DOCSLIB.ORG

E Text of the Masoretes Its Character, Historical Seing, and Relationship to Jewish Biblical Exegesis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
E Text of the Masoretes Its Character, Historical Seing, and Relationship to Jewish Biblical Exegesis .D. esis e Text of the Masoretes Its Character, Historical Seing, and Relationship to Jewish Biblical Exegesis Petr Tomášek e Department of Old Testament Studies supervised by doc. Dr Martin Prudký Prague Disertační práce e Text of the Masoretes Its Character, Historical Seing, and Relationship to Jewish Biblical Exegesis Text Masoretů Jeho arakter, historiý kontext a vztah k židovské biblié exegezi Petr Tomášek katedra Starého zákona vedoucí doc. Dr Martin Prudký studijní program P Teologie studijní obor Bibliá teologie Praha Prohlášení Prohlašuji, že jsem tuto disertační práci s názvem „e Text of the Masoretes: Its Character, Historical Seing and Its Relationship to the Jewish Biblical Exegesis“ napsal samostatně a výhradně s použitím citovaných pramenů. Souhlasím s tím, aby práce byla zveřejněna pro účely výzkumu a soukromého studia. V Praze dne .. .................................... Petr Tomášek Aowledgement I hereby confirm that I have wrien this doctoral thesis on my own and that I have not used any other sources than the ones referred to in this thesis. Permission is granted to use and distribute this work for purposes of research or private study. Prague, November , .................................... Petr Tomášek Bibliographic Citatation Petr Tomášek. “e Text of the Masoretes: Its Character, Historical Seing and Relationship to the Jewish Biblical Exegesis.” .D. diss., Charles University of Prague, Protestant eological Faculty . Summary is work tries to take a new look at the Masoretic text of the Hebrew Bible. Based on the assumption that the masoretic vocalization has its roots in the oral tradition it asks what is the character of this text, why it was transmied orally, and in which context it was wrien down only at such a late date. It asks further what was the function and mutual relationship of the other masoretic elements: the Hebrew vocalization, the accentuation and the Masoretic notes, and whether they all can be traced back to a common denominator. Lastly, this work tries to answer a question whether the masoretic tradition presented a reinterpretation of the consonantal text to some degree. To answer these questions this thesis analyses phenomena connected to the masoretic vocalization, accentuation and masoretic notes. Further, it observes some grammatically unusual masoretic forms. It comes to the conclusion that all of the masoretic elements of the Hebrew biblical text are to be traced back to an institutionalized oral study of Bible, which was the prevalent way of learning before the literacy became common. e present work could not testify any interpretative tendency in the Hebrew vocalization. Keywords Hebrew Bible, Old Testament, textual criticism, Masoretic text, punctuation, vocalization, Hebrew accents, liturgical chant, targum, masoretic notes, oral study. נוסח המסורה, הניקוד, טעמי המקרא, הערות המסורה, תרגום, לימוד פעל-פה. Bibliografiá citace e Text of the Masoretes [rukopis]: Its Character, Historical Seing, and Relationship to Jewish Biblical Exegesis: Disertační práce / Petr Tomášek; vedoucí práce: doc. Dr Martin Prudký.―Praha .―v, s. Anotace Tato práce se snaží nově prozkoumat masoretský text Hebrejské bible. Na základě předpokladu, že masoret- ská vokalizace má svůj základ v ústní tradici, se táže, jaký byl charakter tohoto textu, proč byl předáván ústně a v jakém kontextu byl zapsán teprve v dosti pozdní době. Dále se tato práce ptá, jaká byla funkce a vzájemný vztah jednotlivých masoretských elementů: hebrejské vokalizace, akcentuace a masoretických poznámek, a zda-li všechny tyto elementy mají nějaký společný základ. Tato práce se rovněž táže, zda-li masoretská tradice představovala do nějaké míry reinterpretaci hebrejského konsonantního textu. K zod- povězení těchto otázek analyzuje tato dizertace jevy související s masoretskou vokalizací, akcentuací a s masoretskými poznámkami a dále si všímá některých gramaticky nezvyklých masoretských tvarů. Práce dochází k závěru, že všechny masoretské elementy hebrejského biblického textu lze chápat jako výsledek institucionalizovaného ústního studia biblického textu, které bylo běžné dokud se dostatečně nerozšířila gramotnost. Práce nepotvrdila žádné interpretativní tendence hebrejské vokalizace. Klíčová slova Hebrejská Bible, Starý zákon, textová kritika, masoretiský text, punktace, vokalizace, hebrejské akcenty, litur- gický zpěv, targum, masoretské poznámky, ústní tradice. Table of Content Abbreviations, Sigla, Signs................................................................................................................. i Masoretic and Other Notation Systems.......................................................................................... iv T P M T.......................................................................................... . Basic estions of the Present Work......................................................................................... T J B S O T..................................... . Socio-economic Conditions of the Transmission of Biblical text in the Rab- binic period ...................................................................................................................................... . e Role of Orality in the Rabbinic Times................................................................................ .. e Ability to Read but not to Write?........................................................................................ . Liturgy or Study?............................................................................................................................ .. Liturgical Reading as a Ritualized Form of the Study of the Bible...................................... . e Complementarity of the “Wrien-” and “Oral Torah”.................................................. .. Rabbis and Scribes: A Dispute over Authority........................................................................ . Conclusion........................................................................................................................................ M T C............................................................................................ . Masoretic and Proto-Masoretic Elements of the MT.............................................................. Excursus : e Suspended leers ................................................................................................. T V .............................................................................................................................. . e Qerē and Ketīḇ ......................................................................................................................... .. Explicative qerē/ketīḇ Notes?....................................................................................................... ............................................................................................ לוֹ/ לֹא .. e Homophonic Qerē/Ketīḇ Excursus : Some Peculiar Qerē/Ketīḇ Examples ....................................................................... .. Qerē/Ketīḇ in Manuscripts with Palestinian Pointings .......................................................... ... e Manuscript Cb (M. Dietrich) ............................................................................................. .. Further Evidence............................................................................................................................. ... Evidence from the Targumic Masora ......................................................................................... . Evidence from Biblical otations............................................................................................. . e Qerē as a Reinterpretation of the Consonants? ............................................................... T H A........................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................... טעמים . e Prosodic Nature of the . e Accents as a Mnemonic Device ........................................................................................... Excursus : e Byzantine ekphonetic neumes........................................................................... . Accents in the Whole Hebrew Bible .......................................................................................... .. e Accentuation of the “Poetical Books”................................................................................ . e Accentuation of the Targum ................................................................................................ Excursus : Words with Double Accentuation and the Text of the Targumīm...................... . e Accentuation of the Rabbinic Literature ........................................................................... . e Accentuation of Other Texts ................................................................................................ . Disagreement of the Vocalization with the Accents .............................................................. M N................................................................................................................................ . An Example: e Masora parva of J ................................................................................. . e Character of the Masoretic notes of the ʾOklā-ve-ʾOḵ lā̱ Collection ............................ .. e
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Miscellaneous Biblical Studies
    MISCELLANEOUS BIBLICAL STUDIES Thomas F. McDaniel, Ph.D. © 2010 All Rights Reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS iv I. SOME OBSERVATIONS ON GENDER AND SEXUALITY IN BIBLICAL TRADITION 1 II. WHY THE NAME OF GOD WAS INEFFABLE 72 III. ELIMINATING ‘THE ENEMIES OF THE LORD’ IN II SAMUEL 12:14 84 IV. RECONSIDERING THE ARABIC COGNATES WHICH CLARIFY PSALM 40:7 89 V. A NEW INTERPRETATION OF PROV 25:21–22 AND ROM 12:17–21 99 VI. ARABIC COGNATES HELP TO CLARIFY JEREMIAH 2:34b 107 VII. NOTES ON MATTHEW 6:34 “SUFFICIENT UNTO THE DAY IS THE EVIL THEREOF” 116 VIII. WHAT DID JESUS WRITE ACCORDING TO JOHN 8:6b–8? 127 IX. NOTES ON JOHN 19:39, 20:15 AND MATT 3:7 138 X. RECOVERING JESUS’ WORDS BY WHICH HE INITIATED THE EUCHARIST 151 XI. UNDERSTANDING SARAH’S LAUGHTER AND LYING: GENESIS 18:9–18 167 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS XII. REDEFINING THE eivkh/, r`aka,, AND mwre, IN MATTHEW 5:22 182 XIII. LUKE’S MISINTERPRETATION OF THE HEBREW QUOTATION IN ACTS 26:14 205 XIV. THE ORIGIN OF JESUS ’ “MESSIANIC SECRET” 219 XV. LOST LEXEMES CLARIFY MARK 1:41 AND JOHN 3:3–4 245 XVI. LOST LEXEMES CLARIFY JOHN 11:33 AND 11:38 256 XVII. A NEW INTERPRETATION OF JESUS’ CURSING THE FIG TREE 267 XVIII A NEW INTERPRETATION OF JESUS’ PARABLE OF THE WEDDING BANQUET 287 XIX RESTORING THE ORIGINAL VERSIFICATION OF ISAIAH 8 305 XX A BETTER INTERPRETATION OF ISAIAH 9:5–6a 315 XXI THE SEPTUAGINT HAS THE CORRECT TRANSLATION OF EXODUS 21:22–23 321 iii XXII RECOVERING THE WORDPLAY IN ZECHARIAH 2:4–9 [MT 2:8–13] 337 BIBLIOGRAPHY 348 iv ABBREVIATIONS A-text Codex Alexandrinus AB Anchor Bible, New York ABD The Anchor Bible Dictionary AJSL American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literature, Chicago AnBib Analecta Biblica, Rome AOS American Oriental Society, New Haven ATD Das Alte Testament Deutsch, Göttingen AV Authorized Version of the Bible, 1611 (same as KJV, 1611) B-text Codex Vaticanus BASOR Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, Philadelphia BCTP A Bible Commentary for Teaching and Preaching BDB F.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesis, Book of 2. E
    II • 933 GENESIS, BOOK OF Pharaoh's infatuation with Sarai, the defeat of the four Genesis 2:4a in the Greek translation: "This is the book of kings and the promise of descendants. There are a num­ the origins (geneseos) of heaven and earth." The book is ber of events which are added to, or more detailed than, called Genesis in the Septuagint, whence the name came the biblical version: Abram's dream, predicting how Sarai into the Vulgate and eventually into modern usage. In will save his life (and in which he and his wife are symbol­ Jewish tradition the first word of the book serves as its ized by a cedar and a palm tree); a visit by three Egyptians name, thus the book is called BeriPSit. The origin of the (one named Hirkanos) to Abram and their subsequent name is easier to ascertain than most other aspects of the report of Sarai's beauty to Pharaoh; an account of Abram's book, which will be treated under the following headings: prayer, the affliction of the Egyptians, and their subse­ quent healing; and a description of the land to be inher­ A. Text ited by Abram's descendants. Stylistically, the Apocryphon B. Sources may be described as a pseudepigraphon, since events are l. J related in the first person with the patriarchs Lamech, 2. E Noah and Abram in turn acting as narrator, though from 3. p 22.18 (MT 14:21) to the end of the published text (22.34) 4. The Promises Writer the narrative is in the third person.
    [Show full text]
  • ISO/IEC JTC1/SC2/WG2 N2714 L2/04-089R A. Administrative B
    ISO/IEC JTC1/SC2/WG2 N2714 L2/04-089R 2004-03-04 Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set International Organization for Standardization Organisation Internationale de Normalisation еждународная организация по стандартизации Doc Type: Working Group Document Title: Proposal to add two Masoretic punctuation marks to the BMP of the UCS Source: Mark Shoulson, Peter Kirk, John Hudson, Michael Everson, and Peter Constable Status: Individual Contribution Action: For consideration by JTC1/SC2/WG2 and UTC Date: 2004-03-04 This document requests an additional character to be added to the UCS and contains the proposal summary form. A. Administrative 1. Title Proposal to add two Masoretic punctuation marks to the BMP of the UCS. 2. Requester’s name Mark Shoulson, Peter Kirk, John Hudson, Michael Everson, and Peter Constable 3. Requester type (Member body/Liaison/Individual contribution) Individual contribution. 4. Submission date 2004-03-04 5. Requester’s reference (if applicable) 6. Choose one of the following: 6a. This is a complete proposal Yes. 6b. More information will be provided later No. B. Technical – General 1. Choose one of the following: 1a. This proposal is for a new script (set of characters) No. Proposed name of script 1b. The proposal is for addition of character(s) to an existing block Yes. 1b. Name of the existing block Hebrew 2. Number of characters in proposal 2 3. Proposed category (see section II, Character Categories) Category B.1 4a. Proposed Level of Implementation (1, 2 or 3) (see clause 14, ISO/IEC 10646-1: 2000) Level 1. 4b. Is a rationale provided for the choice? Yes.
    [Show full text]
  • UTS: Edward Robinson Papers, 1836-1838
    The Burke Library at Union Theological Seminary, Columbia University in the City of New York Union Theological Seminary Archives 1 Finding Aid for Edward Robinson Papers, 1836-1838 Edward Robinson Faculty Photograph, UTS2: Union Theological Seminary Records, Series 18C, box 5, folder R-S, the Burke Library at Union Theological Seminary, Columbia University in the City of New York Finding Aid prepared by: Rebecca Nieto, August 2016 With financial support from the Henry Luce Foundation and the E. Rhodes and Leona B. Carpenter Foundation Summary Information Creator: Edward Robinson, 1794 – 1863 Title: Edward Robinson Papers, 1836-1838 Inclusive dates: 1836-1838 with some undated material Bulk dates: 1838 Abstract: Presbyterian minister, Biblical historian, translator, geographer, UTS professor and faculty librarian. Papers consist of divided bound manuscript materials recounting travels in Palestine and environs circa 1838; journals and itineraries; language workbooks; Heinrich Kiepert memoir and annotated galleys of Friedrich Wilhelm Gesenius’ Hebrew lexicon [undated]. Materials include text in English, German, Arabic, Greek, Latin, and Hebrew. Size: 7 boxes, 2.75 linear feet Storage: Onsite storage Repository: The Burke Library Union Theological Seminary 3041 Broadway New York, NY 10027 Email: [email protected] UTS 1: Edward Robinson Papers, 1838 2 Administrative Information Provenance: The Edward Robinson Papers are part of the Union Theological Seminary Archives, which comprises institutional and administrative records of the Seminary, combined with the papers of many organizations, scholars, pastors, laypersons, and others connected with the school. These papers were partially processed in 2014, and completed as part of a large group of unprocessed material that was organized in 2016 during an archival processing grant funded by the Henry Luce Foundation and the E.
    [Show full text]
  • Encoded Representations for Distinct Positional Uses of Hebrew Meteg Peter Constable, Microsoft Corporation 2004-09-13
    Encoded representations for distinct positional uses of Hebrew Meteg Peter Constable, Microsoft Corporation 2004-09-13 In some uses of the Hebrew script, particularly for Biblical text, a variety of combining marks are used. One of these marks is meteg, encoded as U+05BD, HEBREW POINT METEG. Meteg frequently occurs together with other combining marks. When meteg co-occurs with another mark that occupies the same general space below the base character, different relative arrangements of meteg and these other marks are possible. In some uses it is considered necessary to specify these relative arrangements of meteg and other marks in the encoded representation. A proposal1 has been submitted to UTC for how these different positionings of meteg should be specified in encoded representations. This proposal makes use of the control characters COMBINING GRAPHEME JOINER (CGJ), ZERO WIDTH JOINER (ZWJ) and ZERO WIDTH NON-JOINER (ZWNJ). This public-review issue is soliciting feedback on this proposal and, in particular, on the proposed use of ZWJ and ZWNJ for distinguishing between the different positional uses of the meteg. The details in this case are somewhat complex. Familiarity with combining marks, canonical combining classes, canonical ordering and canonical equivalence is assumed. Some background information on those topics is provided in an appendix. 1. Background: meteg in combination with below-base vowel marks Biblical Hebrew text includes a number of marks used to annotate the text, which were introduced by Masoretic scholars over a thousand years ago. These marks include vowel points and a number of accentuation marks that indicate structural units of the text, serving to guide the reader or chanter.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Things That Concordances Do Not Tell You
    358 The Testimony, September 2001 “walk away” is indicative of the hold which John Paul II and the Palestinian leader Yasser the Middle East has on the nations of the world. Arafat. As events continue to develop in the Mid- The article goes on to write of how the European dle East we should exhort one another as we see Union has been involved and how (in MacAskill’s the day approaching (Heb. 10:25). Let us remain opinion) there is scope for more involvement in faithful so that we might be with Christ as he the crisis. The Catholic Church is also increas- marches through Bozrah (Isa. 34:6) and moves to ingly becoming involved in the crisis. On 2 Au- Israel to carry out the “recompences for the con- gust 2001 a meeting took place between Pope troversy of Zion” (v. 8). 1234 1234 1234 EDITOR: John Nicholls, 17 Upper Trinity Road, Halstead, 1234 1234 1234 Essex, CO9 1EE. Tel. 01787 473089; 1234 1234 e-mail: [email protected] 1234 1234 Reviews 1234 1234 Some things that concordances do not tell you John Carder N ENGLISH the tense of a verb shows its That form is often referred to as the stem or root relation to time, that is, past tense, present of the verb. Itense or future tense. English is a very time- From that basic and most simple form, usu- orientated language, with distinct tenses. The ally consisting of just three Hebrew letters, all Hebrew of the Bible is completely different. It other parts of each Hebrew verb are derived.
    [Show full text]
  • How Was the Dageš in Biblical Hebrew Pronounced and Why Is It There? Geoffrey Khan
    1 pronounced and why is it בָּתִּ ים How was the dageš in Biblical Hebrew there? Geoffrey Khan houses’ is generally presented as an enigma in‘ בָּתִּ ים The dageš in the Biblical Hebrew plural form descriptions of the language. A wide variety of opinions about it have been expressed in Biblical Hebrew textbooks, reference grammars and the scholarly literature, but many of these are speculative without any direct or comparative evidence. One of the aims of this article is to examine the evidence for the way the dageš was pronounced in this word in sources that give us direct access to the Tiberian Masoretic reading tradition. A second aim is to propose a reason why the word has a dageš on the basis of comparative evidence within Biblical Hebrew reading traditions and other Semitic languages. בָּתִּיםבָּתִּ ים The Pronunciation of the Dageš in .1.0 The Tiberian vocalization signs and accents were created by the Masoretes of Tiberias in the early Islamic period to record an oral tradition of reading. There is evidence that this reading tradition had its roots in the Second Temple period, although some features of it appear to have developed at later periods. 1 The Tiberian reading was regarded in the Middle Ages as the most prestigious and authoritative tradition. On account of the authoritative status of the reading, great efforts were made by the Tiberian Masoretes to fix the tradition in a standardized form. There remained, nevertheless, some degree of variation in reading and sign notation in the Tiberian Masoretic school. By the end of the Masoretic period in the 10 th century C.E.
    [Show full text]
  • A Basic Chart of the Hebrew Vowels (And a Few Marks)
    A Basic Chart of the Hebrew Vowels (and a Few Marks) Name + Sample How it Sounds Mnemonics (& Some Notes) each A Dagesh looks like a פּ and ,כּ ,בּ .but a 1—( שֵׁגָדּ ) Dagesh dot in a He’ is a make a sound that dot. cannot be held—as ( קיִפַּמ ) Mapik opposed to the sounds .פ and ,כ ,ב of רּ 2. הּ (Heh with Mapik, which looks like Dagesh) sounds like the “h” in “hi.” 3. For all other letters, ignore. Example: ke’ivu-YAH = הָּיוּוִּאֿ ְכּ Meteg A mark that tells us A Meteg looks like the bottom of a stop sign that a syllable should ( גֶתֶֽמ ) be more stressed than being held by a stressed stop-sign-holder telling other syllables in the you to slow down for the ֽר word. stress(ed syllable). Example: -meku-TZE = תֶרֶֽצֻּקְֿמ ret Edited by Rabbi Jonah Rank for the Shaar Shalom Synagogue in Halifax, NS | 06.27.2018 1 A Basic Chart of the Hebrew Vowels (and a Few Marks) Name + Sample How it Sounds Mnemonics (& Some Notes) Sheva Nach No vowel sound. The Sheva Nach makes the sound that you might Just say the) ( וְ ֿשׁ אָ חָנ ) consonant as if no make when you are silent, and the Sheva Na‘ makes vowel were beneath the sound of you saying a (.it ְר really short “Eh” after someone asks you for Example: your opinion about .sif-RO something you disliked = וֹרְפִס Either way, the Sheva In this packet, we looks like the developing bubbles before the always put a line thought bubble rises, above a Sheva Na to helping you figure out make distinct-looking how to respond.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anti-Samaritan Attitude As Reflected in Rabbinic Midrashim
    religions Article The Anti‑Samaritan Attitude as Reflected in Rabbinic Midrashim Andreas Lehnardt Faculty of Protestant Theology, Johannes Gutenberg‑University Mainz, 55122 Mainz, Germany; lehnardt@uni‑mainz.de Abstract: Samaritans, as a group within the ranges of ancient ‘Judaisms’, are often mentioned in Talmud and Midrash. As comparable social–religious entities, they are regarded ambivalently by the rabbis. First, they were viewed as Jews, but from the end of the Tannaitic times, and especially after the Bar Kokhba revolt, they were perceived as non‑Jews, not reliable about different fields of Halakhic concern. Rabbinic writings reflect on this change in attitude and describe a long ongoing conflict and a growing anti‑Samaritan attitude. This article analyzes several dialogues betweenrab‑ bis and Samaritans transmitted in the Midrash on the book of Genesis, Bereshit Rabbah. In four larger sections, the famous Rabbi Me’ir is depicted as the counterpart of certain Samaritans. The analyses of these discussions try to show how rabbinic texts avoid any direct exegetical dispute over particular verses of the Torah, but point to other hermeneutical levels of discourse and the rejection of Samari‑ tan claims. These texts thus reflect a remarkable understanding of some Samaritan convictions, and they demonstrate how rabbis denounced Samaritanism and refuted their counterparts. The Rabbi Me’ir dialogues thus are an impressive literary witness to the final stages of the parting of ways of these diverging religious streams. Keywords: Samaritans; ancient Judaism; rabbinic literature; Talmud; Midrash Citation: Lehnardt, Andreas. 2021. The Anti‑Samaritan Attitude as 1 Reflected in Rabbinic Midrashim. The attitudes towards the Samaritans (or Kutim ) documented in rabbinical literature 2 Religions 12: 584.
    [Show full text]
  • Accents, Punctuation Or Cantillation Marks?
    Accents, Punctuation or Cantillation Marks? A Study of the Linguistic Basis of the ṭəʿ Matthew Phillip Monger Masteroppgave i SEM4090 Semittisk Språkvitenskap 60 studiepoeng Program: Asiatiske og afrikanske studier Studieretning: Semittisk språkvitenskap med hebraisk Instituttet for kulturstudier og orientalske språk UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 1. juni 2012 II Accents, Punctuation or Cantillation Marks? A Study of the Linguistic Basis of the ṭəʿ Matthew Phillip Monger (Proverbs 1:7) יִרְאַ ַ֣תיְְ֭הוָ ה רֵ אשִ ַ֣ ית דָ ָּ֑עַ ת III © Matthew Phillip Monger 2012 Accents, Punctuation or Cantillation Marks? The Linguistic Basis of the ṭəʿ Matthew Phillip Monger http://www.duo.uio.no/ Trykk: Reprosentralen, Universitetet i Oslo IV Abstract This thesis discusses different strategies for interpreting the placement of the ṭəʿ in Masoretic Text of the Hebrew Bible. After introducing the signs and their distribution in the text, the thesis looks at different levels of linguistic analysis where the ṭəʿ provide interesting information. At the word level, word stress and vowel length are discussed. At the phrase level, the different types of phrases are analyzed in light of a closest constituent analysis. At the verse level, the distribution of the ṭəʿ is shown to depend on simple rules which maximize the most common structures of Tiberian Hebrew. Prosodic structure is also evaluated to show what bearing that it has on the placement of the ṭəʿ . Finally, the ṭəʿ are discussed in relation to discourse features. The goal of the thesis is to show that the ṭəʿ are not simply musical notation, but have a linguistic basis, and provide insight into linguistic features of Tiberian Hebrew.
    [Show full text]
  • Psftx-Debian-10.5/Hebrew-Fixed13.Psf Linux Console Font Codechart
    psftx-debian-10.5/Hebrew-Fixed13.psf Linux console font codechart Glyphs 0x00 to 0x3F 0x00 0x01 0x02 0x03 0x04 0x05 0x06 0x07 0x08 0x09 0x0A 0x0B 0x0C 0x0D 0x0E 0x0F 0x10 0x11 0x12 0x13 0x14 0x15 0x16 0x17 0x18 0x19 0x1A 0x1B 0x1C 0x1D 0x1E 0x1F 0x20 0x21 0x22 0x23 0x24 0x25 0x26 0x27 0x28 0x29 0x2A 0x2B 0x2C 0x2D 0x2E 0x2F 0x30 0x31 0x32 0x33 0x34 0x35 0x36 0x37 0x38 0x39 0x3A 0x3B 0x3C 0x3D 0x3E 0x3F Page 1 Glyphs 0x40 to 0x7F 0x40 0x41 0x42 0x43 0x44 0x45 0x46 0x47 0x48 0x49 0x4A 0x4B 0x4C 0x4D 0x4E 0x4F 0x50 0x51 0x52 0x53 0x54 0x55 0x56 0x57 0x58 0x59 0x5A 0x5B 0x5C 0x5D 0x5E 0x5F 0x60 0x61 0x62 0x63 0x64 0x65 0x66 0x67 0x68 0x69 0x6A 0x6B 0x6C 0x6D 0x6E 0x6F 0x70 0x71 0x72 0x73 0x74 0x75 0x76 0x77 0x78 0x79 0x7A 0x7B 0x7C 0x7D 0x7E 0x7F Page 2 Glyphs 0x80 to 0xBF 0x80 0x81 0x82 0x83 0x84 0x85 0x86 0x87 0x88 0x89 0x8A 0x8B 0x8C 0x8D 0x8E 0x8F 0x90 0x91 0x92 0x93 0x94 0x95 0x96 0x97 0x98 0x99 0x9A 0x9B 0x9C 0x9D 0x9E 0x9F 0xA0 0xA1 0xA2 0xA3 0xA4 0xA5 0xA6 0xA7 0xA8 0xA9 0xAA 0xAB 0xAC 0xAD 0xAE 0xAF 0xB0 0xB1 0xB2 0xB3 0xB4 0xB5 0xB6 0xB7 0xB8 0xB9 0xBA 0xBB 0xBC 0xBD 0xBE 0xBF Page 3 Glyphs 0xC0 to 0xFF 0xC0 0xC1 0xC2 0xC3 0xC4 0xC5 0xC6 0xC7 0xC8 0xC9 0xCA 0xCB 0xCC 0xCD 0xCE 0xCF 0xD0 0xD1 0xD2 0xD3 0xD4 0xD5 0xD6 0xD7 0xD8 0xD9 0xDA 0xDB 0xDC 0xDD 0xDE 0xDF 0xE0 0xE1 0xE2 0xE3 0xE4 0xE5 0xE6 0xE7 0xE8 0xE9 0xEA 0xEB 0xEC 0xED 0xEE 0xEF 0xF0 0xF1 0xF2 0xF3 0xF4 0xF5 0xF6 0xF7 0xF8 0xF9 0xFA 0xFB 0xFC 0xFD 0xFE 0xFF Page 4 Font information 0x16 U+05B0 HEBREW POINT SHEVA Filename: psftx-debian-10.5/Hebrew-Fixed13.p 0x17 U+05B2 HEBREW
    [Show full text]
  • The Identity of the First Masoretes
    SEFARAD (Sef ) Vol. 67:1, enero-junio 2007 págs. 37-50 ISSN 0037-0894 The Identity of the First Masoretes ∗ Lea HIMMELFARB Bar-Ilan University Only a few studies have been written concerning the evolution of the Masorah. 1 Elijah ha-Levi Ashkenazi (Bahur) (1468-1529) wrote in the third introduction to his book Masoret ha-Masoret: “There were hundreds and thousands of Masoretes, generation after generation, for many years, and we do not know when they began and when they ended.” 2 He surmises that the Masoretes lived after the Talmudic period. According to Israel Yeivin, “The Masorah had its beginnings in the ha-- lakhot of the writing of the Torah scroll… The early ones who engaged in the Masorah were most likely the scribes in the early Second Temple period.” 3 He observes that “the activity of the Masoretes began after the Talmudic period, and continued until the beginning of the time of the grammarians, that is, ca. 550-950 CE.” 4 Both apparently refer to the written work of the Masoretes. Aron Dotan, however, writes: “The activity of the Masoretes begins in an earlier period, and accompanied the process of the transmission of the text, from * [email protected] 1 Determining the identity of the early Masoretes is an extremely suitable topic with which to honor my teacher, Prof. Aron Dotan, the acknowledged authority of the Masorah. This article was written following my lecture “On the Identity of the First Masoretes” delivered at the 16th Congress of the International Organization for Masoretic Studies (Cambridge, July 20, 2003).
    [Show full text]