DOCSLIB.ORG

Inventory (Chapter 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

VR545 Concordia NDB V 532 Blosser Osborne Clay Center IR504 Moritz Meml. VR511 Clay Center NDB RILEY MOA IR505 ADA WEST MOA ADA EAST MOA V 551 V 307 R-3602A VR531 V 553 Manhattan VR545 VOR-DME Minneapolis R-3602B Manhattan City Co. Regional V 4 Lucas Marshall AAF Freeman V 4 VR544 V 4-508 VR531 IR504 Salina VORTAC Cavalry NDB Abilene V 307 V 244-508 Fort Riley VOR-DME VR545 Ellsworth VR512VR5 VR531VR5 12 Herington Regional SMOKY HIGH 31 BISON MOA R-3601A IR5MOA05 VR544 VR532 VR531 SALINA REGIONAL AIRPORT IR513 Herington NDB V 532 33 VR552 VR533VR5 V 77-280 IR513 VR534 IR526 CheyenneCheCheyy Bottoms VR119 WildlifeW Area McPherson VR511 V 261 VR138 Lyons-Rice Co. McPherson NDB Schroeder Marion V 77 VR152 VR535 Lyons NDB V 280 VR512 V 132-502132-502 VR536 VR534 V 73 Moundridge V 10-234-502 Newton City Co. VR512 Hutchinson IR526 V 132 V 10-132 Roberts Newton NDB V 12 HutchinsonVR 119VOR- DME LEGEND Airport with hard-surfaced runways Class D Airspace 1,500' to 8,069' in length Class E Airspace Airports with hard-surfaced runways Class E Airspace with floor greater than 8,069' or some multiple 700 ft. above surface runways less than 8,069' Victor Airways NORTH VORTAC Military Training Routes VOR-DME Compass Rose NOT TO SCALE VOR Wilderness Area Class B Airspace Prohibited, Restricted, Warning and Alert Areas Class C Airspace Military Operations Area (MOA) Non-directional Radiobeacon (NDB) Exhibit 1J Vicinity Airspace Restricted airspace R-3601A and R- positioned over isolated, rural areas to 3601B is located immediately southwest provide ground separation for any noise of the Class D airspace ring for SLN. This nuisance or potential accident debris. airspace has been established to support Each designated MOA appears on the rel- the mission of the Smoky Hill Air National evant sectional charts, along with its Guard bombing range. Smoky Hill ANG normal hours of operation, lower and up- Range is the largest of 15 bombing ranges per altitudes of operation, controlling au- in the Air National Guard. It is operated thority contact, and using agency. by the Kansas ANG, 184th Regional Sup- port Group of the 184th Intelligence Wing There are several MOAs within close at McConnell Air Force Base in Wichita, proximity of Salina Regional Airport. The Kansas. Smoky Hill ANG Range functions Smoky Hill MOA wraps around the south- to support US military combat flying units ern and western borders of Restricted of all the armed services in both the Ac- Airspace R-3601A then extends west and tive Component and the Reserve Compo- abuts the Bison MOA which continues to nent, to include the Air National Guard the west, as depicted on Exhibit 1J. To and Army National Guard. the north, northwest, and northeast of SLN are three designated MOAs: ADA Within the 34,000 acre installation is a West, ADA East, and Riley. 12,000 acre target area which includes dual conventional ranges and three large Military Training Routes: Military tactical ranges. The tactical ranges pro- training routes (MTR) are designated air- vide realistic air-to-ground training avail- space that has been generally established able for all types of military aircraft. for use by high performance military air- Smoky Hill also has four drop zones for craft to train below 10,000 feet AGL and cargo aircraft. The range can accommo- in excess of 250 knots. There are VR (vis- date a variety of military weapons and ual) and IR (instrument) designated munitions training, including the release MTRs. MTRs with no segment above of high altitude bombs. 1,500 feet AGL will be designated with the “VR” or “IR,” followed by a four digit R-3601A has a floor of the surface and ex- number (e.g., VR1520, IR 1521). MTRs tends up to 18,000 feet, while R-3601B with one or more segments above 1,500 continues from 18,000 feet, or FL 180, up feet AGL are identified by the route desig- to FL 230. The restricted airspace is in nation, followed by a three-digit number effect Monday through Saturday between (e.g., VR531). The arrows on the route 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Additional times show the direction of travel. There are can be added via Notice to Airmen numerous MTRs in close proximity to Sa- (NOTAM) alerts with at least six hours lina Regional Airport, as depicted on Ex- advance notice. hibit 1J. Military Operations Areas (MOA): An Victor Airways: For aircraft arriving or MOA is "airspace established outside departing the regional area using very Class A airspace to separate or segregate high frequency omni-directional range certain nonhazardous military activities (VOR) facilities, a system of Federal Air- from IFR Traffic and to identify for VFR ways, referred to as Victor Airways, has traffic where these activities are conduct- been established. Victor Airways are cor- ed." (14 CFR §1.1, U.S.A.) MOAs are often ridors of airspace eight miles wide that 1-21 extend upward from 1,200 feet AGL to pilots of properly equipped aircraft can 18,000 feet MSL and extend between translate into point-to-point guidance and ground-based VOR navigational facilities. position information. The types of elec- There are seven Victor Airways leading to tronic navigational aids available for air- and from the Salina VORTAC including V4, craft flying to or from Salina Regional V4-508, V244-508, V532, V551, V553, and Airport include a very high frequency V73. omni-directional range (VOR) facility and the global positioning system (GPS). All navigational aids at the airport are owned AIRSPACE CONTROL and maintained by the FAA. Salina Regional Airport has an ATCT, The VOR, in general, provides azimuth which is operated on a contract basis by a readings to pilots of properly equipped private contracting firm, Midwest Air aircraft transmitting a radio signal at eve- Traffic Control. The tower is open from ry degree to provide 360 individual navi- 7:00 a.m. until 11:00 p.m. daily. ATCT can gational courses. Frequently, distance be raised on the frequency 119.3 MHz or measuring equipment (DME) is combined 124.35 MHz while ground control is with a VOR facility (VOR-DME) to provide available on frequency 121.9 MHz. Tower distance as well as direction information personnel direct and separate aircraft to the pilot. Military tactical air naviga- movements in the airspace surrounding tion aids (TACANs) and civil VORs are the airport and on the ground. commonly combined to form a VORTAC. The VORTAC provides distance and direc- Approach and departure control is pro- tion information to both civil and military vided by the Kansas City region Air Route pilots. The Salina VORTAC is located ap- Traffic Control Center (ARTCC) on fre- proximately eight miles to the north of quency 134.9 MHz utilizing the Salina re- the airport. mote control air/ground (RCAG) commu- nication. RCAGs were established for the GPS is an additional navigational aid for express purpose of providing air-to- pilots. GPS was initially developed by the ground communications between air traf- United States Department of Defense for fic control specialists and pilots located at military navigation around the world. a remote airport for delivering en route GPS differs from a VOR, in that pilots are clearances, issuing departure authoriza- not required to navigate using a specific tions, and acknowledging instrument facility. GPS uses satellites placed in orbit flight rules cancellations or depar- around the earth to transmit electronic ture/landing times. As a secondary func- radio signals, which pilots of properly tion, they may be used for advisory pur- equipped aircraft use to determine alti- poses whenever the aircraft is below the tude, speed, and other navigational in- coverage of the primary air/ground fre- formation. With GPS, pilots can directly quency. navigate to any airport in the country and are not required to navigate to a specific ground-based navigation facility. NAVIGATIONAL AIDS Many commercial service airports are Navigational aids are electronic devices equipped with an Instrument Landing that transmit radio frequencies, which System (ILS). The ILS at SLN is comprised 1-22 of a localizer antenna, a glide slope an- proach procedures, including associated tenna, and a MALSR. Approaches utilizing weather minimums for Salina Regional the ILS can be completed when cloud ceil- Airport. ings are as low as 200 feet and visibility is down to ½-mile. Runway 35 at Salina Re- The most sophisticated instrument ap- gional Airport is equipped with an ILS ap- proach at Salina Regional Airport is the proach. ILS approach to Runway 35. The ILS Runway 35 approach provides visibility minimums as low as ½-mile and cloud INSTRUMENT APPROACH ceilings of 200 feet (referred to as a Cate- PROCEDURES gory I approach). Generally, this type of approach is considered the minimum for Instrument approach procedures are a a commercial service airport. Larger me- series of predetermined maneuvers es- dium and large hub airports will typically tablished by the FAA, using electronic have even more sophisticated instrument navigational aids that assist pilots in lo- approaches offering lower visibility min- cating and landing at an airport, especial- imums (Categories II and III). ly during instrument flight conditions. There are currently seven published in- Instrument approaches based on the strument approaches, including a preci- global positioning system (GPS) have be- sion ILS instrument approach, to Runway come very common across the country. 35 as previously noted. Precision instru- GPS is inexpensive, as it does not require ment approaches provide vertical descent a significant investment in ground based information and course guidance infor- systems by the airport or FAA.
Recommended publications
  • Constraints for STOL Operations in South Florida Conurbation Cedric Y

    Constraints for STOL Operations in South Florida Conurbation Cedric Y

    Constraints for STOL Operations in South Florida Conurbation Cedric Y. Justin June 2021 Based on research previously published: Development of a Methodology for Parametric Analysis of STOL Airpark Geo-Density, Robinson et al. AIAA AVIATION 2018 Door-to-Door Travel Time Comparative Assessment for Conventional Transportation Methods and Short Takeoff and Landing On Demand Mobility Concepts, Wei et al. AIAA AVIATION 2018 Wind and Obstacles Impact on Airpark Placement for STOL-based Sub-Urban Air Mobility, Somers et al., AIAA AVIATION 2019 Optimal Siting of Sub-Urban Air Mobility (sUAM) Ground Architectures using Network Flow Formulation, Venkatesh et al, AIAA AVIATION 2020 Comparative Assessment of STOL-based Sub-Urban Air Mobility Operations in Massachusetts and South Florida, Justin et al. AIAA AVIATION 2020 Current Market Segmentation ? VTOL CTOL CTOL CTOL CTOL Capacity ? 200-400+ pax Twin Aisle Are there 120-210 pax scenarios where Single Aisle an intermediate solution using 50-90 pax STOL vehicles and Regional Aircraft sitting in- Design range below 300 nm Commuters between UAM 9-50 pax Flight time below 1.5 hours Thin-Haul and thin-haul 9 to 50 seat capacity operations exists? 4-9 pax Sub-Urban Missions 50-150 nm Air Mobility 4 to 9 revenue-seats Missions below 50 nm Urban Air Mobility 1-4 pax 1 to 4 revenue-seats 50 nm 300 nm 500 nm 3000 nm 6000+ nm Artwork Credit Uber Design Range 2 Introduction • Population, urbanization, and congestion Atlanta, GA Miami, FL Dallas, TX Los Angeles, CA have increased steadily over the past several decades • Increasing delays damage the environment and substantially impact the economy Driving time: 8 min.
  • A Conceptual Design of a Short Takeoff and Landing Regional Jet Airliner

    A Conceptual Design of a Short Takeoff and Landing Regional Jet Airliner

    A Conceptual Design of a Short Takeoff and Landing Regional Jet Airliner Andrew S. Hahn 1 NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, 23681 Most jet airliner conceptual designs adhere to conventional takeoff and landing performance. Given this predominance, takeoff and landing performance has not been critical, since it has not been an active constraint in the design. Given that the demand for air travel is projected to increase dramatically, there is interest in operational concepts, such as Metroplex operations that seek to unload the major hub airports by using underutilized surrounding regional airports, as well as using underutilized runways at the major hub airports. Both of these operations require shorter takeoff and landing performance than is currently available for airliners of approximately 100-passenger capacity. This study examines the issues of modeling performance in this now critical flight regime as well as the impact of progressively reducing takeoff and landing field length requirements on the aircraft’s characteristics. Nomenclature CTOL = conventional takeoff and landing FAA = Federal Aviation Administration FAR = Federal Aviation Regulation RJ = regional jet STOL = short takeoff and landing UCD = three-dimensional Weissinger lifting line aerodynamics program I. Introduction EMAND for air travel over the next fifty to D seventy-five years has been projected to be as high as three times that of today. Given that the major airport hubs are already congested, and that the ability to increase capacity at these airports by building more full- size runways is limited, unconventional solutions are being considered to accommodate the projected increased demand. Two possible solutions being considered are: Metroplex operations, and using existing underutilized runways at the major hub airports.
  • United States Rocket Research and Development During World War II

    United States Rocket Research and Development During World War II

    United States Rocket Research and Development During World War II Unidentified U.S. Navy LSM(R) (Landing Ship Medium (Rocket)) launching barrage rockets during a drill late in the Second World War. Image courtesy of the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration. and jet-assisted takeoff (JATO) units for piston-pow- Over the course of the Second World War, rockets ered attack fighters and bombers. Wartime American evolved from scientific and technical curiosities into rocket research evolved along a number of similar and practical weapons with specific battlefield applications. overlapping research trajectories. Both the U.S. Navy The Allied and Axis powers both pursued rocket re- and Army (which included the Army Air Forces) devel- search and development programs during the war. Brit- oped rockets for ground bombardment purposes. The ish and American rocket scientists and engineers (and services also fielded aerial rockets for use by attack their Japanese adversaries) mainly focused their efforts aircraft. The Navy worked on rocket-powered bombs on tactical applications using solid-propellant rockets, for antisubmarine warfare, while the Army developed while the Germans pursued a variety of strategic and the handheld bazooka antitank rocket system. Lastly, tactical development programs primarily centered on both the Army and Navy conducted research into JATO liquid-propellant rockets. German Army researchers units for use with bombers and seaplanes. Throughout led by Wernher von Braun spent much of the war de- the war, however, limited coordination between the veloping the A-4 (more popularly known as the V-2), armed services and federal wartime planning bodies a sophisticated long-range, liquid-fueled rocket that hampered American rocket development efforts and led was employed to bombard London and Rotterdam late to duplicated research and competition amongst pro- in the war.
  • Advisory Circular 120-62

    Advisory Circular 120-62

    fw 3 Advisory U.S.Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Circular ’ AdminisWation Qlbject: TAKEOFF SAFETY TRAINING AID bte: g/Q/g4 AC No. 120-6.2 Announcement Of Availability Initiatedby: AFS-210 Change; 1 PURPOSE. This advisory circular (AC) announces the availability of a joint industry/Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Takeoff Safety Training Aid to help air carriers and pilots increase safety during the takeoff phase of flight. a. The FAA recommends early consideration of the information contained in the aid and use of the material, as appropriate, for training aircrews. This AC also highlights certain key items, concepts, and definitions that each air carrier or operator should address in their respective operational procedures and crew qualification programs. b This circular applies to Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 121 operators. However, many of the principles, concepts, and procedures described apply to operations under FAR Parts 918 129, and 135 for certain aircraft, and are recommended for use by those operators when applicable. 2 BACKGROUND. Takeoff accidents resulting from improper rejected takeoff (RTO) decisions and procedures are significant contributors to worldwide commercial aviation accident statistics. For those takeoffs that are rejected, and for takeoffs made under certain environmental conditions and with certain system failures, risks could be reduced by a higher level of flightcrew knowledge and by the use of improved procedures. Due to the risks and the accident statistics associated with takeoffs, a joint FAA/industry team studied what actions might be taken to increase takeoff safety. These studies included simulation trials and in-depth analysis of takeoff accidents and incidents.
  • PDF Version June July 2012

    PDF Version June July 2012

    IDWEST FLYER M AGAZINE JUNE/JULY 2012 Published For & By The Midwest Aviation Community Since 1978 midwestflyer.com EA-SA_Ad Committed_MFM F.indd 1 9/30/11 1:12 PM Vol. 34 No. 4 ISSN: 0194-5068 IDWEST FLYER ContentsContents M AGAZINE JUNE/JULY 2012 ON THE COVER: “Discovery” and its Boeing 747 companion “Pluto 95” takeoff from the Kennedy Space Center in Orlando, Florida, the morning of April 17, 2012, and make a final flyby before flying to Washington Dulles International Airport. Upon their arrival at Dulles, Discovery was removed from the Boeing 747 and placed on permanent display at the National Air and Space Museum’s Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center in Chantilly, Virginia. Complete coverage of this historic event, beginning on page 29. NASA Photo Published For & By The Midwest Aviation Community Since 1978 midwestflyer.com HEADLINES Jet Air Named 2012 Wisconsin Aviation Business of the Year .................. 50 Quad City International Airport FEATURES Named Illinois Primary Airport of the Year.............................................. 24 Wisconsin Recognizes & Strives For Excellence Outagamie County Regional Airport Receives Best Marketing Award ...... 26 At State Aviation Conference - American Barnstormers Tour To Showcase Golden Age of Aviation......... 39 by Dave Weiman ............................................ 18 Minnesota Senator & Representative Recognized Walker Municipal Receives By Recreational Aviation Foundation ..................................................... 49 2012 FAA/Governor’s Award .......................... 20 Jet Air Named 2012 Wisconsin Aviation Business of The Year ................. 50 Illinois Aviation Conference Addresses Wisconsin Flying Farmers Names Wisconsin Aviation FBO of The Year . .51 Fuel Fraud Taxes & Unfair Competition - K-State Lands In Top 10 In National Competition ...................................... 59 by Jim Bildilli .................................................. .22 Flying Salukis Again Among Nation’s Elite ................................................
  • A SEMI-EMPIRICAL METHODOLOGY for BALANCED FIELD LENGTH ESTIMATION of JET- ENGINED AIRCRAFT in EARLY DESIGN PHASES Tulio Angeiras Embraer S.A

    A SEMI-EMPIRICAL METHODOLOGY for BALANCED FIELD LENGTH ESTIMATION of JET- ENGINED AIRCRAFT in EARLY DESIGN PHASES Tulio Angeiras Embraer S.A

    A SEMI-EMPIRICAL METHODOLOGY FOR BALANCED FIELD LENGTH ESTIMATION OF JET- ENGINED AIRCRAFT IN EARLY DESIGN PHASES Tulio Angeiras Embraer S.A. and Aeronautical Technology Institute – ITA Product Development Engineer and Graduate Student Sao Jose dos Campos, SP, 12227-901, Brazil [email protected] Adson de Paula (ITA), Bento Mattos (ITA), Tarik Orra (Embraer) ABSTRACT Current levels of competitiveness displayed in business and commercial aviation market led to increasingly stringent performance and economy requirements. One of the key elements of these requirements is field performance, a factor that has great influence on the viability of certain route or operation for the aircraft in question, and that might shift the balance in a purchase decision. During early design phases, aerodynamic data about the aircraft being developed is often inaccurate and subject to changes during its evolution, which, alongside with difficulties do validate the results, renders numerical simulation methods unpractical for estimating field performance. These factors stimulated the development of a number of semi-empirical methodologies to estimate takeoff field lengths, of which some, by taking advantage of the available historical trend, produce very reasonable results and are widespread adopted on the aviation industry. Aiming to enable leaner aircraft designs, this paper presents an overview of several established methods, analyzing structure and comparing results obtained by their application to a databank of existing aircrafts. Finally, it
  • Appendix a Description of Declared Distances

    Appendix a Description of Declared Distances

    Appendix A Description of Declared Distances Declared distances at airports are a mechanism by which specific lengths of runway pavement are identified for use in aircraft operations. Declared distances are incorporated into the Operations Specifications of commercial aircraft operators that are part of the air carrier certificates and operations certificates issued by FAA under 14 CFR Part 119, as well as into the internal operations manuals of those operators. Pilots of commercial aircraft are required to comply with such specifications and manuals. The specified distance available for a particular operation such as landing may be different in each direction on the same runway pavement. The FAA defines four declared distances: • Takeoff Run Available (TORA) – the runway length declared available and suitable for satisfying takeoff run requirements. The TORA is measured from the start of takeoff to a point 200 feet from the beginning of the departure Runway Protection Zone. • Takeoff Distance Available (TODA) – this distance comprises the TORA plus the length of any remaining runway or clearway beyond the far end of the TORA. • Accelerate-Stop Distance Available (ASDA) – the runway plus stopway length declared available and suitable for the acceleration and deceleration of an aircraft that must abort its takeoff. A stopway is an area beyond the takeoff runway able to support the airplane during an aborted takeoff, without causing structural damage to the airplane. • Landing Distance Available (LDA) – the runway length that is declared available and suitable for satisfying aircraft landing distance requirements. The figure below illustrates how declared distances allow a runway pavement length of 11,600 feet to provide a usable runway length of 10,000 feet for landing and 10,600 feet for takeoffs in both directions while still providing the FAA-required runway safety area dimensions of 600 feet prior to the landing threshold and 1,000 feet beyond the runway end.
  • (VL for Attrid

    (VL for Attrid

    ECCAIRS Aviation 1.3.0.12 Data Definition Standard English Attribute Values ECCAIRS Aviation 1.3.0.12 VL for AttrID: 391 - Event Phases Powered Fixed-wing aircraft. (Powered Fixed-wing aircraft) 10000 This section covers flight phases specifically adopted for the operation of a powered fixed-wing aircraft. Standing. (Standing) 10100 The phase of flight prior to pushback or taxi, or after arrival, at the gate, ramp, or parking area, while the aircraft is stationary. Standing : Engine(s) Not Operating. (Standing : Engine(s) Not Operating) 10101 The phase of flight, while the aircraft is standing and during which no aircraft engine is running. Standing : Engine(s) Start-up. (Standing : Engine(s) Start-up) 10102 The phase of flight, while the aircraft is parked during which the first engine is started. Standing : Engine(s) Run-up. (Standing : Engine(s) Run-up) 990899 The phase of flight after start-up, during which power is applied to engines, for a pre-flight engine performance test. Standing : Engine(s) Operating. (Standing : Engine(s) Operating) 10103 The phase of flight following engine start-up, or after post-flight arrival at the destination. Standing : Engine(s) Shut Down. (Standing : Engine(s) Shut Down) 10104 Engine shutdown is from the start of the shutdown sequence until the engine(s) cease rotation. Standing : Other. (Standing : Other) 10198 An event involving any standing phase of flight other than one of the above. Taxi. (Taxi) 10200 The phase of flight in which movement of an aircraft on the surface of an aerodrome under its own power occurs, excluding take- off and landing.
  • An Investigation of Ctol Dual-Mode Pave Concepts

    An Investigation of Ctol Dual-Mode Pave Concepts

    AN INVESTIGATION OF CTOL DUAL-MODE PAVE CONCEPTS by James F. Marchman, III, Nanyaporn Interatep, Eugene Skelton, and William H. Mason Aerospace and Ocean Engineering Department Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA A REPORT TO NASA - LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER PERSONAL AIR VEHICLE EVALUATION PROJECT NASA GRANT NAG-1-01100 Virginia Tech AOE Report 276 January 2002 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 INTRODUCTION 5 A Primary Roadability Consideration: 3 or 4 Wheels 9 SENSITIVITY AND CONSTRAINT ANALYSIS 10 PAVE Mission Requirements 10 Sensitivity Study 12 PAVE DESIGN RECOMMENDATION 13 Initial Weight Estimation for Redesigned Pegasus 14 Wing Design 14 Inboard Box-Wing/Winglet Concept 15 Outboard Wing Stowage Design 16 Outboard Wing Concepts 16 Lift Coefficient Calculation for the New Wing Concept 20 Power Selection 21 Pusher Propeller 22 Predicted Noise Calculation 24 Component Weight Analysis 25 Performance Estimates 26 ROADABILITY 27 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 27 REFERENCES 29 FIGURES 30 - 38 APPENDIX A: Comparator Aircraft Performance and Sizing Data 39 APPENDIX B: Analysis of Comparator Aircraft 46 APPENDIX C: Roadability Evaluation from Reference 2 65 2 AN INVESTIGATION OF CTOL DUAL-MODE PAVE CONCEPTS by James F. Marchman, III, Nanyaporn Interatep, Eugene Skelton, and William H. Mason Aerospace and Ocean Engineering Department Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A study was conducted to assess the feasibility of the dual-mode concept for a personal air vehicle, to determine how constraints differ between the dual-mode concept and a CTOL general aviation aircraft, to recommend a dual-mode vehicle concept, and to recommend areas where further research can contribute to the successful development of a viable PAVE vehicle design.
  • Seaplane Guide.Pdf

    Seaplane Guide.Pdf

    seaplane ops guide INTRODUCTION TAKEOFF PERFORMANCE This booklet is meant to promote safety by offering a re- Statistically, a lot of seaplane accidents occur on take- view of selected seaplane topics. Some of the topics are off, and many of those have to do with inadequate takeoff intended for review at the beginning of the season to help performance for the waterway in question. Compared to us get back in the seaplane mindset after a period of win- wheelplanes, it is more difficult to reliably calculate takeoff ter inactivity. Other topics were selected because the ac- performance in seaplanes. Seaplane performance is more cident record suggests that attention to these areas might sensitive to a larger number of variables, and the perfor- prevent future mishaps. mance you experience at a given lake can change signifi- cantly from one flight to the next. While you don’t have the LAUNCHING AND TAXI luxury of calculating takeoff distance, you can anticipate how certain conditions will affect performance and over Certainly before getting in a seaplane and casting it adrift time develop a good feel for what your particular seaplane to start the engine, we give some thought to what we’re is capable of. about to do and make a plan; we consider weathervan- ing, anticipating how the airplane will drift, what to do if Drag - The seaplane is sensitive to water drag on the the engine doesn’t start, and have a paddle readily avail- high-end of the takeoff run, and anything that increases able in case the plan doesn’t quite come together.
  • FSF ALAR Briefing Note 6.4 -- Bounce Recovery -- Rejected Landing

    FSF ALAR Briefing Note 6.4 -- Bounce Recovery -- Rejected Landing

    Flight Safety Foundation Approach-and-landing Accident Reduction Tool Kit FSF ALAR Briefing Note 6.4 — Bounce Recovery – Rejected Landing A rejected landing (also called an aborted landing) is a go- Preconditions around maneuver initiated after touchdown of the main landing gear. A rejected landing is a challenging maneuver and typically Four preconditions (usually referred to as the “four-no rule”) is recommended only when an aircraft bounces more than must be observed before initiating a touch-and-go: approximately five feet (1.5 meters) off the runway after touchdown. • No ground spoilers: – Ground spoilers must not be armed or manually No global statistical data are available on rejected-landing selected after touchdown; incidents or accidents. Nevertheless, the following are possible consequences of an incorrect decision to conduct a rejected • No autobrake system: landing: – Autobrakes must not be armed; • Tail strike following a go-around initiated because of • No reverse: directional control difficulties after thrust reverser selection; – Thrust reversers must not be selected upon touchdown; and, • Aircraft performance limitation following the inappropriate selection of reverse thrust during a touch- • No pedal braking: and-go landing and failure of one reverser to stow; and, – Pedal braking must not be used after touchdown. • Loss of control following a go-around initiated after thrust reverser selection and failure of one reverser to stow. The above preconditions show that conducting a rejected landing during a nontraining flight (i.e., with ground spoilers and autobrakes armed, and being ready to select reverse thrust Touch-and-go Training upon touchdown) involves an added challenge. A touch-and-go landing is a training exercise.
  • FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 5-Year CIP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) (Attach Additional Sheets If Necessary) AIRPORT DIVISION - CENTRAL REGION

    FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 5-Year CIP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) (Attach Additional Sheets If Necessary) AIRPORT DIVISION - CENTRAL REGION

    FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 5-Year CIP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) (Attach additional sheets if necessary) AIRPORT DIVISION - CENTRAL REGION Airport Name, LOCID, City, State: Salina Regional Ariport, SLN, Salina, Kansas Prepared By: Kenny Bieker Sponsor Email: [email protected] Date Prepared: 12/5/17 Sponsor Signature: Sponsor Phone: 785-827-3914 Printed Name: Timothy F. Rogers FY Fund Source Amount 2018 The existing equipment is beginning to have a lot of wear and tear. Items are breaking within the Federal $797,850.00 actual structure of the vehicle. Replacement of our 2004 Rosenbauer, which has issues with wheel studs breaking, is desired. The replacement vehicle is currently an Index A, Class II vehicle per FAA State $0.00 A/C 150/5220-10E, Guide Specification for Aircraft Rescue Fire Fighting (ARFF) Vehicles but due to Local $88,650.00 qualifying flights at regular intervals on the airport we qualify for a 3000 gallon class V ARFF Vehicle. Total $886,500.00 2019 Terminal Area Narrative Report (SLN 2014 Airport Master Plan Update) - The start of United Federal $90,000.00 Express (operated by SkyWest Airlines) to United hubs at both the Denver International Airport (DEN) and the Chicago International Airport (ORD) will result in passenger growth at SLN. The SLN State $0.00 terminal building lacks capacity to accommodate projected passenger growth. Passenger growth will also require specific security needs. The report may result in an information revision to SLN’s 2014 Airport Master Plan Update. Local $10,000.00 Total $100,000.00 2019 This project would rehabilitate and convert Runway 4/22 into a TDG-II taxiway Federal $2,700,000.00 (Taxiway Delta) from Runway 12-30 to intersect with Runway 17/35.