DOCSLIB.ORG

Future Mobility 2050

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Future Mobility 2050 Augusta Regional Transportation Study FUTURE MOBILITY 2050 Draft Metropolitan Transportation Plan July 10, 2020 ARTS Draft 2050 MTP The Augusta Regional Transportation Study (ARTS) as a federally-designated agency was established as a bi-state Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) in 1970. The ARTS MPO working collaboratively with partner agencies is responsible for making policy about local transportation and deciding how to spend Federal funds for carrying out the transportation planning process. The ARTS MPO is also responsible for overseeing multimodal and long range transportation planning within the ARTS planning area to ensure continued accessibility, connectivity, efficiency, mobility, and safety for the movement of people and freight. The ARTS planning area includes Richmond County, and the Cities of Hephzibah and Blythe in Georgia; the Fort Gordon Military Reservation; parts of Columbia County, including the City of Grovetown; and, parts of Aiken and Edgefield Counties in South Carolina, including the Cities of Aiken, North Augusta, New Ellenton and Burnettown. ARTS METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE Future Mobility 2050 Augusta Regional Transportation Study 535 Telfair Street, Suite 300 Augusta GA 30901 706.821.1796 [email protected] www.augustaga.gov/680/ARTS-Metropolitan-Planning-Organization The Augusta Regional Transportation Study (ARTS) Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is committed to enforcing the principle that “No person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, age, sex (including gender identity and expression), marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, political beliefs, genetic information, reprisal, national origin, or disability, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, and any other related non-discrimination Civil Rights laws and authorities under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.” The ARTS MPO is also committed to taking positive and realistic affirmative steps to ensure the protection of rights and opportunities for all persons affected by its plans and programs. The opinions, findings, and conclusions in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the Department of Transportation, State of Georgia, State of South Carolina or the Federal Highway Administration. Prepared in cooperation with the Georgia Department of Transportation, South Carolina Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. ii ARTS Draft 2050 MTP Planning & Development Department Robert H. Sherman III, Director ARTS Future Mobility 2050 – Metropolitan Transportation Plan A Blueprint supporting Regional Population and Economic Growth The Augusta Planning and Development Department (APDD) recently completed a 12-month metropolitan transportation planning process – Future Mobility 2050. The Future Mobility 2050 Metropolitan Transportation plan (MTP) updated the 2040 Transportation Vision Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) for the Augusta Regional Transportation Study (ARTS). ARTS is the regional Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), serving Richmond and Columbia counties in Georgia, and Aiken and Edgefield counties in South Carolina. In September 2020, elected officials from Augusta Richmond County, Columbia County, Blythe, Grovetown, Hephzibah in Georgia; and, the City of Aiken, City of North Augusta, Burnettown, City of New Ellenton and Aiken County in South Carolina; along with the Georgia Department of Transportation and South Carolina Department of Transportation, as the ARTS Policy Committee plans to adopt this plan. ARTS Future Mobility 2050 MTP, as a regional blueprint and policy guide for future transportation infrastructure, recommends multi-modal transportation capital improvements over the next thirty (30) years. With the establishment of the National Cyber Command at Fort Gordon, UNISYS expansion in downtown Augusta, and Project Jackson in North Augusta; the Augusta-Richmond GA and Aiken SC Metro Area is projected to grow 35% in population and 31% in employment opportunities over the next thirty years. The region is estimated to receive $3.1 billion, in federal, state and local funds for transportation infrastructure over the next 30 years which will be used for transportation improvements in Richmond and Columbia Counties in Georgia and Aiken and Edgefield Counties in South Carolina. The recommended transportation improvements include highways/roads, traffic safety and maintenance, traffic signal operations, bridge, freight and railroad, public transit, pedestrian and bike paths. During the planning process, APDD conducted a successful public participation process across the region reaching diverse groups of people, chambers of commerce, environmental, business, and non-profit organizations. A total of 1,624 persons participated in the transportation planning process. The Augusta Planning and Development Department acknowledges the work of various departments within the City of Augusta, and participation of our regional partnerships with the Georgia Department of Transportation, South Carolina Department of Transportation, Aiken County, Columbia County, Edgefield County, Lower Savannah Council of Governments, the public and other agencies to develop this plan. This partnership of collaborative effort aims to ensure our regional transportation system provides safe, accessible and efficient mobility for all travelers, regional economic growth and enhance the quality of life. With warmest regards, Robert H. Sherman III, ARTS MPO Director iii ARTS Draft 2050 MTP Table of Contents A Note to Readers ................................................................................................................................................... xi Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................... xii List of Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................... xvi 1 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Augusta Regional Transportation Study (ARTS) .............................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 2050 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) ................................................................................................ 1-3 1.3 Demographics and Future Trends ..................................................................................................................... 1-6 1.4 Environmental Justice Considerations ............................................................................................................ 1-18 1.5 Land Use ............................................................................................................................................................. 1-28 2 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ............................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Public Involvement Process ............................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 First Round of Public Engagement ..................................................................................................................... 2-2 2.3 Second Round of Public Engagement ................................................................................................................ 2-5 3 2050 MTP GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES ........................................................... 3-1 3.1 Performance Based Planning ............................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 National Guidance & Historical Context ........................................................................................................... 3-2 3.3 Statewide Goals.................................................................................................................................................... 3-3 3.4 Federally Mandated Performance Measures & Targets ................................................................................... 3-4 3.5 Community Vision .............................................................................................................................................. 3-8 3.6 Goals, Objectives, and Performance Evaluation Criteria ............................................................................... 3-11 4 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION NETWORK NEEDS ..................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Commute Statistics ............................................................................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Summary of Needs .............................................................................................................................................. 4-5 4.3 Roads and Highways ........................................................................................................................................... 4-9 4.4 Aviation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • York County, South Carolina Facts
    News for Immediate Release Contact: Sonja Burris 803-329-5200 [email protected] York County, South Carolina Facts Settled: The earliest known inhabitants of York County, SC were the Catawba Indians. The first European settlers were the Scots-Irish from Pennsylvania and Virginia. The county was officially established in 1785. County History: From 1772 until the end of the Revolutionary War the area was known as the New Acquisition and ran approximately eleven miles north-to-south and sixty- five miles from east-to-west. In 1785, York County became one of the original counties in the newly-created state. The section of South Carolina known as the “New Acquisition” was the scene of significant activity during the American Revolution. The Battles of Williamson’s Plantation (Huck’s Defeat) and Kings Mountain were both fought on York County soil. York County as a whole experienced significant growth during the antebellum years, and the increase occurred primarily among the black population. As the importance of cotton grew, so did slavery become an integral part of the economic life of the county. The antebellum period saw the establishment and growth of several rural settlement areas and communities in York County. Key to York County’s mid- nineteenth-century growth was the arrival in the eastern part of the county of the Charlotte and South Carolina Railroad, opened in 1852. Beginning in the 1880s, the textile industry became increasingly important, and by the 1950s it was the largest employer in the county. Railroads and textiles also spurred the development of Rock Hill and Fort Mill, which are now the largest cities in the county.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Guidebook As .Pdf
    CAROLINA GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY FIELD TRIP GUIDEBOOK November 13 – 15, 1992 GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF THE CENTRAL SAVANNAH RIVER AREA, SOUTH CAROLINA AND GEORGIA edited by Wallace Fallaw Department of Geology, Furman University, Greenville, SC 29613 Van Price Environmental Monitoring section, Westinghouse Savannah River Co., Aiken SC 29808 Front cover: Topography of the Central Savannah River Valley and surrounding area looking up-river. Copies of this guidebook can be obtained from: South Carolina Geological Survey Harbison Forest Road Columbia, South Carolina 29210-4089 ii WE THANK THESE CORPORATE SPONSORS FOR THEIR SUPPORT OF THE 1992 CAROLINA GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY MEETING J.H. HUBER CORPORATION Langley, South Carolina KENNECOTT RIDGEWAY MINING COMPANY Ridgeway, South Carolina RMT, INC. Greenville, South Carolina SOUTHEASTERN CLAY COMPANY Aiken, South Carolina GERAGHTY AND MILLER INC. Aiken, South Carolina FOSTER DIXIANA CORP. Columbia, South Carolina EXPLORATION RESOURCES INC. Athens, Georgia The United States Department of Energy and the South Carolina Geological Survey provided partial support for this guidebook. However, the opinions and interpretations expressed within are not necessarily those of the Department of Energy or the South Carolina Geological Survey. iii CONTENTS Road Log and Outcrops in the vicinity of the Savannah River Site (W.C. Fallaw, Van Price and Walter J. Sex- ton) . .. .1 Observations on general allo-stratigraphy and tectonic framework of the southeastern Atlantic Coast Regional Cross Section (DNAG E-5 Corridor) Georgia and South Carolina as they relate to the Savan- nah River Site. (Donald Colquhoun). .. .11 Outline of stratigraphy at the Savannah River Site. (W. C. Fallaw and Van Price) . .17 Stratigraphic relationships in Eocene out crops along Upper Three Runs at the Savannah River Site.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional and County Population Change in North Carolina
    Regional and County Population Change in North Carolina A Summary of Trends from April 1, 2010 through July 1, 2016 North Carolina Office of State Budget and Management December 2017 Introduction The following document summarizes population trends for North Carolina using the certified county population estimates produced by the North Carolina Office of State Budget and Management (OSBM) released in September of 2017. These certified population estimates are as of July 1, 2016.1 Additional population tables that include statistics for all 100 counties can be obtained from https://www.osbm.nc.gov/demog/county‐estimates.2 Highlights: North Carolina grew by 620,254 people between April 1, 2010 and July 1, 2016, a 6.5% increase; Three of every four people added in this period were living in central North Carolina3; 95% of all growth occurred within metropolitan counties4; Among regional planning areas, only the Upper Coastal Plain Council of Governments experienced population decline; The fastest growing metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) since April 1, 2010 were the North Carolina portion of the Myrtle Beach‐Conway‐North Myrtle Beach MSA, the Raleigh MSA, the North Carolina portion of the Charlotte‐Concord‐Gastonia MSA, and the Wilmington MSA. Only the Rocky Mount MSA experienced population decline since the last census, losing 4,460 people (a 2.9% decline); The Charlotte‐Concord‐Gastonia MSA remains the largest metropolitan area in the state (at 2.1 million people); Mecklenburg (1.1 million) and Wake (1.0 million) Counties remain
    [Show full text]
  • Spouse Puts New Value in Rocks Can Leverage Both Richmond and Columbia Counties’ Current by LAURA LEVERING to Someone’S Face,” Allissa Said
    LOOK INSIDE: St. Patrick’s Day Shuffle - Page 7 Friday, March 17, 2017 | Vol. 3, No. 11 Published for the Department of Defense and the Fort Gordon community FORTGORDONGLOBE.COM CRAFTSMAN’S PASSION Poor credit can lead to big problems BY LAURA LEVERING “There could be something Fort Gordon Public Affairs Office on the report that doesn’t be- long to you, so reviewing it Financial readiness is a lot gives you a chance to check it like driving an automobile. before applying and potentially If you don’t perform regular being turned down for a credit preventative maintenance, it’s card or loan,” explained Bar- bound to cause problems. bara Brown, personal financial In the case of finances, check- readiness specialist, Financial ing one’s credit report is pre- Readiness Program, Army ventative maintenance. Community Service. Credit reports and credit Credit reports are a detailed re- scores are different but di- port of a person’s debt history, in- rectly affect one another. By quiries about credit applications, law, individuals have an op- personal address and places of portunity to review their credit employment. In most cases, debt report three times a year. It’s seven years and older disappears the first thing a person should from credit reports and gets sent do before applying for a credit to a third party collections agen- card or taking out a loan for cy, which then tries to collect large items such as a car or the debt on behalf of company. house. Other cases may take longer and Consumers can request a free require action to disappear.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Piedmont in the Savage and Relay Quadrangles, Howard, Baltimore, and Anne Arundel Counties, Maryland
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Geologic Map of the Piedmont in the Savage and Relay Quadrangles, Howard, Baltimore, and Anne Arundel Counties, Maryland By Avery Ala Drake, Jr.1 Open-File Report 98-757 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 'Reston, VA 1998 GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE PIEDMONT IN THE SAVAGE AND RELAY QUADRANGLES, HOWARD, BALTIMORE, AND ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTIES, MARYLAND by Avery Ala Drake, Jr. INTRODUCTION The Piedmont in the Savage and Relay quadrangles (fig. 1) is largely in Howard County, Maryland. The northeasternmost part is in Baltimore County, Maryland and about 0.03 square miles is in Anne Arundel County. Most of the area is suburban and almost all outcrops are restricted to the Patapsco, Middle Patuxent, Little Patuxent, and other stream valleys. Crystalline rocks of the central Appalachian Piedmont within these quadrangles are overlain in many places by Coastal Plain deposits of Cretaceous age. Alluvium occurs along most streams. The geology of adjacent quadrangles on the west and south has been mapped by Drake (in press, unpublished data, 1991-1997) and J.N. Roen and A.A. Drake, Jr. (in press), and that to the north and east by Crowley (1976). The tectonics of the area were interpreted by Crowley (1976) and Drake (1995). Aeromagnetic and gravity surveys of the area were interpreted by Bromery (1968).
    [Show full text]
  • CSRA REGIONAL PLAN 2035 Regional Assessment Stakeholder Involvement Program
    CSRA REGIONAL PLAN 2035 Regional Assessment Stakeholder Involvement Program CSRA Regional Plan 2035 Table of Contents A. Regional Assessment 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………….…..4 2. Potential Regional Issues and Opportunities………………………………………………..……….8 2.1 Population…….……………………………………………………………………………….....8 2.2 Housing…………………………………………………………………………………………...9 2.3 Economic Development………………………………………………………………….……9 2.4 Land Use………………………………………………………………………………………..10 2.5 Transportation and Community Facilities……………………………………………….11 2.6 Natural and Environmental Resources……………………………………………………12 2.7 Intergovernmental Coordination…………………………………………………………..12 3. Regional Development Patterns………………………………………………………………………14 3.1 Projected Development Patterns…………………………………………………………..15 3.2 Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………17 3.3 Areas Requiring Special Attention………………………………………………………...17 4. Supporting Data………………………………………………………………………………………….21 4.1 Population………………………………………………………………………………………21 4.2 Housing………………………………………………………………………………………....25 4.3 Economic Development………………………………………………………………………27 4.4 Land Use………………………………………………………………………………………...50 4.5 Transportation and Community Facilities………………………………………………..52 4.6 Natural and Environmental Resources……………………………………………………58 B. Stakeholder Involvement Program………………………………………..…………………………74 C. Regional Agenda (pending) Appendix: Analysis of Quality Community Objectives……………………………………………..79 Regional Assessment and Stakeholder Involvement Program | CSRA Regional Commission | 1 CSRA Regional Plan
    [Show full text]
  • Census Bureau Population Estimates for North Carolina Metropolitan and Micropolitan Areas and Counties
    Census Bureau Population Estimates for North Carolina Metropolitan and Micropolitan Areas and Counties North Carolina had the 4th largest numeric change between April 1, 2010 and July 1, 2018, and many of the state’s metropolitan and micropolitan areas are the largest and fastest growing in the nation, according to the latest population estimates released by the U.S. Census Bureau on April 18, 2019. The majority (57%) of North Carolina’s 100 counties grew during this same period – with the largest numeric and percentage growth occurring in metropolitan counties in the state – particularly those in the Piedmont and along the coast (Figure 1). Between 2017 and 2018, 71 of North Carolina’s 100 counties grew. This compares to 55 percent of all counties nationwide. Brunswick County was the 9th fastest growing county in the nation (4th among counties with populations of 20,000 or more). Population increases in the state and for most counties during this decade has remained slower than the change that occurred between 2000 and 2010 (on an annualized basis). Only in four counties is the rate of growth faster than what was experienced in the previous decade: Durham, Gaston, and Yancey Counties. These counties have added more people in the 8 1/4 years since the last Census as they did in the previous decade. This report summarizes the Census Bureau’s latest population estimates. The State of North Carolina and many counties, municipalities and other organizations are now working to ensure a complete count of the total population in North Carolina on April 1, 2020 – the count date for the next decennial census.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina Landform Regions (And Facts About Landforms) Earth Where Is South Carolina? North America United States of America SC
    SCSouth Carolina Landform Regions (and facts about Landforms) Earth Where is South Carolina? North America United States of America SC Here we are! South Carolina borders the Atlantic Ocean. SC South Carolina Landform Regions Map Our state is divided into regions, starting at the mountains and going down to the coast. Can you name these? Blue Ridge Mountains Landform Regions SC The Blue Ridge Mountain Region is only 2% of the South Carolina land mass. Facts About the Blue Ridge Mountains . ◼ It is the smallest of the landform regions ◼ It includes the state’s highest point: Sassafras Mountain. ◼ The Blue Ridge Mountains are part of the Appalachian Mountain Range Facts About the Blue Ridge Mountains . ◼ The Blue Ridge Region is mountainous and has many hardwood forests, streams, and waterfalls. ◼ Many rivers flow out of the Blue Ridge. Blue Ridge Mountains, SC Greenville Spartanburg Union Greenwood Rock Hill Abbeville Piedmont Landform Regions SC If you could see the Piedmont Region from space and without the foliage, you would notice it is sort of a huge plateau. Facts About the Piedmont Region . ◼ The Piedmont is the largest region of South Carolina. ◼ The Piedmont is often called The Upstate. Facts About the Piedmont Region . ◼ It is the foothills of the mountains and includes rolling hills and many valleys. ◼ Piedmont means “foot of the mountains” ◼ Waterfalls and swift flowing rivers provided the water power for early mills and the textile industry. Facts About the Piedmont Region . ◼ The monadnocks are located in the Piedmont. ◼ Monadnocks – an isolated or single hill made of very hard rock.
    [Show full text]
  • SP20 Delaware Piedmont Geology
    Delaware Piedmont Geology including a guide to the rocks of Red Clay Valley RESEARCH DELAWARE SERVICEGEOLOGICAL SURVEY EXPLORATION Delaware Geological Survey University of Delaware Special Publication No. 20 By Margaret O. Plank and William S. Schenck 106/1500/298/C Delaware Piedmont Geology Including a guide to the rocks of Red Clay Valley Delaware Geological Survey University of Delaware Special Publication No. 20 Margaret O. Plank and William S. Schenck 1998 Contents FOREWORD . v INTRODUCTION . vii Acknowledgments . viii BASIC FACTS ABOUT ROCKS . 1–13 Our Earth . 1 Crust . 1 Mantle . 2 Core. 2 Plate Tectonics . 3 Minerals . 5 Rocks . 6 Igneous Rocks . 6 Sedimentary Rocks. 8 Metamorphic Rocks . 9 Deformation. 11 Time . 12 READING THE ROCKS: A HISTORY OF THE DELAWARE PIEDMONT . 15–29 Geologic Setting . 15 Piedmont . 15 Fall Line. 17 Atlantic Coastal Plain. 17 Rock Units of the Delaware Piedmont . 20 Wilmington Complex . 20 Wissahickon Formation . 21 Setters Formation & Cockeysville Marble . 22 Geologic Map for Reference . 23 Baltimore Gneiss . 24 Deformation in the Delaware Piedmont . 24 The Piedmont and Plate Tectonics . 27 Red Clay Valley: Table of Contents iii A GUIDE TO THE ROCKS ALONG THE TRACK . 31–54 Before We Begin . 31 Geologic Points of Interest . 31 A Southeast of Greenbank . 35 B Workhouse Quarry at Greenbank. 36 C Red Clay Creek and Brandywine Springs Park . 36 D Brandywine Springs to Faulkland Road . 38 E Hercules Golf Course . 39 F Rock Cut at Wooddale . 40 G Wissahickon Formation at Wooddale. 43 H Quarries at Wooddale. 43 I Red Clay Creek Flood Plain . 44 J Mount Cuba . 44 K Mount Cuba Picnic Grove .
    [Show full text]
  • Augusta Regional Transportation Study
    AUGUSTA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION STUDY y w H E e d ll i g v e e it f i y n e a l w r d G H H ld a O w i y b m u l Old Evans Rd o C Edgefield d §20 Line Rd T ¨ y ubm s R Trolle an Rd Mcmanu y R d r u a d e y H Richland Av AIKEN d d M R R a r i h s o a c W l n e a ot P s B h N k i n S w Wagener Rd g N ud H y t e lo o w i n v t i L c Rd F ak h F 520 e R c ¨§ o u d r W c C y k h s arl F es P to e n H r k r w y w y R y o a Co d lumbi Jefferson Davis Hwy a Rd Pkw ch y R at i W rw NORTH BURNETTOWN c ive h h R d a i R H r s a u d k W t e ashi AUGUSTA s b s ngton u e o y R r n d g R E Au C s Palmetto Pkwy d M l a L 20 a ¨§ a y k r ti e n R R to w d d n AUGUSTA R d ¨§20 Broad St Walton Way Wrig ht d sboro R R Aiken 11th St f d f Wrightsboro Rd u 520 l ¨§ B Columbia Sa r nd A e t B o ilv a m d r S i R F c e R h rry rc d u R S h to C d rm ll P e i B n ra B e n ch e GROVETOWN L Rd im Go y o h rdo w g Gordon Hwy n H C R d Main St ¨§520 W illis ton NEW Rd ELLENTON A to m ic d R R d e g d ri B ns ea D d R g n i r FORT p Tobacco Rd S r Doug Barnard Pkwy o GORDON s d n i W Mi k e Will d P is For nR a e ma d g e tt H w y Highway 88 HEPHZIBAH d idge R Deans Br BLYTHE Peach Orchard Rd Richmond S t o r e y M i l l R d TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2015 – 2018 AMENDED – MARCH 3, 2016 SEPTEMBER 2, 2015 Prepared By: Augusta Planning & Development Department In Cooperation With: Aiken County Planning And Development Department Lower Savannah Council of Governments Georgia Department Of Transportation South Carolina Department Of Transportation AUGUSTA REGIONAL
    [Show full text]
  • Data Sheet United States Department of the Interior National Park Service ^National Register of Historic Places Z** Inventory -- Nomination Form
    Form No, 10-300 (Rev. 10-74) DATA SHEET UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ^NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Z** INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOWTO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS I NAME HISTORIC Eh^Thomas^Carr 'District AND/OR COMMON LOCATION /u STREET & NUMBER Near fcke* inter section of ~4*&gfawa-y 150 and - * • -- ^^u—£***eM^:**"a^WJC%t:S1-furc>"" *• *w**%» _ NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN , ; - - - - CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT : Thomson - 2L VICINITY OF 10th - Robert; G. Stephens, Jr, • - STATE, .CODE .... COUNTY - ; . CODE Georgia 13 - McDuff ie 189 HCLASSIFI CATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE X_D'ISTRICT ^.PUBLIC X-OCCUPIED • " _ AGRICULTURE _ MUSEUM . — BUJLDING(S) . ^.PRIVATE ^-UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL "—PARK —STRUCTURE —BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS ' —EDUCATIONAL X-PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE ; . PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT ^RELIGIOUS •—OBJECT ._ IN PROCESS X-YES: RESTRICTED - • - —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED — YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL - —TRANSPORTATION " • : ; —NO —MILITARY ^ - —OTHER: WNER OF PROPERTY NAME Multiple owners STREET & NUMBER CITY, TOWN STATE Thomson X_ VICINITY OF . Georgia COURTHOUSE. ' " REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC. County Courthouse STREET & NUMBER CITY. TOWN STATE • ' Thomson Georgia I REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE None : DATE —FEDERAL ; _STATE —COUNTY : —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS CITY, TOWN STATE DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED —UNALTERED X.ORIGINALSITE X-GOOD —RUINS X.ALTERED —MOVED DATE- —FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE Within the Thomas Carr District, a part of the original late eighteenth and early nineteenth century Carr Plantation, are the Simpson House, the Bonier house, the E. V.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Piedmont Forests
    Spring 2009 Guide to Delaware Vegetation Communities Robert Coxe Guide to Delaware Vegetation Communities-Spring 2009 Acknowledgments I would like to acknowledge the contributions and help from the following people for this edition of the Guide to Delaware Vegetation Communities. Karen Bennett, Greg Moore and Janet Dennis of the Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife Bill McAvoy of the Delaware Natural Heritage Program Dr. John Kartesz of the Biota of North America Program Dr. Keith Clancy and Pete Bowman, Ecologists, formerly of the Delaware Natural Heritage Program Ery Largay and Leslie Sneddon of Natureserve All people unmentioned who made countless contributions to this document. -Take me to the vegetation community keys- Guide to Delaware Vegetation Communities-Spring 2009 Introduction The Guide to Delaware Vegetation Communities is intended to provide a Delaware flavor to the National Vegetation Classification System (NVCS). All common names of communities, except for those not in the NVCS, follow the NVCS. This document is designed for the web and CD only, but desired sections can be printed by users. In this matter, paper and therefore trees can be preserved and impacts to the communities discussed within can be minimized. In spirit of saving these communities please only print those community descriptions that you will use or print none at all. The State of Delaware covers 1,524,863.4 acres of which 1,231,393.6 acres are terrestrial and 293,469.8 acres are water (Table 1). Currently 130 vegetation communities are known to occur in Delaware. Some of the largest vegetation communities/land covers in the state include: Table 1.
    [Show full text]