DOCSLIB.ORG

Census Bureau Population Estimates for North Carolina Metropolitan and Micropolitan Areas and Counties

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Census Bureau Population Estimates for North Carolina Metropolitan and Micropolitan Areas and Counties Census Bureau Population Estimates for North Carolina Metropolitan and Micropolitan Areas and Counties North Carolina had the 4th largest numeric change between April 1, 2010 and July 1, 2018, and many of the state’s metropolitan and micropolitan areas are the largest and fastest growing in the nation, according to the latest population estimates released by the U.S. Census Bureau on April 18, 2019. The majority (57%) of North Carolina’s 100 counties grew during this same period – with the largest numeric and percentage growth occurring in metropolitan counties in the state – particularly those in the Piedmont and along the coast (Figure 1). Between 2017 and 2018, 71 of North Carolina’s 100 counties grew. This compares to 55 percent of all counties nationwide. Brunswick County was the 9th fastest growing county in the nation (4th among counties with populations of 20,000 or more). Population increases in the state and for most counties during this decade has remained slower than the change that occurred between 2000 and 2010 (on an annualized basis). Only in four counties is the rate of growth faster than what was experienced in the previous decade: Durham, Gaston, and Yancey Counties. These counties have added more people in the 8 1/4 years since the last Census as they did in the previous decade. This report summarizes the Census Bureau’s latest population estimates. The State of North Carolina and many counties, municipalities and other organizations are now working to ensure a complete count of the total population in North Carolina on April 1, 2020 – the count date for the next decennial census. More information about these efforts can be found at: https://census.nc.gov/. Figure 1. The North Carolina Office of State Budget and Management is a member of the Federal- State Cooperative for Population Estimates (FSCPE) and is the Lead Agency for the North Carolina State Data Center (SDC). Population Change in Metropolitan/Micropolitan Areas1 North Carolina is home to some of the largest and fastest growing metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas in the nation. At 2.6 million, the Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia (NC-SC) Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) was the 23rd largest in the United States in 2018 (ranked 24th in 2010). At 1.4 million, the Raleigh MSA ranked 42nd (ranked 48th in 2010) and the Greensboro-High Point MSA was ranked 75th (at 768,000) nationally. North Carolina counties are included in the Virginia Beach-Norfolk- Newport News, VA-NC MSA which ranked 37th nationally in 2018 (it ranked 36th in 2010). Brunswick County is part of the Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC-NC Metro Area which was the 2nd fastest growing (3.8%) metropolitan area in the United States between 2017 and 2018 and since the last decennial census (at 27.7% percentage increase). The Raleigh MSA was the 10th fastest growing MSA in the nation between 2010 and 2018 (at 20.5%) and the 22nd fastest growing between 2017 and 2018 (at 2.1%). The Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia (NC-SC) MSA had the 31st fastest growth at 15.9%. The Dunn Micropolitan Statistical Area (Harnett County) is the 10th most populated micropolitan area in the nation. The population increased from 132,229 in 2017 to 134,214 in 2018, an increase of 1,985 people (4th largest numeric growth among all Micropolitan Statistical Areas). The Pinehurst-Southern Pines Micropolitan Statistical Area (Moore County) had the 12th largest numeric change between 2017 and 2018 (1,450 people). There were an estimated 98,682 people in the Pinehurst-Southern Pines Micropolitan Statistical Area in 2018. Figure 2. 1 Statistical areas are defined by the Federal Office of Management and Budget. Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) are comprised of counties containing a central city of 50,000 or more in population and surrounding counties with a high level of commuting with the central city. Micropolitan Statistical Areas are organized around central towns of 10,000 but less than 50,000 in population. Both MSAs and Micropolitan Statistical Areas may contain multiple counties and may cross state lines. 2 | Page Percent Population Change Population growth continues to be concentrated in and around major metropolitan areas of the state – and particularly in the piedmont and coastal areas. Thirty-five counties had rates of growth that were equal to or faster than the state’s growth rate of 1.1% between 2017 and 2018 (Figure 2). The fastest population growth between 2017 and 2018 occurred in Brunswick (4.6%), Johnston (3.2%), Currituck (2.8%), Chatham (2.7%), Franklin (2.3%), Pender (2.3%), and Cabarrus (2.2%) Counties. Between 2010 and 2018, Brunswick County was the fastest growing county in North Carolina, increasing in population size by 27.3 percent (or 29,315 people – Table 1). This is followed by Wake (21.2 percent), Johnston (20.0 percent), Pender (19.1 percent), and Mecklenburg (18.9 percent) Counties. Twenty-two counties grew faster than the state between 2010 and 2018 (more than an 8.9 percent increase). Table 1. Population and Population Change for the Twenty Counties in North Carolina with the Largest Percentage Increase from April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2018 Change Change Population 2000 - 2010 2010 - 2018* County 2000 2010 2018 Numeric Percent Numeric Percent Brunswick 73,121 107,429 136,744 34,308 46.9 29,315 27.3 Wake 627,906 901,058 1,092,305 273,152 43.5 191,247 21.2 Johnston 121,998 168,877 202,675 46,879 38.4 33,798 20.0 Pender 41,071 52,198 62,162 11,127 27.1 9,964 19.1 Mecklenburg 695,348 919,668 1,093,901 224,320 32.3 174,233 18.9 Cabarrus 131,043 178,087 211,342 47,044 35.9 33,255 18.7 Durham 223,270 269,999 316,739 46,729 20.9 46,740 17.3 Union 123,834 201,334 235,908 77,500 62.6 34,574 17.2 Harnett 90,978 114,681 134,214 23,703 26.1 19,533 17.0 Hoke 33,708 46,890 54,764 13,182 39.1 7,874 16.8 Chatham 49,396 63,481 73,139 14,085 28.5 9,658 15.2 Currituck 18,179 23,547 27,072 5,368 29.5 3,525 15.0 New Hanover 160,315 202,683 232,274 42,368 26.4 29,591 14.6 Iredell 122,631 159,451 178,435 36,820 30.0 18,984 11.9 Moore 74,772 88,242 98,682 13,470 18.0 10,440 11.8 Franklin 47,284 60,553 67,560 13,269 28.1 7,007 11.6 Onslow 150,418 177,799 197,683 27,381 18.2 19,884 11.2 Alamance 130,750 151,160 166,436 20,410 15.6 15,276 10.1 Watauga 42,684 51,057 55,945 8,373 19.6 4,888 9.6 Henderson 89,184 106,713 116,748 17,529 19.7 10,035 9.4 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates, Vintage 2018 and 2000-2010 Intercensal Estimates. 2000 and 2010 Estimates Base. *99 months change from April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2018. Numeric Population Change The two largest counties in North Carolina (Mecklenburg and Wake Counties) accounted for 43 percent of the state’s total population growth between 2010 and 2018 of 847,884 people (Table 2). Between 2010 and 2018, the population in Wake County increased by 191,247 people – roughly equivalent to the entire population of Onslow County. Wake County’s growth was the 19th largest numeric growth nationally during this period. Half of this increase was attributed to net domestic migration (more people moving into the county from other states and counties than moving out). Wake County was ranked 10th in the nation in the number of net domestic migrants (at 97,063 net migrants). Mecklenburg County added a population equivalent to the size of Iredell County during this same period – adding 174,233 (ranked 21st in numeric growth nationally). 3 | Page According to these estimates, 21 counties added at least 10,000 people from April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2018. Four counties added between 20,000 and 30,000 people, including: Buncombe (20,772), Forsyth (28,450), Brunswick (29,315), and New Hanover (29,591). Five counties added between 30,000 and 50,000 people, including: Cabarrus (33,255), Johnston (33,798), Union (34,574), Guilford (45,249), and Durham (46,740). Between July 1, 2017 and July 1, 2018, 71 counties gained population, with the largest population growth occurring in: Wake (20,419), Mecklenburg (16,590), Johnston (6,252), and Brunswick (6,009) Counties. Avery County population did not change, while 28 counties lost population. Robeson County (-759), Edgecombe (-752), and Halifax (-708) Counties had the largest population losses during this period. Forty-three counties lost population between April 1, 2010 (Census Day) and July 1, 2018, significantly more than the 6 counties that lost population between 2000 and 2010. Many of these counties are rural – with several located in the northeast portion of the state. According to these estimates, Edgecombe (-4,451) and Halifax (-4,053) Counties had the largest population decreases from 2010-2018. Table 2. Population and Population Change for the Twenty Counties in North Carolina with the Largest Numeric Increase from April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2018 Change Change Population 2000 - 2010 2010 - 2018* County 2000 2010 2018 Numeric Percent Numeric Percent Wake 627,906 901,058 1,092,305 273,152 43.5 191,247 21.2 Mecklenburg 695,348 919,668 1,093,901 224,320 32.3 174,233 18.9 Durham 223,270 269,999 316,739 46,729 20.9 46,740 17.3 Guilford 420,848 488,421 533,670 67,573 16.1 45,249 9.3 Union 123,834 201,334 235,908 77,500 62.6 34,574 17.2 Johnston 121,998 168,877 202,675 46,879 38.4 33,798 20.0 Cabarrus 131,043 178,087 211,342 47,044 35.9 33,255 18.7 New Hanover 160,315 202,683 232,274 42,368 26.4 29,591 14.6 Brunswick 73,121 107,429 136,744 34,308 46.9 29,315 27.3 Forsyth 306,274 350,649 379,099 44,375 14.5 28,450 8.1 Buncombe 206,365 238,331 259,103 31,966 15.5 20,772 8.7 Onslow 150,418 177,799 197,683 27,381 18.2 19,884 11.2 Harnett 90,978 114,681 134,214 23,703 26.1 19,533 17.0 Iredell 122,631 159,451 178,435 36,820 30.0 18,984 11.9 Gaston 190,445 206,094 222,846 15,649 8.2 16,752 8.1 Alamance 130,750 151,160 166,436 20,410 15.6 15,276 10.1 Cumberland 302,978 319,433 332,330 16,455 5.4 12,897 4.0 Orange 115,589 133,702 146,027 18,113 15.7 12,325 9.2 Pitt 133,759 168,167 179,914 34,408 25.7 11,747 7.0 Moore 74,772 88,242 98,682 13,470 18.0 10,440 11.8 Source: U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • York County, South Carolina Facts
    News for Immediate Release Contact: Sonja Burris 803-329-5200 [email protected] York County, South Carolina Facts Settled: The earliest known inhabitants of York County, SC were the Catawba Indians. The first European settlers were the Scots-Irish from Pennsylvania and Virginia. The county was officially established in 1785. County History: From 1772 until the end of the Revolutionary War the area was known as the New Acquisition and ran approximately eleven miles north-to-south and sixty- five miles from east-to-west. In 1785, York County became one of the original counties in the newly-created state. The section of South Carolina known as the “New Acquisition” was the scene of significant activity during the American Revolution. The Battles of Williamson’s Plantation (Huck’s Defeat) and Kings Mountain were both fought on York County soil. York County as a whole experienced significant growth during the antebellum years, and the increase occurred primarily among the black population. As the importance of cotton grew, so did slavery become an integral part of the economic life of the county. The antebellum period saw the establishment and growth of several rural settlement areas and communities in York County. Key to York County’s mid- nineteenth-century growth was the arrival in the eastern part of the county of the Charlotte and South Carolina Railroad, opened in 1852. Beginning in the 1880s, the textile industry became increasingly important, and by the 1950s it was the largest employer in the county. Railroads and textiles also spurred the development of Rock Hill and Fort Mill, which are now the largest cities in the county.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional and County Population Change in North Carolina
    Regional and County Population Change in North Carolina A Summary of Trends from April 1, 2010 through July 1, 2016 North Carolina Office of State Budget and Management December 2017 Introduction The following document summarizes population trends for North Carolina using the certified county population estimates produced by the North Carolina Office of State Budget and Management (OSBM) released in September of 2017. These certified population estimates are as of July 1, 2016.1 Additional population tables that include statistics for all 100 counties can be obtained from https://www.osbm.nc.gov/demog/county‐estimates.2 Highlights: North Carolina grew by 620,254 people between April 1, 2010 and July 1, 2016, a 6.5% increase; Three of every four people added in this period were living in central North Carolina3; 95% of all growth occurred within metropolitan counties4; Among regional planning areas, only the Upper Coastal Plain Council of Governments experienced population decline; The fastest growing metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) since April 1, 2010 were the North Carolina portion of the Myrtle Beach‐Conway‐North Myrtle Beach MSA, the Raleigh MSA, the North Carolina portion of the Charlotte‐Concord‐Gastonia MSA, and the Wilmington MSA. Only the Rocky Mount MSA experienced population decline since the last census, losing 4,460 people (a 2.9% decline); The Charlotte‐Concord‐Gastonia MSA remains the largest metropolitan area in the state (at 2.1 million people); Mecklenburg (1.1 million) and Wake (1.0 million) Counties remain
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Piedmont in the Savage and Relay Quadrangles, Howard, Baltimore, and Anne Arundel Counties, Maryland
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Geologic Map of the Piedmont in the Savage and Relay Quadrangles, Howard, Baltimore, and Anne Arundel Counties, Maryland By Avery Ala Drake, Jr.1 Open-File Report 98-757 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 'Reston, VA 1998 GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE PIEDMONT IN THE SAVAGE AND RELAY QUADRANGLES, HOWARD, BALTIMORE, AND ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTIES, MARYLAND by Avery Ala Drake, Jr. INTRODUCTION The Piedmont in the Savage and Relay quadrangles (fig. 1) is largely in Howard County, Maryland. The northeasternmost part is in Baltimore County, Maryland and about 0.03 square miles is in Anne Arundel County. Most of the area is suburban and almost all outcrops are restricted to the Patapsco, Middle Patuxent, Little Patuxent, and other stream valleys. Crystalline rocks of the central Appalachian Piedmont within these quadrangles are overlain in many places by Coastal Plain deposits of Cretaceous age. Alluvium occurs along most streams. The geology of adjacent quadrangles on the west and south has been mapped by Drake (in press, unpublished data, 1991-1997) and J.N. Roen and A.A. Drake, Jr. (in press), and that to the north and east by Crowley (1976). The tectonics of the area were interpreted by Crowley (1976) and Drake (1995). Aeromagnetic and gravity surveys of the area were interpreted by Bromery (1968).
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina Landform Regions (And Facts About Landforms) Earth Where Is South Carolina? North America United States of America SC
    SCSouth Carolina Landform Regions (and facts about Landforms) Earth Where is South Carolina? North America United States of America SC Here we are! South Carolina borders the Atlantic Ocean. SC South Carolina Landform Regions Map Our state is divided into regions, starting at the mountains and going down to the coast. Can you name these? Blue Ridge Mountains Landform Regions SC The Blue Ridge Mountain Region is only 2% of the South Carolina land mass. Facts About the Blue Ridge Mountains . ◼ It is the smallest of the landform regions ◼ It includes the state’s highest point: Sassafras Mountain. ◼ The Blue Ridge Mountains are part of the Appalachian Mountain Range Facts About the Blue Ridge Mountains . ◼ The Blue Ridge Region is mountainous and has many hardwood forests, streams, and waterfalls. ◼ Many rivers flow out of the Blue Ridge. Blue Ridge Mountains, SC Greenville Spartanburg Union Greenwood Rock Hill Abbeville Piedmont Landform Regions SC If you could see the Piedmont Region from space and without the foliage, you would notice it is sort of a huge plateau. Facts About the Piedmont Region . ◼ The Piedmont is the largest region of South Carolina. ◼ The Piedmont is often called The Upstate. Facts About the Piedmont Region . ◼ It is the foothills of the mountains and includes rolling hills and many valleys. ◼ Piedmont means “foot of the mountains” ◼ Waterfalls and swift flowing rivers provided the water power for early mills and the textile industry. Facts About the Piedmont Region . ◼ The monadnocks are located in the Piedmont. ◼ Monadnocks – an isolated or single hill made of very hard rock.
    [Show full text]
  • SP20 Delaware Piedmont Geology
    Delaware Piedmont Geology including a guide to the rocks of Red Clay Valley RESEARCH DELAWARE SERVICEGEOLOGICAL SURVEY EXPLORATION Delaware Geological Survey University of Delaware Special Publication No. 20 By Margaret O. Plank and William S. Schenck 106/1500/298/C Delaware Piedmont Geology Including a guide to the rocks of Red Clay Valley Delaware Geological Survey University of Delaware Special Publication No. 20 Margaret O. Plank and William S. Schenck 1998 Contents FOREWORD . v INTRODUCTION . vii Acknowledgments . viii BASIC FACTS ABOUT ROCKS . 1–13 Our Earth . 1 Crust . 1 Mantle . 2 Core. 2 Plate Tectonics . 3 Minerals . 5 Rocks . 6 Igneous Rocks . 6 Sedimentary Rocks. 8 Metamorphic Rocks . 9 Deformation. 11 Time . 12 READING THE ROCKS: A HISTORY OF THE DELAWARE PIEDMONT . 15–29 Geologic Setting . 15 Piedmont . 15 Fall Line. 17 Atlantic Coastal Plain. 17 Rock Units of the Delaware Piedmont . 20 Wilmington Complex . 20 Wissahickon Formation . 21 Setters Formation & Cockeysville Marble . 22 Geologic Map for Reference . 23 Baltimore Gneiss . 24 Deformation in the Delaware Piedmont . 24 The Piedmont and Plate Tectonics . 27 Red Clay Valley: Table of Contents iii A GUIDE TO THE ROCKS ALONG THE TRACK . 31–54 Before We Begin . 31 Geologic Points of Interest . 31 A Southeast of Greenbank . 35 B Workhouse Quarry at Greenbank. 36 C Red Clay Creek and Brandywine Springs Park . 36 D Brandywine Springs to Faulkland Road . 38 E Hercules Golf Course . 39 F Rock Cut at Wooddale . 40 G Wissahickon Formation at Wooddale. 43 H Quarries at Wooddale. 43 I Red Clay Creek Flood Plain . 44 J Mount Cuba . 44 K Mount Cuba Picnic Grove .
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Piedmont Forests
    Spring 2009 Guide to Delaware Vegetation Communities Robert Coxe Guide to Delaware Vegetation Communities-Spring 2009 Acknowledgments I would like to acknowledge the contributions and help from the following people for this edition of the Guide to Delaware Vegetation Communities. Karen Bennett, Greg Moore and Janet Dennis of the Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife Bill McAvoy of the Delaware Natural Heritage Program Dr. John Kartesz of the Biota of North America Program Dr. Keith Clancy and Pete Bowman, Ecologists, formerly of the Delaware Natural Heritage Program Ery Largay and Leslie Sneddon of Natureserve All people unmentioned who made countless contributions to this document. -Take me to the vegetation community keys- Guide to Delaware Vegetation Communities-Spring 2009 Introduction The Guide to Delaware Vegetation Communities is intended to provide a Delaware flavor to the National Vegetation Classification System (NVCS). All common names of communities, except for those not in the NVCS, follow the NVCS. This document is designed for the web and CD only, but desired sections can be printed by users. In this matter, paper and therefore trees can be preserved and impacts to the communities discussed within can be minimized. In spirit of saving these communities please only print those community descriptions that you will use or print none at all. The State of Delaware covers 1,524,863.4 acres of which 1,231,393.6 acres are terrestrial and 293,469.8 acres are water (Table 1). Currently 130 vegetation communities are known to occur in Delaware. Some of the largest vegetation communities/land covers in the state include: Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Climatological Analyses of Thunderstorms and Flash Floods in the Baltimore Metropolitan Region
    88 JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY VOLUME 8 Climatological Analyses of Thunderstorms and Flash Floods in the Baltimore Metropolitan Region ALEXANDROS A. NTELEKOS AND JAMES A. SMITH Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey WITOLD F. KRAJEWSKI IIHR-Hydroscience and Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa (Manuscript received 9 February 2006, in final form 22 June 2006) ABSTRACT The climatology of thunderstorms and flash floods in the Baltimore, Maryland, metropolitan region is examined through analyses of cloud-to-ground (CG) lightning observations from the National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN) and discharge observations from 11 U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) stream gauging stations. A point process framework is used for analyses of CG lightning strikes and the occurrences of flash floods. Analyses of lightning strikes as a space–time point process focus on the mean intensity function, from which the seasonal, diurnal, and spatial variation in mean lightning frequency are examined. Important elements of the spatial variation of mean lightning frequency are 1) initiation of thunderstorms along the Blue Ridge, 2) large variability of lightning frequency around the urban cores of Baltimore and Washington D.C., and 3) decreased lightning frequency over the Chesapeake Bay and Atlantic Ocean. Lightning frequency has a sharp seasonal maximum around mid-July, and the diurnal cycle of lightning frequency peaks between 2100 and 2200 UTC with a frequency that is more than an order of magnitude larger than the minimum frequency at 1200 UTC. The seasonal and diurnal variation of flash flood occur- rence in urban streams of Baltimore mimics the seasonal and diurnal variation of lightning.
    [Show full text]
  • Richmond County Comprehensive Plan
    AUGUSTA – RICHMOND COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN As Adopted by the Augusta-Richmond County Planning Commission Willie Wright, Chairman David M. Darby, Chairman, Comprehensive Plan Committee George A. Patty, Executive Director December 1, 2003 As Adopted by the Augusta Commission Bob Young, Mayor Willie Mays, III, Mayor Pro Tempore February 17, 2004 THE AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Table of Contents INTRODUCTION-----------------------------------------------------------------------------CHAPTER 1 Preface ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1-1 Public Participation ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1-1 The Planning Process ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1-2 Step 1: Inventory and Assessment--------------------------------------------------------------1-2 Step 2: Statement of Needs & Goals ----------------------------------------------------------.1-2 Step 3: Implementation Strategy ---------------------------------------------------------------1-2 Plan Elements ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1-3 Population ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1-3 Housing ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1-3 Economic Development --------------------------------------------------------------------------1-3
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Regions of Virginia Bordering States Major Rivers & Cities Bordering
    5 Regions of Virginia Bordering States West to East All Virginia Bears Play Tag Appalachian Plateau Valley & Ridge Never Taste Ketchup Without Mustard Blue Ridge Piedmont North Carolina Tidewater/Coastal Plain Tennessee Kentucky West Virginia Maryland Major Rivers & Cities Bordering Bodies of Water North to South Alex likes Potatoes Alexandria (and DC) are on the Potomac River. Fred likes to Rap Fredericksburg is on the Rappahannock River Chesapeake Bay Yorktown is on the York River Separates mainland Atlantic King James was Rich. VA and Eastern Shore Ocean Jamestown & Richmond are on the James River. Eastern Shore Rivers Eastern Shore Peninsula Flow into the Chesapeake Bay Source of food Pathway for exploration and settlement Chesapeake Bay Provided a safe harbor Was a source of food and transportation Atlantic Ocean Provided transportation Peninsula: links between Virginia and other places (Europe, Piece of land bordered by Africa, Caribbean) water on 3 sides Fall Line Tidewater - Coastal Plain Region Low, flat land; East of the Fall Land; Includes Eastern Shore; Natural Border between Waterfalls prevent near Atlantic Ocean and Chesapeake Bay Piedmont & Tidewater further travel on Regions the rivers. Piedmont Region Relative Location The mouse is next to the box. The ball is near the box. West of the Fall Line Means "Land at the Foot of the Mountain" Blue Ridge Mountain Region Valley and Ridge Region Old, Rounded Mountains West of Blue Ridge Region Source of Many Rivers Includes the Great Valley of Virginia Piedmont to East/Valley & Ridge to West Valleys separated by ridges Part of Appalachian Mountain System Part of Appalachian Mountain System Appalachian Plateau Region Plateau Area of elevated land that is flat on top Located in Southwest Virginia Only Small Part of Plateau Located in Virginia Dismal Swamp and Valley, Ridge Definition Lake Drummond Ridge: chain of hills Located in Tidewater/Coastal Plain Region Dismal Swamp: Surveyed by George Washington; lots of wildlife Lake Drummond: Shallow lake surrounded by Valley: land between hills swamp .
    [Show full text]
  • Philadelphia, PA Community Summary Fact Sheet
    Philadelphia, PA and surrounding area Towns and cities rely on clean air, clean water, green space, and other natural amenities for economic sustainability and quality of life, yet their benefits are not always fully understood or considered in local decisions. EPA and its partners are producing EnviroAtlas to help communities better use environmental assets for public good. EnviroAtlas includes an online interactive mapping application that anyone can use. The interactive map contains over 300 maps available for the U.S., as well as 100+ fine-scale maps for selected U.S. communities about existing and potential benefits from the local natural environment. The EnviroAtlas community component is based on 1-meter resolution land cover data. Information derived from these data is summarized by census block groups; more spatially explicit map layers are also provided. This fact sheet highlights some of the many community data layers available for the featured area of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Background The EnviroAtlas boundary for the Philadelphia area was The area was historically vegetated with hardwood forests; determined using the 2010 Census definition of an Urban however, much of the natural vegetation has been removed Area. In addition to Philadelphia, it includes Wilmington, for urbanization and cultivation. The leading industry DE and Camden, NJ as well as other towns within 14 PA, sectors in the area are financial services and health care. NJ, DE, and MD counties. The area measures 6,544 square Comcast and the University of Pennsylvania are the city’s kilometers and encompasses 3,974 census block groups. largest employers. The demographics of the Philadelphia The Philadelphia area falls along the boundary between the community area indicate that the potential exists for income Atlantic Coastal Plain and Piedmont ecoregions.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Species of Maryland's Piedmont That Are Regionally Rare but Not State Rare Cris Fleming - January 2010
    PLANT SPECIES OF MARYLAND'S PIEDMONT THAT ARE REGIONALLY RARE BUT NOT STATE RARE CRIS FLEMING - JANUARY 2010 This is a list of plant species not on Maryland's list of Rare, Threatened & Endangered Species but considered by me to be regionally rare or uncommon in Maryland's Piedmont Region (Montgomery, Carroll, Howard, Baltimore, & Harford Co) and the inner Coastal Plain areas near Washington (Prince Georges, Charles, & Anne Arundel Co). Although other botanists have been consulted, this list is mostly based on my own field experience and is not considered complete or authoritative. With a few exceptions, all plant species listed here have been seen by me in one or more of these counties. This list is for the use of members of MNPS doing field surveys in the Piedmont Region. It was prepared as one of the goals of the botany committee for the year 2002 and was completed in January 2003 and revised in February 2007 and again in January 2010. Nomenclature follows Gleason and Cronquist, Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada, Second Edition, 1991. The great majority of plants listed here as regionally rare are northern species that do grow in Maryland in the mountain counties because the climate is cooler there. The long, warm summers of the Piedmont counties preclude the widespread occurrence of many northern species. However, species of these cooler regions sometimes do occur in the Piedmont region on north-facing slopes, in shady ravines, or in especially rich, moist soil. Other species are regionally rare because their habitat is regionally rare, for instance shale barrens, serpentine barrens, diabase openings, and cool seepage swamps.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate of Pennsylvania
    Climate of Pennsylvania Introduction This publication consists of a narrative that describes some of the principal climatic features and a number of climatological summaries for stations in various geographic regions of the State. The detailed information presented should be sufficient for general use; however, some users may require additional information. The National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) located in Asheville, North Carolina is authorized to perform special services for other government agencies and for private clients at the expense of the requester. The amount charged in all cases is intended to solely defray the expenses incurred by the government in satisfying such specific requests to the best of its ability. It is essential that requesters furnish the NCDC with a precise statement describing the problem so that a mutual understanding of the specifications is reached. Unpublished climatological summaries have been prepared for a wide variety of users to fit specific applications. These include wind and temperature studies at airports, heating and cooling degree day information for energy studies, and many others. Tabulations produced as by-products of major products often contain information useful for unrelated special problems. The Means and Extremes of meteorological variables in the Climatography of the U.S. No.20 series are recorded by observers in the cooperative network. The Normals, Means and Extremes in the Local Climatological Data, annuals are computed from observations taken primarily at airports. The editor of this publication expresses his thanks to those State Climatologists, who, over the years, have made significant and lasting contributions toward the development of this very useful series.
    [Show full text]