DOCSLIB.ORG

ROBOTS in ASIMOV's SHORT STORIES Majed S Allehaibi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ROBOTS in ASIMOV's SHORT STORIES Majed S Allehaibi MANSOURA UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ARTS ـــ THE NEW HUMAN: ROBOTS IN ASIMOV’S SHORT STORIES Majed S Allehaibi Prof. of American Literature and Intellectual History School of Arts and Humanities Jazan University- Saudi Arabia Journal of The Faculty of Arts- Mansoura University th 67 ISSUE- OUG. 2020 THE NEW HUMAN: ROBOTS IN ASIMOV’S SHORT STORIES Majed S Allehaibi Prof. of American Literature and Intellectual History School of Arts and Humanities Jazan University- Saudi Arabia Abstract This paper focuses on selected short stories of Isaac Asimov and discusses the progression of robots depicted in these stories from mere toys to sophisticated creatures. During their evolution from simple devices, and tools to sophisticated human-like creatures, robots become aware of their condition as slaves and of their superiority to human beings, their creators, and thus seek liberation and the creation of their own society. Keywords: Evolution, Robot, Utopia, Reason, Thinking, Robotic laws. ملخص البحث: Introduction positronic3 brains that provide them with a Thinking is a unique human quality; it is form of consciousness. Robots, thus, have what makes humans, in the Aristotelian three laws embedded in their consciousness. worldview, partly divine since they share Asimov lists them in his short story this quality with the divine this exercise of ―Runaround:‖ thinking1. However, in Isaac Asimov’s 1. A robot may not injure a human being, stories, robots share with humanity this or, through inaction, allow a human quality of thought and awareness of their being to come to harm. existence. Like humans, Asimov’s robots 2. A robot must obey orders given to it by learn from experience. In the context of his human beings except where such orders stories, the process of thinking evolves to would conflict with the First Law. become in some sense comparable to the 3. A robot must protect its own existence human soul. The robot evolves from simple as long as such protection does not thinking entity to a more complex being conflict with the First or Second Law. crowned by spirituality and religion2. (Asimov The Complete Robot 269-270) As part of Asimov’s paradigm, robots have 4 These laws lead robots to be effective and more caring about humans’ lives, in essence 1 The Aristotelian God is a mind thinking of itself. an idealization of the human consciousness. Phillip Cary writes, in his Augustine’s Invention In a story called "Evidence," Susan Calvin, of the Inner Self, ―Aristotle’s theology is famous a robopsychologist, describes how robots, for its central tenet that God is utterly separate the human creation, are better than most from the natural world and thinks of nothing but human beings, God's creation. In the itself: God is in fact defined as intellectual activity understanding itself. .‖ (21). following passage, she equates the robot to a 2 In this article, I use evolution in the sense of linear very good human being: progression from simple forms to more complex forms, not evolution in the sense of adaptation to environmental changes in which organisms acquire lucky variations that make them more 3 Asimov defines the positronic brain in ―Reason,‖ a likely to survive. These random variations allow short story, as ―calculated neuronic paths, which particular organisms to survive and reproduce, imbued each robot with what amounted to a pre- while other organisms that do not adapt fall into natal education‖ (294). extinction. The constant incremental 4 Later, Asimov added the Zeroth Law in his Prelude accumulation of these random modifications in to Foundation: "A robot may not harm humanity, response to external circumstances explains or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm‖ evolution in the Darwinian sense. (486). 3 JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ARTS 67th Issue – Oug . 2020 There are only two ways of definitely He gets used to this robot and develops proving Byerley to be a robot, sir . the affection for him. Similarly, the dog physical and the psychological. loves this boy and takes care of him. The Physically, you can dissect him or use an parents trust that their child will be safe X-ray. How to do that would be your as long as he is with the robotic dog. problem. Psychologically, his behavior One day, the parents decide to get their can be studied, for if he is a positronic child (who has never seen a living dog) a robot, he must conform to the three real dog. The boy’s answer is one of Rules of Robotics. A positronic brain bewilderment. He cannot grasp the cannot be constructed without them. difference between the robot and the real If Mr. Byerley breaks any of those three dog. His robotic dog is real to him. Also, rules, he is not a robot. Unfortunately, when he hears that he’ll be replaced, the this procedure works in only one robotic dog shows a sense of fear as a direction. If he lives up to the rules, it metallic squeaking. The boy says, proves nothing one way or the ―Robot isn’t an imitation, Dad, he is my other…because, if you stop to think of dog‖ (17). The robot convinces the boy it, the three Rules of Robotics are the that he can feel and is capable of essential guiding principles of a good developing emotional ties with the child. many of the world’s ethical systems. Of When the father finally agrees that the course, every human being is supposed boy may keep his dog, the dog squeaks to have the instinct of self-preservation. happily. That’s Rule Three to a robot. Also, Similarly, in the story ―Sally,‖ there are every ―good‖ human being, with a social a group of cars with positronic brains. conscience and a sense of responsibility, They form their own community of cars is supposed to defer to proper authority; and love their caretakers. One female car to listen to his doctor, his boss, his named Sally is fond of her caretaker and government, his psychiatrist, his fellow always accompanies him. There are no man; to obey laws, to follow rules, to secrets between them. She intensely conform to custom--even when they hates Raymond Gellhorn, a businessman interfere with his comfort or his safety. who tries to steal the brains of the cars That’s Rule Two to a robot. Also, every and put them in brand new bodies. Their ―good‖ human being is supposed to love caretaker Jack refuses the offers and others as himself, protect his fellow Sally ridicules the idea. She does not man, risk his life to save another. That’s need a driver and hates to be ridden. At Rule One to a robot. To put it simply--if that moment, Raymond Gellhorn Byerley follows all the Rules of forcibly rides her. This action fills her Robotics, he may be a robot, and may with a sense of revenge; it is comparable simply be a very good man. (529-530) to rape. By the end, the cars, along with Robots are, in a sense, made by humans the bus (the abused slave who hates his in the ideal image of the Human in the master and has enough reasons to human mind. In their perfection, they are destroy him), succeed in their plot to kill more human than the flesh-and-blood Raymond Gellhorn, and, to wash off humans. They are superior to humanity what is left of him, Sally offers to allow as we know it. They demonstrate the her caretaker to ride her. That is a human qualities of minds and soul, remark of conscience. She feels guilty reason and emotions. that she has not allowed him to ride her In Asimov’s ―A Boy's Best Friend,‖ before, and now she wants to make up a boy lives with his parents on the moon. for that. He has a robotic dog for a long while. In ―Someday,‖ a fairytale telling 4 THE NEW HUMAN: ROBOTS IN ASIMOV’S SHORT STORIES Majed S Allehaibi computer (Bard) is kept in seclusion acknowledges the superiority of robots? from what is going in the world. He "The Tercentenary Incident" tells the keeps repeating to his master the things story of a robot identical in image and he knew before, so he is ridiculed and behavior to that of a fictitious future abused by the boys for his uselessness United States president, Hugo Allen and for being dated. For the sake of Winkler. This robot finds that this experiment, Niccolo and Paul try to president is a "vote-grabber, a promiser," expand the Bard’s ―memory tape‖ by but that he failed to accomplish anything downloading an up-to-date book about during his first term in office (232). So, computers in to its mind (45). This book this robot outfoxed the humans by serves as the connection between Bard vaporizing the real president using the and the outside world, about what is disintegrator gun as he is ready to going on in the field of computers. deliver his tercentenary speech. A When Bard accidentally is turned on by moment later, the robot appears and tells one of the boys, he starts telling his own them that he is the real president. What story of suffering with a voice that the robot killed was a device, a ―carried a hint of passion in it, a trace of metaphorical robot in the guise of a near feeling‖ (51). He ends with ―the president. This robot gives an little computer knew then that computers outstanding speech; no one has ever would always grow wiser and more heard a speech with such power and powerful until someday—someday— assurance.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nanoelectronics the Original Positronic Brain?
    Nanoelectronics the Original Positronic Brain? Dan Hammerstrom Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Portland State University Maseeh College of Engineering 12/13/08 1 and Computer Science Wikipedia: “A positronic brain is a fictional technological device, originally conceived by science fiction writer Isaac Asimov “Its role is to serve as a central computer for a robot, and, in some unspecified way, to provide it with a form of consciousness recognizable to humans” How close are we? You can judge the algorithms, in this talk I will focus on hardware and what the future might hold Maseeh College of Engineering 12/13/08 Hammerstrom 2 and Computer Science Moore’s Law: The number of transistors doubles every 18-24 months No discussion of computing is complete without addressing Moore’s law The semiconductor industry has been following it for almost 30 years It is not really a physical law, but one of faith The fruits of a hyper-competitive $300 billion global industry Then there is Moore’s lesser known 2nd law st The 1 law requires exponentially increasing investment And what I call Moore’s 3rd law st The 1 law results in exponentially increasing design errata Maseeh College of Engineering 12/13/08 Hammerstrom 3 and Computer Science Intel is now manufacturing in their new, innovative 45 nm process Effective gate lengths of 37 nm (HkMG) And they recently announced a 32 nm scaling of the 45 nm process Transistors of this size are no longer acting like ideal switches And there are other problems … 45 nm Transistor
    [Show full text]
  • How Not to Succeed in Law School
    Essays How Not to Succeed in Law School James D. Gordon HIIt I. SHOULD You Go TO LAW SCHOOL? Would you like to help the less fortunate? Would you like to see liberty and justice for all? Do you want to vindicate the rights of the oppressed? If so, you should join the Peace Corps. The last thing you should do is attend law school. People basically hate lawyers, and with good reason. That's why you'll rarely escape from a dinner party without hearing at least one lawyer joke. Indeed, literature reveals that people have always hated lawyers. Samuel Coleridge wrote in The Devil's Thoughts: He saw a Lawyer killing a Viper On a dunghill hard by his own stable; t Professor of Law, Brigham Young University Law School. B.A. 1977, Brigham Young University; J.D. 1980, Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California, Berkeley. Just for the record (in case I am ever nominated for ajudicial appointment), I don't believe a word of this Essay. And if I do, I'm only being tentative. And if I'm not, I promise to let my colleagues dissuade me from my position shortly before the Senate confirmation hearings begin. After all, I watched the Bork hearings, too. I extend apologies and thanks to Dave Barry, Eliot A. Butler, Linda Bytof, Johnny Carson, Steven Chidester, Jesse H. Choper, Michael Cohen, Paul Duke, Vaughn J. Featherstone, J. Clifton Fleming, Jr., Frederick Mark Gedicks, Bruce C. Hafen, Carl S. Hawkins, Gregory Husisian, Brian C. Johnson, Edward L. Kimball, Jay Leno, Hans A.
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering Racial Integration in Teaneck, New Jersey, 1949 – 1968
    Reputation and Reality in America’s Model Town: Remembering Racial Integration in Teaneck, New Jersey, 1949 – 1968 Rachel Mark Senior Thesis Department of History, Columbia University April 4, 2011 Acknowledgements In ‟65 tension was running high at my high school/ There was a lot of fights between the black and white/There was nothing you could do…/ Troubled times had come to my hometown/ My hometown/ My hometown/ My hometown - Bruce Springsteen, “My Hometown” This thesis investigates how integration is remembered in Teaneck, NJ, the first town in the nation to vote for integrated schools. While I observe in this thesis that the reality of integration ultimately fell short of the goals set by the activists themselves, I do not wish to take away from these individuals and their honorable actions. In a time when the country faced fierce segregation and racism, a majority in Teaneck stepped up and voted for what they believed in their hearts was right: equal education. As a third generation Teaneck resident, I feel a close connection to this story. My grandparents still vividly remember casting their votes for integration, and my mother went to the central sixth grade school created as part of the original integration plan. And at the outset, I would like to thank my parents – Joseph and Meryl Mark – and grandparents – Abraham and Sheila Schlussel, and Norman and Frances Mark – for not just providing me with a topic for my thesis but also for instilling a love of education and learning that inspired me to undertake the project in the first place.
    [Show full text]
  • Adventuring with Books: a Booklist for Pre-K-Grade 6. the NCTE Booklist
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 311 453 CS 212 097 AUTHOR Jett-Simpson, Mary, Ed. TITLE Adventuring with Books: A Booklist for Pre-K-Grade 6. Ninth Edition. The NCTE Booklist Series. INSTITUTION National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, Ill. REPORT NO ISBN-0-8141-0078-3 PUB DATE 89 NOTE 570p.; Prepared by the Committee on the Elementary School Booklist of the National Council of Teachers of English. For earlier edition, see ED 264 588. AVAILABLE FROMNational Council of Teachers of English, 1111 Kenyon Rd., Urbana, IL 61801 (Stock No. 00783-3020; $12.95 member, $16.50 nonmember). PUB TYPE Books (010) -- Reference Materials - Bibliographies (131) EDRS PRICE MF02/PC23 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Annotated Bibliographies; Art; Athletics; Biographies; *Books; *Childress Literature; Elementary Education; Fantasy; Fiction; Nonfiction; Poetry; Preschool Education; *Reading Materials; Recreational Reading; Sciences; Social Studies IDENTIFIERS Historical Fiction; *Trade Books ABSTRACT Intended to provide teachers with a list of recently published books recommended for children, this annotated booklist cites titles of children's trade books selected for their literary and artistic quality. The annotations in the booklist include a critical statement about each book as well as a brief description of the content, and--where appropriate--information about quality and composition of illustrations. Some 1,800 titles are included in this publication; they were selected from approximately 8,000 children's books published in the United States between 1985 and 1989 and are divided into the following categories: (1) books for babies and toddlers, (2) basic concept books, (3) wordless picture books, (4) language and reading, (5) poetry. (6) classics, (7) traditional literature, (8) fantasy,(9) science fiction, (10) contemporary realistic fiction, (11) historical fiction, (12) biography, (13) social studies, (14) science and mathematics, (15) fine arts, (16) crafts and hobbies, (17) sports and games, and (18) holidays.
    [Show full text]
  • Brains, Minds, and Computers in Literary and Science Fiction Neuronarratives
    BRAINS, MINDS, AND COMPUTERS IN LITERARY AND SCIENCE FICTION NEURONARRATIVES A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. by Jason W. Ellis August 2012 Dissertation written by Jason W. Ellis B.S., Georgia Institute of Technology, 2006 M.A., University of Liverpool, 2007 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2012 Approved by Donald M. Hassler Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Tammy Clewell Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Kevin Floyd Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Eric M. Mintz Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Arvind Bansal Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Accepted by Robert W. Trogdon Chair, Department of English John R.D. Stalvey Dean, College of Arts and Sciences ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................ iv Chapter 1: On Imagination, Science Fiction, and the Brain ........................................... 1 Chapter 2: A Cognitive Approach to Science Fiction .................................................. 13 Chapter 3: Isaac Asimov’s Robots as Cybernetic Models of the Human Brain ........... 48 Chapter 4: Philip K. Dick’s Reality Generator: the Human Brain ............................. 117 Chapter 5: William Gibson’s Cyberspace Exists within the Human Brain ................ 214 Chapter 6: Beyond Science Fiction: Metaphors as Future Prep ................................. 278 Works Cited ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Liable Machines 7 CHAPTER 7
    Liable Machines 7 CHAPTER 7 After lighting a cigarette, Alfred Lanning, declared, “It reads minds all right.”1 Lanning was a recurrent character in Isaac Asimov’s science fiction. In this particular story, the director of a plant of U.S. Robots and Mechanical Men was talking about Her- bie, a robot with “a positronic brain of supposedly ordinary vintage.” Herbie had the ability to “tune in on thought waves,” leaving Lanning and his colleagues baffled by his ability to read minds. Herbie was “the most important advance in robotics in decades.” But neither Lanning nor his team knew how it happened. Lanning’s team included Peter Bogert, a mathematician and second-in-command to Lanning; Milton Ashe, a young officer at U.S. Robots and Mechanical Men; and Dr. Susan Calvin, a robopsychologist (who happened to be in love with Ashe). Lanning asked Dr. Calvin to study Herbie first. She sat down with the robot, who had recently finished reading a pile of science books. “It’s your fiction that interests me,” said Herbie. “Your studies of the interplay of human motives and emotions.” As Dr. Calvin listened, she begun to think about Milton Ashe. “He loves you,”—the robot whispered. 150 | LIABLE MACHINES “For a full minute, Dr. Calvin did not speak. She merely stared.” “You are mistaken! You must be. Why should he?” “But he does. A thing like that cannot be hidden, not from me.” Then he supported his statement with irresistible rationality: “He looks deeper than the skin and admires intellect in others. Milton Ashe is not the type to marry a head of hair and a pair of eyes.” She was convinced.
    [Show full text]
  • Law Is a Buyer's Market
    LAW IS A Buyer’s MARKET Building a Client-First Law Firm JORDAN FURLONG Cover design by Mark Delbridge Interior design by Patricia LaCroix Copyright © 2017 Jordan Furlong All rights reserved. No part or this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without express written consent of the author. Printed in the United States of America. 22 21 20 19 18 17 5 4 3 2 1 ISBN: 978-0-9953488-0-6 For Mom and Dad CONTENTS Acknowledgments .............................................................. vii Introduction ......................................................................... ix Prologue ...............................................................................xv Chapter 1: The End of the Seller’s Market in Law ............... 1 Chapter 2: The Emergence of Lawyer Substitutes ..............17 Chapter 3: The Development of Law Firm Substitutes ....... 33 Chapter 4: The Fall of the Traditional Law Firm ................ 55 Chapter 5: The Rise of the Post-Lawyer Law Firm ............. 69 Chapter 6: The Law Firm as a Commercial Enterprise ....... 83 Chapter 7: Identifying Your Law Firm’s Professional Purpose ............................................................ 95 Chapter 8: Choosing Your Law Firm’s Markets and Clients ...................................................... 107 Chapter 9: Creating a Strategy to Fulfill Your Firm’s Purpose ...........................................................121 Chapter 10: The Client Strategy ......................................... 129 Chapter 11: The Competitive
    [Show full text]
  • A Phenomenological Investigation Of
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Department of Adult Education “SEE EVERYTHING, HEAR WHAT IS NOT BEING SAID”: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF INTUITION IN NOVICE REGISTERED NURSING PRACTICE A Thesis in Adult Education by Lisa A. Ruth-Sahd © 2004 Lisa A. Ruth-Sahd Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Education May 2004 The thesis of Lisa A. Ruth-Sahd was reviewed and approved* by the following: Elizabeth Tisdell Associate Professor of Adult Education Thesis Advisor Chair of Committee Edward Taylor Associate Professor of Adult Education Helen Hendy Associate Professor of Psychology Holly Angelique Associate Professor of Community Psychology Ian Baptiste Associate Professor of Education In Charge of Graduate Programs in Adult Education *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. iii ABSTRACT Knowing is multifaceted and encompasses several different ways to process information. Ways of knowing that lay outside of the rational domain such as intuitive, spiritual, emotional, tacit, and unconscious knowing, have traditionally been ignored and silenced in the traditional obsession with objective, positivistic, and rationalistic knowing. In the field of nursing, it is recognized that in practice expert nurses use many different sources of knowledge too gain a holistic perspective of their patient situation, to guide their decision-making and inform patient care. Inclusion of novice nurses in previous research on intuition has been very limited. Therefore, the primary purpose of this interpretive Heideggarian phenomenological study was to discover the meaning of intuitive knowing to novice registered nurses. Secondly, it was intended to identify how the use of intuitive knowing impacts their practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Logan Brooks Journal Prompt #4: Technical Communication and Science Fiction
    Logan Brooks Journal Prompt #4: Technical Communication and Science Fiction I cannot call myself an avid reader, but I am a fan of the science fiction genre. To me, science fiction is a story or idea that assimilates popular and contemporary culture in a way that is magnificent and stunning to its audience at the time. In addition, science fiction tries to portray possible future technologies off of already existing technologies. There are numerous examples of this throughout literature and film. Take for example Isaac Asimov's I, Robot. The robots have “positronic brains”, devices that give them their “pre-natal education.” The positron was first discovered around the time Asimov wrote I, Robot. He took an already existing idea or technology and portrayed it in a way that sounded futuristic and interesting to his readers. Looking back, a positronic brain doesn't sound as interesting as it likely did in the 1950's. Positrons are part of quantum mechanics, so a positronic brain isn't that far- fetched I suppose. Star Trek is still popular to this day. It has retained its popularity not only through brilliant portrayals of futuristic technology, but also through memorable dialogue. “Live Long and Prosper” will likely invoke subconscious memories of Star Trek even by people who have never actually watched an episode. In addition, it took present day technologies (1960's) and portrayed them in a retro-futuristic way. The communicator was based off of land-line telephones, but portrayed a cell phone like quality, even down to the flip display. Also, Star Trek was very adamant on using their superior technology ethically and safely.
    [Show full text]
  • I-Robot Points for Understanding Answer
    Pre-intermediate Level Points for Understanding Answer Key I, Robot Isaac Asimov 1 a Harm: to injure, damage or have a bad effect on someone or something. This is important within the first law because robots are superior to humans and very powerful. If this rule did not exist, robots would be very dangerous. b Conflict: if different statements or suggestions conflict, they cannot all be right or they cannot all happen. This is important within the second and third laws because it makes sure robots obey c Protect: to keep someone or something safe. The process of keeping someone or something safe is called protection. This is important because a robot has to keep itself safe. 2 She’s a robot-psychologist. She is intelligent and has a plain face. She behaves coldly toward people and things around her, but robots excite her. 3 The reporter is interviewing Susan Calvin because he’s writing an article for The Interplanetary Press. He wants information about her involvement with robots. 2 a Gloria thinks Robbie is her friend because they play games together and she tells him stories. She is very upset when he is taken away. b Grace Weston is frightened of Robbie because she thinks he might hurt Gloria and she doesn’t want a machine looking after her daughter. c George Weston thinks Robbie is Gloria’s nanny and is unable to hurt Gloria he was made to be gentle and nice. 2 Mr Weston arranges for the family to go to New York because Gloria becomes very unhappy.
    [Show full text]
  • "Our Computer Goofed"
    June 9, 1975 Number 23 Almost since the rainy afternoon a cen- impossible for robots to harm humans), Pirsig tury ago when Mary Shelly began writing asserts that a smoothly functioning machine is Fmnkenstein Or the Modem Prometheus, both the product of a smoothly functioning mind, scientists and laymen have considered the re- implying that a berserk machine is the product volt of the machines not only likely but inevita- of a berserk mind. It is interesting that the ble. The idea of a creation destroying its creator distrust of machines called the “Frankenstein app=ls tothecollective wnseofpoetic justice. complex,” originally articulated in a work of After all, the argument goes, there are some fiction, has been so strongly attacked in subse- things which man was not meant to know. quent works of fiction. In order to make her story plausible, Ms. The pervasiveness of the “Frankenstein Shelly had her monster assembled with the aid complex” is demonstrated when a slightly of what were then the most recent scientific bored clerk replies to your incredulously ques- discoveries: brain surgery, organ trans- tioning an outrageous phone bill or bank state- plantation, and—most mysterious and power- ment with, “Our computer goofed.” This has ful of all-electricity. The basic myth has sur- become the fashionable excuse for hum.sn in- vived, but several transformations have competence and error. Instead of admitting, brought it more up to date. Nowadays the most “We made a mistake,” they blame the fantastic, mysterious, state-of-the-art technol- (probably innocent) machine. ogy is embodied in the computer, the new It is possible but hardly probable that the symbol of forbidden knowledge and pwer.
    [Show full text]
  • Writing a Moral Code: Algorithms for Ethical Reasoning by Humans and Machines
    religions Article Writing a Moral Code: Algorithms for Ethical Reasoning by Humans and Machines James McGrath 1,* ID and Ankur Gupta 2 1 Butler University, Department of Philosophy, Religion, and Classics, 4600 Sunset Avenue, Indianapolis, IN 46208, USA 2 Butler University, Department of Computer Science, 600 Sunset Avenue, Indianapolis, IN 46208, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-317-940-9364 Received: 31 July 2018; Accepted: 7 August 2018; Published: 9 August 2018 Abstract: The moral and ethical challenges of living in community pertain not only to the intersection of human beings one with another, but also our interactions with our machine creations. This article explores the philosophical and theological framework for reasoning and decision-making through the lens of science fiction, religion, and artificial intelligence (both real and imagined). In comparing the programming of autonomous machines with human ethical deliberation, we discover that both depend on a concrete ordering of priorities derived from a clearly defined value system. Keywords: ethics; Isaac Asimov; Jesus; Confucius; Socrates; Euthyphro; commandments; robots; artificial intelligence; programming; driverless cars 1. Introduction Ethical reasoning, when it is done effectively, involves prioritizing between competing options. Philosophical thought experiments such as the “trolley problem” highlight the human tendency to avoid making decisions about situations in which there is no good outcome. However, the history of both religion
    [Show full text]