Regional and County Population Change in North Carolina

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Regional and County Population Change in North Carolina Regional and County Population Change in North Carolina A Summary of Trends from April 1, 2010 through July 1, 2016 North Carolina Office of State Budget and Management December 2017 Introduction The following document summarizes population trends for North Carolina using the certified county population estimates produced by the North Carolina Office of State Budget and Management (OSBM) released in September of 2017. These certified population estimates are as of July 1, 2016.1 Additional population tables that include statistics for all 100 counties can be obtained from https://www.osbm.nc.gov/demog/county‐estimates.2 Highlights: North Carolina grew by 620,254 people between April 1, 2010 and July 1, 2016, a 6.5% increase; Three of every four people added in this period were living in central North Carolina3; 95% of all growth occurred within metropolitan counties4; Among regional planning areas, only the Upper Coastal Plain Council of Governments experienced population decline; The fastest growing metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) since April 1, 2010 were the North Carolina portion of the Myrtle Beach‐Conway‐North Myrtle Beach MSA, the Raleigh MSA, the North Carolina portion of the Charlotte‐Concord‐Gastonia MSA, and the Wilmington MSA. Only the Rocky Mount MSA experienced population decline since the last census, losing 4,460 people (a 2.9% decline); The Charlotte‐Concord‐Gastonia MSA remains the largest metropolitan area in the state (at 2.1 million people); Mecklenburg (1.1 million) and Wake (1.0 million) Counties remain the largest counties in the state. These two counties each added over 125,000 between 2010 and 2016; Two‐thirds of North Carolina counties added population between 2010 and 2016; Brunswick County was the fastest growing county in the state, adding 20,319 people – a 18.9% increase; Mecklenburg, Wake and Brunswick Counties experienced the largest net migration during this period, adding 81,018, 77,315, and 21,474 net migrants, respectively; 31 counties grew as a result of both natural increase (more births than deaths) and net in‐migration (more people moving into than leaving a county); and 20 counties lost population as a result of both natural decrease (more deaths than births) and net out‐migration (more people leaving a county than moving in). 1 Population Change by Region North Carolina continues to experience population growth, but population growth is not distributed equally throughout the state. The largest population increases occurred in central North Carolina and within metropolitan counties. Between April 1, 2010 and July 1, 2016, North Carolina added 620,254 people, an increase of 6.5% increase. The largest numeric and percentage increase occurred within the central portion of North Carolina (see Table 1 and Figure 1), where three of every four people added to North Carolina during this period were living. The slowest growth occurred within western North Carolina, which added 46,653 people. Ninety‐five percent of population growth during this period occurred within metropolitan counties. Over a half million people were added to metropolitan counties between 2010 and 2016. By July 1, 2016, there were 7.9 million people living in metropolitan counties in North Carolina – up from 7.3 million in 2010. At the same time, the population in non‐metropolitan counties grew by just 28,236 or 1.3 percent. By 2016, there were 2.2 million people living in non‐metropolitan areas of North Carolina. Table 1. Regional Population Change, April 1, 2010 – July 1, 2016 Total Population Change No. County April 1, 2010 July 1, 2016 Numeric Percent 33 Central North Carolina 5,394,430 5,850,876 456,446 8.5 41 Eastern North Carolina 2,741,090 2,858,245 117,155 4.3 26 Western North Carolina 1,400,168 1,446,821 46,653 3.3 46 Metropolitan* 7,336,591 7,928,609 592,018 8.1 54 Non‐Metropolitan 2,199,097 2,227,333 28,236 1.3 100 State 9,535,688 10,155,942 620,254 6.5 Source: North Carolina OSBM, Standard Population Estimates, Vintage 2016. *Metropolitan counties as defined by U.S. OMB, 2015. 1 See the technical documentation at https://www.osbm.nc.gov/demog/county‐estimates for details on the methodologies employed in the population estimates. 2 OSBM also prepares county population projections for North Carolina counties as well as standard and certified population estimates for municipalities. The data is available on the OSBM website (https://www.osbm.nc.gov/facts‐figures/demographics) or can be obtained by contacting the State Demographer, Dr. Mike Cline ([email protected] or 919‐807‐4756). 3 Three regions have been defined here for descriptive purposes only. 4 Metropolitan counties as define by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget in 2013. See the Appendix for a listing of all North Carolina Metropolitan Statistical Areas and component counties. 2 Figure 1. July 1, 2016 Population and April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2016 Population Change in North Carolina Regions 3 Population Change by Planning Region All regional planning areas except one experienced population growth from 2010 to 2016 (see Table 2 and Figure 2). The Upper Coastal Plain Council of Governments in northeastern North Carolina lost 7,709 people between April 1, 2010 and July 1, 2016, a 2.5 percent decrease. Slow growth of less than one percent was experienced within the Isothermal Planning and Development Commission (0.5%), Lumber River Council of Governments (0.4%), and Western Piedmont Council of Governments (0.4%). The three planning regions with the most rapid growth included: the Centralina Council of Governments (10.6%), the Triangle J Council of Governments (12.1%) and the Cape Fear Council of Governments region (11.3%). These represent two of our most urban areas of the state (the Charlotte and Raleigh‐Durham areas) and a rapidly urbanizing area (the Wilmington area). Table 3 ranks planning regions in the state according to percentage population change from April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2016. Table 2. Planning Region Population Change, April 1, 2010 – July 1, 2016 Total Population Change Rank by April 1, July 1, Percent Planning Region 2010 2016 Numeric Percent Change Albemarle Commission 171,975 175,103 3,128 1.8 11 Cape Fear Council of Governments 420,425 467,999 47,574 11.3 2 Centralina Council of Governments 1,968,624 2,177,385 208,761 10.6 3 Eastern Carolina Council of Governments 632,997 654,635 21,638 3.4 8 High Country Council of Governments 209,965 215,071 5,106 2.4 10 Isothermal Planning and Development 231,379 232,487 1,108 0.5 13 Commission Kerr‐Tar Council of Governments 223,981 229,672 5,691 2.5 9 Land‐of‐Sky Regional Council 398,911 428,909 29,998 7.5 4 Lumber River Council of Governments 299,095 300,239 1,144 0.4 14 Mid‐Carolina Council of Governments 497,606 522,106 24,500 4.9 5 Mid‐East Commission 286,391 290,986 4,595 1.6 12 Piedmont Triad Council of Governments 1,640,858 1,701,154 60,296 3.7 7 Southwestern Commission 194,099 202,990 8,891 4.6 6 Triangle J Council of Governments 1,683,230 1,887,213 203,983 12.1 1 Upper Coastal Plain Council of Governments 310,338 302,629 ‐7,709 ‐2.5 16 Western Piedmont Council of Governments 365,814 367,364 1,550 0.4 15 State 9,535,688 10,155,942 620,254 6.5 Source: North Carolina OSBM, Standard Population Estimates, Vintage 2016. 4 Figure 2. April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2016 Population Change in North Carolina Planning Regions 5 Population Change by Metropolitan Statistical Area The fastest growing metropolitan areas were in recreational destinations along the coast and within the most urbanized areas in the central Piedmont (see Table 3). Brunswick County, which is part of the Myrtle Beach metropolitan area, had the fastest growth among North Carolina metropolitan areas at 18.9 percent (or 20,319 people). This was followed by the Raleigh metropolitan area at 13.4 percent (or 151,174 people). The Wilmington metropolitan area (adjacent to Brunswick County) and the Charlotte metropolitan areas were tied for the third fastest growth during this period (at 11.1 percent growth). Wilmington (consisting of New Hanover and Pender counties) added 28,184 people while the North Carolina counties of the Charlotte‐Concord‐Gastonia MSA added 208,898 people between 2010 and 2016. Among all metropolitan statistical areas, only Rocky Mount saw population decline during this period. Table 3. Population Change in Metropolitan Areas by Percentage Change, April 1, 2010 – July 1, 2016 Total Population Change Rank Metropolitan Statistical Area April 1, 2010 July 1, 2016 Numeric Percent 1 Myrtle Beach‐Conway‐North Myrtle Beach (NC) 107,431 127,750 20,319 18.9 2 Raleigh 1,130,479 1,281,653 151,174 13.4 3 Charlotte‐Concord‐Gastonia (NC) 1,881,108 2,090,006 208,898 11.1 3 Wilmington 254,883 283,067 28,184 11.1 5 Durham‐Chapel Hill 506,646 555,387 48,741 9.6 6 Jacksonville 177,787 193,914 16,127 9.1 7 Asheville 424,853 456,541 31,688 7.5 8 Virginia Beach‐Newport News (NC) 35,733 37,992 2,259 6.3 9 Burlington 151,144 159,054 7,910 5.2 10 Greenville 168,152 175,885 7,733 4.6 11 Greensboro‐High Point 723,854 755,832 31,978 4.4 12 Fayetteville 366,311 382,038 15,727 4.3 13 Winston‐Salem 640,580 661,968 21,388 3.3 14 Goldsboro 122,638 124,808 2,170 1.8 15 New Bern 126,795 127,427 632 0.5 16 Hickory‐Lenoir‐Morganton 365,814 367,364 1,550 0.4 17 Rocky Mount 152,383 147,923 ‐4,460 ‐2.9 Metropolitan 7,336,591 7,928,609 592,018 8.1 Non‐Metropolitan 2,199,097 2,227,333 28,236 1.3 State 9,535,688 10,155,942 620,254 6.5 Source: North Carolina OSBM, Standard Population Estimates, Vintage 2016.
Recommended publications
  • Environmental Assessment of the Lower Cape Fear River System, 2013
    Environmental Assessment of the Lower Cape Fear River System, 2013 By Michael A. Mallin, Matthew R. McIver and James F. Merritt August 2014 CMS Report No. 14-02 Center for Marine Science University of North Carolina Wilmington Wilmington, N.C. 28409 Executive Summary Multiparameter water sampling for the Lower Cape Fear River Program (LCFRP) has been ongoing since June 1995. Scientists from the University of North Carolina Wilmington’s (UNCW) Aquatic Ecology Laboratory perform the sampling effort. The LCFRP currently encompasses 33 water sampling stations throughout the lower Cape Fear, Black, and Northeast Cape Fear River watersheds. The LCFRP sampling program includes physical, chemical, and biological water quality measurements and analyses of the benthic and epibenthic macroinvertebrate communities, and has in the past included assessment of the fish communities. Principal conclusions of the UNCW researchers conducting these analyses are presented below, with emphasis on water quality of the period January - December 2013. The opinions expressed are those of UNCW scientists and do not necessarily reflect viewpoints of individual contributors to the Lower Cape Fear River Program. The mainstem lower Cape Fear River is a 6th order stream characterized by periodically turbid water containing moderate to high levels of inorganic nutrients. It is fed by two large 5th order blackwater rivers (the Black and Northeast Cape Fear Rivers) that have low levels of turbidity, but highly colored water with less inorganic nutrient content than the mainstem. While nutrients are reasonably high in the river channels, major algal blooms have until recently been rare because light is attenuated by water color or turbidity, and flushing is usually high (Ensign et al.
    [Show full text]
  • York County, South Carolina Facts
    News for Immediate Release Contact: Sonja Burris 803-329-5200 [email protected] York County, South Carolina Facts Settled: The earliest known inhabitants of York County, SC were the Catawba Indians. The first European settlers were the Scots-Irish from Pennsylvania and Virginia. The county was officially established in 1785. County History: From 1772 until the end of the Revolutionary War the area was known as the New Acquisition and ran approximately eleven miles north-to-south and sixty- five miles from east-to-west. In 1785, York County became one of the original counties in the newly-created state. The section of South Carolina known as the “New Acquisition” was the scene of significant activity during the American Revolution. The Battles of Williamson’s Plantation (Huck’s Defeat) and Kings Mountain were both fought on York County soil. York County as a whole experienced significant growth during the antebellum years, and the increase occurred primarily among the black population. As the importance of cotton grew, so did slavery become an integral part of the economic life of the county. The antebellum period saw the establishment and growth of several rural settlement areas and communities in York County. Key to York County’s mid- nineteenth-century growth was the arrival in the eastern part of the county of the Charlotte and South Carolina Railroad, opened in 1852. Beginning in the 1880s, the textile industry became increasingly important, and by the 1950s it was the largest employer in the county. Railroads and textiles also spurred the development of Rock Hill and Fort Mill, which are now the largest cities in the county.
    [Show full text]
  • Piedmont Triad Region Equitable Growth Profile of the Piedmont Triad Region Policylink and PERE 2 Summary
    Equitable Growth Profile of the Piedmont Triad Region Equitable Growth Profile of the Piedmont Triad Region PolicyLink and PERE 2 Summary Communities of color are driving the Piedmont Triad’s population growth, and their ability to participate in the economy and thrive is central to the region’s success now and in the future. But slow growth in jobs and economic activity – along with rising inequality and wide racial gaps in income and opportunity – place the region’s economic future at risk. Equitable growth is the path to sustained economic prosperity. By growing good jobs, investing in its increasingly diverse workforce, and infusing economic inclusion into its economic development and growth strategies, the region’s leaders can put all residents on the path toward reaching their full potential and secure a bright economic future for the Piedmont Triad. Equitable Growth Profile of the Piedmont Triad Region PolicyLink and PERE 3 List of indicators DEMOGRAPHICS Median Hourly Wage by Race/Ethnicity, 2000 and 2010 Who lives in the region and how is this changing? Is the middle class expanding? Race/Ethnicity and Nativity, 2010 Households by Income Level, 1979 and 2010 Growth Rates of Major Racial/Ethnic Groups, 2000 to 2010 Is the middle class becoming more inclusive? Racial/Ethnic Composition, 1980 to 2040 Racial Composition of Middle-Class Households and All Percent People of Color by County, 1980 to 2040 Households, 1980 and 2010 Share of Population Growth Attributable to People of Color by County, FULL EMPLOYMENT 2000 to 2010 How close
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Heritage the Mountains and Foothills of North Carolina Have Over Many Centuries Fostered a Rich Mosaic of Cultural Heritage
    Western North Carolina Vitality Index Cultural Heritage www.wncvitalityindex.org The mountains and foothills of North Carolina have over many centuries fostered a rich mosaic of cultural heritage. The birthplace of the Cherokee’s advanced early civilization, the region is home today to the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians, which continues to preserve many facets of traditional Cherokee culture. Beginning in the eighteenth century, European and African settlers moved into the mountains. The relative isolation of mountain life helped these settlers refine and preserve many traditions, most notably handmade crafts, traditional music, and local agricultural practices. Today, these distinctive cultural legacies are celebrated as living traditions, providing employment to master artists and tradition bearers and drawing tourists from across the globe to experience the region’s craft galleries, music halls, festivals, museums, farms, and local cuisine. photo courtesy of Blue Ridge National this project has been funded by Heritage Area a project of Blue Ridge National Heritage Area Designation A National Heritage Area is a place designated by the United States Congress where natural, cultural, historic, and recreational resources combine to form a cohesive, nationally distinctive landscape arising from patterns of human activity shaped by geography. Currently, there are 49 National Heritage Areas across the United States, where each area shares how their people, resources, and histories come together to provide experiences that “tell America’s story” and to encourage the community to join together around a common theme and promote the cultural, natural, and recreational benefits of the area. In November 2003, Western North Carolina (WNC) was designated the Blue Ridge National Heritage Area in recognition of the region’s agriculture, craft heritage, traditional music, the distinctive living traditions of Cherokee culture, and rich natural heritage, and their significance to the country.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Aging Population & Individuals with Disabilities
    ALAMANCE An Overview of the COUNTY Aging Population & Individuals with Disabilities Publication Date: June 2018 Alamance County Letter from the Piedmont Triad Regional Council Area Agency on Aging Director ........... iii Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Health Care.................................................................................................................................... 2 Health Outcomes ......................................................................................................................... 3 Chronic Disease .......................................................................................................................... 4 Health Care Cost ......................................................................................................................... 5 Medicare ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Health Care Facilities .................................................................................................................. 6 Long-Term Care Facilities .......................................................................................................... 8 Agencies Serving Older Adults and Individuals with Disabilities Directory ........................... 10 Demographics of the Total Population ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina 2015 Community Profile
    North Carolina 2015 Community Profile The Fabric that Binds the Piedmont Small town feel... Rooted in its textile history and fully embracing its vibrant future, Burlington is truly a diverse and dynamic city. Ask most visitors and residents of Burlington to describe the city, and they will tell you that Burlington is the perfect mix of a friendly town and growing city, making it an easy place to start a business and a desirable place to start a life. Only 25 minutes from both the Triad and Triangle regions, Burlington offers affordable, quality living with direct access to many of the nation’s finest universities, nationally ranked healthcare facilities, and internationally known employers, ranging from high-tech fields to transportation and logistics. Take a stroll downtown and you will also find the headquarters of the nation’s largest laboratory services company, Laboratory Corporation of America (Labcorp). Burlington is home to the famous Sunbrella brand fabrics manufactured by Burlington-based Glen Raven, Inc. Burlington is ready to host your life, whether for your family home or the center of corporate activity for your business. In addition to it’s ideal location, the city offers a myriad of recreational opportunities. Serve up a game of tennis at the state-of- the-art Burlington Tennis Center, try your hand at disc golf at Springwood Park, head to Fairchild Park for practice at Burlington’s BMX track, or embark on an adventure on one of Burlington’s many lakes, marinas and trails. In Burlington, there are opportunities for all ages to play from youth and adult athletics, youth programming and senior activities.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of Carolina Bays and Ditched Streams at Risk Under the Proposed WOTUS Definition
    CAPE FEAR RIVER WATERSHED: A Case Study of Carolina Bays and Ditched Streams at Risk under the Proposed WOTUS Definition The Cape Fear River. Photo by Kemp Burdette The Cape Fear River Basin is North Carolina’s largest watershed, with an area of over 9,000 square miles. Major tributaries include the Deep River, the Haw River, the Northeast Cape Fear River, the Black River, and the South River. These rivers converge to form a thirty-mile-long estuary before flowing into the Atlantic Ocean at Cape Fear.1 The Cape Fear supplies water to some of the fastest ​ growing counties in the United States;2 roughly one in five North Carolinians gets their drinking ​ water from the Cape Fear, including residents of Greensboro, Fayetteville, and Wilmington.3 ​ The Cape Fear Basin is a popular watershed for a variety of recreation activities. State parks along the river include Haw River State Park, Raven Rock State Park, and Carolina Beach State Park. The faster-flowing water of the upper basin is popular with paddlers, as are the slow meandering blackwater rivers and streams of the lower Cape Fear and estuary. Fishing is very popular; the Cape Fear supports a number of freshwater species, saltwater species, and even anadromous (migratory) species like the endangered sturgeon, striped bass, and shad. Cape Fear River Watershed: Case Study Page 2 of 8 The Cape Fear is North Carolina’s most ecologically diverse watershed; the Lower Cape Fear is notable because it is part of a biodiversity “hotspot,” recording the largest degree of biodiversity on the eastern seaboard of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Employment Assistance and Job Training Housing And/Or
    JOBSTART COUNTY RESOURCE LIST HAYWOOD COUNTY Resources to Support Your Employment and Life Plans NORTH CAROLINA CARE-LINE 1-800-662-7030 This is a number that you can call to find out about community resources all over North Carolina. Employment Assistance and Job Training Mountain Projects This program helps people with Comments/Appointments Phone: 704-452-1447 low incomes that want to get a job. Haywood County JobLink Center/ Employment Security Commission 1170 N. Main Street Waynesville, NC 28786 Phone: 828-456-6061 Vocational Rehabilitation Office Sylva Unit Office 485-D East Main Street Sylva, NC 28779 Phone: 828-586-4032 Haywood Community College 185 Freedlander Drive Clyde, NC 28721 Phone: 828-627-2821 Housing and/or Emergency Shelter REACH of Haywood County This service helps people who PO Box 206 have been victims of sexual Waynesville, NC 28786 assault or domestic violence. Phone: 704-456-7898 CROSSROADS Offers emergency shelter and food PO Box 126 assistance Waynesville, NC 28786 Community Action Offers emergency shelter and food Route 1, Box 732 assistance Waynesville, NC 28786 Phone: 704-452-1447 Salvation Army Offers emergency shelter and food PO Box 358 assistance Waynesville, NC 28786 Phone: 704-456-7111 or 704-452-9054 Transportation, Food and Clothing Note: For Driver License Information, See Important Documents Section. REACH of Haywood County This service helps people who PO Box 206 have been victims of sexual Waynesville, NC 28786 assault or domestic violence. Phone: 704-456-7898 www.haywoodnc.org/government/haywoodcountygovt.html Page 1 JOBSTART COUNTY RESOURCE LIST HAYWOOD COUNTY Resources to Support Your Employment and Life Plans NORTH CAROLINA CARE-LINE 1-800-662-7030 This is a number that you can call to find out about community resources all over North Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Piedmont in the Savage and Relay Quadrangles, Howard, Baltimore, and Anne Arundel Counties, Maryland
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Geologic Map of the Piedmont in the Savage and Relay Quadrangles, Howard, Baltimore, and Anne Arundel Counties, Maryland By Avery Ala Drake, Jr.1 Open-File Report 98-757 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 'Reston, VA 1998 GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE PIEDMONT IN THE SAVAGE AND RELAY QUADRANGLES, HOWARD, BALTIMORE, AND ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTIES, MARYLAND by Avery Ala Drake, Jr. INTRODUCTION The Piedmont in the Savage and Relay quadrangles (fig. 1) is largely in Howard County, Maryland. The northeasternmost part is in Baltimore County, Maryland and about 0.03 square miles is in Anne Arundel County. Most of the area is suburban and almost all outcrops are restricted to the Patapsco, Middle Patuxent, Little Patuxent, and other stream valleys. Crystalline rocks of the central Appalachian Piedmont within these quadrangles are overlain in many places by Coastal Plain deposits of Cretaceous age. Alluvium occurs along most streams. The geology of adjacent quadrangles on the west and south has been mapped by Drake (in press, unpublished data, 1991-1997) and J.N. Roen and A.A. Drake, Jr. (in press), and that to the north and east by Crowley (1976). The tectonics of the area were interpreted by Crowley (1976) and Drake (1995). Aeromagnetic and gravity surveys of the area were interpreted by Bromery (1968).
    [Show full text]
  • Quartz Crystal Deposits of Southwestern Virginia and Western North Carolina
    Quartz Crystal Deposits of Southwestern Virginia and Western North Carolina GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1072-D Quartz Crystal Deposits of Southwestern Virginia and Western North Carolina By JOHN B. MERTIE, JR. CONTRIBUTIONS TO ECONOMIC GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1072-D A detailed report on quart* crystals from 37 sources and an explanation of their origins UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1959 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U. S. Geological Survey Library has cataloged this publication as follows: Mertie, John Beaver, 1888- Quartz crystal deposits of southwestern Virginia and western North Carolina. Washington, U. S. Govt. Print. Off., 1958. iv, 233-298 p. maps, tables. 25 cm. (U. S. Geological Survey. Bulletin 1072-D. Contributions to economic geology) "A detailed report on quartz crystals from 37 sources and an ex­ planation of their origins." Bibliography: p. 295-296. 1. Quartz. i. Title. (Series: U. S. Geological Survey. Bul­ letin 1072-D. Series: U. S. Geological Survey. Contributions to economic geology) 553.8 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price 30 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS PagC Abstract.._._----.---._______-_______._--__. ...__. ________ 233 Introduction.___-_-__---___--__--_--__--_-------_-_-__---.-_---___ 234 Present investigation_____________________________________________ 235 Sites of deposits.____--_-_____-__--___-___-_____________-_-________
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Resiliency Tool Kit
    AUGUST 2018 PIEDMONT TRIAD CLIMATE RESILIENCY TOOL KIT PIEDMONT TRIAD CLIMATE RESILIENCY TOOL KIT PREPARED BY PROJECT TEAM Kelly Larkins, Regional Planner II Cameron Colvin, Water Resources Planner Anna Leonard, Environmental Programs Coordinator Lindsey Bijas, Environmental Programs Coordinator Lauren Huffstetler, AmeriCorps Service Member Kayla Kohlmann, AmeriCorps Service Member FOREWORD The Piedmont Triad Regional Council works closely with member governments to identify and address local and regional concerns. We recognize that there is a growing need for regional guidance on climate issues. Local decision makers need access to up-to-date and reliable information about current and projected changes in climate, the impacts of such changes, and strategies that communities can undertake to better prepare and adapt to a changing climate, so that they can make well-informed decisions and investments. The Piedmont Triad Climate Resiliency Tool Kit is intended to serve as a resource for the region’s member communities and provide the background knowledge necessary to begin working towards a more resilient future. It summarizes existing climate data, discusses the likely local and regional impacts, and provides resources and recommendations to assist local communities in addressing these challenges. This project builds off of the Piedmont Together Climate Adaptability Report, which was developed in 2014 as part of a Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Sustainable Communities initiative. We hope that this report will raise awareness and understanding
    [Show full text]
  • Water Supply & Wastewater
    Piedmont Triad Climate Resiliency Tool Kit Water Supply & Wastewater Introduction Water is a scarce natural resource in the Piedmont region. As the Piedmont Triad continues to grow and develop, and the demand for potable water increases, it has become increasingly important to monitor the surface water capacity available to fulfill our regional water demand. Short-term solutions to water issues are generally quick and necessary steps in reaction to immediate concerns. However, a long-term planning approach will better prepare local governments for the unique challenges facing our region. Investment in a deeper understanding of the complex and challenging political, regulatory, and environmental issues surrounding water supply will help guide decision-makers to consider future ramifications of options in resource planning. This assessment of current and future (20-50 years) water resource needs and wastewater treatment plant capacity includes the 12-county Piedmont Triad Regional Council (PTRC) Region (Alamance, Caswell, Davidson, Davie, Forsyth, Guilford, Montgomery, Randolph, Rockingham, Stokes, Surry, and Yadkin Counties). Water supply and wastewater capacity are assessed within the context of surface water availability, projected population growth, geography, current laws and regulations, water quality, and patterns of water use (water conservation and water reuse). Background Drinking water comes from two primary sources, surface water or groundwater. Surface water is the water found above ground in the form of rainwater runoff, streams, rivers, lakes and reservoirs. Groundwater is unseen and deep in the ground saturating porous sandy soils or fractures of bedrock. Surface water and groundwater affect each other. Groundwater comes to the surface (springs) and can help replenish surface water.
    [Show full text]