DOCSLIB.ORG

Soil Survey of the City of Chesapeake, Virginia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

United States In cooperation with Department of Virginia Department of Agriculture Conservation and Soil Survey of Recreation, Division of Soil Natural and Water Conservation; the City of Resources Virginia Dare Soil and Conservation Water Conservation Service District; Virginia Chesapeake, Polytechnic Institute and State University; Atlantic Division Naval Facilities Virginia Engineering Command; and the City of Chesapeake How To Use This Soil Survey The detailed soil maps can be useful in planning the use and management of small areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the Index to Map Sheets. Note the number of the map sheet and go to that sheet. Locate your area of interest on the map sheet. Note the map unit symbols that are in that area. Go to the Contents, which lists the map units by symbol and name and shows the page where each map unit is described. The Contents shows which table has data on a specific land use for each detailed soil map unit. Also see the Contents for sections of this publication that may address your specific needs. iii This soil survey is a publication of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Major fieldwork for this soil survey was completed in 2003. Soil names and descriptions were approved in 2004. Unless otherwise indicated, statements in this publication refer to conditions in the survey area in 2004. The most current official data are available at http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/. This survey was made cooperatively by the Natural Resources Conservation Service; the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Soil and Water Conservation; the Virginia Dare Soil and Water Conservation District; the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; the Atlantic Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command; and the City of Chesapeake. The survey is part of the technical assistance furnished to the Virginia Dare Soil and Water Conservation District. The City of Chesapeake and the Atlantic Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command provided financial assistance for the survey. Soil maps in this survey may be copied without permission. Enlargement of these maps, however, could cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping. If enlarged, maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, disability, or, where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, or political beliefs, as a means of reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call 800-795-3272 (voice) or 202-720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover: Baldcypress in a black water stream. An area of Dorovan-Belhaven complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently flooded, is in the background. Additional information about the Nation’s natural resources is available online from the Natural Resources Conservation Service at http://www.nrcs.usda.gov. iv Contents Cover .............................................................................................................................i How To Use This Soil Survey ..................................................................................... iii Contents...................................................................................................................... v Foreword ..................................................................................................................... ix Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 General Nature of the Survey Area .......................................................................... 1 How This Survey Was Made .................................................................................... 3 Detailed Soil Map Units ............................................................................................. 5 1—Acredale silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes ............................................................ 6 2—Acredale-Chapanoke complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes ........................................ 9 3—Acredale-Urban land complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes ....................................... 11 4—Acredale-Urban land-Chapanoke complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes.................... 12 5—Aquents, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently ponded .......................................... 14 6—Arapahoe mucky fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes ................................. 15 7—Arapahoe-Urban land complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes...................................... 17 8—Bojac loamy fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes ................................................... 18 9—Bojac-Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes ............................................ 20 10—Bojac-Urban land-Wando complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes .............................. 21 11—Chapanoke-Yeopim complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes ....................................... 23 12—Chesapeake sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes ............................................. 25 13—Chesapeake-Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes ............................... 27 14E—Conetoe-Chesapeake-Tetotum complex, 2 to 40 percent slopes ................. 28 15—Deloss mucky fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes .................................... 30 16—Deloss-Tomotley-Nimmo complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes ............................... 32 17—Deloss-Urban land complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes ........................................ 34 18—Dorovan-Belhaven complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently flooded .......... 36 19—Dragston fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes ........................................... 38 20—Dragston-Tomotley complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes ........................................ 39 21—Dragston-Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes..................................... 41 22—Dragston-Urban land-Tomotley complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes ..................... 42 23—Gertie silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes ............................................................ 44 24—Hyde mucky silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes .................................................. 46 25—Munden fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes ............................................. 48 26C—Munden loamy fine sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes........................................... 49 27—Munden-Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes ...................................... 51 28C—Munden-Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes.................................... 52 29—Munden-Urban land-Pactolus complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes ....................... 54 30—Nawney silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently flooded ........................... 56 31—Pactolus loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes ............................................ 57 32—Pasquotank silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes ................................................... 58 33—Pocaty mucky peat, 0 to 1 percent slopes, very frequently flooded ................ 60 34—Portsmouth mucky fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes ............................ 62 35C—Psamments, 0 to 10 percent slopes............................................................. 63 36—Pungo-Belhaven soils, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently ponded ................... 66 37—Rappahannock muck, 0 to 1 percent slopes, very frequently flooded ............ 67 v 38—Tetotum fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes ............................................. 69 39—Tetotum-Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes ...................................... 71 40—Tetotum-Urban land-Chesapeake complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes ................. 73 41—Tomotley fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes ............................................ 74 42—Tomotley-Bertie complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes ............................................. 77 43—Tomotley-Deloss complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes ........................................... 79 44—Tomotley-Deloss-Urban land complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes ......................... 81 45—Tomotley-Nimmo complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes ........................................... 83 46—Tomotley-Urban land complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes ..................................... 85 47—Tomotley-Urban land-Bertie complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes .......................... 87 48—Tomotley-Urban land-Nimmo complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes ........................ 89 49—Udorthents-Urban land complex, 0 to 45 percent slopes ............................... 90 50—Urban land, 0 to 5 percent slopes..................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Burial Mounds in Europe and Japan Comparative and Contextual Perspectives

    Burial Mounds in Europe and Japan Comparative and Contextual Perspectives

    Comparative and Global Perspectives on Japanese Archaeology Burial Mounds in Europe and Japan Comparative and Contextual Perspectives edited by Access Thomas Knopf, Werner Steinhaus and Shin’ya FUKUNAGAOpen Archaeopress Archaeopress Archaeology © Archaeopress and the authors, 2018. Archaeopress Publishing Ltd Summertown Pavilion 18-24 Middle Way Summertown Oxford OX2 7LG www.archaeopress.com ISBN 978 1 78969 007 1 ISBN 978 1 78969 008 8 (e-Pdf) © Archaeopress and the authors 2018 © All image rights are secured by the authors (Figures edited by Werner Steinhaus) Access Cover illustrations: Mori-shōgunzuka mounded tomb located in Chikuma-shi in Nagano prefecture, Japan, by Werner Steinhaus (above) Magdalenenberg burial mound at Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany,Open by Thomas Knopf (below) The printing of this book wasArchaeopress financed by the Sainsbury Institute for the Study of Japanese Arts and Cultures All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. Printed in England by Oxuniprint, Oxford This book is available direct from Archaeopress or from our website www.archaeopress.com © Archaeopress and the authors, 2018. Contents List of Figures .................................................................................................................................................................................... iii List of authors .................................................................................................................................................................................
  • James Albert Michener (1907-97): Educator, Textbook Editor, Journalist, Novelist, and Educational Philanthropist--An Imaginary Conversation

    James Albert Michener (1907-97): Educator, Textbook Editor, Journalist, Novelist, and Educational Philanthropist--An Imaginary Conversation

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 474 132 SO 033 912 AUTHOR Parker, Franklin; Parker, Betty TITLE James Albert Michener (1907-97): Educator, Textbook Editor, Journalist, Novelist, and Educational Philanthropist--An Imaginary Conversation. PUB DATE 2002-00-00 NOTE 18p.; Paper presented at Uplands Retirement Community (Pleasant Hill, TN, June 17, 2002). PUB TYPE Opinion Papers (120) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Authors; *Biographies; *Educational Background; Popular Culture; Primary Sources; Social Studies IDENTIFIERS *Conversation; Educators; Historical Research; *Michener (James A); Pennsylvania (Doylestown); Philanthropists ABSTRACT This paper presents an imaginary conversation between an interviewer and the novelist, James Michener (1907-1997). Starting with Michener's early life experiences in Doylestown (Pennsylvania), the conversation includes his family's poverty, his wanderings across the United States, and his reading at the local public library. The dialogue includes his education at Swarthmore College (Pennsylvania), St. Andrews University (Scotland), Colorado State University (Fort Collins, Colorado) where he became a social studies teacher, and Harvard (Cambridge, Massachusetts) where he pursued, but did not complete, a Ph.D. in education. Michener's experiences as a textbook editor at Macmillan Publishers and in the U.S. Navy during World War II are part of the discourse. The exchange elaborates on how Michener began to write fiction, focuses on his great success as a writer, and notes that he and his wife donated over $100 million to educational institutions over the years. Lists five selected works about James Michener and provides a year-by-year Internet search on the author.(BT) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document.
  • I. a Consideration of Tine and Labor Expenditurein the Constrijction Process at the Teotihuacan Pyramid of the Sun and the Pover

    I. a Consideration of Tine and Labor Expenditurein the Constrijction Process at the Teotihuacan Pyramid of the Sun and the Pover

    I. A CONSIDERATION OF TINE AND LABOR EXPENDITURE IN THE CONSTRIJCTION PROCESS AT THE TEOTIHUACAN PYRAMID OF THE SUN AND THE POVERTY POINT MOUND Stephen Aaberg and Jay Bonsignore 40 II. A CONSIDERATION OF TIME AND LABOR EXPENDITURE IN THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS AT THE TEOTIHUACAN PYRAMID OF THE SUN AND THE POVERTY POINT 14)UND Stephen Aaberg and Jay Bonsignore INTRODUCT ION In considering the subject of prehistoric earthmoving and the construction of monuments associated with it, there are many variables for which some sort of control must be achieved before any feasible demographic features related to the labor involved in such construction can be derived. Many of the variables that must be considered can be given support only through certain fundamental assumptions based upon observations of related extant phenomena. Many of these observations are contained in the ethnographic record of aboriginal cultures of the world whose activities and subsistence patterns are more closely related to the prehistoric cultures of a particular area. In other instances, support can be gathered from observations of current manual labor related to earth moving since the prehistoric constructions were accomplished manually by a human labor force. The material herein will present alternative ways of arriving at the represented phenomena. What is inherently important in considering these data is the element of cultural organization involved in such activities. One need only look at sites such as the Valley of the Kings and the great pyramids of Egypt, Teotihuacan, La Venta and Chichen Itza in Mexico, the Cahokia mound group in Illinois, and other such sites to realize that considerable time, effort and organization were required.
  • JAMES A. MICHENER Has Published More Than 30 Books

    JAMES A. MICHENER Has Published More Than 30 Books

    Bowdoin College Commencement 1992 One of America’s leading writers of historical fiction, JAMES A. MICHENER has published more than 30 books. His writing career began with the publication in 1947 of a book of interrelated stories titled Tales of the South Pacific, based upon his experiences in the U.S. Navy where he served on 49 different Pacific islands. The work won the 1947 Pulitzer Prize, and inspired one of the most popular Broadway musicals of all time, Rodgers and Hammerstein’s South Pacific, which won its own Pulitzer Prize. Michener’s first book set the course for his career, which would feature works about many cultures with emphasis on the relationships between different peoples and the need to overcome ignorance and prejudice. Random House has published Michener’s works on Japan (Sayonara), Hawaii (Hawaii), Spain (Iberia), Southeast Asia (The Voice of Asia), South Africa (The Covenant) and Poland (Poland), among others. Michener has also written a number of works about the United States, including Centennial, which became a television series, Chesapeake, and Texas. Since 1987, the prolific Michener has written five books, including Alaska and his most recent work, The Novel. His books have been issued in virtually every language in the world. Michener has also been involved in public service, beginning with an unsuccessful 1962 bid for Congress. From 1979 to 1983, he was a member of the Advisory Council to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, an experience which he used to write his 1982 novel Space. Between 1978 and 1987, he served on the committee that advises that U.S.
  • Burial Mounds & Cairns and the Development of Social Classes In

    Burial Mounds & Cairns and the Development of Social Classes In

    THE DEAD AND THE LIVING: Burial Mounds & Cairns and the Development of Social Classes in the Gulf of Georgia Region by BRIAN DAVID THOM B.A., The University of British Columbia, 1992 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of Anthropology and Sociology) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA July 1995 © Brian David Thorn, 1995 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree -i that permission for extensive copying of this thesis ~for scholarly purposes may be "granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. i i Department of i/l/W^r I Sccc^Y The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada Date DE-6 (2/88) 11 Abstract This thesis provides a model for understanding how social classes arose in the Gulf of Georgia area. This model distinguishes how social status in rank and a class societies are manifested and maintained in non-state, kin-based societies, drawing mainly from ethnographic descriptions. The relationship between the living and the dead for making status claims in both rank and class societies makes the archaeological study of mortuary ritual important for investigating these relationships.
  • Monks Mound—Center of the Universe? by John Mcclarey

    Monks Mound—Center of the Universe? by John Mcclarey

    GUEST ESSAY Monks Mound—Center of the universe? By John McClarey hyperbole or a facsimile? I think the case can be made that Monks Mound and the entire Alayout of this ancient metropolis in the H American Bottom near East St. Louis was a facsimile or model of Cahokia’s place in the cosmos, similar to the Black Hills as a “mirror or heaven” or the heart of all that is.” These are good metaphors to describe Cahokia’s center in the three-layer cake concept of the universe—the Underworld, the Earth, and the Sky. Cahokia by the 12th century B.C.E., was the place for people to connect with the spirits of this sacred sphere. In this article I will identify the sacred elements that made this place special to local and non-local populations and the role of the Birdman chiefs, priests, and shamans to interpret this unique place as a center in a larger world. Additionally, I identify the similarities of Cahokia as a a sacred place to other societies at different times and places. My fascination with Cahokia Mounds developed over a period of time with many visits from the early 1970s to the present. Briefly, Cahokia was the largest America city north of Mexico before the coming of the Europeans in the 15th cen- tury. It is believed that Cahokia was a political, religious, and economic center for perhaps as many as 500,000 Indians in the Mississippi Valley. It was a planned city with everything the world and in all religions, but the focus here is on the laid out on the cardinal points on the compass, Monks Cahokia Mounds in southern Illinois and cross culture Mound, the largest mound at the center, served as the official comparisons, Cahokia’s unique story includes the cruciform residence of the Great Sun god or Birdman deity.
  • JAM the Whole Chapter

    JAM the Whole Chapter

    INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ....................................................................................... 2 Introduction ................................................................................................... 3 The Man ...................................................................................................... 4-6 The Author ................................................................................................ 7-10 The Public Servant .................................................................................. 11-12 The Collector ........................................................................................... 13-14 The Philanthropist ....................................................................................... 15 The Legacy Lives ..................................................................................... 16-17 Bibliography ............................................................................................ 18-21 This guide was originally created to accompany the Explore Through the Art Door Curriculum Binder, Copyright 1997. James A. Michener Art Museum 138 South Pine Street Doylestown, PA 18901 www.MichenerArtMuseum.org www.LearnMichener.org 1 THE MAN THEME: “THE WORLD IS MY HOME” James A. Michener traveled to almost every corner of the world in search of stories, but he always called Doylestown, Pennsylvania his hometown. He was probably born in 1907 and was raised as the adopted son of widow Mabel Michener. Before he was thirteen,
  • Historic England – Prehistoric Barrows and Burial Mounds

    Historic England – Prehistoric Barrows and Burial Mounds

    Prehistoric Barrows and Burial Mounds Introductions to Heritage Assets Summary Historic England’s Introductions to Heritage Assets (IHAs) are accessible, authoritative, illustrated summaries of what we know about specific types of archaeological site, building, landscape or marine asset. Typically they deal with subjects which have previously lacked such a published summary, either because the literature is dauntingly voluminous, or alternatively where little has been written. Most often it is the latter, and many IHAs bring understanding of site or building types which are neglected or little understood. This IHA provides an introduction to prehistoric barrows and burial mounds - mounds of earth and/or stone of various shapes and sizes that are characteristic earthwork monuments of the prehistoric periods from about 5,800 until 3,400 years ago (3800-1400 BC). A small number are later, the practice ending around AD 800. While barrows are often isolated, many occur in groups, sometimes of just two or three, but occasionally of up to thirty or more. Groups of barrows are sometimes found in association with other monuments that are also often assumed to have served a ceremonial or ritual purpose during the Neolithic and Bronze Age. A list of in-depth sources on the topic is suggested for further reading. This document has been prepared by Dave Field and edited by Joe Flatman, Pete Herring and David McOmish. It is one of a series of 41 documents. This edition published by Historic England October 2018. All images © Historic England unless otherwise stated. Please refer to this document as: Historic England 2018 Prehistoric Barrows and Burial Mounds: Introductions to Heritage Assets.
  • Community of Tumulus (Organic Mound) Springs of the Swan Coastal Plain Interim Recovery Plan No

    Community of Tumulus (Organic Mound) Springs of the Swan Coastal Plain Interim Recovery Plan No

    INTERIM RECOVERY PLAN NO. 198 Assemblages of Organic Mound (Tumulus) Springs of the Swan Coastal Plain Recovery Plan Department of Environment and Conservation Species and Communities Branch, Kensington FOREWORD Interim Recovery Plans (IRPs) are developed within the framework laid down in Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM) Policy Statements Nos 44 and 50. Note: the Department of CALM formally became the Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) in July 2006. DEC will continue to adhere to these Policy Statements until they are revised and reissued. IRPs outline the recovery actions that are required to urgently address those threatening processes most affecting the ongoing survival of threatened taxa or ecological communities, and begin the recovery process. DEC is committed to ensuring that Critically Endangered ecological communities are conserved through the preparation and implementation of Recovery Plans (RPs) or Interim Recovery Plans (IRPs) and by ensuring that conservation action commences as soon as possible and always within one year of endorsement of that rank by the Minister. This Interim Recovery Plan replaces plan number 56, ‘Assemblages of Organic Mound (Tumulus) Springs of the Swan Coastal Plain’, Interim Recovery Plan 2000-2003, by V. English and J. Blyth. This Interim Recovery Plan will operate from January 2006 to December 2010 but will remain in force until withdrawn or replaced. It is intended that, if the ecological community is still ranked Critically Endangered, this IRP will be reviewed after five years. This IRP was given Regional approval on 14 December 2005 and was approved by the Director of Nature Conservation on 15 January 2006.
  • Anasazi (Pueblo Builders and Cliff Dwellers) Mound Builders

    Anasazi (Pueblo Builders and Cliff Dwellers) Mound Builders

    CK_3_TH_HG_P146_194.QXD 4/11/05 10:47 AM Page 153 Some of the Inuit of today live very much the way their ancestors did. For food, clothing, weapons, tools, and fuel, they rely on the fish they catch and the caribou, seals, whales, and walruses they hunt. In winter, the Inuit live in houses made of sod, wood, and stone, and in summer, they use tents made of animal skins. Igloos, shelters made of blocks of snow, are used only when the Inuit go on hunts and then only rarely. Kayaks and dog sleds are their means of transportation. Much of the Inuit reli- gion revolves around the sea and animals. The Inuit are noted for their carvings in soapstone, ivory, and bone, which often use characters from their religious lore. Anasazi (Pueblo Builders and Cliff Dwellers) By about 2,000 years ago, the Anasazi had settled in what is known today as the four corners area of the Southwest, that is, where Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, and Utah meet. Originally hunters and gatherers, the Anasazi turned to farming by around 1000 CE. Their crops were primarily maize (corn), beans, and squash. The first houses of the Anasazi were pithouses constructed below ground. By 1100 CE, however, the Anasazi were building cliff dwellings, multistoried stone apartment buildings with many rooms, set into mountainsides. By the late 1200s, for unknown reasons, the Anasazi began to abandon their cliff dwellings. Possible reasons include drought, disease, pressure from invading groups like the Apache, and internal dissension among villagers. Archaeologists have found no proof of any of these.
  • Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping Chesapeake Bay Watershed Acknowledgments

    Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping Chesapeake Bay Watershed Acknowledgments

    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping Chesapeake Bay Watershed Acknowledgments Contributors: Printing was made possible through the generous funding from Adkins Arboretum; Baltimore County Department of Environmental Protection and Resource Management; Chesapeake Bay Trust; Irvine Natural Science Center; Maryland Native Plant Society; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation; The Nature Conservancy, Maryland-DC Chapter; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Cape May Plant Materials Center; and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office. Reviewers: species included in this guide were reviewed by the following authorities regarding native range, appropriateness for use in individual states, and availability in the nursery trade: Rodney Bartgis, The Nature Conservancy, West Virginia. Ashton Berdine, The Nature Conservancy, West Virginia. Chris Firestone, Bureau of Forestry, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Chris Frye, State Botanist, Wildlife and Heritage Service, Maryland Department of Natural Resources. Mike Hollins, Sylva Native Nursery & Seed Co. William A. McAvoy, Delaware Natural Heritage Program, Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control. Mary Pat Rowan, Landscape Architect, Maryland Native Plant Society. Rod Simmons, Maryland Native Plant Society. Alison Sterling, Wildlife Resources Section, West Virginia Department of Natural Resources. Troy Weldy, Associate Botanist, New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Graphic Design and Layout: Laurie Hewitt, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office. Special thanks to: Volunteer Carole Jelich; Christopher F. Miller, Regional Plant Materials Specialist, Natural Resource Conservation Service; and R. Harrison Weigand, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Maryland Wildlife and Heritage Division for assistance throughout this project.
  • Our Club Bulletin

    Our Club Bulletin

    Rotary Club of Sydney Cove Club Bulletin #26 Tuesday, January 19, 2010 The Future of Rotary is in Your Hands Club Web Site Editor: David Goodliffe WELCOME TO... If you have any comments or questions, email the editor. ... OUR CLUB BULLETIN #26 Future Speakers for our meeting on January 22, 2010 Jan 22 2010 Shirley Owles "Polio: The $200m Challenge" Jan 29 2010 Professor Barry Allen "Treating Melanoma" Feb 5 2010 Professor Craig Anderson "Many Facets of International Health Research" Feb 26 2010 Prof Les White "Regatta Presentation" Upcoming Events PRESIDENT: GARY PRICE (on Xmas breakfast cruise) Treasurer: John Henderson Secretary & Admin: Peter Riordan International Committee See Home Page for all other Directors and for Meeting Time and Venue Meeting DISTRICT GOVERNOR: GLENN WRAN Jan 22 2010 Assistant Governor: Simon Knight Vocational Committee Meeting ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: DISTRICT 9750 Jan 22 2010 RI PRESIDENT: JOHN KENNY John & Jill Henderson Farewell Drinks CLUB BULLETIN EDITORIAL DETAILS: Submissions by 8.30am Tuesdays to: Jan 23 2010 David Goodliffe: mobile 0414-271-520, email [email protected] Australia Day Wheelchair Race Copy in word, photos and pictures in "jpg" files. Jan 26 2010 - Jan 26 2010 EDITORIAL TEAM: Meg Gervay, David Goodliffe, Bruce Hill, John Walker 50th Inaugural Luncheon www.sydneycoverotary.com Feb 1 2010 TEAMS & BIRTHDAYS: JAN 22 Indigenous Committee by David Goodliffe Meeting Feb 5 2010 Sounds of Sydney Committee THIS WEEK'S TEAM JAN 22 BIRTHDAYS Mtg Chair: David Brawn Feb 5 2010 - Feb 5 2010 Peter Riordan/Allan Blake Treasury Jan 16 Ingrid Orth Women in Rotary Robert Campbell/Suzanne Desk Jan 20 Sally Chantler Mar 17 2010 Campbell RCSC Golf Day Kieran Canavan International May 19 2010 Robert Cameron Welcoming Changeover Evening Meg Campbell-Dowling Vote of Thanks Jul 2 2010 tba Grace This eBulletin has been NEXT WEEK'S TEAM JAN 29 BIRTHDAYS generated by ClubRunner club communication software.