Res Publica Constituta: Actium, Apollo and the Accomplishment of The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Res Publica Constituta: Actium, Apollo and the Accomplishment of The Res Publica Constituta: Actium, Apollo and the Accomplishment of the Triumviral Assignment Carsten Hjort Lange, cand.mag. Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2007 i Abstract This thesis will focus on the battle of Actium and the ways in which the Caesarian regime represented and commemorated this conflict and turned it to Octavian/Augustus’s purpose. It will be argued that Actium was relatively more important than Alexandria in the ideology of the regime, but at the same time that the two battles must be understood together, as part of the accomplishment of the assignment of the triumvirate (constituting the res publica to order and ending the civil war). The focus will thus be on the period between 43-27 BC. It will be suggested that the powers given back to the Senate and Roman people in 27 BC were in fact the powers of the triumvirate. The arrangements of 28-27 BC thus constitute the accomplishment of the triumviral assignment. It will be stressed that, according to the regime, Apollo had a major role to play in this development, helping Octavian to win the battle of Actium. There are many possible themes that could have been exploited, but the nexus of Actium, Apollo, civil war and peace all centre round the triumvirate and triumviral assignment. There is a generally held consensus amongst scholars that Actium was presented as a foreign war and that Octavian/Augustus tried to conceal that it was in fact a civil war. This thesis will reflect on the issue and challenge this consensus. Antonius decided to make war on his own country and thus a foreign war turned into a civil war. Similarly, it is more or less universally held that the battle of Actium was decided due to a prearranged battle plan by Antonius and Cleopatra; from the outset they wanted to flee. Instead it will be argued that it is much more likely that the battle was decided by Cleopatra’s treachery. ii Dedication My parents, for all their support, Marlene, for giving me the little nudge out of the door and in memory of my sister Rene and my father Knud iii Acknowledgements I have been extremely fortunate to have a supervisor with whom I share my interest and passion for the ‘Augustan’ age. John Rich’s guidance has been invaluable and it is difficult to see how anybody working on my subject could get a more suited supervisor. His encouragement, support, criticism and willingness to listen made this possible. His influence will be visible to the informed reader throughout these pages. But of course, the faults that remain are my own. Several other academics have lent their assistance doing the three years. I would like to thank Jacob Isager, who introduced me to Gurval’s book many years ago and has helped in numerous ways, especially on Nicopolis and Apollo. The Department of Classics, University of Nottingham, especially Katharina Lorenz and Lisa Trentin for helping with questions on art history and Kyriaki Konstantinidou. I would also like to thank my former MA supervisor Jesper Carlsen, Ittai Gradel and Konstantinos Zachos, Director of the 12 th Ephorate of Prehistoric and Classical Antiquities, for allowing me access to the victory monument of Octavian at Actium. Also thanks to Ed Bragg for agreeing to let me talk about the Res Gestae at the “Beyond the Battlefields of the Graeco-Roman World” at Oxford, and my department and the CA 2006 at Newcastle for the possibility to test my ideas on the victory monument of Octavian at Actium. Furthermore, James Moore and Ian Macgregor Morris for the opportunity to participate in the colloquium “Making History. Writing the History of the Ancient World in the Long Eighteenth Century. A Colloquium at the Institute of Historical Research”, talking about the battle of Actium. I have been very privileged to get funding from the AHRC and a Studentship from the School of Humanities, University of Nottingham, for which I am immensely grateful. I would also like to thank the Thomas Wiedemann Memorial Fund for two generous awards and Knud Højgaards Fund, Denmark, also for two generous awards, one allowing me to visit Actium and Nicopolis. Many friends and individuals have contributed in numerous ways, but space permits me to mention only a few. Without Andrew Bayliss and Ian Macgregor Morris my stay in Nottingham would have been far less enjoyable. Drinking coffee and complaining has become an art form. I owe them thanks both for their professional eye and their friendship. A constant help and a good friend, a soul-mate, I have had in Jesper Madsen. Also thanks to Jonny Trapp Steffensen for words of encouragement. Special thanks must go to me ex-wife Marlene Rosemarie Madsen; without her I would never have moved to England. For that and for all her support I owe her everything. And also many thanks to my family, past and present, for all their support. Finally, and most importantly, my parents, Knud Hjort Lange and Annelise Lange, who have supported me throughout the years and in numerous ways; without their support and trust in my abilities, this would have been very difficult indeed. Mange tak. iv List of Contents Abstract page ii Dedication page iii Acknowledgement page iv Lists of Contents page v List of Illustrations page viii Abbreviations page x Chapter 1: Introduction page 1 Chapter 2: The Triumvirate page 19 2.1: The champion of the res publica : Octavian’s political beginnings page 20 2.2: The triumviral assignment page 24 2.3: The renewal of the triumvirate page 34 2.4: Apollo and Octavian: the origins of a divine relationship page 38 2.5: Sextus Pompeius and the accomplishment of the triumviral assignment page 47 2.6: Conclusion page 53 Chapter 3: Approach to War page 56 3.1: The breakdown of a ‘friendship’ page 56 3.2: The end of the triumvirate page 62 3.3: Endgame: the year 32 BC page 68 3.4: Bellum Externum, Bellum Civile page 80 3.5: Actium as a civil war page 84 3.6: Conclusion page 95 v Chapter 4: Bellum Actiacum Alexandrinumque page 98 4.1: The historical tradition page 101 4.2: Horace and Actium: the odd one out? page 103 4.3: Antonius’ intentions going into battle: ideology and what really happened page 108 4.4: A glorious victory without much fighting: less than 5,000 dead page 125 4.5: From Actium to Alexandria page 130 4.6: Actium and Alexandria: one or two wars? page 134 4.7: Conclusion page 138 Chapter 5: Onsite Commemorations of the Battle of Actium page 142 5.1: Two victory cities page 143 5.2: Nicopolis and the victory monument: the literary evidence page 146 5.3: The new city of Nicopolis and the temple of Actian Apollo page 149 5.4: The victory monument and its inscription page 158 5.5: A Roman monument at a Greek city page 170 5.6: The victory monument and its gods page 177 5.7: Conclusion: the victory monument and Augustan ideology page 182 Chapter 6: Waiting for Caesar page 187 6.1: Honouring the absent victor: Dio 51.19.1-20.5 page 187 6.2: Victory festivals page 195 6.3: ‘ Damnatio memoriae ’: dishonouring Antonius page 200 6.4: The temple of Janus page 205 vi 6.5: The triple triumph of 29 BC page 216 6.6: Conclusion page 226 Chapter 7: Res publica constituta page 229 7.1: The reshaping of the Forum Romanum page 230 7.2: Apollo Palatinus and Actium page 239 7.3: The constitution of the Res publica : the settlement of 28-27 BC page 260 7.4: Conclusion page 270 Chapter 8: Conclusion page 273 Bibliography page 290 vii List of Illustrations Figure 1: Map of the Campus Martius in Augustan times page 8 Figure 2: Map of Actium page 98 Figure 3: Map of battle plan Actium page 118 Figure 4: Map showing the synoecism of Nicopolis page 150 Figure 5: View from the Victory Monument at Actium towards Nicopolis and view of the monument from the plain below page 158 Figure 6: Reconstructions of the Victory Monument at Actium page 160 Figure 7: The Victory Monument at Actium in its current state of preservation page 162 Figure 8: Reconstruction of the upper terrace of the Victory Monument at Actium page 163 Figure 9: Semicircular base showing Apollo with lyre and eleven other gods page 164 Figure 10: Triumphal chariot from the monumental altar, from the monumental altar of the Victory Monument at Actium page 165 Figure 11: Reconstruction of ram inserted in lower terrace wall of the Victory Monument at Actium page 166 Figure 12: The Inscription of the Victory Monument at Actium today page 168 Figure 13: The temple of Janus on reverse of coin of Nero page 206 Figure 14: Map of Forum Romanum Augustan times AD 10 page 231 Figure 15: Coin of the Curia page 233 Figure 16: Terracotta plaque showing Hercules and Apollo viii fighting over the tripod page 248 Figure 17: Terracotta plaque showing a baetyl page 253 Figure 18: Denarius of C. Antistius Vetus page 255 Figure 19: The Sorrento base page 258 Figure 20: A new aureus of Octavian page 262 Figure 21: Cistophorus of Octavian from Asia, 28 BC, the reverse legend shows a personification of Pax page 265 ix Abbreviations AJA American Journal of Archaeology AJP American Journal of Philology ARW Aufstieg und iedergang der römischen Welt BABesch Bulletin Antieke Beschaving (Annual Papers on Classical Archaeology) BICS Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies BMC Mattingly, H., Coins of the Roman Empire in the British Museum , vol.1 and vol.3 (London 1923/1936) CAH The Cambridge Ancient History CIL Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum CQ The Classical Quarterly CR The Classical Review EJ Ehrenberg, V.
Recommended publications
  • II DIVA ANGERONA Everyone Knows How Often Both in Ancient and More
    II DIVA ANGERONA Everyone knows how often both in ancient and more recent times scholars have attempted to interpret the nature and name of the goddess Angerona. And yet to me we seem to have made hardly any progress in this attempt. Aust 1 and Wissowa 2 have collected the relevant passages from ancient authors and other documents which I think it unnecessary to copy out. Neither the disease of angitia nor 'worries to be dispelled,' as urged on us by the ancients, are of any help towards an interpretation. Mommsen 3 thought Angerona was a goddess in charge of the New Year. He sought to derive the name from angerendum, &1to 't'ou &voccpepea6ocL 't'Ov ~A.Lov. The explanation was accepted by Wissowa but rightly rejected by others (Walde-Hofmann s.v. 'ganz unwahrscheinlich'). Recently Eva Fiesel 4 and Altheim 6 have sought an Etruscan origin for the name and connected it with the gentilitial name anx.arie, ancarie, anx.aru, ancaru. The suggestion is rejected by Vetter,8 and I cannot agree with it either. To the arguments offered by Vetter I can add the following. First, the derivatives in Latin of Etruscan names ending in -u usually end in -onius not -onus. 7 Secondly, the name Angerona seems to fit very well into a large series of such names belonging to truly Roman (or Sabine) goddesses. First of all we have Abeonam, Adeonam, Intercidonam, all 1 RE I, 2I8gff. 1 Rosch. Lex. I, 348ff; Rel. u. Kult.• 24I. 8 CIL I p. 409. ' Language II (1935) 122ff.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Art in Motion Studies in Honour of Sir John Boardman ​On the Occasion of His 90Th Birthday
    Greek Art in Motion Studies in honour of Sir John Boardman on the occasion of his 90th birthday edited by Rui Morais, Delfim Leão, Diana Rodríguez Pérez with Daniela Ferreira Archaeopress Archaeology © Archaeopress and the authors, 2019. Archaeopress Publishing Ltd Summertown Pavilion 18-24 Middle Way Summertown Oxford OX2 7LG www.archaeopress.com ISBN 978 1 78969 023 1 ISBN 978 1 78969 024 8 (e-Pdf) © Archaeopress and the individual authors 2019 Cover: Head of Alexander in profile. Tourmaline intaglio, 25 x 25 mm, Ashmolean (1892.1499) G.J. Chester Bequest. Photo: C. Wagner. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. Printed in England by Oxuniprint, Oxford This book is available direct from Archaeopress or from our website www.archaeopress.com © Archaeopress and the authors, 2019. Contents Preface ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������1 John Boardman and Greek Sculpture �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������3 Olga Palagia Sanctuaries and the Hellenistic Polis: An Architectural Approach �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������14 Milena Melfi ‘Even the fragments, however, merit scrutiny’: Ancient
    [Show full text]
  • AMBRACIA If You Are in Picturesque Arta, You Will Not Need to Travel to Visit Glorious Ambracia of Ancient Times
    AMBRACIA If you are in picturesque Arta, you will not need to travel to visit glorious Ambracia of ancient times. It is at your feet. Of course modern buildings hide a large part of its magnificence. The rest is sufficient however, as it is just as attractive and significant. King Pyrrhus of Epirus should have loved Ambracia, maybe because it was the most important Corinthian colony after Kerkyra (Corfu). He held the Corinthians in great regard for their commercial prowess and the economic policy of expansion they practiced. In 625 BC Corinthian colonials had followed Gorgon, the illegitimate son of the tyrant of Corinth Kypselos, and settled on FOLLOW A ROUTE TO HISTORY the banks of the River Arachthos, where beautiful Arta lies today. Their settlement was part of an intelligent plan conceived by the Kypselides to build colonies and commercial and naval posts in appropriate positions, in order to dominate the West by monopolizing trade, the driving force of the economy. This is why we will find them in Lefkada, Corfu, Epidamnus etc. Gorgos and the Corinthian colonials pushed out of the region the Dryopes, but retained the name of the place which, according to mythology, is attributed to Ambracus, son of Thesprotos or to Ambracia, daughter of Melaneas, King HELLENIC REPUBLIC of the Dryopes. Ministry of Culture and Sports Ιoannina EPHORATE OF ANTIQUITIES OF ARTA Pedini Mary Beloyianni, Ιgoumenitsa Paramythia Plataria Phd. Archaeologist, Greek language teacher Responsible for educational programs of Diazoma Association language teacher Responsible for educational programs Greek Phd. Archaeologist, Sivota Perdika Margariti Parga Ammoudia Kanallaki Filipiada Louros Arta Nea Kerasounta Ambracia Kostakioi Dodona Gitana Archagelos Aneza Kanali Cassope Nicopolis Mitikas Preveza This small theatre, dating to the end of A few parts of this theatre have been the 4th – beginning of the 3rd century revealed (most of it is under adjacent buildings BC, is interesting because it was not built and the surface of the present road).
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Review/La Revue Historique
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by National Documentation Centre - EKT journals The Historical Review/La Revue Historique Vol. 7, 2010 The Port of Messolonghi: Spatial Allocation and Maritime Expansion in the Eighteenth Century Papakonstantinou Katerina Ionian University http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/hr.265 Copyright © 2010 To cite this article: Papakonstantinou, K. (2011). The Port of Messolonghi: Spatial Allocation and Maritime Expansion in the Eighteenth Century. The Historical Review/La Revue Historique, 7, 277-297. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/hr.265 http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 11/01/2020 02:12:57 | THE PORT OF MESSOLONGHI: SPATIAL ALLOCATION AND MARITIME EXPANSION IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY Katerina Papakonstantinou Abstract: The main argument of this paper is that the spatial allocation of economic activity was reflected in shipping activities in the Eastern Mediterranean. Different but geographically near areas developed interwoven economic activities. In that sense this paper examines the economic relations among the merchant marine of Messolonghi, a small port in western Greece, the exporting port of Preveza in Epirus and the needs of Malta and Livorno for certain goods during the eighteenth century. Messolonghi, Preveza and Malta formed a triangle of commercial activities based on the different requirements and potential of each area: in products, people, capital and vessels. The rise of the Greek merchant marine is dated to the beginning of the eighteenth century.1 While 100 years later, during the Greek Revolution of the years 1821-1830, the fleets from the islands in the Aegean, namely Hydra, Spetses and Psara, became famous for their participation in the war, at the beginning of the eighteenth century it was the ships from the Ionian that visited Western Mediterranean ports.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae for WM Murray
    William M. Murray Page 1 Curriculum Vitae WILLIAM M. MURRAY Mary and Gus Stathis Endowed Assoc. Prof. of Greek History Executive Director, Interdisciplinary Center for Hellenic Studies University of South Florida 4202 E Fowler Ave., SOC 107, Tampa, FL 33620-8100 [email protected] __________ EDUCATION 1970-74: B.A. (with highest distinction, ΦBK) in History, The Pennsylvania State University. 1973: Summer Session II, American School of Classical Studies at Athens, Greece. 1978-80: Regular Member and Vanderpool Fellow, American School of Classical Studies at Athens, Greece. 1974-82: Ph.D. in Ancient History, University of Pennsylvania (Doctoral Dissertation: The Coastal Sites of Western Akarnania: A Topographical-Historical Survey; Readers: A.J. Graham, N.G.L. Hammond, J.D. Muhly). __________ TEACHING/RESEARCH APPOINTMENTS Lecturer, University of Pennsylvania: 1977, 1981-82. Assistant Professor, University of South Florida: 1982-86. Gertrude Smith Professor (Director of Summer Session), American School of Classical Studies at Athens: 1986. Associate Professor, University of South Florida: 1987-present. Whitehead Visiting Professor, American School of Classical Studies at Athens: 1995-96. Maurice Hatter Distinguished Visiting Professor, University of Haifa: 1997 (summer). Mary and Gus Stathis Endowed Associate Professor of Greek History: 2000 to present. __________ AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION Greek History and Archaeology, the History and Archaeology of Northwestern Greece, Ancient Greek and Roman Naval History, Ancient Seafaring, Nautical Archaeology. __________ PUBLICATIONS: Monographs and Major Research Tools 1. Octavian's Campsite Memorial for the Actian War, Vol. 79, part 4 of Transactions of the American Philosophical Society (Philadelphia, 1989). 2. "Epirus-Acarnania," in R.J.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Heads Or Tails
    Heads or Tails Representation and Acceptance in Hadrian’s Imperial Coinage Name: Thomas van Erp Student number: S4501268 Course: Master’s Thesis Course code: (LET-GESM4300-2018-SCRSEM2-V) Supervisor: Mw. dr. E.E.J. Manders (Erika) 2 Table of Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................ 5 Figure 1: Proportions of Coin Types Hadrian ........................................................................ 5 Figure 2: Dynastic Representation in Comparison ................................................................ 5 Figure 3: Euergesia in Comparison ....................................................................................... 5 Figure 4: Virtues ..................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 5: Liberalitas in Comparison ...................................................................................... 5 Figure 6: Iustitias in Comparison ........................................................................................... 5 Figure 7: Military Representation in Comparison .................................................................. 5 Figure 8: Divine Association in Comparison ......................................................................... 5 Figure 9: Proportions of Coin Types Domitian ...................................................................... 5 Figure 10: Proportions of Coin Types Trajan .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Graham Jones
    Ni{ i Vizantija XIV 629 Graham Jones SEEDS OF SANCTITY: CONSTANTINE’S CITY AND CIVIC HONOURING OF HIS MOTHER HELENA Of cities and citizens in the Byzantine world, Constantinople and its people stand preeminent. A recent remark that the latter ‘strove in everything to be worthy of the Mother of God, to Whom the city was dedicated by St Constantine the Great in 330’ follows a deeply embedded pious narrative in which state and church intertwine in the city’s foundation as well as its subse- quent fortunes. Sadly, it perpetuates a flawed reading of the emperor’s place in the political and religious landscape. For a more nuanced and considered view we have only to turn to Vasiliki Limberis’ masterly account of politico-religious civic transformation from the reign of Constantine to that of Justinian. In the concluding passage of Divine Heiress: The Virgin Mary and the Creation of Christianity, Limberis reaffirms that ‘Constantinople had no strong sectarian Christian tradition. Christianity was new to the city, and it was introduced at the behest of the emperor.’ Not only did the civic ceremonies of the imperial cult remain ‘an integral part of life in the city, breaking up the monotony of everyday existence’. Hecate, Athena, Demeter and Persephone, and Isis had also enjoyed strong presences in the city, some of their duties and functions merging into those of two protector deities, Tyche Constantinopolis, tutelary guardian of the city and its fortune, and Rhea, Mother of the Gods. These two continued to be ‘deeply ingrained in the religious cultural fabric of Byzantium..
    [Show full text]
  • Between the Cults of Syria and Arabia: Traces of Pagan Religion at Umm Al-Jimål
    !"#$%&"%'#(")*%+!"$,""-%$."%/01$)%23%45#(6%6-&%7#68(69%:#6;")%23%<6=6-%>"1(=(2-%6$% % ?@@%61AB(@61*C%!"#$%&'(%)("*&(+%'",-.(/)$(0-1*/&,2,3.(,4(5,-$/)(6D%7@@6-9% % E"F6#$@"-$%23%7-$(G0($(")%23%B2#&6-%HIJJKL9%MNNAMKMD% Bert de Vries Bert de Vries Department of History Calvin College Grand Rapids, MI 49546 U.S.A. Between the Cults of Syria and Arabia: Traces of Pagan Religion at Umm al-Jimål Introduction Such a human construction of religion as a so- Umm al-Jimål ’s location in the southern Hauran cial mechanism to achieve security does not pre- puts it at the intersection of the cultures of Arabia to clude the possibility that a religion may be based the south and Syria to the north. While its political on theological eternal verities (Berger 1969: 180- geography places it in the Nabataean and Roman 181). However, it does open up the possibility of an realms of Arabia, its cultural geography locates it archaeology of religion that transcends the custom- in the Hauran, linked to the northern Hauran. Seen ary descriptions of cult centers and cataloguing of on a more economic cultural axis, Umm al-Jimål altars, statues, implements and decorative elements. is between Syria as Bilåd ash-Shåm, the region of That is, it presupposes the possibility of a larger agricultural communities, and the Badiya, the re- interpretive context for these “traces” of religion gion of pastoral nomad encampments. Life of soci- using the methodology of cognitive archaeology. ety on these intersecting axes brought a rich variety The term “traces” is meant in the technical sense of economic, political and religious cross-currents of Assmann’s theory of memory (2002: 6-11).
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: Missing Years
    Cambridge University Press 0521855829 - Caesar’s Legacy: Civil War and the Emergence of the Roman Empire Josiah Osgood Excerpt More information Introduction: missing years As a youth, the future emperor Claudius set out to write the recent history of Rome and, with initial encouragement from Livy, then the greatest living historian, produced an account that began with the assassination of Julius Caesar. Some were less supportive. Claudius’ mother, Antonia, and grandmother, Livia, repeatedly criticized his efforts; he could not write as frankly as he wished. Thus warned, Claudius left in his final version the assassination and its immediate aftermath, but omitted everything that 1 happened in the civil wars that followed: an eloquent silence. This book is in one sense an effort to recover what Claudius left out and why. Its reader will have to face up to the killing squads, the land confiscations, the famine, the propaganda, the agonizing dilemmas of these years. But I have not set out to write the kind of political narrative Claudius would have produced. For if the emperor has been one inspiration, another has been Vergil, whose first and ninth Eclogues exemplify how civil war swept through the lives of ordinary Italians during Claudius’ missing years. My work too aims to retrieve the men and women who fought and endured the bloody struggles that beset the Roman world under the triumvirate of Mark Antony, Octavian, and Lepidus. It is all too easy in writing about these years to focus only on high politics and constitutional questions, and the results become depressingly top-heavy.
    [Show full text]
  • 11Ffi ELOGIA of the AUGUSTAN FORUM
    THEELOGIA OF THE AUGUSTAN FORUM 11ffi ELOGIA OF THE AUGUSTAN FORUM By BRAD JOHNSON, BA A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts McMaster University © Copyright by Brad Johnson, August 2001 MASTER OF ARTS (2001) McMaster University (Classics) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: The Elogia of the Augustan Forum AUTHOR: Brad Johnson, B.A. (McMaster University), B.A. Honours (McMaster University) SUPERVISOR: Dr. Claude Eilers NUMBER OF PAGES: v, 122 II ABSTRACT The Augustan Forum contained the statues offamous leaders from Rome's past. Beneath each statue an inscription was appended. Many of these inscriptions, known also as elogia, have survived. They record the name, magistracies held, and a brief account of the achievements of the individual. The reasons why these inscriptions were included in the Forum is the focus of this thesis. This thesis argues, through a detailed analysis of the elogia, that Augustus employed the inscriptions to propagate an image of himself as the most distinguished, and successful, leader in the history of Rome. III ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my supervisor, Dr. Claude Eilers, for not only suggesting this topic, but also for his patience, constructive criticism, sense of humour, and infinite knowledge of all things Roman. Many thanks to the members of my committee, Dr. Evan Haley and Dr. Peter Kingston, who made time in their busy schedules to be part of this process. To my parents, lowe a debt that is beyond payment. Their support, love, and encouragement throughout the years is beyond description.
    [Show full text]
  • The Imperial Cult and the Individual
    THE IMPERIAL CULT AND THE INDIVIDUAL: THE NEGOTIATION OF AUGUSTUS' PRIVATE WORSHIP DURING HIS LIFETIME AT ROME _______________________________________ A Dissertation presented to the Faculty of the Department of Ancient Mediterranean Studies at the University of Missouri-Columbia _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy _____________________________________________________ by CLAIRE McGRAW Dr. Dennis Trout, Dissertation Supervisor MAY 2019 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled THE IMPERIAL CULT AND THE INDIVIDUAL: THE NEGOTIATION OF AUGUSTUS' PRIVATE WORSHIP DURING HIS LIFETIME AT ROME presented by Claire McGraw, a candidate for the degree of doctor of philosophy, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. _______________________________________________ Professor Dennis Trout _______________________________________________ Professor Anatole Mori _______________________________________________ Professor Raymond Marks _______________________________________________ Professor Marcello Mogetta _______________________________________________ Professor Sean Gurd DEDICATION There are many people who deserve to be mentioned here, and I hope I have not forgotten anyone. I must begin with my family, Tom, Michael, Lisa, and Mom. Their love and support throughout this entire process have meant so much to me. I dedicate this project to my Mom especially; I must acknowledge that nearly every good thing I know and good decision I’ve made is because of her. She has (literally and figuratively) pushed me to achieve this dream. Mom has been my rock, my wall to lean upon, every single day. I love you, Mom. Tom, Michael, and Lisa have been the best siblings and sister-in-law. Tom thinks what I do is cool, and that means the world to a little sister.
    [Show full text]
  • Marking Scheme IM Classical Studies
    MATSEC Examinations Board Marking Scheme IM Classical Studies Special September Session 2020 Marking Scheme (Special September Session 2020): IM Classical Studies Marking schemes published by the MATSEC Examination Board are not intended to be standalone documents. They are an essential resource for markers who are subsequently monitored through a verification process to ensure consistent and accurate application of the marking scheme. In the case of marking schemes that include model solutions or answers, it should be noted that these are not intended to be exhaustive. Variations and alternatives may also be acceptable. Examiners must consider all answers on their merits, and will have consulted with the MATSEC Examinations Board when in doubt. Page 1 of 13 Marking Scheme (Special September Session 2020): IM Classical Studies A. SECTION A: HISTORY Answer EITHER Question 1 OR 2. 1. In around 350 words, critically discuss the military and cultural effects which resulted from the Greek victory of the Persian wars. (20) As a result of the allied Greek success, a large contingent of the Persian fleet was destroyed and all Persian garrisons were expelled from Europe, marking an end of Persia’s advance westward into the continent. The cities of Ionia were also liberated from Persian control. Despite their successes, however, the spoils of war caused greater inner conflict within the Hellenic world. The violent actions of Spartan leader Pausanias at the siege of Byzantium, for instance, alienated many of the Greek states from Sparta, and led to a shift in the military command of the Delian League from Sparta to Athens. This set the stage for Sparta’s eventual withdrawal from the Delian League.
    [Show full text]