Section 02 - Block Basics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Section 02 - Block Basics Block Basics – Section 2 Section 02 - Block Basics 2.0 Small Block 330 & 350 Block Key Differences. The key differences between the 330 and 350 are the 350’s larger bore and the Generation 1 Cast Iron Small Block V-8 Facts 330’s forged crank. General. In 1964 Olds replaced their small block 215 V8 with 1964 – 1966 Valve Lifter Angle. All 1964–1966 blocks used a a cast iron block of completely new design. The 330 V-8 different valve lifter angle of attack on the cam (45). Thus shared none of its engine block architecture with that of the 1964–1966 330 blocks CANNOT USE 1967 AND LATER 215 V-8 and the 225 V-6 sourced from Buick. The engine CAMS. All 1964–1966 cams WILL NOT WORK in 1967 and was no longer aluminum, but cast iron, as weight became later blocks. Later blocks used a 39 lifter angle. Blocks with less of a factor with the engine going into both the larger a “1” or “1A” cast up near the oil filler tube used the 45 lifter mid-sized F-85s, Cutlasses and the full-size Jetstars angle and should be avoided, if possible. introduced in that year. The engine was designed as a replacement for the 215, but was cast iron and enlarged in Early 330 Rocker Arms. The first run of 330 blocks was anticipation of the growth in size of the mid-size cars, where equipped with rocker arms similar to the previous 394 block it was to be primarily used and as the workhorse for the that traces its heritage back to 1949. These rockers had a entry-level full sized vehicles. Horsepower and torque for the shaft that ran the entire length of the head to which the 330 allowed for the engine to be installed in the full-sized rockers were attached, similar to the Aluminum 215 and Jetstars as the base engine and in 4-barrel form as the Buick engines. This is a very stable setup, but it weighs upscale powerplant. In 1968 the engine was enlarged to 350 more and was more expensive to manufacture than the cubic inches and used in 2-barrel and 4-barrel form. stamped steel rockers that are common on a 1965-1989 Olds. 1964 engines up to the engine serial number 034275 This engine was offered from 1964 through 1975, when it have these heads and should be avoided where possible. was replaced by the Generation 2 small block. This engine was offered in five flavors with displacements from 260 to Bore/Stroke. The small block does have the advantage of an 403 cubic inches. (See below). excellent bore/stroke ratio and nice, easy to oil, main bearing sizes. As such it will rev to 6500 without spinning Not So Thin Wall Casting. The 330/350 small block was bearings if proper oiling is used. It makes more than enough designed to be a “thin wall’ cast design, but because casting torque for "A", "X" and "G" body performance. cores did not have the technology we do today, Olds built a little extra in the walls of the early blocks. Thus, blocks from Bearing Diameter. The small block uses bearing sizes 1964 to 1977 can easily be bored to 0.060”. All 330s can similar to small block Chevys and thus has less bearing come out to the equivalent to a 0.060” over 350 which, for surface to oil, important as the engine rpms rise. The the 330 is 0.1815” over. We have seen 330/350s taken out connecting rod journal size is 2.125”; the main journal size is to be able to take a 425 piston (4.125”), but the block should 2.5000”. be sonic tested first. Frankly, the largest all this boring is Crankshaft. The 330 used a forged crankshaft and all others going to do is take your small block to 360 cubic inches, a did not. The forged crank will take more abuse, however the big gain in a 330, but only 10 cu. in. in a 350. If you are cast nodular iron crank in the early 350 seems to hold up looking for more cubes – go to the big block. In our opinion, well in performance work. Significant in the forged versus except for the 330, over boring should only be used to clean cast crank is that the 330 uses a different flywheel bolt up the bores. pattern than the 350. Thus, 330 flywheels and flexplates are only available in junkyards or from suppliers like Mondello and ATI. If you are scrounging a 330 block for the crank, take the flexplate too. (See the enclosed chart for the appropriate parts numbers). Pistons. Pistons in all 260 through 403 engines (except the diesel) are cast, and use the same construction. As such, they have the same pin position/size, with only the piston bore as different. This allows overbored 330s to accept stock or aftermarket 350 pistons. However, the 330-350 blocks cannot be overbored to accept Generation 2 403 pistons, since the 403 block is siamesed. 350 diesel pistons are of a different construction and pin size. Shared Components with the Big Block. The small block engine shared many of the components of the 400/425 big block that would be introduced a year later. This included The famous “Ram Rod 350” – the 1968 W-31 package. the camshaft, rocker arms and springs, the cam bearings, The air scoops fit under the bumper. It was also offered in 1969. the distributor, the starter, oil pan and front cover and water (This system was used on the 400 W-30 and W-32 as well). - 11 - Block Basics – Section 2 pump. The cylinder heads will bolt on, but they contain much supply and so as to use existing tooling. (Olds was the larger ports and valves, and in most cases, these largest selling GM brand at the time). It was superseded components hurt low-end performance (see W-31 engine by the 307 in 1982. Its small 3.495" bore, but standard option, below). With machining, the cranks could be small block 3.385" stroke kept it over square, but interchanged as they are the same length, (the 330/350 severely restricted the intake valve size and resulted in utilizes 2.12" rod journals versus 2.50"; and 2.50" mains poor combustion chamber swirl12. Contrary to versus 3.00"), but there is little reason to do so as it is far expectations, it was a very inefficient engine at a time more appropriate to select the block for the engine size when fuel efficiency was paramount. The 260 did not desired. A 403 with the 3.975" 455 crank would be 480 cu. come with a 4 bbl manifold. 307 heads and intakes can in. with a 0.030" overbore, however. Interesting. be fitted, but the bores will have to be notched on the intake side. Generation 2 Cast Iron Small Block V-8 Facts . The 307: The 307 was the last Olds V8. It was actually General. This engine though so similar to the previous quite a good engine, and with the right parts can make original 330-350 in size and block design, is considered a excellent HP. It is a true 5.0 Liter engine, with a bore of Generation 3 engine because of its "windowed" main 3.800" and the 3.385" stroke. Its "windowed" main bearing webs. This change is found in all the 260, 307 and journals are its weak point. If you are looking for big 403 designs and the 350s constructed after 1976. All small horsepower from a small block, utilize a 330-350. 330 blocks after 1976, including the diesel, used ½" head bolts and 350 heads can be fitted, but the cylinder bores will 7 rather than /16". likely need to be notched for intake valve clearance, especially if the W-31 style 2.00" (or larger) valves are Thin Wall Casting. This block is truly thin wall cast, and installed. weighs as much as 25 lbs less than 1964-1976 engines. None of these blocks should be overbored more than . The 330: The 330 was the first "thin wall" cast Olds 0.030". block. It came in two flavors: an early 45 lifter angle block and a 39 lifter angle block which was common to Windowed Mains. From 1977 onward all small blocks, all later Olds engines. The 45 lifter angle block requires including the 403 were produced with “windows” in the main special camshafts and is not recommended, though if bearing journal area, which obviously affects strength and you are restoring a 1964-1966 Cutlass, cams are longevity under hard use. (Diesel blocks are an exception). available for this engine. (The original 1964 442 did For 403 owners, there are rumors of solid main journal utilize this block). 403's, cast using the pre-1977 technique. Supposedly 2500 solid main 403's were produced in 1977 - used in the large . The 330 followed the Aluminum 215's "under square" Buick and Olds wagons. A solid main journal 403 can be practice, with a bore larger than stroke at 3.9385" x determined by looking at the block casting number. 403 3.385". The 330 and 350 share many common pieces, except for the crank, which is forged in the 330. This Block Casting Numbers: 557265-4A, 553990-4A, and requires a different flywheel/flexplate. The 1964-1966 554990-4A are supposed to have no “windows”. With only 2500 produced, these are a rare but beneficial find.
Recommended publications
  • Engine Components and Filters: Damage Profiles, Probable Causes and Prevention
    ENGINE COMPONENTS AND FILTERS: DAMAGE PROFILES, PROBABLE CAUSES AND PREVENTION Technical Information AFTERMARKET Contents 1 Introduction 5 2 General topics 6 2.1 Engine wear caused by contamination 6 2.2 Fuel flooding 8 2.3 Hydraulic lock 10 2.4 Increased oil consumption 12 3 Top of the piston and piston ring belt 14 3.1 Hole burned through the top of the piston in gasoline and diesel engines 14 3.2 Melting at the top of the piston and the top land of a gasoline engine 16 3.3 Melting at the top of the piston and the top land of a diesel engine 18 3.4 Broken piston ring lands 20 3.5 Valve impacts at the top of the piston and piston hammering at the cylinder head 22 3.6 Cracks in the top of the piston 24 4 Piston skirt 26 4.1 Piston seizure on the thrust and opposite side (piston skirt area only) 26 4.2 Piston seizure on one side of the piston skirt 27 4.3 Diagonal piston seizure next to the pin bore 28 4.4 Asymmetrical wear pattern on the piston skirt 30 4.5 Piston seizure in the lower piston skirt area only 31 4.6 Heavy wear at the piston skirt with a rough, matte surface 32 4.7 Wear marks on one side of the piston skirt 33 5 Support – piston pin bushing 34 5.1 Seizure in the pin bore 34 5.2 Cratered piston wall in the pin boss area 35 6 Piston rings 36 6.1 Piston rings with burn marks and seizure marks on the 36 piston skirt 6.2 Damage to the ring belt due to fractured piston rings 37 6.3 Heavy wear of the piston ring grooves and piston rings 38 6.4 Heavy radial wear of the piston rings 39 7 Cylinder liners 40 7.1 Pitting on the outer
    [Show full text]
  • Mean Value Modelling of a Poppet Valve EGR-System
    Mean value modelling of a poppet valve EGR-system Master’s thesis performed in Vehicular Systems by Claes Ericson Reg nr: LiTH-ISY-EX-3543-2004 14th June 2004 Mean value modelling of a poppet valve EGR-system Master’s thesis performed in Vehicular Systems, Dept. of Electrical Engineering at Linkopings¨ universitet by Claes Ericson Reg nr: LiTH-ISY-EX-3543-2004 Supervisor: Jesper Ritzen,´ M.Sc. Scania CV AB Mattias Nyberg, Ph.D. Scania CV AB Johan Wahlstrom,¨ M.Sc. Linkopings¨ universitet Examiner: Associate Professor Lars Eriksson Linkopings¨ universitet Linkoping,¨ 14th June 2004 Avdelning, Institution Datum Division, Department Date Vehicular Systems, Dept. of Electrical Engineering 14th June 2004 581 83 Linkoping¨ Sprak˚ Rapporttyp ISBN Language Report category — ¤ Svenska/Swedish ¤ Licentiatavhandling ISRN ¤ Engelska/English ££ ¤ Examensarbete LITH-ISY-EX-3543-2004 ¤ C-uppsats Serietitel och serienummer ISSN ¤ D-uppsats Title of series, numbering — ¤ ¤ Ovrig¨ rapport ¤ URL for¨ elektronisk version http://www.vehicular.isy.liu.se http://www.ep.liu.se/exjobb/isy/2004/3543/ Titel Medelvardesmodellering¨ av EGR-system med tallriksventil Title Mean value modelling of a poppet valve EGR-system Forfattare¨ Claes Ericson Author Sammanfattning Abstract Because of new emission and on board diagnostics legislations, heavy truck manufacturers are facing new challenges when it comes to improving the en- gines and the control software. Accurate and real time executable engine models are essential in this work. One successful way of lowering the NOx emissions is to use Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR). The objective of this thesis is to create a mean value model for Scania’s next generation EGR system consisting of a poppet valve and a two stage cooler.
    [Show full text]
  • A Model-Based Design Approach to Redesign a Crankshaft for Powder Metal Manufacturing
    A model-based design approach to redesign a crankshaft for powder metal manufacturing VASILEIOS ANGELOPOULOS Master of Science Thesis Stockholm, Sweden 2015 A model-based design approach to redesign a crankshaft for powder metal manufacturing VASILEIOS ANGELOPOULOS Master of Science Thesis MMK 2015:100 MKN 154 KTH Industrial Engineering and Management Machine Design SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Examensarbete MMK 2015:100 MKN 154 En modellbaserad designstrategi att omkonstruera en vevaxel för pulvermetallurgi Angelopoulos Vasileios Godkänt Examinator Handledare 2015-11-08 Ulf Sellgren Stefan Björklund Uppdragsgivare Kontaktperson Höganäs ab Marcus Persson Sammanfattning En vevaxel är en motorkomponent som används för att omvandla den fram- och återgående rörelsen hos kolv och vevstake till en roterande rörelse. De klassiska metoderna att tillverka vevaxlar har varit dominerande och inte gett någon plats för alternativa tillverkningsmetoder. Powder manufacturing är en metod som kan revolutionera produktionens effektivitet och ekonomi. För att denna tillverkningsmetod ska vara möjlig måste vevaxeln tillverkas i delar. Webs, counter-weights och journal shafts måste produceras individuellt för att sedan sammanfogas. Den största utmaningen för denna avhandling är att förstå om vevaxelns counter webs kan tillverkas med samma form eller med så få olika former som möjligt. Denna avhandling handlar främst om att fastställa dessa tekniska krav och föreslå en ny, modulär design för PM. En kinematisk-kinetisk analys utförs med hjälp av en befintlig vevaxel som skannats och omvandlats till en CAD-modell. De numeriska värdena jämförs med en MBS-modell från Adams. Vevaxeln analyseras med avseende på balansering då motvikternas placering, massa och geometriska egenskaper undersöks. Nya modeller som följer de tekniska krav som krävs skapas och utvärderas med Pugh-matris.
    [Show full text]
  • Wärtsilä 32 PRODUCT GUIDE © Copyright by WÄRTSILÄ FINLAND OY
    Wärtsilä 32 PRODUCT GUIDE © Copyright by WÄRTSILÄ FINLAND OY COPYRIGHT © 2021 by WÄRTSILÄ FINLAND OY All rights reserved. No part of this booklet may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, graphic, photocopying, recording, taping or other information retrieval systems) without the prior written permission of the copyright owner. THIS PUBLICATION IS DESIGNED TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE AND AUTHORITATIVE INFORMATION WITH REGARD TO THE SUBJECT-MATTER COVERED AS WAS AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. HOWEVER, THE PUBLICATION DEALS WITH COMPLICATED TECHNICAL MATTERS SUITED ONLY FOR SPECIALISTS IN THE AREA, AND THE DESIGN OF THE SUBJECT-PRODUCTS IS SUBJECT TO REGULAR IMPROVEMENTS, MODIFICATIONS AND CHANGES. CONSEQUENTLY, THE PUBLISHER AND COPYRIGHT OWNER OF THIS PUBLICATION CAN NOT ACCEPT ANY RESPONSIBILITY OR LIABILITY FOR ANY EVENTUAL ERRORS OR OMISSIONS IN THIS BOOKLET OR FOR DISCREPANCIES ARISING FROM THE FEATURES OF ANY ACTUAL ITEM IN THE RESPECTIVE PRODUCT BEING DIFFERENT FROM THOSE SHOWN IN THIS PUBLICATION. THE PUBLISHER AND COPYRIGHT OWNER SHALL UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES BE HELD LIABLE FOR ANY FINANCIAL CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR OTHER LOSS, OR ANY OTHER DAMAGE OR INJURY, SUFFERED BY ANY PARTY MAKING USE OF THIS PUBLICATION OR THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN. Wärtsilä 32 Product Guide Introduction Introduction This Product Guide provides data and system proposals for the early design phase of marine engine installations. For contracted projects specific instructions for planning the installation are always delivered. Any data and information herein is subject to revision without notice. This 1/2021 issue replaces all previous issues of the Wärtsilä 32 Project Guides. Issue Published Updates 1/2021 15.03.2021 Technical data updated.
    [Show full text]
  • Engine Block Materials and Its Production Processes
    ENGINE BLOCK MATERIALS AND ITS PRODUCTION PROCESSES 2.2 THE CAST IRON MONOLITHIC BLOCK The widespread use of cast iron monolithic block is as a result of its low cost and its formidability. This type of block normally comes as the integral type where the engine cylinder and the upper crankcase are joined together as one. The iron used for this block is the gray cast iron having a pearlite-microstructure. The iron is called gray cast iron because its fracture has a gray appearance. Ferrite in the microstructure of the bore wall should be avoided because too much soft ferrite tends to cause scratching, thus increasing blow-by. The production of cast iron blocks using a steel die is rear because its lifecycle is shortened as a result of the repeated heat cycles caused by the molten iron. Sand casting is the method widely used in the production of cast iron blocks. This involves making the mould for the cast iron block with sand. The preparation of sand and the bonding are a critical and very often rate-controlling step. Permanent patterns are used to make sand molds. Usually, an automated molding machine installs the patterns and prepares many molds in the same shape. Molten metal is poured immediately into the mold, giving this process very high productivity. After solidification, the mold is destroyed and the inner sand is shaken out of the block. The sand is then reusable. The bonding of sand is done using two main methods: (i) the green sand mold and (ii) the dry sand mold.
    [Show full text]
  • Crankpin Bearings in High Output Aircraft Piston Engines the Evolution of Their Design and Loading by Robert J
    Crankpin Bearings in High Output Aircraft Piston Engines The Evolution of their Design and Loading by Robert J. Raymond July 2015 Abstract powered truck. There you will invariably find a 6-cylinder, 4-stroke cycle, open chamber, turbocharged, aftercooled The development of the crankpin bearing in high output engine with electronically controlled fuel injection. Gone are aircraft piston engines is traced over the period 1915-1950 in the two-stroke cycle, divided combustion chambers, and the a large number of liquid and air cooled engines of both many variants of mechanical injection systems found in American and European origin. The changes in bearing truck engines of the past. dimensions are characterized as dimensionless ratios and At the end of the large piston engine era there was still a the resulting changes in the associated weights of rotating broad spectrum of engine configurations being produced and reciprocating parts as weight densities at the crankpin. and actively developed. Along with the major division Bearing materials and developments are presented to indi- between liquid and air-cooled engines there was a turbo- cate how they accommodated increasing bearing loads. compounded engine, a four-row air-cooled radial engine, Bearing loads are characterized by maximum unit bearing engines with poppet valves and engines with sleeve valves, pressure and minimum oil film thickness and plotted as a all in production. There were also a two-stroke turbo-com- function of time. Most of the data was obtained from the lit- pounded Diesel engine, a 2-stroke spark ignition sleeve erature but some results were calculated by the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Cat-3408-3412-Torque
    3408 & 34 1 2 G EN E RATO R S ET E N G I N ES SE N R2561 -0 1 CATERPILLAR' Specifications 3408 & 3412 GENERATOR SET ENGINES Media Number -SENR2561-01 Publication Date -01/02/2001 Date Updated -15/10/2001 Engine Design (3408) CYLINDER AND VALVE LOCATION Bore ... 137.2 mm (5.40 in.) Stroke ... 152.4 mm (6.00 in.) Arrangement and Number of Cylinders ... 65° V-8 Valves per Cylinder ... 4 Combustion ... Direct Injection Firing Order (Injection Sequence) ... 1,8,4,3,6,5,7,2 Rotation of Crankshaft (when seen from flywheel end) ... counterclockwise Rotation of Fuel Pump Camshaft (when seen from pump drive end) ... counterclockwise NOTE: Front end of engine is opposite to flywheel end. 3 3408 & 34 1 2 G EN E RATO R S ET E N G I N ES SE N R2561 -0 1 CATERPILLAR' Specifications 3408 & 3412 GENERATOR SET ENGINES Media Number -SENR2561-01 Publication Date -01/02/2001 Date Updated -15/10/2001 Engine Design (3412) CYLINDER AND VALVE LOCATION Bore ... 137.2 mm (5.40 in.) Stroke ... 152.4 mm (6.00 in.) Arrangement and Number of Cylinders ... 65° V-12 Valves per Cylinder ... 4 Combustion ... Direct Injection Firing Order (Injection Sequence) ... 1,4,9,8,5,2,11,10,3,6,7,12 Rotation of Crankshaft (when seen from flywheel end) ... counterclockwise 5 3408 & 3412GENERATOR SET ENGINES S E N R256 1 -0 1 CATERPILLAR Specifications 3408 & 3412 GENERATOR SET ENGINES Media Number -SENR2561-01 Publication Date -01/02/2001 Date Updated -15/10/2001 Cylinder Heads (3408) (1) Large bolts (3/4 inch).
    [Show full text]
  • Mike Mavrigian Special Firing Order Camshafts Allow the Performance
    Performance Perspectives Special firing order camshafts allow the performance engine builder to create a smoother-running engine, with improved fuel distribution and enhanced crankshaft and main bearing durability. his article falls under the category for the same reasons...to smooth out the harmon- of “thinking outside the box.” It’s a ics in the pursuit of greater engine durability and trite phrase, I know, but the point to potentially generate more power. is that we don’t need to always Power gain potential aside, the primary reason think of an OE carmaker’s engine to address (and alter) cylinder firing order is to Mike firing order specification as gospel. achieve a smoother-running engine (a smoother, Mavrigian In certain racing applications, a special firing or- more lineal acceleration ramp), with less harmonic Tder (SFO) camshaft can be used as a tuning aid, effect (and crank deflection) on the crankshaft and [email protected] allowing the competition engine builder to fur- its main bearings. In theory, virtually all engines can ther address combustion heat and crankshaft dis- benefit from this. The engines that can most bene- turbance (harmonic) issues. fit include those that run at or near peak rpm levels In essence, the goal in changing the firing or- for long periods of time, such as oval track, road der is to create a smoother-running engine and race and marine engine applications, as well as en- more even fuel distribution, with enhanced gines that are called upon to produce maximum crankshaft and main bearing durability. In the power in a very short period of time (drag race).
    [Show full text]
  • United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,950,587 Sattler Et Al
    USOO5950587A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,950,587 Sattler et al. (45) Date of Patent: Sep. 14, 1999 54 CONTINUOUSLY WARIABLE RUNNER 2682431-A1 4/1993 France. LENGTH MANIFOLD 3825000 A1 2/1989 Germany .......................... 123/184.55 60-224923 11/1985 Japan .................... ... 123/184.55 75 Inventors: Eric R. Sattler, Trenton; Joel S. 2239899 7/1991 United Kingdom ...... ... 123/184.55 Myers, Southgate; Michael J. Haspel, Westland, all of Mich. Primary Examiner Erick R. Solis 73 Assignee: BASF Corporation, Mount Olive, N.J. ASSistant Examiner Brian Hairston Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Ryan W. Massey; James J. Drake 22 Filed: Jul. 22, 1998 A continuously variable runner length manifold is provided (51) Int. Cl. ................................................ FO2B 27/06 for an internal combustion engine. The continuously vari 52 U.S. Cl. .................. 123/184.55; 123/18453 able runner length manifold includes a housing having an 58 Field of Search ........................... 123/184.55, 18453 inlet port and a plurality of outlet ports defined by a plurality of Stacked manifold Sections. A plurality of runner members 56) References Cited are rotatably mounted within the housing. The runner mem bers include wall portions which combine with the housing U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS to define a plurality of runners in communication with a 4,619,226 10/1986 Ueda et al. ........................ 123s2 MB plenum and a respective one of the outlet ports. The runners 4,699,630 10/1987 Lee et al. ............................... 48/1801 have a length which is continuously variable upon rotation of the runner members relative to the housing. FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS 237755 A2 9/1987 European Pat.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Bulletin Mack Trucks Greensboro, NC USA Trucks
    Service Bulletin Mack Trucks Greensboro, NC USA Trucks Date Group No. Release Page This service bulletin replaces bulletin 200-321 dated 9.2016. 9.2016 200 321 17 1(56) Specifications MP8 Specifications W2005779 Specifications are included for MACK MP8 engines. Not all specifications apply to all engines. Note: This service bulletin also applies to MACK Trucks Australia. Contents • “General”, page 3 • “Engine”, page 6 • “Valve Mechanism”, page 8 • “Engine Timing Gears”, page 13 • “Crank Mechanism”, page 15 • “Lubricating and Oil System”, page 18 • “Fuel System”, page 20 • “Inlet and Exhaust System”, page 20 • “Cooling System”, page 22 • “Engine Control System”, page 26 • “Tightening Torques and Patterns”, page 27 • “Engine Lubricants and Sealants”, page 56 PV776-89271894 USA79451 Mack Trucks Date Group No. Release Page Service Bulletin 9.2016 200 321 17 2(56) Note: Information is subject to change without notice. Illustrations are used for reference only and may differ slightly from the actual vehicle being serviced. However, key components addressed in this information are represented as accurately as possible. Mack Trucks Date Group No. Release Page Service Bulletin 9.2016 200 321 17 3(56) Specifications General Weights and Dimensions, MP8 US07, US2010, US2014 Engine type In-line direct injection diesel Number of cylinders 6 Displacement 13 L Swept volume 12.78 L Cylinder bore and stroke 131 x 158 mm (5.16 x 6.22 inches) Emissions level EPA 07: 2.5g NOx; 0.1g Pt maximum US2010 and US2014: 0.2 g/hp-hr NOx maximum Fuel system Dual solenoid
    [Show full text]
  • ENGINES: an Engine Failure Is Always Bad News. Besides Taking Away
    ENGINES: An engine failure is always bad news. Besides taking away your wheels, it forces you to make a painful financial decision. If the cost to repair, overhaul or replace the engine is more than the resale value of your car or truck, the investment may not be worth it. But if your vehicle is in good condition otherwise, repairing or replacing the engine may be less expense than trading for another used vehicle (always a gamble), or taking on payments for a new car or truck. Assuming you have gotten past the initial trauma and has decided in favor of fixing the engine, you have to figure out why the engine failed so the repaired engine (or replacement engine) won't suffer the same fate. A good place to start your postmortem is to review the circumstances that preceded the failure. Sometimes failures occur unexpectedly. One minute the engine is running fine and you're keeping up with traffic, and the next you're sitting along side the road with the hood up wondering what happened. In most instances, though, there is ample warning that something is amiss long before the engine actually fails. Unusual engine noises, low oil pressure, engine overheating, loss of power, misfiring, hard starting and similar drivability and performance complaints can all be indications of problems that need attention. The underlying cause may be something minor or major. There is no way to know unless somebody checks it out. If a motorist ignores such warnings long enough, it can be a very costly mistake because eventually the engine may succumb to whatever is causing the problem, which is a classic example of the famous preventive maintenance line, "You can pay me now or you can pay me later." ENGINE OVERHEATING Overheating can be caused by any number of things.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.4L (DOHC) Engine Mechanical Specifications
    60DegreeV6.com 3.4L (DOHC) Engine Mechanical Specifications Millimeters Inches Application General Data Engine Type -- 60° V-6 Displacement -- 240 Cu In Liter (VIN) -- 3.4 (X) RPO -- LQ1 Bore 92 3.622 Stroke 84 3.307 Deck Height 224 8.818 Compression Ratio -- 9.50:1 Firing Order -- 1-2-3-4-5-6 Oil Pressure @ Operating 103 kPa @ 1100 RPM 15 psi min @ 1100 RPM Temperature Cylinder Bore Diameter 92.020-92.038 3.6228-3.6235 Out Of Round Maximum 0.010 0.0004 Taper -- Thrust Side Maximum 0.013 0.00051 Center Distance 111.76 4.4 Piston Diameter-gauged at skirt 91.985-92.000 3.6215-3.6220 10.44 mm (0.413 in) below centerline of piston pin bore Clearance 0.020-0.052 0.0008-0.0020 Pin Bore 23.003-23.010 0.9056-0.9059 Piston Ring Compression Groove 0.033-0.079 0.0013-0.0031 Clearance 1st and 2nd Gap (at gauge diameter) 1st 0.20-0.45 0.008-0.018 1 60DegreeV6.com Gap (at gauge diameter) 2nd 0.56-0.81 0.022-0.032 Oil Groove Clearance 0.028-0.206 0.0011-0.0081 Gap (segment at gauge 0.25-0.76 0.0098-0.0299 diameter) Tension 1st 27.6 N 6.2 lbs Tension 2nd 19.8 N 4.5 lbs Tension Oil 31.2 N 7.0 lbs Piston Pin Diameter 22.9915-22.9964 0.9052-0.9054 Clearance 0.0066-0.0185 0.00026-0.00073 Fit In Rod 0.0165-0.0464 0.0006-0.0018 Crankshaft Main Journal Diameter-All 67.239-67.257 2.6472-2.6479 Taper-Maximum 0.005 0.0002 Out Of Round-Maximum 0.005 0.0002 Cylinder Block Main Bearing 72.155-72.168 2.8407-2.8412 Bore Diameter Crankshaft Main Bearing Inner 67.289-67.316 2.6492-2.6502 Diameter Main Bearing Clearance 0.019-0.064 0.0008-0.0025 Main Thrust Bearing Clearance
    [Show full text]