Arizona: 2010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Arizona: 2010 ARIZONA Counties 115° 114° 113° 112° 111° 110° 109° COLORADO UTAH 37° 37° 0 10 20 30 Kilometers 0 10 20 30 Miles NEVADA 36° 36° COCONINO MOHAVE APACHE NAVAJO 35° 35° YAVAPAI CALIFORNIA NEW MEXICO 34° 34° LA PAZ GILA MARICOPA GREENLEE 33° 33° PINAL GRAHAM YUMA 32° PIMA 32° COCHISE LEGEND MEXICO International UTAH State MEXICO SANTA CRUZ GILA County Note: All boundaries and names are as of January 1, 2010. 31° 31° 115° 114° 113° 112° 111° 110° 109° Maps Arizona E-1 U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census Geographic Areas Reference Map Legend, Section Locator, and Location Index Geographic Areas Reference Map Legend International ROME Incorporated Place American Indian Reservation Zena Census Designated Place CAMPO (Federal)1 Large River, Lake, Water Body, ZIA Off-Reservation Trust Land1 Lake Erie or Shoreline A fishhook joins contiguous and/or discontiguous State parts of the same geographic entity. ERIE County SEE INSET A Inset YORK County Subdivision 1 A ’ * ’ following an American Indian area name indicates that tribal subdivisions are defined for that area. The tribal subdivision boundaries are displayed on the tribal subdivision map(s) immediately following the geographic areas reference maps. Note: All legal and statistical area boundaries and names are as of January 1, 2010. Where international, state, county, independent city, and/or county subdivision boundaries coincide, the map shows the boundary symbol for the highest level of these geographic entities. The county and independent city boundaries are always shown. Where a county subdivision boundary symbol coincides with a place boundary, the map does not show the place boundary symbol. Where American Indian Reservation (Federal), American Indian Reservation (State), State Designated Tribal Statistical Area, and/or Tribal Designated Statistical Area boundaries coincide with a county subdivision boundary, the map does not show the county subdivision boundary symbol. Any geographic entity name may include ’(pt)’ if some portion of the entity extends beyond the limits of the map area displayed on the page, or if multiple discontiguous pieces of the entity have been discretely labeled on the page. A geographic entity name may include ’(pts)’ if many discontiguous pieces exist for that entity that cannot be discretely labeled. The boundaries shown on this map are for Census Bureau statistical data collection and tabulation purposes only; their depiction and designation for statistical purposes does not constitute a determination of jurisdictional authority or rights of ownership or entitlement. Section Locator COCONINO MOHAVE APACHE 1 2 NAVAJO 3 YAVAPAI LA PAZ GILA GREENLEE 5 MARICOPA 4 PINAL GRAHAM YUMA 7 6 PIMA COCHISE LEGEND ADAMS County SANTA CRUZ 1 Map Section E-2 Arizona Maps U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census Geographic Areas Reference Map Legend, Section Locator, and Location Index County Location Index This list presents the map section numbers for each county in the state. Map section numbers refer to the geographic areas reference maps only. COUNTY MAP SEC Apache 3 Cochise 7 Coconino 2 Gila 4 Graham 7 Greenlee 7 La Paz 5 Maricopa 4 Mohave 1 Navajo 3 Pima 6 Pinal 4 Santa Cruz 6 Yavapai 2 Yuma 5 Maps Arizona E-3 U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census American Indian Areas, Counties, County Subdivisions, and Places - Section 1 115° 114° 113° 112° 37° COLORADO CITY 37° Beaver Dam KAIBAB Centennial Park Littlefield Cane Beds (pt) Moccasin Kaibab Scenic NORTH MOHAVE Lake Mead Grand Canyon West 36° Meadview 36° HUALAPAI (pts) White Hills HUALAPAI (pt) KINGMAN Peach Dolan Springs Springs MOHAVE Truxton Chloride Valle Antares Crozier Vista Valentine SEE SECTION 2 Clacks Canyon Hackberry HUALAPAI (pt) So-Hi Katherine New Kingman-Butler Golden KINGMAN Valley McConnico Pinion Pines Walnut Creek Lazy Y U BULLHEAD CITY Pine Lake Fort 35° Mohave Oatman BULLHEAD CITY Mesquite Creek 35° Mojave Ranch Estates Willow Valley 1 Yucca KEY 2 3 HUALAPAI (pt) MOHAVE 4 1 Mohave Valley 5 2 Arizona Village LAKE HAVASU CITY Wikieup 3 FORT MOJAVE (pt) Crystal 4 Golden Shores Beach 5 Topock Desert Hills LAKE HAVASU CITY 34° SEE 0 10 20 30 Kilometers 34° SECTION 5 0 10 20 30 Miles 115° 114° 113° 112° E-4 Arizona Maps U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census American Indian Areas, Counties, County Subdivisions, and Places - Section 2 KEY YAVAPAI FREDONIA Lake Powell 1 YAVAPAI-APACHE NATION (pt) PAGE 2 CLARKDALE KAIBAB (pt) 3 COTTONWOOD 4 Verde Village LeChee 5 Cornville 6 Village of Oak Creek (Big Park) 7 YAVAPAI-APACHE NATION (pt) 8 PRESCOTT VALLEY Bitter Springs Kaibito 9 YAVAPAI-PRESCOTT KAIBAB PLATEAU NAVAJO NATION* (pt) TUBA CITY Tonalea Supai Moenkopi HAVASUPAI Grand Canyon Tuba City HAVASUPAI Village HOPI* (pt) HOPI* HUALAPAI (pt) Tusayan HUALAPAI (pt) Cameron HOPI COCONINO WILLIAMS SEE Valle SECTION 3 SEE NAVAJO SECTION 1 NATION (pt) Tolani Lake Seligman Leupp Parks Fort Valley Doney Park WILLIAMS ASH FORK Ash Fork FLAGSTAFF Kachina Village Mountainaire Winslow West (pt) HOPI (pt) Munds Park Paulden FLAGSTAFF YAVAPAI SEDONA Williamson 1 6 CHINO 2 VALLEY JEROME 3 5 CAMP VERDE- PRESCOTT SEDONA 4 Lake Montezuma Bagdad 8 MINGUS PRESCOTT MOUNTAIN 7 CAMP DEWEY- VERDE 9 HUMBOLDT Mayer Wilhoit Spring Valley Peeples Valley Cordes Lakes Congress Yarnell CORDES LAKES- MAYER SEE CONGRESS SECTION 5 Black Canyon City WICKENBURG (pt) PEORIA (pt) 0 10 20 30 Kilometers SEE SECTION 4 0 10 20 30 Miles Maps Arizona E-5 U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census American Indian Areas, Counties, County Subdivisions, and Places - Section 3 112° 111° 110° 109° 37° Red Mesa 37° Oljato-Monument Valley Teec Nos Pos Dennehotso SWEETWATER KAYENTA Rock Point Kayenta DENNEHOTSO Red Rock Shonto Chilchinbito Round Rock Rough Rock Lukachukai Many Farms Tsaile HOPI* CHINLE Sehili PINON (pt) Del Muerto Pinon Chinle Cottonwood Hard Rock NAVAJO NATION* (pt) 36° 36° Hotevilla-Bacavi Low Mountain Nazlini Second Mesa Sawmill First Mesa APACHE Fort Defiance Keams Steamboat Burnside Canyon Shongopovi Jeddito Window Rock Toyei Ganado Kykotsmovi Village St. Michaels Cornfields SEE NAVAJO NATION* (pt) SECTION 2 Whitecone FORT DEFIANCE HOPI Klagetoh Tees Toh Greasewood Oak Springs Seba Dalkai Wide Ruins Dilkon Indian Wells Lupton INDIAN WELLS Houck NAVAJO Sanders NAVAJO HOPI (pt) NATION (pts) WINSLOW Sun Valley 35° Joseph City 35° Winslow KEY West (pt) NAVAJO HOLBROOK 1 White Mountain Lake PUERCO 2 Wagon Wheel WINSLOW-HOLBROOK Woodruff 3 Lake of the Woods 4 PINETOP-LAKESIDE 5 Pinetop Country Club 6 Rainbow City 7 Whiteriver ZUNI (pts) 8 Turkey Creek ST. JOHNS 9 East Fork SNOWFLAKE Concho 10 Seven Mile SNOWFLAKE 11 Fort Apache Heber-Overgaard TAYLOR ST. JOHNS Clay Springs 1 Pinedale Linden SHOW Vernon LOW 2 SPRINGERVILLE FORT APACHE (pt) 3 FORT APACHE 4 5 Hondah McNary EAGAR Cibecue North Greer Fork 34° Nutrioso 34° EAGAR- 6 SPRINGERVILLE 7 8 Alpine SEE 9 FORT APACHE SECTION 4 10 11 0 10 20 30 Kilometers 0 10 20 30 Miles SEE SECTION 7 112° 111° 110° 109° E-6 Arizona Maps U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census American IndianAreas,Counties,County 34° 35° 36° 37° 112° 112° 0 10 20 30 Miles 0 10 20 30 Kilometers NAVAJO 10 SevenMile 11 Fort Apache 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Wheel Wagon 1 MountainLake White East Fork Creek Turkey Whiteriver City Rainbow Pinetop CountryClub PINETOP-LAKESIDE Woods the of Lake KEY SECTION 2 SEE 111° 111° Hotevilla-Bacavi NAVAJO NATION* (pt) NATION* NAVAJO INDIAN WELLS INDIAN Seba Dalkai Seba HOPI* FORT APACHE (pt) FORT APACHE WINSLOW Oljato-Monument Valley Shonto Kykotsmovi Village Kykotsmovi Shongopovi (pt) HOPI (pt) HOPI WINSLOW-HOLBROOK West (pt) West Winslow Subdivisions,andPlaces-Section3 SNOWFLAKE Second Mesa Second FORT APACHE FORT HOPI KAYENTA Heber-Overgaard Clay Springs Clay Hard Rock NAVAJO SECTION 4 Cibecue Low Mountain SEE SNOWFLAKE Tees Toh Tees Canyon Keams Pinedale Dilkon Joseph City First Mesa Chilchinbito PINON Kayenta NATION (pts) NATION NAVAJO Pinon Jeddito Linden HOLBROOK Hondah Greasewood 110° Indian Wells Indian SHOW LOW Whitecone Sun Valley Woodruff Dennehotso TAYLOR DENNEHOTSO 110° North APACHE Fork 1 11 Steamboat 4 7 Toyei 10 Cottonwood 6 2 3 NAVAJO NATION* (pt) NATION* NAVAJO 8 5 Rough Rock 9 FORT APACHE FORT McNary Concho Cornfields Vernon Rock Point PUERCO CHINLE FORT DEFIANCE FORT Many Farms Chinle Burnside SWEETWATER ST. JOHNS ST. Round Rock Ganado Klagetoh Lukachukai Wide Ruins Wide ZUNI (pts) SECTION 7 Nazlini Del Muerto Greer SPRINGERVILLE SEE Red Mesa SPRINGERVILLE Teec Nos Pos Nos Teec Window Rock Window Oak Springs St. Michaels Fort Defiance Fort EAGAR- ST. JOHNS ST. Sanders Houck Red Rock Tsaile EAGAR Sawmill Alpine Sehili Lupton Nutrioso 109° 109° 34° 35° 36° 37° U.S. Census Bureau, 2010Census U.S. CensusBureau, Maps American IndianAreas,Counties,Coun 113° 112° 111° 110° KEY GILA MARICOPA 1 Strawberry 16 Hunter Creek 1 Sun City West 2 Pine 17 Christopher Creek 3 Geronimo Estates 18 Haigler Creek PINAL 1 QUEEN CREEK (pt) 4 Washington Park 19 MIAMI 2 COOLIDGE (pt) 5 Whispering Pines 20 Claypool 6 Beaver Valley 21 Central Heights-Midland City 1 4 3 5 7 Freedom Acres 22 GLOBE 2 7 12 14 8 6 10 8 Flowing Springs 23 Cutter PAYSON 9 SEE 9 East Verde Estates 24 East Globe SEE 13 17 PAYSON 11 15 16 SECTION 3 10 Mesa del Caballo 25 Six Shooter Canyon SECTION 2 11 STAR VALLEY 26 Icehouse Canyon TONTO APACHE Round 18 Oxbow Estates 12 Mead Ranch 27 Pinal Valley 13 Tonto Village Young 14 Kohls Ranch Rye Gisela 34° 34° 15 Bear Flat Deer Creek Jakes Corner WICKENBURG (pt) Carrizo Cedar Creek Aguila TONTO BASIN FORT SURPRISE (pt) SCOTTSDALE (pt) Morristown Tonto Basin APACHE (pt) Wittmann FORT APACHE WICKENBURG PEORIA GILA (pt) Theodore
Recommended publications
  • Area Land Use Plan
    DETAIL VIEW #1 RIM TRAIL ESTATES DETAIL VIEW #2 GIRL SCOUT CAMP 260 KOHL'S RANCH VERDE GLEN FR 199 TONTO CREEK 5 THOMPSON THOMPSON DRAW I E. VERDE RIVER DRAW II BOY SCOUT CAMP FR 64 FR 64 WHISPERING PINES PINE MEADOWS BEAR FLATS FR 199 DETAIL VIEW #3 FLOWING SPRINGS DETAIL VIEW #4 DETAIL VIEW #5 DIAMOND POINT FOREST HOMES & 87 FR 29 COLLINS RANCH E. VERDE RIVER COCONINO COUNTY EAST VERDE PARK FR 64 260 FR 64 TONTO VILLAGE GILA COUNTYLION SPRINGS DETAIL VIEW #6 DETAIL VIEW #7 DETAIL VIEW #8 FR 200 FR FR 291 PONDEROSA SPRINGS CHRISTOPHER CREEK 260 HAIGLER CREEK HAIGLER CREEK (HIGHWAY 260 REALIGNMENT) COLCORD MOUNTAIN HOMESITES HUNTER CREEK FR 200 DETAIL VIEW #9 DETAIL VIEW #10 DETAIL VIEW #11 ROOSEVELT LAKE ESTATES 87 FR 184 188 OXBOW ESTATES SPRING CREEK 188 JAKES CORNER KEY MAP: LEGEND Residential - 3.5 to 5 du/ac Residential - 5 to 10 du/ac Regional Highways and Significant Roadways NORTHWEST NORTHEAST Major Rivers or Streams Residential - 10+ du/ac Gila County Boundary Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial WEST EAST Federal/Incorporated Area Lands CENTRAL CENTRAL Light Industrial LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS Heavy Industrial SOUTH Residential - 0 to 0.1 du/ac Public Facilities AREA LAND USE PLAN Residential - 0.1 to 0.4 du/ac DETAILED VIEWS Multi-Functional Corridor FIGURE 2.F Residential - 0.4 to 1.0 du/ac Mixed Use Residential - 1 to 2 du/ac Resource Conservation 0' NOVEMBER, 2003 3 Mi Residential - 2 to 3.5 du/ac GILA COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2012 Potential Resort/Lodging Use 1 1/2 Mi GILA COUNTY, ARIZONA DETAIL VIEW #1 RIM TRAIL ESTATES DETAIL VIEW #2 GIRL SCOUT CAMP 260 KOHL'S RANCH VERDE GLEN FR 199 TONTO CREEK 5 THOMPSON THOMPSON DRAW I E.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Fishing Regulations 3 Fishing License Fees Getting Started
    2019 & 2020 Fishing Regulations for your boat for your boat See how much you could savegeico.com on boat | 1-800-865-4846insurance. | Local Offi ce geico.com | 1-800-865-4846 | Local Offi ce See how much you could save on boat insurance. Some discounts, coverages, payment plans and features are not available in all states or all GEICO companies. Boat and PWC coverages are underwritten by GEICO Marine Insurance Company. GEICO is a registered service mark of Government Employees Insurance Company, Washington, D.C. 20076; a Berkshire Hathaway Inc. subsidiary. TowBoatU.S. is the preferred towing service provider for GEICO Marine Insurance. The GEICO Gecko Image © 1999-2017. © 2017 GEICO AdPages2019.indd 2 12/4/2018 1:14:48 PM AdPages2019.indd 3 12/4/2018 1:17:19 PM Table of Contents Getting Started License Information and Fees ..........................................3 Douglas A. Ducey Governor Regulation Changes ...........................................................4 ARIZONA GAME AND FISH COMMISSION How to Use This Booklet ...................................................5 JAMES S. ZIELER, CHAIR — St. Johns ERIC S. SPARKS — Tucson General Statewide Fishing Regulations KURT R. DAVIS — Phoenix LELAND S. “BILL” BRAKE — Elgin Bag and Possession Limits ................................................6 JAMES R. AMMONS — Yuma Statewide Fishing Regulations ..........................................7 ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT Common Violations ...........................................................8 5000 W. Carefree Highway Live Baitfish
    [Show full text]
  • Pantano Wash - Rillito River Watershed Arizona Rapid Watershed Assessment June 2007
    Pantano Wash - Rillito River Watershed Arizona Rapid Watershed Assessment June 2007 Prepared by: USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service – Arizona University of Arizona, Water Resources Research Center In cooperation with: Arizona Association of Conservation Districts Arizona Department of Agriculture Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Arizona Department of Water Resources Arizona Game & Fish Department Arizona State Land Department USDA Forest Service USDI Bureau of Land Management Released by: Sharon Megdal David McKay Director State Conservationist University of Arizona U.S. Department of Agriculture Water Resources Research Center Natural Resources Conservation Service Additional Principal Investigators: Dino DeSimone – Natural Resources Conservation Service, Phoenix, Arizona Keith Larson – Natural Resources Conservation Service, Phoenix, Arizona Kristine Uhlman – Water Resources Research Center, University of Arizona D. Phil Guertin – School of Natural Resources, University of Arizona Deborah Young – Associate Director, Cooperative Extension, University of Arizona The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact
    [Show full text]
  • Index 1 INDEX
    Index 1 INDEX A Blue Spring 76, 106, 110, 115 Bluff Spring Trail 184 Adeii Eechii Cliffs 124 Blythe 198 Agate House 140 Blythe Intaglios 199 Agathla Peak 256 Bonita Canyon Drive 221 Agua Fria Nat'l Monument 175 Booger Canyon 194 Ajo 203 Boundary Butte 299 Ajo Mountain Loop 204 Box Canyon 132 Alamo Canyon 205 Box (The) 51 Alamo Lake SP 201 Boyce-Thompson Arboretum 190 Alstrom Point 266, 302 Boynton Canyon 149, 161 Anasazi Bridge 73 Boy Scout Canyon 197 Anasazi Canyon 302 Bright Angel Canyon 25, 51 Anderson Dam 216 Bright Angel Point 15, 25 Angels Window 27 Bright Angel Trail 42, 46, 49, 61, 80, 90 Antelope Canyon 280, 297 Brins Mesa 160 Antelope House 231 Brins Mesa Trail 161 Antelope Point Marina 294, 297 Broken Arrow Trail 155 Apache Junction 184 Buck Farm Canyon 73 Apache Lake 187 Buck Farm Overlook 34, 73, 103 Apache-Sitgreaves Nat'l Forest 167 Buckskin Gulch Confluence 275 Apache Trail 187, 188 Buenos Aires Nat'l Wildlife Refuge 226 Aravaipa Canyon 192 Bulldog Cliffs 186 Aravaipa East trailhead 193 Bullfrog Marina 302 Arch Rock 366 Bull Pen 170 Arizona Canyon Hot Springs 197 Bush Head Canyon 278 Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum 216 Arizona Trail 167 C Artist's Point 250 Aspen Forest Overlook 257 Cabeza Prieta 206 Atlatl Rock 366 Cactus Forest Drive 218 Call of the Canyon 158 B Calloway Trail 171, 203 Cameron Visitor Center 114 Baboquivari Peak 226 Camp Verde 170 Baby Bell Rock 157 Canada Goose Drive 198 Baby Rocks 256 Canyon del Muerto 231 Badger Creek 72 Canyon X 290 Bajada Loop Drive 216 Cape Final 28 Bar-10-Ranch 19 Cape Royal 27 Barrio
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Framework of the Catalina Foothills, Outskirts of Tucson (Pima County, Arizona)
    GEOLOGIC FRAMEWORK OF THE CATALINA FOOTHILLS, OUTSKIRTS OF TUCSON (PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA) W.R. DICKINSON Emeritus, Dept. of Geosciences University of Arizona ARIZONA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CONTRIBUTED MAP CM-99-B MAY 1999 31 p., scale 1 :24,000 TIus report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for confonnity with Arizona Geological Survey standards. ARIZONA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CONTRIBUTED MAP CM-99-B (31 pp., 1 Plate) Geologic Framework of the Catalina Foothills, Outskirts of Tucson (Pima County, Arizona) [Text and Legend to Accompany 1:24,000 Map] William R. Dickinson, Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona May 1999 Introduction and Purpose Past geologic maps and accounts of the sedimentary, geomorphic, and structural geology of the piedmont of the Santa Catalina Mountains in the outskirts of Tucson by Voelger (1953), Pashley (1966), Davidson (1973), Creasey and Theodore (1975), Banks (1976), Anderson (1987), Pearthree et al. (1988), McKittrick (1988), and Jackson (1989) raised questions about the sedimentary evolution of the foothills belt that were left open or unresolved. Multiple dissected alluvial fans and pediments overlie much older faulted and tilted strata to form Cenozoic sedimentary assemblages of considerable stratigraphic and structural complexity. As a contribution to improved understanding of urban geology in the Tucson metropolitan area, systematic geologic mapping of the piedmont belt was undertaken to establish the overall geologic framework of the Catalina foothills (~ 175 2 km ) at a common scale (1 :24,000). The area studied extends from Oracle Road on the west to the vicinity of Rinconado Road on the east, and from the Rillito River and Tanque Verde Wash northward to the limit of bedrock exposures at the base of the Santa Catalina Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Pantano Wash
    Released by: Sharon Medgal David McKay Director State Conservationist University of Arizona U.S. Department of Agriculture Water Resources Research Center Natural Resources Conservation Service Principle Investigators: Dino DeSimone - Natural Resources Conservation Service, Phoenix, Arizona Keith Larson - Natural Resources Conservation Service, Phoenix, Arizona Kristine Uhlman - Water Resources Research Center, University of Arizona D. Phil Guertin - School of Natural Resources, University of Arizona Cite as: USDA Natural Resource ConservationConservations Service, Serivce, Arizona Arizona and and University University of of Arizona Arisona Water Water Resources Resources Research Center. 2008. Little Colorado River HeadwatersHeadwaters, Watershed, Arizona, Rapid Arizona, Watershed Rapid WatershedAssessment. Assessment. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C., 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice or TDD).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix / Attachment 1A
    ATTACHMENT 1A (Supplemental Documentation to the: Mogollon Rim Water Resource, Management Study Report of Findings) Geology and Structural Controls of Groundwater, Mogollon Rim Water Resources Management Study by Gaeaorama, Inc., July, 2006 GEOLOGY AND STRUCTURAL CONTROLS OF GROUNDWATER, MOGOLLON RIM WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT STUDY Prepared for the Bureau of Reclamation GÆAORAMA, INC. Blanding, Utah DRAFT FOR REVIEW 22 July 2006 CONTENTS page Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………….. 1 MRWRMS ii 1/18/11 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………... 2 GIS database……………………………………………………………………………………. 5 Faults and fault systems………………………………………………………………………… 6 Proterozoic faults…………………………………………………………………………… 6 Re-activated Proterozoic faults……………………………………………………………... 6 Post-Paleozoic faults of likely Proterozoic inheritance…………………………………….. 7 Tertiary fault systems……………………………………………………………………….. 8 Verde graben system……………………………………………………………………. 8 East- to northeast-trending system……………………………………………………… 9 North-trending system…………………………………………………………………...9 Regional disposition of Paleozoic strata………………………………………………………. 10 Mogollon Rim Formation – distribution and implications……………………………………..10 Relation of springs to faults…………………………………………………………………… 11 Fossil Springs……………………………………………………………………………… 13 Tonto Bridge Spring………………………………………………………………………..14 Webber Spring and Flowing Spring………………………………………………………..15 Cold Spring………………………………………………………………………………... 16 Fossil Canyon-Strawberry-Pine area…………………………………………………………...17 Speculations on aquifer systems……………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Assessment Units
    APPENDIX A ASSESSMENT UNITS SURFACE WATER REACH DESCRIPTION REACH/LAKE NUM WATERSHED Agua Fria River 341853.9 / 1120358.6 - 341804.8 / 15070102-023 Middle Gila 1120319.2 Agua Fria River State Route 169 - Yarber Wash 15070102-031B Middle Gila Alamo 15030204-0040A Bill Williams Alum Gulch Headwaters - 312820/1104351 15050301-561A Santa Cruz Alum Gulch 312820 / 1104351 - 312917 / 1104425 15050301-561B Santa Cruz Alum Gulch 312917 / 1104425 - Sonoita Creek 15050301-561C Santa Cruz Alvord Park Lake 15060106B-0050 Middle Gila American Gulch Headwaters - No. Gila Co. WWTP 15060203-448A Verde River American Gulch No. Gila County WWTP - East Verde River 15060203-448B Verde River Apache Lake 15060106A-0070 Salt River Aravaipa Creek Aravaipa Cyn Wilderness - San Pedro River 15050203-004C San Pedro Aravaipa Creek Stowe Gulch - end Aravaipa C 15050203-004B San Pedro Arivaca Cienega 15050304-0001 Santa Cruz Arivaca Creek Headwaters - Puertocito/Alta Wash 15050304-008 Santa Cruz Arivaca Lake 15050304-0080 Santa Cruz Arnett Creek Headwaters - Queen Creek 15050100-1818 Middle Gila Arrastra Creek Headwaters - Turkey Creek 15070102-848 Middle Gila Ashurst Lake 15020015-0090 Little Colorado Aspen Creek Headwaters - Granite Creek 15060202-769 Verde River Babbit Spring Wash Headwaters - Upper Lake Mary 15020015-210 Little Colorado Babocomari River Banning Creek - San Pedro River 15050202-004 San Pedro Bannon Creek Headwaters - Granite Creek 15060202-774 Verde River Barbershop Canyon Creek Headwaters - East Clear Creek 15020008-537 Little Colorado Bartlett Lake 15060203-0110 Verde River Bear Canyon Lake 15020008-0130 Little Colorado Bear Creek Headwaters - Turkey Creek 15070102-046 Middle Gila Bear Wallow Creek N. and S. Forks Bear Wallow - Indian Res.
    [Show full text]
  • Document Name
    United States Department of Agriculture Payson Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Project Draft Environmental Assessment United States Forest Service Tonto National Forest, Payson Ranger District January 2018 For More Information Contact: Eric Oswald Payson Ranger District 1009 E Hwy 260 928 474-7900 [email protected] In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD- 3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3. Vanishing Riparian Mesquite Bosques: Their Uniqueness and Recovery Potential
    Chapter 3. Vanishing Riparian Mesquite Bosques: Their Uniqueness and Recovery Potential R. Roy Johnson, Tanner S. Carothers, and Steven W. Carothers Introduction The “mesquite bosque” (Spanish for “forest” or “woodland”), one of the most unique and productive southwestern riparian habitat types, was once far more abundant than it is today. Twenty-five years ago, Stromberg (1993), with a focus on Arizona, provided an excellent review on the ecology, decline, existing threats, and potential for recovery of these mesquite forests. By 1993 the iconic mesquite bosque riparian habitat was in serious decline, due primarily to anthropogenic activities. Stromberg (1993) observed that previous attempts at habitat restoration were of limited success and indicated that much of the significant bosque habitat loss was largely the result of human-induced changes in the biotic and abiotic conditions and processes in river floodplains specifically required by species of mesquite (Prosopis spp.). In this chapter, we update elements of Stromberg’s 1993 review and provide a classification between two types of bosques based on distinct vegetation associations along a relatively dry to wet riparian continuum. We also discuss the uniqueness of mesquite bosques as wildlife habitat and chronicle the loss of some of the more distinctive of these forests in Arizona as well as conditions that led to their disappearance. Lastly, we suggest opportunities for a timely approach to mesquite habitat restoration that will likely arise as a result of recent litigation resolution between the Department of Agriculture and the Center for Biological Diversity and the Maricopa Audubon Society. The Mesquite Bosque Mesquite (Prosopis spp.) forests, or bosques, historically represented one of the most widespread of riparian communities in the Southwest.
    [Show full text]
  • I Support Preferred Alternative D That Would Limit Visitors to Fossil Creed to 1700 Per Day Along with the Other Improvements and Limitations
    From: Roybal, Marcos A -FS To: FS-comments-southwestern-coconino-redrock Subject: FW: Fossil Creek Date: Monday, January 23, 2017 3:56:27 PM From: Branton, Nicole -FS Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 3:55 PM To: Roybal, Marcos A -FS <[email protected]>; Munding, Elizabeth A -FS <[email protected]> Subject: FW: Fossil Creek From: Barbi Buchanan [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 2:14 PM To: Branton, Nicole -FS <[email protected]> Subject: Fossil Creek I support Preferred Alternative D that would limit visitors to Fossil Creed to 1700 per day along with the other improvements and limitations. Thanks for asking for feedback. --Barbi Barbi Buchanan 480.330.6049 cell 1108 No. Alyssa Circle Payson, AZ 85541-3371 From: NICK Elenz To: FS-comments-southwestern-coconino-redrock Subject: Fossil Creek CRMP Date: Monday, January 23, 2017 9:05:23 PM I have hiked in the area for 30 plus years, I get the permit, ok with it. What I would like is some way to permit back country hikers to allow access into the canyon earlier than the current 8 Am, in summer. I have sometimes in the past hit the trail in the dark before sun rise. It is the best time to be in the wilderness, when the sun rises. Please consider it. Thank You Nick Elenz 602 881 2399 From: Rich Rudow To: FS-comments-southwestern-coconino-redrock Subject: Fossil Creek CRMP Date: Monday, January 23, 2017 11:23:57 AM Hello, As an avid hiker, canyoneer, and paddler, I'm enclosing these comments to the Fossil Creek CRMP.
    [Show full text]
  • SR 260 – Payson to Heber Archaeological Project: Results of Archaeological Testing and a Plan for Data Recovery in the Doubtful Canyon Segment
    SR 260 – Payson to Heber Archaeological Project: Results of Archaeological Testing and a Plan for Data Recovery in the Doubtful Canyon Segment Sarah H. Herr Pat H. Stein Technical Report No. 2009-09 Desert Archaeology, Inc. SR 260 – Payson to Heber Archaeological Project: Results of Archaeological Testing and a Plan for Data Recovery in the Doubtful Canyon Segment DRAFT Project Number: STP-053-2 (38) Sarah H. Herr TRACS Number: 260 GI 269 H4698 01C Pat H. Stein Contract Number: 99-59 Submitted to Historic Preservation Team Environmental and Enhancement Group Arizona Department of Transportation 205 South 17th Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Technical Report No. 2009-09 Desert Archaeology, Inc. 3975 North Tucson Boulevard, Tucson, Arizona 85716 • December 2009 COMPLIANCE SUMMARY Date: 18 December 2009 Report Title: SR 260 – Payson to Heber Archaeological Project: Results of Archaeological Testing and a Plan for Data Recovery in the Doubtful Canyon Segment. Technical Report Number 2009-09. Client: Arizona Department of Transportation Client Project Name: State Route 260 – Payson to Heber project Compliance Agency: Tonto National Forest, Arizona Department of Transportation Compliance Level: Federal ADOT TRACS Number: 260 GI 269 H4698 01C Applicable Laws/Regulations: Arizona Antiquities Act, ARS §41-841; Federal Organic Administration Act of June 4, 1897; Antiquities Act of 1906, As Amended; Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979, As Amended; National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Section 106; Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) Applicable Permits: TNF permit TON426 for prehistoric period sites; TNF permit TON425 for historic sites; TNF permit TON570 for survey work. Arizona Antiquties Act Project Specific Permit 1999-121ps Tribal Consultation: When working on Tonto National Forest land the State Route 260 project works under the Plan for the Treatment and Disposition of Human Remains and Other Cultural Items from the Tonto National Forest pursuant to the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (Revised 2001).
    [Show full text]