The Committee Retires and Goes Off to Its Dinner

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Committee Retires and Goes Off to Its Dinner Covering Immigrants Who Stayed in „Our‟ Countries Report of the Commission on Radio and Television Policy: Central, East and Southeast Europe Chaired by Ellen Mickiewicz Erhard Busek James R. Shepley Professor of President, European Forum Alpbach Public Policy Studies Special Coordinator, Stability Pact Director, DeWitt Wallace Center for for South Eastern Europe Media and Democracy, Coordinator, Southeast European Duke University Cooperative Initiative Fellow, The Carter Center Rapporteur – Craig LaMay, Northwestern University November 16-18, 2008 Vienna, Austria European Forum Alpbach Invalidenstrasse 5/7 A-1030 Vienna Phone: 43-1-718171114 Fax: 43-1-7181701 www.alpbach.org NOTE: NEED NEW ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the following contributors for their support of this meeting: ORF, Österreichischer Rundfunk (Austrian Broadcasting Corporation) for hosting the meeting and providing professional assistance; the Institute for the Danube Region and Central Europe; and the DeWitt Wallace Center for Media and Democracy at Duke University. We would also like to thank the Austrian Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs; the City of Vienna; Agrana; and UNIQA Versicherungen AG. 2 NOTE: NEED NEW TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS . Introduction ................................................................................................................................ ? . Commission on Radio and Television Policy: Participants ....................................................... ? . ―Covering immigrants Who Stayed in ‗Our‘ Countries‖ — Report of the Meeting of the Commission on Radio and Television Policy: Central, East and Southeast Europe ................. ? . Policy Recommendations........................................................................................................... ? . About the Commission on Radio and Television Policy: Central, East and Southeast Europe ........................................................................................................................................ ? . About the European Alpbach Forum ......................................................................................... ? 3 NOTE: NEED NEW INTRO FROM DR. BUSEK INTRODUCTION DR. ERHARD BUSEK CHAIRMAN, EUROPEAN FORUM ALPBACH SPECIAL COORDINATOR, STABILITY PACT FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE COORDINATOR, SOUTHEAST EUROPEAN COOPERATIVE INITIATIVE The 2006 meeting of the Commission on Radio and TV Policy: Central, East and Southeast Europe dealt with the important question of how to cover news abroad, having in mind especially the coverage of foreign conflicts. Due to the re-escalation of the Middle East conflict, the ongoing fights in Iraq and other crises, the issue was enormously significant. The Commission discussed journalistic coverage of energy resources, a topic of great importance for all Europe and a continuous source of conflict. The European Union has recently committed itself to a 20 percent reduction in energy consumption by 2020 and to a greater diversity of energy sources that will include especially renewable energy. Thus, the European Union needs a common energy policy in order to be able to deal effectively with players such as Russia and Iran. The Commission also addressed important questions such as ―How Far Does Europe‘s Foreign Policy Extend?‖ and whether there is a ―European Public.‖ The success of the Commission‘s work is impressive. The annual meeting in Vienna has become an established platform for the free exchange of views between journalists and political scientists from the U.S., Western and Eastern Europe. I want to thank Ellen Mickiewicz and her team from Duke University for their excellent cooperation and the Austrian Broadcasting Corporation for hosting the meeting. Many thanks to the supporters of the media conference, the Austrian Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs, the City of Vienna, Agrana, and UNIQA Versicherungen AG. 4 NOTE: NEED NEW INTRO FROM DR. MICKIEWICZ INTRODUCTION DR. ELLEN MICKIEWICZ JAMES R. SHEPLEY PROFESSOR OF PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES DUKE UNIVERSITY FELLOW, THE CARTER CENTER Matters that had long been considered settled or at least noncontroversial have come back. The Commission on Radio and Television Policy, meeting in Vienna in the fall of 2006, put forward an agenda on covering conflicts of ―other peoples.‖ What are the best ways for foreign journalists to present, insofar as possible, a fair, accurate, reliable, and complete picture of the conflict? Without providing a meaningful context, the reporter shows only a superficial and ultimately incomprehensible bit of reality. For in this time of increasing globalization—a term of disparagement for some and hope for others—how much will borders mean when information leaks out through smaller and smaller technology? Information is not synonymous with news; for the journalist, a heavier responsibility, a heavier burden is the price of the profession. Journalists often find their prestige wilting at home, because in some countries it is well known that with money a news story can be planted; it can provide favorable coverage or if the payment is not forthcoming, it can ignore the newsmaker or give unfavorable coverage. In some countries participating in the Commission, there is sizable foreign ownership of media which several participants regard as unfortunate; the foreign owners are either too close to the government or too close to pandering to a constantly polled public. The International Press Institute‘s president, Johann Fritz, presented a list of precautions for foreign journalists in danger zones. They included distinguishing between facts and government or rebel propaganda and putting their stories in a real context. These, it seems to me, are hard enough to do, especially when clearly identified journalists who were once avoided by combatants are now deliberately targeted. I have raised these particular issues because the population at home relies so heavily on its foreign reporters, while the reporters have an increasingly difficult time making a conflict truly intelligible and not superficial and because they are themselves increasingly exposed to danger. Given the rapidly shrinking globe, these critically important news stories have become much more difficult to cover, and that affects both the views of policy makers and of average citizens. The technological revolution giving us ever smaller camera equipment cannot substitute for reporters‘ nearly impossible complex understanding of the story while under fire. This does not seem to be an ephemeral moment in history. It is a dilemma we must solve. I thank Erhard Busek, Gerald Roβkogler, and the European Forum Alpbach for superlative cooperation. I also wish to thank the Austrian Broadcasting Corporation for hosting the meeting. Many thanks to the supporters of the Commission on Radio and Television Policy: the Austrian Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs, the City of Vienna, Agrana, and UNIQA Versicherungen AG. 5 COMMISSION ON RADIO AND TELEVISION POLICY: CENTRAL, EAST AND SOUTHEAST EUROPE COVERING IMMIGRANTS WHO STAYED IN „OUR‟ COUNTRIES VIENNA, AUSTRIA NOVEMBER 16-18, 2008 PARTICIPANTS & OBSERVERS NOTE: NEED UPDATED PARTICIPANT LIST CO-CHAIRS Erhard Busek Chairman, European Forum Alpbach; Special Coordinator, Stability Pact for South Eastern Europe Ellen Mickiewicz James R. Shepley Professor of Public Policy Studies, Duke University; Director, DeWitt Wallace Center for Media and Democracy PARTICIPANTS Agron Bajrami Editor in Chief, Koha Ditore, Kosovo Dragan Barbutovski Spokesperson, Press and Public Affairs, Stability Pact for South Eastern Europe Boris Bergant Deputy General Director, Radio Televizija Slovenija George Chirita Executive Director, Romanian Association of Broadcasters Nuri Colakolu Vice President, Dogan Media Group, Turkey; Chairman, TV Broadcasters Association of Turkey Johann P. Fritz Director, International Press Institute, Austria Dušan Gajić Coordinator, South East Europe TV Exchanges (SEETV); Co-founder, Mreza Network Production Group, Serbia and Montenegro Miklόs Haraszti The Representative on Freedom of the Media, OSCE, Austria Ryszard Holzer Head, ―Entrepreneur‖ Section, Puls Biznesu, Poland Edmundas Juskys Member, Radio and Television Commission of Lithuania Craig LaMay Commission Rapporteur; Assistant Professor, Medill School of Journalism, Northwestern University, USA Radomir Licina Chairman of the Board and Senior Editor, DANAS, Serbia and Montenegro Petra Lidschreiber Chief Editor, RBB-Television, RBB Rundfunk, Berlin-Brandenburg, Germany Pavol Mudry Director, SITA News Agency, Slovakia Ana Mukoska Analyst, Euro-Balkan Institute, The Republic of Macedonia Daina Ostrovska Director of Programs, TV3, Latvia Petăr Pountchev President of Radio FM+ Group, National Network; Member of the Board 6 of Private Radio Association of Bulgaria Alina Radu Director, Ziarul de Garda, Moldova Tony Reid Assistant Financial Editor, The Washington Post, USA Dominique Roch Chief Correspondent, Jerusalem Bureau, Radio France International Kenneth S. Rogerson Research Director, DeWitt Wallace Center for Media and Democracy, Duke University, USA Rainer Rosenberg Head of Special Programs, City of Vienna Radio, ORF Dietrich Schwarzkopf Former Program Director, ARD; Former Vice President, ARTE, Germany Andriy Shevchenko Vice President, National TV Company of Ukraine Savik Shuster Writer and Host, ―Freedom of Speech,‖ ICTV, Ukraine Milan Šmid Professor, Department of Journalism, Charles University, Czech Republic Renaud van der Elst
Recommended publications
  • The Newsletter of March 2019 Is Here!
    28.5.2019 DRC Newsletter March 2019 Subscribe Past Issues Translate DRC Newsletter View this email in your browser March 2019 Dear subscribers to the DRC Newsletter! The newsletter of March 2019 is here! We are once again bringing information about many possibilities for cross-border cooperation and open dialogue between scientists from across Europe. We would like to highlight that the Call for Nominations for the Danubius Young Scientist Award 2019 is still open. So if you know - or you are - a promising young scientist who deals with a cross-border issue with relevance to the Danube Region, apply and/or spread the information to others. You or your colleagues can also apply for the 16th DRC Summer School on Regional Cooperation taking place in Zagreb, Croatia. Furthermore, the newsletter introduces you with other opportunities how to connect with like-minded people from different countries. Just read it! Remember, feedback and comments are always welcome! 1. Call for Nominations: Danubius Young Scientist Award 2. SAVE THE DATE: 16th DRC Summer School 3. SAVE THE DATE: DRC Annual Meeting 4. European Forum Alpbach 5. 4th International and Interdisciplinary Summer University in Budapest 6. Green. Building. Solutions. Summer University Vienna 7. Alternative Economic and Monetary Systems. Summer University Vienna 8. proESOF Call for Proposals 9. ELTE Summer University of Hungarian Language and Culture https://mailchi.mp/965c001d301b/drc-newsletter-october-1687009?e=[UNIQID] 1/17 28.5.2019 DRC Newsletter March 2019 10. USAMV Bucharest Agricultural Economics and Policy Summer Subscribe Past Issues Translate School 11. The Danube Cooperation Forum 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Harvard University
    HARVARD UNIVERSITY ROBERT AND RENÉE BELFER CENTER FOR SCIENCE AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS 2000-2001 ANNUAL REPORT 2 Robert and Renée Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs 2000-2001 Annual Report Director’s Foreword 5 Overview From the Executive Director 7 Environment and Natural Resources Program TABLE 8 OF Harvard Information Infrastructure Project 52 CONTENTS International Security Program 71 Science, Technology and Public Policy Program 109 Strengthening Democratic Institutions Project 155 WPF Program on Intrastate Conflict, Conflict Prevention, and Conflict Resolution 177 Events 188 Publications 219 Biographies 241 Robert and Renée Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs 3 2000-2001 Annual Report 4 Robert and Renée Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs 2000-2001 Annual Report Director’s Foreword —————————————♦ For the hub of the John F. Kennedy School’s research, teaching, and training in international security affairs, environmental and resource issues, conflict prevention and resolution, and science and technology policy, the first academic year of the new century has been bracing. According to our mission statement, The Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs strives to provide leadership in advancing policy-relevant knowledge about the most important challenges of international security and other critical issues where science, technology, and international affairs intersect. BCSIA’s leadership begins with the recognition of science and technology as driving forces transforming threats and opportunities in international affairs. The Center integrates insights of social scientists, technologists, and practitioners with experience in government, diplomacy, the military, and business to address critical issues. BCSIA involvement in both the Republican and Democratic campaigns. BCSIA was privileged to have senior advisors in both camps in one of the most unforgettable American elections in recent memory.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017/18 Preamble Preamble
    Annual report 2017/18 Preamble Preamble Lisa Sonnberger Franz Fischler Chairwoman of the Forum Alpbach Network President of the European Forum Alpbach Uncertainty and the revival of ‘universalisms’ seem people to actively participate at the European I‘m impressed again and again to see the hunger From working in the committees to looking to be the recurring themes of our time influenced Forum Alpbach but further aims to encourage for knowledge and the commitment brought after the hundreds of scholarship holders – the by binary thinking using conflicting terms such as young people to become active agents in their by hundreds of scholarship holders from all over representatives of the Forum Alpbach Network ‘us’ and the ‘others’. Often ‘us’ implies a benchmark societies during the year. How can we use our the world to Alpbach every year. Their fresh breathe life into the “Spirit of Alpbach” and carry it that all ‘others’ shall align themselves to and cumulative power in order to master future ideas, visions and ways of thinking shape each out into the world. This enables the many projects, elusive terms such as ‘values’ are easily dropped challenges together? Perhaps you are familiar European Forum Alpbach and make a significant initiatives and friendships born in Alpbach to take in that regard. But what are these so ubiquitously with the Marvel movies ‘Avengers’? What I want contribution to the unique atmosphere of the effect and to grow further. One such example proclaimed ‘values’? Definitions are commonly to highlight here is that behind every chapter of Forum. It’s not only us organisers who appreciate is the „My Europe - My Story“ initiative, which left in vagueness.
    [Show full text]
  • Security and Liberty in Europe: Policymaking in an Era of Value Conflicts
    Security and Liberty in Europe: Policymaking in an Era of Value Conflicts Exclusive MP Meeting at the European Forum Alpbach 2019 25 August 2019, Alpbach Copyright 2019: The German Marshall Fund of the United States Voßstr. 20, 10117 Berlin, Germany Editors: Chiara Rosselli, Ronith Schalast, Isotta Ricci Bitti, Caspar Kolster, Helena Wittrich | GMF contents about 1 executive summary 2 recommendations and observations 4 parliamentary perspectives 7 additional resources 9 about the mercator european dialogue THE NETWORK The Mercator European Dialogue is a network of 150+ This European network is a project by the German members of parliaments (MPs) from 25+ member Marshall Fund of the United States in cooperation states. The network convenes in different European with the Barcelona Centre for International Affairs, the cities and its members participate in regular, multilateral, Istituto Affari Internazionali in Rome, and the Hellenic and thematic activities. Across parties, across political Foundation for European and Foreign Policy in Athens ideologies, across borders. Our network of national and is funded by Stiftung Mercator and since 2017 also parliamentarians aims to be as diverse as Europe itself. by the King Baudouin Foundation. 1 about executive summary On the sidelines of the Political and Legal Symposia of the European Forum Alpbach 2019, 14 members of the Mercator European Dialogue gathered to discuss value conflicts in policymaking with a focus on systematic data collection and use by governments through new technologies. In its second co-operation with the European Forum Alpbach, the Mercator European Dialogue offered members of the network a scholarship to participate in the Political and Legal Symposia of the Forum.
    [Show full text]
  • This Is War. You're Part of It.__Slawsky.Pdf
    “THIS IS WAR. YOU’RE PART OF IT.” The conflict between mainstream and alternative media before, during, and after Ukraine’s Euromaidan _______________________ Renee Bernadette Slawsky Master’s Candidate for Eurasian, Russian, and East European Studies Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service Georgetown University May 6, 2016 Table of Contents I. Introduction………………………………………………………………2 II. Theory: The mediatization of war………………………………………..3 a. Three phases of mediatization………………………………………...5 b. Third axis: Greater uncertainty in decision-making………..………...8 c. Summary……………………………………………………………...9 III. The media in Ukraine: Before Euromaidan…………………………….10 a. Initial changes in the 1990s………………………………………….10 b. The Orange Revolution……………………………………………...13 c. Mainstream media before Euromaidan……………………………...16 d. Summary.………………………………………………….……..… 22 IV. The media in Ukraine: Euromaidan and the rise of alternative media.…23 a. Role of social media…………………………………………………23 b. Mainstream media during Euromaidan……………………………...25 c. Rise of alternative media…………………………………………….27 V. The media in Ukraine: After Euromaidan, war with Russia……………30 a. Mainstream media on the war in eastern Ukraine……….…………..31 b. More alternative media focused on war in eastern Ukraine….……...34 c. Outside influences and computer-assisted reporting……………..…36 VI. The Ukrainian government and its information………………………...39 VII. Analysis and discussion………………………………………………...43 VIII. For further research……...………………………………………….…..46 IX. Conclusion…………………………………………………………...…48 I. Introduction Slawsky 1 “This is war. You’re part of it.” - Appeal of Ukrainian civil society organization to a group of international journalists Albeit unintentionally, this appeal in February 2014 by a Ukrainian civil society organization to a gathered group of journalists from around the world sums up the interaction between Ukraine’s recent crises and the media. News media no longer stands separate from conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpbach Ungarn 2019
    ■ ■ ■ GESELLSCHAFT ı ÖSTERREICH ı UNGARN www.goeu.at STIPENDIENPROGRAMM 2019 Károly Pataki Ildiko Voller-Szenci ■ ■ ■ Projekt „Alpbach-Ungarn“ ■ ■ ■ Die Gesellschaft Österreich Ungarn unterstützte den Wiederaufbau einer ungarischen Alpbach-Alumnigruppe und organisierte für Alpbach 2019 die Teilnahme ungarischer StipendiatInnen. Das Forum Alpbach ist eine interdisziplinäre Plattform für Wissenschaft, Politik, Wirtschaft und Kultur. Sein Ziel ist es, internationale VerantwortungsträgerInnen aus allen gesellschaftlichen Bereichen mit engagierten jungen Menschen zu vernetzen, und im Dialog Impulse zur Weiterentwicklung des europäischen Integrationsprojekts zu setzen. 2019 haben uns nach Ausschreibung unseres Projektes insgesamt 21 Bewerbungen ungarischer StudentInnen erreicht. Nach einem Auswahlverfahren in Zusammenarbeit mit dem Forum Alpbach wurden acht Stipendien für jeweils vier Studentinnen und Studenten über die Gesellschaft Österreich Ungarn organisiert und mit Hilfe von Sponsoren finanziert. Den StipendiatInnen wurde dabei nicht nur die einmalige Möglichkeit geboten, am Europäischen Forum Alpbach teilzunehmen, ihr Netzwerk auszubauen und zu lernen, sondern auch von Rahmenveranstaltungen zu profitieren. So lud beispielsweise die österreichische Botschafterin in Budapest Elisabeth Ellison- Kramer die StipendiatInnen und PartnerInnen zu einem Mittagessen in die Residenz in Budapest ein. Auch einer der Partner, die Konzerngesellschaft UNION VIG Biztosító, organisierte für die StipendiatInnen ein Frühstück in Budapest. Darüber hinaus wurden die StipendiatInnen im darauffolgenden Jänner zu einem Wien- Tag, einem Mittagessen mit dem Vorstand der GÖU und unseren Kooperations- PartnerInnen eingeladen und daran anschließend zu einem Bericht bei der Generalversammlung der Gesellschaft Österreich Ungarn. Am selben Abend fand dann noch eine Veranstaltung in der Botschaft von Ungarn statt, bei der die StipendiatInnen mit Vizekanzler a.D. Dr. Erhard Busek, dem langjährigen Präsidenten des EFA, zu diskutieren und mehr übder die Geschichte des Forum Alpbach zu erfahren.
    [Show full text]
  • European Forum Alpbach 2015 EU Summer University on Strategic Trade Control and Non-Profileration DERYNCK Nele JANKOWITSCH Odett
    European Forum Alpbach 2015 EU Summer University on Strategic Trade Control and Non-Profileration DERYNCK Nele Head, Unit on Non-Fiscal Legislation, Belgian Customs Administration *1980 Master in Commercial Sciences, Postgraduate in Fiscal Sciences 2003-2005 Policy Advisor, Federal Parliament, Brussels 2005-2011 Inspector, Non Fiscal Legislation department of Customs, Belgian Customs Administration 2011-2014 Adviser, Non Fiscal Legislation department of Customs since 2014 Head, Non Fiscal Legislation department of Customs since 2015 Parnter in consortium for LTP Dual Use program and South East Asian program <> EU Summer University on Strategic Trade Control and Non-Profileration - EU Summer University on Strategic Trade Control and Non-Profileration JANKOWITSCH Odette, Dr. Expert on nuclear and international law, Vienna Doctorate of Law, Vienna University Postgraduate studies, The Hague Academy of International Law and London University College (Institute of advanced legal studies) since 1975 Senior Fellow, NYU School of Law faculty; Lecturer on international law and current UN practice at the Fairleigh Dickinson University, New Jersey legal and economic aspects of north-south relations, foreign investment laws and social & economic issues: 1978-1981 UN Centre on Transnational Corporations, NY 1983-1984 UNCESCO, Paris 1984-1987 UNIDO, Vienna 1987-2002 Senior Lawyer, Office of Legal Affairs, later Head of Section External Relations and Policy Coordination, IAEA since 2001 Lecturer, ISNL annual courses (International School of Nuclear Law, Univ. of Montpellier & OECD/NEA) Lectures at Abu Dhabi Sorbonne (PSUAD), ASARDA courses, ISPRA and Bangkok; TERI University New Delhi since 2002 Expert Consultatnt, legistlative assistance to countries of eastern Europe and West Africa, IAEA Publikationen/Publications Articles on nuclear law, notably OECD/ NEA Nuclear Law Bulletin.
    [Show full text]
  • IGAP Infopack Eng Novi Layout 1
    Initiative Group Alpbach Podgorica The European Forum Alpbach (EFA) The European Forum Alpbach (EFA) was founded in 1945, with the aim to promote the idea of European unity and to contribute to the process of peaceful unification of Europe. The Forum’s goals are to promote peace and stability through scientific cooperation, to encourage international collaboration and networking of young people and to contribute to development of the civil society. To achieve these goals, many simposiums are held at the Forum, such as architectoral, reform, economic, technological, political and medical simposium. The Forum is held in a small Tyrolean village Alpbach, every year from mid-August until the beginning of September. The Forum achieved remarkable reputation due to the fact that it had as participants, for many years, people like Karl Popper, Friedrich Hayek, Ban Ki-moon and other prominent leaders from many scientific and other areas. Nowadays, regular participants of the Forum are numerous government representatives, representatives of the EU institutions, as well as Nobel Prize laureats. Chairman of the Forum is dr Franz Fischler, the EU Commissioner for Agriculture, Rural Development and Fisheries (1995–2004) and former Federal Minister for Agriculture and Forestry in the Government of Austria. The profile of Montenegrin representatives can speak the best of importance of the EFA for Montenegro. In the recent years, Montenegrin representatives at the Forum were: current Prime Minister of Montenegro Igor Lukšić, prominent university professors Gordana Đurović (former Minister of the European Integration), Miodrag Perović and Milan Popović, Reis of the Islamic Community in Montenegro Rifat Fejzić, and others.
    [Show full text]
  • 1100903 [2011] RRTA 323 (3 May 2011)
    1100903 [2011] RRTA 323 (3 May 2011) DECISION RECORD RRT CASE NUMBER: 1100903 DIAC REFERENCE(S): CLF2010/129628 COUNTRY OF REFERENCE: Romania TRIBUNAL MEMBER: Paul Fisher DATE: 3 May 2011 PLACE OF DECISION: Melbourne DECISION: The Tribunal affirms the decision not to grant the applicant a Protection (Class XA) visa. STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS APPLICATION FOR REVIEW 1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship to refuse to grant the applicant a Protection (Class XA) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). 2. The applicant, who claims to be a dual citizen of Romania and Moldova, arrived in Australia on [date deleted under s.431(2) of the Migration Act 1958 as this information may identify the applicant] August 2010 and applied to the Department of Immigration and Citizenship for a Protection (Class XA) visa [in] September 2010. The delegate decided to refuse to grant the visa [in] December 2010 and notified the applicant of the decision and his review rights by letter [on the same date]. 3. The delegate refused the visa application on the basis that the applicant is not a person to whom Australia has protection obligations under the Refugees Convention 4. The applicant applied to the Tribunal [in] February 2011 for review of the delegate’s decision. 5. The Tribunal finds that the delegate’s decision is an RRT-reviewable decision under s.411(1)(c) of the Act. The Tribunal finds that the applicant has made a valid application for review under s.412 of the Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Roma As Alien Music and Identity of the Roma in Romania
    Roma as Alien Music and Identity of the Roma in Romania A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2018 Roderick Charles Lawford DECLARATION This work has not been submitted in substance for any other degree or award at this or any other university or place of learning, nor is being submitted concurrently in candidature for any degree or other award. Signed ………………………………………… Date ………………………… STATEMENT 1 This thesis is being submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PhD. Signed ………………………………………… Date ………………………… STATEMENT 2 This thesis is the result of my own independent work/investigation, except where otherwise stated, and the thesis has not been edited by a third party beyond what is permitted by Cardiff University’s Policy on the Use of Third Party Editors by Research Degree Students. Other sources are acknowledged by explicit references. The views expressed are my own. Signed ………………………………………… Date ………………………… STATEMENT 3 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available online in the University’s Open Access repository and for inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signed ………………………………………… Date ………………………… ii To Sue Lawford and In Memory of Marion Ethel Lawford (1924-1977) and Charles Alfred Lawford (1925-2010) iii Table of Contents List of Figures vi List of Plates vii List of Tables ix Conventions x Acknowledgements xii Abstract xiii Introduction 1 Chapter 1 - Theory and Method
    [Show full text]
  • Can Maidan Happen in Belarus? the Ukrainian
    Issue 2 (44), 2014 CAN MAIDAN HAPPEN IN BELARUS? Recent events in Ukraine have been a cause of Ukraine. By providing his assessment of Maidan concern to both politicians and the public. During he reviews Lukashenka’s statements on the issues the Maidan revolution and with the start of Rus- in Ukraine. Finally, Melyantsou acknowledges sian aggression, many analysts questioned whether that events in Ukraine could have been a signal something similar could happen in Belarus. This for the Belarusian government to strengthen its Dzianis Melyantsou is Senior issue of Bell attempts to answer this question. own influence in the country to avoid a similar Analyst at the Belarusian Institute scenario here. for Strategic Studies, Minsk. A Lukashenka’s response showed that he will make graduate of History Department every effort to ensure that neither of these things In the second article Andrei Yeliseyeu reviews the at the Mahilou State University, happen here under his rule. However, internal response of the Belarusian public to the Maidan he then studied Political Science economic problems and the fact that Belarus is de- revolution. Comparing various indicators he re- and International Relations at pendent on Russia for solutions to these problems veals that Ukrainians took to the streets for a va- the Institute for International hinder his actions. Even though it is too early to riety of objective reasons. The absence of such rea- Relations and Political Sciences expect Maidan in Belarus, the increasing Russian sons is the main obstacle why such events would in Vilnius (Lithuania), where he influence, which may manifest at any time in more not happen in Minsk.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Ownership Structure in Ukraine: Political Aspect Diana Dutsyk
    Media Ownership Structure in Ukraine: Political Aspect Diana Dutsyk, lecturer at the Kyiv Mohyla school of jounalism, chief‐editor of news website Glavred and news magazine Glavred The formation of the media ownership structure in independent Ukraine is diffucult and longlasting process which has not finished yet. This process can be split into several stages that to some extent overlap with presidencies of Leonid Kravchuk, Leonid Kuchma, and Viktor Yushchenko. First, national social and political media will be mentioned. Since that media are the main actors in the mass media sphere during the periods of political activity through their influence on public opinion.The analisys of the media ownership structire in Ukraine is based on the information from open sources. So, the first stage – early 90s of 20th century, the period of Leonid Kravchuk presidency In Soviet times, all Ukrainian (as well as generally Soviet) media were under the control of the state and the Communist Party: the actual founders of print media were different structures of the Communist Party and the Komsomol. And media’s funding went through these structures. Radio and television were fully owned by the state and financed from the state budget (Kulyk, 180). Apart from that, quantity of print media and broadcasters was limited. Therefore, in Soviet Ukraine there were only two TV channels and three radio stations. Quantity of central national newspapers also was insignificant. Some media democratization took place during the Mikhail Gorbachev’s Perestoika. In 1990 there was adopted the law "On press and other media” which proclaimed freedom of speech, prohibited censorship and allowed founding of media not only by the party structures, but also by other organisations, public and private enterprises, and even by separate individuals (Kulyk, 185).
    [Show full text]