietnam Tom Burns Programa de Pós Graduação em Letras: Estudos Literários, Faculdade de Letras, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Antonio Carlos, 6627, 31.560-420, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. This article examines the adaptation of an historical person, the Air-Force officer and CIA operative named Edward G. Landsdale, as a model for fictional characters in three novels – English, American, and French – dealing with the early years of the American involvement in Vietnam. Landsdale’s political career and the historical background of his contribution to the creation of the anti-Communist state of South Vietnam is outlined, followed by an examination of his fictionalization in Graham Greene’s The Quiet American (1955), Eugene Burdick and William J. Lederer’s The Ugly American (1958), and Jean Lartéguy’s Yellow Fever (Eng. Transl. 1965). It is seen that Greene’s model is disputed, while all three novels actually underestimate Landsdale’s historical importance.
    [Show full text]