DOCSLIB.ORG

Piney Creek Watershed Plan Included in the Permitting Requirements in Phase II Stormwater Rules

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Piney Creek Watershed Plan Included in the Permitting Requirements in Phase II Stormwater Rules Piney Creek Watershed Plan i Piney Creek Watershed Plan Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................... ii Appendices .................................................................................................................................................... v Tables ............................................................................................................................................................ v Figures ......................................................................................................................................................... vi Photos ........................................................................................................................................................... vi Acronyms and Abbreviations List .............................................................................................................. vii Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................................ ix 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 10 1.1 Purpose ........................................................................................................................................ 10 1.2 Background ................................................................................................................................. 11 1.2.1 History ................................................................................................................................. 13 1.2.2 Geology ............................................................................................................................... 14 Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 14 Hinton Formation ............................................................................................................................ 15 Princeton Sandstone ........................................................................................................................ 15 Bluestone Formation ....................................................................................................................... 15 Pocahontas and New River Formations .......................................................................................... 16 1.2.3 Landuse ............................................................................................................................... 16 1.3 Plan Development ....................................................................................................................... 18 2.0 Pollutant Impairments ..................................................................................................................... 20 3.0 Pollutant Sources ............................................................................................................................ 22 3.1 Fecal Coliform Nonpoint Sources ............................................................................................... 22 3.1.1 On-Site Treatment Systems ................................................................................................ 22 3.1.2 Urban/Residential Runoff ................................................................................................... 25 3.1.3 Agriculture .......................................................................................................................... 26 3.1.4 Natural Background (Wildlife) ........................................................................................... 26 3.2 Metals Nonpoint Sources ............................................................................................................ 27 3.2.1 Abandoned Mine Lands (AML) ......................................................................................... 27 3.2.2 Bond Forfeiture Sites .......................................................................................................... 29 3.3 Iron and Sediment Nonpoint Sources ......................................................................................... 31 3.3.1 Forestry ............................................................................................................................... 31 ii Piney Creek Watershed Plan 3.3.2 Oil and Gas ......................................................................................................................... 31 3.3.3 Roads ................................................................................................................................... 31 3.3.4 Agriculture .......................................................................................................................... 31 3.3.5 Streambank Erosion ............................................................................................................ 31 3.3.6 Other Land-Disturbance Activities ..................................................................................... 32 3.3.7 Background Iron Conditions ............................................................................................... 34 3.4 Fecal Coliform Bacteria Point Sources ....................................................................................... 34 3.4.1 Individual NPDES Permits ................................................................................................. 37 3.4.2 Sewer Leaks and Overflows ............................................................................................... 37 3.4.3 General Sewage Permits ..................................................................................................... 41 3.5 Metals Point Sources ................................................................................................................... 41 3.5.1 Mining Point Sources .......................................................................................................... 44 3.5.2 Industrial Stormwater (Non-Mining) Point Sources ........................................................... 44 3.5.3 Construction Stormwater Permits ....................................................................................... 44 3.6 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) .................................................................... 46 4.0 Required Load Reductions .............................................................................................................. 51 4.1 Fecal Coliform TMDL Load Reductions .................................................................................... 51 4.1.1 Pasture/Cropland Load Reductions .................................................................................... 53 4.1.2 Failing Septic Load Reductions ............................................................................................ 53 4.1.3 Residential Fecal Coliform Load Reductions ....................................................................... 55 4.1.4 MS4 Residential Fecal Coliform Load Reductions ............................................................... 56 4.2 Metals TMDL Load Reductions ................................................................................................. 57 4.2.1 Aluminum Load Reductions ................................................................................................ 59 4.2.2 Iron Load Reductions .......................................................................................................... 59 4.2.3 Stream Bank Erosion Reductions ........................................................................................ 66 5.0 Proposed Management Measures .................................................................................................... 68 5.1 Public Outreach and Education ................................................................................................... 69 5.2 Permit Enforcement .................................................................................................................... 69 5.3 Green Design Projects: Rain Gardens and Porous Pavement ..................................................... 69 5.4 Public Sewer Line Extensions..................................................................................................... 69 5.5 Decentralized/Cluster Sewer Systems ........................................................................................ 69 5.6 Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) Treatment Systems ....................................................................... 70 iii Piney Creek Watershed Plan 5.7 Constructed Treatment Wetlands ................................................................................................ 70 5.8 Stream Restoration ...................................................................................................................... 70 5.9 Best Management Practices ........................................................................................................ 70 6.0 Estimated Load Reductions and Cost ............................................................................................. 77 6.1 Fecal Coliform ............................................................................................................................ 81
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail National Park Service Potomac Heritage District of Columbia/Maryland/Pennsylvania/Virginia U.S
    Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail National Park Service Potomac Heritage District of Columbia/Maryland/Pennsylvania/Virginia U.S. Department of the Interior Parks and Regional Trails Charlestown k To Breezewood To Chambersburg e e r C 522 k l MICHAUX l e i 11IE e R 81 k E r H e E STATE C AK Allegheny L I g e L l A r i NF n g k R ADAMS i a T BUCHANAN C e CLEVELAND FOREST l l n r i i e e T a STATE FOREST r k k r d 70 a e c C COUNTY T i r i FRANKLIN e AKRON NEW YORK S y o e r e L t r v NJ a C Pittsburgh a CITY a BUCHANAN o IC t c INDIANA e N w E s C COUNTY C TRENTON S OH S STATE FOREST u Harrisburg BEDFORD o u d 26 l T e g PA i l COLUMBUS o t a M t e Dayton n i COUNTY FULTON h Philadelphia o L c T Baltimore o Chesapeake MD COUNTY CINCINNATI c Wayne o NF and Ohio WashingtonDOVER D.C. n Canal NHP ANNAPOLIS o WASHINGTON, D.C. Ohi o WV DE k C Shenandoah e George NP GeorgeCAPTAIN JOHN SMITH e FRANKFORT Washington CHESAPEAKE NATIONAL r Harpers Washington C NF L HISTORIC TRAIL Charleston A Ferry Memorial n N IO NHP PKWY PENNSYLVANIA Jefferson T w AVA o KY NF N T MARYLAND Richmond POTOMAC HERITAGE 68 Y NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL Hancock N W NORFOLK IA K To Cumberland ABINGDON H P C INDIAN SPRINGS WILDLIFE A L ge ELIZABETHTON PA id BELLE GROVE MANAGEMENT AREA P R WINSTON- TN Cherokee A BILLMEYER WILDLIFE NF e 68 Great Smoky lu SALEMNC WILDLIFE ail B Raleigh North MANAGEMENT Tr WASHINGTON Mountains NP l Ch Pisgah MANAGEMENT AREA i es OVERMOUNTAIN VICTORY a ap NF MorgantonNATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL AREA R e COUNTY a Nantahala CHARLOTTE CHATTANOOGA k Chattahochee
    [Show full text]
  • Chap 3 Socio-Eco
    City Profile Chapter 3 Socioeconomic enacted legislation forming Raleigh Conditions County from Fayette County and, thus, County government was organized. The An overview and statistical analysis of County was named for Sir Walter Raleigh population and socioeconomic characteris- at the suggestion of General Beckley, and tics of the City of Beckley has been devel- Beckley became the County Seat. As a oped as part of the basis for the Compre- Virginia County, Raleigh County tended hensive Planning process. to politically vote Republican. During the Virginia Secession Convention, at the Historic Roots of outset of the Civil War, Raleigh County was included in the new State of West Beckley Virginia. As the only instance in West The earliest recorded European exploration Virginia history for the territory of a of what is now West Virginia was in 1742 County to be enlarged after its forma- by John Peter Salley. The first explorations tion, the West Virginia Legislature of Raleigh County occurred in 1750 by Dr. approved a political deal to annex the Thomas Walker, and in 1751 by Christo- 168-square mile Slab Fork District and pher Gist of the Ohio Company (a land the rich coal fields of Winding Gulf from investment company). The first known Wyoming County into southwest Raleigh map of the Raleigh County area was County. At the time, this provided a published in London in 1755 based on Democrat majority in Raleigh County these explorations. Two years later, John and a Republican majority in Wyoming James Beckley was born in England, who County. would, in 1795, obtain a grant of 170,038 acres of land in the Raleigh County area, After the construction of the County and, in 1802, be appointed the first Clerk Court House in 1852, some records, of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Overview
    WWeett WWaaddeerrss aanndd BBeeyyoonndd TThhee CCoonnddiittiioonn ooff OOuurr SSttaattee’’ss WWaatteerrss AA CCiittiizzeenn’’ss PPeerrssppeeccttiivvee 1 WV Department of Environmental Protection Division of Water and Waste Management, Nonpoint Section 601 57th Street, SE Charleston, WV 25304 The document was prepared by Tim Craddock, WV DEP’s Citizens’ Monitoring Coordinator and is available electronically in Portable Document Format (PDF). To request your copy send e-mail to Tim Craddock at: [email protected]. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Color photographs provided by: Alana Hartman, DEP’s Potomac Basin Coordinator; Abby Chappel, WV River Network; Sherry Evasic, Blue Heron Environmental Network; Neil Gillies, Cacapon Institute; Suzanne Hubbard, The Mountain Institute; Renee Cain, Lower West Fork Watershed Association; Martin Christ, Friends of Deckers Creek; Bobby Bonnett, Heizer-Manila Watershed Organization; Diana Green, Davis Creek Watershed Association; James Grey, Morris Creek Watershed Association; Larry Orr, Kanawha Valley Chapter of Trout Unlimited; Valerie Wilson, Science Teacher, Oak Hill Catholic Center; Brad Durst, WV Conservation Agency and Curtis Canada, Upper Guyandotte Watershed Association. WV Save Our Streams would like to recognize all the volunteer monitors, not only those directly associated with the program, but any others who have given their time and energy in an effort to protect our state’s streams and rivers. WV Save Our Streams would also like to recognize all of the agency and other partners who have provided assistance of any kind, to help guide volunteers through the myriad of processes involved with water quality issues. “Perception is not acquired by formal education, nor is it reserved for persons learned in the arts or sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathews Maxwell (1809 - 1862)
    Mathews Maxwell (1809 - 1862) MATHEWS 2 MAXWELL was the son of William and Elizabeth Maxwell and was born 10 Oct 1809 in Tazewell, Va 1. He died 11 Apr 1862 in Raleigh County, WVA 2. He married JULIET ANN BROWN 19 Mar 1835 in Giles County, Va 3, she was the daughter of JOHN BROWN and REBECCA PEARIS. She was born 03 Aug 1814 in Mercer County, Va (WV) 4, and died 20 Aug 1896 in Cottageville, Jackson Co, WV 5. Mathews name is spelled with one "t" on his gravestone. It is also spelled Matthews in other sources. Matthews Maxwell is buried in Wildwood Cemetery, Beckley, WVA, tombstone dates are Oct 10, 1809 - April 11, 1862 (Raleigh County Cemeteries, Vol IV, page 53). He died from Typhoid Fever. He lies in the Maxwell plot adjacent to the Beckley plot. Juliet is buried in the Methodist Church Cemetery, Cottageville, WVA 7.. From the "Early Settlers of Raleigh Co. 1840-1850" MAXWELL, Matthews - A native of Tazewell County, Va., he came to the Marshes after living in Mercer County, later settling on Winding Gulf. Five sons, Whitley, Samuel, James, Robert, and John, were Union soldiers. John died in service. A. B. Maxwell of Beckley is the youngest child of Matthews. The "History of Scioto County, 1903 indicates that the family moved from Mercer to Wyoming County in 1847. The "History of Summers County, 1908" "(writing about James A. Maxwell) states that his father (James A.'s) moved from Clover Bottom to the Winding Gulf area (now Raleigh County) when he was 14 (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • West Virginia Trail Inventory
    West Virginia Trail Inventory Trail report summarized by county, prepared by the West Virginia GIS Technical Center updated 9/24/2014 County Name Trail Name Management Area Managing Organization Length Source (mi.) Date Barbour American Discovery American Discovery Trail 33.7 2009 Trail Society Barbour Brickhouse Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.55 2013 Barbour Brickhouse Spur Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.03 2013 Barbour Conflicted Desire Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 2.73 2013 Barbour Conflicted Desire Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.03 2013 Shortcut Barbour Double Bypass Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 1.46 2013 Barbour Double Bypass Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.02 2013 Connector Barbour Double Dip Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.2 2013 Barbour Hospital Loop Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.29 2013 Barbour Indian Burial Ground Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.72 2013 Barbour Kid's Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.72 2013 Barbour Lower Alum Cave Trail Audra State Park WV Division of Natural 0.4 2011 Resources Barbour Lower Alum Cave Trail Audra State Park WV Division of Natural 0.07 2011 Access Resources Barbour Prologue Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.63 2013 Barbour River Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 1.26 2013 Barbour Rock Cliff Trail Audra State Park WV Division of Natural 0.21 2011 Resources Barbour Rock Pinch Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 1.51 2013 Barbour Short course Bypass Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.1 2013 Barbour
    [Show full text]
  • “A People Who Have Not the Pride to Record Their History Will Not Long
    STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE i “A people who have not the pride to record their History will not long have virtues to make History worth recording; and Introduction no people who At the rear of Old Main at Bethany College, the sun shines through are indifferent an arcade. This passageway is filled with students today, just as it was more than a hundred years ago, as shown in a c.1885 photograph. to their past During my several visits to this college, I have lingered here enjoying the light and the student activity. It reminds me that we are part of the past need hope to as well as today. People can connect to historic resources through their make their character and setting as well as the stories they tell and the memories they make. future great.” The National Register of Historic Places recognizes historic re- sources such as Old Main. In 2000, the State Historic Preservation Office Virgil A. Lewis, first published Historic West Virginia which provided brief descriptions noted historian of our state’s National Register listings. This second edition adds approx- Mason County, imately 265 new listings, including the Huntington home of Civil Rights West Virginia activist Memphis Tennessee Garrison, the New River Gorge Bridge, Camp Caesar in Webster County, Fort Mill Ridge in Hampshire County, the Ananias Pitsenbarger Farm in Pendleton County and the Nuttallburg Coal Mining Complex in Fayette County. Each reveals the richness of our past and celebrates the stories and accomplishments of our citizens. I hope you enjoy and learn from Historic West Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Base-Flow Yields of Watersheds in the Berkeley County Area, West Virginia
    Base-Flow Yields of Watersheds in the Berkeley County Area, West Virginia By Ronald D. Evaldi and Katherine S. Paybins Prepared in cooperation with the Berkeley County Commission Data Series 216 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS--the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Evaldi, R.D., and Paybins, K.S., 2006, Base-flow yields of watersheds in the Berkeley County Area, West Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 216, 4 p., 1 pl. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Regulations JANUARY - DECEMBER 2004
    WEST VIRGINIA Fishing Regulations JANUARY - DECEMBER 2004 West Virginia Division of Natural Resources D I Investment in a Legacy --------------------------- S West Virginia’s anglers enjoy a rich sportfishing legacy and conservation ethic that is maintained T through their commitment to our state’s fishery resources. Recognizing this commitment, the R Division of Natural Resources endeavors to provide a variety of quality fishing opportunities to meet I increasing demands, while also conserving and protecting the state’s valuable aquatic resources. One way that DNR fulfills this part of its mission is through its fish hatchery programs. Many anglers are C aware of the successful trout stocking program and the seven coldwater hatcheries that support this T important fishery in West Virginia. The warmwater hatchery program, although a little less well known, is still very significant to West Virginia anglers. O West Virginia’s warmwater hatchery program has been instrumental in providing fishing opportunities F to anglers for more than 60 years. For most of that time, the Palestine State Fish Hatchery was the state’s primary facility dedicated to the production of warmwater fish. Millions of walleye, muskellunge, channel catfish, hybrid striped bass, saugeye, tiger musky, and largemouth F and smallmouth bass have been raised over the years at Palestine and stocked into streams, rivers, and lakes across the state. I A recent addition to the DNR’s warmwater hatchery program is the Apple Grove State Fish Hatchery in Mason County. Construction of the C hatchery was completed in 2003. It was a joint project of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the DNR as part of a mitigation agreement E for the modernization of the Robert C.
    [Show full text]
  • Center for Excellence in Disabilities at West Virginia University, Robert C
    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This publication was made possible by the support of the following organizations and individuals: Center for Excellence in Disabilities at West Virginia University, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center West Virginia Assistive Technology System (WVATS) West Virginia Division of Natural Resources West Virginia Division of Tourism Partnerships in Assistive Technologies, Inc. (PATHS) Special thanks to Stephen K. Hardesty and Brittany Valdez for their enthusiasm while working on this Guide. 1 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .......................................................... 3 • How to Use This Guide ......................................... 4 • ADA Sites .............................................................. 5 • Types of Fish ......................................................... 7 • Traveling in West Virginia ...................................... 15 COUNTY INDEX .......................................................... 19 ACTIVITY LISTS • Public Access Sites ............................................... 43 • Lakes ..................................................................... 53 • Trout Fishing ......................................................... 61 • River Float Trips .................................................... 69 SITE INDEX ................................................................. 75 SITE DESCRIPTIONS .................................................. 83 APPENDICES A. Recreation Organizations ......................................207 B. Trout Stocking Schedule .......................................209
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment: Potomac River Sustainable Flow and Water Resources Analysis
    Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment: Potomac River Sustainable Flow and Water Resources Analysis April 2014 Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment: Potomac River Sustainable Flow and Water Resources Analysis United States Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District The Natural Conservancy Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin Final Report April 2014 Recommended citation: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, The Nature Conservancy, and Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin. 2014. Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment: Potomac River Sustainable Flow and Water Resources Analysis. Final Report. 107 pp. and 11 appendices. Cover photograph: Great Falls on the Potomac River as seen from Virginia. Jim Palmer (ICPRB) Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment Abstract The Middle Potomac River Watershed Assessment (MPRWA) was a collaborative effort to assess the relationship between streamflow alteration and ecological response in the Potomac River and its tributaries in a study area defined as the Middle Potomac. The assessment is comprised of five distinct components: (1) a large river environmental flow needs assessment, (2) a stream and small rivers environmental flow needs assessment, (3) a projection of future water uses, (4) a stakeholder engagement process, and (5) development of a concept or scope for a strategic comprehensive plan for watershed management. This information can be used to balance and mitigate water use conflicts and prevent ecological degradation. To assess flow needs in the Potomac watershed, the Ecologically Sustainable Water Management (ESWM) approach was used for large rivers and the Ecological Limits of Hydrologic Alteration (ELOHA) framework was adapted for streams and small rivers. In the large rivers included in this study, based on currently available information, there has been no discernible adverse ecological impact on focal species due to human modification of flows.
    [Show full text]
  • Easygrants ID: 18868 NFWF/Legacy Grant Project ID: 0603.09.018868
    Easygrants ID: 18868 National Fish and Wildlife Foundation NFWF/Legacy Grant Project ID: 0603.09.018868 Chesapeake Bay Small Watershed Grants 2009 - Submit Final Programmatic Report (Activities) Grantee Organization: Trout Unlimited, Inc. Project Title: Eastern Panhandle Brook Trout Reintroduction (WV) Project Period 10/31/2009 - 12/31/2011 Award Amount $22,309.72 Matching Contributions $22,163.00 Project Location Description (from Proposal) Projects are located in both Districts 1 and 2 in WV. Project Summary (from Proposal) Work with public and private partners to restore water quality and aquatic habitat in four headwater streams of the Cacapon River. Project will install livestock exclusion fencing, establish riparian buffers, and perform water quality monitoring to support the goal of reintroducing eastern brook trout to historical coldwater streams in Hampshire and Hardy Counties, West Virginia. Summary of Accomplishments This Project: a) Restored native vegetation along 3,100 linear feet of streams with an average buffer width of 35 feet (approximately 5 acres); b) Engaged four landowners and 102 volunteers in tree and shrub plantings, educational activities, water quality monitoring, and conservation planning; c) Developed detailed temperature profiles of five streams to and a water quality “snapshot” of Meadow Branch; and d) Piqued WVDNR interest in salmonid restoration or reintroduction in three streams. Lessons Learned Lessons learned include: a) Filling vacancies quickly and planning for project coverage during transition can mitigate the loss of key teammates; b) Tighter oversight of volunteer monitors and interns and regular team meetings would yield more consistent data collection and reporting; c) It is ambitious to make reintroduction of brook trout to previously unstudied streams a project period outcome; d) Brook trout continue to be a valuable focus for landowner outreach (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape and History at the Headwaters of the Big Coal River
    Landscape and History at the Headwaters of the Big Coal River Valley An Overview By Mary Hufford Reading the Landscape: An Introduction “This whole valley’s full of history.” -- Elsie Rich, Jarrold’s Valley From the air today, as one flies westward across West Virginia, the mountains appear to crest in long, undulating waves, giving way beyond the Allegheny Front to the deeply crenulated mass of the coal-bearing Allegheny plateaus. The sandstone ridges of Cherry Pond, Kayford, Guyandotte, and Coal River mountains where the headwaters of southern West Virginia’s Big Coal River rise are the spectacular effect of millions of years of erosion. Here, water cutting a downward path through shale etched thousands of winding hollows and deep valleys into the unglaciated tablelands of the plateaus. Archeologists have recovered evidence of human activity in the mountains only from the past 12,000 years, a tiny period in the region’s ecological development. Over the eons it took to transform an ancient tableland into today’s mountains and valleys, a highly differentiated forest evolved. Known among ecologists as the mixed mesophytic forest, it is the biologically richest temperate-zone hardwood system in the world. And running in ribbons beneath the fertile humus that anchors the mixed mesophytic are seams of coal, the fossilized legacy of an ancient tropical forest, submerged and compressed during the Paleozoic era beneath an inland sea.1 Many of the world’s mythologies explain landforms as the legacies of struggles among giants, time out of mind. Legend accounts for the Giant’s Causeway, a geological formation off the coast of Northern Ireland, as the remains of an ancient bridge that giants made between Ireland and Scotland.
    [Show full text]