DOCSLIB.ORG

Brief Guide to the Atomic Age

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Brief Guide to the Atomic Age University of Central Florida STARS PRISM: Political & Rights Issues & Social Movements 1-1-1945 Brief guide to the atomic age Richard Martin Fagley Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/prism University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Book is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in PRISM: Political & Rights Issues & Social Movements by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Fagley, Richard Martin, "Brief guide to the atomic age" (1945). PRISM: Political & Rights Issues & Social Movements. 826. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/prism/826 I BRIEF GUfDE TO THE ' Richard M. Foqley Brief Guide to The Atomic Age About the Authw Amm ML'FACZBYgraduated from Oberlln Col- lege i 1932 (wlth a Phi Beta uppa kq on I hb watch *I, hc Entaad the Yalt DhMtp j School, whm~in addition to m&hg a mmbk . record ar a student, hc hh writing W. HtisammnbcrofaboutaIlrbeqpuhk onemnthbkofwbprp~abtafnnber worldpwqe,andhe~drracmuchwritbgia . that &Id HL dentilk lIde inter- cDabEea him tp udcmtand- kom than mw the . mcaaing of atamtc pm. At~thtb4ntbcsWottbeF~ .. ' ~#idafChurcbadCM8th~rrrp-.; fng aa the Council's reaetq of the o -on a Juat and Durable Pearr. ~riefGuide to The Atomic Age RICHARD M, FAGLEY m;~16, 1945-that's one date to m memh. It is pmbably.the mat im- J portant date for the past nine- centuri,es, since &e time when Jesus af M-th wras nailed to a ma but tri. umphed owr death, adP group of Il[ie disciples joined in the ht Christian church. It is the date w+ you were plunged into a world sa merent from theoneyouhawknuwnthatitwilltake you and the rest of us yeam just to dfs- cwerthe*efuz. Maybe you were one of those who . Popedthat,whenywgotba&hm~ wars, thinga would be the ame as when pleft. Of~*IIaope~gou~that p are finding the same btloved the--f&,*sarne 9- I I familirrt #ens that. you've k3l dream& ing abut. gut the -Id won't really h the same; it can't be. Something xpew hau ' b'@d, lu,I- that it may affect your lrfe m a thoueand Merit ways,- dthough it mybc mme timb&~ethisnew~~to mnrkes~~eyorramsaeaadfe&L Ifyoamttolteepupwi&Ebffnew world in which gou live, YOU haYC ?heArorkAp~r.mr*CHohaq That wan heday when a little grwp af &miam and soldiers,who XIOW war b;a quation mark a hir hddm 8etd€afairly~bombmsunted.on~ ' ~mwerinNcwMdm's~The explosion dug s huge entar adheated the saad so hot that it melted; it lit up thedy Wghterthmn0anday;it kn&d down men heand a half miles. my;it I ahoofctheearthoverageatkn= The ' steeltowerwwtupinapuffofgaaTbt wasthedaywhenmanfirstsu~in ~thgtbesnur.Thatwastbeday.when *tist8 were kat able to pve thy cottld split atoms in a big way. That was thedaywhentheAmmicAgewaabaaa, Of~~da~haveplayeda pmintPringinginthisneWaa,anda ~mignt~mtrdefaaontosanotber d them as the big by. Tbm&was the day in 18% when Hemi Bapdin ~di~thattbekment~ niumpeldenougba~~to ' makeanhqmdononaphotogapbic pla*m~*Claiesontheit. ssmchfwradiam. There'mthdayin 1905 whai Albert Ehteh h itk Ger- manyLworked out a mathmatiad qw I. tion shaving how mass and energy GUI be eonvd into each other, and what an amalrjnP amount of energy is rqr& sented by a tiny atom so small that no mi-pe ansee it. There was tbe day in 1919 when Ernest Ruthufd in Eng- land, succeded in chipping tbe atom. Danish, French, Italian, German, Rm sian, British, and American dentists db covered new steps on the way to the atom. ic bomb. In 1989 Hahn and S- split the atom wide pen with'stadng mula Them were also August 6 and 8, 1945, when two bbswerc dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, revealing the paning-of atoanic power in warfare. And ! 6 w ~~bercmp),'~otha&~swhenmmd~-' cowx how to slow down alomic expb ! ~ioluenough to put them to pmt- 1 : u&& : : t~km@k~~oto# But July 16,lW islikelytoremain 1 tht big day. That was when amqic power entered the stage of history in a dramatic i way and began to change himory ia., . Everysu~intheunivem,eofaxas ' we&low,ismadeupd~tlIny~,' each of which is equivalent po a latge amount of f3Iqy. w of them are quite dmple; ohare eompliated and ' hvy* Each di&rent '"eltment''4 rn h- iron, gold-has iu own kind of atom. Chemical "compounI," such as water, arc composed of "moledes" in whi& atom of ddfesmt efanenta are ~*(~m~~ofwaterhtwo atomsofhyQrogenandoneofwrygea) ~a~and~are'k~- ingbl*tbatforraall#bs~UndZ recently, it was supped chat atom maM not be .divided-that is, tbe]r wem not 7 thought to h made of anytbing,maW. Man bas gdually Iearned how tu separate and combine the vdm sub. 8- to make nature mehis need& Itbeganwhetlthemvemanmadebiir most irnprtmt dhavmy: how to mak waod bum by rubbing sticks together a anikiqg stones. This first dhmery led step by step to the mdustrioll civilidon in which we live. It tOO). a long time before mao Learned dae.nanymof fire. Atfkahetlsed.it to keep himself warm, and he learneQ how to mt But it mkmany tEbo&h I 8 - , obyears~h~ed~bowrmmt3t mpp" ore and make better W and weapons than Bis chipped m pWx$, . atone in8-ta Sis thwsasd lyeara ' , agotheStmeAgtlqantobesucceded by the Bronze Age; and then about a tb~dyearsbdoreQhrist~&e. - hnAp, which laaOed up until July 16, 1945. ThtoughalltheaeJo~lgpiodsof~ tlaan has becn qarating and -bin- hg atmu and ~1~ in various , ful ways, but he hasn't ldh- tinhered .sPiththe~cs~~ofthuatomit- df,except in alrmaIl way. Now-he has mdddyanuxeedadindoingit. Thatis ' . * L 9 L 1.7 dm. ! why scientists regard this new develop ment as th most important scientific d& #werysiner:manlithisfirstfire. Thatis why we now live in a new age, the Atomic m* Atom an rmll hut mighty Let's look more closely at this mighty midget with which man is kginning to change the world. 'Zook'' is hardly the word, aince we aptsee an atom but can onfy imagine it hmt the way it hhavek 10 Ithbeensaidthat,ifyoublewupa dropobwatcruntil,itwastheskofthc whole mid, then a moWe of wed atoms enlarged to the same degrte would be the ake of an orange, Yet the atom, this ape& of conmumtad power, is not a ~objcct.~thmghiti9itiacm- pwred of parrides much snlauex.,lt morelktwfarsystemsvitha~- sun, or "nudeus," with a positive el-. trid charge, mmaded by di-t particla like planets, ded Earryiag qtivedqp that qual and bahce the charge on the nudeus. The nucleus iMia made up of "proma' d "neutront~'~protans cafig; &e positive dmp. The mumany no charrre, but are part of the weight of the atom. In the case of camin havy ele- ments, such as radium and dum, some of the @des in the nudew tend to flg off at great speed. ?%me el- are "radi~tive." Eimteh'~equation had lhovn what an amazing amount of energy is aam dated with the atomic nudeus. !bme of 11 ciallybykndingprotonaand- out of the nudeu&hbdhg it with bigh@pmiderr,&=aSp tons taat they gat from natd mrrca fmaKampkradiunqorfPomvcry~ genius anid dwica, of which the cyclotron b one.. But these parti& are 4LU charged with electricitp; and since the atom nudeus is similarly the "brtltees" mdygot thmllgh ua them The paoblemwms~~lvedwhenrhcp~~*., . ~farballets,fQrcBep~no The bullet necdtd impwimeni, h& ever, It went rn ktthat it might @ &rough many atomic "soh aptmiis'' be fomitppoddhittbetrvgetaade~~~odt, it. To get the mztximm &, scientists badmfind4'~Iilre~or heavy water, to slow down the neutron b&t, That did it. But bitliom upbillb of atoms hsrd to be aplit to get a dypow&d cg- , plosion. The neutron bulIets, even when slowed down, wouldn't hit enough atom at the metime to produce such a tre- mendous &t. Some forms of uranium provided the amww. When some of these atoms were hit by the neutron%they not only broke up but they also gave off other neutmna that hit many additional atoms, &us statting a chain reaction, like pim of gunpowder exploding one another. -Only this exlplosion waa infinitely greater than he most potent TNT. The two bomb drop* on Jltpamse ah were still in the infant stage. If dam is an- other war, the atomic bombs may ex+ ~pmsmtbombsasmuchasthebIock- buster exceeds the gtenada airmen dropped by hand in World War I. So, fo~bettcrorwrors~, we have mad t@e thPesbold of a new era. How long will it last? The Stone Age lasted £or a thowand cendes, the Brmm Age for more tban twenty centuries, and the Iron I Age fm nearly thirty oenturiee. How long will the Atomic Age endure? It is fitting that the soldier pcialisu who worked on the project wear a quation mark on !- their ahoulder patch. Let us Imk first at the military as- of the problem. General H. H. Arnold, . chief of the Army air form, said at a preus conference the othm day that I&- eu more &dent and effective than the V-2's are coming dong. Over a year ago, he said, bomh were bei guided @rough television by a plane fifteen dmaway. Already there are control devices for heracket bomb in the ex- perimental ~tagethat will make them "home8*simply by reaction to light, heat, or metal in the target. "Use th-" he said,, "with the adcbornbe and the new plan- and you get a Buck conception of war whi4 is right on our thresholb" Cend hldvent on to predica . new atomic bomb "more destructive than the wildat nigh- of the imPgi- don," and rocket8 no powerfut and bt made on targets of a mile aquare or 1- at any part of the wosId., from any guided E+ accumtely chat "exact hi# - partaoftheworId." Thisddmeaa,he .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Making of an Atomic Bomb
    (Image: Courtesy of United States Government, public domain.) INTRODUCTORY ESSAY "DESTROYER OF WORLDS": THE MAKING OF AN ATOMIC BOMB At 5:29 a.m. (MST), the world’s first atomic bomb detonated in the New Mexican desert, releasing a level of destructive power unknown in the existence of humanity. Emitting as much energy as 21,000 tons of TNT and creating a fireball that measured roughly 2,000 feet in diameter, the first successful test of an atomic bomb, known as the Trinity Test, forever changed the history of the world. The road to Trinity may have begun before the start of World War II, but the war brought the creation of atomic weaponry to fruition. The harnessing of atomic energy may have come as a result of World War II, but it also helped bring the conflict to an end. How did humanity come to construct and wield such a devastating weapon? 1 | THE MANHATTAN PROJECT Models of Fat Man and Little Boy on display at the Bradbury Science Museum. (Image: Courtesy of Los Alamos National Laboratory.) WE WAITED UNTIL THE BLAST HAD PASSED, WALKED OUT OF THE SHELTER AND THEN IT WAS ENTIRELY SOLEMN. WE KNEW THE WORLD WOULD NOT BE THE SAME. A FEW PEOPLE LAUGHED, A FEW PEOPLE CRIED. MOST PEOPLE WERE SILENT. J. ROBERT OPPENHEIMER EARLY NUCLEAR RESEARCH GERMAN DISCOVERY OF FISSION Achieving the monumental goal of splitting the nucleus The 1930s saw further development in the field. Hungarian- of an atom, known as nuclear fission, came through the German physicist Leo Szilard conceived the possibility of self- development of scientific discoveries that stretched over several sustaining nuclear fission reactions, or a nuclear chain reaction, centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard G. Hewlett and Jack M. Holl. Atoms
    ATOMS PEACE WAR Eisenhower and the Atomic Energy Commission Richard G. Hewlett and lack M. Roll With a Foreword by Richard S. Kirkendall and an Essay on Sources by Roger M. Anders University of California Press Berkeley Los Angeles London Published 1989 by the University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles, California University of California Press, Ltd. London, England Prepared by the Atomic Energy Commission; work made for hire. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hewlett, Richard G. Atoms for peace and war, 1953-1961. (California studies in the history of science) Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Nuclear energy—United States—History. 2. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission—History. 3. Eisenhower, Dwight D. (Dwight David), 1890-1969. 4. United States—Politics and government-1953-1961. I. Holl, Jack M. II. Title. III. Series. QC792. 7. H48 1989 333.79'24'0973 88-29578 ISBN 0-520-06018-0 (alk. paper) Printed in the United States of America 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 CONTENTS List of Illustrations vii List of Figures and Tables ix Foreword by Richard S. Kirkendall xi Preface xix Acknowledgements xxvii 1. A Secret Mission 1 2. The Eisenhower Imprint 17 3. The President and the Bomb 34 4. The Oppenheimer Case 73 5. The Political Arena 113 6. Nuclear Weapons: A New Reality 144 7. Nuclear Power for the Marketplace 183 8. Atoms for Peace: Building American Policy 209 9. Pursuit of the Peaceful Atom 238 10. The Seeds of Anxiety 271 11. Safeguards, EURATOM, and the International Agency 305 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Trinity Scientific Firsts
    TRINITY SCIENTIFIC FIRSTS THE TRINITY TEST was perhaps the greatest scientifi c experiment ever. Seventy-fi ve years ago, Los Alamos scientists and engineers from the U.S., Britain, and Canada changed the world. July 16, 1945 marks the entry into the Atomic Age. PLUTONIUM: THE BETHE-FEYNMAN FORMULA: Scientists confi rmed the newly discovered 239Pu has attractive nuclear Nobel Laureates Hans Bethe and Richard Feynman developed the physics fi ssion properties for an atomic weapon. They were able to discern which equation used to estimate the yield of a fi ssion weapon, building on earlier production path would be most effective based on nuclear chemistry, and work by Otto Frisch and Rudolf Peierls. The equation elegantly encapsulates separated plutonium from Hanford reactor fuel. essential physics involved in the nuclear explosion process. PRECISION HIGH-EXPLOSIVE IMPLOSION FOUNDATIONAL RADIOCHEMICAL TO CREATE A SUPER-CRITICAL ASSEMBLY: YIELD ANALYSIS: Project Y scientists developed simultaneously-exploding bridgewire detonators Wartime radiochemistry techniques developed and used at Trinity with a pioneering high-explosive lens system to create a symmetrically provide the foundation for subsequent analyses of nuclear detonations, convergent detonation wave to compress the core. both foreign and domestic. ADVANCED IMAGING TECHNIQUES: NEW FRONTIERS IN COMPUTING: Complementary diagnostics were developed to optimize the implosion Human computers and IBM punched-card machines together calculated design, including fl ash x-radiography, the RaLa method,
    [Show full text]
  • Duck and Cover: How Print Media, the U.S. Government, and Entertainment Culture Formedamerica's Understanding of the Atom
    DUCK AND COVER: HOW PRINT MEDIA, THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, AND ENTERTAINMENT CULTURE FORMEDAMERICA’S UNDERSTANDING OF THE ATOM BOMB A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts By Daniel Patrick Wright B.A., University of Cincinnati, 2013 2015 Wright State University WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL May 5, 2015 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Daniel Patrick Wright ENTITLED Duck and Cover: How Print Media, the U.S. Government and Entertainment Culture Formed America’s Understanding of the Atom Bomb BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Arts ________________________________ Jonathan Winkler, Thesis Director ________________________________ Carol Herringer, Chair History Department Committee on College of Liberal Arts Final Examination ________________________________ Drew Swanson, Ph.D. ________________________________ Nancy Garner, Ph.D. ________________________________ Robert E. W. Fyffe, Ph.D. Vice President for Research and Dean of the Graduate School ABSTRACT Wright, Daniel Patrick. M.A. Department of History, Wright State University, 2015. Duck and Cover: How Print Media, the U.S. Government and Entertainment Culture Formed America’s Understanding of the Atom Bomb This research project will explore an overview of the different subsections of American post-war society that contributed to the American “atomic reality” in hopes of revealing how and why the American understanding of atomic weapons did not slowly evolve over the course of a generation, but instead materialize rapidly in the years following the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. By analyzing government sources and programs, print media sources such as newspapers and magazines, and the American entertainment culture of the 1940s and 1950s, this research project will answer exactly why and how the American public arrived at its understanding of the atom bomb.
    [Show full text]
  • The Laboratory of the Atomic Age
    The Laboratory of the Atomic Age Edward Teller ll of us hope that, in the long New Mexico would be an ideal place ongoing liberalism in the old sense run, the energy of the atomic to develop weapons. That remark of the word, that is, an unques- A n nucleus will be used struck me as rather peculiar at the tioned—perhaps even unnoticed— only for peaceful purposes. After a time because it wasn’t until a year tolerance of widely different ideas. half century of nuclear explosives later that Fermi made the final deci- Another remarkable fact about Los and nuclear reactors, the practical sion to emigrate from Fascist Italy Alamos is the uniformity of the effect of the former has been more to the United States. standard of living of its residents. important, both in our thinking and When we arrived in Los Alamos There are no very rich and no very in our expenditures. The existence in late March of 1943, we found a poor. Perhaps this characterization of nuclear weapons has had a decid- striking contrast between the beauti- of Los Alamos sounds too good to ed influence on human affairs. Los ful mountain surroundings and the be true, but I think such praise is Alamos, since its beginnings in dreary, green, barracks-like build- not unfounded. In large part, this March 1943, has been a unique ings in which we were going to live liberal environment is attributable place, distinguished both by its na- and work. Today, nothing is left of to the founder of Los Alamos, ture as a community and its continu- those early structures.
    [Show full text]
  • HISC 111, UCSD, FALL 2011 the Atomic Bomb & the Atomic Age William Clark / [email protected] / Lecture: Tuesdays-Thursdays 5
    HISC 111, UCSD, FALL 2011 The Atomic Bomb & the Atomic Age William Clark / [email protected] / Lecture: Tuesdays-Thursdays 5-6:20 PM, Center Hall 113 Office: 2302 HSS, East Wing / Hours: Tues+Thurs 12-1 & 6:30-7:30 P.M. Philip Clements ([email protected]): Sections & Office Hrs. TBA Audrey Lackner ([email protected]): Sections & Office Hrs. TBA There are no requirements or expected prior knowledge to take this class. You are expected to come to lectures. Grading: Class Participation (15+%) + Midterm (30%) + Final (55%). The class participation 15+% is given automatically to each student, but “bad behavior” (see below) will lead to a loss of some of this per cent of the grade. The midterm and final will consist of in-class short answers and essays. Exams will be based on materials presented in lectures and discussed in sections. You will NOT be examined on readings and videos per se, although they will be of great use in acquiring a depth of knowledge to write the essays. Excepting pace-makers, heating aids, and book-lights. all electronic devices are forbidden in class – use of such devices will severely impact your class participation grade! This means no texting etc. in class. The discussion sections are optional. It is absolutely possible to get an A in the class without attending any sections. But the TAs will play a very big role in formulating the midterm and final essay questions, based on discussions in the sections to be set up: we shall begin setting up the days and times of the sections on Thursday, 22 September, based on input from all the students.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Power Standardization
    NUCLEAR POWER STANDARDIZATION By Robert Zuppert INTRODUCTION America has not ordered a new nuclear power plant since the 1970s. France, by contrast, has built 58 plants in the same period. And today, France gets more than 78 percent of its electricity from safe, clean nuclear power.1 America’s production of nuclear power plants in the United States has been stagnant for nearly 30 years. On the forefront of the failure of the government and private sector to revitalize the nuclear power industry has been the lack of standardization within the licensing, construction and operation of nuclear power plants. The failure to standardize all facets of nuclear power prevented the industry from being able to continue its licensing process following the nuclear accident at Three Mile Island in 1979. “After Three Mile Island (TMI), plants already designed and built, or partially built, incurred additional costs and delays associated with changes resulting from TMI.”2 Throughout this research paper, I will analyze the history of nuclear power and how the lack of a formal standardization process significantly affected the licensing process of nuclear reactors by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). From the early licensing process, I will present why standardization was needed in the nuclear power industry and how the NRC implemented their new standardized licensing process for all nuclear reactors. Following my analysis, I will offer recommendations to help improve the current status of standardization in 1 Bush, George W. “A Secure Energy Future for America.” Nuclear Plant Journal. Vol. 23, Iss. 3 (May/Jun 2005), 42. 2 Blankinship, Steve.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Criticism: Precautionary Reading in an Age of Environmental
    0/-*/&4637&: *ODPMMBCPSBUJPOXJUI6OHMVFJU XFIBWFTFUVQBTVSWFZ POMZUFORVFTUJPOT UP MFBSONPSFBCPVUIPXPQFOBDDFTTFCPPLTBSFEJTDPWFSFEBOEVTFE 8FSFBMMZWBMVFZPVSQBSUJDJQBUJPOQMFBTFUBLFQBSU $-*$,)&3& "OFMFDUSPOJDWFSTJPOPGUIJTCPPLJTGSFFMZBWBJMBCMF UIBOLTUP UIFTVQQPSUPGMJCSBSJFTXPSLJOHXJUI,OPXMFEHF6OMBUDIFE ,6JTBDPMMBCPSBUJWFJOJUJBUJWFEFTJHOFEUPNBLFIJHIRVBMJUZ CPPLT0QFO"DDFTTGPSUIFQVCMJDHPPE Revised Pages RISK CRITICISM Revised Pages Revised Pages Risk Criticism PRECAUTIONARY READING IN AN AGE OF ENVIRONMENTAL UNCERTAINTY Molly Wallace UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN PRESS Ann Arbor Revised Pages Copyright © 2016 by Molly Wallace All rights reserved This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publisher. Published in the United States of America by the University of Michigan Press Manufactured in the United States of America c Printed on acid- free paper 2019 2018 2017 2016 4 3 2 1 A CIP catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Names: Wallace, Molly, author. Title: Risk criticism : precautionary reading in an age of environmental uncertainty / Molly Wallace. Description: Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press, 2016. | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2015038637 | ISBN 9780472073023 (hardback) | ISBN 9780472053025 (paperback) | ISBN 9780472121694 (ebook) Subjects: LCSH: Ecocriticism. | Criticism. | Risk in literature. | Environmental risk assessment. | Risk-taking (Psychology) Classification: LCC PN98.E36 W35 2016 | DDC 809/.93355— dc23 LC record available at http://lccn.loc.gov/2015038637 Revised Pages For my family Revised Pages Revised Pages Acknowledgments This book has been a number of years in the writing, and I am deeply grate- ful for the support and encouragement that I have received along the way.
    [Show full text]
  • The Atomic Age – History 105A - Spring 2007
    The Atomic Age – History 105A - Spring 2007 Instructor: Prof. W. Patrick McCray Time: 9:00 – 9:50 on M-W-F in HSSB 1174 Office and Office Hours: HSSB 4224; Monday and Friday 10-11 or by appointment Phone: 805.893.2665 E-mail: [email protected] COURSE DESCRIPTION: This course examines important aspects of the nuclear era from 1945 to the signing of the first arms treaties between the U.S. and the U.S.S.R in the 1960s. We will also pay some attention to nuclear issues during the Carter-Reagan years. A course on the atomic age could be taught from a number of perspectives – social history, history of technology, the impact of nuclear weapons on military history, the effect of atomic weapons on foreign policy, and so forth. The focus here is on two primary areas – the diverse roles that scientists had during the Atomic Age and the powerful influence nuclear weapons had over American military strategy, politics, and popular culture. TEXTBOOKS: Please purchase the following paperback books. There are also several articles on electronic reserve in the library for you to read. 1. Lawrence Badash, Scientists and the Development of Nuclear Weapons: From Fission to the Limited Test Ban Treaty (ISBN: 1-57392-538-1) 2. Shane Maddock (editor), Problems in American Civilization: The Nuclear Age (ISBN: 0-618-00737-7) 3. Philip Cantelon, Richard Hewlett, and Robert Williams (eds.), The American Atom (Referred to below as ‘CHW’) (ISBN: 0-8122-1354-8) 4. Richard Smoke, National Security and the Nuclear Dilemma (ISBN: 0-07-059352-3) 5.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unsustainable Legacy of the Nuclear Age 1
    The unsustainable legacy of the Nuclear Age 1 The enduring legacy of the Nuclear Age is incompatible with the terrestrial (and human) environment Angelo Baracca Retired Professor of Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Florence, Italy: [email protected] Keywords: Nuclear Age; Anthropocene; nuclear tests; radioactive contamination; health consequences; nuclear waste; spent nuclear fuel; plutonium; uranium mining. In the dispute on the beginning of the Anthropocene it has been proposed, among many, a precise date, July 16th 1945, when the Trinity Test exploded the first atomic bomb in the desert of Alamogordo2, which inaugurated the Nuclear Age. On the other hand, the almost contemporaneous Ecomodernist Manifesto proposed that, among other things, “nuclear fission today represents the only present-day zero-carbon technology with the demonstrated ability to meet most, if not all, of the energy demands of a modern economy.”3 I do not agree with either of these thesis. The Atomic Age has undoubtedly been a tremendous acceleration of the impact of human activities on natural environment, but in my opinion it joined, however it exacerbated, the trend embarked upon since the First Industrial Revolution, when Capitalism adopted radically new (scientific) methods to exploit and “commodise” Nature and its resources. This breakthrough kicked off the development of industrial processes carried out in physical and chemical conditions further and further away from the conditions of the natural environment on Earth surface,
    [Show full text]
  • The Pre-History of Nuclear Development in Pakistan
    Fevered with Dreams of the Future: The Coming of the Atomic Age to Pakistan* Zia Mian Too little attention has been paid to the part which an early exposure to American goods, skills, and American ways of doing things can play in forming the tastes and desires of newly emerging countries. President John F. Kennedy, 1963. On October 19, 1954, Pakistan’s prime minister met the president of the United States at the White House, in Washington. In Pakistan, this news was carried alongside the report that the Minister for Industries, Khan Abdul Qayyum Khan, had announced the establishment of an Atomic Energy Research Organization. These developments came a few months after Pakistan and the United States had signed an agreement on military cooperation and launched a new program to bring American economic advisers to Pakistan. Each of these initiatives expressed a particular relationship between Pakistan and the United States, a key moment in the coming into play of ways of thinking, the rise of institutions, and preparation of people, all of which have profoundly shaped contemporary Pakistan. This essay examines the period before and immediately after this critical year in which Pakistan’s leaders tied their national future to the United States. It focuses in particular on how elite aspirations and ideas of being modern, especially the role played by the prospect of an imminent ‘atomic age,’ shaped Pakistan’s search for U.S. military, economic and technical support to strengthen the new state. The essay begins by looking briefly at how the possibility of an ‘atomic age’ as an approaching, desirable global future took shape in the early decades of the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • NUCLEAR WEAPONS a Very Short Introduction by Joseph M
    NUCLEAR WEAPONS A Very Short Introduction By Joseph M. Siracusa Questions for Thought and Discussion Nuclear Weapons: A Very Short Introduction rests on a single premise: the bomb still matters. Do you agree or disagree? If so, why? If not, why not? Does the spread of nuclear weapons make the world safer or more dangerous? Be specific in your answer. Describe and examine the race to beat the Nazis to the bomb. And why does it matter? The bombings of Hiroshima, and three days later, Nagasaki, were a terrible act of war, but they were no crime. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? And why? Compare and contrast the Baruch Plan and the Gromyko Plan. What were the sticking points? To what extent if any did the Soviet detonation of an atomic device in August 1949 alter the nuclear arms race? What was the purpose of President Ronald Reagan’s missile defence system (SDI)? Was it ever practical or merely a bargaining chip in arms negotiations? The H-bomb really changed everything, transforming the very nature of war and peace. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Be specific. Most scholars agree that the post-Cold War world was decidedly not post-nuclear. Do you agree or disagree? And why? There is a great debate today surrounding the issue of no first use of nuclear weapons. Why is this significant? Why would North Korea want nuclear weapons? And what would it take for them to forego their development? Describe and examine the significance of the 1972 ABM Treaty.
    [Show full text]