DOCSLIB.ORG

The Federal Columbia River Power System: Inside Story

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Federal Columbia River Power System: Inside Story THE COLUMBIA RIVER SYSTEM INSIDE STORY THE COLUMBIA RIVER SYSTEM INSIDE STORY SECOND EDITION FEDERAL COLUMBIA RIVER POWER SYSTEM BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Published April 2001 This publication is an updated version of the original prepared for the System Operation Review, a joint project of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and Bonneville Power Administration. Photo Credits: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Bonneville Power Administration Northwest Power Planning Council Philip W. Thor Robin Cody If you have comments or questions, please contact: Bonneville Power Administration U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, NWD U.S. Bureau of Reclamation 1-503-230-3000 1-503-808-3710 1-208-378-5021 P.O. Box 3621 P.O. Box 2870 1150 N. Curtis Road, Suite 100 Portland, Oregon 97208-3621 Portland, Oregon 97208-2870 Boise, Idaho 83706-1234 Printed on recycled paper TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction . 2 II. The Columbia River System . 4 A. The Basin . 4 B. Uses of the River System . 6 C. The Dams and Water Projects . 9 D. The Coordinated Columbia River System . 16 III. The Agencies and the Operating Agreements . 18 A. The Forecasters . 18 B. Project Owner/ Operators & Affiliated Agencies. 18 C. The NMFS Regional Implementation Forum. 20 D. The Operating Agreements and Guidelines. 21 IV. System Operation – The Big Picture . 26 A. Hydrology of the Basin . 26 B. The Drivers of System Operations . 27 C. Overview of System Operations . 27 V. Multiple Uses of the System . 32 A. Flood Control . 33 B. Fish and Wildlife . 38 C. Power Generation . 45 D. Navigation . 52 E. Irrigation. 53 F. Recreation. 55 G. Water Supply and Water Quality . 55 H. Cultural Resources . 56 VI. System Planning & Operations . 58 A. Current Operating Strategy . 58 B. The PNCA Planning Process . 60 C. In-Season Management for Salmon . 63 D. Real-Time Operations . 64 E. System Operation: In Action. 66 VII. Conclusion . 70 Appendix A Pacific Northwest Hydro Projects . 72 Appendix B Glossary. 74 Appendix C Acronyms and Abbreviations . 76 Appendix D Reference List . 78 I. Introduction Celilo Falls, shown here, was a Native American fishing site before The Dalles Dam was built. The Federal government is working to encourage more tribal involvement in planning and operating decisions. The Columbia River is projects throughout the system. Through cooperative one of the greatest natural region are fed by the waters efforts, floods that periodi- resources in the western of the Columbia Basin river cally threaten development United States. The river and near the river can be its tributaries touch the lives controlled. of nearly every resident of This publication presents the Pacific Northwest—from a detailed explanation of fostering world-famous the planning and operation Pacific salmon to supplying of the multiple-use dams clean natural fuel for 50 to and reservoirs of the 65 percent of the region’s Columbia River system. It electrical generation. describes the river system, Since early in the 20th those who operate and use century, public and private it, the agreements and agencies have labored to Federal water projects, including policies that guide system capture the benefits of this Lower Granite Dam on the Snake operations, and annual River, were constructed on the dynamic river. Today, dozens planning for multiple-use Columbia River and its tributaries of major water resource from the 1930s to the mid-1970s. operation. A glossary 2 and a reference list can be (USFWS) to recover several found at the end of this stocks of Snake River salmon document. and the Kootenai River The Inside Story was white sturgeon. The SOR originally written for the provided the environmental participants in a multiyear analysis of the ESA strategy environmental study of river and led to renewal of An operating operations called the the Pacific Northwest strategy was Columbia River System Coordination Agreement Operation Review (SOR). (PNCA) and other developed that The SOR was conducted agreements related to the supports recovery jointly by the U.S. Army Corps Columbia River Treaty of Engineers (Corps), the (Treaty) between the of Columbia Basin U.S. Bureau of Reclamation United States and Canada. fish listed under (Reclamation), and the These complex contracts Bonneville Power Administra- are explained in the the Endangered tion (BPA). In 1995, as a following pages. Species Act, as result of actions under the Electricity generated on the river If you have questions Endangered Species Act powers homes and businesses or comments about the well as other, (ESA) and the SOR, the three throughout the Northwest. Columbia River system, non-listed species. Federal agencies formally we invite you to contact adopted an operating The strategy incorporated one of the agencies at the strategy for the river system the recommendations of the addresses and phone that supports the recovery National Marine Fisheries numbers on the inside of Columbia River Basin Service (NMFS) and the U.S. front cover of this fish listed under the ESA. Fish and Wildlife Service publication. The river and its reservoirs provide countless recreational opportunities for residents and visitors to the Northwest. 3 A. The Basin and Utah. In addition, the empties into the Pacific Columbia River Basin Ocean near Astoria, Oregon. The Columbia River is drainage covers 102,300 The Rocky Mountains the predominant river in the square kilometers (39,500 to the east and north, the Pacific Northwest. It is the square miles) in British Cascade Range on the west, 15th longest river in North Columbia, Canada. and the Great Basin to the II. America and carries the sixth The Columbia River south are the principal largest volume of runoff. originates at Columbia Lake boundaries of the Columbia The Columbia The river and its tributaries on the west slope of British River Basin. Within the River System are the region’s dominant Columbia’s Rocky Mountains. drainage, there are numerous water system. The system It flows from Canada into the sub-basins formed by drains 567,000 square kilo- United States and eventually tributaries of the mainstem meters (219,000 square miles) becomes the border between river. The major tributaries in seven western U.S. states: Oregon and Washington. in the United States are the Washington, Oregon, Idaho, The river is 1,954 kilometers Kootenai, the Flathead/ Montana, Wyoming, Nevada, (1,214 miles) long, and it Pend Oreille, the Snake, and the Willamette. The Columbia River Uses The Highs and Lows of Streamflows. On average, about 25 percent of the Columbia River flow comes from Canada. Before any mainstem dams were built, natural instantaneous streamflow at the border ranged from as low as 396 cubic meters per second (m3/s) (14,000 cubic feet per second (cfs)) to as high as 15,575 m3/s (550,000 cfs). This enormous variation in flow is seasonal. Most of the annual precipi- tation in the Columbia River Basin occurs in the winter with the largest share falling in the mountains as snow. The moisture that is stored during the winter in the snowpack is released in the spring and early A. Flood Control D. Power G. Navigation B. Recreation E. Fish Migration H. Water Supply summer, and about 60 C. Irrigation F. Fish & Wildlife Habitat I. Cultural Resources percent of the natural runoff in the basin occurs The people of the Northwest use the Columbia River in nine primary ways. The water projects make up a multiple-use system. during May, June, and July. 4 The Columbia River Basin Major Federal Dams Today, dozens - COLUMBIA RIVER AND MAJOR TRIBUTARIES - STATE BORDERS of major water BRITISH COLUMBIA - COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN - MAJOR FEDERAL DAMS resource projects throughout the Hungry Horse region are fed BRITISH COLUMBIA Libby Albeni Falls Chief Joseph by the Columbia Grand Coulee Lower Granite River. Dworshak Little Goose Lower M Ice Harbor Runoff: That part of precipitation, Co ia River lumb onum snowmelt, or irrigation water that runs M John Day cNary ental PACIFC The Dalles off the land into streams or other Bonneville MONTANA OCEAN surface water. OREGON IDAHO S n ak Streamflow: Streamflow refers to the rate e Riv er and volume of water flowing in various sections of the river. Streamflow records are compiled from measurements taken at particular points on the river, such as The Dalles, Oregon. The Columbia drains 258,500 square miles in the United States and Canada. The Columbia River has acre-feet) annually. Southwest. Federal agencies an average annual runoff at For operational purposes, have built 29 major dams Major Dams: Large hydro-electric projects developed by Federal agencies within its mouth of about 244 billion runoff is usually measured on the river and its the Pacific Northwest. Twenty-nine major dams are in the Columbia River cubic meters (198 million at The Dalles, Oregon. Here tributaries. Dozens of Basin. Two dams are in the Rogue River acre-feet) (average year- the annual average is 165 larger non-Federal projects, Basin. A total of 31 dams comprise the Federal Power System. round flows of 7,787 m3/s billion cubic meters (134 and hundreds of small Acre-feet: A common measure of the (275,000 cfs)), making it million acre-feet) (average impoundments, have been volume of water in the river system. It is 3 the amount of water it takes to cover second only to the Missouri- year-round flows of 5,038 m /s developed as well. These one acre to a depth of one foot. Mississippi River system in (177,900 cfs)). dams provide flood control, the United States in runoff. Beginning in 1909, the irrigation, navigation, and The Canadian portion of the Columbia River has been recreation benefits.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Columbia River Treaty: Recommendations December 2013
    L O CA L GOVERNMEN TS’ COMMI TTEE Columbia River Treaty: Recommendations December 2013 The BC Columbia River Treaty Local Governments’ Committee (the Committee) has prepared these Recommendations in response to the Columbia River Treaty-related interests and issues raised by Columbia River Basin residents in Canada. These Recommendations are based on currently-available information. They have been submitted to the provincial and federal governments for incorporation into current decisions regarding the future of the Columbia River Treaty (CRT). The Committee plans to monitor the BC, Canadian and U.S. CRT-related processes and be directly involved when appropriate. As new information becomes available, the Committee will review this information, seek input from Basin residents, and submit further recommendations to the provincial and federal governments, if needed. The CRT Local Governments’ Committee will post its recommendations and other documents at www.akblg.ca/content/columbia-river-treaty. For more information contact the Committee Chair, Deb Kozak ([email protected] 250 352-9383) or the Executive Director, Cindy Pearce ([email protected] 250 837-3966). Background Beginning in 2024, either the U.S. or Canada can The Columbia River Treaty (Treaty) was ratified terminate substantial portions of the Treaty, by Canada and the United States (the U.S.) in with at least 10 years’ prior notice. Canada—via 1964, resulting in the construction of three the BC Provincial Government—and the U.S. are dams in Canada—Mica Dam north of both conducting reviews to consider whether to Revelstoke; Hugh Keenleyside Dam near continue, amend or terminate the Treaty. Castlegar; and Duncan Dam north of Kaslo—and Local governments within the Basin have Libby Dam near Libby, Montana.
    [Show full text]
  • Forests of Eastern Oregon: an Overview Sally Campbell, Dave Azuma, and Dale Weyermann
    Forests of Eastern Oregon: An Overview Sally Campbell, Dave Azuma, and Dale Weyermann United States Forest Pacific Northwest General Tecnical Report Department of Service Research Station PNW-GTR-578 Agriculture April 2003 Revised 2004 Joseph area, eastern Oregon. Photo by Tom Iraci Authors Sally Campbell is a biological scientist, Dave Azuma is a research forester, and Dale Weyermann is geographic information system manager, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 620 SW Main, Portland, OR 97205. Cover: Aspen, Umatilla National Forest. Photo by Tom Iraci Forests of Eastern Oregon: An Overview Sally Campbell, Dave Azuma, and Dale Weyermann U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland, OR April 2003 State Forester’s Welcome Dear Reader: The Oregon Department of Forestry and the USDA Forest Service invite you to read this overview of eastern Oregon forests, which provides highlights from recent forest inventories.This publication has been made possible by the USDA Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) Program, with support from the Oregon Department of Forestry. This report was developed from data gathered by the FIA in eastern Oregon’s forests in 1998 and 1999, and has been supplemented by inventories from Oregon’s national forests between 1993 and 1996.This report and other analyses of FIA inventory data will be extremely useful as we evaluate fire management strategies, opportunities for improving rural economies, and other elements of forest management in eastern Oregon.We greatly appreciate FIA’s willingness to work with the researchers, analysts, policymakers, and the general public to collect, analyze, and distrib- ute information about Oregon’s forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Kootenay System Operations
    Columbia River Treaty Review – Technical Studies Appendix C Kootenay System Operations Operation of the Kootenay River system is complicated as it is administered by several different jurisdictions and the hydroelectric facilities are owned by different agencies/companies. As shown in Figure 1, the Kootenay River originates in the Rocky Mountains not far from Field, BC. The river flows south, within a few km of the source of the Columbia River at Canal Flats, and then continues south into Koocanusa Reservoir, formed behind Libby Dam in Montana, United States. From Libby, the Kootenay River turns west and north, and re-enters British Columbia near the community of Creston, flowing into the south arm of Kootenay Lake. In the northern part of the Kootenay basin, the Duncan River is joined by the Lardeau River just downstream from Duncan Dam, and then flows into the north arm of Kootenay Lake. Water from the north and south arms of Kootenay Lake then flows through the west arm of the lake and past the Corra Linn Dam near Nelson (as well as other dams) en route to the Columbia–Kootenay confluence at Castlegar. The components of this system and various agreements/orders that regulate flows are described in this Appendix. November 29, 2013 1 Columbia River Treaty Review – Technical Studies Figure 1: Kootenay and Columbia Region November 29, 2013 2 Columbia River Treaty Review – Technical Studies 1.0 Coordination of Libby Operations Background Under the terms of the Columbia River Treaty, Canada permitted the U.S. to build the Libby Dam on the Kootenai River (U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • South Fork of the Flathead River Originates in the South End of the Bob Marshall Wilderness and Flows Northward to Hungry Horse Reservoir
    The South Fork Acclaimed as one of Montana’s most pristine and remote rivers, the Wild and Scenic South Fork of the Flathead River originates in the south end of the Bob Marshall Wilderness and flows northward to Hungry Horse Reservoir. Boats and supplies are generally packed in on mules or horses over mountain passes to reach the headwa- ters and then packed again from the take-out just above Meadow Creek Gorge, to Meadow Creek Trailhead. There are several commercial outfitters who can provide packing services or full-service floats, but plan ahead as they have limited space available. The floating season is generally from mid-June through late August. The river is Class II-III with standing river waves and shallow rocky shoals. Log jams and other hazards exist, and may change and move seasonally. Always scout from shore prior to floating into any river feature without clear passage. Due to its remoteness, the South Fork requires advanced planning and preparation. Contact the Spotted Bear Ranger Station for updated informa- tion on river and trail conditions, regulations and list of permitted outfitters. Restrictions All sections of the South Fork • Solid human waste containment and the use of fire pans and blankets is recommended. • Store your attractants in a bear resistant manner, in an approved container or vehicle, or hang. Section Specific Restrictions - Confluence with Youngs Creek to Cedar Flats - • Wilderness Section • The party size is limited to 15 people per group and 35 head of stock per party. • Use of weed free stock feed is required. • No wheeled carts or wheelbarrows.
    [Show full text]
  • Kootenai River Resident Fish Mitigation: White Sturgeon, Burbot, Native Salmonid Monitoring and Evaluation
    KOOTENAI RIVER RESIDENT FISH MITIGATION: WHITE STURGEON, BURBOT, NATIVE SALMONID MONITORING AND EVALUATION Annual Progress Report May 1, 2016 — April 31, 2017 BPA Project # 1988-065-00 Report covers work performed under BPA contract # 68393 IDFG Report Number 08-09 April 2018 This report was funded by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), U.S. Department of Energy, as part of BPA's program to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife affected by the development and operation of hydroelectric facilities on the Columbia River and its tributaries. The views in this report are the author's and do not necessarily represent the views of BPA. This report should be cited as follows: Ross et al. 2018. Report for 05/01/2016 – 04/30/2017. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER 1: KOOTENAI STURGEON MONITORING AND EVALUATION ............................... 1 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................2 OBJECTIVE ................................................................................................................................3 STUDY SITE ...............................................................................................................................3 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................3 Water
    [Show full text]
  • The Harney County Way Collaborative Summit May 2 – 3, 2018 | Lincoln Building Auditorium, Burns, OR
    The Harney County Way Collaborative Summit May 2 – 3, 2018 | Lincoln Building Auditorium, Burns, OR The Harney County Way Collaborative Summit 2018 Linking Collaboration Efforts to Build a Best Harney County High Desert Partnership’s Mission Summit Vision The High Desert Partnership exists to cultivate collaboration and We believe this summit will provide a productive time for those support and strengthen diverse partners engaged in solving participating in collaborative work in Harney County to network, complex issues to advance healthy ecosystems, economic well- learn and look for opportunities to work together. Bringing together being and social vitality to ensure a thriving and resilient the collaborative initiatives will create synergy and the story of community. collaboration will reverberate in our community. The outcomes from this summit will lead to more resilient communities. Our Core Values o We believe in our collaborative process to address societal Goals of the Summit issues. o Increase the understanding of collaborative efforts in Harney o We believe in doing things right rather than right now. County. o We believe in recognizing the values of others. o Understand the links where initiatives can work together on o We believe in advocating for the process, not for outcomes. projects or programs. o We believe in taking a holistic approach: social, ecological and o Find the places for sharing resources. economic. o Grow the community's collaborative participation. o We believe that optimism is necessary to successfully address o Provide a venue for those in attendance to gain a better the challenges we face. understanding of the work of High Desert Partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration Plan for Bull Trout in the Clark Fork River Basin and Kootenai River Basin Montana
    RESTORATION PLAN FOR BULL TROUT IN THE CLARK FORK RIVER BASIN AND KOOTENAI RIVER BASIN MONTANA Prepared by: MONTANA BULL TROUT RESTORATION TEAM FOR GOVERNOR MARC RACICOT c/o Montana Department of Fish,Wildlife and Parks 1420 East Sixth Avenue Helena, Montana 59601 JUNE 2000 RESTORATION PLAN FOR BULL TROUT IN THE CLARK FORK RIVER BASIN AND KOOTENAI RIVER BASIN, MONTANA This restoration plan for bull trout in Montana was developed collaboratively by, and is supported by, the Montana Bull Trout Restoration Team, appointed by Governor Marc Racicot. Restoration Team members represented the organizations listed below. All parties to this restoration plan recognize that they each have specific statutory responsibilities that cannot be abdicated, particularly with respect to the management and conservation of fish and wildlife, their habitat, and the management, development and allocation of land and water resources. Nothing in this plan is intended to abrogate any of the parties' respective responsibilities. Each party has final approval authority for any activities undertaken as a result of this agreement on the lands owned or administered by them. The Restoration Plan was developed by the Montana Bull Trout Restoration Team, represented by the following organizations and agencies (arranged in alphabetical order by agency/organization): American Fisheries Society Bonneville Power Administration Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation National
    [Show full text]
  • Economics of Columbia River Initiative
    Economics of Columbia River Initiative Final Report to the Washington Department of Ecology and CRI Economics Advisory Committee. Study Team: Daniel Huppert School of Marine Affairs University of Washington Gareth Green Albers School of Business Seattle University William Beyers Department of Geography University of Washington Andrew Subkoviak Department of Economics University of Washington Andrew Wenzl Department of Geography University of Washington January 12, 2004 Executive Summary i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this study is to review the economic effects of increased water use from the Columbia River in the context of Washington State’s Columbia River Initiative (CRI). The CRI is designed to address the legal, scientific, and political issues related to water use from the mainstem of the Columbia River in Washington State. The economic analysis in this report is one of several kinds of information that will be used to inform the Department of Ecology’s rule- making related to the Columbia River. In addition to this review, the State has contracted with the National Academy of Sciences to consider the relationship between water use and the health of salmon populations. This report focuses on the economic consequences of increased water diversions in the mainstem Columbia river in Washington State, including effects on agricultural production, municipal and industrial water supplies, hydropower generation, flood control, river navigation, commercial and recreational fishing, regional impacts, and passive use values. In addition to gauging these effects, the report includes a summary of issues related to the increased use of market transactions in water rights. The analysis is focused on a series of five “Management Scenarios” developed by the Department of Ecology in consultation with water users.
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTH INTERIOR SUBSYSTEM Supersedes SOO 7T-33 Issued 13 October 2020
    BC HYDRO T&D SYSTEM OPERATIONS SYSTEM OPERATING ORDER 7T-33 SOUTH INTERIOR SUBSYSTEM Supersedes SOO 7T-33 issued 13 October 2020 Effective Date: 09 March 2021 Expiry Year: 2025 Original signed by: APPROVED BY: Bob Cielen, Operations Planning Manager, T&D System Operations Requires same day posting on bchydro.com and on BCRC Extranet upon release. Requires same day MRS conveyance notification upon posting Denotes Revision SOO 7T-33 Effective Date: 09 March 2021 Page 2 of 32 SOUTH INTERIOR SUBSYSTEM INDEX 1.0 GENERAL .............................................................................................................................................. 5 2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES .............................................................................................................................. 6 3.0 SYSTEM VOLTAGE CONTROL ........................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Nominal Voltage .............................................................................................................................. 7 3.2 SF6 Switchgear Voltage Ratings ..................................................................................................... 7 3.3 Overvoltage Protection .................................................................................................................... 7 3.4 MCA & REV RMR for Voltage Control ............................................................................................ 7 4.0 SERIES CAPACITORS OPERATIONS ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Orcadians (And Some Shetlanders) Who Worked West of the Rockies in the Fur Trade up to 1858 (Unedited Biographies in Progress)
    Orcadians (and some Shetlanders) who worked west of the Rockies in the fur trade up to 1858 (unedited biographies in progress) As compiled by: Bruce M. Watson 208-1948 Beach Avenue Vancouver, B. C. Canada, V6G 1Z2 As of: March, 1998 Information to be shared with Family History Society of Orkney. Corrections, additions, etc., to be returned to Bruce M. Watson. A complete set of biographies to remain in Orkney with Society. George Aitken [variation: Aiken ] (c.1815-?) [sett-Willamette] HBC employee, British: Orcadian Scot, b. c. August 20, 1815 in "Greenay", Birsay, Orkney, North Britain [U.K.] to Alexander (?-?) and Margaret [Johnston] Aiken (?-?), d. (date and place not traced), associated with: Fort Vancouver general charges (l84l-42) blacksmith Fort Stikine (l842-43) blacksmith steamer Beaver (l843-44) blacksmith Fort Vancouver (l844-45) blacksmith Fort Vancouver Depot (l845-49) blacksmith Columbia (l849-50) Columbia (l850-52) freeman Twenty one year old Orcadian blacksmith, George Aiken, signed on with the Hudson's Bay Company February 27, l836 and sailed to York Factory where he spent outfits 1837-40; he then moved to and worked at Norway House in 1840-41 before being assigned to the Columbia District in 1841. Aiken worked quietly and competently in the Columbia district mainly at coastal forts and on the steamer Beaver as a blacksmith until March 1, 1849 at which point he went to California, most certainly to participate in the Gold Rush. He appears to have returned to settle in the Willamette Valley and had an association with the HBC until 1852. Aiken's family life or subsequent activities have not been traced.
    [Show full text]
  • Dolen, Timothy P
    Historical Development of Durable Concrete for the Bureau of Reclamation Timothy P. Dolen Research Civil Engineer - Senior Technical Specialist Materials Engineering and Research Laboratory Technical Service Center - Denver, Colorado Introduction The Bureau of Reclamation infrastructure stretches across many different climates and environments in the seventeen western states. Many of the dams, spillways, pumping plants, power plants, canals, and tunnels are constructed with concrete. These structures were built from Arizona to Montana, across the plains and in the mountains and deserts. Concrete structures had to remain durable to resist both the design loads and the natural environments of the western climate zones. Many natural environments can be quite destructive to concrete and the earliest Reclamation projects were faced with a variety of durability problems. The state-of-the-art of concrete construction advanced from hand mixing and horse and wagon transporting operations to automated mixing plants, underwater canal construction, and pumping and conveyor placing. This paper first overviews the challenges facing concrete construction in the beginning of the 20th Century. It then traces the Bureau of Reclamation’s role in the development of durable concrete to resist the environments of the west. What is Concrete? Before we begin, we must first understand what is concrete, the most versatile building material. The American Concrete Institute defines concrete as “a composite material that consists essentially of a binding medium within which are embedded particles or fragments of aggregate, usually a combination of fine aggregate and coarse aggregate; in portland-cement concrete, the binder is a mixture of portland cement and water.”1 The earliest concretes date at least as far back as early Roman times including the aqueducts and the historic Pantheon in Rome.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior ,C£$ PftRKSERVIC National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Pla Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not ap property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcatei instructins. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name: American Falls Reservoir Flooded Townsite other name/site number: 2. Location street & number American Falls Reservoir [ ] not for publication city or town American Falls ______ [ X ] vicinity state: Idaho code: ID county: Power code: 077 zip code: 83211 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this [X] nomination [ ] request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36
    [Show full text]