DOCSLIB.ORG

Projects to Enhance Arizona's Environment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Projects to Enhance Arizona's Environment Projects to Enhance Arizona’s Environment: An Examination of their Functions, Water Requirements and Public Benefits* May 2006 Sharon B. Megdal, Ph.D. Kelly Mott Lacroix and Andrew Schwarz Water Resources Research Center University of Arizona, Tucson AZ *Funded by the United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Assistance Agreement Number 04-FG-32-0270 with the University of Arizona Table of Contents Section I: Summary Findings Introduction .....................................................................................................................I-1 Background ......................................................................................................................I-2 Methodology ....................................................................................................................I-5 Summary Findings .........................................................................................................I-6 Drivers ..............................................................................................................................I-7 Sponsorship ....................................................................................................................I-10 Benefits ...........................................................................................................................I-14 Water use .......................................................................................................................I-17 Lessons Learned Summary..........................................................................................I-20 Section II: Project Summaries EC Bar Ranch ..............................................................................................................II-3 Little Colorado River Enhancement Demonstration Project..............................II-10 Ahakhav Tribal Preserve............................................................................................II-15 Yuma East Wetlands....................................................................................................II-22 Yuma West Wetlands..................................................................................................II-27 Rio Salado Oeste.........................................................................................................II-32 Rio Salado Phoenix......................................................................................................II-34 Rio Salado Tempe........................................................................................................II-39 Tres Rios.......................................................................................................................II-43 Va Shly ‘ay Akimel......................................................................................................II-47 Bingham Cienega.........................................................................................................II-52 Las Cienegas National Conservation Area..............................................................II-56 San Pedro Three Links Farm.....................................................................................II-60 San Pedro Preserve.....................................................................................................II-64 Agua Caliente Spring..................................................................................................II-70 Ed Pastor Kino Environmental Restoration...........................................................II-74 Esperanza Ranch.........................................................................................................II-79 Marana High Plains Effluent Recharge Project...................................................II-83 Paseo de las Iglesias...................................................................................................II-88 Rillito River Restoration (Swan Wetlands).............................................................II-92 El Rio Antiguo............................................................................................................II-95 Santa Fe Ranch Riparian Restoration......................................................................II-98 San Xavier Indian Reservation Riparian Restoration................................................II-102 North Simpson Riparian Recovery.............................................................................II-109 Sweetwater Wetlands................................................................................................II-116 Tres Rios del Norte.................................................................................................II-121 Accidental Restoration in Pima County.................................................................II-125 Grand Canyon Tamarisk Management and Tributary Restoration...................II-128 Fossil Creek Restoration..........................................................................................II-134 Verde River Headwaters Restoration....................................................................II-138 Appendices A . Project survey used to verify information.....................................................App. A1 B1. Drivers Matrix.................................................................................................App.B1 B2. Benefits Matrix................................................................................................App.B2 C1. Classification of Drivers (Human focused vs. Non-human focused).........App.C1 C2. Classification of Drivers (Human focused vs. Non-human focused).........App.C2 D. Water use flow diagram ............................................................................App.D1 Projects to Enhance Arizona’s Environment Section I. Summary Findings Projects to Enhance Arizona’s Environment Introduction In Arizona, many once lush riparian areas have been lost. This decline has not gone unnoticed, and in the past decade a growing number of efforts have been undertaken to restore, maintain or create new riparian and wetland areas. The number of riparian restoration projects nationwide has also increased, growing exponentially in the last decade. Along side this explosion of restoration projects, the interest of the scientific community and the public at large has also grown significantly. Scientists have conducted many studies examining various aspects of environmental enhancement projects. Considerable Source: Arizona Water Protection Fund research and debate have surrounded defining and measuring restoration areas, and the value of “created” habitat. Other research has focused on identifying the common elements of restoration projects, such as the work by Bernhart, et al. who are compiling a comprehensive database of restoration efforts throughout the United States. In this report, we provide complementary information to these studies in the form of a descriptive look at 0 environmental enhancement projects throughout the State of Arizona. The report examines the more subjective aspects of environmental enhancement projects. At the outset of the project we sought to answer a series of questions: Who are the key players in the implementation of environmental enhancement projects and what factors drive the project’s undertaking? What are the benefits of these projects? How are these projects using scarce water resources? Do they have legal claim to these water sources? And how long will supplementary water be required? Along with answers to these questions, we sought lessons learned both through the specific projects and from the wider lens of the 30 projects taken as a whole. Though the study can not be considered exhaustive, important observations are drawn from the projects we surveyed. The projects highlighted in this study are only a sample of the many environmental enhancement efforts underway in Arizona. In this study we wanted a diverse selection of projects; therefore, project selection was based, in part, on choosing projects with varied sponsors, locations, and intentions. A unique aspect of this study is that it combines a descriptive project summaries with objective surveys to describe the project. The surveys created categories for each area we were interested in examining. For example, project drivers were summarized into categories such as The authors of this study would like to thank Jennifer Jones, former research assistant at the WRRC and Magda- lena Escobeda, WRRC NASA intern. We would also like to extend a special thanks to all of the project contacts and to the staff at the Water Protection Fund for their time spent responding to our surveys, answering our questions and attending stakeholder meetings. This report would not have been possible with out the funding and project support provided by the Phoenix office of the Bureau of Reclamation. Berhardt, E.S., et al. (00). Synthesizing U.S. River Restoration Efforts. Science. Vol 08, 66 Ibid. p. 6 (supporting online material). Westman, WE. (99) Ecological restoration projects: Measuring their performance. Environmental Protection [ENVIRON. PROT.]. Vol. , no. , 07-. David J. Schaeffer, Edwin E. Herricks and Harold W. Kerster. (1988). Ecosystem health: Measuring ecosystem health. Environmental Management, Volume , Number , – . Projects to Enhance Arizona’s Environment I-1 flood control and public use and enjoyment. We filled in each survey based on information gathered for the project summaries and sent the survey to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pantano Wash - Rillito River Watershed Arizona Rapid Watershed Assessment June 2007
    Pantano Wash - Rillito River Watershed Arizona Rapid Watershed Assessment June 2007 Prepared by: USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service – Arizona University of Arizona, Water Resources Research Center In cooperation with: Arizona Association of Conservation Districts Arizona Department of Agriculture Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Arizona Department of Water Resources Arizona Game & Fish Department Arizona State Land Department USDA Forest Service USDI Bureau of Land Management Released by: Sharon Megdal David McKay Director State Conservationist University of Arizona U.S. Department of Agriculture Water Resources Research Center Natural Resources Conservation Service Additional Principal Investigators: Dino DeSimone – Natural Resources Conservation Service, Phoenix, Arizona Keith Larson – Natural Resources Conservation Service, Phoenix, Arizona Kristine Uhlman – Water Resources Research Center, University of Arizona D. Phil Guertin – School of Natural Resources, University of Arizona Deborah Young – Associate Director, Cooperative Extension, University of Arizona The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Framework of the Catalina Foothills, Outskirts of Tucson (Pima County, Arizona)
    GEOLOGIC FRAMEWORK OF THE CATALINA FOOTHILLS, OUTSKIRTS OF TUCSON (PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA) W.R. DICKINSON Emeritus, Dept. of Geosciences University of Arizona ARIZONA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CONTRIBUTED MAP CM-99-B MAY 1999 31 p., scale 1 :24,000 TIus report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for confonnity with Arizona Geological Survey standards. ARIZONA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CONTRIBUTED MAP CM-99-B (31 pp., 1 Plate) Geologic Framework of the Catalina Foothills, Outskirts of Tucson (Pima County, Arizona) [Text and Legend to Accompany 1:24,000 Map] William R. Dickinson, Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona May 1999 Introduction and Purpose Past geologic maps and accounts of the sedimentary, geomorphic, and structural geology of the piedmont of the Santa Catalina Mountains in the outskirts of Tucson by Voelger (1953), Pashley (1966), Davidson (1973), Creasey and Theodore (1975), Banks (1976), Anderson (1987), Pearthree et al. (1988), McKittrick (1988), and Jackson (1989) raised questions about the sedimentary evolution of the foothills belt that were left open or unresolved. Multiple dissected alluvial fans and pediments overlie much older faulted and tilted strata to form Cenozoic sedimentary assemblages of considerable stratigraphic and structural complexity. As a contribution to improved understanding of urban geology in the Tucson metropolitan area, systematic geologic mapping of the piedmont belt was undertaken to establish the overall geologic framework of the Catalina foothills (~ 175 2 km ) at a common scale (1 :24,000). The area studied extends from Oracle Road on the west to the vicinity of Rinconado Road on the east, and from the Rillito River and Tanque Verde Wash northward to the limit of bedrock exposures at the base of the Santa Catalina Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Pantano Wash
    Released by: Sharon Medgal David McKay Director State Conservationist University of Arizona U.S. Department of Agriculture Water Resources Research Center Natural Resources Conservation Service Principle Investigators: Dino DeSimone - Natural Resources Conservation Service, Phoenix, Arizona Keith Larson - Natural Resources Conservation Service, Phoenix, Arizona Kristine Uhlman - Water Resources Research Center, University of Arizona D. Phil Guertin - School of Natural Resources, University of Arizona Cite as: USDA Natural Resource ConservationConservations Service, Serivce, Arizona Arizona and and University University of of Arizona Arisona Water Water Resources Resources Research Center. 2008. Little Colorado River HeadwatersHeadwaters, Watershed, Arizona, Rapid Arizona, Watershed Rapid WatershedAssessment. Assessment. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C., 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice or TDD).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3. Vanishing Riparian Mesquite Bosques: Their Uniqueness and Recovery Potential
    Chapter 3. Vanishing Riparian Mesquite Bosques: Their Uniqueness and Recovery Potential R. Roy Johnson, Tanner S. Carothers, and Steven W. Carothers Introduction The “mesquite bosque” (Spanish for “forest” or “woodland”), one of the most unique and productive southwestern riparian habitat types, was once far more abundant than it is today. Twenty-five years ago, Stromberg (1993), with a focus on Arizona, provided an excellent review on the ecology, decline, existing threats, and potential for recovery of these mesquite forests. By 1993 the iconic mesquite bosque riparian habitat was in serious decline, due primarily to anthropogenic activities. Stromberg (1993) observed that previous attempts at habitat restoration were of limited success and indicated that much of the significant bosque habitat loss was largely the result of human-induced changes in the biotic and abiotic conditions and processes in river floodplains specifically required by species of mesquite (Prosopis spp.). In this chapter, we update elements of Stromberg’s 1993 review and provide a classification between two types of bosques based on distinct vegetation associations along a relatively dry to wet riparian continuum. We also discuss the uniqueness of mesquite bosques as wildlife habitat and chronicle the loss of some of the more distinctive of these forests in Arizona as well as conditions that led to their disappearance. Lastly, we suggest opportunities for a timely approach to mesquite habitat restoration that will likely arise as a result of recent litigation resolution between the Department of Agriculture and the Center for Biological Diversity and the Maricopa Audubon Society. The Mesquite Bosque Mesquite (Prosopis spp.) forests, or bosques, historically represented one of the most widespread of riparian communities in the Southwest.
    [Show full text]
  • A General Historic Properties Treatment Plan for Archaeological Investigations Associated with FCC Cell Tower Construction Projects on Private Lands in Arizona
    A General Historic Properties Treatment Plan for Archaeological Investigations Associated With FCC Cell Tower Construction Projects on Private Lands in Arizona Prepared for: Verizon Wireless Tempe, Arizona Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc. Tempe, Arizona Terracon Project No. 65157582 August 2018 ABSTRACT Report Title: A General Historic Properties Treatment Plan for Archaeological Investigations Associated with FCC Cell Tower Construction Projects on Private Lands in Arizona Report Date: August 2018 Agencies: Federal Communications Commission, Arizona State Historic Preservation Office Project Sponsor: Verizon Wireless (Verizon) Project Description: Verizon constructs and collocates telecommunications facilities in Arizona. Due to the involvement of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the projects, they are considered federal undertakings subject to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. The Arizona State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) reviews FCC-licensed undertakings pursuant to two nationwide programmatic agreements. Some of Verizon’s proposed undertakings may be found by the FCC and SHPO to have an adverse effect on historic properties listed in, or eligible for listing in, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The purpose of this General Historic Properties Treatment Plan (General HPTP) is to streamline the resolution of adverse effects to historic properties listed in, or eligible for listing in, the NRHP by Verizon-sponsored undertakings on private lands in Arizona. This streamlined resolution will also include the preparation of a project-specific addendum to the General HPTP. The General HPTP does not apply to state, county, municipal, or Tribal lands including private lands within tribal reservation boundaries, or to lands under federal jurisdiction. i TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 State Hazard Mitigation Plan Risk Assessment Maps to the Natural Hazards Viewer
    State of Arizona Hazard Mitigation Plan 2018 2018 State of Arizona Hazard Mitigation Plan The 2018 State of Arizona Hazard Mitigation Plan is a result of collaboration between state agencies and partners, led by the Arizona Department of Emergency and Military Affairs. For more information on this plan, contact: DEMA Planning Branch [email protected] 602-464-6518 The 2018 State of Arizona Hazard Mitigation Plan is located at: https://dema.az.gov/emergency-management/preparedness/planning-branch 2018 State of Arizona Hazard Mitigation Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Natural and human-caused disasters have led to increasing levels of death, injury, property damage, and interruption of business and government services. The time, money, and effort to respond to and recover from these disasters divert public resources and attention from other important programs and problems. Arizona recognizes the consequences of disasters and the critical need to reduce the impacts of natural and human-caused hazards. It is understood that with careful selection, mitigation measures in the form of education, structural projects, and programs can become long-term, cost effective means for reducing the impact of natural and human-caused hazards. The State of Arizona Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (the Planning Team) has collaborated to prepare the 2018 State of Arizona Hazard Mitigation Plan (the Plan). With the support of the State of Arizona and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), this Plan has resulted in a resource to guide the state toward greater disaster resistance in full harmony with the needs of the region. Arizona’s hazards have the potential to cause widespread loss of life and damage to property, infrastructure, the economy, and the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Transportation History
    Arizona Transportation History Final Report 660 December 2011 Arizona Department of Transportation Research Center DISCLAIMER The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Arizona Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Trade or manufacturers' names which may appear herein are cited only because they are considered essential to the objectives of the report. The U.S. Government and the State of Arizona do not endorse products or manufacturers. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA-AZ-11-660 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date December 2011 ARIZONA TRANSPORTATION HISTORY 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author 8. Performing Organization Report No. Mark E. Pry, Ph.D. and Fred Andersen 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. History Plus 315 E. Balboa Dr. 11. Contract or Grant No. Tempe, AZ 85282 SPR-PL-1(173)-655 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13.Type of Report & Period Covered ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 206 S. 17TH AVENUE PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85007 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Project Manager: Steven Rost, Ph.D. 15. Supplementary Notes Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration 16. Abstract The Arizona transportation history project was conceived in anticipation of Arizona’s centennial, which will be celebrated in 2012. Following approval of the Arizona Centennial Plan in 2007, the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) recognized that the centennial celebration would present an opportunity to inform Arizonans of the crucial role that transportation has played in the growth and development of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Sediment Transport in Two Desert Streams in Central Arizona, 1991-92 by JOHN T.C
    Channel Change and Sediment Transport in Two Desert Streams in Central Arizona, 1991-92 By JOHN T.C. PARKER U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 95 4059 Prepared in cooperation with the FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT OF MARICOPA COUNTY Tucson, Arizona 1995 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Section Water Resources Division Box 25286, MS 517 375 South Euclid Avenue Denver Federal Center Tucson, AZ 85719-6644 Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction........................................................................................................................................................ 2 Scope of study and purpose of report........................................................................................................ 2 Description of study sites.......................................................................................................................... 4 Salt River........................................................................................................................................... 4 Hassayampa River............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Medically Underserved Areas
    Arizona Department of Health Services Division of Public Health Services Bureau of Health Systems Development Designation of Arizona Medically Underserved Areas October 2014 Janice K. Brewer, Governor Will Humble, Director http://www.azdhs.gov/hsd/data/reports.htm BUREAU OF HEALTH SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT, Arizona Department of Health Services October 2014 Page 1 of 19 INTRODUCTION The Arizona Medically Underserved Area (AzMUA) report is prepared bi ennially by the Arizona Department of Health Services, as mandated by A.R.S. § 36-2352. Within the Arizona Department of Health Services, Division of Public Health Services, the Bureau of Health Systems Development (HSD) is responsible for activities associated with the implementation of A.R.S. § 36-2352. HSD is responsible for assisting communities in obtaining both state and federal shortage designations. Additionally, HSD manages the Arizona Loan Repayment Programs established by A.R.S. § 36-2172 and A.R.S. § 36-2174. The Arizona Loan Repayment Programs provide incentives in the form of loan repayment for primary health care providers to work in medically underserved areas. The Arizona Rural Private Practice Loan Repayment Program utilizes AzMUA designation as a criteria. Non-Department programs that require AzMUA designation include: the Arizona Medical Student Loan Program under A.R.S. Title 15, Chapter 13, Article 7, and priority consideration by the University of Arizona School of Medicine under A.R.S. § 15-1751 for applicants who demonstrate a willingness to practice in the state’s underserved areas and the establishment of health service districts pursuant to A.R.S. Title 48, Chapter 16, Article 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona's Changing Rivers
    ARIZONA'S CHANGING RIVERS: HOW PEOPLE HAVE AFFECTED THE RIVERS Barbara Tellman Water Resources Research Center College of Agriculture Richard Yarde The University of Arizona. Mary G. Wallace March 1997 ARIZONA'S CHANGING RIVERS: HOW PEOPLE HAVE AFFECTED THE RIVERS Barbara Tellman Water Resources Research Center College of Agriculture Richard Yarde The University of Arizona Mary G. Wallace Issue Paper # 19 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This book is a synthesis of the works of hundreds of scholars who have studied Arizona history, archaeology, water law, hydrology, ecology and other topics. The most valuable sources are recognized in the "For Further Reading" section. This book is only a beginning. We welcome information from historians, from people who live along the rivers, people whose ancestors pioneered along rivers, and from experts in related fields. Many thanks to the staff at the Arizona Historical Society and the University of Arizona Special Collections in Tucson, the Arizona Historical Foundation and Arizona Collection at Arizona State University in Tempe. We also thank Joe Gelt, Margaret A. Moote, Ana Rodriguez and Gary Woodard for helpful editorial reviews. Thanks to Patricia Oogjen, Tempe artist, for the cover drawings and other drawings throughout the book. SPECIAL THANKS TO Neil Carmony, Historian Tom Carr, Water Resources Planner, Arizona Department of Water Resources Henry Dobyns, Ethnohistorian Diana Hadley, Ethnohistorian, Arizona State Museum Philip Halpenny, Water Development Corporation V. Ottozawa-Chatupron, P. E., Arizona State Land Department Duncan Patten, Ecologist, Arizona State University FOR THEIR CAREFUL REVIEW OF THE MANUSCRIPT AND MANY HELPFUL SUGGESTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS Feature Sections, Maps, Graphs and Illustrations . iv Suggestions for reading this book vi Changing Rivers • .
    [Show full text]
  • Projects to Enhance Arizona's Environment: an Examination of Their Function, Water Requirements and Public Benefits"
    Projects to Enhance Arizona’s Environment: An Examination of their Functions, Water Requirements and Public Benefits* May 2006 Sharon B. Megdal, Ph.D. Kelly Mott Lacroix and Andrew Schwarz Water Resources Research Center University of Arizona, Tucson AZ *Funded by the United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Assistance Agreement Number 04-FG-32-0270 with the University of Arizona Table of Contents Section I: Summary Findings Introduction .....................................................................................................................I-1 Background ......................................................................................................................I-2 Methodology ....................................................................................................................I-5 Summary Findings .........................................................................................................I-6 Drivers ..............................................................................................................................I-7 Sponsorship ....................................................................................................................I-10 Benefits ...........................................................................................................................I-14 Water use .......................................................................................................................I-17 Lessons Learned Summary..........................................................................................I-20
    [Show full text]
  • 011 ARMLS Grid Map (Page 1)
    LEGEND N G34 GRID BOUNDARY & NUMBER ARIZONA REGIONAL MULTIPLE LISTING SERVICE, INC. Phone: 480-921-7777 • Fax: 480-303-7220 www.armls.com MLS Grid and Area information copyright © 2010 by the Arizona Regional Multiple Listing Service. All rights reserved. Administrative Offices Training Facility The base map is copyright © 2010 by Wide World of Maps, Inc. - Phoenix, Arizona. Reproduction without permission is prohibited by law. 130 S. Priest Drive, Suite #101 120 S. Priest Drive, Suite #105 Tempe, AZ 85281 Tempe, AZ 85281 01051520 SCALE IN MILES 1 inch = 5.017 miles To Salt Lake City St. George UTAH A 89 160 Kanab Four Corners 15 L. Powell NOTED 191 Colorado City Tes Nez lah Moccasin Fredonia Red Mesa Kaibab Glen Canyon Dam Monument A Valley Mexican Teec Nos Pos USE GRID Mesquite Littlefield 389 89A Page 163 Water Pipe Marble Canyon Dennehotso 64 Springs Keet Seel 160 V 15 National 89 Ruin IN MARICOPA Monument Betatakin Kayenta Rock Point 63 Jacob Lake 98 Ruin 89A E COUNTY . Red Valley R Shonto 33 do 564 Cove ra lo Kaibito o Chilchinbito C 89 59 Round Rock Lukachukai N Tuweep Cow Springs 67 Elephant 15 Cedar Ridge Feet Rough Greasewood 68 Rock Many (Upper) Tonalea Farms Supai Canyon The Gap Red Lake North Las Vegas Forest Lake Tsaile Supai 64 L. Mead 160 LAS VEGAS Colorado R. North Rim 41 Canyon de Chelly 515 Grand Canyon Tuba City National Monument 15 Henderson L. Mead National Park Dinosaur Chinle Green Hoover Dam Tracks Moenkopi Piñon 4 Grand Canyon Desert View Valley Village Cottonwood Temple Bar Meadview 7 64 Little Colorado 264 191 Boulder Tusayan River Gorge Sawmill 12 Willow Beach Tusayan Ruin Nazlini City 18 Kykotsmovi Hualapai 64 Hotevilla Joshua Forest Cameron Polacca Keams Canyon L i t t Shongopovi APA Jeddito Fort 95 93 l COCONINO e Gray C Second Mesa Defiance Colorado R.
    [Show full text]