Report of the Technical Subcommittee of the Canada-United States Groundfish Committee 51St Annual Meeting of the TSC May 5-6, 2010 Nanaimo, British Columbia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report of the Technical Subcommittee of the Canada-United States Groundfish Committee 51St Annual Meeting of the TSC May 5-6, 2010 Nanaimo, British Columbia Report of the Technical Subcommittee of the Canada-United States Groundfish Committee 51st Annual Meeting of the TSC May 5-6, 2010 Nanaimo, British Columbia Appointed by the Second Conference on Coordination of Fisheries Regulations between Canada and the United States Compiled by the Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission History of TSC Meeting Locations, Hosts and Chairpersons YEAR DATES LOCATION HOST CHAIR 1984 June 20-22 British Columbia Westrheim Rigby 1985 June 25-27 Juneau, AK Morrison Westrheim 1986 June 19-19 Ashland, OR Demory Westrheim 1987 June 9-11 Seattle, WA Jagielo Demory 1988 June 7-9 Carmel, CA Henry Demory 1989 June 6-9 Ladysmith, BC Saunders Jagielo 1990 June 5-7 Sitka, AK Bracken Jagielo 1991 June 4-6 Newport, OR Barss Wilkins 1992 May 5-7 Seattle, WA Jagielo Wilkins 1993 May 5-7 Point Lobos, CA Thomas Saunders 1994 May 3-5 Nanaimo, BC Saunders Saunders 1995 May 2-3 Seattle, WA O’Connell Bracken 1996 May 7-9 Newport, OR Barss O’Connell 1997 May 6-8 Tiburon, CA Thomas Barss 1998 May 5-7 Olympia, WA Jagielo Barss 1999 May 4-6 Seattle, WA Methot Barnes 2000 May 9-10 Nanaimo, BC Saunders Barnes 2001 May 8-10 Newport, OR Schmitt Schmitt 2002 May 7-8 Point Lobos, CA Barnes Methot 2003 May 6-7 Sitka, AK O’Connell Jagielo 2004 May 4-5 Coupeville, WA Wilkins Jagielo 2005 May 3-4 Parksville, BC Stanley Stanley 2006 May 2-3 Otter Rock, OR Parker Stanley 2007 April 24-25 Santa Cruz, CA Field Brylinsky 2008 May 6-7 Seattle, WA Wilkins Brylinsky 2009 May 5-6 Juneau, AK Clausen Clausen 2010 May 5-6 Nanaimo, BC Stanley Clausen Table of Contents HISTORY OF TSC MEETING LOCATIONS .......................................... Inside Cover A. OVERVIEW AND TERMS OF REFERENCE ...............................................................1 B. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................3 C. MINUTES OF THE TECHNICAL SUB-COMMITTEE ...............................................5 D. PARENT COMMITTEE MINUTES ................................................................................18 E. AGENCY REPORTS ..........................................................................................................20 1. ALASKA FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE ..........................................................................................................21 2. CANADA, BRITISH COLUMBIA GROUNDFISH FISHERIES .......................................108 3. INTERNATIONAL PACIFIC HALIBUT COMMISSION (IPHC) .....................................130 4. NORTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE ..........................................................................................................148 5. SOUTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE ..........................................................................................................212 6. STATE OF ALASKA – ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME .....................233 7. STATE OF OREGON – DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE ...............................277 8. STATE OF WASHINGTON – DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE .....................292 A. Overview and Terms of Reference During the Conference on Coordination of Fisheries Regulations Between Canada and the United States (April 1959, Vancouver B.C.), the Ad Hoc Committee on Trawl Fishery Regulations recommended that the governments of Canada and the United States establish a continuing group made up of administrative and technical representatives of Oregon, Washington and Canada to review trawl regulations, to exchange information of status of bottom fish stocks, and to continue, enhance and coordinate bottom fish research programs. The Technical Sub-committee (TSC) was then created by the Committee on Trawl Fishery Regulations (now the Canada-U.S. Groundfish Committee) at the trawl committee meeting held in Seattle, Washington, on November 4, 1959. The TSC first met in Portland, Oregon, on January 19-20, 1960. Dr. K.S. Ketchen (Canada) served as Chairman. Member agencies at the time were the Fisheries Research Board of Canada (now the Department of Fisheries and Oceans), Washington Department of Fisheries (now the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife), Fish Commission of Oregon (now the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife), and the California Department of Fish and Game. In 1972, two more agencies became members – the Alaska Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Bureau of Commercial Fisheries (now the National Marine Fisheries Service). The TSC has met at least annually since 1960 and submitted a processed report of each meeting to its Parent Committee. These terms of reference did not apply to Pacific halibut, whose research and management are the responsibility of the International Pacific Halibut Commission: 1. Exchange information on the status of groundfish stocks of mutual concern and coordinate, whenever possible, desirable programs of research. 2. Recommend the continuance and further development of research programs having potential value as scientific basis for future management of the groundfish fishery. 3. Review the scientific and technical aspects of existing or proposed management strategies and their component regulations relevant to conservation of stocks or other scientific aspects of groundfish conservation and management of mutual interest. 4. Transmit approved recommendations and appropriate documentation to appropriate sectors of Canadian and U.S. governments and encourage implementation of the recommendations. The TSC has exhibited considerable flexibility in reacting to the diverse problems of the dynamic groundfish fishery off western Canada and the United States. It has coordinated coastwide fishery statistics and research projects; created working groups to deal in depth with specific problems; scheduled workshops at which appropriate specialists met to jointly deal with specific problems and exchange data and information; and provided an on-going forum for exchange of data, procedures, and regulations. The TSC has identified problems associated with the utilization and management of groundfish resources of importance to both countries; often well in advance of public or agency awareness. The concerns expressed in 1962 by the TSC over the development of foreign fisheries and recommendations for stock assessments were significant. TSC-coordinated Canada-U.S. research on Pacific ocean perch provided the basis 1 for negotiation of bilateral fishing agreements between the United States and Japan and the USSR. Furthermore, the continually updated information provided the basis for quotas imposed in 1977 by Canada and the United States when they both promulgated their 200-mile zones of extended jurisdiction. 2 B. Executive Summary The TSC met May 5-6, 2010 in Nanaimo, British Columbia. The meeting was hosted by DFO Pacific Biological Station and held at the Nanaimo Convention Center. The meeting was chaired by Dave Clausen, AFSC Auke Bay Lab. As is done each year, participants reviewed previous year (2009) research achievements and projected current year (2010) research for each agency. The TSC again noted the ongoing work of the Committee of Age Reading Experts (CARE) (http://care.psmfc.org), a long-standing TSC Working Group that was originally created by TSC in 1982. Shayne MacLellan (DFO), representing CARE, reviewed CARE activities that followed the CARE 2009 workshop. The results of the workshop were summarized during the previous TSC meeting. During the workshop, seven CARE to CARE recommendations were developed. Related to these, CARE subsequently assembled and presented a poster on the mission, history, and accomplishments of CARE at the August 2009 International Otolith Symposium in Monterey, California. CARE has tasked itself with updating the CARE manual and exploring the possibility of a meeting in 2010 to review results of the sablefish otolith exchange study. There were no outstanding TSC to CARE recommendations that required action and no outstanding recommendations from CARE to TSC. Shayne noted that Moss Landing has not sent a representative to the last two CARE meetings. With the retirement of Greg Cailliet and Allen Andrews moving to Hawaii, future MLML representation may be in question. There was no Trawl Survey Working Group Report meeting in 2009; however the committee endorsed a meeting for early 2011. TSC suggested that the format be expanded to include hook- and-line surveys (see TSC to TSC recommendations below). Discussion topics for the meeting would include survey design issues, operational issues, and updates concerning at-sea methods of data acquisition. Members from most of the agencies contributed to a discussion on developing methodologies for data poor assessments. Steve Ralston mentioned that at the NMFS National Stock Assessment Workshop this year, data poor assessments will be a major discussion topic and that a WG will produce a document with recommendations. There was a suggestion that TSC sponsor a workshop on data poor assessment methods or create a WG but the overall committee noted that there already appeared to be lot of activity in this field with numerous conferences and publications including books dedicated to the issue. The TSC did not endorse any specific recommendations on this issue. Greg Workman noted that the process to formally ratify the hake treaty between the U.S. and Canada has slowed and that each country has submitted “competing” assessments for the last three years. He
Recommended publications
  • A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans
    RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2009 Supplement No. 21: 1–109 Date of Publication: 15 Sep.2009 © National University of Singapore A CLASSIFICATION OF LIVING AND FOSSIL GENERA OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS Sammy De Grave1, N. Dean Pentcheff 2, Shane T. Ahyong3, Tin-Yam Chan4, Keith A. Crandall5, Peter C. Dworschak6, Darryl L. Felder7, Rodney M. Feldmann8, Charles H. J. M. Fransen9, Laura Y. D. Goulding1, Rafael Lemaitre10, Martyn E. Y. Low11, Joel W. Martin2, Peter K. L. Ng11, Carrie E. Schweitzer12, S. H. Tan11, Dale Tshudy13, Regina Wetzer2 1Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] 2Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007 United States of America [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3Marine Biodiversity and Biosecurity, NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] 4Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan, Republic of China [email protected] 5Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 United States of America [email protected] 6Dritte Zoologische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Austria [email protected] 7Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504 United States of America [email protected] 8Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242 United States of America [email protected] 9Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] 10Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20560 United States of America [email protected] 11Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 12Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Crab Cryptofauna (Brachyura and Anomura)
    £2 Sif 19° ' ^ TRANSACTIONS OF THE SAN DIEGO SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY VOLUME 21, 1985-1989 CONTENTS 1. Motility and calcareous parts in extant and fossil Acrothoracica (Crustacea: Cirripedia), based primarily upon new species burrowing in the deep-sea scleractinian coral Enallopsammia. By Mark J. Grygier and William A. Newman, 29 October 1985 2. The Sangamon interglacial vertebrate fauna from Rancho la Brisca, Sonora, Mexico. By Thomas R. Van Devender, Amadeo M. Rea, and Michael L. Smith, 29 October 1985 3. Floral morphology, nectar production, and breeding systems in Dudleya subgenus Dudleya (Crassulaceae). By Geoffrey A. Levin and Thomas W. Mulroy, 29 October 1985 4. Fishes living in deepsea thermal vents in the tropical eastern Pacific, with descriptions of a new genus and two new species of eelpouts (Zoarcidae). By Richard H. Rosenblatt and Daniel M. Cohen, 24 February 1986 5. A lectotype for Dinapate wrightii Horn, the giant palm-borer, and description of a new species of Dinapate from eastern Mexico (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae). By Kenneth W. Cooper, 24 February 1986 6. Holocene terrestrial gastropod faunas from Isla Santa Cruz and Isla Floreana, Galapagos: evidence for late Holocene declines. By Steven M. Chambers and David W. Steadman, 5 December 1986 7. Callorhinus gilmorei n. sp., (Carnivora: Otariidae) from the San Diego Formation (Blancan) and its implications for otariid phylogeny. By Annalisa Berta and Thomas A. Demere, 5 December 1986 8. Fossil Tanaidacea. By Frederick R. Schram, Jiirgen Sieg, and Eric Malzahn, 5 December 1986 9. Another new forest-dwelling frog (Leptodactylidae: Eleutherodactylus) from the Cockpit Country of Jamaica. By Richard I.
    [Show full text]
  • Bases Para El Establecimiento De Un Nuevo Sistema Regulatorio Del Descarte En Las Principales Pesquerías Nacionales
    Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso Facultad de Recursos Naturales Escuela de Ciencias del Mar Valparaíso – Chile Informe Final Bases para el establecimiento de un nuevo sistema regulatorio del descarte en las principales pesquerías nacionales (Proyecto FIP N° 2007 - 32) Valparaíso, abril de 2009 i Título : “Bases para el establecimiento de un nuevo sistema regulatorio del descarte en las principales pesquerías nacionales” Proyecto FIP N° 2007-32 Requirente : Fondo de Investigación Pesquera Contraparte : Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso Facultad de Recursos Naturales Unidad Ejecutora : Escuela de Ciencias del Mar Avda. Altamirano 1480 Casilla 1020 Valparaíso Investigador Responsable : René Cerda D’Amico Escuela de Ciencias del Mar Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso Fono : 56-32-2274249 Fax : 56-32-2274206 E-mail: [email protected] ii EQUIPO DE TRABAJO INVESTIGADORES INSTITUCION AREA DE TRABAJO Análisis y evaluación de aspectos René Cerda D. PUCV económicos del descarte Análisis y evaluación del efecto Teófilo Melo F. PUCV tecnológico-pesquero Administración Pesquera. Diagnóstico del Patricio Pavez C. PUCV descarte José Iván Sepúlveda V. PUCV Impacto ambiental del descarte Análisis del sistema regulatorio y legislación Eduardo Aldunate L. PUCV comparada CO-INVESTIGADORES INSTITUCION AREA DE TRABAJO Y COLABORADORES Administración, gestión del proyecto y Ivonne Montenegro U. PUCV manejo de bases de información y de datos Andrea Bello S.∗ PUCV Impacto ambiental del descarte Manejo de bases de datos económicas y Juan Carlos Correa B. PUCV toma de datos en terreno Roberto Escobar H. PUCV Encuestas y toma de datos en terreno Walda Flores G. PUCV Aspectos legales y sancionatorios ∗ Se incorpora como colaboradora en el área de ecología marina iii Distribución de ejemplares 4 Fondo de Investigación Pesquera 1 Dirección Escuela de Ciencias del Mar – PUCV 1 Investigador Responsable iv DOCUMENTOS GENERADOS A LA FECHA Escuela de Ciencias del Mar.
    [Show full text]
  • 655 Appendix G
    APPENDIX G: GLOSSARY Appendix G-1. Demersal Fish Species Alphabetized by Species Name. ....................................... G1-1 Appendix G-2. Demersal Fish Species Alphabetized by Common Name.. .................................... G2-1 Appendix G-3. Invertebrate Species Alphabetized by Species Name.. .......................................... G3-1 Appendix G-4. Invertebrate Species Alphabetized by Common Name.. ........................................ G4-1 G-1 Appendix G-1. Demersal Fish Species Alphabetized by Species Name. Demersal fish species collected at depths of 2-484 m on the southern California shelf and upper slope, July-October 2008. Species Common Name Agonopsis sterletus southern spearnose poacher Anchoa compressa deepbody anchovy Anchoa delicatissima slough anchovy Anoplopoma fimbria sablefish Argyropelecus affinis slender hatchetfish Argyropelecus lychnus silver hachetfish Argyropelecus sladeni lowcrest hatchetfish Artedius notospilotus bonyhead sculpin Bathyagonus pentacanthus bigeye poacher Bathyraja interrupta sandpaper skate Careproctus melanurus blacktail snailfish Ceratoscopelus townsendi dogtooth lampfish Cheilotrema saturnum black croaker Chilara taylori spotted cusk-eel Chitonotus pugetensis roughback sculpin Citharichthys fragilis Gulf sanddab Citharichthys sordidus Pacific sanddab Citharichthys stigmaeus speckled sanddab Citharichthys xanthostigma longfin sanddab Cymatogaster aggregata shiner perch Embiotoca jacksoni black perch Engraulis mordax northern anchovy Enophrys taurina bull sculpin Eopsetta jordani
    [Show full text]
  • Brachyura and Anomura
    CATALOG OF THE BENTHIC INVERTEBRATE COLLECTIONS OF THE SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY I - DECAPOD CRUSTACEA AND STOMATOPODA Spencer R. Luke SIO REFERENCE SERIES SIO Reference No. 77-9 October 1977 SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO LA JOLLA, CALIFORNIA 92093 PREFACE This is the first in a series of catalogs of holdings of the Benthic In­ vertebrate Collections of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography. While the collections date back to the earliest days of the Institution, they have ex­ panded markedly during the past decade through the efforts of numerous Scripps scientists and graduate students as well as through gifts or donations from private and government sources. Use of the collections has also increased greatly, especially by scientists outside the Institution, and it has there­ fore been deemed appropriate to inform the scientific community at large of the holdings of the Benthic Invertebrate Collection of the Scripps Institu­ tion of Oceanography by this series of catalogs. The present catalog, containing 3093 entries, covers the Decapod Crustacea (exclusive of the Penaeidea, Paguridae, and Porcellanidae)'and the Stomatopoda. Of those excluded, the first are on loan to a specialist on the group while the second and third are not yet sufficiently sorted and identified to be in­ cluded at this time. The Euphausiacea, considered decapods by some, are con­ tained in the Planktonic Invertebrate Collections (Dr. A. Fleminger, Curator). Each catalog will follow the format of this one. The arrangement is sys­ tematic; each entry is generally a preliminary identification and includes relevant field data. The material can be examined here, or it may be made available by loan, gift, or exchange to qualified persons or private or gov­ ernment agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Two New Cryptic and Sympatric Species of the King Crab Parasite Briarosaccus (Cirripedia: Rhizocephala) in the North Pacific
    Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2016, 176, 3–14. With 5 figures Two new cryptic and sympatric species of the king crab parasite Briarosaccus (Cirripedia: Rhizocephala) in the North Pacific CHRISTOPH NOEVER1*, ANDREW OLSON2 and HENRIK GLENNER1,3 1Marine Biodiversity Group, Department of Biology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway 2Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Juneau, AK, USA 3CMEC, Natural History Museum, University of Copenhagen, Denmark Received 20 February 2015; revised 1 June 2015; accepted for publication 10 June 2015 Rhizocephalan barnacles have been reported to parasitize a wide range of king crab species (Lithodidae). So far all these parasites have been assigned to a single species, Briarosaccus callosus Boschma, 1930, which is assumed to have a global distribution. Here we investigate Briarosaccus specimens from three different king crab hosts from the fjord systems of Southeastern Alaska: Lithodes aequispinus Benedict, 1895, Paralithodes camtschaticus (Tilesius, 1815), and Paralithodes platypus (Brandt, 1850). Using molecular markers and by morphological com- parison we show that Briarosaccus specimens from these three commercial exploited king crabs are in fact mor- phologically distinct from B. callosus, and further represent two separate species which we describe. The two new species, Briarosaccus auratum n. sp. and B. regalis n. sp., are cryptic by morphological means and were identi- fied as distinct species by the use of genetic markers (COI and 16S). They occur sympatrically, yet no overlap in king crab hosts occurs, with B. auratum n. sp. only found on L. aequispinus, and B. regalis n. sp. as parasite of the two Paralithodes hosts. © 2016 The Authors. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2016 doi: 10.1111/zoj.12304 ADDITIONAL KEYWORDS: COI – cryptic speciation – DNA – Lithodidae – parasites – species delimita- tion – sympatric occurrence – 16S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Natural Resources of Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary
    Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series ONMS-13-05 The Natural Resources of Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary: A Focus on Federal Waters Final Report June 2013 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service Office of National Marine Sanctuaries June 2013 About the Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Ocean Service (NOS) administers the Office of National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS). Its mission is to identify, designate, protect and manage the ecological, recreational, research, educational, historical, and aesthetic resources and qualities of nationally significant coastal and marine areas. The existing marine sanctuaries differ widely in their natural and historical resources and include nearshore and open ocean areas ranging in size from less than one to over 5,000 square miles. Protected habitats include rocky coasts, kelp forests, coral reefs, sea grass beds, estuarine habitats, hard and soft bottom habitats, segments of whale migration routes, and shipwrecks. Because of considerable differences in settings, resources, and threats, each marine sanctuary has a tailored management plan. Conservation, education, research, monitoring and enforcement programs vary accordingly. The integration of these programs is fundamental to marine protected area management. The Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series reflects and supports this integration by providing a forum for publication and discussion of the complex issues currently facing the sanctuary system. Topics of published reports vary substantially and may include descriptions of educational programs, discussions on resource management issues, and results of scientific research and monitoring projects. The series facilitates integration of natural sciences, socioeconomic and cultural sciences, education, and policy development to accomplish the diverse needs of NOAA’s resource protection mandate.
    [Show full text]
  • Instituto Del Mar Del Perú
    BOLETÍN INSTITUTO DEL MAR DEL PERÚ ISSN 0458 – 7766 Volumen 27, Números 1-2 CATÁLOGO DE CRUSTÁCEOS DECÁPODOS Y ESTOMATÓPODOS DEL PERÚ Víctor Moscoso Enero - Diciembre 2012 Callao, Perú 1 El INSTITUTO DEL MAR DEL PERÚ (IMARPE) tiene cuatro tipos de publicaciones científicas: BOLETÍN (ISSN 0458–7766), desde 1964.- Es la publicación de rigor científico, que constituye un aporte al mejor conocimiento de los recursos acuáticos, las interacciones entre éstos y su ambiente, y que permite obtener conclusiones preliminares o finales sobre las investigaciones. El BOLETÍN constituye volúmenes y números semestrales, y la referencia a esta publicación es: Bol Inst Mar Perú. INFORME (ISSN 0378 – 7702), desde 1965.- Es la publicación que da a conocer los resultados preliminares o finales de una operación o actividad, programada dentro de un campo específico de la investigación científica y tecnológica y que requiere difusión inmediata. El INFORME ha tenido numeración consecutiva desde 1965 hasta el 2001, con referencia del mes y el año, pero sin reconocer el Volumen. A partir del 2004, se consigna el Volumen 32, que corresponde al número de años que se viene publicando, y además se anota el fascículo o número trimestral respectivo. La referencia a esta publicación es: Inf Inst Mar Perú. INFORME PROGRESIVO, desde 1995 hasta 2001. Una publicación con dos números mensuales, de distribución nacional. Contiene información de investigaciones en marcha, conferencias y otros documentos técnicos sobre temas de vida marina. El INFORME PROGRESIVO tiene numeración consecutiva, sin mencionar el año o volumen. Debe ser citado como Inf Prog Inst Mar Perú. Su publicación ha sido interrumpida.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Zoogeografía De Los Crustáceos Decápodos Chilenos Marinos Y Dulceacuícolas
    Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research E-ISSN: 0718-560X [email protected] Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso Chile Retamal, Marco A.; Moyano, Hugo I. Zoogeografía de los crustáceos decápodos chilenos marinos y dulceacuícolas Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research, vol. 38, núm. 3, noviembre, 2010, pp. 302-328 Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso Valparaiso, Chile Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=175015282001 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res., 38(3): 302-328, 2010 Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res. 302 DOI: 10.3856/vol38-issue3-fulltext-1 Review Zoogeografía de los crustáceos decápodos chilenos marinos y dulceacuícolas Marco A. Retamal1 & Hugo I. Moyano2 1Departamento de Oceanografía, 2Departamento de Zoología Universidad de Concepción, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanográficas Casilla 160-C, Concepción, Chile RESUMEN. Sobre la base de 77 familias, más de 200 géneros y 431 especies que habitan aguas chilenas, se ha tratado de revelar el patrón zoogeográfico subyacente a estos taxa comparando áreas sobre la base del número de especies, géneros y familias que las comparten. Para obtener este patrón zoogeográfico se dividió la costa y las islas oceánicas en 16 áreas, que abarcan la mayor parte de la placa de Nazca, incluyendo la isla de Pascua, isla Salas y Gómez, islas Desventuradas y archipiélago de Juan Fernández, así como las cordilleras submarinas de Salas y Gómez y Nazca (5 áreas), la costa sudamericana occidental desde Arica (ca., 18ºS) hasta el cabo de Hornos (56ºS) (10 áreas) y la península Antártica y áreas adyacentes (1 área).
    [Show full text]
  • Zoosystema 32 (3) : 495-524
    King crabs up-close: ontogenetic changes in ornamentation in the family Lithodidae (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura), with a focus on the genus Paralomis Sally HALL Sven THATJE National Oceanography Centre, Southampton (NOCS), School of Ocean and Earth Science, University of Southampton, European Way, Southampton, SO14 3ZH (UK) [email protected] Hall S. & Thatje S. 2010. — King crabs up-close: ontogenetic changes in ornamentation in the family Lithodidae (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura), with a focus on the genus Paralomis. Zoosystema 32 (3) : 495-524. ABSTRACT In this study, we describe the carapace ornamentation found in species of Lithodidae (Decapoda, Anomura), focussing primarily on the genus Paralomis, which displays the greatest diversity of forms, globally. Evidence of ontogenetic change in the surface ornamentation of lithodids has previously been highlighted for one species of Paralomis (P. granulosa Jaquinot, 1847); however, its wider occurrence within the family has never been formally examined. Growth-related change in dorsal spines and tubercles was considered using growth-series from KEY WORDS eight species of Paralomis (P. mendagnai, S Pacifi c; P. multispina, N Pacifi c; Crustacea, Decapoda, P. spinosissima, P. granulosa, S Atlantic; P. inca, SE Pacifi c; P. erinacea, E Atlantic; Lithodidae, P. cubensis, Caribbean; P. stella, S Indian Ocean). Tubercular structures from adult Paralomis, specimens of 24 additional species of Paralomis are fi gured in order to provide a tubercle, spine, reference for future diagnosis. Th is study shows that ontogenetic changes should ontogeny. be considered when identifying specimens of Lithodidae to species level. RÉSUMÉ Gros plan sur les crabes royaux : changements ontogénétiques de l’ornementation dans la famille Lithodidae (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura), le cas du genre Paralomis.
    [Show full text]
  • SC5-DW01 Rev1 Cook Islands Proposal for an Exploratory Potting
    5th Meeting of the Scientific Committee Shanghai, China 23 - 28 September 2017 SC5-DW01_rev1 Cook Islands proposal for an exploratory potting fishery Ministry of Marine Resources 3 Aug 2017 (revised 21 Sept) SC5-DW01_rev1 Exploratory Fishing Application for Great Southern Fisheries Limited FV Great Southern To fish in South Pacific Regional Fisheries Organisation Management Area Targeting deep-water species of lobster and crab Dated 21st July 2017_revised Sept Page 1 of 35 3 Aug 2017 (revised 21 Sept) SC5-DW01_rev1 Overview This document is in addition to an application to the Ministry of Marine Resources (MMR), Rarotonga, Cook Islands for an authorisation for Great Southern Fisheries Limited, of Avarua, Rarotonga (GS) to utilise their vessel, the FV Great Southern to fish in the South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Area, outside of any previously established bottom fisheries footprint of the Cook Islands, in 2018, 2019 & 2020 initially and then subsequently as determined by MMR and the Scientific Committee (SC) and Commission of the South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (SPRFMO). This document seeks to comply with the application requirements of SPRFMO Conservation and Management Measure (CMM) 13-2016 and includes, in full, all information material to such application for consideration by the SPRFMO SC at its next meeting in September 2017 and thereafter by the Commission, when it meets in early 2018. This application contains in full the Fisheries Operation Plan as required by CMM 13-2016 for the 3 years of 2018, 1019 & 2020. The applicant, GS, acknowledges that since earlier exploratory and commercial voyages in the South Pacific with respect to the target species, that changes in respect of high seas management, in particular, the formation of SPRFMO, now mandate that interactions and footprints left on the environment are accounted for.
    [Show full text]
  • Texto Brito.P65
    Invest. Mar., Valparaíso, 30(1):Lithodidae 57-62, registrados 2002 frente a San Antonio, Chile central (Crustacea, Anomura) 57 Nota Científica Lithodidae registrados frente a San Antonio, Chile central (Crustacea, Anomura) José Luis Brito M. Museo Municipal de Ciencias Naturales y Arqueología de San Antonio Sanfuentes 2365, Barrancas, San Antonio, Chile E-mail: [email protected] Recibido: 21 septiembre 2001; versión corregida: 14 enero 2002; aceptado: 2 abril 2002 RESUMEN. Se entregan nuevos antecedentes sobre cinco especies de crustáceos lithodidos registrados en el talud continental de Chile central, que son Lithodes panamensis Faxon, 1893, Neolithodes diomedae (Benedict, 1894), Paralomis longipes Faxon, 1893, P. otsuae Wilson, 1990 y Glyptolithodes cristatipes (Faxon, 1893). Palabras claves: crustáceos lithodidos, San Antonio, Chile central. Lithodidae off San Antonio, central Chile (Crustacea, Anomura) ABSTRACT. New data about five species of crustaceans Lithodidae, recorded from Central Chile continental slope are given, Lithodes panamensis Faxon, 1893, Neolithodes diomedeae (Benedict, 1894), Paralomis longipes Faxon, 1893, P. otsuae Wilson, 1990 and Glyptolithodes cristatipes (Faxon, 1893). Keys words: Lithodid crustaceans, San Antonio, central Chilean. A la actualidad, se han registrado 15 especies de barco y recolección de ejemplares de varias espe- Lithodidae en aguas de la costa chilena, que son cies de crustáceos lithodidos. Lithodes santolla (Molina, 1782); L. wiracocha En este trabajo se analizan cinco ejemplares cap- Haig, 1974; L. panamensis Faxon, 1893; L. turkayi turados en actividades de pesca del bacalao entre MacPherson, 1988; L. confundens MacPherson, 1984 y 1990, que están depositados en la colección 1988; Glyptolithodes cristatipes (Faxon, 1893); del Museo Municipal de Ciencias Naturales y Ar- Paralomis granulosa (Jacquinot, 1847); P.
    [Show full text]