Cornell Law Review Volume 77 Article 3 Issue 4 May 1992 Pluralizing the Client-Lawyer Relationship John Leubsdorf Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation John Leubsdorf, Pluralizing the Client-Lawyer Relationship , 77 Cornell L. Rev. 825 (1992) Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol77/iss4/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. PLURALIZING THE CLIENT-LAWYER RELATIONSHIP John Leubsdorf t The lawyer-client relationship traditionally has been conceived as one between individuals. Indeed, this conception is built into the very words we use to describe the relationship. Scholarship, profes- sional rules, and judicial opinions speak of "a lawyer" and "a client."' In reality, legal services today are usually rendered by groups of people for other groups of people, or perhaps by organizations for other organizations. Lawyers increasingly practice in firms, legal service or government offices, and other groupings.2 Clients are typically businesses, government agencies, or other organizations. This Article is a preliminary attempt to explore the implications of these realities for the law governing client-lawyer relationships. In particular, I suggest some alternative conceptions of these rela- tionships. Though scholars have considered some of the problems discussed, the subject as a whole is novel: how to apply a body of law, presupposing relationships between individual clients and law- yers, when the group nature of clients or lawyers is important.