And the Second (2016-2020) Country Programmes of UNFPA Belarus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

And the Second (2016-2020) Country Programmes of UNFPA Belarus Evaluation of the First (2011-2015) and the Second (2016-2020) Country Programmes of UNFPA Belarus Final Evaluation Report – 28 December 2019 Evaluation Team Evaluation Manager Mr. Aliaksandr Davidzenka Team Leader Ms. Sheila Reed and Sexual and Reproductive Health Expert Population and Development Expert Mr. Sergei Gotin Gender Equality Expert Mr. Ulad Vialichka 1 2 Table of contents Abbreviations and acronyms ................................................................................................................... 5 Table 1: Belarus: Key facts and figures ................................................................................................. 7 Figure 1: Map of Belarus - Source United Nations 2004 ..................................................................... 10 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 12 Chapter 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 17 1.1 Purpose and Objectives of the 1st and 2nd Country Programme Evaluation ................... 17 1.2 Scope of the evaluation and users .................................................................................. 17 1.3 Evaluation management and workplan ........................................................................... 18 1.4 Methodology and process ............................................................................................... 18 Chapter 2 Belarus Country Context ...................................................................................................... 23 2.1 Development challenges and national strategies ............................................................ 23 2.1.1 Economic, social and political context of Belarus ........................................................... 23 2.1.2 Situation with regard to Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights ............................ 24 2.13 Situation with regard to Population and Development .......................................................... 25 2.1 Situation with regard to Adolescents and Youth ............................................................. 26 2.1.4 Situation with regard to Gender Equality ......................................................................... 26 2.2 The role of external assistance ....................................................................................... 28 Chapter 3 The United Nations and UNFPA response and programme strategies ............................... 30 3.1 United Nations and UNFPA response .................................................................................... 30 3.2.1 UNFPA previous cycles of assistance, goals and achievements ....................................... 30 3.2.2 UNFPA Belarus 1st and 2nd Country Programmes ............................................................... 30 3.2.3 Financial structures of the programmes ............................................................................... 31 Chapter 4 Findings and answers to the evaluation questions .............................................................. 33 4.1 Relevance ............................................................................................................................... 33 4.2 Effectiveness – Sexual and Reporductive Health and Rights ................................................. 43 4.3 Effectiveness - Gender Equality .............................................................................................. 53 4.4 Effectiveness – Population Dynamics ..................................................................................... 60 4.5 Effectiveness – Emergency Preparedness ............................................................................. 69 4.6 Efficiency ................................................................................................................................. 71 4.7 Sustainability ........................................................................................................................... 76 4.8 Coordination ............................................................................................................................ 78 4.9 Added Value ................................................................................................................... 80 Chapter 5 Conclusions and Recommendations.................................................................................... 83 5.1 Conclusions 83 5.2 Recommendations ................................................................................................................... 85 5.2. 1 Strategic Recommendations 85 5.2.2 Programmatic recommendations 87 Table 1. Belarus Key Facts and Figures Table 2. Final Evaluation Questions 3 Table 3. Evaluation limitation and mitigation measures Table 4. Stakeholder selection criteria with Belarus sampling Table 5. UNDAF (2016-2020) Monitoring and Evaluation Calendar Table 6. Subgoal 2 Indicators for Belarus Table 7. Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights - Strengthened Policy and National Institutional Capacity: Output Indicators and Milestones Table 8. Output Indicators – SRHR Youth Table 9. Output indicators – Gender Equality Table 10. Output indicators – Population Dynamics Table 11. Output Indicators – Emergency Preparedness Table 12. Disbursement of UNFPA Belarus Core Resources (2014-2019) Table 13. Disbursement of Other Resources (2014-2019) Table 14. Output indicators Resources Mobilization, Communications, Partnerships, Knowledge Management Figure 1. Map of Belarus Figure 2. Population of Belarus by oblasts (regions) Figure 3. Gender and age pyramid by January 1, 2019 of the population of Belarus Figure 4. Violence against women Figure 6. External Assistance to Belarus Figure 7. Country Programme Funding Sources (2011-2015) and (2016-2020) Figure 8. Fund Allocation by Country Programme 2011-2015 Figure 9. Fund Allocation by Country Programme 2016-2020 Annexes (Separate) Annex 1: Persons Consulted Annex 2: Documents Consulted Annex 3: Stakeholder map Annex 4: Theories of Change – Belarus 1st and 2nd Country Programmes Annex 5:Terms of Reference Annex 6: Evaluation Matrix - Consolidated 4 Abbreviations and acronyms AIDS Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome ANC Antenatal Care ASRH Adolescent Sexual Reproductive Health AWP Annual Work Plans BELMED Project supporting the modernization of the health system in Belarus BELSTAT National Statistical Committee of Belarus CCA Common Country Assessment CEDAW Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women COAR Country Office Annual Report CP Country Programme CPD Country Programme Document CPE Country Programme Evaluation CPR Contraceptive Prevalence Rate CSO Civil Society Organizations DEX Directly Executed interventions EECARO Eastern Europe and Central Asia Regional Office (UNFPA) ERG Evaluation Reference Group EU European Union FACE Funding Authorization and Certificate of Expenditure form FGD Focus Group Discussion FP Family Planning GE Gender Equality GBV Gender Based Violence G Generations GDP Gross Domestic Product HDI Human Development Index HIV Human Immuno-deficiency virus HPV Human Papillomavirus ICPD International Conference on Population and Development LGBTI Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual, Trans-sexual, and intersexual MDG Millennium Development Goal MH Maternal Health MICS Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey MIS Management Information System MISP Minimum Initial Service Package MMR Maternal Mortality Ratio MOST Mobility Scheme for Targeted People-to-People Contacts MSM Men Who Have Sex with Men NCDs Non-communicable disease NCLLR National Center of Legislation and Legal Research of Belarus NEX Nationally executed interventions NHRI National Human Rights Institutions NSC National Statistical Committee (Belarus) OECD-DAC Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development – Development Assistance Committee PHC Primary Health Care P&D Population and Development PNC Post Natal Care PPH Post-Partum Haemorrhaging PSU Psychoactive Substance User QA Quality Assurance RC UN Resident Coordinator RH Reproductive Health SDG Sustainable Development Goal SOP Standard Operating Procedure SPR Standard Progress Report SRHR Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights STIs Sexually Transmitted Infections 5 TA Technical Assistance TB Tuberculosis TFR Total Fertility Rate TOC Theory of Change TOR Terms of Reference TOT Training of Trainers UNBRAF Unified Budget, Results and Accountability Framework UNDESA United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs UNDAF United Nations Development Assistance Framework UNECE United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UNEG United Nations Evaluation Group UNOPS United Nations Office for Project Services UNPF United Nations Programmatic Framework VAW Violence Against Women VET Vocational Education and Training WHO World Health Organization 6 Table 1: Belarus: Key facts and figures Key Facts and Figures Source The Republic of Belarus borders on five countries: north-west with Lithuania; north with Latvia and the Russian Federation; north-east and east - with the Russian Federation, south - with Ukraine; and the west - with Poland. The state languages are Belarusian and Russian. Belarus is divided into six administrative regions (oblasts), each centred around a major city: Minsk (the capital), Brest, Gomel, Grodno, Mogilev, and Vitebsk. Agriculture production includes grain, potatoes, vegetables,
Recommended publications
  • Views on Gender Related Statements Across Men and Women and Age Groups, % of Agreement, 2008
    Report No. Public Disclosure Authorized March 3, 2014 Public Disclosure Authorized Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Unit Europe and Central Asia Region Public Disclosure Authorized Document of the World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized CURRENCY AND EQUIVALENT UNITS Exchange Rate Effective as of December 24, 2013 Currency Unit = Belarusian Ruble US$1 = 9514.74 BYR FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS BEEPS Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey CEDAW Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and Development ECA Europe and Central Asia EVS European Values Survey FINDEX Financial Inclusion Database GNI Gross National Income HLSS Household Living Standards Survey IFC International Finance Corporation IT Information technology LiTS Life in Transition Survey NSC National Statistical Committee OLS Ordinary Least Squares UNECE United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UNFPA United Nations Population Fund UNICEF United Nations Children's Fund US United States WDI World Development Indicators WHO World Health Organization Vice President: Laura Tuck Country Director: Qimiao Fan Sector Director: Roumeen Islam Sector Manager: Carolina Sanchez Task Team Leader: Sarosh Sattar ...................................................... 1 ............................................................................................ 3 ................................................................................................... 4 ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The EU and Belarus – a Relationship with Reservations Dr
    BELARUS AND THE EU: FROM ISOLATION TOWARDS COOPERATION EDITED BY DR. HANS-GEORG WIECK AND STEPHAN MALERIUS VILNIUS 2011 UDK 327(476+4) Be-131 BELARUS AND THE EU: FROM ISOLATION TOWARDS COOPERATION Authors: Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck, Dr. Vitali Silitski, Dr. Kai-Olaf Lang, Dr. Martin Koopmann, Andrei Yahorau, Dr. Svetlana Matskevich, Valeri Fadeev, Dr. Andrei Kazakevich, Dr. Mikhail Pastukhou, Leonid Kalitenya, Alexander Chubrik Editors: Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck, Stephan Malerius This is a joint publication of the Centre for European Studies and the Konrad- Adenauer-Stiftung. This publication has received funding from the European Parliament. Sole responsibility for facts or opinions expressed in this publication rests with the authors. The Centre for European Studies, the Konrad-Adenauer- Stiftung and the European Parliament assume no responsibility either for the information contained in the publication or its subsequent use. ISBN 978-609-95320-1-1 © 2011, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V., Sankt Augustin / Berlin © Front cover photo: Jan Brykczynski CONTENTS 5 | Consultancy PROJECT: BELARUS AND THE EU Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck 13 | BELARUS IN AN INTERnational CONTEXT Dr. Vitali Silitski 22 | THE EU and BELARUS – A Relationship WITH RESERvations Dr. Kai-Olaf Lang, Dr. Martin Koopmann 34 | CIVIL SOCIETY: AN analysis OF THE situation AND diRECTIONS FOR REFORM Andrei Yahorau 53 | Education IN BELARUS: REFORM AND COOPERation WITH THE EU Dr. Svetlana Matskevich 70 | State bodies, CONSTITUTIONAL REALITY AND FORMS OF RULE Valeri Fadeev 79 | JudiciaRY AND law
    [Show full text]
  • Barriers to Constitutional Rule in Belarus Eric R
    Hastings International and Comparative Law Review Volume 28 Article 7 Number 1 Fall 2004 1-1-2004 Descent into Authoritarianism: Barriers to Constitutional Rule in Belarus Eric R. Reed Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_international_comparative_law_review Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Eric R. Reed, Descent into Authoritarianism: Barriers to Constitutional Rule in Belarus, 28 Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 147 (2004). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_international_comparative_law_review/vol28/iss1/7 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings International and Comparative Law Review by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Descent into Authoritarianism: Barriers to Constitutional Rule in Belarus By ERIC R. REED* Introduction The collapse of the Soviet Union has allowed the legal community to observe the creation and early trials of several new constitutions. One notable commentator referred to East-Central Europe as a "constitutional laboratory."' Few expected the rule of law to graft easily onto governments and peoples ruled for decades by authoritarian regimes. As expected, the progress made by these states in the last decade varies. Belarus arguably achieved least, and remains classified generally as a state reverting to authoritarianism. 2 President and former collective farm manager Alexander Lukashenka's political abuses deserve some share of blame for this backsliding. However, additional political, social, and judicial factors hinder Belarus' transition to the rule of law.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Women Take to the Streets of Minsk
    Why Women Take to the Streets of Minsk An Interview Study of Female Protesters’ Motivations Mathilda Gustafsson Bachelor’s thesis, 15 credits December 2020 Political Science C Department of Government Supervisor: Katrin Uba Word count: 13840 Pages: 38 Abstract While there are numerous examples of research investigating who would protest and why, the research fields of social movements and political participation have not done enough to understand the motivations of women in protest. Nor are there enough studies of the mobilisation of women in anti-regime protest in a post-communist context. This thesis investigates what motivates women in non-democratic settings to participate in protest, despite the elevated costs and risks given the context. It examines Belarus, a protest movement where women have taken on a prevalent role in the protest movement of 2020. The research design is a within-case study using the method of in-depth interviews. I conduct interviews with ten Belarusian female protesters who are found primarily via a snowball sampling technique. The transcribed interviews are analysed using a framework of collective and selective incentives. The study finds that discontent with the government and belief in the movement’s success are significant motivations, while there is not belief that their own participation will enhance the likelihood of success. Results also show that respondents were motivated by the violence used against protesters, a newfound sense of community between Belarusians, solidarity with protesters, the peaceful repertoires in the movement and group belongingness with other women. Taken together, these results deepen our understanding of protests as motivations in themselves and of motivation as a resource, but foremost of why women protest.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender and Employment in the South Caucasus and Western
    Gender and employment in the South Caucasus and Western CIS Tamar Khitarishvili FLORIN MARIN Executive summary Gender disparities negatively impact labour markets, and limit the prospects for robust, sustainable, and inclusive growth in the countries of South Caucasus (Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia) and Western CIS (Belarus, Moldova and Ukraine). Labour force participation, employment and unemployment: female labour force participation rates remain below men’s rates. The labour force participation and employment rates for men and women have either remained stable or declined over the last two decades. However, the rates for females remain lower than their male counterparts. On the other hand, unemployment rates have been generally lower for women than for men, except in Armenia and Azerbaijan. Employment composition: female employment is less secure. Women are underrepresented as both wage earners and as employers in all six countries. In the countries with high rates of self-employment (e.g. Armenia, Georgia and Azerbaijan), women are overrepresented in the category of contributing family workers. Wage gaps: women earn as much as 78 percent (Ukraine) and as little as 50 percent (Azerbaijan) of their male counterparts. Research has shown that some of the wage gaps are due to industrial and occupational segregation, or the result of women working fewer hours than men. However, a large portion of the gap could be attributed to gender discrimination. While gender wage inequality has improved in most countries in the region, it has increased in Belarus and more recently in Azerbaijan. Entrepreneurship: female entrepreneurs face greater barriers in accessing credit and tend to have weaker networks in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Official Records Twenty-Third Special Session
    United Nations A/S-23/PV.3 General Assembly Official Records Twenty-third special session 3rd meeting Tuesday, 6 June 2000, 10 a.m. New York President: Mr. Gurirab ............................................. (Namibia) The meeting was called to order at 10.05 a.m. strategic plan, which covers the period 1996 to 2001, identifies five priority areas: first, the persistent and growing burden of poverty on women and their Agenda items 8 and 9 (continued) unequal access to resources and lack of participation in economic structures and policies; secondly, inequality Review and appraisal of progress made in the in access to opportunities in education, skills implementation of the twelve critical areas of development and training; thirdly, women’s unequal concern in the Beijing Platform for Action access to health and related services; fourthly, Further actions and initiatives for overcoming inequality between women and men in the sharing of obstacles to the implementation of the Beijing power and decision-making; and fifthly, the rights of Platform for Action the girl child. In addition, there are six underlying and cross- The President: The Assembly will first hear a cutting issues identified as important in addressing the statement by His Excellency The Right Honourable critical areas of concern. The cross-cutting issues are as Lieutenant-General Christon Tembo, Vice-President of follows: first, the critical role of the media at all levels; the Republic of Zambia. secondly, the need for gender-disaggregated data; Lieutenant-General Tembo (Zambia): Allow me thirdly, the establishment of effective institutional to express my Government’s appreciation that a nation mechanisms; fourthly, promoting the human rights of of our subregional grouping, the Southern African women; fifthly, considering the implications of cultural Development Community (SADC), through you, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 22 September 2017
    United Nations A/72/493 General Assembly Distr.: General 22 September 2017 Original: English Seventy-second session Agenda item 72 (c) Promotion and protection of human rights: human rights situations and reports of special rapporteurs and representatives Situation of human rights in Belarus* Note by the Secretary-General The Secretary-General has the honour to transmit to the General Assembly the report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Belarus, Miklós Haraszti, submitted in accordance with Human Rights Council resolution 32/26. * The present report was submitted after the deadline to take into account information received by the Special Rapporteur during his trip to Minsk in July 2017. 17-16691 (E) 031017 *1716691* A/72/493 Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Belarus Summary The present report is submitted by the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Belarus in accordance with Human Rights Council resolution 32/26. The report examines the relationship between the unique features of governance of Belarus and its situation of human rights. It concludes that one of the main structural reasons for both the entrenched systemic abuse of human rights and the cyclical waves of mass repression in the country is that all powers are assumed by the executive branch, chiefly the President and the presidential administration. Although the Constitution provides for the separation of powers and respect for human rights, the reality is a monolithic power structure with laws and governance aimed at maintaining the concentration of powers and an absence of effective human rights guarantees.
    [Show full text]
  • Intensification of Menopausal Symptoms Among Female Inhabitants of East European Countries
    Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine 2016, Vol 23, No 3, 517–524 ORIGINAL ARTICLE www.aaem.pl Intensification of menopausal symptoms among female inhabitants of East European countries Iwona Bojar1, Oleh Lyubinets2, Jozef Novotny3, Yaroslav Stanchak4, Evgenii Tiszczenko 5, Alfred Owoc6, Dorota Raczkiewicz7 1 Department for Woman Health, Institute of Rural Health, Lublin, Poland 2 Department Public Health Management, Lviv National Medical University named after Danylo Halytskyi, Ukraine 3 College of Polytechnics, Department of Health Care Studies, JIHLAVA, Czech Republic 4 University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Trnava, Slovak Republic 5 State Medical University, Grodno, Belorus 6 Centre for Public Health and Health Promotion, Institute of Rural Health, Lublin, Poland 7 Institute of Statistics and Demography, Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland Bojar I, Lyubinets O, Novotny J, Stanchak J, Tiszczenko E, Owoc A, Raczkiewicz D. Intensification of menopausal symptoms among female inhabitants of East European countries. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2016; 23(3): 517–524. doi: 10.5604/12321966.1219198 Abstract The objective of the study was analysis of the occurrence and intensity of menopausal symptoms in postmenopausal women from Poland, Belarus, Ukraine, Czech Republic, Slovakia and Poland. The study was conducted during the period 2014–2015 among postmenopausal women living in the areas of Poland, Belarus, Ukraine, Czech Republic and Slovakia. The degree of menopausal complaints was assessed using the Kupperman Menopausal Index and Greene Climacteric Scale. The respondents were additionally asked about age, educational level, place of residence, marital status and age at last menstrual period. Into the study were enrolled women aged 50–65, minimum 2 years after the last menstrual period, who had a generally good state of health and did not use hormone replacement therapy.
    [Show full text]
  • Belarus: an Overview
    Updated March 12, 2021 Belarus: An Overview Since 2020, Belarusian politics and society have undergone wife, Veranika Tsapkala, joined her on the campaign. The a transformation many observers view as both tragic and three women attracted tens of thousands to demonstrations. inspiring. Before Belarus’s August 2020 presidential election, opposition candidate Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya Given Lukashenko’s authoritarian rule, observers did not mounted an unexpectedly strong campaign against expect Tsikhanouskaya to win the election. However, the Aleksandr Lukashenko, who has ruled Belarus for more official pronouncement that Lukashenko won with an than 26 years. Protests against allegedly widespread evidently exaggerated 80% of the vote (to 10% for electoral fraud and a brutal crackdown on protestors led to Tsikhanouskaya) quickly led to protests. The brutal the rise of a mass opposition movement, on a scale unseen crackdown that followed led to larger protests that many since Belarus became independent in 1991. Human rights observers characterized as “leaderless” and sometimes activists and monitors report more than 32,000 Belarusians, attracted hundreds of thousands. Protests have since including journalists, have been temporarily detained or dwindled in frequency and size, but activists have adopted imprisoned and consider about 200 to be political prisoners. new methods of protest and engagement. At least 10 demonstrators and others have been killed or died under suspicious circumstances. Figure 1. Belarus at a Glance The United States, the European Union (EU), and others have called for an end to the crackdown and for the government to conduct a dialogue with the opposition and hold democratic presidential elections. Political Background In past years, observers have debated whether Lukashenko could be encouraged to preside over a “softer” and more development-oriented authoritarian regime, but political openings in Belarus have been modest and short-lived.
    [Show full text]
  • Anais-Marin-Union-State-Of-Belarus
    ANAÏS MARIN THE UNION STATE OF BELARUS AND RUSSIA. MYTHS AND REALITIES OF POLITICAL-MILITARY INTEGRATION © 2020 Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis www.vilniusinstitute.lt ISBN 978-609-8281-00-2 COVER: Presidential Press and Information Office THE UNION STATE OF BELARUS AND RUSSIA – BY ANAÏS MARIN TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 THE UNION STATE AT TWENTY ........................................................................................... 2 A dead-born vanity project ..................................................................................................... 3 Irreconcilable views ................................................................................................................. 3 From stalemate to ultimatum… and back to square one ....................................................... 5 DEBUNKING THREE BROTHERHOOD MYTHS ....................................................................... 7 Myth #1. “Belarus is Russia’s closest military ally” ................................................................. 7 Brothers in arms .................................................................................................................. 7 Cracks in the façade ............................................................................................................ 8 Belarus’ security dilemma and entrapment ........................................................................ 9 Disputes
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Equality in Ageing Societies
    PolicyPolicybrief Gender equality in UNECE Policy Brief on Ageing No. 23 ageing societies March 2020 Challenging context Contents Faced with p0pulation ageing, countries in the UNECE region Introduction ....................................................2 are preparing for growing numbers of older persons receiving Gender and the demographics of population pensions and needing health and long-term care services. An ageing ..............................................................2 important societal adaptation to ageing has been to increase the Implications of adaptations to population labour market participation among women and older persons to ageing ..............................................................4 ensure the sustainability of social security and protection systems. Strategies to promote gender equality in ageing It is now time that regulatory frameworks, financial provisions societies ...........................................................6 and services support the equal sharing of paid and unpaid work Prevent the accumulation of gendered in families, households and communities between women and disadvanges over the life course .....................7 men to close prevailing gender gaps in care, employment, earnings Mitigate gender inequality in older age ....... 16 and pensions. Unless gender- and age-responsive reforms are addressing the multiple dimensions of gender inequality in ageing Mainstream gender in societal adaptations to demographic change ............ 21 societies, women risk to be disproportionately
    [Show full text]
  • The Government of Belarus: Crushing Human Rights at Home?
    THE GOVERNMENT OF BELARUS: CRUSHING HUMAN RIGHTS AT HOME? JOINT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON AFRICA, GLOBAL HEALTH, AND HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON EUROPE AND EURASIA OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION APRIL 1, 2011 Serial No. 112–56 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.foreignaffairs.house.gov/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 65–497PDF WASHINGTON : 2011 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 10:51 Oct 04, 2011 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 F:\WORK\AGH\040111\65497 HFA PsN: SHIRL COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida, Chairman CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey HOWARD L. BERMAN, California DAN BURTON, Indiana GARY L. ACKERMAN, New York ELTON GALLEGLY, California ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American DANA ROHRABACHER, California Samoa DONALD A. MANZULLO, Illinois DONALD M. PAYNE, New Jersey EDWARD R. ROYCE, California BRAD SHERMAN, California STEVE CHABOT, Ohio ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York RON PAUL, Texas GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York MIKE PENCE, Indiana RUSS CARNAHAN, Missouri JOE WILSON, South Carolina ALBIO SIRES, New Jersey CONNIE MACK, Florida GERALD E. CONNOLLY, Virginia JEFF FORTENBERRY, Nebraska THEODORE E. DEUTCH, Florida MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas DENNIS CARDOZA, California TED POE, Texas BEN CHANDLER, Kentucky GUS M. BILIRAKIS, Florida BRIAN HIGGINS, New York JEAN SCHMIDT, Ohio ALLYSON SCHWARTZ, Pennsylvania BILL JOHNSON, Ohio CHRISTOPHER S.
    [Show full text]