DOCSLIB.ORG

Versjon 12 3007 Hele Oppgaven

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Versjon 12 3007 Hele Oppgaven To what extent – and through what channels – did Margaret Thatcher influence the course of British politics in the twelve years following her resignation as Prime Minister in 1990? Candidate: Ragnhild Vestli A Thesis presented to the Department of Literature, Area Studies and European Languages at the University of Oslo Autumn 2009 In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Master’s Degree in English. Supervisors: Atle L. Wold and Øivind Bratberg Chapter 1: ................................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction to the dissertation................................................................................................... 5 1.1: Question and three hypotheses........................................................................................ 5 1.2 Sources ........................................................................................................................... 12 1.3: Political science research and qualitative method......................................................... 14 1.4: Outline of dissertation................................................................................................... 16 Chapter 2: ................................................................................................................................. 18 British politics and political influence in general..................................................................... 18 2.1: What is politics?............................................................................................................ 18 2.1.1: The British polity ................................................................................................... 22 2.1.2: The British parliamentary system and democracy................................................. 23 2.1.3: Different democracy perspectives.......................................................................... 24 2.1.4: The British Parliament ........................................................................................... 25 2.2: Power in Britain: different perspectives and models .................................................... 28 2.3: Pressure groups and lobbying ....................................................................................... 29 2.4: The Conservative Party................................................................................................. 30 2.4.1: The Conservative Party leader ............................................................................... 30 2.4.2: The role of the backbenchers and the party whips................................................. 31 2.4.3: The Conservative peers .......................................................................................... 34 2.5: Conclusion..................................................................................................................... 35 Chapter 3: ................................................................................................................................. 36 How Margaret Thatcher influenced Parliament and the Conservative Party since 1990......... 36 3.1: Backbenchers and peers: How politicians and debates were influenced ...................... 36 3.1.1: Thatcher in the House of Commons....................................................................... 36 3.1.2: Thatcher in the House of Lords.............................................................................. 43 3.2: Wavering support for the Conservative Party............................................................... 46 3.3: Thatcher’s influence on different leaders of the Conservative Party 1990-2003.......... 50 3.3.1 Margaret Thatcher and John Major......................................................................... 50 3.3.2: Margaret Thatcher and William Hague 1997-2001 ............................................... 52 3.3.3: Margaret Thatcher and Iain Duncan Smith 2001-2003.......................................... 54 3.4: How party conferences were influenced by Thatcher and her ardent supporters ......... 55 3.5: How Thatcher’s legacy was perceived and how it continued to influence the party.... 60 3.6 Conclusion...................................................................................................................... 61 Chapter 4: ................................................................................................................................. 62 How Margaret Thatcher influenced public opinion by her public appearances and books ..... 62 4.1: Key speeches and their consequences........................................................................... 62 4.1.1 The Hague Speech, May 1992 ................................................................................ 63 4.1.2 The CNN speech in Washington DC, September 1992 .......................................... 64 4.1.3 The Prague Speech, May 1996................................................................................ 67 4.1.4 The Keith Joseph Memorial Lecture, January 1996................................................ 68 4.1.5 The Plymouth election rally speech, May 2001...................................................... 71 4.2: Democracy in Hong Kong and support for British firms in Asia ................................. 73 4.3: Book publications and their impact............................................................................... 74 4.3.1 The Downing Street Years ....................................................................................... 75 4.3.2 The Path to Power ................................................................................................... 77 4.3.3: Thatcher’s last book Statecraft ............................................................................... 80 4.4: Influential articles, their timing and effect.................................................................... 82 4.4.1 “The autumn of our discontent” in The European , October 1992 .......................... 83 2 4.4.2 “Don’t Undo My Work” in Newsweek, April 1992 ................................................ 84 4.4.3 “Stop the excuses. Help Bosnia now” in New York Times , August 1992............... 85 4.5: Interviews and articles about Margaret Thatcher.......................................................... 86 4.6: Conclusion..................................................................................................................... 90 Chapter 5: ................................................................................................................................. 92 The indirect influence via Eurosceptic, Thatcherite groups and Eurosceptic newspapers ...... 92 5.1: Think-tanks and Thatcherite Eurosceptic organizations............................................... 92 5.2: The Bruges Group ......................................................................................................... 93 5.3: Fresh Start ..................................................................................................................... 96 5.4: No Turning Back........................................................................................................... 99 5.5: Conservative Way Forward......................................................................................... 100 5.6: The 92 Group .............................................................................................................. 102 5.7: The European Foundation and the Referendum Party ................................................ 103 5.8: British newspapers and their support for Thatcher and her Eurosceptic views .......... 107 5.9: Conclusion................................................................................................................... 111 Chapter 6: ............................................................................................................................... 114 Conclusion.............................................................................................................................. 114 6.1: Margaret Thatcher’s influence on the Conservative Party in general and the parliamentary Conservative Party ...................................................................................... 114 6.2: Margaret Thatcher influenced public opinion through her public appearances, books and articles.......................................................................................................................... 116 6.3: Margaret Thatcher’s influence on Eurosceptic organizations contributed to increased Euroscepticism in Britain in the 1990s .............................................................................. 119 6.4: Final comments ........................................................................................................... 121 Bibliography........................................................................................................................... 123 3 Note: Micheal Heath’s cartoon on the title page was originally published in The Independent on 12 January 1996. This has been reproduced with the kind permission by Michael Heath in an e- mail exchange on 14 May 2009. The Independent was also contacted in the matter. Unfortunately the original was unavailable, so this reproduction is a scanned version from the newspaper. 4 Chapter 1: Introduction to the dissertation 1.1: Question and three hypotheses Margaret Thatcher was Britain’s premier
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HOUSE of COMMONS Exiting the European Union Committee
    HOUSE OF COMMONS Exiting the European Union Committee Oral evidence: The progress of the UK’s negotiations on EU withdrawal, HC 372 Monday 3 September 2018, Brussels Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 4 September 2018. Members present: Hilary Benn (Chair); Sir Christopher Chope; Stephen Crabb; Richard Graham; Peter Grant; Andrea Jenkyns; Stephen Kinnock; Jeremy Lefroy; Mr Pat McFadden; Seema Malhotra; Mr Jacob Rees-Mogg; Emma Reynolds; Stephen Timms; Mr John Whittingdale. Questions 2537 - 2563 Witnesses I: Michel Barnier, Chief Negotiator, European Commission, and Sabine Weyand, Deputy Chief Negotiator, European Commission. Examination of witnesses Witnesses: Michel Barnier and Sabine Weyand. Michel Barnier: Welcome once again. You are always welcome. Q2537 Chair: Michel, can I reciprocate on behalf of the Committee? It is very good to see you again. Can I begin by apologising that we had to let you down on the previous date when we were due to meet? We had certain important votes in Parliament that necessitated our attendance. Secondly, can I thank you very much for honouring the commitment you made to us the first time we met, that you would give evidence to the Committee on the record? Because as you are aware, today’s session is being recorded and will be published as an evidence session, so it is a slightly different format from our previous discussions. I understand entirely that you will want to check the English translation of what you said before the minutes are published and we realise that will take— Michel Barnier: Just to check that nothing is lost in translation.
    [Show full text]
  • Thatcher, Northern Ireland and Anglo-Irish Relations, 1979-1990
    From ‘as British as Finchley’ to ‘no selfish strategic interest’: Thatcher, Northern Ireland and Anglo-Irish Relations, 1979-1990 Fiona Diane McKelvey, BA (Hons), MRes Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences of Ulster University A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Ulster University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2018 I confirm that the word count of this thesis is less than 100,000 words excluding the title page, contents, acknowledgements, summary or abstract, abbreviations, footnotes, diagrams, maps, illustrations, tables, appendices, and references or bibliography Contents Acknowledgements i Abstract ii Abbreviations iii List of Tables v Introduction An Unrequited Love Affair? Unionism and Conservatism, 1885-1979 1 Research Questions, Contribution to Knowledge, Research Methods, Methodology and Structure of Thesis 1 Playing the Orange Card: Westminster and the Home Rule Crises, 1885-1921 10 The Realm of ‘old unhappy far-off things and battles long ago’: Ulster Unionists at Westminster after 1921 18 ‘For God's sake bring me a large Scotch. What a bloody awful country’: 1950-1974 22 Thatcher on the Road to Number Ten, 1975-1979 26 Conclusion 28 Chapter 1 Jack Lynch, Charles J. Haughey and Margaret Thatcher, 1979-1981 31 'Rise and Follow Charlie': Haughey's Journey from the Backbenches to the Taoiseach's Office 34 The Atkins Talks 40 Haughey’s Search for the ‘glittering prize’ 45 The Haughey-Thatcher Meetings 49 Conclusion 65 Chapter 2 Crisis in Ireland: The Hunger Strikes, 1980-1981
    [Show full text]
  • Ride-Buyers: Joe and Mark
    Ride-Buyers: Joe and Mark This is a long story about two of racing’s filthy rich ride-buyers, Joe Boyer (1890-1924) and Mark Thatcher, but it begins with Boyer’s distant relative William Burroughs, the beat generation’s favorite author, who wrote bandit books like “Junky” and “Naked Lunch,” and spent his life roaming the freak earth from Algiers to Mexico City to New Orleans hanging with three of other great beatniks Dean Moriarty, Sal Paradise, and Carlo Marx (all pseudonyms). Purposely spaced out in his various personas as dope fiend, petty criminal, sexual athlete, and firearms fanatic, Burroughs once played a game of “William Tell” with his wife and, while trying to shoot an apple off her head, missed and blew her brains out. Burroughs’ grandfather was the inventor of the world’s favorite multiplication appliance, the Burroughs Adding Machine, and Joe Boyer’s father was the company’s very own Chief Executive Officer. Yet when William Burroughs died in the late 1990s it was a cultural event in print and on TV; and the last time Joe Boyer, missing since 1924, was ever accorded a tribute was back in 1985, when the Indy 500’s Old Timers club posthumously inducted him into its Hall of Fame. Too bad that the counterculture drug addict and the Brickyard’s richest ride-buyer never hooked up - they’d have made quite a twining. Until the stock market tanked in 1929, the Roaring Twenties was the ultimate decade for enjoying private wealth and privilege, and Joe Boyer benefitted from wealth and privilege alike - A blue-blood of Detroit’s high-society who belonged to every snob country club that upper crust Michigan boasted of, Boyer, upon deciding he had to become a race driver in the Indy 500 as quickly as possible, wasted no time on formalities.
    [Show full text]
  • 301-United Kingdom: the Conservative Party *Note: All Code Justifications Which Appear in ALL CAPS Were Part of the Original ICPP Project (Janda, 1980)
    #301-United Kingdom: The Conservative Party *Note: All code justifications which appear in ALL CAPS were part of the original ICPP project (Janda, 1980). All other code justifications were subsequently provided by those credited after said justification. Variable 9.01: Nationalization of Structure 1950-1990: 5 CONSERVATIVE PARTY WAS ORGANIZED INTO TWELVE AREA COUNCILS IN ENGLAND AND WALES AND TWO DIVISIONS IN SCOTLAND. AREA COUNCILS MET FROM TWO TO FOUR TIMES YEARLY, WHILE AREA EXECUTIVE COMMITTEES FUNCTIONED IN THE INTERIM. AN AGENT OF THE CENTRAL OFFICE REPRESENTED THE INTERESTS OF THE NATIONAL PARTY, ACTING AS HONORARY SECRETARY FOR THE AREA COUNCIL. THESE REGIONAL ORGANIZATIONS IN THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY, WHICH HAD NO RESTRICTIONS ON THE TOPICS THEY COULD DISCUSS, EXERCISED SOMEWHAT MORE INDEPENDENCE OF ACTION THAN THEIR COUNTERPARTS IN THE LABOUR PARTY. (JANDA, 1980: 209) Norton notes that, "In terms of its internal organization, the party is hierarchical." (Norton, 1991:136) The hierarchy runs from the national organs through eleven regional offices in England, one in Wales and two in Scotland. Concerning the hierarchy and flow of authority, Kelly notes that even at the Conservative Local Government Conference and Exhibition, matters were arranged and managed at the national level. (Kelly,1989:58-9) [By Paul Sum] The Conservative Party in its 1974 Manifesto (Craig, 1975: 446), agreed the following: "In Scotland, we will: set up a Scottish Assembly; give the Secretary of State for Scotland, acting with the Scottish assembly, the power to decide how to spend Scotland's share of the U.K. budget; establish a Scottish development fund to provide substantial help with both the new problems created by oil, and with Scotland's old deprived areas; transfer the Oil Division of the Department of Energy to Scotland." [By Renata Chopra] As described in the Conservative Party publication The Right Approach (1976), Scotland feels that the Parliament and the government are out of touch with its needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliaments and Legislatures Series Samuel C. Patterson
    PARLIAMENTS AND LEGISLATURES SERIES SAMUEL C. PATTERSON GENERAL ADVISORY EDITOR Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government EDITED BY SHAUN BOWLER, DAVID M. FARRELL, AND RICHARD S. KATZ OHI O STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS COLUMBUS Copyright © 1999 by The Ohio State University. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Party discipline and parliamentary government / edited by Shaun Bowler, David M. Farrell, and Richard S. Katz. p. cm. — (Parliaments and legislatures series) Based on papers presented at a workshop which was part of the European Consortium for Political Research's joint sessions in France in 1995. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8142-0796-0 (cl: alk. paper). — ISBN 0-8142-5000-9 (pa : alk. paper) 1. Party discipline—Europe, Western. 2. Political parties—Europe, Western. 3. Legislative bodies—Europe, Western. I. Bowler, Shaun, 1958- . II. Farrell, David M., 1960- . III. Katz, Richard S. IV. European Consortium for Political Research. V. Series. JN94.A979P376 1998 328.3/75/ 094—dc21 98-11722 CIP Text design by Nighthawk Design. Type set in Times New Roman by Graphic Composition, Inc. Printed by Bookcrafters, Inc.. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials. ANSI Z39.48-1992. 98765432 1 Contents Foreword vii Preface ix Part I: Theories and Definitions 1 Party Cohesion, Party Discipline, and Parliaments 3 Shaun Bowler, David M. Farrell, and Richard S. Katz 2 How Political Parties Emerged from the Primeval Slime: Party Cohesion, Party Discipline, and the Formation of Governments 23 Michael Laver and Kenneth A.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservative Agenda for Constitutional Reform
    UCL DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE The Constitution Unit Department of Political Science UniversityThe Constitution College London Unit 29–30 Tavistock Square London WC1H 9QU phone: 020 7679 4977 fax: 020 7679 4978 The Conservative email: [email protected] www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit A genda for Constitutional The Constitution Unit at UCL is the UK’s foremost independent research body on constitutional change. It is part of the UCL School of Public Policy. THE CONSERVATIVE Robert Hazell founded the Constitution Unit in 1995 to do detailed research and planning on constitutional reform in the UK. The Unit has done work on every aspect AGENDA of the UK’s constitutional reform programme: devolution in Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and the English regions, reform of the House of Lords, electoral reform, R parliamentary reform, the new Supreme Court, the conduct of referendums, freedom eform Prof FOR CONSTITUTIONAL of information, the Human Rights Act. The Unit is the only body in the UK to cover the whole of the constitutional reform agenda. REFORM The Unit conducts academic research on current or future policy issues, often in collaboration with other universities and partners from overseas. We organise regular R programmes of seminars and conferences. We do consultancy work for government obert and other public bodies. We act as special advisers to government departments and H parliamentary committees. We work closely with government, parliament and the azell judiciary. All our work has a sharply practical focus, is concise and clearly written, timely and relevant to policy makers and practitioners. The Unit has always been multi disciplinary, with academic researchers drawn mainly from politics and law.
    [Show full text]
  • Mrs. Thatcher's Return to Victorian Values
    proceedings of the British Academy, 78, 9-29 Mrs. Thatcher’s Return to Victorian Values RAPHAEL SAMUEL University of Oxford I ‘VICTORIAN’was still being used as a routine term of opprobrium when, in the run-up to the 1983 election, Mrs. Thatcher annexed ‘Victorian values’ to her Party’s platform and turned them into a talisman for lost stabilities. It is still commonly used today as a byword for the repressive just as (a strange neologism of the 1940s) ‘Dickensian’ is used as a short-hand expression to describe conditions of squalor and want. In Mrs. Thatcher’s lexicon, ‘Victorian’ seems to have been an interchangeable term for the traditional and the old-fashioned, though when the occasion demanded she was not averse to using it in a perjorative sense. Marxism, she liked to say, was a Victorian, (or mid-Victorian) ideo1ogy;l and she criticised ninetenth-century paternalism as propounded by Disraeli as anachronistic.2 Read 12 December 1990. 0 The British Academy 1992. Thanks are due to Jonathan Clark and Christopher Smout for a critical reading of the first draft of this piece; to Fran Bennett of Child Poverty Action for advice on the ‘Scroungermania’ scare of 1975-6; and to the historians taking part in the ‘History Workshop’ symposium on ‘Victorian Values’ in 1983: Gareth Stedman Jones; Michael Ignatieff; Leonore Davidoff and Catherine Hall. Margaret Thatcher, Address to the Bow Group, 6 May 1978, reprinted in Bow Group, The Right Angle, London, 1979. ‘The Healthy State’, address to a Social Services Conference at Liverpool, 3 December 1976, in Margaret Thatcher, Let Our Children Grow Tall, London, 1977, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Party Leaders and Officials Since 1975
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 07154, 6 February 2020 Conservative Party and Compiled by officials since 1975 Sarah Dobson This List notes Conservative Party leaders and officials since 1975. Further reading Conservative Party website Conservative Party structure and organisation [pdf] Constitution of the Conservative Party: includes leadership election rules and procedures for selecting candidates. Oliver Letwin, Hearts and Minds: The Battle for the Conservative Party from Thatcher to the Present, Biteback, 2017 Tim Bale, The Conservative Party: From Thatcher to Cameron, Polity Press, 2016 Robert Blake, The Conservative Party from Peel to Major, Faber & Faber, 2011 Leadership elections The Commons Library briefing Leadership Elections: Conservative Party, 11 July 2016, looks at the current and previous rules for the election of the leader of the Conservative Party. Current state of the parties The current composition of the House of Commons and links to the websites of all the parties represented in the Commons can be found on the Parliament website: current state of the parties. www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Conservative Party leaders and officials since 1975 Leader start end Margaret Thatcher Feb 1975 Nov 1990 John Major Nov 1990 Jun 1997 William Hague Jun 1997 Sep 2001 Iain Duncan Smith Sep 2001 Nov 2003 Michael Howard Nov 2003 Dec 2005 David Cameron Dec 2005 Jul 2016 Theresa May Jul 2016 Jun 2019 Boris Johnson Jul 2019 present Deputy Leader # start end William Whitelaw Feb 1975 Aug 1991 Peter Lilley Jun 1998 Jun 1999 Michael Ancram Sep 2001 Dec 2005 George Osborne * Dec 2005 July 2016 William Hague * Dec 2009 May 2015 # There has not always been a deputy leader and it is often an official title of a senior Conservative politician.
    [Show full text]
  • Losing an Empire, Losing a Role?: the Commonwealth Vision, British Identity, and African Decolonization, 1959-1963
    LOSING AN EMPIRE, LOSING A ROLE?: THE COMMONWEALTH VISION, BRITISH IDENTITY, AND AFRICAN DECOLONIZATION, 1959-1963 By Emily Lowrance-Floyd Submitted to the graduate degree program in History and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Chairperson Dr. Victor Bailey . Dr. Katherine Clark . Dr. Dorice Williams Elliott . Dr. Elizabeth MacGonagle . Dr. Leslie Tuttle Date Defended: April 6, 2012 ii The Dissertation Committee for Emily Lowrance-Floyd certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: LOSING AN EMPIRE, LOSING A ROLE?: THE COMMONWEALTH VISION, BRITISH IDENTITY, AND AFRICAN DECOLONIZATION, 1959-1963 . Chairperson Dr. Victor Bailey Date approved: April 6, 2012 iii ABSTRACT Many observers of British national identity assume that decolonization presaged a crisis in the meaning of Britishness. The rise of the new imperial history, which contends Empire was central to Britishness, has only strengthened faith in this assumption, yet few historians have explored the actual connections between end of empire and British national identity. This project examines just this assumption by studying the final moments of decolonization in Africa between 1959 and 1963. Debates in the popular political culture and media demonstrate the extent to which British identity and meanings of Britishness on the world stage intertwined with the process of decolonization. A discursive tradition characterized as the “Whiggish vision,” in the words of historian Wm. Roger Louis, emerged most pronounced in this era. This vision, developed over the centuries of Britain imagining its Empire, posited that the British Empire was a benign, liberalizing force in the world and forecasted a teleology in which Empire would peacefully transform into a free, associative Commonwealth of Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Thecoalition
    The Coalition Voters, Parties and Institutions Welcome to this interactive pdf version of The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Please note that in order to view this pdf as intended and to take full advantage of the interactive functions, we strongly recommend you open this document in Adobe Acrobat. Adobe Acrobat Reader is free to download and you can do so from the Adobe website (click to open webpage). Navigation • Each page includes a navigation bar with buttons to view the previous and next pages, along with a button to return to the contents page at any time • You can click on any of the titles on the contents page to take you directly to each article Figures • To examine any of the figures in more detail, you can click on the + button beside each figure to open a magnified view. You can also click on the diagram itself. To return to the full page view, click on the - button Weblinks and email addresses • All web links and email addresses are live links - you can click on them to open a website or new email <>contents The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Edited by: Hussein Kassim Charles Clarke Catherine Haddon <>contents Published 2012 Commissioned by School of Political, Social and International Studies University of East Anglia Norwich Design by Woolf Designs (www.woolfdesigns.co.uk) <>contents Introduction 03 The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Introduction The formation of the Conservative-Liberal In his opening paper, Bob Worcester discusses Democratic administration in May 2010 was a public opinion and support for the parties in major political event.
    [Show full text]
  • Simon Usherwood
    OPPOSITION TO THE EUROPEAN UNION IN THE UK 211 Simon Usherwood Opposition to the European Union in the UK: The Dilemma of Public Opinion and Party Management THE MAIN AIM OF THIS ARTICLE IS TO UNDERSTAND SOME OF THE processes at work in the management of European policy formation by political parties in the UK.1 More specifically, it attempts to apply and extend the model proposed by Aspinwall of institutional con- straints on that policy management.2 Whereas Aspinwall limits the application of his model to parliamentary coalitions and effective power, we push the model further by describing and analysing its interaction with other features of the political landscape, most notably the generally low level of interest in European affairs on the part of the British public. For almost all of the post-war period, the question of ‘Europe’ has been one that has occupied the minds of British legislators and governments.3 But the temptation for most commentators to con- centrate on cultural and historical explanations of ‘otherness’ in the British case has resulted in a neglect of the more practical effects of institutional structures. This article addresses some of those effects by first providing a brief overview of Aspinwall’s model, which suggests that the first-past-the-post (FPP) system creates centrifugal forces within the party system, resulting in parties holding com- promise policy positions. This is followed by a discussion of the 1 Thanks are due to Stephen George, Mark Aspinwall, Paul Taggart, Jo Waller and those at the presentation of this paper at the Political Studies Association 51st Conference, Manchester, 10–12 April 2001.
    [Show full text]