Sapinesuc Ubique Civis
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
BOOKLET OF ABSTRACTS Department of Classical Philology and Neo-Latin Studies Partners PROF DR ZOLTÁN GYENGE Dean, Patron of the Conference UNIVERSITY OF SZEGED FACULTY OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES 6722 Szeged, Egyetem u. 2 www.arts.u-szeged.hu SZEGEDÉRT ALAPÍTVÁNY 6720 Szeged, Klauzál tér 7. Fszt. 13. www.szegedertalapitvany.hu BÁNFFI & BÁNFFI KFT. 6725 Szeged, Földmíves u. 7. www.banffiszoda.hu SZEGED ÉS TÉRSÉGE TURISZTIKAI NONPROFIT KFT. 6723 Szeged, Széchenyi tér 12. www.szegedtourism.hu RÁDIÓ TAXI HÁROM www.radiotaxi-szeged.hu +36 62 480 480; +36 62 333 333 SESSION 1 ROMAN HISTORY WEDNESDAY, 2019. 08. 28, 11:50–13:30 Chair: Dr Andrei Y. Markelov BENEDIKT LAVRINČÍK Masaryk University, Brno (Czech Republic) WEDNESDAY, 2019. 08. 28, 11:50–12:10 The Pre-Caesarian Calendar – A Time Counting Theory This paper deals with issues of the Roman calendar before Caesar´s reform – a number of months, inercalatum, counting of winter months and legendary calendars of Romulus and Remus. Primarily, the research describes the issues from a religious view, but connections between political, war or vegetation affairs and the Roman calendar are also important. The paper is divided into three parts. The first part follows up and interprets ancient sources, as Livius or Macrobius, who informs us about the first Roman calendars. The next part acquaints us with a view of modern scholars, for example, Otto Ernest Hartmann, Joseph Dwight or Jörg Rüpke. We can say that Otto E. Hartmann was the first modern scholar who studied the Roman calendar. He formulated a theory of the ten months Roman calendar that was identical with a vegetation calendar. This calendar had 304 days and winter seasons included no months. This theory is accepted by most scientists during in the 20. and 21. century. But some scholars disagree with this theory, for example H. J. Rose and B. M. Allen. These scientists claim that the Roman calendar had to be based on the so-called full year (twelve months), because in winters there were too many matters to make (prepare to wars and to field works, purification rituals). The aim of the last part is how Romans counted months before the Caesar’s calendar reform. Because the modern scholars have different opinions, the paper identified issues of these opinions and then this research suggests a new solution. ADAM KUVIK Masaryk University, Brno (Czech Republic) WEDNESDAY, 2019. 08. 28, 12:10–12:30 Some Notes to the Dating of Justinian's Patriciate Flavius Petrus Sabbatius, better known as emperor Justinian the Great, was one of the most important early Byzantine rulers. For the past decades, his career has been of particular interest of historians and researchers and this research has produced exceptionally detailed picture of his whole reign. One still insufficiently answered question remains that of the dating of Justinian’s patriciate. Several attempts have been made in modern historiography to approximately determine the year during which Justinian had been granted the prestigious title of patricius, but all of them omit the importance of one key evidence found in the connection with the person and career of magister militum praesentalis Vitalianus. This paper, with regard to all the relevant primary sources and numerous modern studies which are devoted – at least partially – to this topic, proposes a new and more precise dating of the patriciate of Justinian in light of the circumstances surrounding the events of 520 and 521. FABRIZIO BIGLINO Royal Holloway, University of London (UK) WEDNESDAY, 2019. 08. 28, 12:30–12:50 Between Polybius and Marius: The Silent Revolution Polybius’ description of the Roman army in book VI of his Histories is considered the main reference regarding its structure and key mechanisms – such as recruitment, payment, etc – and it has become the de facto image of the mid- Republican Roman legions until the major changes introduced by the reforms attributed to Gaius Marius. However, there are several elements highlighting the fact that Polybius’ description actually depicts a rather outdated military system, making it hard to accept it as an up-to-date portrait of the army by the mid-second century BC. The Roman army, after all, had in its ability to constantly change one of its most striking characteristics and a key factor in its success. From the mid-third century BC, it started to experience important changes that will deeply affect its entire structure from the number of legions, the ratio between citizens and allies to the recruitment system. Despite their importance, these changes are not prominent in the literary sources, contrary to other well-known episodes. After all, as a result of this progressive transformation, the Roman army of the mid-second century BC not only is showing important differences from the one described by Polybius, but it was actually closer to the one traditionally attributed to Marius, thus questioning the overall prominence traditionally attributed to his reforms. By examining hints within the literary, archaeological and epigraphic evidence, this paper aims to proper highlight the major variations that interested the Roman military system from the mid-third century to the late second century BC. As a result, this will offer a better understanding of the impact of the army on Roman society during this crucial period. SHEANNA MARIA MURRAY La Sapienza University of Rome (Italy) WEDNESDAY, 2019. 08. 28, 12:50–13:10 Identities in Roman Macedonia: The Assimilation of the Roman and Macedonian Communities During the Early Imperial Period In recent years, the study of Roman Macedonia has gained considerable importance, particularly the subject of assimilation of the Roman and Macedonian communities. In this paper, I shall discuss this phenomenon that over a period of a few centuries led to these communities sharing a collective identity. Why did the Romans and the Macedonians integrate certain aspects of each other’s culture into their own but overlooked certain others? Did the extent of assimilation vary between the social classes? These are the questions I shall discuss. Most of the evidence that remains, pertains to the elite, but they cannot be considered representatives of the entire community. In order to get more comprehensive answers to the aforementioned questions, I have attempted to provide a synthesis which includes all social classes, by discussing the available epigraphic, numismatic and archaeological evidence. Due to the social changes that took place as a result of the Constitutio Antoniniana in 212 CE, I shall focus on the imperial period before the edict was issued. SESSION 2 LEGAL QUESTIONS WEDNESDAY, 2019. 08. 28, 15:00–16:15 Chair: Dr Imre Áron Illés PUNSARA AMARASINGHE Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa (Italy) Wednesday, 2019. 08. 28, 15:00–15:20. Influence of Stoic philosophy in carving Cicero’s notion on Jus Naturale: From legal philosophical perspective It may be not an exaggeration of facts to argue that real development of natural rights or natural law in Roman jurisprudence can be attributed to Cicero as his treaties on law and governance have been heavily influenced from Greek stoicism. Cicero’s fame as an orator has always upheld its reputation thorough out the centuries, but the philosophic contributions made by him have left a less concern as an influential thinker due to the fact that his ideas were essentially grounded on the basis of Greek thinkers mainly derived from Aristotle, Hellenist thinkers and Stoics. The multidisciplinary nature of Cicero’s writings has expanded his interests from oratory to stoicism and then to law, yet it allows the reader to grasp how his astute understanding provided philosophical analysis depending on the context. From dozens of his philosophic treaties the importance relating to natural law and Stoic influence upon it are primarily confined to three writings De Officiis, De Legibus and De Republica. However until his third writing Cicero has not explicitly defended his exact idea on natural law. Cicero was clearly aware of the dominant role of jus civile as the substantive legal force in Roman republic and the rights derived from nature had no normative bearing on civil law of the republic. The manner Cicero included natural law as a lively principle in practice was unique as he suggested the applicability of natural law in oratory as a convincing argument. As an example this principle was embodied in his writing on oratory De Inventione, where he believes view, the theory of Natural Law provides the orator with arguments that permit him to amplify the Civil Law and to compare it with non- juridical principles. Therefore, a strategy of argument based on Natural Law is particularly helpful when the speaker wants to persuade his hearers that a given act, although illegal, is nonetheless right. The much philosophic enrichment and erudition on natural law as inviolable principle was included in the writings in the later stage of life as an intellectual. The results of this paper will illustrate the gravity of Stoicism played in carving the legal acumen of Cicero as a statesman, orator and above all the most eminent legal philosopher in Roman history. FREDERIK GALAMBOSI Masaryk University, Brno (Czech Republic) Wednesday, 2019. 08. 28, 15:20–15:40 Roman names and their connection to Roman citizenship This paper focuses on the meaning behind Roman names and the changes in them connected to the Roman citizenship. In the first part of the paper the general meaning of Roman names and their parts will be discussed. The second part of the paper offers the look at the future research into the names taken by barbarians and the possible connection to the Roman citizenship. The new methods of the research will be mentioned, including prosopography. MAREK TODOROV Masaryk University, Brno (Czech Republic) Wednesday, 2019.