DOCSLIB.ORG

And Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FY 2006 SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST FOR OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM (OIF) AND OPERATION ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF) February 2006 Table of Contents Summary Requirements by Title …………………………………………………………1 Detailed Justification by Appropriation Chapter I. Military Personnel, Operation and Maintenance and Revolving Funds …………………………………………………3 A. Military Personnel B. Operation and Maintenance C. Revolving and Management Funds Chapter II. Modularity, Procurement, and Research and Development……...14 A. Army Modularity and Marine Corps Force Structure Initiative B. Procurement and Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E) Chapter III. Support to Iraq/Afghanistan and Other Coalition Partners……....59 A. Support to Allies and Coalition Partners · Iraq and Afghan Security Forces · Support for Coalition Partners · Other Support B. Other Incremental Costs Chapter IV. Military Construction and Classified………………………………65 A. Military Construction B. Classified i Department of Defense FY 2006 Supplemental Request Summary of Requirements The Department requests $67.9 billion, of which $65.3 billion is available for the Department of Defense, in FY 2006 to respond to the demands of ongoing military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, while carrying on its daily operations around the globe, and to fund other critical requirements. This funding will finance the incremental costs above the peacetime budget that are necessary to sustain the Department’s commitment of time and resources to combat terrorism worldwide. The summary displays the supplemental request in six major cost categories: Summary of Requirements by Title Military Personnel and Operation and Maintenance: The Department requests $42.4 billion to support continuing military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. This supplemental funding is critical for stabilization and security operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and other operations in support of the GWOT. In addition, operation of the theater consolidation shipping point is funded in this request for war reserve inventories, prepositioned stocks, and inventory augmentation to support deploying troops and ongoing operations. Further, the Department requests $0.5 billion for revolving fund financed activities. Procurement and Research and Development: The Department requests $17.2 billion to finance the procurement of critical equipment and for Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) programs, including some classified programs, in support of OIF and OEF. Other Activities: The Department requests $7.8 billion to fund other activities to include - the Iraq and Afghanistan Security Forces Funds ($5.9 billion); urgent military construction projects ($0.5 billion) and classified and other programs. 1 Department of Defense FY 2006 Supplemental Request Summary of FY 2006 Supplemental Request by Appropriation ($M) Military Operation and Proc. & Military Personnel Maintenance RDT&E Construction WCF Other Total Iraq Freedom Fund (IFF) - 100.0 100.000 Afghanistan Security Forces Fund 2,197.8 2,197.8 Iraq Security Forces Fund 3,703.0 3,703.0 Military Personnel, Army 6,506.2 6,506.2 Military Personnel, Navy 761.7 761.7 Military Personnel, Marine Corps 834.1 834.1 Military Personnel, Air Force 1,145.4 1,145.4 Reserve Personnel, Army 126.1 126.1 Reserve Personnel, Navy 110.4 110.4 Reserve Personnel, MC 10.3 10.3 Reserve Personnel, Air Force 1.9 1.9 National Guard Personnel, Army 96.0 96.0 National Guard Personnel, Air Force 1.2 1.2 O&M, Army 18,050.3 18,050.3 O&M, Navy 2,793.6 2,793.6 O&M, Marine Corps 1,622.9 1,622.9 O&M, Air Force 6,088.2 6,088.2 O&M, Army Reserve 100.1 100.1 O&M, Navy Reserve 236.5 236.5 O&M, Marine Corps Reserve 55.6 55.6 O&M, Army National Guard 178.6 178.6 O&M, Air Force Reserve 18.6 18.6 O&M, Air National Guard 30.4 30.4 O&M, Defense-Wide 3,559.9 3,559.9 O&M, Inspector General 1.1 1.1 Drug Interdiction & Counter-Drug 192.8 192.8 Defense Health Program 1,153.6 1,153.6 Aircraft Procurement, Army 533.2 533.2 Aircraft Procurement, Navy 271.3 271.3 Aircraft Procurement, Air Force 389.9 389.9 Procurement, Marine Corps 2,900.6 2,900.6 Procurement, Defense-Wide 331.4 331.4 Procurement of Ammo, Army 829.6 829.6 Procurement of Ammo, AF 29.0 29.0 Procurement of Ammo, Navy & MC 331.0 331.0 Other Procurement, Army 7,663.7 7,663.7 Other Procurement, Navy 168.0 168.0 Other Procurement, Air Force 1,517.0 1,517.0 Missile Procurement, Army 203.3 203.3 Weapons Procurement, Navy 95.9 95.9 Proc of Weapons & Tracked Combt Vehicles, Army 1,133.3 1,133.3 RDT&E, Army 429.0 429.0 RDT&E, Navy 140.0 140.0 RDT&E, Air Force 67.1 67.1 RDT&E, Defense-Wide 145.9 145.9 Defense Working Capital Fund 516.7 516.7 Military Construction, Army 413.4 413.4 Military Construction, Defense-Wide 35.2 35.2 Military Construction, Air Force 36.1 36.1 Total 9,593.3 32,735.8 17,179.2 484.7 516.7 7,347.2 67,856.9 * May not add due to rounding includes funds for National Intelligence Program. 2 Department of Defense FY 2006 Supplemental Request CHAPTER 1 MILITARY PERSONNEL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REVOLVING AND MANAGEMENT FUNDS Detailed Justification The FY 2006 emergency supplemental requests funds so that the United States may continue its security stabilization efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan and the fight against terrorism in other locations. The supplemental request includes $9.6 billion for Military Personnel requirements and $32.7 billion for Operation and Maintenance. The global war on terror deployments are in addition to the usual daily military operations around the globe. Without additional funds in FY 2006, the Components would have to use funds from their readiness and investment accounts to finance the continuing costs of military operations. In FY 2005, military personnel and operation and maintenance costs averaged about $4.5 billion per month for OIF and $0.8 billion per month for OEF. Absorbing costs of this magnitude would seriously degrade combat operations and would weaken the nation’s ability to react to future threats. Military operations costs include the military pays associated with mobilizing Guard and Reserve forces as well as special pays for deployed service members. It also includes the broad functions financed by the Operation and Maintenance costs supporting day-to-day operations in theater. These range from the operation of base camps (dining facilities, laundry, and housing) to flying hours, steaming days, supplies and maintenance. The supplemental request assumes an average monthly deployment of about 138,000 troops in Iraq and 18,000 troops in Afghanistan with short term increases in the in-country end strength during troop rotation transition. 3 Department of Defense FY 2006 Supplemental Request MILITARY PERSONNEL PERSONNEL COSTS This supplemental request totals $9.6 billion for military personnel pay. This request is net of the funds received in Title IX of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2006 and finances the incremental pay, special pay, and entitlements above the normal monthly personnel compensation costs for military personnel participating in or directly supporting ongoing military operations. It also includes the costs to pay additional military personnel maintained on active duty above the normal end strength levels to sustain the readiness levels of deploying units. The following table provides a breakout of the supplemental requirement for military personnel costs: Incremental Pay and Allowances for Mobilized/Deployed Personnel:* (Dollars in Millions) Marine Air Army Navy Corps Force Total *** Active Forces 1,062.4 156.3 75.6 109.0 1,403.3 Reserve Forces: Reserves 1,524.6 407.3 229.2 393.4 2,554.6 National Guard 2,670.4 - - 336.3 3,006.7 Total Incremental P&A 5,257.5 563.6 304.8 838.7 6,964.6 Over Strength 380.2 273.0 653.2 Pre and Post Mobilization Training 63.0 73.3 - 136.3 Recruiting & Retention 305.1 1.6 34.4 341.1 Increased Foreign Language Proficiency Pay 33.7 10.6 3.7 11.2 59.2 Death Gratuities 202.0 117.6 45.2 178.6 543.5 SGLI Extra Hazard Payments ** 183.2 82.9 39.2 94.6 400.0 Traumatic Injury Protection Extra Hazard Pmts 288.4 21.5 141.3 22.4 473.5 Insurance Premiums for OIF/OEF Personnel 15.2 1.0 2.8 3.0 22.0 Total Military Personnel 6,728.3 872.1 844.4 1,148.5 9,593.4 * Totals may not add due to rounding. ** Servicemembers Group Life Insurance (SGLI) claims in excess of projected peacetime level. *** Does not include the Coast Guard requirement of $26 million for death gratuity payments. Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH): The following amounts are included in the $9.6 billion request above for incremental pay and allowances for mobilized/deployed personnel, over strength, and pre and post mobilization training: 4 Department of Defense FY 2006 Supplemental Request MEMO ENTRY COSTS FOR BAH (Dollars in Millions) Marine Air Army Navy Corps Force Total Active Forces (193.0) (27.1) (21.8) (9.7) (251.6) Reserve Forces: Reserves (231.2) (96.4) (64.7) (66.4) (458.7) National Guard (419.4) - - (55.0) (474.4) Total Incremental BAH (843.6) (123.5) (86.5) (131.1) (1,184.7) In response to the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, the President invoked his authority (10 U.S.C 12302) to order to active duty Ready Reserve members and delegated his authority to the Secretary of Defense in Proclamation 7463 of September 14, 2001.
Recommended publications
  • The Star Fort, September, 1814

    The Star Fort, September, 1814

    D-JLJ- UNITED STATES DEPARTHEI'irrr OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE FORT MCHENRY NATIONAL MONUMENT AND HISTORIC SHRINE BALTIMORE 30, MARYLAND \\St ARtftlOlOGY The .Star Fort, September, 1814 Prepared by: Dr. W. Richard Walsh Contract Historian · Georgetown University Georgetown, D.C. November, 1958 r~ , .. I . ,. .. - •• '' I• ,•' --:• ' . '·· ~ -,, .. ., . · .· .. :· .·. • , :: .:'~ .: :/ F.1 _r1 .. .J '~ l. \ '. \~ IJ li :i. /:i1('fl ---. \J .. •• 1 : ... .. .. .. ,,.. - l ~ j Table of Contents Page Frontispiece ••••••••••••••• • • • • ii I. Introduction • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 II. The Star Fort, September 12-14, 1814 • • • • • • • 7 24 III. Conclusions. • • • • • • • • • • • • 3 • • • • • • ._: I f ,\ .. i ) ~ ',...___/ Errata p .. 2, line 60 '0 indiaten should read '0 indicate.io p. 3, line 4o "war-fare" should read 10 warfareo 18 p. a, line 8. "amatuer" should read "amateur.~ p .. 7, fn. 1, line 5. "principle" should read ~principal." p. 9, line 12. "wa.tteries" should read "batteries. ~ p. 10, · line 10. Delete "which." p .. 10, line 11. "patforms" should read "platforms." p. 10, line 17. "Descius" should read "Decius." p. 13, fn. \:1 9 line 5. "Jessup" should read "Jesupn in this and all subsequent mention of the name. o. 19, line 16~ "orciinarilly" should read "ordinarily .. '° p. 26, line 5. "Carrol" should read "Carroll." p. 26, line 7. "confederates" should read "Confederates." .a- -. ( ... ~ "'·. / I Introduction In 1776, Baltimore prepared itself for. attack by the British~ Already apprehensive because of threats from the sea by His Majesty's vessel, the Otter, the Committee of Safety choose Whetstone Point as the best fortifiable site against enemy destruction to the Baltimore harbor. A fort of sorts was therefore erected, but because the threat of a general naval attack never materialized and the actual fight­ ing of the war of the Revolution by-passed Baltimoreans, a well armed Fort vVhetstone was not accomplished.
  • The Real Outcome of the Iraq War: US and Iranian Strategic Competition in Iraq

    The Real Outcome of the Iraq War: US and Iranian Strategic Competition in Iraq

    The Real Outcome of the Iraq War: US and Iranian Strategic Competition in Iraq By Anthony H. Cordesman, Peter Alsis, Adam Mausner, and Charles Loi Anthony H. Cordesman Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy Revised: December 20, 2011 Note: This draft is being circulated for comments and suggestions. Please provide them to [email protected] Chapter 6: US Strategic Competition with Iran: Competition in Iraq 2 Executive Summary "Americans planted a tree in Iraq. They watered that tree, pruned it, and cared for it. Ask your American friends why they're leaving now before the tree bears fruit." --Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.1 Iraq has become a key focus of the strategic competition between the United States and Iran. The history of this competition has been shaped by the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988), the 1991 Gulf War, and the US invasion of Iraq in 2003. Since the 2003 war, both the US and Iran have competed to shape the structure of Post-Saddam Iraq’s politics, governance, economics, and security. The US has gone to great lengths to counter Iranian influence in Iraq, including using its status as an occupying power and Iraq’s main source of aid, as well as through information operations and more traditional press statements highlighting Iranian meddling. However, containing Iranian influence, while important, is not America’s main goal in Iraq. It is rather to create a stable democratic Iraq that can defeat the remaining extremist and insurgent elements, defend against foreign threats, sustain an able civil society, and emerge as a stable power friendly to the US and its Gulf allies.
  • Fortification Renaissance: the Roman Origins of the Trace Italienne

    Fortification Renaissance: the Roman Origins of the Trace Italienne

    FORTIFICATION RENAISSANCE: THE ROMAN ORIGINS OF THE TRACE ITALIENNE Robert T. Vigus Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2013 APPROVED: Guy Chet, Committee Co-Chair Christopher Fuhrmann, Committee Co-Chair Walter Roberts, Committee Member Richard B. McCaslin, Chair of the Department of History Mark Wardell, Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Vigus, Robert T. Fortification Renaissance: The Roman Origins of the Trace Italienne. Master of Arts (History), May 2013, pp.71, 35 illustrations, bibliography, 67 titles. The Military Revolution thesis posited by Michael Roberts and expanded upon by Geoffrey Parker places the trace italienne style of fortification of the early modern period as something that is a novel creation, borne out of the minds of Renaissance geniuses. Research shows, however, that the key component of the trace italienne, the angled bastion, has its roots in Greek and Roman writing, and in extant constructions by Roman and Byzantine engineers. The angled bastion of the trace italienne was yet another aspect of the resurgent Greek and Roman culture characteristic of the Renaissance along with the traditions of medicine, mathematics, and science. The writings of the ancients were bolstered by physical examples located in important trading and pilgrimage routes. Furthermore, the geometric layout of the trace italienne stems from Ottoman fortifications that preceded it by at least two hundred years. The Renaissance geniuses combined ancient bastion designs with eastern geometry to match a burgeoning threat in the rising power of the siege cannon. Copyright 2013 by Robert T. Vigus ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not have been possible without the assistance and encouragement of many people.
  • Iraq: U.S. Regime Change Efforts and Post-Saddam Governance

    Iraq: U.S. Regime Change Efforts and Post-Saddam Governance

    Order Code RL31339 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Iraq: U.S. Regime Change Efforts and Post-Saddam Governance Updated May 16, 2005 Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Iraq: U.S. Regime Change Efforts and Post-Saddam Governance Summary Operation Iraqi Freedom accomplished a long-standing U.S. objective, the overthrow of Saddam Hussein, but replacing his regime with a stable, moderate, democratic political structure has been complicated by a persistent Sunni Arab-led insurgency. The Bush Administration asserts that establishing democracy in Iraq will catalyze the promotion of democracy throughout the Middle East. The desired outcome would also likely prevent Iraq from becoming a sanctuary for terrorists, a key recommendation of the 9/11 Commission report. The Bush Administration asserts that U.S. policy in Iraq is now showing substantial success, demonstrated by January 30, 2005 elections that chose a National Assembly, and progress in building Iraq’s various security forces. The Administration says it expects that the current transition roadmap — including votes on a permanent constitution by October 31, 2005 and for a permanent government by December 15, 2005 — are being implemented. Others believe the insurgency is widespread, as shown by its recent attacks, and that the Iraqi government could not stand on its own were U.S. and allied international forces to withdraw from Iraq. Some U.S. commanders and senior intelligence officials say that some Islamic militants have entered Iraq since Saddam Hussein fell, to fight what they see as a new “jihad” (Islamic war) against the United States.
  • Iraqi War Fighting Capabilities: a Dynamic Net Assessment

    Iraqi War Fighting Capabilities: a Dynamic Net Assessment

    CSIS_______________________________ Center for Strategic and International Studies 1800 K Street N.W. Washington, DC 20006 (202) 775-3270 (To comment: [email protected] For Updates see CSIS.ORG, “Military Balance”) Iraqi War Fighting Capabilities: A Dynamic Net Assessment Anthony H. Cordesman Arleigh A. Burke Chair for Strategy Center for Strategic and International Studies Revised July 21, 2002 Copyright Anthony H. Cordesman, all rights reserved. Iraq: A Dynamic Net Assessment 7/22/02 Page ii Introduction This document is an expanded version of a report originally prepared for a conference at the Naval War College in July 2002. The author would like to thank his colleagues at that conference for many suggestions and corrections. He would also like to thank the Smith-Richardson Foundation for some of the funding for the project. Copyright Anthony H. Cordesman, all rights reserved. Iraq: A Dynamic Net Assessment 7/22/02 Page iii Table of Contents INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................................................................ 1 IRAQ’S CURRENT MILITARY FORCES....................................................................................................................................... 1 The Iraqi Army and Key Security Elements......................................................................................................................1 The Deployment of Army and Security Elements .............................................................................................................
  • Motte and Bailey Castles

    Motte and Bailey Castles

    Motte and Bailey Castles What Is a Motte and Bailey Castle? The motte: This was a __________ with a tower (or ‘keep’) built on ________. The bailey: This was where the soldiers, ___________ and animals lived. It had a _____________ fence around it. The keep: This was the tower or ___________. The moat: This was a deep _________ filled with water. Label the picture below, using the bold words above. Who Built Motte and Bailey Castles? Motte and bailey castles were built in____________ by the Normans (people who _________ from France). What Else Was in a Motte and Bailey Castle? • bakeries • barracks (buildings for soldiers) • ___________ • ___________ for horses Word Bank Ireland stables wooden hill kitchens ditch castle top servants came Motte and Bailey Castles Answers What Is a Motte and Bailey Castle? The motte: This was a hill with a tower (or ‘keep’) built on top. The bailey: This was where the soldiers, servants and animals lived. It had a wooden fence around it. The keep: This was the tower or castle. The moat: This was a deep ditch filled with water. Label the picture below, using the bold words above. keep motte bailey moat Who Built Motte and Bailey Castles? Motte and bailey castles were built inIreland by the Normans (people who came from France). What Else Was in a Motte and Bailey Castle? • bakeries • barracks (buildings for soldiers) • kitchens • stables for horses Word Bank Ireland stables wooden hill kitchens ditch castle top servants came Page 1 of 1 Motte and Bailey Castles What Is a Motte and Bailey Castle? The motte was a _______ hill, which would normally be man-made.
  • Iraq: U.S. Regime Change Efforts and Post-Saddam Governance

    Iraq: U.S. Regime Change Efforts and Post-Saddam Governance

    Order Code RL31339 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Iraq: U.S. Regime Change Efforts and Post-Saddam Governance Updated November 21, 2005 Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Iraq: U.S. Regime Change Efforts and Post-Saddam Governance Summary Operation Iraqi Freedom succeeded in overthrowing Saddam Hussein, but Iraq remains violent and unstable because of Sunni Arab resentment and a related insurgency. The Bush Administration says that U.S. forces will remain in Iraq until the country is a stable democracy that will not host radical Islamist forces. The Administration has held out Iraq as a potential model for reform throughout the Middle East. However, mounting casualties and costs have intensified a debate within the United States over the wisdom of the invasion and whether or not to wind down U.S. involvement without completely accomplishing those goals. The Bush Administration asserts that U.S. policy in Iraq is showing important successes, demonstrated by elections that chose a National Assembly (January 30, 2005), a referendum that adopted a permanent constitution (October 15, 2005), progress in building Iraq’s security forces, and economic growth. The next major milestone will be the holding of elections for a permanent government by December 15, 2005. While continuing to build, equip, and train Iraqi security units, the Administration has been working with the new Iraqi government to include more Sunni Arabs in the power structure; Sunnis, many of whom are mobilizing to vote against the draft constitution, were dominant during the regime of Saddam Hussein and now feel marginalized by the newly dominant Shiite Arabs and Kurds.
  • Introduction to Wildland Fire Suppression for Michigan Fire Departments

    Introduction to Wildland Fire Suppression for Michigan Fire Departments

    Introduction to Wildland Fire Suppression for Michigan Fire Departments STUDENT WORKBOOK 1ST Edition – 2002 MDNR NONDISCRIMINATION STATEMENT Equal Rights for Natural Resource Users The Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) provides equal opportunities for employment and access to Michigan’s natural resources. Both State and Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, disability, age, sex, height, weight or marital status under the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 as amended (MI PA 453 and MI PA 220, Title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended, and the Americans with Disabilities Act). If you believe that you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility, or if you desire additional information, please write: Human Resources Michigan Department Of Natural Resources PO BOX 30028 Lansing MI 48909-7528 Or Michigan Department Of Civil Rights Or Office For Diversity And Civil Rights State Of Michigan Plaza Building US Fish And Wildlife Service 1200 6th Street 4040 North Fairfax Drive Detroit MI 48226 Arlington Va 22203 For information on or assistance with this publication, contact the Michigan Department Of Natural Resources, Forest, Mineral, & Fire Management Division, PO Box 30452, Lansing MI 48909-7952. Printed By Authority of Part 515, Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act (1994 PA 451) Total Number Of Copies Printed: 1500 Total Cost: $3549.17 Cost Per Copy:$2.36 Michigan Department of Natural Resources "CODE OF CONDUCT FOR SAFE PRACTICES" * Firefighter safety comes first on every fire, every time. * The 10 Standard Fire Orders are firm. We don't break them; we don't bend them.
  • The 2003 Iraq War: Operations, Causes, and Consequences

    The 2003 Iraq War: Operations, Causes, and Consequences

    IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (JHSS) ISSN: 2279-0837, ISBN: 2279-0845. Volume 4, Issue 5 (Nov. - Dec. 2012), PP 29-47 www.Iosrjournals.Org The 2003 Iraq War: Operations, Causes, and Consequences Youssef Bassil LACSC – Lebanese Association for Computational Sciences Registered under No. 957, 2011, Beirut, Lebanon Abstract: The Iraq war is the Third Gulf War that was initiated with the military invasion of Iraq on March 2003 by the United States of American and its allies to put an end to the Baath Party of Saddam Hussein, the fifth President of Iraq and a prominent leader of the Baath party in the Iraqi region. The chief cause of this war was the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) that George W. Bush declared in response to the attacks of September 11. The events of this war were both brutal and severe on both parties as it resulted in the defeat of the Iraqi army and the depose and execution of Saddam Hussein, in addition to thousands of causalities and billionsof dollars expenses.This paperdiscusses the overt as well as the covert reasons behind the Iraqi war, in addition to its different objectives. It alsodiscusses the course of the war and its aftermath. This would shed the light on the consequences of the war on the political, economic, social, and humanitarian levels. Finally, the true intentions of the war are speculated. Keywords –Political Science, Warfare, Iraq War 2003, Global War on Terrorism I. INTRODUCTION The Iraq war, sometimes known as the Third Gulf War, began on March 20, 2003 with the invasion of Iraq known as "Iraqi Freedom Operation" by the alliance led by the United States against the Baath Party of Saddam Hussein.
  • MCWP 3-11.2 Chapter 5: Defensive Combat

    MCWP 3-11.2 Chapter 5: Defensive Combat

    MCRP 3-11.2, Marine Rifle Squad (DRAFT) 1 2 3 Chapter 5 4 5 Defensive Combat 6 7 Section I. General 8 9 5101. Purpose 10 11 The purpose of defensive action is to develop more favorable conditions for offensive action, to 12 economize forces to allow the concentration of force elsewhere and retain or control terrain, and 13 gain time. The rifle squad should have an ambush mentality in which they seek to surprise and 14 trap the enemy in away that sets him up for the decisive counter-attack. 15 16 5102. Mission 17 18 The mission of the infantry in the defense is, with the support of other arms, to delay / harass the 19 enemy by fire as he approaches the battle position, to repel his assault by close combat if he 20 reaches the battle position, and to destroy him by counterattack. For the rifle squad, this mission 21 can be divided into three parts: 22 23 a. To delay or suppress the enemy by fire once he comes into small arms range of the squad's 24 fighting position. Depending on the mission, the enemy is delay or taken under fire as far forward 25 of the squad's fighting position as possible. The closer the enemy comes to the squad's fighting 26 position, the more friendly casualties he will inflict. Another technique is to deliver massed 27 surprise fires by withholding fires until the enemy can be surprised and trapped e.g. ambush. 28 29 b. If the enemy continues to press the attack to the point where he launches an assault, the squad 30 repels this assault by continuing to deliver fire as part of their unit's final protective fires and, if 31 necessary, by hand-to-hand combat.
  • Hearings to Examine Threats, Responses, and Regional Considerations Surrounding Iraq

    Hearings to Examine Threats, Responses, and Regional Considerations Surrounding Iraq

    S. HRG. 107–658 HEARINGS TO EXAMINE THREATS, RESPONSES, AND REGIONAL CONSIDERATIONS SURROUNDING IRAQ HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JULY 31 AND AUGUST 1, 2002 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Relations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 81–697 PDF WASHINGTON : 2002 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 18:09 Sep 20, 2002 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 81697 SFRELA1 PsN: SFRELA1 COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware, Chairman PAUL S. SARBANES, Maryland JESSE HELMS, North Carolina CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, Connecticut RICHARD G. LUGAR, Indiana JOHN F. KERRY, Massachusetts CHUCK HAGEL, Nebraska RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin GORDON H. SMITH, Oregon PAUL D. WELLSTONE, Minnesota BILL FRIST, Tennessee BARBARA BOXER, California LINCOLN D. CHAFEE, Rhode Island ROBERT G. TORRICELLI, New Jersey GEORGE ALLEN, Virginia BILL NELSON, Florida SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER IV, West Virginia MICHAEL B. ENZI, Wyoming ANTONY J. BLINKEN, Staff Director PATRICIA A. MCNERNEY, Republican Staff Director (II) VerDate 11-MAY-2000 18:09 Sep 20, 2002 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 81697 SFRELA1 PsN: SFRELA1 CONTENTS WEDNESDAY, JULY 31, 2002 Page Ajami, Prof. Fouad, Majid Khadduri professor and director of Middle East Studies, School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins Univer- sity, Washington, DC ..........................................................................................
  • The Motte and Bailey Castle at Aldford by Bevis Sale and Rich Turner

    The Motte and Bailey Castle at Aldford by Bevis Sale and Rich Turner

    The Motte and Bailey Castle at Aldford by Bevis Sale and Rich Turner This substantial set of earthworks is the best surviving example of a Norman Castle in Cheshire. Though large in size, they are typical of the many motte and bailey castles which survived throughout England and Wales. There original aim was to provide protection for the new Norman landlords who had taken over the Saxon manors. They continued to be built well into the 12' century and especially during periods of civil unrest which racked England during this period. When plotted on a distribution map they also seem to have another function. There is a great concentration of these castles throughout the Welsh Marches from Cheshire down to Gloucestershire which provided a well defended informal frontier between England and Wales (Renn, 1968). Husain (1973) has gone further and suggested that the castles at Shotwick Park, Trueman's Hill Hawarden, Dodleston, Pulford and Aldford were built as an outer defense to Chester, but without accurate dates of construction it is difficult to defend this argument. The two jrincipal earthworks at Aldford, the motte and the bailey will be described separately. The motte contains a very large &ea for a non-royal castle (1280 sq.m). The motte top is sub-rectangular and almost flat, except for mounds of rubble in the south-eastern and north-eastern comers. The motte was formerly tree covered and shallow pits where stumps were removed are just visible and there is one irregular pit showing sandstone rubble. Therefore it seems unlikely that there was not a central tower or donjon to the motte as its collapse or foundations would have left a raised entre'.