DOCSLIB.ORG

The Case of "Sturgeon Advocates"

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Case of © SHUTTERSTOCK THE CASE OF "STURGEON ADVOCATES" THURSDAY, 14/09/2017 - 9am* AN APPROACH TO WINNING FISHERMEN'S SUPPORT FOR STURGEON CONSERVATION IN THE LOWER DANUBE REGION: THE CASE OF "STURGEON ADVOCATES" / (23) HUMAN IMPACTS The Danube remains a key European river system where Approximately 500 fishermen in 34 communities were protection of existing sturgeon is still possible. Commer- engaged in over 750 individual conservations through cial fishing of all wild sturgeon species and marketing of local personal communicators, known as "Sturgeon their related products are currently strictly prohibited in Advocates". Consistent interactions built trust between the Lower Danube region (except for Sterlet in Serbia), WWF and the locals, prompted continuous engagement yet lack of awareness of such bans, inadequate conserva- and allowed for a deep understanding of illegal sturgeon tion incentives, and general distrust in public institutions fishing, suggesting that "Sturgeon Advocates" can be an has led to a loose application of the law. The session will effective vehicle for conservation acceptance. © discuss findings from a transnational LIFE-funded WWF project implemented by WWF in Bulgaria and Romania between 2012 and 2015, which aimed at halting sturgeon poaching and illegal trade in the region through innova- tive community-based conservation mechanisms. *ask a member of the WWF staff for the venue For more information Roselina Peneva Jutta Jahrl Regional Communica- THE EU Project Manager LIFE tions Officer [email protected] [email protected] WAS REPORTED TO BE THE WORLD'S LARGEST IMPORTER OF +43 1 48817 264 +359 885 829886 CAVIAR FOR THE PERIOD 1999-2006 www.danube-sturgeons.org tive community-basedlegal fishing and trade. conservation mechanisms. LIFE FOR DANUBE STURGEONS VISITS TO 22 COMMUNITIES1, 126 FISHING COMMUNITIES MEMBERS engaged in conversations around the project OUR WORK SO FAR IN NUMBERS LIFE FOR 25 VISITS TO 1 REGIONAL WORKSHOP OF ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS IN 22 COMMUNITIES1, 126 FISHING COMMUNITIES MEMBERS engaged in conversations around the project ROMANIA AND UKRAINE to foster sharing of knowledge , ex- periences and best practice procedures and reinforce trans- DANUBE boundary cooperation and effective cross-border measures PARTICIPATION IN 2 INFODAYS (Brussels & Bucharest) 3 LOCAL COMMUNITIES CELEBRATIONS of Danube STURGEON Day (Prahovo, Vylkove, Belene) 2 PUBLIC EVENTS (Balchik & Bucharest) 1 VOLUNTEER PROGRAMME (Vylkove) S at I SS 8 IN BE L FO UGA © T SHEE H 6 TRAININGS WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT O M AS AUTHORITIES IN UKRAINE H T ASENBERGER-S 151 PARTICIPANTS IN TOTAL H UTTERSTOC STAKEHOLDER COMMITTEE MEETING IN ROMANIA with representatives of NAFA, police, patrol, DDBRA K ¹ Bulgaria-Danube: Belene, Tutrakan, Nikopol, Vidin-Novo Selo, Lomo; Bulgaria-Black Sea: Balchik, Krapec/Durankulak, Varna, Kavarna, Byala, Chernmomorets/Kraimorie-Bourgas; Romania: Fetesti, Borcea, Galati, Giurgeni-Vadu Oii, Jurilovca, Isaccea; Serbia: Prahovo, Radujevac, Negotin; Ukraine: Leski, Vykove. WWF'S WORK ON STURGEONS WWF's Network Sturgeon Strategy was developed through a series of discussions of interested WWF offices and programmes together with external WWF partner organisations, which aims to foster synergies and co- WWW. operation. It maps out the main areas of work for WWF on sturgeon conservation in the next 5 years, focusing on the following: • Combatting overexploitation; DANUBE- • Restoring life-cycle habitats; • Conservation stocking; • Communication (cross-cutting strategy of general importance). The outcomes proposed in the WWF Network Sturgeon Strategy will STURGEONS help to bring resources together for better and more comprehensive protection and restoration of sturgeons worldwide. .ORG © WWF-DCP-BU WWF and their project partners gratefully acknowledge funding support from the European Commission. All con- tent and opinions expressed on this factsheet are solely those of WWF and their project partners. L GARIA LAUNCHED ON.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Company Profile
    www.ecobulpack.com COMPANY PROFILE KEEP BULGARIA CLEAN FOR THE CHILDREN! PHILIPPE ROMBAUT Chairman of the Board of Directors of ECOBULPACK Executive Director of AGROPOLYCHIM JSC-Devnia e, ECOBULPACK are dedicated to keeping clean the environment of the country we live Wand raise our children in. This is why we rely on good partnerships with the State and Municipal Authorities, as well as the responsible business managers who have supported our efforts from the very beginning of our activity. Because all together we believe in the cause: “Keep Bulgaria clean for the children!” VIDIO VIDEV Executive Director of ECOBULPACK Executive Director of NIVA JSC-Kostinbrod,VIDONA JSC-Yambol t ECOBULPACK we guarantee the balance of interests between the companies releasing A packed goods on the market, on one hand, and the companies collecting and recycling waste, on the other. Thus we manage waste throughout its course - from generation to recycling. The funds ECOBULPACK accumulates are invested in the establishment of sustainable municipal separate waste collection systems following established European models with proven efficiency. DIMITAR ZOROV Executive Director of ECOBULPACK Owner of “PARSHEVITSA” Dairy Products ince the establishment of the company we have relied on the principles of democracy as Swell as on an open and fair strategy. We welcome new shareholders. We offer the business an alternative in fulfilling its obligations to utilize packaged waste, while meeting national legislative requirements. We achieve shared responsibilities and reduce companies’ product- packaging fees. MILEN DIMITROV Procurator of ECOBULPACK s a result of our joint efforts and the professionalism of our work, we managed to turn AECOBULPACK JSC into the largest organization utilizing packaging waste, which so far have gained the confidence of more than 3 500 companies operating in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Research Division Country Profile: Bulgaria, October 2006
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Bulgaria, October 2006 COUNTRY PROFILE: BULGARIA October 2006 COUNTRY Formal Name: Republic of Bulgaria (Republika Bŭlgariya). Short Form: Bulgaria. Term for Citizens(s): Bulgarian(s). Capital: Sofia. Click to Enlarge Image Other Major Cities (in order of population): Plovdiv, Varna, Burgas, Ruse, Stara Zagora, Pleven, and Sliven. Independence: Bulgaria recognizes its independence day as September 22, 1908, when the Kingdom of Bulgaria declared its independence from the Ottoman Empire. Public Holidays: Bulgaria celebrates the following national holidays: New Year’s (January 1); National Day (March 3); Orthodox Easter (variable date in April or early May); Labor Day (May 1); St. George’s Day or Army Day (May 6); Education Day (May 24); Unification Day (September 6); Independence Day (September 22); Leaders of the Bulgarian Revival Day (November 1); and Christmas (December 24–26). Flag: The flag of Bulgaria has three equal horizontal stripes of white (top), green, and red. Click to Enlarge Image HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Early Settlement and Empire: According to archaeologists, present-day Bulgaria first attracted human settlement as early as the Neolithic Age, about 5000 B.C. The first known civilization in the region was that of the Thracians, whose culture reached a peak in the sixth century B.C. Because of disunity, in the ensuing centuries Thracian territory was occupied successively by the Greeks, Persians, Macedonians, and Romans. A Thracian kingdom still existed under the Roman Empire until the first century A.D., when Thrace was incorporated into the empire, and Serditsa was established as a trading center on the site of the modern Bulgarian capital, Sofia.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Achievements Our Work in Photos and Media
    LIFE FOR DANUBE STURGEONS LIFE 15/GIE/AT/001004 NEWSLETTER | July 2017 Our achievements Website is up and running, you may check it out! http://danube-sturgeons.org Content-related improvements are pending, including translation into national languages. Baseline questionnaires are ready for use for fishing communities and law enforcement authorities in Ukraine and Serbia. Capacity-building workshops with authorities on sturgeon biology and conservation have kicked-off in Ukraine. Insofar, 6 such trainings for the Fish Agency have been held. May, Odessa| WWF-UA facilitated a regional workshop between DDBRA (RO) and DDBR (UA) authorities to improve cross-border cooperation on sturgeon protection (memos here). May, Brussels| Our project was featured at the LIFE Information & Networking Event in Brussels (part of the Green Week), with a presentation held by Jutta (presentation & video). June, Sofia | The first communications team workshop was held, which led to the finalisation of the regional communications strategy (memos here) June, Bucharest | The first Stakeholder Committee meeting was organized, with participation from the police, customs, NAFA, DDBRA. Our project was presented at the LIFE Info Day event in Bucharest by DDBRA (RO); the team received very good feedback from the LIFE monitoring team in Ro (NEEMO GEIE) June | Teams in BG, RS, UA celebrated the Danube Day in schools and local communities. Our work in photos and media Authorities in Ukraine and Romania meet in Odessa First National Stakeholder Committee meeting in Communications
    [Show full text]
  • Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR
    Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi,
    [Show full text]
  • Manual on Border Controls Along the Danube and Its Navigable Tributaries
    EU Strategy for the Danube Region Priority Area 1a – To improve mobility and multimodality: Inland waterways Practical manual on border controls along the Danube and its navigable tributaries Author(s): Milica Gvozdic (viadonau) Simon Hartl (viadonau) Katja Rosner (viadonau) Version (date): 31.08.2015 1 General information .................................................................................................................. 4 2 How to use this manual? .......................................................................................................... 5 3 Geographic scope .................................................................................................................... 5 4 Hungary ................................................................................................................................... 7 4.1 General information on border controls ................................................................................... 7 4.1.1 Control process ................................................................................................................... 8 4.1.2 Control forms ..................................................................................................................... 10 4.1.3 Additional information ....................................................................................................... 21 4.2 Information on specific border control points ......................................................................... 22 4.2.1 Mohács .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Update of the List of Border Crossing Points Referred to In
    C 244/22 EN Official Journal of the European Union 26.7.2014 Update of the list of border crossing points referred to in Article 2(8) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (OJ C 316, 28.12.2007, p. 1; OJ C 134, 31.5.2008, p. 16; OJ C 177, 12.7.2008, p. 9; OJ C 200, 6.8.2008, p. 10; OJ C 331, 31.12.2008, p. 13; OJ C 3, 8.1.2009, p. 10; OJ C 37, 14.2.2009, p. 10; OJ C 64, 19.3.2009, p. 20; OJ C 99, 30.4.2009, p. 7; OJ C 229, 23.9.2009, p. 28; OJ C 263, 5.11.2009, p. 22; OJ C 298, 8.12.2009, p. 17; OJ C 74, 24.3.2010, p. 13; OJ C 326, 3.12.2010, p. 17; OJ C 355, 29.12.2010, p. 34; OJ C 22, 22.1.2011, p. 22; OJ C 37, 5.2.2011, p. 12; OJ C 149, 20.5.2011, p. 8; OJ C 190, 30.6.2011, p. 17; OJ C 203, 9.7.2011, p. 14; OJ C 210, 16.7.2011, p. 30; OJ C 271, 14.9.2011, p. 18; OJ C 356, 6.12.2011, p. 12; OJ C 111, 18.4.2012, p. 3; OJ C 183, 23.6.2012, p. 7; OJ C 313, 17.10.2012, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear-Free Future for the Belene Site
    reactors. This amount will be paid by the Bulgarian company NEC as a result of the arbitration case brought by Atomstroyexport. NUCLEAR-FREE FUTURE The equipment was ordered in the absence of a signed contract for construction, with no implementation deadlines, and even without an order from the competent minister! FOR THE BELENE SITE A review of the various costs reveals that huge amounts were paid by the Bulgarian taxpayer for illogical and meaningless activities, considering the failure to realise a functioning plant. Dismantling the existing buildings, structures and parts cost 199 million BGN / 101 million euro. Architectural engineering of the project by Worley Parsons and Bulgarian subcontractor Risk Engineering cost 393 million BGN / 200 million euro. Evidently, we are dealing with corruption on a large scale. In 2012 Za Zemiata launched a nation-wide competition, collecting Unfortunately, so far the Prosecutor’s Office has been investigat- ideas for a nuclear-free use of the Belene site, in which very interesting ing only two former heads of NEC, as well as ex-Minister of Econ- proposals were received. All good ideas were sent to the government, omy and Energy, P.Dimitrov, for concluding a disadvantageous with the suggestion that the state should organize a similar national transaction to the detriment of NEC, amounting to 77.1 million or international competition that would be open to business as well. euro. The transaction in question concerns the old equipment for Unfortunately, there was no answer, so today we continue asking: NPP Belene produced by Skoda, which was sold to the Russian For how much longer will the Belene site incur only costs? Following Atomstroyexport.
    [Show full text]
  • BULGARIA: Options to Improve Security of Gas Supply Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: ACS4278
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized BULGARIA: Security ofGasSupply Options toImprove Report No: ACS4278 Republic of Bulgaria: Options to Improve Security of Gas Supply June 2013 Sustainable Development Department (ECSSD) Europe and Central Asia Region (ECA) Standard Disclaimer: . World Bank and Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP) reports are published to communicate the results of Bank and ESMAP work to the development community with the least possible delay. Some sources cited in this paper may be informal documents that are not readily available. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this report are entirely those of the author(s) and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, or its affiliated organizations, or to members of its board of executive directors for the countries they represent, or to ESMAP. The World Bank and ESMAP do not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any consequence of their use. The boundaries, colors, denominations, other information shown on any map in this volume do not imply on the part of the World Bank Group any judgment on the legal status of any territory or the endorsement of acceptance of such boundaries. Copyright Statement: The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly.
    [Show full text]
  • Investment in Bulgaria 2018 | 121
    Investment in Bulgaria 2018 | 121 Investment in Bulgaria 2018 KPMG in Bulgaria kpmg.com/bg © 2018 KPMG Bulgaria EOOD, a Bulgarian limited liability company and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. Investment in Bulgaria Edition 2018 Investment in Bulgaria 2018 | 3 Preface Investment in Bulgaria is one of a series of booklets published by firms within the KPMG network to provide information to those considering investing or doing business internationally. Every care has been taken to ensure that the information presented in this publication is correct and reflects the situation as of April 2018 unless otherwise stated. Its purpose is to provide general guidelines on investment and business in Bulgaria. As the economic situation is undergoing rapid change, further advice should be sought before making any specific decisions. For further information on matters discussed in this publication, please contact Gergana Mantarkova, Managing Partner. KPMG in Bulgaria Sofia Varna 45/A Bulgaria Boulevard 3 Sofia Street, floor 2 1404 Sofia 9000 Varna Bulgaria Bulgaria Tel: +359 2 96 97 300 Tel: +359 52 699 650 Fax: +359 2 96 97 878 Fax: +359 52 611 502 [email protected] kpmg.com/bg © 2018 KPMG Bulgaria EOOD, a Bulgarian limited liability company and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Coping Behaviour of Ethnic Turks Against State Atrocities During the Jivkov Regime in Bulgaria
    1 COPING WITH STATE TERROR: COPING BEHAVIOUR OF ETHNIC TURKS AGAINST STATE ATROCITIES DURING THE JIVKOV REGIME IN BULGARIA Prof. Dr. Beğlan TOĞROL ÖZET: Çeşitli baskı (stress) durumlarına karşı başa çıkma (coping) yöntemleri in­ san psikolojisinin en önemli konularından birisidir. Bu konunun kişisel düzeyde ele alınmasıyla ilgili olarak birçok teknikler üretilmiş, çaresizliğe karşı alınabi­ lecek ve hayat kalitesini yükseltebilecek önlemler tartışıla gelmiştir. Ancak, bir toplumun başka bir toplum üzerindeki baskılarıyla ezilen toplumun, silahlı çatış­ ma dışındaki karşı koyma yöntemleriyle ilgili sistematik araştırmalar, yok değil­ se bile çok azdır. Yüzyılımızda teknolojiye bağlı ilerlemeler, bu ilerlemelerin in­ sanlığa getirdikleri imkan ve mutlulukların yamsıra insanlığın saldırganlık insi­ yaklarının da daha dakik ve korkunç şekillere dönüşebileceğini göstermiştir. Da­ ha Birinci Dünya Savaşı'nı takiben ve İkinci Dünya Savaşıyla birlikte ve onu ta­ kip eden sürede bazı politik sistemlerde devlet eliyle organize edilen ve bazı azınlık gruplarına karşı yöneltilen çeşitli baskı sistemleri, Buchenwald, Ausc­ hwitz, Gulag Takım Adaları, Kore esir kampları ve Belene gibi çeşitli terör odaklarını ortaya çıkarmıştır. Bunlar arasında bilhassa Nazi Almanya'sında olan­ lar, Savaşı müteakip çeşitli açılardan ele alınarak incelenmiştir. Jivkov'un Bulga­ ristan'ında olanlar ise, bilhassa 1980'lerden sonra Türk toplumuna yöneltilen baskı ve zulümler, Nazi Almanya'sında uygulananlarla pek çok bakımlardan benzerlik göstermesine rağmen batılı bilim
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Bulgaria in 2009
    2009 Minerals Yearbook BULGARIA [ADVANCE RELEASE] U.S. Department of the Interior November 2010 U.S. Geological Survey THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF BULGARIA By Mark Brininstool Bulgaria’s mineral industry included mine output of metal 2008. The tankhouse reached its original designed capacity ores, mineral fuels (mainly coal), and a variety of industrial of 180,000 metric tons per year (t/yr) in October 2008, but minerals. Additionally, the metallurgical sector smelted and production capacity increased to 200,000 t/yr by the end of 2008 refined copper, lead, silver, steel, and zinc. On a world scale, owing to improvements in the production process (Aurubis AG, however, Bulgaria’s mineral industry was small and mainly 2009a, p. 66; b). of regional importance. Bulgaria had the potential to become After it obtained its final construction permits, Dundee a relatively important natural gas transit country because the Precious Metals Inc. of Canada began construction to expand planned South Stream and Nabucco pipelines were to pass its mine and mill at Chelopech to increase production capacity through the country. to about 150,000 t/yr of copper concentrate and 140,000 troy ounces per year of gold in concentrate by 2012. All Chelopech Minerals in the National Economy Mine’s copper concentrate was to be supplied to Dundee’s Tsumeb smelter in Namibia, but the company also had plans to In 2009, Bulgaria’s gross domestic product (GDP) decreased build a metal processing plant to produce copper cathodes and by about 5% compared with the country’s GDP in 2008, and gold doré in Chelopech.
    [Show full text]
  • Chisinau DFCBD 27 Oct 2017
    Building a multi-level governance and coordination system to make Ukraine an active participant in the Danube Strategy process Igor Studennikov Executive Director Centre for Regional Studies, Odessa, Ukraine Member of the Executive Committee of the Danube Civil Society Forum DANUBE FINANCING AND CAPACITY BUILDING DIALOGUE Chișinău , 26-27 October 2017 Ukrainian part of the Danube Region Ukraine, a non-EU country involved in the EU Danube Strategy process, shares significant part of the Danube-Carpathian Region. The Ukrainian part of the Danube Region is formed by four oblasts (regions) – Odessa Oblast, Chernivetska Oblast, Ivano-Frankivska Oblast and Zakarpatska Oblast – occupying 68,100 sq km with a population of 5.9 million. Ukraine and the EUSDR – Attitude • A tool for the sustainable development of the areas belonging to the Ukrainian part of the Danube Region. • A factor able to accelerate Ukraine’s move towards the European integration. Ukraine and the EUSDR – Where we are now? Ukraine has not yet become an active player in the Danube Strategy process: • Doesn’t (co)coordinate any of the 11 priority areas; • At the official level, has not been actively involved in EUSDR key events (PAs’ meetings, annual forums); • Vertical (central government – 4 regions) and horizontal (between the 4 regions) coordination has not yet been ensured; • The poor exchange of information about EUSDR-related activities in which Ukraine is involved. Why? • An effective coordination system of Ukraine’s involvement in the EUSDR implementation has not yet been created. • Political instability – the lack of continuity, especially at the regional level. Ukraine and the EUSDR – Success stories Integrated Tisza River Basin Management Plan (Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Hungary, Ukraine) adopted on 11 April 2011 in Uzhgorod, Ukraine, at the Ministerial Meeting of the Tisza River Basin Countries.
    [Show full text]