DOCSLIB.ORG

World Bank Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
World Bank Document Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: 68009-LAC PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT ON PROPOSED CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 6.5 MILLION (US$ 10 MILLION EQUIVALENT) TO GRENADA CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 3.9 MILLION Public Disclosure Authorized (US$ 6 MILLION EQUIVALENT) TO SAINT LUCIA CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 3.9 MILLION (US$ 6 MILLION EQUIVALENT) TO SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES REGIONAL GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 2 MILLION (US$ 3 MILLION EQUIVALENT) TO CARIBBEAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS UNION PROJECT IN SUPPORT OF THE FIRST PHASE (APL 1A) OF THE CARIBBEAN REGIONAL Public Disclosure Authorized COMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM April 24, 2012 Transport, Water and ICT Department Caribbean Country Management Unit Latin America and the Caribbean Region This document is being made publicly available prior to Board consideration. This does not imply a presumed outcome. The document may be updated following Board consideration and the updated document will be made publicly available in accordance with the World Bank policy on Access to Information. Public Disclosure Authorized CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective February 29, 2012) Currency Unit = SDR 1.55602 = US$1 US$ = SDR 1 FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ACS Association of Caribbean States BP Bank Procedures BPO Business Process Offshoring CARIFORUM The Caribbean Forum CARICOM Caribbean Community CAS Country Assistance Strategy CCI Centros de Capacitación en Informática CCL Computer Center Ltd. CD Country Disbursement CDB Caribbean Development Bank CED Center for Enterprise Development CIDA Canadian International Development Agency CKLN The Caribbean Knowledge Network CMMI Capability Maturity Model Integration CNSIC Comisión Nacional para la Sociedad de la Información y el Conocimiento CPS Country Partnership Strategy CSME CARICOM Single Market Economy CTU Caribbean Telecommunications Union ECCB Eastern Caribbean Central Bank ECDL European Computer Driving License ECTEL Eastern Caribbean Telecommunications Authority EDF European Development Fund E-ID Electronic Identification EIRR Economic Internal Rate of Return EPIC Entrepreneurship Program for Innovation in the Caribbean FDI Foreign Direct Investment FDT Fondo de Desarrollo de las Telecomunicaciones Gbps Gigabit per Second GIDC Grenada Investment Development Corporation GSM Global System for Mobile Communication HDI Human Development Index IBRD International Bank for Reconstruction and ii Development ICT Information and Communication Technologies IDA International Development Association IDB International Development Bank IEG Independent Evaluation Group IFC International Finance Corporation IFMIS Integrated Financial Management Information Systems INDOTEL Instituto Dominicano de las Telecomunicaciones INFOTEP Instituto de Formación Técnico Profesional en República Dominicana INTOSAI International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions IT Information Technology ITES Information Technology Enabled Services ITLA Instituto Tecnológico de las Américas ITU International Telecommunication Union IXP Internet Exchange Point Mb Megabyte MIGA Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency Mbps Megabit per second NPV Net Present Value NTRC National Telecommunications Regulatory Commission OAS Organization of American States OD Operational Directives OECS Organization of Eastern Caribbean States OFID OPEC Fund for International Development OP/BP Operation Policies/Bank Procedures PPP Public Private Partnership PSIPMU Public Sector Investment Programme Management Unit QAG Quality Assurance Group RGSM Regional Government Securities Market SDR Special Drawing Rights SEMCAR Support for Economic Management in the Caribbean SFLAC Spanish Fund for Latin America and the Caribbean SMART Specific, Measureable, Achievable, Relevant, Timebound SME Small and Medium Enterprise SPV Special Purpose Vehicle UAS Universal Access Fund UNDB United Nations Development Business UNDP United Nations Development Program VPN Virtual Private Network WBG World Bank Group iii Regional Vice President: Hasan Tuluy Country Director: Françoise Clottes Sector Director: Jose Luis Irigoyen Acting Sector Manager: Juan Navas Sabater Task Team Leader: Mavis Ampah iv CARIBBEAN REGION Caribbean Regional Communications Infrastructure Program APL 1A (CARCIP) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. STRATEGIC CONTEXT .................................................................................................1 A. Regional Context .......................................................................................................... 1 B. Sectoral and Institutional Context ................................................................................. 3 C. Higher Level Objectives to which the Program Contributes ........................................ 7 II. PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES ..............................................................8 A. Program Development Objective and Phases ............................................................... 8 Project Beneficiaries ........................................................................................................... 8 PDO Level Results Indicators ............................................................................................. 8 III. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................9 A. Program Components.................................................................................................... 9 B. Program Financing ...................................................................................................... 11 Lending Instrument ........................................................................................................... 11 Project Cost and Financing ............................................................................................... 14 C. Lessons Learned and Reflected in the Project Design ................................................ 15 IV. IMPLEMENTATION .....................................................................................................17 A. Institutional and Implementation Arrangements ........................................................ 17 B. Results Monitoring and Evaluation ............................................................................ 18 C. Sustainability............................................................................................................... 18 V. KEY RISKS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ..........................................................19 A. Risk Ratings Summary Table ..................................................................................... 19 B. Overall Risk Rating Explanation ................................................................................ 19 VI. APPRAISAL SUMMARY ..............................................................................................19 A. Economic and Financial Analyses .............................................................................. 19 B. Technical ..................................................................................................................... 20 C. Financial Management ................................................................................................ 21 D. Procurement ................................................................................................................ 21 v E. Environment (including Safeguards) .......................................................................... 22 F. Social (including Safeguards) ..................................................................................... 22 Annex 1: Results Framework and Monitoring .........................................................................24 Annex 2: Detailed Program Description ....................................................................................29 Annex 3: Implementation Arrangements ..................................................................................36 Annex 4: Operational Risk Assessment Framework (ORAF) .................................................45 Annex 5: Implementation Support Plan ....................................................................................51 Annex 6: Team Composition.......................................................................................................53 Annex 7: Economic Analysis .......................................................................................................54 Annex 8: Technical Annex for Regional Grant .........................................................................60 Annex 9: Technical Annex for Grenada CARCIP....................................................................82 Annex 10: Technical Annex for Saint Lucia CARCIP ...........................................................109 Annex 11: Technical Annex for Saint Vincent and the Grenadines CARCIP .....................139 vi PAD DATA SHEET Caribbean Regional Communications Infrastructure Program (APL 1A) PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT Latin America and the Caribbean Transport Water and Information and Communication Technologies Sector Date: April 24, 2012 Sector(s): Telecommunications (50%), Information Country Director: Françoise Clottes Technology (50%) Sector Director: Jose Luis Irigoyen Acting Sector Manager: Juan Navas Theme(s): Regional integration (30%), Regulation and Sabater competition policy (30%), Infrastructure services for private Team Leader(s): Mavis Ampah
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TABLE 7 - Trans-Ocean Fiber Optic Cable Capacity
    TABLE 7 - Trans-Ocean Fiber Optic Cable Capacity Table 7 - Continued - Construction cost sources: Cable Source Trans - Atlantic - Operational: TAT-8 98 FCC 2 nd 447 (1984) PTAT 100 FCC 2 nd 1036 (1985) TAT-9 4 FCC Rcd 1130 (1989) TAT-10 7 FCC Rcd 445 (1992) TAT-11 7 FCC Rcd 136 (1992) TAT-12/13 8 FCC Rcd 4811 (1993) CANTAT-3 www.athens.actinc.bc.ca/ACT/news.oct/cable.html, downloaded 3/10/1997. Columbus II Application, filed on November 10, 1992, File No. ITC-93-029. CANUS-1 n.a. Atlantic Crossing (AC-1) www.submarinesystems.com/tssl/newswire/netherlands.htm, downloaded 12/15/99. Gemini www.cwplc.com/press/1996/p96oct28.htm, downloaded 6/18/1998. Columbus III www.att.com/press/0298/980211.cia.html, downloaded 7/1/1998. Level 3 www.simplextech.com/news/pr990511.html, downloaded 12/01/1999. TAT-14 www.francetelecomna.com/nr/nr_prre/nr_prre_9-2-98_tat.htm, downloaded 12/14/1999. FLAG Atlantic - 1 www.flagatlantic.com/gts_and_flag_131099.htm, downloaded 12/14/1999. Hibernia Atlantic (formerly 360atlantic) www.worldwidefiber.com/html/news_14july1999.html, downloaded 11/29/1999. Tyco Atlantic n.a. Apollo www.techweb.com/wire/story/TWB20010112S0004, downloaded 10/15/2003. Americas - Operational: Americas I Application, filed on November 10, 1992, File No. ITC-93-030 TCS-1 5 FCC Rcd 101 (1990) Taino-Carb 7 FCC Rcd 4275 (1992) BAHAMAS II n.a. Antillas I n.a. Pan American Cable System www.twoten.press.net/stories/headlines/BUSINESS_mci_Cable.html, downloaded 2/27/98. Americas II www.investors.tycoint.com/news/19980302-5261.htm, downloaded 12/15/1999.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 26 May 2006  Submarine Telecoms Forum Is Published Bi-Monthly by WFN Strategies, L.L.C
    Regional Systems Issue 26 May 2006 Submarine Telecoms Forum is published bi-monthly by WFN Strategies, L.L.C. The publication may not be reproduced or transmitted in any form, in whole or in part, without the ExordiumWelcome to the May 2006, 26th issue of Submarine Telecoms Forum, our Regional permission of the publishers. Systems edition. Submarine Telecoms Forum is an independent com- mercial publication, serving as a freely accessible forum for My original Scuba diving certification was accomplished some 30 plus years ago, and professionals in industries connected with submarine optical it wasn’t until recently that I decided to upgrade it to the next level. Not that I had any fibre technologies and techniques. extra time to burn; but it just seemed like the right time to “confirm” the skills I had been Liability: while every care is taken in preparation of this using for all those years. Anybody can dive the tropics, but only the fanatical few dive a publication, the publishers cannot be held responsible for the frigid Virginia quarry in April. accuracy of the information herein, or any errors which may occur in advertising or editorial content, or any consequence We have, once again, some excellent articles for you, the fanatical few of the telecoms arising from any errors or omissions. industry. The publisher cannot be held responsible for any views Alan Robinson discusses SubOptic 2007, as well as the future of Apollo and Gemini expressed by contributors, and the editor reserves the right cable systems. Georges Krebs gives his view of the evolving submarine cable market, to edit any advertising or editorial material submitted for publication.
    [Show full text]
  • March 30, 2015 by ELECTRONIC FILING Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12Th Street, S.W. Washin
    (202) 223-7323 (202) 204-7371 [email protected] March 30, 2015 BY ELECTRONIC FILING Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: Joint Application for Transfer of Control of Cable Landing Licenses from Columbus Networks, Limited to Cable & Wireless Communications Plc, File Nos. SCL-T/C-20141121-00013 and SCL-T/C-20141121-00014; Applications for Transfer of Control of Section 214 Authorizations from Columbus Networks, Limited to Cable & Wireless Communications Plc, File Nos. ITC-T/C-20141121-00304 and ITC-T/C-20141121-00307 Dear Ms. Dortch: On Thursday, March 26, 2015, the undersigned counsel and representatives of Cable & Wireless Communications Plc (“C&W”) and Columbus Networks, Limited (“CNL”) met with members of the Commission’s staff to discuss the above-cited pending applications, and in particular Digicel’s pleadings and ex parte filing in the proceeding. Doc#: US1:9949275v3 Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary 2 Attending this meeting on behalf of Cable & Wireless Communications Plc were Belinda Bradbury, General Counsel, and Simeon Irvine, Chief Executive, Wholesale. C&W outside counsel Patrick Campbell and Diane Gaylor of Paul,Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP also attended. Attending on behalf of Columbus Networks, Limited were Paul Scott, President and Chief Operating Officer, Columbus Networks USA, Inc., and Victor A. Lago, Vice President of Legal Affairs, Columbus Networks USA, Inc. CNL outside counsel Ulises Pin of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP also attended. Commission staff in attendance were, from the International Bureau, Nese Guendelsberger, Deputy Bureau Chief (by phone); Kathleen Collins, Assistant Bureau Chief; Walt Strack, Assistant Bureau Chief and Chief Economist; Howard Griboff, Acting Division Chief, Policy Division; David Krech, Associate Division Chief, Policy Division; Mark Uretsky, Senior Economist, Policy Division; Jodi Cooper, Senior Attorney, Policy Division; and, from the Office of General Counsel, James Bird.
    [Show full text]
  • Forum Second Issue
    An international forum for the expression of ideas and First Quarter 2002 opinions pertaining to the submarine telecoms industry 1 Contents List of Advertisers Editors Exordium 3 Undersea Intelligence on the Costa del Sol International Cable Protection Committee 5 EMEA Conference 30 Emails to the Editor 4 Global Marine Systems Ltd 5,6 The State of the Industry Network Maintenance 5 Europe, the Middle East, Africa and India TMS International 16 Christian Annoque 31 Sub Tech 7 Offshore Site Investigation Conference 18 Tracking the Cableships Sub Tell 8 Latest locations of the world’s cableships 36 International Subsea & Telecom Services 22 Ventures 9 Technology in Long-span Smit-Oceaneering Cable Systems 29,39,47 Submarine Systems Vessels 10 CTC Marine Projects 35 Tony Frisch 40 Searching for a light in the fog A future for the submarine cable industry? Fibre Optics in Offshore Michael Ruddy 11 Communications Jon Seip 45 Bandwidth ORGANISING A The State of the Market Letter to a friend CON ERENCE? Rex Ramsden 19 Jean Devos 52 Give your exhibition or conference Countdown to Apollo Launch maximum exposure to the submarine Australasian Communications Conference The world’s most advanced cable system telecoms industry. Advertise your event in A once-only chance to hear from influential Katherine Edwards 23 Submarine Telecoms Forum strategists and CEOs 56 The State of the Industry and reach all the key people. The Americas Diary Dates Email: [email protected]@subtelforum.com John Manock 27 Upcoming Conferences 2002 57 2 An international forum for the expression of ideas and opinions pertaining to the submarine telecom industry Exordium Submarine Telecoms Forum is published quarterly by WFN Strategies, L.L.C.
    [Show full text]
  • ITU-Dstudygroups
    ITU-D Study Groups Study period 2018-2021 Broadband development and connectivity solutions for rural and Question 5/1 Telecommunications/ remote areas ICTs for rural and remote areas Executive summary This annual deliverable reviews major backbone telecommunication Annual deliverable infrastructure installation efforts and approaches to last-mile connectivity, 2019-2020 describes current trends in last-mile connectivity and policy interventions and recommended last-mile technologies for use in rural and remote areas, as well as in small island developing States (SIDS). Discussions and contributions made during a workshop on broadband development in rural areas, held in September 2019, have been included in this document, which concludes with two sets of high-level recommendations for regulators and policy-makers, and for operators to use as guidelines for connecting rural and remote communities. 1 More information on ITU-D study groups: E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: +41 22 730 5999 Web: www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/study-groups ITU -D Study Groups Contents Executive summary 1 Introduction 3 Trends in telecommunication/ICT backbone infrastructure 4 Last mile-connectivity 5 Trends in last-mile connectivity 6 Business regulatory models and policies 7 Recommendations and guidelines for regulators and policy-makers 8 Recommendations and guidelines for operators 9 Annex 1: Map of the global submarine cable network 11 Annex 2: Listing of submarine cables (A-Y) 12 2 More information on ITU-D study groups: E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: +41 22 730 5999 Web: www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/study-groups ITU -D Study Groups Introduction The telecommunications/ICT sector and technologies have evolved over a long period of time, starting with ancient communication systems such as drum beating and smoke signals to the electric telegraph, the fixed telephone, radio and television, transistors, video telephony and satellite.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the BUREAU of OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT U.S. DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR Washington, D.C
    Before the BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Washington, D.C. In the Matter of Request for Feedback on BOEM’s Proposed BOEM 2018-0018 Path Forward for Future Offshore Renewable Energy Leasing on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf COMMENTS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SUBMARINE CABLE ASSOCIATION Kent D. Bressie Susannah J. Larson HARRIS, WILTSHIRE & GRANNIS LLP 1919 M Street, N.W., Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20036-3537 +1 202 730 1337 tel Counsel for the North American Submarine Cable Association 5 July 2018 To protect submarine cable infrastructure critical to the U.S. economy and U.S. national security, the Bureau of Ocean and Energy Management (“BOEM”) should expressly account for existing and planned submarine cable systems in its development of a path forward for future renewable leasing offshore the United States Atlantic Coast. BOEM’s Office of Renewable Energy Programs (“OREP”) has already developed Guidelines for Information Requirements for a Renewable Energy Construction and Operations Plan (“COP Guidelines”), which directs renewable energy project developers to the North American Submarine Cable Association (“NASCA”) and its mapping resources as a first step in coordination. Because the COP Guidelines only come into play at the project planning phase, there is some limit to the protections such coordination can afford submarine cables. As BOEM performs a high-level assessment of factors to consider for lease locations on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf (“OCS”), NASCA urges BOEM to include factors that account for existing submarine cable infrastructure. Renewable energy projects on the Atlantic OCS pose significant risks to submarine cable infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL BUREAU REPORT 2013 Section 43.82 Circuit Status
    INTERNATIONAL BUREAU REPORT 2013 Section 43.82 Circuit Status Data July 2015 Cathy Hsu Policy Division 2013 Section 43.82 Circuit Status Data This report contains information on U.S. facilities-based international common carriers’ circuits as of December 31, 2013 that was submitted to the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) pursuant to section 43.82 of the Commission’s rules.1 For comparison purposes, this report also includes data from previous reports covering 2010 through 2012.2 Overall, the reported number of activated 64 kilobits per second (Kbps) equivalent circuits grew by 13 percent between 2012 and 2013. At year-end 2013, the reported number of activated 64 Kbps equivalent circuits totaled 43.8 million circuits as compared to 38.6 million circuits at year-end 2012. As explained below, this year’s report will be the last circuit status report issued under section 43.82.3 In 2013, the Commission released a Second Report and Order that significantly streamlined and modernized the Commission’s international circuit reporting requirements.4 Section 43.62, which went into effect on February 11, 2015, replaces section 43.82 circuit status reporting requirements.5 Circuit capacity data filed pursuant to section 43.62 for data as of December 31, 2014 were due by April 30, 2015 and will be the basis of next year’s report.6 1 47 C.F.R. § 43.82 (2014). See Annual International Circuit Status Reports Due on March 31, 2014; Carriers Continue to File Pursuant to Section 43.82, Public Notice, 29 FCC Rcd 1956 (Int’l Bur.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC NOTICE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 445 12Th STREET S.W
    PUBLIC NOTICE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 445 12th STREET S.W. WASHINGTON D.C. 20554 News media information 202-418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov (or ftp.fcc.gov) TTY (202) 418-2555 Report No. SCL-00210S Wednesday April 11, 2018 Streamlined Submarine Cable Landing License Applications Accepted For Filing Unless otherwise specified, the following procedures apply to the applications listed below: The applications listed below have been found, upon initial review, to be acceptable for filing and subject to the streamlined processing procedures set forth in section 1.767 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.767. Pursuant to the Submarine Cable Landing License Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 34-39, and Executive Order No. 10530, reprinted as amended in 3 U.S.C. § 301, each applicant seeks: (a) the grant of a cable landing licensee; (b) the modification of a cable landing license; and/or (c) the assignment or transfer of control of an interest in a submarine cable landing license. Pursuant to its decision in Review of Commission Consideration of Applications under the Cable Landing License Act, IB Docket No. 00-106, FCC 01-332, 16 FCC Rcd 22167 (2001) and section 1.767 of the rules, the Commission will take action upon these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Unleashing the Internet in the Caribbean Removing Barriers to Connectivity and Stimulating Better Access in the Region
    Unleashing the Internet in the Caribbean Removing Barriers to Connectivity and Stimulating Better Access in the Region February 2017 iStock.com/Claudiad By Bionda Fonseca-Hoeve, Michele Marius, Shernon Osepa, Jane Coffin, and Michael Kende Unleashing the Internet in the Caribbean – Stimulating Better Access in the Region 1 Table of Contents Letter from the President ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 2 Overview of the Caribbean .............................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report in PDF Format
    News media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov NEWSFederal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D. C. 20554 This is an unofficial announcement of Commission action. Release of the full text of a Commission order constitutes official action. See MCI v. FCC. 515 F 2d 385 (D.C. Circ 1974). FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: News Media contact: December 19, 2000 Rosemary Kimball at (202) 418-0500 INTERNATIONAL BUREAU RELEASES 1999 YEAR-END CIRCUIT STATUS REPORT FOR U.S. FACILITIES-BASED INTERNATIONAL CARRIERS, REFLECTING NEARLY DOUBLED TOTAL CAPACITY USED Washington, DC – The FCC International Bureau today released the 1999 year-end circuit status report, which reflects a continued shift from International Message Telephone Services (IMTS) to International Private Line usage. The report covers U.S. international facilities (undersea cables, satellites, and terrestrial links) and identifies the activated (in-service) and idle circuits for each international point as of December 31, 1999. The report also includes data from 1996 to 1998 for all international points by transmission facilities. The report indicates that the number of activated 64 Kbps equivalent circuits at year-end 1999 was 906,898, a 95% increase from 1998, the highest single year rate of growth of capacity used since the Commission began collecting such data in 1995. By service type, IMTS accounted for 34% of the total circuits used; International Private Line Services accounted for 62%; and the remaining 4% of total circuits were used for Video and other data services (outside of traditional private line services).
    [Show full text]
  • Comsic 2018-01
    2018 DEPLOIEMENT NexSIS pour les Départements d’Outre-Mer : Etat des lieux réseaux et téléphonie Etude des solutions techniques COMSIC 2018-01 Directeur de mémoire : M. Bruno FONTAINE Co-directeur de mémoire : Lieutenant-Colonel Marian VARYN Capitaine Frédéric AUDIFFRED Capitaine Thierry FALEME Capitaine Philippe GRIMAUD SDIS des Alpes-Maritimes SDIS de la Guadeloupe SDIS du Var REMERCIEMENTS Ce mémoire a été réalisé dans le cadre de l’enseignement dispensé par l’Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Officiers de Sapeurs-Pompiers (ENSOSP) au titre de la formation « Commandant des Systèmes d’Information et de Communication - COMSIC ». Nous tenons à exprimer toute notre gratitude : A l’ENSOSP pour nous avoir autorisé à proposer ce sujet dans le cadre du stage COMSIC ; A monsieur le Préfet Guillaume LAMBERT et au colonel Jean-Yves LAMBROUIN, pour nous avoir accompagné tout au long de notre réflexion ; A notre directeur de mémoire, Monsieur Bruno FONTAINE, pour ses conseils, son expertise et sa disponibilité ; A notre co-directeur de mémoire et référent COMSIC, le lieutenant-colonel Marian VARYN, pour son intérêt porté à notre mémoire et son expertise ; Au colonel Hervé PARIS, notre responsable pédagogique, pour ses conseils et sa passion du monde des SIC… Nous souhaitons également distinguer, pour leur accueil, leurs réflexions et leur disponibilité malgré leurs contraintes professionnelles : Monsieur Fabrice PAYET, adjoint au groupement SIC du SDIS de la Réunion ; Monsieur Seko LATIDINE, adjoint au groupement SIC du SDIS de la Guyane ;
    [Show full text]
  • Texte Der Serie Im Meer
    Unter der Oberfläche Im Meer 1 · © Sylvia Witt · Unter der Oberfläche · Im Meer Bioremediation "Der Mensch ist das einzige Lebewesen, das Vernunft besitzt. Aber kein anderes Lebewesen würde jemals so unvernünftig handeln." Friedensreich Hundertwasser "Die Natur kennt keine Probleme, nur Lösungen." Carl Amery Die Raupen der Galleria mellonella verdauen PE-Kunststoff. Jedes Jahr landen rund 6,4 Millionen Tonnen Kunststoff im Meer. Kunststoffpartikel sammeln sich zu Inseln aus Müll. Fast 300 Meerestierarten leiden unter dem Plastikmüll. Mägen von Meeresvögeln sind ein Indikator für den Grad der Verschmutzung. Plastik zersetzt sich nicht (bzw. angeblich innerhalb von 450 Jahren), es zerkleinert sich bis zur kompletten Zerreibung. Spätestens dann gelangt es in den Nahrungskreislauf. Es sei denn, die Natur hilft mit Bioremediation. Das Bakterium Ideonella sakaiensis 201-F6 baut den PET-Kunststoff ab. Es frisst und vermehrt sich spezifisch und hat sich erst in den letzten 70 Jahren entwickelt. Bakterien wie Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Oleispira antarctica und Alcanivorax borkumensis sind hydrocarbonoklastisch – sie bauen also Öl im Meer ab. Der Pilz Pestalotiopsis microspora frisst PUR-Kunststoff. Besonders häufiger Meermüll: Plastiktüten Plastiksixpacks PET-Flaschen Zahnbürsten Plastikmüll Schnüre Fischernetze Kulis Elektroschrott und Kabel Fleece-Stoff (ca. 2000 Fasern aus Kunststoffkleidung gelangen pro Waschgang ins Abwasser und können nicht von Klärwerken aufgehalten werden.) Polymerisate: Polyethylen (PE) Polypropylen (PP) Polybutadien Polstyrol (PS) Polyvinylchlorid (PVC) Polyacrylnitril (PAN) Polytetrafluorethen (PTFE) Polyacrylsäureester (PMCA) Polymethalcrylsäureester (PMMA) Polykondensate: Polyamid (PA) 2 · © Sylvia Witt · Unter der Oberfläche · Im Meer Polyester (PES, PET) Formaldehydharze Polyaddukte: Epoxidharze Polyurethane (PUR) Die Stoffwechselvorgänge sowie die dazu notwendigen Enzyme werden zur Zeit erforscht, um daraus konzentriert wirkende Wirkstoffe herzustellen, die den Kunststoffmüll im Meer in ungefährliche Bestandteile zerlegen sollen.
    [Show full text]