DOCSLIB.ORG

B COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 798/2008 of 8

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
B COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 798/2008 of 8 02008R0798 — EN — 15.02.2021 — 051.001 — 1 This text is meant purely as a documentation tool and has no legal effect. The Union's institutions do not assume any liability for its contents. The authentic versions of the relevant acts, including their preambles, are those published in the Official Journal of the European Union and available in EUR-Lex. Those official texts are directly accessible through the links embedded in this document ►B COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 798/2008 of 8 August 2008 laying down a list of third countries, territories, zones or compartments from which poultry and poultry products may be imported into and transit through the Community and the veterinary certification requirements (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ L 226, 23.8.2008, p. 1) Amended by: Official Journal No page date ►M1 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1291/2008 of 18 December 2008 L 340 22 19.12.2008 ►M2 Commission Regulation (EC) No 411/2009 of 18 May 2009 L 124 3 20.5.2009 ►M3 Commission Regulation (EU) No 215/2010 of 5 March 2010 L 76 1 23.3.2010 ►M4 Commission Regulation (EU) No 241/2010 of 8 March 2010 L 77 1 24.3.2010 ►M5 Commission Regulation (EU) No 254/2010 of 10 March 2010 L 80 1 26.3.2010 ►M6 Commission Regulation (EU) No 332/2010 of 22 April 2010 L 102 10 23.4.2010 ►M7 Commission Regulation (EU) No 925/2010 of 15 October 2010 L 272 1 16.10.2010 ►M8 amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 364/2011 of 13 L 100 30 14.4.2011 April 2011 ►M9 Commission Regulation (EU) No 955/2010 of 22 October 2010 L 279 3 23.10.2010 ►M10 amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 364/2011 of 13 L 100 30 14.4.2011 April 2011 ►M11 Commission Regulation (EU) No 364/2011 of 13 L 100 30 14.4.2011 April 2011 ►M12 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 427/2011 of 2 L 113 3 3.5.2011 May 2011 ►M13 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 536/2011 of 1 L 147 1 2.6.2011 June 2011 ►M14 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 991/2011 of 5 L 261 19 6.10.2011 October 2011 ►M15 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1132/2011 of 8 L 290 1 9.11.2011 November 2011 ►M16 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1380/2011 of 21 L 343 25 23.12.2011 December 2011 ►M17 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 110/2012 of 9 L 37 50 10.2.2012 February 2012 ►M18 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 393/2012 of 7 L 123 27 9.5.2012 May 2012 02008R0798 — EN — 15.02.2021 — 051.001 — 2 ►M19 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 532/2012 of 21 L 163 1 22.6.2012 June 2012 ►M20 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1162/2012 of 7 L 336 17 8.12.2012 December 2012 ►M21 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 88/2013 of 31 L 32 8 1.2.2013 January 2013 ►M22 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 191/2013 of 5 L 62 22 6.3.2013 March 2013 ►M23 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 437/2013 of 8 L 129 25 14.5.2013 May 2013 ►M24 Commission Regulation (EU) No 519/2013 of 21 February 2013 L 158 74 10.6.2013 ►M25 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 556/2013 of 14 L 164 13 18.6.2013 June 2013 ►M26 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 866/2013 of 9 L 241 4 10.9.2013 September 2013 ►M27 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1204/2013 of 25 L 316 6 27.11.2013 November 2013 ►M28 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 166/2014 of 17 L 54 2 22.2.2014 February 2014 ►M29 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 952/2014 of 4 L 273 1 13.9.2014 September 2014 ►M30 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/198 of 6 L 33 9 10.2.2015 February 2015 ►M31 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/243 of 13 L 41 5 17.2.2015 February 2015 ►M32 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/342 of 2 March 2015 L 60 31 4.3.2015 ►M33 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/526 of 27 L 84 30 28.3.2015 March 2015 ►M34 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/608 of 14 April 2015 L 101 1 18.4.2015 ►M35 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/796 of 21 May 2015 L 127 9 22.5.2015 ►M36 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/908 of 11 June 2015 L 148 11 13.6.2015 ►M37 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1153 of 14 July 2015 L 187 10 15.7.2015 ►M38 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1220 of 24 July 2015 L 197 1 25.7.2015 ►M39 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1349 of 3 August L 208 7 5.8.2015 2015 ►M40 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1363 of 6 August L 210 24 7.8.2015 2015 ►M41 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1884 of 20 October L 276 28 21.10.2015 2015 ►M42 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2258 of 4 December L 321 23 5.12.2015 2015 ►M43 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/15 of 7 January 2016 L 5 1 8.1.2016 ►M44 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/39 of 14 January L 11 3 16.1.2016 2016 ►M45 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/57 of 19 January L 13 49 20.1.2016 2016 ►M46 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/148 of 4 February L 30 17 5.2.2016 2016 02008R0798 — EN — 15.02.2021 — 051.001 — 3 ►M47 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/433 of 22 March L 76 29 23.3.2016 2016 ►M48 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/151 of 27 January L 23 7 28.1.2017 2017 ►M49 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/193 of 3 February L 31 13 4.2.2017 2017 ►M50 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/481 of 20 March L 75 15 21.3.2017 2017 ►M51 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1414 of 3 August L 203 4 4.8.2017 2017 ►M52 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1650 of 5 November L 275 10 6.11.2018 2018 ►M53 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/298 of 20 February L 50 20 21.2.2019 2019 ►M54 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1395 of 10 L 234 14 11.9.2019 September 2019 ►M55 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1872 of 7 November L 289 47 8.11.2019 2019 ►M56 Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/2124 of 10 October 2019 L 321 73 12.12.2019 ►M57 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/352 of 3 March 2020 L 65 4 4.3.2020 ►M58 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/393 of 11 March L 76 1 12.3.2020 2020 ►M59 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/544 of 20 April 2020 L 121I 1 20.4.2020 ►M60 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/626 of 7 May 2020 L 146 1 8.5.2020 ►M61 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1166 of 6 August L 258 11 7.8.2020 2020 ►M62 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1752 of 23 L 394 5 24.11.2020 November 2020 ►M63 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2083 of 14 L 423 20 15.12.2020 December 2020 ►M64 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2205 of 22 L 438 11 28.12.2020 December 2020 ►M65 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/24 of 13 January L 11 1 14.1.2021 2021 ►M66 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/130 of 3 February L 40 16 4.2.2021 2021 ►M67 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/169 of 11 February L 49 18 12.2.2021 2021 Corrected by: ►C1 Corrigendum, OJ L 124, 20.5.2010, p. 10 (215/2010) ►C2 Corrigendum, OJ L 147, 12.6.2015, p. 24 (2015/608) ►C3 Corrigendum, OJ L 326, 11.12.2015, p. 68 (2015/608) ►C4 Corrigendum, OJ L 326, 11.12.2015, p. 69 (2015/1884) 02008R0798 — EN — 15.02.2021 — 051.001 — 4 ▼B COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 798/2008 of 8 August 2008 laying down a list of third countries, territories, zones or compartments from which poultry and poultry products may be imported into and transit through the Community and the veterinary certification requirements (Text with EEA relevance) CHAPTER I SUBJECT MATTER, SCOPE AND DEFINITIONS Article 1 Subject matter and scope 1. This Regulation lays down veterinary certification requirements for imports into and transit, including storage during transit, through the Community of the following commodities (the commodities): (a) poultry, hatching eggs, day-old chicks and specified pathogen-free eggs; (b) meat, minced meat and mechanically separated meat of poultry, including ratites and wild game-birds, eggs and egg products. It lays down a list of third countries, territories, zones or compartments from which the commodities may be imported into the Community. 2. This Regulation shall not apply to poultry for exhibitions, shows or contests. 3. This Regulation shall apply without prejudice to specific certifi­ cation requirements provided for in Community agreements with third countries. Article 2 Definitions For the purposes of this Regulation, the following definitions shall apply: (1) ‘poultry’ means fowl, s, guinea fowl, ducks, geese, quails, pigeons, pheasants, partridges and ratites (ratitae), reared or kept in captivity for breeding, the production of meat or eggs for consumption, or for restocking supplies of game; (2) ‘hatching eggs’ means eggs for incubation, laid by poultry; (3) ‘day-old chicks’ means all poultry less than 72 hours old, not yet fed and muscovy ducks (Cairina moschata) or their crosses, less than 72 hours old whether or not fed; (4) ‘breeding poultry’ means poultry 72 hours old or more, intended for the production of hatching eggs; 02008R0798 — EN — 15.02.2021 — 051.001 — 5 ▼B (5) ‘productive poultry’ means poultry 72 hours old or more, reared for: (a) the production of meat and/or eggs for consumption; or (b) the restocking of supplies of game; (6) ‘specified pathogen-free eggs’ means hatching eggs which are derived from ‘chicken flocks free from specified pathogens’, as described in the European Pharmacopoeia (1 ), and which are intended solely for diagnostic, research or pharmaceutical use; (7) ‘meat’ means edible parts of the following animals: (a) poultry, which, when relating to meat, means farmed birds, including birds
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Anatolii P.Savkov Acting President of the National Academy for Public Administration Under the President of Ukraine
    Anatolii P.Savkov Acting President of the National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine BIOGRAPHY Born on 27 January 1957 in the village Mazurivka, Chernivtsi raion, Vinnytsia oblast. In 1999 graduated from the Odesa branch of the Ukrainian Academy of Public Administration under the President of Ukraine (nowadays – Odesa Regional Institute for Public Administration of the National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine), in 1982 – Veterinary Faculty of the Odesa Agricultural Institute. In 2010 finished the doctoral dissertation in the Odesa Regional Institute for Public Administration of the National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine. Doctor of Sciences in Public Administration (2011). Doctoral dissertation “Public administration of election process in Ukraine: theoretical and methodological principles” was defended at the Specialized Academic Council of the Institute of Legislation of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. In 2020 was awarded the rank of professor. By the Resolution of the President of Ukraine of 21 April 2015 №455/2015-рп was appointed to a position of the First Vice President of the National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine. By the Decree of the President of Ukraine of 5 April 2019 №106/2019 was temporarily assigned as the Acting President of the National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine. Held the positions in public authorities: Chief Consultant of the Methodical Work Division
    [Show full text]
  • Local and Regional Government in Ukraine and the Development of Cooperation Between Ukraine and the EU
    Local and regional government in Ukraine and the development of cooperation between Ukraine and the EU The report was written by the Aston Centre for Europe - Aston University. It does not represent the official views of the Committee of the Regions. More information on the European Union and the Committee of the Regions is available on the internet at http://www.europa.eu and http://www.cor.europa.eu respectively. Catalogue number: QG-31-12-226-EN-N ISBN: 978-92-895-0627-4 DOI: 10.2863/59575 © European Union, 2011 Partial reproduction is allowed, provided that the source is explicitly mentioned Table of Contents 1 PART ONE .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Overview of local and regional government in Ukraine ................................ 3 1.3 Ukraine’s constitutional/legal frameworks for local and regional government 7 1.4 Competences of local and regional authorities............................................... 9 1.5 Electoral democracy at the local and regional level .....................................11 1.6 The extent and nature of fiscal decentralisation in Ukraine .........................15 1.7 The extent and nature of territorial reform ...................................................19 1.8 The politics of Ukrainian administrative reform plans.................................21 1.8.1 Position of ruling government ..................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Persecution of the Czech Minority in Ukraine at the Time of the Great Purge1
    ARTICLES Persecution of the Czech Minority in Ukraine 8 Mečislav BORÁK at the Time of the Great Purge Persecution of the Czech Minority in Ukraine at the Time of the Great Purge1 prof. Mečislav BORÁK Abstract In its introduction, the study recalls the course of Czech emigration to Ukraine and the formation of the local Czech minority from the mid-19th century until the end of 1930s. Afterwards, it depicts the course of political persecution of the Czechs from the civil war to the mid-1930s and mentions the changes in Soviet national policy. It characterizes the course of the Great Purge in the years 1937–1938 on a national scale and its particularities in Ukraine, describes the genesis of the repressive mechanisms and their activities. In this context, it is focused on the NKVD’s national operations and the repression of the Czechs assigned to the Polish NKVD operation in the early spring of 1938. It analyses the illegal executions of more than 660 victims, which was roughly half of all Czechs and Czechoslovak citizens executed for political reasons in the former Soviet Union, both from time and territorial point of view, including the national or social-professional structure of the executed, roughly compared to Moscow. The general conclusions are illustrated on examples of repressive actions and their victims from the Kiev region, especially from Kiev, and Mykolajivka community, not far from the centre of the Vinnycko area, the most famous centre of Czech colonization in eastern Podolia. In detail, it analyses the most repressive action against the Czechs in Ukraine which took place in Zhytomyr where on 28 September 1938, eighty alleged conspirators were shot dead, including seventy-eight Czechs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bar of Ukraine
    SHADOW REPORT THE BAR OF UKRAINE: THE LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE EARLY YEARS OF SELF-GOVERNANCE AGENCY FOR LEGISLATIVE INITIATIVES KYIV, 2018 Compiling and presenting shadow analytical reports is part of a project implemented by the Agency for Legislative Initiatives, a non-governmental organization, under the USAID «RADA: Responsible Accountable Democratic Assembly» Program, which is implemented by the East Europe Foundation. The shadow report entitled «The Bar of Ukraine: the Lessons Learned from the Early Years of Self-Governance» was compiled by the Agency for Legislative Initiatives in cooperation with the Tomorrow’s Lawyer non-governmental organization at the request of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine Committee for Legal Policy and Justice in order to support the latter in administering its oversight function. The Agency for Legislative Initiatives aims to promote the strengthening of democratic values, the development of political culture and legal awareness, the scaling up of best international practices for effective government bodies to be built, and the development of Ukraine towards integrating with the European Union. While striving towards its mission, the Tomorrow’s Lawyer develops and implements training programs for lawyers to bolster their leadership in reform implementation, reinforce the legal community and strengthen the rule of law in Ukraine, and builds up and supports a viable professional network of opinion leaders among the bar who adhere to the values of fair justice, provide legal services of the highest ethical standards, and serve as effective agents of social transformations. The report is translated by Andrii Ishchenko CONTACT INFORMATION AGENCY FOR LEGISLATIVE INITIATIVES, a non-governmental organization Address: Nyzhniy Val st., 15, Office 303, 04071 Kyiv Tel.: +380 44 531 37 68 E-maіl: [email protected]іev.ua Web-page: www.parliament.org.ua SHADOW REPORT AGENCY FOR LEGISLATIVE INITIATIVES TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations .
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution of Ukraine
    Strasbourg, 13 March 2014 CDL-REF(2014)012 Eng.only Opinion 762 / 2014 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE Text provided by the Ukrainian authorities on 13 March 2014 This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int 2 CDL-REF(2014)012 CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE Amended by the Law of Ukraine № 2222-VI dated 08.12.2004, the Law № 2952-VI dated 01.02.2011, the Law № 586-VII dated 19.09.2013, and the Law № 742-VII dated 21.02.2014 The Law of Ukraine № 2222-VI dated 08.12.2004 is recognized as such that does not correspond to the Constitution of Ukraine (is unconstitutional), in accordance with the Decision the Constitutional Court of Ukraine № 20-рп/2010 dated 30.09.2010 due to infringement of the constitutional procedure of its consideration and adoption The provisions of the Constitution of Ukraine adopted at the fifth session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on 28.06.1996, with amendments and attachments, contributed by the Laws of Ukraine № 2222-VI dated 08.12.2004, № 2952-VI dated 01.02.2011, № 586-VII dated 19.09.2013, are recognized to be in force at the territory of Ukraine in accordance with the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine Decree № 750-VII dated 22.02.2014 The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, on behalf of the Ukrainian people - citizens of Ukraine of all ethnicities, expressing the sovereign will of the people, based on the centuries-old history of Ukrainian state-building and on the right to self- determination realized by the Ukrainian nation,
    [Show full text]
  • The Conflict Over the Autocephaly of Ukrainian Orthodoxy As an Element of the Hybrid War, „Rocznik Instytutu Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej” 18(2020), Z
    T. Szyszlak, The conflict over the autocephaly of Ukrainian Orthodoxy as an element of the hybrid war, „Rocznik Instytutu Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej” 18(2020), z. 3, s. 49-71, DOI: https://doi.org/10.36874/RIESW.2020.3.3. Tomasz Szyszlak* The conflict over the autocephaly of Ukrainian Orthodoxy as an element of the hybrid war Konflikt wokół autokefalii ukraińskiego prawosławia jako element wojny hybrydowej Abstract: The issue of the autocephaly of Ukrainian Orthodoxy has once again demonstrated that the concept of atheism and the fight against reli- gion propagated by the communists did not bring the expected results. On the contrary, religion has become a factor that connects societies in the re- publics of the former USSR with the former metropolis, especially for Slavic and Orthodox populations. It should not come as a surprise, therefore, that the problem of the autocephaly of Ukrainian Orthodoxy has been exploited in the current Russian-Ukrainian dispute, described as a post-imperial hybrid war. The aim of this article is to show how both sides of the conflict are using the issue of the autocephaly of Ukrainian Orthodoxy. Keywords: Orthodox Church of Ukraine, autocephaly, tomos, post-imperial hybrid war, Russia, Ukraine Streszczenie: Kwestia autokefalii ukraińskiego prawosławia po raz kolejny pokazała, że propagowana przez komunistów koncepcja ateizmu i walki z religią nie przyniosła w perspektywie takich rezultatów, jakich oczekiwano. Odwrotnie – religia stała się czynnikiem integrującym społeczeństwa republik byłego ZSRR z dawną metropolią, a uwaga ta dotyczy zwłaszcza ludności sło- wiańskiej i prawosławnej. Nie powinno zatem dziwić, że problem autokefalii ukraińskiego prawosławia został wykorzystany w aktualnym sporze rosyjsko- -ukraińskim, określanym jako postimperialna wojna hybrydowa.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine: Country Perspective on C/S Rates
    UKRAINE’S EXPERIENCE WITH CAESAREAN SECTIONS: RATES AND INDICATIONS ccording to official statistics the Table 1. Contribution of each C/S indicator to the overall C/S rate in the Donetsk caesarean section (C/S) rate in Region, Ukraine, 2010 and 2012 (aggregated data from 44 maternities). Ukraine increased from 9.2% A Indications for C/S C/S rate by different indications in 1998 to 16.5% in 2012 (1), although according to per total number of deliveries and total C/S this varies across maternities and regions nationally agreed of the country. The Donetsk Region of protocol 2010 (n=41 253) 2012 (n=43 071) Ukraine, with a population of 4.7 million, % of all % of % of all % of has a C/S rate that is higher than the rest N deliveries all C/S N deliveries all C/S of the country. In 2010 there were 41235 deliveries in the Region, with a C/S rate Obstruction for vaginal 486 1.18 6.80 123 0.29 1.61 delivery (pelvic, tissue, of 17.3% and in 2012 there were 43071 tumor) deliveries and the CS rate was 17.7%. Although this C/S rate does not greatly Uterine scar 1559 3.78 21.80 1932 4.49 25.41 exceed the rates recommended by the (previous C/S) WHO of 10-15% (2), we felt that it was Placenta previa/ 595 1.44 8.32 542 1.26 7.13 important to understand the factors as- Placenta abruption sociated with C/S in the Region. Severe preeclampsia 388 0.95 5.43 322 0.75 4.23 Our study had 2 parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine Scenario 1) Background A. Donetsk and Luhansk Are Rebel
    Ukraine Scenario 1) Background a. Donetsk and Luhansk are rebel-held parts of Ukraine, and have been since 2014. The regions have ethnic Russian majorities and rebelled over attempts to ban Russian as an official language and curtail trade across the Russian border. Many of the rebels advocate secession. b. Ukraine’s state power company claimed the regions were some $431 million in debt over non- payment of bills. Russia says that they will be providing power through pre-existing lines effective immediately to avoid loss of electricity to some 3 million people in the effected areas. c. The decision by the Ukrainian government to cut power to the region appears to be an attempt to put pressure on the secessionist movement, though ironically by forcing them to turn to Russia for electricity, they may further enhance the region’s link to the Russian Federation. Source: “Russia to Supply Electricity to Eastern Ukraine After Kiev Cuts Power: Ukraine Says Regions Weren't Paying Their Bills,” Jason Ditz, Posted on April 25, Anti-War.com website: https://news.antiwar.com 2) Context a. Areas in Eastern Ukraine (Donbas Region) have had power cut by pro-Ukrainian (Kiev Government) groups that control the highest capacity power generation stations in the country. These are the 4 operational nuclear power stations in western Ukraine which includes the Zaporizhia Nuclear Power Station, the largest nuclear power plant in Europe generating 6,000 MW. This leaves the Russian controlled areas with a small number of lower capacity coal generation facilities to power the Donbas region with additional power provided by Russian power plants to support the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Serhii Plokhy Mapping the Great Famine One of the Most Insightful
    Serhii Plokhy Mapping the Great Famine One of the most insightful and moving eyewitness accounts of the Holodomor, or the Great Ukrainian Famine of 1932–33, was written by Oleksandra Radchenko, a teacher in the Kharkiv region of Ukraine. In her diary, which was confiscated by Stalin’s secret police and landed the author in the Gulag for ten long years, the 36-year-old teacher recorded not only what she saw around her but also what she thought about the tragedy unfolding before her eyes. “I am so afraid of hunger; I’m afraid for the children,” wrote Radchenko, who had three young daughters, in February 1932. “May God protect us and have mercy on us. It would not be so offensive if it were due to a bad harvest, but they have taken away the grain and created an artificial famine.” That year she wrote about the starvation and suffering of her neighbors and acquaintances but recorded no deaths from hunger. It all changed in January 1933, when she encountered the first corpse of a famine victim on the road leading to her home. By the spring of 1933, she was regularly reporting mass deaths from starvation. “People are dying,” wrote Radchenko in her entry for May 16, 1933, “…they say that whole villages have died in southern Ukraine.”1 Was Radchenko’s story unique? Did people all over Ukraine indeed suffer from starvation in 1932 and then start dying en masse in 1933? Which areas of Ukraine were most affected? Was there a north-south divide, as the diary suggests, and, if so, did people suffer (and die) more in the south than in the north? Were there more deaths in the villages than in towns and cities? Were small towns affected? Did ethnicity matter? These are the core questions that Mapa, the Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute’s Digital Map of Ukraine Project is attempting to answer by developing a Geographic Information System (GIS)-based Digital Atlas of the Holodomor.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Journal L 256 of the European Union
    Official Journal L 256 of the European Union Volume 64 English edition Legislation 19 July 2021 Contents II Non-legislative acts INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS ★ Council Decision (EU) 2021/1172 of 18 June 2021 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement with Respect to Time Limitations on Arrangements for the Provision of Aircraft with Crew between the European Union, the United States of America, Iceland, and the Kingdom of Norway . 1 REGULATIONS ★ Council Regulation (EU) 2021/1173 of 13 July 2021 on establishing the European High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1488 . 3 ★ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1174 of 12 July 2021 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications ‘Asparago di Badoere’ (PGI) . 52 ★ Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/1175 of 16 July 2021 amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the use of polyols in certain energy-reduced confectionery products (1) . 53 ★ Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/1176 of 16 July 2021 amending Annexes III, V, VII and IX to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards genotyping of positive TSE cases in goats, the determination of age in ovine and caprine animals, the measures applicable in a herd or flock with atypical scrapie and the conditions for imports of products of bovine, ovine and caprine origin (1) . 56 ★ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1177 of 16 July 2021 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/408 as regards the deletion of propoxycarbazone from the list of active substances to be considered as candidates for substitution (1) .
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution of Ukraine
    CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE Adopted at the Fifth Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on June 28, 1996 Amended by the Laws of Ukraine № 2222-IV dated December 8, 2004, № 2952-VI dated February 1, 2011, № 586-VII dated September 19, 2013, № 742-VII dated February 21, 2014, № 1401-VIII dated June 2, 2016 № 2680-VIII dated February 7, 2019 The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, on behalf of the Ukrainian people - citizens of Ukraine of all nationalities, expressing the sovereign will of the people, based on the centuries-old history of Ukrainian state-building and on the right to self-determination realised by the Ukrainian nation, all the Ukrainian people, providing for the guarantee of human rights and freedoms and of the worthy conditions of human life, caring for the strengthening of civil harmony on Ukrainian soil, and confirming the European identity of the Ukrainian people and the irreversibility of the European and Euro-Atlantic course of Ukraine, striving to develop and strengthen a democratic, social, law-based state, aware of responsibility before God, our own conscience, past, present and future generations, guided by the Act of Declaration of the Independence of Ukraine of August 24, 1991, approved by the national vote on December 1, 1991, adopts this Constitution - the Fundamental Law of Ukraine. Chapter I General Principles Article 1 Ukraine is a sovereign and independent, democratic, social, law-based state. Article 2 The sovereignty of Ukraine extends throughout its entire territory. Ukraine is a unitary state. The territory of Ukraine within its present border is indivisible and inviolable. Article 3 The human being, his or her life and health, honour and dignity, inviolability and security are recognised in Ukraine as the highest social value.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Evaluation of Participatory Budgeting in Ukraine
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337783495 Impact Evaluation of Participatory Budgeting in Ukraine Research · December 2019 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11468.36485 CITATIONS READS 0 229 2 authors, including: Dmytro Khutkyy University of California, Riverside 16 PUBLICATIONS 19 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Dmytro Khutkyy on 06 December 2019. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Impact Evaluation of Participatory Budgeting in Ukraine Dmytro Khutkyy, Kristina Avramchenko Kyiv 2019 Reference Khutkyy, D., & Avramchenko, K. (2019). Impact Evaluation of Participatory Budgeting in Ukraine. Kyiv. Authors Dmytro Khutkyy, PhD in Sociology, independent expert www.khutkyy.com, [email protected] Kristina Avramchenko, independent expert [email protected] Acknowledgements Reviewing Kateryna Borysenko, Product Manager, Tech NGO “SocialBoost” Oleksandra Ivanenko, Business Analyst, Tech NGO “SocialBoost” Serhii Karelin, E-democracy Component Coordinator, the Swiss-Ukrainian program E-Governance for Accountability and Participation (EGAP) Kostiantyn Ploskyi, PhD in Public Administration, Deputy Director, Polish-Ukrainian Cooperation Foun- dation PAUCI Proofreading Orysia Hrudka Design Denys Averyanov Funding This research has been conducted with the support of the Open Society Foundations. All thoughts, conclusions and recommendations belong to the authors of this publication and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the project donor. Copyright Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Contents Summary 4 1. Introduction 6 1.1 National context 6 1.2 Impact model 7 1.3 Research methodology 12 2. The overall impact of participatory budgeting in Ukraine 15 2.1 Participatory budgeting trends 15 2.2 The factors of participatory budgeting impact 18 3.
    [Show full text]