Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2013 Adapted from the World Health Organization Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2Nd Edition

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2013 Adapted from the World Health Organization Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2Nd Edition Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Early Release / Vol. 62 June 14, 2013 U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2013 Adapted from the World Health Organization Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2nd Edition Continuing Education Examination available at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/cme/conted.html. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Early Release CONTENTS CONTENTS (Continued) Introduction ............................................................................................................1 Appendix A: Summary Chart of U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Methods ....................................................................................................................2 Contraceptive Use, 2010 .................................................................................. 47 How To Use This Document ...............................................................................3 Appendix B: When To Start Using Specific Contraceptive Summary of Changes from WHO SPR ............................................................4 Methods .............................................................................................................. 55 Contraceptive Method Choice .........................................................................4 Appendix C: Examinations and Tests Needed Before Initiation of Maintaining Updated Guidance ......................................................................4 Contraceptive Methods ................................................................................. 56 How To Be Reasonably Certain that a Woman Is Not Pregnant ............5 Appendix D: Routine Follow-Up After Contraceptive Initiation ........ 57 Intrauterine Contraception ................................................................................7 Appendix E: Management of Women with Bleeding Irregularities Implants ................................................................................................................. 14 While Using Contraception .......................................................................... 58 Injectables ............................................................................................................. 17 Appendix F: Management of the IUD when a Cu-IUD or an LNG-IUD Combined Hormonal Contraceptives ......................................................... 22 User Is Found To Have Pelvic Inflammatory Disease ........................... 59 Progestin-Only Pills ............................................................................................ 29 Standard Days Method ..................................................................................... 33 Emergency Contraception .............................................................................. 34 Female Sterilization ........................................................................................... 35 Disclosure of Relationship Male Sterilization ................................................................................................ 36 CDC, our planners, and our content experts wish to disclose they have no financial interests or other relationships with When Women Can Stop Using Contraceptives ....................................... 37 the manufacturers of commercial products, suppliers of com- Conclusion ............................................................................................................ 37 mercial services, or commercial supporters. Planners have Acknowledgment ............................................................................................... 38 reviewed content to ensure there is no bias. This document will not include any discussion of the unlabeled use of a product References ............................................................................................................. 38 or a product under investigational use, with the exception that some of the recommendations in this document might be inconsistent with package labeling. CDC does not accept commercial support. Front cover photos, left to right: intrauterine device, oral contraceptive pills, diaphragm, syringe for injectable contraceptives, male condom, transdermal contraceptive patch, etonogestrel implant, vaginal ring. The MMWR series of publications is published by the Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA 30333. Suggested Citation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [Title]. MMWR 2013;62(No. RR-#):[inclusive page numbers]. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Thomas R. Frieden, MD, MPH, Director Harold W. Jaffe, MD, MA, Associate Director for Science James W. Stephens, PhD, Director, Office of Science Quality Denise M. Cardo, MD, Acting Deputy Director for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services Stephanie Zaza, MD, MPH, Director, Epidemiology and Analysis Program Office MMWR Editorial and Production Staff Ronald L. Moolenaar, MD, MPH, Editor, MMWR Series Martha F. Boyd, Lead Visual Information Specialist Christine G. Casey, MD, Deputy Editor, MMWR Series Maureen A. Leahy, Julia C. Martinroe, Teresa F. Rutledge, Managing Editor, MMWR Series Stephen R. Spriggs, Terraye M. Starr David C. Johnson, Lead Technical Writer-Editor Visual Information Specialists Catherine B. Lansdowne, MS, Project Editor Quang M. Doan, MBA, Phyllis H. King Information Technology Specialists MMWR Editorial Board William L. Roper, MD, MPH, Chapel Hill, NC, Chairman Matthew L. Boulton, MD, MPH, Ann Arbor, MI Timothy F. Jones, MD, Nashville, TN Virginia A. Caine, MD, Indianapolis, IN Rima F. Khabbaz, MD, Atlanta, GA Barbara A. Ellis, PhD, MS, Atlanta, GA Dennis G. Maki, MD, Madison, WI Jonathan E. Fielding, MD, MPH, MBA, Los Angeles, CA Patricia Quinlisk, MD, MPH, Des Moines, IA David W. Fleming, MD, Seattle, WA Patrick L. Remington, MD, MPH, Madison, WI William E. Halperin, MD, DrPH, MPH, Newark, NJ John V. Rullan, MD, MPH, San Juan, PR King K. Holmes, MD, PhD, Seattle, WA William Schaffner, MD, Nashville, TN Early Release U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2013 Adapted from the World Health Organization Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2nd Edition Prepared by Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Summary The U. S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use 2013 (U.S. SPR), comprises recommendations that address a select group of common, yet sometimes controversial or complex, issues regarding initiation and use of specific contraceptive methods. These recommendations are a companion document to the previously published CDC recommendations U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2010 (U.S. MEC). U.S. MEC describes who can use various methods of contraception, whereas this report describes how contraceptive methods can be used. CDC based these U.S. SPR guidelines on the global family planning guidance provided by the World Health Organization (WHO). Although many of the recommendations are the same as those provided by WHO, they have been adapted to be more specific to U.S. practices or have been modified because of new evidence. In addition, four new topics are addressed, including the effectiveness of female sterilization, extended use of combined hormonal methods and bleeding problems, starting regular contraception after use of emergency contraception, and determining when contraception is no longer needed. The recommendations in this report are intended to serve as a source of clinical guidance for health-care providers; health-care providers should always consider the individual clinical circumstances of each person seeking family planning services. This report is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice for individual patients. Persons should seek advice from their health-care providers when considering family planning options. Introduction about contraceptive method choice. The U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2010 (U.S. MEC), focuses on who Unintended pregnancy rates remain high in the United can safely use specific methods of contraception and provides States; approximately 50% of all pregnancies are unintended, recommendations for the safety of contraceptive methods for with higher proportions among adolescent and young women, women with various medical conditions (e.g., hypertension and women who are racial/ethnic minorities, and women with lower diabetes) and characteristics (e.g., age, parity, and smoking status) 1 levels of education and income ( ). Unintended pregnancies (Appendix A) (5). The recommendations in this new guide, U.S. 2 increase the risk for poor maternal and infant outcomes ( ) Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2013 and in 2002, resulted in $5 billion in direct medical costs in the (U.S. SPR), focuses on how contraceptive methods can be used 3 United States ( ). Approximately half of unintended pregnancies and provides recommendations on optimal use of contraceptive are among women who were not using contraception at the methods for persons of all ages, including adolescents. time they became pregnant; the other half are among women During the past 15 years, CDC has contributed to the who became pregnant despite reported use of contraception development and updating of the WHO global
Recommended publications
  • Lactational Amenorrhea Method
    Lactational Amenorrhea Method Dr. Raqibat Idris [email protected] From Research to Practice: Training in Sexual and Reproductive Health Research 2017 Objectives of presentation • Define Lactational Amenorrhea Method (LAM) • Understand the mechanism of action of LAM • Know the efficacy of LAM • Know and describe the 3 criteria for LAM • Know the indication and contraindications for LAM • Know the focus and timing of counselling for LAM • List the advantages, disadvantages and health benefits of LAM • Know the elements of programming necessary for the provision of quality LAM services Introduction Breastfeeding delays the return of a woman’s fertility in the first few months following childbirth. Women who breastfeed are less likely to ovulate in this period. When compared with women who breastfeed partially or who do not breastfeed at all, women who breastfeed more intensively are less likely to have a normal ovulation before their first menstrual bleed postpartum (Berens et al., 2015). In a consensus meeting in Bellagio, Italy in 1998, scientists proposed that women who breastfeed fully or nearly fully while they remain amenorrhoeic in the first 6 months postpartum experience up to 98% protection from pregnancy. This formed the basis for the Lactational Amenorrhea Method and has since then been tested and confirmed by other studies (Berens et al., 2015; Van der Wijden et al., 2003; WHO, 1999). Berens P, Labbok M, The Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine. ABM Clinical Protocol #13: Contraception During Breastfeeding, Revised 2015. Breastfeeding Medicine. 2015 Feb;10(1):3-12. The World Health Organization multinational study of breast-feeding and lactational amenorrhea. III.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Birth Control Methods
    Report Published by the Katharine Dexter McCormick Library and the Education Division of Planned Parenthood Federation of America 434 West 33rd Street, New York, NY 10001 212-261-4716 www.plannedparenthood.org Current as of January 2012 A History of Birth Control Methods Contemporary studies show that, out of a list of eight somewhat effective — though not always safe or reasons for having sex, having a baby is the least practical (Riddle, 1992). frequent motivator for most people (Hill, 1997). This seems to have been true for all people at all times. Planned Parenthood is very proud of the historical Ever since the dawn of history, women and men role it continues to play in making safe and effective have wanted to be able to decide when and whether family planning available to women and men around to have a child. Contraceptives have been used in the world — from 1916, when Margaret Sanger one form or another for thousands of years opened the first birth control clinic in America; to throughout human history and even prehistory. In 1950, when Planned Parenthood underwrote the fact, family planning has always been widely initial search for a superlative oral contraceptive; to practiced, even in societies dominated by social, 1965, when Planned Parenthood of Connecticut won political, or religious codes that require people to “be the U.S. Supreme Court victory, Griswold v. fruitful and multiply” — from the era of Pericles in Connecticut (1965), that finally and completely rolled ancient Athens to that of Pope Benedict XVI, today back state and local laws that had outlawed the use (Blundell, 1995; Himes, 1963; Pomeroy, 1975; Wills, of contraception by married couples; to today, when 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Njm Vol 15.4 Final Correction
    REVIEW ARTICLE Current Concepts in Contraception A. M. Abasiattai MBBCH, FWACS Department of Obstetrics/Gynaecology, University of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Uyo, Nigeria ABSTRACT Background: Worldwide, contraceptive use has expensive contraceptives that are easier to deliver and increased substantially over the past two decades. The cause fewer side effects than currently available increased demand for wider choices of contraceptive options4. This article thus focuses on recent methods has resulted in extensive research and developments of existing contraceptive methods and rigorous clinical trials. This has led to improvements on also reviews recently developed methods currently in existing contraceptive methods and also the use worldwide. development of several new, more effective and acceptable methods with fewer side effects. Thus, this HORMONAL METHODS article presents a review of existing literature on recent Combined Oral Contraceptives (COCs) developments on existing contraceptive methods. It These are tablets that contain a combination of also reviews recently developed contraceptive methods oestrogen and progestin and are taken daily. Though currently in use worldwide. they act primarily by suppressing ovulation, they also Methods: Relevant literature was reviewed using thicken cervical mucus thus making it impervious to manual library search, electronic sources such as CD- sperm and alter the uterine endometrium 5,6. They are ROMS and internet articles. safe, very effective when used consistently and Conclusion: More effective methods of contraception accurately with a failure rate of 0.1 in 100 pregnancies in which are generally safer and easier to administer are the first year of use 6. Currently, the development of low increasingly being developed. Hopefully, as they dose formulations has led to a reduction in the side increasingly become available in our environment, they effects of COCs including venous thrombosis and will lead to and increase in acceptance and use of myocardial infarction 6,7.
    [Show full text]
  • Contraception Pearls for Practice
    Contraception Pearls for Practice Academic Detailing Service Planning committee Content Experts Clinical reviewer Gillian Graves MD FRCS(C), Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University Drug evaluation pharmacist Pam McLean-Veysey BScPharm, Drug Evaluation Unit, Nova Scotia Health Family Physician Advisory Panel Bernie Buffett MD, Neils Harbour, Nova Scotia Ken Cameron BSc MD CCFP, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia Norah Mogan MD CCFP, Liverpool, Nova Scotia Dalhousie CPD Bronwen Jones MD CCFP – Family Physician, Director Evidence-based Programs in CPD, Associate Professor, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University Michael Allen MD MSc – Family Physician, Professor, Post-retirement Appointment, Consultant Michael Fleming MD CCFP FCFP – Family Physician, Director Family Physician Programs in CPD Academic Detailers Isobel Fleming BScPharm ACPR, Director of Academic Detailing Service Lillian Berry BScPharm Julia Green-Clements BScPharm Kelley LeBlanc BScPharm Gabrielle Richard-McGibney BScPharm, BCPS, PharmD Cathy Ross RN BScNursing Thanks to Katie McLean, Librarian Educator, NSHA Central Zone for her help with literature searching. Cover artwork generated with Tagxedo.com Disclosure statements The Academic Detailing Service is operated by Dalhousie Continuing Professional Development, Faculty of Medicine and funded by the Nova Scotia Department of Health and Wellness. Dalhousie University Office of Continuing Professional Development has full control over content. Dr Bronwen Jones receives funding for her Academic Detailing work from the Nova Scotia Department of Health and Wellness. Dr Michael Allen has received funding from the Nova Scotia Department of Health and Wellness for research projects and to develop CME programs. Dr Gillian Graves has received funding for presentations from Actavis (Fibristal®) and is on the board of AbbVie (for Lupron®).
    [Show full text]
  • Preven Emergency Contraceptive
    9/1/1998 1 Rx Only PREVENÔ Emergency Contraceptive Kit consisting of Emergency Contraceptive Pills and Pregnancy Test Emergency Contraceptive Pills (Levonorgestrel and Ethinyl Estradiol Tablets, USP) and Pregnancy Test The PREVENÔ Emergency Contraceptive Kit is intended to prevent pregnancy after known or suspected contraceptive failure or unprotected intercourse. Emergency contraceptive pills (like all oral contraceptives) do not protect against infection with HIV (the virus that causes AIDS) and other sexually transmitted diseases. DESCRIPTION The PREVENÔ Emergency Contraceptive Kit consists of a patient information book, a urine pregnancy test and four (4) emergency contraceptive pills (ECPs). The pills in the PREVENÔ Emergency Contraceptive Kit are combination oral contraceptives (COCs) which are used to provide postcoital emergency contraception. Each blue film-coated pill contains 0.25 mg levonorgestrel (18,19-Dinorpregn-4-en-20- yn-3-one, 13-Ethyl-17-hydroxy-, (17a)-(-), a totally synthetic progestogen, and 0.05 mg ethinyl estradiol (19-Nor-17a-pregna-1,3,5, (10)-trien-20-yne-3,17-diol). The inactive ingredients present are polacrilin potassium, lactose, magnesium stearate, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, titanium dioxide, polyethylene glycol, polysorbate 80 and FD&C Blue No.2 Aluminum Lake. MOLECULES TO BE ADDED The Pregnancy Test uses monoclonal antibodies to detect the presence of hCG (Human Chorionic Gonadotropin) in the urine. It is sensitive to 20 – 25 mIU / mL 9/1/1998 2 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ECPs are not effective if the woman is pregnant; they act primarily by inhibiting ovulation. They may also act by altering tubal transport of sperm and/or ova (thereby inhibiting fertilization), and/or possibly altering the endometrium (thereby inhibiting implantation).
    [Show full text]
  • Contraception and Misconceptions
    CONTRACEPTION AND MISCONCEPTIONS CONTRACEPTION IN WOMEN WITH MENTAL ILLNESS OVERVIEW Hormones and mood How mental illness impacts on contraceptive choice Ideal contraception Pro and cons of contraceptive methods in women with mental illness Hormonal contraception and mood ESTROGENS anti-inflammatory neuroprotective effects of estradiol modulation of the limbic processing memory of emotionally-relevant information. estradiol “beneficially” modulates pathways implicated in the pathophysiology of depression, including serotonin and norepinephrine pathways PROGESTROGENS Previously thought to be anxiogenic, depressogenic Breakdown products Depression – alpha hydroxy progestrogen breakdown products pro – inflammatory, anxiogenic HORMONES AND MOODS – COMPLEX INTERPLAY MENTAL ILLNESS AND CONTRACEPTIVE CHOICE Effect of mental illness on contraceptive choice Effect of contraceptive choice on mental illness Drug interactions EFFECT MENTAL ILLNESS ON CONTRACEPTIVE CHOICE Impulsive Poor planning Cognitive and problem judgement Poor adherence IMPULSIVITY COGNITION POOR JUDGEMENT LETS NOT FORGET SUBSTANCES…… TYPES OF CONTRACEPTION No method Non hormonal Condom/Femidom Diaphragm Non hormone containing IUCD (Copper T) Hormonal COC POP Mirena Evra Patch Nuva Ring Implant ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES POP – avoid Same time every day COC Pros Effective Reduction PMS – monophasic estrogen dominant pill eg Femodene, Yaz, Nordette Cons Drug interactions Pill burden Daily dose EVRA PATCH Weekly patch Transdermal system: 150 mcg/day
    [Show full text]
  • Reseptregisteret 2013–2017 the Norwegian Prescription Database
    LEGEMIDDELSTATISTIKK 2018:2 Reseptregisteret 2013–2017 Tema: Legemidler og eldre The Norwegian Prescription Database 2013–2017 Topic: Drug use in the elderly Reseptregisteret 2013–2017 Tema: Legemidler og eldre The Norwegian Prescription Database 2013–2017 Topic: Drug use in the elderly Christian Berg Hege Salvesen Blix Olaug Fenne Kari Furu Vidar Hjellvik Kari Jansdotter Husabø Irene Litleskare Marit Rønning Solveig Sakshaug Randi Selmer Anne-Johanne Søgaard Sissel Torheim Utgitt av Folkehelseinstituttet/Published by Norwegian Institute of Public Health Område for Helsedata og digitalisering Avdeling for Legemiddelstatistikk Juni 2018 Tittel/Title: Legemiddelstatistikk 2018:2 Reseptregisteret 2013–2017 / The Norwegian Prescription Database 2013–2017 Forfattere/Authors: Christian Berg, redaktør/editor Hege Salvesen Blix Olaug Fenne Kari Furu Vidar Hjellvik Kari Jansdotter Husabø Irene Litleskare Marit Rønning Solveig Sakshaug Randi Selmer Anne-Johanne Søgaard Sissel Torheim Acknowledgement: Julie D. W. Johansen (English text) Bestilling/Order: Rapporten kan lastes ned som pdf på Folkehelseinstituttets nettsider: www.fhi.no The report can be downloaded from www.fhi.no Grafisk design omslag: Fete Typer Ombrekking: Houston911 Kontaktinformasjon/Contact information: Folkehelseinstituttet/Norwegian Institute of Public Health Postboks 222 Skøyen N-0213 Oslo Tel: +47 21 07 70 00 ISSN: 1890-9647 ISBN: 978-82-8082-926-9 Sitering/Citation: Berg, C (red), Reseptregisteret 2013–2017 [The Norwegian Prescription Database 2013–2017] Legemiddelstatistikk 2018:2, Oslo, Norge: Folkehelseinstituttet, 2018. Tidligere utgaver / Previous editions: 2008: Reseptregisteret 2004–2007 / The Norwegian Prescription Database 2004–2007 2009: Legemiddelstatistikk 2009:2: Reseptregisteret 2004–2008 / The Norwegian Prescription Database 2004–2008 2010: Legemiddelstatistikk 2010:2: Reseptregisteret 2005–2009. Tema: Vanedannende legemidler / The Norwegian Prescription Database 2005–2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Patch Development with New Drugs Versus Generic Development – Principles and Methods
    Patch development with new drugs versus generic development – principles and methods Dr. Barbara Schug SocraTec R&D, Oberursel , Germany www.socratec-pharma.de AGAH Workshop, The new European modified Release Guideline- from cook book to interpretation, Bonn, June 15th –16th, 2015 Some basics Physico-chemical properties / conventional patches small molecule < 500kDa lipophilic potent therapeutic concept which requires low fluctuation Skin controls release rate drug substance dispersed in adhesive matrix Patch controls release rate rate controlling membrane between drug reservoir and skin Currently marketed patches Year Generic (Brand) Names Indication 1979 Scopolamine (Transderm Scop®) Motion sickness 1982 Nitroglycerine (Nitroderm TTS) Angina pectoris 1984 Clonidine (Catapress TTS®) Hypertension 1986 Estradiol (Estraderm®) Menopausal symptoms 1990 Fentanyl (Duragesic®) Chronic pain 1991 Nicotine (Nicoderm®, Habitrol®, Prostep®) Smoking cessation 1993 Testosterone (Androderm®) Testosterone deficiency 1995 Lidocaine/epinephrine (Iontocaine®) Local dermal analgesia 1998 Estradiol/norethindrone (Combipatch®) Menopausal symptoms 1999 Lidocaine (Lidoderm®) Post-herpetic neuralgia pain 2001 Ethinyl estradiol/norelgestromin (OrthoEvra®) Contraception 2003 Estradiol/levonorgestrel (Climara Pro®) Menopause 2003 Oxybutynin (Oxytrol®) Overactive bladder 2004 Lidocaine/ultrasound (SonoPrep®) Local dermal anesthesia Source: modified from Wilson EJ, Three Generations: The Past, Present, and Future of Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems, May 2014
    [Show full text]
  • 209627Orig1s000
    CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: 209627Orig1s000 MULTI-DISCIPLINE REVIEW Summary Review Office Director Cross Discipline Team Leader Review Clinical Review Non-Clinical Review Statistical Review Clinical Pharmacology Review Reviewers of Multi-Disciplinary Review and Evaluation SECTIONS OFFICE/ AUTHORED/ ACKNOWLEDGED/ DISCIPLINE REVIEWER DIVISION APPROVED Mark Seggel, Ph.D. OPQ/ONDP/DNDP2 Authored: Section 4.2 Digitally signed by Mark R. Seggel -S CMC Lead DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=HHS, ou=FDA, ou=People, cn=Mark R. Signature: Mark R. Seggel -S Seggel -S, 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.1=1300071539 Date: 2018.08.08 16:29:15 -04'00' Frederic Moulin, DVM, PhD OND/ODE3/DBRUP Authored: Section 5 Pharmacology/ Digitally signed by Frederic Moulin -S Toxicology DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=HHS, ou=FDA, ou=People, Reviewer Signature: Frederic Moulin -S 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.1=2001708658, cn=Frederic Moulin -S Date: 2018.08.08 15:26:57 -04'00' Kimberly Hatfield, PhD OND/ODE3/DBRUP Approved: Section 5 Pharmacology/ Toxicology Digitally signed by Kimberly P. Hatfield -S DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=HHS, ou=FDA, ou=People, Team Leader Signature: Kimberly P. Hatfield -S 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.1=1300387215, cn=Kimberly P. Hatfield -S Date: 2018.08.08 14:56:10 -04'00' Li Li, Ph.D. OCP/DCP3 Authored: Sections 6 and 17.3 Clinical Pharmacology Dig ta ly signed by Li Li S DN c=US o=U S Government ou=HHS ou=FDA ou=People Reviewer cn=Li Li S Signature: Li Li -S 0 9 2342 19200300 100 1 1=20005 08577 Date 2018 08 08 15 39 23 04'00' Doanh Tran, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • F.8 Ethinylestradiol-Etonogestrel.Pdf
    General Items 1. Summary statement of the proposal for inclusion, change or deletion. Here within, please find the evidence to support the inclusion Ethinylestradiol/Etonogestrel Vaginal Ring in the World Health Organization’s Essential Medicines List (EML). Unintended pregnancy is regarded as a serious public health issue both in developed and developing countries and has received growing research and policy attention during last few decades (1). It is a major global concern due to its association with adverse physical, mental, social and economic outcomes. Developing countries account for approximately 99% of the global maternal deaths in 2015, with sub-Saharan Africa alone accounting for roughly 66% (2). Even though the incidence of unintended pregnancy has declined globally in the past decade, the rate of unintended pregnancy remains high, particularly in developing regions. (3) Regarding the use of contraceptive vaginal rings, updated bibliography (4,5,6) states that contraceptive vaginal rings (CVR) offer an effective contraceptive option, expanding the available choices of hormonal contraception. Ethinylestradiol/Etonogestrel Vaginal Ring is a non-biodegradable, flexible, transparent with an outer diameter of 54 mm and a cross-sectional diameter of 4 mm. It contains 11.7 mg etonogestrel and 2.7 mg ethinyl estradiol. When placed in the vagina, each ring releases on average 0.120 mg/day of etonogestrel and 0.015 mg/day of ethinyl estradiol over a three-week period of use. Ethinylestradiol/Etonogestrel Vaginal Ring is intended for women of fertile age. The safety and efficacy have been established in women aged 18 to 40 years. The main advantages of CVRs are their effectiveness (similar or slightly better than the pill), ease of use without the need of remembering a daily routine, user ability to control initiation and discontinuation, nearly constant release rate allowing for lower doses, greater bioavailability and good cycle control with the combined ring, in comparison with oral contraceptives.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2010
    Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report www.cdc.gov/mmwr Early Release May 28, 2010 / Vol. 59 U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2010 Adapted from the World Health Organization Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 4th edition department of health and human services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Early Release CONTENTS The MMWR series of publications is published by the Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, Centers for Introduction .............................................................................. 1 Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), U.S. Department of Health Methods ................................................................................... 2 and Human Services, Atlanta, GA 30333. How to Use This Document ......................................................... 3 Suggested Citation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [Title]. MMWR Early Release 2010;59[Date]:[inclusive page numbers]. Using the Categories in Practice ............................................... 3 Recommendations for Use of Contraceptive Methods ................. 4 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Contraceptive Method Choice .................................................. 4 Thomas R. Frieden, MD, MPH Director Contraceptive Method Effectiveness .......................................... 4 Peter A. Briss, MD, MPH Unintended Pregnancy and Increased Health Risk ..................... 4 Acting Associate Director for Science Keeping Guidance Up to Date ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wellness Benefits
    Wellness Benefits University of South Alabama This schedule outlines services and items that the University of South Alabama considers a preventive service under this plan. These services must be performed by a physician in the University of South Alabama Health System provider network or by a dermatologist, endocrinologist, durable medical equipment provider, ancillary service provider, urologist, or rheumatologist provider (as applicable) in the entire VIVA HEALTH network. Many of these services are provided as part of an annual physical. This list does not apply to all VIVA HEALTH plans. Please refer to your Summary Plan Description to determine the terms of your health plan. PREVENTIVE SERVICE FREQUENCY/LIMITATIONS Well Baby Visits (Age 0-2) As recommended per guidelines1 Routine screenings, tests, and immunizations As recommended per guidelines Well Child Visits (Age 3-17) One per year at PCP2 Routine screenings, tests, & immunizations As recommended per guidelines HIV screening and counseling As recommended per guidelines Obesity screening As recommended per guidelines Hepatitis B virus screening As recommended per guidelines Sexually transmitted infection counseling Annually Skin cancer behavioral counseling (Beginning at age 10) As recommended per guidelines Routine Physical (Age 18+) One per year at PCP2 Alcohol misuse screening and counseling Annually Blood pressure screening Annually Cholesterol screening As recommended per guidelines Depression screening Annually Diabetes screening As recommended per
    [Show full text]