DOCSLIB.ORG

Relative Clause Constructions in Turkish Sign Language Dissertation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Relative Clause Constructions in Turkish Sign Language Dissertation Relative Clause Constructions in Turkish Sign Language Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades des Doktors der Philosophie Fachbereiche Sprache, Literatur, Medien I & II der Universität Hamburg vorgelegt von OKAN KUBUS aus Ankara Hamburg, Juni 2016 Hauptgutachter: Prof. Dr. Christian Rathmann Zweitgutachterin: Prof. Dr. Annette Hohenberger Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 30.01.2015 Angenommen von der Fakultät für Geisteswissenschaften der Universität Hamburg am 11.03.2015 Veröffentlicht mit Genehmigung der Fakultät für Geisteswissenschaften der Universität Hamburg am 23.05.2016 ii Türk Sağır topluluğuna To the Turkish Deaf community iii ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the relative clause constructions (RCCs) in Turkish Sign Language (TİD). TİD, a recognized natural language, has rich, distinctive linguistic properties, as do other sign and spoken languages. For the analysis of various relativization strategies and discourse functions of RCCs in TİD, the collected data is based on TİD monologues in a small corpus (consisting of approximately three film hours), which has been annotated with special attention to RCC types in various discourse modes (narrative, information, report and description), with a high incidence of narrative passages. The distributions of head noun position, the positions of relative and matrix clauses, the accompanying nonmanual elements, and the relative elements indicated three strategies: (i) head noun exhibited within the scope of nonmanual, (ii) distinctive nonmanual scopes of head noun and modifying clause, and (iii) non-overt head nouns (free RCs). The data reveal that restrictive RCCs strongly favor circumnominal-like constructions, which are generally accompanied by squint, whereas nonrestrictive RCCs in TİD use a variety of strategies. Even though the way that relative clauses in TİD are marked also show a great distribution, the two strategies that were observed the most frequently are (i) no overt relative marker and (ii) clause-final IX (nominalizer). In order to examine the functions of RCCs in a text, the familiarity status of the head-noun and the accompanying modifying clause of RCCs in the corpus is investigated. According to the findings, several important functions of RCCs are realized. The favored function of RCC is to reintroduce both head noun and modifying clause into the text to either disambiguate the referents or to help the addressee to determine the referent. However, another function of RCCs can also be introducing the head noun with an identifiable modifying clause that has not been introduced into discourse earlier, given that the addressee can infer the identity of the referent using this information (shared information). Keywords: Turkish Sign Language, Relative Clause Constructions, Discourse iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am grateful to Christian Rathmann, my advisor, for his guidance and insight throughout my research, and for guiding me through the entire thesis process from start to finish. Had it not been for his faith in me, I would not have been able to finish the thesis. I am very fortunate to have written my thesis in such an excellent academic milieu as the Institute for German Sign Language at the University of Hamburg. Heartfelt thanks go to Annette Hohenberger for her valuable support and ideas. Thanks also to Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach, Chiara Branchini, Annika Herrmann, Aslı Özyürek, Inge Zwitserlood, Phillippe Schlenker and Trevor Johnston for their academic support and/or for inviting me to colloquia for presenting my thesis and providing invaluable feedback. Thanks as well to Sinan Yıldırım, who has provided me with his insight and comments as a fluent signer of TİD. I appreciate his support, feedback, and most of all, his friendship. This thesis would not be as rich without the help of many Deaf people who participated in the data elicitation tasks and provided their brilliant ideas about TİD: Ercan Çevik, Hayal Yaşam Moran Yıldırım. Special Thanks given to Caitlin Golden who read my dissertation throughout and made useful comments. Thanks given to Dolly Blanck, Konstantin Grin, Kadir Gökgöz, Thora Hübner, Claudia Macht, Derya Nuhbalaoglu, Sedat Özcan, Josefina Safar, Müge Sevinç, Oya Tanyeri, Yasemin Uncu, Agnes Villwock, Mareike Werner and Viktor Werner who were more than very helpful throughout my academic career. I want to take the opportunity to thank Louisa Marie Pethke, Szilárd Rácz- Engelhardt, and Stella von Randow for their special friendship. They were always there for me during the process, whenever I needed advice, or simply to lend an ear. I would not have survived this without their words of encouragement. Last but not least, I offer my heart-felt thanks to my family: My grandparents Melahat and Süleyman Karayeğen for their effort in my social and intellectual development since my birth; my mother Zuhal Çokünal and my aunts, Nuray and Ayşe Karayeğen, who supported me both emotionally and financially. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................ iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................ v TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................ vi LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................... ix LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................ xii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................. 1 1.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Objectives and Rationale of the Present Research .................................................... 3 1.3. Original Contributions and the Significance of the Thesis ....................................... 4 1.4. Organization of the Dissertation ............................................................................... 5 CHAPTER 2: INTRODUCTION to TURKISH SIGN LANGUAGE and the TURKISH DEAF COMMUNITY ........................................................................... 6 2.1. Historical, Sociolinguistic, and Political Aspects of TİD ......................................... 7 2.2. Grammatical Sketch of TİD .................................................................................... 10 2.2.1. The TİD Manual Alphabet ............................................................................... 11 2.2.2. Phonology and Phonetics of TİD ..................................................................... 12 2.2.3. Morphology of TİD .......................................................................................... 17 2.2.4 Lexicon of TİD ................................................................................................. 37 2.2.5 Syntax of TİD ................................................................................................... 41 2.2.6. The Spatial Domain in TİD .............................................................................. 69 2.3. Summary ................................................................................................................. 75 CHAPTER 3: RELATIVE CLAUSE CONSTRUCTIONS: LANGUAGE TYPOLOGY ........................................................................................................... 77 3.1. Typology of RCs ..................................................................................................... 79 3.1.1. Syntactic Typology of RCs .............................................................................. 81 3.1.2. Semantic Typology of RCs .............................................................................. 91 3.1.3. The Treatment of NPrel ................................................................................... 100 3.2. RCCs in the Discourse Representation Theory (DRT, Kamp & Reyle 1993) Framework ................................................................................................................... 108 3.3. RCCs in Sign Languages ....................................................................................... 113 3.3.1. RCCs in American Sign Language ................................................................ 114 3.3.2. RCCs in German Sign Language ................................................................... 121 3.3.3. RCCs in Italian Sign Language ...................................................................... 124 3.3.4. RCCs in Other Sign Languages ..................................................................... 139 3.3.5. Cross-Linguistic Variation of Relativization in Sign Languages .................. 145 3.4. Summary ............................................................................................................... 149 CHAPTER 4: METHODOLOGY ........................................................................ 152 4.1. Data Collection ...................................................................................................... 152 4.2. Data Annotation .................................................................................................... 153 4.2.1. Tier Construction ........................................................................................... 154 4.2.2. The Process of Annotation and the Top-Down Approach ............................. 156 4.3. Research Questions ..............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sign Language Typology Series
    SIGN LANGUAGE TYPOLOGY SERIES The Sign Language Typology Series is dedicated to the comparative study of sign languages around the world. Individual or collective works that systematically explore typological variation across sign languages are the focus of this series, with particular emphasis on undocumented, underdescribed and endangered sign languages. The scope of the series primarily includes cross-linguistic studies of grammatical domains across a larger or smaller sample of sign languages, but also encompasses the study of individual sign languages from a typological perspective and comparison between signed and spoken languages in terms of language modality, as well as theoretical and methodological contributions to sign language typology. Interrogative and Negative Constructions in Sign Languages Edited by Ulrike Zeshan Sign Language Typology Series No. 1 / Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages / Ulrike Zeshan (ed.) / Nijmegen: Ishara Press 2006. ISBN-10: 90-8656-001-6 ISBN-13: 978-90-8656-001-1 © Ishara Press Stichting DEF Wundtlaan 1 6525XD Nijmegen The Netherlands Fax: +31-24-3521213 email: [email protected] http://ishara.def-intl.org Cover design: Sibaji Panda Printed in the Netherlands First published 2006 Catalogue copy of this book available at Depot van Nederlandse Publicaties, Koninklijke Bibliotheek, Den Haag (www.kb.nl/depot) To the deaf pioneers in developing countries who have inspired all my work Contents Preface........................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Sign Language Endangerment and Linguistic Diversity Ben Braithwaite
    RESEARCH REPORT Sign language endangerment and linguistic diversity Ben Braithwaite University of the West Indies at St. Augustine It has become increasingly clear that current threats to global linguistic diversity are not re - stricted to the loss of spoken languages. Signed languages are vulnerable to familiar patterns of language shift and the global spread of a few influential languages. But the ecologies of signed languages are also affected by genetics, social attitudes toward deafness, educational and public health policies, and a widespread modality chauvinism that views spoken languages as inherently superior or more desirable. This research report reviews what is known about sign language vi - tality and endangerment globally, and considers the responses from communities, governments, and linguists. It is striking how little attention has been paid to sign language vitality, endangerment, and re - vitalization, even as research on signed languages has occupied an increasingly prominent posi - tion in linguistic theory. It is time for linguists from a broader range of backgrounds to consider the causes, consequences, and appropriate responses to current threats to sign language diversity. In doing so, we must articulate more clearly the value of this diversity to the field of linguistics and the responsibilities the field has toward preserving it.* Keywords : language endangerment, language vitality, language documentation, signed languages 1. Introduction. Concerns about sign language endangerment are not new. Almost immediately after the invention of film, the US National Association of the Deaf began producing films to capture American Sign Language (ASL), motivated by a fear within the deaf community that their language was endangered (Schuchman 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • 15Th November 2015.Indd
    NUMBER : 1008 THE SCINDIA SCHOOL, FORT GWALIOR EVIEW-15 EST. 1897 SUNDAY, 15 NOVEMBERER 20152015 | WPPWPP : REGN.NO.GWL.DN.11 Mr Vishesh Sahai Dear Readers, a spellbinding, thought provoking speech which had innumerable messages – each embellished with anecdotes and personal experiences. This was Diwali Greetings to all of you. followed by an exciting on-stage conversation between the students and the Chief Guest. The prestigious ‘Madhav Award’ for Old Boy of eminence was The auspicious festival of lights was celebrated with gusto and gaiety all over conferred upon Professor Gautam Barua. Finally, the ceremony symbolizing the country and on the Fort as well. Many children who stayed on campus the handing over of the traditions of the school by the Madhav Awardee to for one reason or the other during Diwali vacations were ensured a cracking the youngest Scindian was performed. Prof Gautam Barua read out the Diwali by the school, which took it upon itself to make merry for them. Boys message and handed over the lamp with the replica of the school lag to Ansh went for an outing down the Fort and then to Orchha, and a menu was specially Raj. It was an emotional moment for students, faculty and the parents. The innovated by the mess staff to suit their palates and the festivities. evening culminated with a memorable ballet, beautifully choreographed and performed, entitled – ‘Mrignayani’. On the 21st of October we commemorated our 118th Founder’s Day with great enthusiasm, zest and pomp and show. One more milestone was added It was indeed a beitting celebration, establishing the fact that we are all stars in our journey from our humble beginnings to its eminent stature today.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Choice and Identity: an Investigation Based on the Comparison of Language Attitudes from Two Different Localities
    Available online at www.jlls.org JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTIC STUDIES ISSN: 1305-578X Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(2), 1032-1042; 2020 Language choice and identity: An investigation based on the comparison of language attitudes from two different localities Filiz Çetintaş Yıldırıma 1 a Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey APA Citation: Çetintaş Yıldırım, F. (2020). The Language Choice and Identity: An Investigation Based on the Comparison of Language Attitudes from Two Different Localities. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(2), 1032-1042.Doi: 10.17263/jlls.759361 Submission Date:14/02/2020 Acceptance Date:18/03/2020 Abstract This current research tries to compare and contrast the language attitudes of Arabic-Turkish bilinguals from Mersin and Hatay cities located in the East Mediterranean Region of Anatolia. The quantitative results of the language attitude surveys conducted in the two cities by two different researchers (Çetintaş Yıldırım, 2019; Kocaoğlu, 2019) are compared, and qualitative conclusions which can be generalized to the population of Arabic-Turkish bilinguals are obtained. Two different but related themes (language choices and the sense of belonging to a social/cultural identity of the two participant groups) consist of the main focus. Four sets of questions for the identity theme and seven sets of questions for the language choice theme were determined from the surveys and the means of each group for every question were compared and interpreted. The comparison reveals that Arabic-Turkish bilinguals from Hatay interiorize Arabic language more than Arabic-Turkish bilinguals from Mersin. The first group is more inclined to use Arabic in their professional career and transfer it to the new generations.
    [Show full text]
  • ECFG-Turkey-2021R.Pdf
    About this Guide This guide is designed to prepare you to deploy to culturally complex environments and achieve mission objectives. The fundamental information contained within will help you understand the cultural dimension of your assigned location and gain skills necessary for success (Photo: A US Senior Airman at a fruit stand in Adana). ECFG The guide consists of 2 parts: Part 1 is the “Culture General” section, which provides the foundational Turkey knowledge you need to operate effectively in any global environment. Part 2 is the “Culture Specific” section, which describes unique cultural features of Turkish society. It applies culture-general concepts to help increase your knowledge of your assigned deployment location. This section is designed to complement other pre-deployment training (Photo: Former President Obama meets with Turkish President Erdoğan). For further information, visit the Air Force Culture and Language Center (AFCLC) website at www.airuniversity.af.edu/AFCLC/ or contact the AFCLC Region Team at [email protected]. Disclaimer: All text is the property of the AFCLC and may not be modified by a change in title, content, or labeling. It may be reproduced in its current format with the express permission of the AFCLC. All photography is provided as a courtesy of the US government, Wikimedia, and other sources. GENERAL CULTURE PART 1 – CULTURE GENERAL What is Culture? Fundamental to all aspects of human existence, culture shapes the way humans view life and functions as a tool we use to adapt to our social and physical environments. A culture is the sum of all of the beliefs, values, behaviors, and symbols that have meaning for a society.
    [Show full text]
  • Negation in Kata Kolok Grammaticalization Throughout Three Generations of Signers
    UNIVERSITEIT VAN AMSTERDAM Graduate School for Humanities Negation in Kata Kolok Grammaticalization throughout three generations of signers Master’s Thesis Hannah Lutzenberger Student number: 10852875 Supervised by: Dr. Roland Pfau Dr. Vadim Kimmelman Dr. Connie de Vos Amsterdam 2017 Abstract (250 words) Although all natural languages have ways of expressing negation, the linguistic realization is subject to typological variation (Dahl 2010; Payne 1985). Signed languages combine manual signs and non-manual elements. This leads to an intriguing dichotomy: While non-manual marker(s) alone are sufficient for negating a proposition in some signed languages (non- manual dominant system), the use of a negative manual sign is required in others (manual dominant system) (Zeshan 2004, 2006). Kata Kolok (KK), a young signing variety used in a Balinese village with a high incidence of congenital deafness (de Vos 2012; Winata et al. 1995), had previously been classified as an extreme example of the latter type: the manual sign NEG functions as the main negator and a negative headshake remains largely unused (Marsaja 2008). Adopting a corpus-based approach, the present study reevaluates this claim. The analysis of intergenerational data of six deaf native KK signers from the KK Corpus (de Vos 2016) reveals that the classification of KK negation is not as straightforward as formerly suggested. Although KK signers make extensive use of NEG, a negative headshake is widespread as well. Furthermore, signers from different generations show disparate tendencies in the use of specific markers. Specifically, the involvement of the manual negator slightly increases over time, and the headshake begins to spread within the youngest generation of signers.
    [Show full text]
  • Typology of Signed Languages: Differentiation Through Kinship Terminology Erin Wilkinson
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of New Mexico University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Linguistics ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 7-1-2009 Typology of Signed Languages: Differentiation through Kinship Terminology Erin Wilkinson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ling_etds Recommended Citation Wilkinson, Erin. "Typology of Signed Languages: Differentiation through Kinship Terminology." (2009). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ling_etds/40 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Linguistics ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TYPOLOGY OF SIGNED LANGUAGES: DIFFERENTIATION THROUGH KINSHIP TERMINOLOGY BY ERIN LAINE WILKINSON B.A., Language Studies, Wellesley College, 1999 M.A., Linguistics, Gallaudet University, 2001 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Linguistics The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico August, 2009 ©2009, Erin Laine Wilkinson ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iii DEDICATION To my mother iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many thanks to Barbara Pennacchi for kick starting me on my dissertation by giving me a room at her house, cooking me dinner, and making Italian coffee in Rome during November 2007. Your endless support, patience, and thoughtful discussions are gratefully taken into my heart, and I truly appreciate what you have done for me. I heartily acknowledge Dr. William Croft, my advisor, for continuing to encourage me through the long number of months writing and rewriting these chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Report
    “Boosting Adult System Education In Agriculture” AGRI BASE Erasmus+ KA2 Strategic Partnerships Baseline report SYSTEM OF ADULT EDUCATION AND TRAINING in the Field of Agriculture 2016 SYSTEM OF ADULT EDUCATION AND TRAINING in the Field of Agriculture AGRI BASE This document was created within the Erasmus+ project "Boosting Adult System Education In Agriculture" AgriBase Ref. No. 2015-1-MK01-KA204-002857 O1 leading institution:University of East Sarajevo, BH AgriBase participating institutions: OCULL „Vanco Prke“-R Macedonia, University of East Sarajevo-BH,University of Foggia-Italy, Polytechnic University of Cartagena-Spain, NGO Webin- R Serbia, College Iliria-Kosovo, University 1 Dec.1918 Alba Iulia- Romania, Technical University of Varna- Bulgaria, Estonian University of Life Sciences-Estonia, Cukurova University- Turkey Contributors: Dimitrova M, Mitasev G, Petrov T, Kulina M, Vukojevic D, Radovic M, Stasi A, Conte A, Beneduce L, Amodio ML, Acosta JA, Martinez S, Gomez- Lopez LD, Zornoza R, Stojanovic M, Reci A, Levente G, Iordacescu D, Drumeva M, Yankov P, Laikoja K, Tamm M, Cetin M Editor: Grujica Vico English lecture: Marijana Dimitrova CIP - Каталогизација во публикација Национална и универзитетска библиотека "Св. Климент Охридски", Скопје 37:63(062) COMPARATIVE baseline report on adult education in agriculture / [editor Grujica Vico]. - Stip : NI National library "Goce Delčev", 2016. - 231 стр. : илустр. ; 21 см Текст на повеќе јазици ISBN 978-608-242-026-4 а) Едукација на возрасни - Земјоделство - Зборници COBISS.MK-ID 101019402
    [Show full text]
  • Men's Boxers Profiles
    AIBA Youth Women’s & Men’s World Boxing Championships BUDAPEST 2018 Men’s Boxers Profiles 49KG – FARIS DJABALLAH – ALGERIA (ALG) Date Of Birth : 19/04/2001 Club : AMEL 2018 – AFBC African Confederation Youth Boxing Championships (Casablanca, MAR) 2nd place – 49KG Lost to Alayu Mekonnen (ETH) 5:0 in the final; Won against Marcial Wouang (CMR) 4:1 in the semi-final; Won against John Fisher Odoch (UGA) 5:0 in the quarter-final 2018 – Emil Zhechev Youth Memorial Tournament (Sofia, BUL) 3rd place – 49KG Lost to Ergyunal Sebahtin Sabri (BUL) 3:2 in the semi-final 2017 – Algerian Junior National Cup 1st place – 46KG Won against Ahmed Bouchena (ALG) 5:0 in the final; Won against Aymene Douibeta (ALG) 5:0 in the semi-final 2017 – Algerian Junior National Championships 3rd place – 46KG Lost to Azzedine Tartoura (ALG) 3:2 in the semi-final 49KG – SEYRAN YEGHIKYAN – ARMENIA (ARM) Date Of Birth : 31/01/2001 Place Of Birth : Shirak Region Height : 162cm Coach : Garik Baghdasaryan Club : Shirak HMM Residence : Saratak Stance : Orthodox His most influential person : His father Boxing idol : Karo Murad Hobby : Recipes Number of training hours : 9 in a week Number of bouts : 52 Began boxing : 2014 2018 – EUBC European Confederation Youth Boxing Championships (Roseto degli Abruzzi, ITA) 7th place – 49KG Lost to Jude Gallagher (IRL) 5:0 in the quarter-final; Won against Ergyunal Sabri (BUL) 4:1 in the second preliminary round; Won against Aleks Karamani (SRB) 4:1 in the first preliminary round 2018 – Armenian Youth National Championships 1st place – 49KG
    [Show full text]
  • Download, Modify and Append It As They See fit
    UC Berkeley Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society Title The Cross-linguistic Distribution of Sign Language Parameters Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1kz4f6q7 Journal Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 41(41) ISSN 2377-1666 Author Tatman, Rachael Publication Date 2015 DOI 10.20354/B4414110002 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California PROCEEDINGS OF THE FORTY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING OF THE BERKELEY LINGUISTICS SOCIETY February 7-8, 2015 General Session Special Session Fieldwork Methodology Editors Anna E. Jurgensen Hannah Sande Spencer Lamoureux Kenny Baclawski Alison Zerbe Berkeley Linguistics Society Berkeley, CA, USA Berkeley Linguistics Society University of California, Berkeley Department of Linguistics 1203 Dwinelle Hall Berkeley, CA 94720-2650 USA All papers copyright c 2015 by the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Inc. All rights reserved. ISSN: 0363-2946 LCCN: 76-640143 Contents Acknowledgments . v Foreword . vii The No Blur Principle Effects as an Emergent Property of Language Systems Farrell Ackerman, Robert Malouf . 1 Intensification and sociolinguistic variation: a corpus study Andrea Beltrama . 15 Tagalog Sluicing Revisited Lena Borise . 31 Phonological Opacity in Pendau: a Local Constraint Conjunction Analysis Yan Chen . 49 Proximal Demonstratives in Predicate NPs Ryan B . Doran, Gregory Ward . 61 Syntax of generic null objects revisited Vera Dvořák . 71 Non-canonical Noun Incorporation in Bzhedug Adyghe Ksenia Ershova . 99 Perceptual distribution of merging phonemes Valerie Freeman . 121 Second Position and “Floating” Clitics in Wakhi Zuzanna Fuchs . 133 Some causative alternations in K’iche’, and a unified syntactic derivation John Gluckman . 155 The ‘Whole’ Story of Partitive Quantification Kristen A .
    [Show full text]
  • Verb Agreement in Brazilian Sign Language: Morphophonology, Syntax & Semantics
    Guilherme Lourenço Verb agreement in Brazilian Sign Language: Morphophonology, Syntax & Semantics Belo Horizonte Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais 2018 Guilherme Lourenço Verb agreement in Brazilian Sign Language: Morphophonology, Syntax & Semantics Doctoral dissertation submitted to the Post- Graduate Program in Linguistic Studies (Poslin) at the Federal University of Minas Gerais, as a requisite to obtain the title of Doctor in Linguistics. Area: Theoretical and Descriptive Linguistics Research line: Studies on Formal Syntax Adviser: Dr. Fábio Bonfim Duarte Co-adviser: Dr. Ronnie B. Wilbur Belo Horizonte Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais 2018 Ficha catalográfica elaborada pelos Bibliotecários da Biblioteca FALE/UFMG Lourenço, Guilherme. L892v Verb agreement in Brazilian Sign Language [manuscrito] : Morphophonology, Syntax & Semantics / Guilherme Lourenço. – 2018. 320 f., enc. Orientador: Fábio Bonfim Duarte. Coorientador: Ronnie B. Wilbur Área de concentração: Linguística Teórica e Descritiva. Linha de Pesquisa: Estudos em Sintaxe Formal. Tese (doutorado) – Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Faculdade de Letras. Bibliografia: f. 266-286. Apêndices: f. 287-320. 1. Língua brasileira de sinais – Sintaxe – Teses. 2. Língua brasileira de sinais – Concordância – Teses. 3. Língua brasileira de sinais – Gramática – Teses. 4. Língua brasileira de sinais – Verbos – Teses. I. Duarte, Fábio Bonfim. II. Wilbur, Ronnie B. III. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Faculdade de Letras. IV. Título. CDD: 419 VERB AGREEMENT IN BRAZILIAN SIGN
    [Show full text]
  • The Kata Kolok Corpus: Documenting a Shared Sign Language
    accepted for Sign Language Studies, 16 (2), Winter 2016 Sampling shared sign languages Connie de Vos Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmgen, the Netherlands Abstract This paper addresses some of the theoretical questions, ethical considerations, and methodological decisions that underlie the creation of the Kata Kolok Corpus as well as the Kata Kolok Child Signing Corpus. This discussion is relevant to the formation of prospective sign corpora that aim to capture the various sociolinguistic landscapes in which sign languages, whether rural or urban, may emerge and evolve. Keywords: corpus construction, shared sign languages, linguistic fieldwork, first language acquisition, Kata Kolok 1. Introduction1 Whether stated or implied, the emergence of sign languages has often taken to be directly linked to the establishment of formal deaf education, and other cultural centres where deaf individuals may convene. Over the past ten years, more attention has been given to the emergence of signing varieties in rural and urban areas with a high incidence of deafness, where both deaf and hearing community members form social networks, using visual-gestural forms of communication (Nyst 2012). This latter sociolinguistic category of sign language, being used by both deaf and hearing community members, is known as a shared sign language. Shared signing communities vary in detail with respect to various social factors such as the causes and incidence of deafness, community size, the ratio of deaf and hearing signers, time depth, as well as the socio-cultural construction of deafness (Kisch 2008; Kusters 2010). The linguistic and anthropological documentation and description of shared signing communities are still in their initial stages (Zeshan & de Vos 2012).
    [Show full text]