DOCSLIB.ORG

2018 State Hazard Mitigation Plan Risk Assessment Maps to the Natural Hazards Viewer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2018 State Hazard Mitigation Plan Risk Assessment Maps to the Natural Hazards Viewer State of Arizona Hazard Mitigation Plan 2018 2018 State of Arizona Hazard Mitigation Plan The 2018 State of Arizona Hazard Mitigation Plan is a result of collaboration between state agencies and partners, led by the Arizona Department of Emergency and Military Affairs. For more information on this plan, contact: DEMA Planning Branch [email protected] 602-464-6518 The 2018 State of Arizona Hazard Mitigation Plan is located at: https://dema.az.gov/emergency-management/preparedness/planning-branch 2018 State of Arizona Hazard Mitigation Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Natural and human-caused disasters have led to increasing levels of death, injury, property damage, and interruption of business and government services. The time, money, and effort to respond to and recover from these disasters divert public resources and attention from other important programs and problems. Arizona recognizes the consequences of disasters and the critical need to reduce the impacts of natural and human-caused hazards. It is understood that with careful selection, mitigation measures in the form of education, structural projects, and programs can become long-term, cost effective means for reducing the impact of natural and human-caused hazards. The State of Arizona Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (the Planning Team) has collaborated to prepare the 2018 State of Arizona Hazard Mitigation Plan (the Plan). With the support of the State of Arizona and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), this Plan has resulted in a resource to guide the state toward greater disaster resistance in full harmony with the needs of the region. Arizona’s hazards have the potential to cause widespread loss of life and damage to property, infrastructure, the economy, and the environment. Hazard mitigation is designed to reduce or eliminate risk, by reducing the probability and severity of hazardous events. Mitigation is any sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to life and property, and successful implementation can reduce the enormous cost burden disasters place on individuals in the community and all levels of government. Mitigation can protect critical community facilities, reduce liability, and minimize community disruption. Preparedness, response, and recovery measures support the concept of mitigation and may directly support identified mitigation measures. This Plan has been prepared in compliance with Section 322 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Stafford Act or the Act), 42 USC. 5165, enacted under Sec. 104 the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000, (DMA 2000) Public Law 106-390 of October 30, 2000. This Plan identifies hazard mitigation measures intended to eliminate or reduce the effects of future disasters throughout the state. 2018 i 2018 State of Arizona Hazard Mitigation Plan 2018 ii 2018 State of Arizona Hazard Mitigation Plan 2018 iii 2018 State of Arizona Hazard Mitigation Plan DEMA maintains the State of Arizona Hazard Mitigation Plan as a living document intended to be continuously reviewed and revised, with input from stakeholders, to guarantee the most current plan possible. PLAN REVIEW AND EVALUATION Recommendation By Date Summary of Activity Plan Section Entry Made By 2018 iv 2018 State of Arizona Hazard Mitigation Plan DEMA is committed to ongoing training and engagement related to the State of Arizona Hazard Mitigation Plan to enhance hazard awareness and increase plan implementation. TRAINING AND ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITY Date Summary of Activity Partners Involved Entry Made By 2018 v 2018 State of Arizona Hazard Mitigation Plan The State of Arizona follows the 2016 EMAP Standard to ensure a quality program. Arizona was first accredited in 2004, and was reaccredited in 2009 and 2015. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ACCREDITATION PROGRAM (EMAP) EMAP Standard Component Standard 4.1 Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment and Consequence Analysis The Emergency Management Program identifies the natural and human-caused hazards that potentially 4.1.1 impact the jurisdiction using multiple sources. The Emergency Management Program assesses the risk and vulnerability of people, property, the environment, and its own operations from these hazards. The Emergency Management Program conducts a consequence analysis for the hazards identified in Standard 4.1.1 to consider the impact on the following: (1) purpose and scope or goals and objectives (2) authority (3) situation and assumptions 4.1.2 (4) property, facilities, and infrastructure (5) environment (6) economic condition of the jurisdiction (7) public confidence in the jurisdiction’s governance The Emergency Management Program has a method and schedule for evaluation, maintenance, and 4.1.3 revision of its Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment (HIRA) and Consequence Analysis identified in Standard 4.1.1. 4.2 Hazard Mitigation The Emergency Management Program has a plan to implement mitigation projects and sets priorities based upon loss reduction. The plan: (1) is based on the natural and human-caused hazards identified in Standard 4.1.1 4.2.1 and the risk and consequences of those hazards. (2) is developed through formal planning processes involving Emergency Management Program stakeholders. (3) establishes interim and long-term strategies, measures, goals and objectives. The Emergency Management Program has a process to monitor overall progress of the mitigation 4.2.3 activities and documents completed initiatives and their resulting reduction or limitation of hazard impact on the jurisdiction. 4.2.4 The Emergency Management Program, consistent with the scope of the mitigation 2018 vi 2018 State of Arizona Hazard Mitigation Plan EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ACCREDITATION PROGRAM (EMAP) EMAP Standard Component Standard program, does the following: (1) provides technical assistance in implementing applicable mitigation codes and ordinances (2) identifies ongoing opportunities and tracks repetitive loss (3) participates in applicable jurisdictional, inter-jurisdictional and multi-jurisdictional mitigation efforts The Emergency Management Program has a method and schedule for evaluation, 4.2.5 maintenance, and revision of the plan identified in Standard 4.2.1. 2018 vii 2018 State of Arizona Hazard Mitigation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ I SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1 WHAT IS HAZARD MITIGATION? ....................................................................................................... 1 PLAN PURPOSE .................................................................................................................................. 2 AUTHORITY ....................................................................................................................................... 2 ASSURANCES ..................................................................................................................................... 3 SECTION 2: STATE OVERVIEW ................................................................................................. 4 SECTION CHANGES ............................................................................................................................ 4 GEOGRAPHY ...................................................................................................................................... 4 OPERATIONAL REGIONS .................................................................................................................... 5 NATIVE AMERICAN TRIBES IN ARIZONA ........................................................................................... 2 CLIMATE ........................................................................................................................................... 4 DEMOGRAPHICS ................................................................................................................................ 5 ECONOMY ......................................................................................................................................... 6 SECTION 3: PLANNING PROCESS ............................................................................................. 8 PLANNING TEAM AND ACTIVITIES ..................................................................................................... 8 SECTION 4: RISK ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................... 11 SECTION CHANGES .......................................................................................................................... 11 OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................................... 11 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION ................................................................................................................ 11 CLIMATIC EFFECTS .......................................................................................................................... 12 ARIZONA REGIONS .......................................................................................................................... 13 ASSESSING VULNERABILITY...........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Lower Gila Region, Arizona
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR HUBERT WORK, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 498 THE LOWER GILA REGION, ARIZONA A GEOGBAPHIC, GEOLOGIC, AND HTDBOLOGIC BECONNAISSANCE WITH A GUIDE TO DESEET WATEEING PIACES BY CLYDE P. ROSS WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1923 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAT BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 50 CENTS PEE COPY PURCHASER AGREES NOT TO RESELL OR DISTRIBUTE THIS COPT FOR PROFIT. PUB. RES. 57, APPROVED MAT 11, 1822 CONTENTS. I Page. Preface, by O. E. Melnzer_____________ __ xr Introduction_ _ ___ __ _ 1 Location and extent of the region_____._________ _ J. Scope of the report- 1 Plan _________________________________ 1 General chapters _ __ ___ _ '. , 1 ' Route'descriptions and logs ___ __ _ 2 Chapter on watering places _ , 3 Maps_____________,_______,_______._____ 3 Acknowledgments ______________'- __________,______ 4 General features of the region___ _ ______ _ ., _ _ 4 Climate__,_______________________________ 4 History _____'_____________________________,_ 7 Industrial development___ ____ _ _ _ __ _ 12 Mining __________________________________ 12 Agriculture__-_______'.____________________ 13 Stock raising __ 15 Flora _____________________________________ 15 Fauna _________________________ ,_________ 16 Topography . _ ___ _, 17 Geology_____________ _ _ '. ___ 19 Bock formations. _ _ '. __ '_ ----,----- 20 Basal complex___________, _____ 1 L __. 20 Tertiary lavas ___________________ _____ 21 Tertiary sedimentary formations___T_____1___,r 23 Quaternary sedimentary formations _'__ _ r- 24 > Quaternary basalt ______________._________ 27 Structure _______________________ ______ 27 Geologic history _____ _____________ _ _____ 28 Early pre-Cambrian time______________________ .
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern North Pacific Hurricane Season of 1997
    2440 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW VOLUME 127 Eastern North Paci®c Hurricane Season of 1997 MILES B. LAWRENCE Tropical Prediction Center, National Weather Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Miami, Florida (Manuscript received 15 June 1998, in ®nal form 20 October 1998) ABSTRACT The hurricane season of the eastern North Paci®c basin is summarized and individual tropical cyclones are described. The number of tropical cyclones was near normal. Hurricane Pauline's rainfall ¯ooding killed more than 200 people in the Acapulco, Mexico, area. Linda became the strongest hurricane on record in this basin with 160-kt 1-min winds. 1. Introduction anomaly. Whitney and Hobgood (1997) show by strat- Tropical cyclone activity was near normal in the east- i®cation that there is little difference in the frequency of eastern Paci®c tropical cyclones during El NinÄo years ern North Paci®c basin (east of 1408W). Seventeen trop- ical cyclones reached at least tropical storm strength and during non-El NinÄo years. However, they did ®nd a relation between SSTs near tropical cyclones and the ($34 kt) (1 kt 5 1nmih21 5 1852/3600 or 0.514 444 maximum intensity attained by tropical cyclones. This ms21) and nine of these reached hurricane force ($64 kt). The long-term (1966±96) averages are 15.7 tropical suggests that the slightly above-normal SSTs near this storms and 8.7 hurricanes. Table 1 lists the names, dates, year's tracks contributed to the seven hurricanes reach- maximum 1-min surface wind speed, minimum central ing 100 kt or more. pressure, and deaths, if any, of the 1997 tropical storms In addition to the infrequent conventional surface, and hurricanes, and Figs.
    [Show full text]
  • Pantano Wash - Rillito River Watershed Arizona Rapid Watershed Assessment June 2007
    Pantano Wash - Rillito River Watershed Arizona Rapid Watershed Assessment June 2007 Prepared by: USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service – Arizona University of Arizona, Water Resources Research Center In cooperation with: Arizona Association of Conservation Districts Arizona Department of Agriculture Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Arizona Department of Water Resources Arizona Game & Fish Department Arizona State Land Department USDA Forest Service USDI Bureau of Land Management Released by: Sharon Megdal David McKay Director State Conservationist University of Arizona U.S. Department of Agriculture Water Resources Research Center Natural Resources Conservation Service Additional Principal Investigators: Dino DeSimone – Natural Resources Conservation Service, Phoenix, Arizona Keith Larson – Natural Resources Conservation Service, Phoenix, Arizona Kristine Uhlman – Water Resources Research Center, University of Arizona D. Phil Guertin – School of Natural Resources, University of Arizona Deborah Young – Associate Director, Cooperative Extension, University of Arizona The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact
    [Show full text]
  • Funds Needed for Memorial
    Press Coverage October 2019 that’s also part of the Valley- the loop’s east leg, hovers above golf This Cave Creek circumnavigating Maricopa Trail that communities and ranches backed by hiking trail has connects all 10 county parks. the commanding form of Black Mountain and the distant blade-like pinnacles The ascent is mitigated by long Superstition Mountains. and quartz along its switchbacks cut from foothills that swing around desert trees and A final swing on cliffs above a deep loop saguaro-cluttered bends. The first gorge leads hikers through sunny Mare Czinar, big views are revealed after less than range land where the Quartz and Special for The Republic a mile of uphill trudging. Sloping Jasper trails spin off for optional Published 7:00 a.m. MT Oct. 31, canyon walls frame hazy patterns of geology-themed side trips or a 2019 downtown Phoenix and the jagged shorter loop for young kids. silhouettes of the Hieroglyphic Situated in a hilly slice of desert just Mountains west of the Valley. a few miles east of Interstate 17, Cave Creek Regional Park is bordered by an eclectic brew of subdivisions, strip malls, nature preserves and national forest. Somehow, the seemingly mismatched adjacencies blend into a Scaly rock formations at Gunsight Pass on the Go sort of extended back yard for North John Loop. (Photo: Mare Czinar/Special for The Valley outdoor recreation. Replete Republic) with the standard amenities of Cholla cactus frames views of the Cave Creek Go John Trail suburban patio life, the family- Mountains. (Photo: Mare Czinar/Special for The friendly park has a nature center, Republic) Length: 5.8-mile loop.
    [Show full text]
  • Climatology, Variability, and Return Periods of Tropical Cyclone Strikes in the Northeastern and Central Pacific Ab Sins Nicholas S
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School March 2019 Climatology, Variability, and Return Periods of Tropical Cyclone Strikes in the Northeastern and Central Pacific aB sins Nicholas S. Grondin Louisiana State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Climate Commons, Meteorology Commons, and the Physical and Environmental Geography Commons Recommended Citation Grondin, Nicholas S., "Climatology, Variability, and Return Periods of Tropical Cyclone Strikes in the Northeastern and Central Pacific asinB s" (2019). LSU Master's Theses. 4864. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/4864 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CLIMATOLOGY, VARIABILITY, AND RETURN PERIODS OF TROPICAL CYCLONE STRIKES IN THE NORTHEASTERN AND CENTRAL PACIFIC BASINS A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in The Department of Geography and Anthropology by Nicholas S. Grondin B.S. Meteorology, University of South Alabama, 2016 May 2019 Dedication This thesis is dedicated to my family, especially mom, Mim and Pop, for their love and encouragement every step of the way. This thesis is dedicated to my friends and fraternity brothers, especially Dillon, Sarah, Clay, and Courtney, for their friendship and support. This thesis is dedicated to all of my teachers and college professors, especially Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Framework of the Catalina Foothills, Outskirts of Tucson (Pima County, Arizona)
    GEOLOGIC FRAMEWORK OF THE CATALINA FOOTHILLS, OUTSKIRTS OF TUCSON (PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA) W.R. DICKINSON Emeritus, Dept. of Geosciences University of Arizona ARIZONA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CONTRIBUTED MAP CM-99-B MAY 1999 31 p., scale 1 :24,000 TIus report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for confonnity with Arizona Geological Survey standards. ARIZONA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CONTRIBUTED MAP CM-99-B (31 pp., 1 Plate) Geologic Framework of the Catalina Foothills, Outskirts of Tucson (Pima County, Arizona) [Text and Legend to Accompany 1:24,000 Map] William R. Dickinson, Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona May 1999 Introduction and Purpose Past geologic maps and accounts of the sedimentary, geomorphic, and structural geology of the piedmont of the Santa Catalina Mountains in the outskirts of Tucson by Voelger (1953), Pashley (1966), Davidson (1973), Creasey and Theodore (1975), Banks (1976), Anderson (1987), Pearthree et al. (1988), McKittrick (1988), and Jackson (1989) raised questions about the sedimentary evolution of the foothills belt that were left open or unresolved. Multiple dissected alluvial fans and pediments overlie much older faulted and tilted strata to form Cenozoic sedimentary assemblages of considerable stratigraphic and structural complexity. As a contribution to improved understanding of urban geology in the Tucson metropolitan area, systematic geologic mapping of the piedmont belt was undertaken to establish the overall geologic framework of the Catalina foothills (~ 175 2 km ) at a common scale (1 :24,000). The area studied extends from Oracle Road on the west to the vicinity of Rinconado Road on the east, and from the Rillito River and Tanque Verde Wash northward to the limit of bedrock exposures at the base of the Santa Catalina Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maricopa County Wildlife Connectivity Assessment: Report on Stakeholder Input January 2012
    The Maricopa County Wildlife Connectivity Assessment: Report on Stakeholder Input January 2012 (Photographs: Arizona Game and Fish Department) Arizona Game and Fish Department In partnership with the Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................ i RECOMMENDED CITATION ........................................................................................................ ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................................. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ iii DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................................ iv BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................ 1 THE MARICOPA COUNTY WILDLIFE CONNECTIVITY ASSESSMENT ................................... 8 HOW TO USE THIS REPORT AND ASSOCIATED GIS DATA ................................................... 10 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................... 12 MASTER LIST OF WILDLIFE LINKAGES AND HABITAT BLOCKSAND BARRIERS ................ 16 REFERENCE MAPS .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pantano Wash
    Released by: Sharon Medgal David McKay Director State Conservationist University of Arizona U.S. Department of Agriculture Water Resources Research Center Natural Resources Conservation Service Principle Investigators: Dino DeSimone - Natural Resources Conservation Service, Phoenix, Arizona Keith Larson - Natural Resources Conservation Service, Phoenix, Arizona Kristine Uhlman - Water Resources Research Center, University of Arizona D. Phil Guertin - School of Natural Resources, University of Arizona Cite as: USDA Natural Resource ConservationConservations Service, Serivce, Arizona Arizona and and University University of of Arizona Arisona Water Water Resources Resources Research Center. 2008. Little Colorado River HeadwatersHeadwaters, Watershed, Arizona, Rapid Arizona, Watershed Rapid WatershedAssessment. Assessment. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C., 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice or TDD).
    [Show full text]
  • Maricopa County Regional Trail System Plan
    Maricopa County Regional Trail System Plan Adopted August 16, 2004 Maricopa Trail Maricopa County Trail Commission Maricopa County Department of Transportation Maricopa County Parks and Recreation Maricopa County Planning and Development Flood Control District of Maricopa County We have an obligation to protect open spaces for future generations. Maricopa County Regional Trail System Plan VISION Our vision is to connect the majestic open spaces of the Maricopa County Regional Parks with a nonmotorized trail system. The Maricopa Trail Maricopa County Regional Trail System Plan - page 1 Credits Maricopa County Board of Supervisors Andrew Kunasek, District 3, Chairman Fulton Brock, District 1 Don Stapley, District 2 Max Wilson, District 4 Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5 Maricopa County Trail Commission Supervisor Max Wilson, District 4 Chairman Supervisor Andrew Kunasek, District 3 Parks Commission Members: Citizen Members: Laurel Arndt, Chair Art Wirtz, District 2 Randy Virden, Vice-Chair Jim Burke, District 3 Felipe Zubia, District 5 Stakeholders: Carol Erwin, Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) Fred Pfeifer, Arizona Public Service (APS) James Duncan, Salt River Project (SRP) Teri Raml, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Ex-officio Members: William Scalzo, Chief Community Services Officer Pictured from left to right Laurel Arndt, Supervisor Andy Kunasek, Fred Pfeifer, Carol Erwin, Arizona’s Official State Historian, Marshall Trimble, and Art Wirtz pose with the commemorative branded trail marker Mike Ellegood, Director, Public Works at the Maricopa Trail
    [Show full text]
  • Funds Needed for Memorial
    Press Coverage May 2020 ARIZONA: McDowell Mountain working with that type of The best campsite Regional Park in Maricopa equipment. And again, if it’s windy in every state County out, just wait and do the work DARCY SCHILD, MATTHEW another day.” WILSON MAY 29, 2020, 6:42 AM The fire started in the area of 24th Street and Desert Hills, 4 miles • Camping is a popular way north of Cave Creek Regional to relax, unplug, and have Park, around 1 p.m. May 17. an adventure while maintaining social According to Davila, four or five distancing guidelines. homes, including a vacant one, were • From the Redwood Forest evacuated early on and provided of California to Florida’s structure protection. vibrant natural springs, Sue Stokes/ShutterstockMcDowell Mountain Regional Park. nature enthusiasts can Aircraft were ordered to assist ground crews with the fire, which explore a variety of “Easy to find a private space to Davila said moved around the campsites in the US. camp. Backside of McDowells are homes and “creeped back down a • Insider compiled a list not as popular so if you are like me hill into open space.” Around 8 p.m., of top-ranked campsites in you will love quiet. I have seen all however, high wind gusts caused it every state based on ratings kinds of wildlife from Gila monster to pick back up and head toward from Yelp and (no monster ) to deer,” wrote Yelp Cahava Springs. TripAdvisor. user Mer B, who gave McDowell Mountain Regional Park and its That night, and into the next If baseball is America’s pastime, stunning desert landscape five stars.
    [Show full text]
  • Verification of a Storm Surge Modeling System for the New York City – Long Island Region
    Verification of a Storm Surge Modeling System for the New York City – Long Island Region A Thesis Presented By Thomas Di Liberto to The Graduate School in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Marine and Atmospheric Science Stony Brook University August 2009 Stony Brook University The Graduate School Thomas Di Liberto We, the thesis committee for the above candidate for the Master of Science degree, hereby recommend acceptance of this thesis. Dr. Brian A. Colle, Thesis Advisor Associate Professor School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences Dr. Malcolm J. Bowman, Thesis Reader Professor School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences Dr. Edmund K.M. Chang, Thesis Reader Associate Professor School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences This thesis is accepted by the Graduate School Lawrence Martin Dean of the Graduate School ii Abstract of the Thesis Verification of a Storm Surge Modeling System for the New York City – Long Island Region by Thomas Di Liberto Master of Science in Marine and Atmospheric Science Stony Brook University 2009 Storm surge from tropical cyclones events nor‟ easters can cause significant flooding problems for the New York City (NYC) – Long Island region. However, there have been few studies evaluating the simulated water levels and storm surge during a landfalling hurricane event over NYC-Long Island as well as verifying real-time storm surge forecasting systems for NYC-Long Island over a cool season. Hurricane Gloria was simulated using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) V2.1 model, in which different planetary boundary layer (PBL) and microphysics schemes were used to create an ensemble of hurricane landfalls over Long Island.
    [Show full text]
  • The San Diego Hurricane of 2 October 1858
    THE SAN DIEGO HURRICANE OF 2 OCTOBER 1858 BY MICHAEL CHENOWETH AND CHRISTOPHER LANDSEA The discovery of a hurricane that directly impacted San Diego, California, nearly 150 yr ago has implications for residents and risk managers in their planning for extreme events for the region. ropical cyclones forming in the eastern North 10 September 1976 in California and Arizona, and Pacific Ocean are occasional visitors to the Hurricane Nora in September 1997 in Arizona. Only Tsouthwestern United States. By the time these the 1939 tropical storm made a direct landfall in coastal systems travel far enough to the north to bring their California (Smith 1986), because the other three sys- associated moisture to the United States, the tropical tems entered the United States after first making land- cyclones have normally diminished below tropical fall in Mexico. storm strength over Mexico or over the colder waters The 1939 tropical storm caused $2 million in prop- of the California Current that flows southward along erty damage in California, mostly to shipping, shore the California coast. Rain, sometimes locally excessive, structures, power and communication lines, and crops. is frequently observed in many areas of the southwest- Ships in coastal waters of southern California reported ern United States when tropical cyclone remnants en- southeast winds between 34 and 47 kt (Hurd 1939). ter the region (Blake 1935; Smith 1986). However, no tropical cyclones are recorded or esti- Four tropical cyclones have managed to bring tropi- mated to have made landfall in the southwestern cal storm-force winds to the southwestern United United States as a hurricane, with maximum 1-min States during the twentieth century: a tropical storm surface (10 m) winds of at least 64 kt.
    [Show full text]