DOCSLIB.ORG

241 County Motion for Summary Judgment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CASE 0:17-cv-05155-SRN-LIB Doc. 241 Filed 02/01/21 Page 1 of 112 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Court File No. 17-cv-05155 (SRN-LIB) Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe, et al., DEFENDANTS’ Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM OF LAW v. IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT County of Mille Lacs, et al., ON RESERVATION CESSION Defendants. CASE 0:17-cv-05155-SRN-LIB Doc. 241 Filed 02/01/21 Page 2 of 112 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ..................................................................................... V INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1 STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS ................................................................ 2 A. The 1837 Treaty .................................................................................... 4 B. 1855 Treaty creates a reservation ........................................................ 5 C. The Dakota War of 1862 ...................................................................... 6 D. In 1863 the government opens negotiations to consolidate the Chippewa band at a new reservation. ................................................. 9 E. In 1864 Hole-in-the-Day negotiates a new treaty. ............................ 12 F. In 1867 the White Earth Reservation was created. ........................... 12 G. Timber interests and settlers seek to enter the former reservation.......................................................................................... 13 H. The Folsom Decision. ........................................................................ 15 I. In 1889 Congress passed the Nelson Act. ......................................... 16 J. Settlers and timber interest file on land within ceded reservation......................................................................................... 20 K. In 1902, the Band agreed to move to White Earth. ..........................23 L. Subsequent litigation over disposition of lands within the 1855 reservation.......................................................................................... 25 ARGUMENT .......................................................................................................... 30 I. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD. ...................................................... 30 II. THROUGH A SERIES OF TREATIES AND AGREEMENTS, THE MILLE LACS BAND CEDED BOTH ITS 1855 RESERVATION AND ALSO ITS COMMUNAL PRIVILEGE TO STAY WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE FORMER 1855 RESERVATION. ........................ 30 A. The 1855 Treaty with the Chippewa created the former Mille Lacs reservation. ................................................................................ 31 B. In 1863, the Mississippi Chippewa agreed to cede their six reservations. .......................................................................................33 C. In 1864 Hole-in-the-Day procures a new, but substantially similar treaty. ..................................................................................... 35 i CASE 0:17-cv-05155-SRN-LIB Doc. 241 Filed 02/01/21 Page 3 of 112 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page D. In 1867, along with other Mississippi Chippewa Bands, the Mille Lacs again ceded the lands granted in the 1863 and 1864 Treaties. .............................................................................................. 37 1. The plain language of three treaties shows unambiguous intent of cession. ..................................................................... 38 2. The plain language of the proviso in Article XII created neither a permanent home nor a permanent or exclusive right to occupancy. ................................................................. 39 E. In 1889 Congress enacted legislation to consolidate the Mississippi Chippewa bands including the Mille Lacs, at White Earth. ................................................................................................. 40 F. In 1902 the Mille Lacs Band accepted $40,000 to remove to White Earth. ....................................................................................... 41 III. THE CONTEMPORANEOUS UNDERSTANDING OF THE PARTIES TO THE VARIOUS TREATIES AND AGREEMENTS WAS THAT THE MILLE LACS BAND HAD CEDED THE 1855 RESERVATION. ....... 45 A. The Government expected the Mille Lacs Band to remove in short order. ......................................................................................... 45 B. In an 1875 council in Washington, head chief Shaboshkung admitted the Band had ceded the 1855 reservation. ....................... 49 C. In 1880 the Mille Lac Band asked for a new treaty to better protect their interest. ......................................................................... 51 D. For decades, the Department of Interior held that the Mille Lacs reservation had been ceded to the United States. .................... 52 E. After the Indian Reorganization of 1934, the Department again concluded the 1855 reservation at Mille Lacs was gone. .................. 61 F. The 1936 constitution of the Mississippi Chippewa Tribe conformed to Interior’s position that the Mille Lacs Band’s original reservation was gone. .......................................................... 63 G. Only recently has Interior reversed its position on disestablishment. .............................................................................. 64 IV. THE PATTERN OF SETTLEMENT FROM THE LATE 1800S TO THE EARLY PART OF THE 1900S IS ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE THE 1855 RESERVATION NO LONGER EXISTED. ................................. 65 ii CASE 0:17-cv-05155-SRN-LIB Doc. 241 Filed 02/01/21 Page 4 of 112 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page A. In 1884 Congress imposed a freeze on further patenting of land within the former reservation. ................................................. 66 B. Following the Walters decision in 1893 and 1898 Congress confirmed the validity of otherwise proper entries. ......................... 67 C. After agreeing in 1902 to move to White Earth, the large majority of Band members did so. .................................................... 71 D. The cartographic record also reflects disestablishment. .................. 73 V. THE BAND’S CLAIMS ARE BARRED BY THE DOCTRINES OF CLAIM PRECLUSION, ISSUE PRECLUSION, AND JUDICIAL ESTOPPEL. ................................................................................................... 75 A. The Band’s claims are barred by claim preclusion because the Supreme Court has already concluded the reservation does not exist. ................................................................................................... 75 1. In 1913, the Supreme Court confirmed the Band had ceded its reservation. ............................................................... 76 2. In 1926, the Supreme Court affirmed, as it did in 1913, the 1855 reservation no longer existed—it had been ceded to the United States. ...................................................... 79 3. The Band is bound by the finding that the Mille Lacs Reservation was expressly ceded by the 1864 Treaty. ........... 82 B. Issue preclusion bars the Band from relitigating the issues central to prior judgments affirming the 1855 reservation was ceded.................................................................................................. 83 C. The Band’s present assertion regarding the 1855 reservation is contrary to its earlier assertions and is thus barred by judicial estoppel. ............................................................................................ 85 VI. THE EQUITABLE DOCTRINE OF LACHES BARS THE BAND’S CLAIM REGARDING THE 1855 RESERVATION. .................................... 89 VII. THE INDIAN CLAIMS COMMISSION ACT BARS THE CLAIM BY THE MILLE LACS BAND THAT THE RESERVATION WAS NEVER DISESTABLISHED. .................................................................................... 92 A. In 1946 Congress created a tribunal to decide all types of tribal claims. ............................................................................................... 92 iii CASE 0:17-cv-05155-SRN-LIB Doc. 241 Filed 02/01/21 Page 5 of 112 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page B. The Mille Lacs Band claims regarding the continued existence of the Mille Lacs Reservation are barred by the ICCA. .................... 93 CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................... 98 iv CASE 0:17-cv-05155-SRN-LIB Doc. 241 Filed 02/01/21 Page 6 of 112 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases Baouch v. Werner Enters., Inc., 908 F.3d 1107 (8th Cir. 2018) ............................................................................ 87 Bear v. U.S., 810 F.2d 153 (8th Cir. 1987) ............................................................................... 77 Block v. N.D. Ex Rel Bd. of Univ. & Sch. Lands, 461 U.S. 273 (1983) ............................................................................................ 95 Bravo-Fernandez v. U.S., 137 S.Ct. 352 (2016) ........................................................................................... 84 Canadian St. Regis Band of Mohawk Ind. v. New York, 146 F. Supp. 2d 170 (N.D.N.Y. 2001) ................................................................. 77 Cayuga Indian Nation of N.Y. v. Pataki, 413 F.3d 266 (2d Cir. 2005) ............................................................................... 91 Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986) ...........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • The Legacy of Solem V. Bartlett: How Courts Have Used Demographics to Bypass Congress and Erode the Basic Principles of Indian Law

    The Legacy of Solem V. Bartlett: How Courts Have Used Demographics to Bypass Congress and Erode the Basic Principles of Indian Law

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UW Law Digital Commons (University of Washington) Washington Law Review Volume 84 Number 4 11-1-2009 The Legacy of Solem v. Bartlett: How Courts Have Used Demographics to Bypass Congress and Erode the Basic Principles of Indian Law Charlene Koski Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons Recommended Citation Charlene Koski, Comment, The Legacy of Solem v. Bartlett: How Courts Have Used Demographics to Bypass Congress and Erode the Basic Principles of Indian Law, 84 Wash. L. Rev. 723 (2009). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol84/iss4/5 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington Law Review by an authorized editor of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Koski_DTPed[1].docx (Do Not Delete) 11/23/2009 12:52 PM Copyright © 2009 by Washington Law Review Association THE LEGACY OF SOLEM V. BARTLETT: HOW COURTS HAVE USED DEMOGRAPHICS TO BYPASS CONGRESS AND ERODE THE BASIC PRINCIPLES OF INDIAN LAW Charlene Koski Abstract: Only Congress has authority to change a reservation’s boundaries, so when disputes arise over whether land is part of a reservation, courts turn to congressional intent. The challenge is that in many cases, Congress expressed its intent to diminish or disestablish a reservation as long as one hundred years ago through a series of “surplus land acts.”1 To help courts with their task, the Supreme Court in Solem v.
  • Southern Division Little Traverse Bay Bands Of

    Southern Division Little Traverse Bay Bands Of

    Case 1:15-cv-00850-PLM-PJG ECF No. 610 filed 04/29/19 PageID.11737 Page 1 of 66 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN – SOUTHERN DIVISION LITTLE TRAVERSE BAY BANDS OF ODAWA INDIANS, a federally recognized Indian tribe, Plaintiff, v. Court File No.15-cv-850 Hon. Paul L. Maloney Gretchen WHITMER, Governor of the State of Michigan, et al., Defendants. Tribe’s Response in Opposition to Municipal Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment William A. Szotkowski James A. Bransky Jessica Intermill 9393 Lake Leelanau Dr. Andrew Adams III Traverse City, MI 49684 Hogen Adams PLLC Phone: (231) 946-5241 1935 W. County Rd. B2, Ste. 460 E-mail: [email protected] St. Paul, MN 55113 Phone: (651) 842-9100 Donna Budnick E-mail: [email protected] 7500 Odawa Cir. [email protected] Harbor Springs, MI 49740 [email protected] Phone: (231) 242-1424 [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians Case 1:15-cv-00850-PLM-PJG ECF No. 610 filed 04/29/19 PageID.11738 Page 2 of 66 Table of Contents I. Factual Background .................................................................................................. 1 A. The Land .......................................................................................................................1 B. The Treaties ..................................................................................................................5 1. March 28, 1836: The Treaty of Washington ..........................................................
  • PETITION Ror,RECOGNITION of the FLORIDA TRIBE Or EASTERN CREEK INDIANS

    PETITION Ror,RECOGNITION of the FLORIDA TRIBE Or EASTERN CREEK INDIANS

    'l PETITION rOR,RECOGNITION OF THE FLORIDA TRIBE or EASTERN CREEK INDIANS TH;: FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEK INDIANS and the Administra­ tive Council, THE NORTHWEST FLORIDA CREEK INDIAN COUNCIL brings this, thew petition to the DEPARTMENT Or THE INTERIOR OF THE FEDERAL GOVERN- MENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and prays this honorable nation will honor their petition, which is a petition for recognition by this great nation that THE FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEK INDIANS is an Indian Tribe. In support of this plea for recognition THE FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEK INDIANS herewith avers: (1) THE FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEK INDIANS nor any of its members, is the subject of Congressional legislation which has expressly terminated or forbidden the Federal relationship sought. (2) The membership of THE FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEK INDIANS is composed principally of persons who are not members of any other North American Indian tribe. (3) A list of all known current members of THE FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEK INDIANS, based on the tribes acceptance of these members and the tribes own defined membership criteria is attached to this petition and made a part of it. SEE APPENDIX----- A The membership consists of individuals who are descendants of the CREEK NATION which existed in aboriginal times, using and occuping this present georgraphical location alone, and in conjunction with other people since that time. - l - MNF-PFD-V001-D0002 Page 1of4 (4) Attached herewith and made a part of this petition is the present governing Constitution of THE FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEKS INDIANS.
  • Reply Brief of Plaintiff-Appellant Oneida Nation

    Reply Brief of Plaintiff-Appellant Oneida Nation

    Case: 19-1981 Document: 45 Filed: 12/09/2019 Pages: 54 No. 19-1981 In the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ONEIDA NATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VILLAGE OF HOBART, WISCONSIN, Defendant-Appellee. _______________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, No. 1:16-cv-01217-WCG. The Honorable William C. Griesbach, Judge Presiding. REPLY BRIEF OF PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT ONEIDA NATION ARLINDA F. LOCKLEAR (Counsel of Record) PAUL R. JACQUART 4113 Jenifer Street, NW JESSICA C. MEDERSON Washington, DC 20015 HANSEN REYNOLDS LLC (202) 237-0933 301 North Broadway, Suite 400 Milwaukee, WI 53202 JAMES R. BITTORF (414) 455-7676 KELLY M. MCANDREWS ONEIDA LAW OFFICE VANYA S. HOGEN N7210 Seminary Road WILLIAM A. SZOTKOWSKI P.O. Box 109 HOGEN ADAMS PLLC Oneida, WI 54155 1935 West County Rd. B2, Suite 460 (920) 869-4327 St. Paul, MN 55113 (651) 842-9100 Counsel for Plaintiff-Appellant COUNSEL PRESS ∙ (866) 703-9373 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Case: 19-1981 Document: 45 Filed: 12/09/2019 Pages: 54 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ........................................................................................................ iii ARGUMENT ..................................................................................................................................1 I. The Supreme Court has explicitly rejected the Village’s diminishment theory ......1 A. The Supreme Court has repeatedly construed the Dawes Act, and allotment of reservations thereunder, as leaving reservations intact............3 B. The Supreme Court has construed the Indian country statute to reject the Village’s distinction between non-Indian fee patents acquired from allottees and those acquired under a surplus lands act ............................................................................................................................9 C. The Supreme Court’s most recent case on reservation diminishment rejected the Village’s “extreme allotment” diminishment theory ...............12 II.
  • Quarrernary GEOLOGY of MINNESOTA and PARTS of ADJACENT STATES

    Quarrernary GEOLOGY of MINNESOTA and PARTS of ADJACENT STATES

    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Ray Lyman ,Wilbur, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director P~ofessional Paper 161 . QUArrERNARY GEOLOGY OF MINNESOTA AND PARTS OF ADJACENT STATES BY FRANK LEVERETT WITH CONTRIBUTIONS BY FREDERICK w. SARDE;30N Investigations made in cooperation with the MINNESOTA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1932 ·For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract ________________________________________ _ 1 Wisconsin red drift-Continued. Introduction _____________________________________ _ 1 Weak moraines, etc.-Continued. Scope of field work ____________________________ _ 1 Beroun moraine _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 47 Earlier reports ________________________________ _ .2 Location__________ _ __ ____ _ _ __ ___ ______ 47 Glacial gathering grounds and ice lobes _________ _ 3 Topography___________________________ 47 Outline of the Pleistocene series of glacial deposits_ 3 Constitution of the drift in relation to rock The oldest or Nebraskan drift ______________ _ 5 outcrops____________________________ 48 Aftonian soil and Nebraskan gumbotiL ______ _ 5 Striae _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 48 Kansan drift _____________________________ _ 5 Ground moraine inside of Beroun moraine_ 48 Yarmouth beds and Kansan gumbotiL ______ _ 5 Mille Lacs morainic system_____________________ 48 Pre-Illinoian loess (Loveland loess) __________ _ 6 Location__________________________________
  • Little Crow Historic Canoe Route

    Little Crow Historic Canoe Route

    Taoyateduta Minnesota River HISTORIC water trail BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Twin Valley Council U.S.-Dakota War of 1862 AUGUST 17, 1862 The TA-OYA-TE DUTA Fish and Wildlife Minnesota River Historic Water Four Dakota men kill five settlers The Minnesota River Basin is a Trail, is an 88 mile water route at Acton in Meeker County birding paradise. The Minnesota stretching from just south of AUGUST 18 River is a haven for bird life and Granite Falls to New Ulm, Minne- several species of waterfowl and War begins with attack on the sota. The river route is named af- riparian birds use the river corri- Lower Sioux Agency and other set- ter Taoyateduta (Little Crow), the dor for nesting, breeding, and rest- tlements; ambush and battle at most prominent Dakota figure in ing during migration. More than the U.S.-Dakota War of 1862. Redwood Ferry. Traders stores 320 species have been recorded in near Upper Sioux Agency attacked the Minnesota River Valley. - The Minnesota River - AUGUST 19 Beneath the often grayish and First attack on New Ulm leading to The name Minnesota is a Da- cloudy waters of the Minnesota its evacuation; Sibley appointed kota word translated variously as River, swim a diverse fish popula- "sky-tinted water” or “cloudy-sky tion. The number of fish species commander of U.S. troops water". The river is gentle and and abundance has seen a signifi- AUGUST 20 placid for most of its course and cant rebound over the last several First Fort Ridgely attack. one will encounter only a few mi- years.
  • Mille Lacs Area Visitor Profile: September 2014 – August 2015

    Mille Lacs Area Visitor Profile: September 2014 – August 2015

    TOURISM CENTER Mille Lacs Area Visitor Profile: September 2014 – August 2015 Authored by Xinyi Qian, Ph.D. Mille Lacs Area Visitor Profile: September 2014 – August 2015 March 15, 2016 Authored by Xinyi (Lisa) Qian, Ph.D., University of Minnesota Tourism Center Sponsors: Central Regional Sustainable Development Partnerships Initiative Foundation Mille Lacs County Partner: Mille Lacs Tourism Council Reviewers: Carol Altepeter Richard Baker Tina Chapman Daniel Erkkila, Ph.D. William Gartner, Ph.D. Elizabeth Templin Editor: Elyse Paxton The University of Minnesota Tourism Center is a collaboration of University of Minnesota Extension and the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences. © 2016 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. University of Minnesota Extension is an equal opportunity educator and employer. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, this material is available in alternative formats upon request. Direct requests to (612) 624-7165. Printed on recycled and recyclable paper with at least 10 percent postconsumer waste material. i Mille Lacs Lake area visitor profile, final report Table of Contents List of Figures iii List of Tables v Executive Summary vi 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. METHODOLOGY 1 Study setting 1 Sampling 1 Approaching and screening respondents 1 Questionnaire 2 Response rate 2 Analysis 3 3. RESULTS 4 Respondents 4 Trip information 9 Trip activities 15 Trip purpose and planning 17 4. DISCUSSION 23 Trip information 23 Visitor spending 24 Demographics 24 Group size and
  • FY2020 Game and Fish Fund Report

    FY2020 Game and Fish Fund Report

    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp Game and Fish Fund Report Fishing on the Mississippi River from June 2019 For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 Game and Fish Fund Fiscal Year 2020 Annual Report Letter from the Commissioner ...................................................................................................................... 1 Game and Fish Fund...................................................................................................................................... 3 Game and Fish Operations Account Fund 2200 ........................................................................................ 11 Deer and Bear Management Account Fund 2201 ..................................................................................... 15 Emergency Deer Feeding and Wild Cervidae Health Management Account Fund 2201 .......................... 17 Deer Management Account Fund 2202 .................................................................................................... 19 Waterfowl Habitat Improvement Account Fund 2203 .............................................................................. 21 Trout and Salmon Account Fund 2204 ...................................................................................................... 23 Pheasant Habitat Improvement Account Fund 2205 ...............................................................................
  • (SOME) NOTABLE PEOPLE US-DAKOTA WAR of 1862 Cop Yright © 2012

    (SOME) NOTABLE PEOPLE US-DAKOTA WAR of 1862 Cop Yright © 2012

    (SOME) NOTABLE PEOPLE US-DAKOTA WAR OF 1862 www.USDakotaWarMNCountyByCounty.com Cop yright © 2012 READ ABOUT IN: See Resource section for Book titles and Codes, (SOME)DAKOTA CHIEFS AND LEADERS COUNTY Journal titles and Codes Note: this list is far from complete, It is presented to show the many different kinds of people that were involved in the U.S. Dakota War of 1862. Big Eagle, Jerome (Wamditanka), born 1827 at Black Dog's Village, son of Chief Gray Iron, and succeeded him as chief. In 1857 he was at the Redwood Agency and joined the farmer band. He was a reluctant participant in the US Dakota War. DI.DU, DW.LCSS, TDE, TN, WW, Surrendered to Col Sibley at Camp Release, Dakota, Redwood, Brown, http://collections.mnhs.org/MN imprisoned at Davenport. Lived last years near Nicollet, Yellow Med., HistoryMagazine/articles/38/v3 Granite Falls. Renville, Lac qui Parle 8i03p126-149.pdf Good Road: band leader. Participated in the attack on the Yellow Medicine Agency warehouse. Father of the sub-chief Mankato (not the old chief for whom the town was named). His band members were noted as part of the group at the Ft. Snelling internment camp. DD. DII, TDE Dakota, Yellow Medicine, CM, DU, LCSS, LP, TDU, TDE, Little Crow McLeod TN, TT, Mankato, Chief Yellow Med. Renville, Brown DD, DU,DW, LP,TDE DD, DW, TDE, TN, biography in Mazomani (Iron Walker) Yellow Medicine TT, Red Iron (Maza Sa, Mazaxa) Lac qui Parle DW, TDU, LP, TN Shakopee (Little Six) a Mdewakanton chief whose village was located near present-day Shakopee in the 1840's, and after 1853 near the Redwood Agency.
  • The Life and Times of Cloud Man a Dakota Leader Faces His Changing World

    The Life and Times of Cloud Man a Dakota Leader Faces His Changing World

    RAMSEY COUNTY All Under $11,000— The Growing Pains of Two ‘Queen Amies’ A Publication o f the Ramsey County Historical Society Page 25 Spring, 2001 Volume 36, Number 1 The Life and Times of Cloud Man A Dakota Leader Faces His Changing World George Catlin’s painting, titled “Sioux Village, Lake Calhoun, near Fort Snelling.” This is Cloud Man’s village in what is now south Minneapolis as it looked to the artist when he visited Lake Calhoun in the summer of 1836. Smithsonian American Art Museum, Gift of Mrs. Joseph Harrison, Jr. See article beginning on page 4. RAMSEY COUNTY HISTORY Executive Director Priscilla Farnham Editor Virginia Brainard Kunz RAMSEY COUNTY Volume 36, Number 1 Spring, 2001 HISTORICAL SOCIETY BOARD OF DIRECTORS Howard M. Guthmann CONTENTS Chair James Russell 3 Letters President Marlene Marschall 4 A ‘Good Man’ in a Changing World First Vice President Cloud Man, the Dakota Leader, and His Life and Times Ronald J. Zweber Second Vice President Mark Dietrich Richard A. Wilhoit Secretary 25 Growing Up in St. Paul Peter K. Butler All for Under $11,000: ‘Add-ons,’ ‘Deductions’ Treasurer The Growing Pains of Two ‘Queen Annes’ W. Andrew Boss, Peter K. Butler, Norbert Conze- Bob Garland mius, Anne Cowie, Charlotte H. Drake, Joanne A. Englund, Robert F. Garland, John M. Harens, Rod Hill, Judith Frost Lewis, John M. Lindley, George A. Mairs, Marlene Marschall, Richard T. Publication of Ramsey County History is supported in part by a gift from Murphy, Sr., Richard Nicholson, Linda Owen, Clara M. Claussen and Frieda H. Claussen in memory of Henry H.
  • M-37032 NOV 2 0 2015 To: Secretary

    M-37032 NOV 2 0 2015 To: Secretary

    United States Department of the Interior O FFICE OF T HE SOLICITOR 1849 C STREET N .W. WASHINGTON, DC 2024 0 M-37032 NOV 2 0 2015 To: Secretary From: Solicitor Subject: Opinion on the Boundaries of the Mille Lacs Reservation I. INTRODUCTION This opinion provides my legal conclusion regarding the current status of the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe's (Band) Reservation boundari es. The basis of this opinion is a very in-depth, careful review of the relevant historical documents pertaining to the United States' treatment of the Band's land over the course of more than one hundred years. Sadly, this historical overview reveals that the United States' dealings with the Band were not always a shining example of fa ir and honorable dealings, as it reveals a series of interactions fraught with hidden agendas, arbitrary shifts in policy, utter confusion, and broken commitments. As reflected in the discussion below, on several occasions, the United States was aware of the unauthorized encroachments within the Band's Reservation, but due to external economic and settlement pressures, the government fa il ed to maintain a consistent and clear position on the status of the Band's lands, leading to a gradual , ad hoc opening of the reservation to settlement and development without the requisite, clear Congressional intent to change the boundaries of the Band's Reservation. Although not necessary to the underlying legal determination, thi s opinion honors our modern day values and principles of fairness, transparency, and accountabili ty, and strives to set the record straight and not commit the errors of the past.
  • Three Indian Accounts of the Uprising

    Three Indian Accounts of the Uprising

    A portrait of Chief Big Eagle, taken before tlie Sioux Uprising AS RED MEN V/IEWED IT Three Indian Accounts of the Uprising Edited by KENNETH CARLEY IN THE abundant source material on the Eagle by Return I. Holcombe, then a repre­ Sioux Uprising of 1862 there is depressingly sentative of the St. Paul Pioneer Press. Hol­ httle testimony from the Indian side. While combe's interest in the Sioux Uprising white participants and their mixed-blood apparently had been stimulated by his ex­ friends told their versions of the conflict in amination of the Henry H. Sibley Papers in numerous contemporary narratives, long- 1893 for the Minnesota Historical Society. after reminiscences, soldiers' reports, dia­ (See above, p. 100.) ries, letters, official documents, and the like, In the late spring of 1894 Holcombe the Indians were silent except for brief and visited scenes of the outbreak in the Minne­ sometimes ludicrous statements attributed sota River Valley and searched out Sioux to them at the time of capture or during Indians still living there. Then he went on trials in the field. to Flandreau, South Dakota, to talk with It was not until 1894 that an important Mrs. Nancy Huggan.i While there he met Indian story of the war came out in the form Chief Big Eagle, who had left his home near of an extensive interview with Chief Big Granite Falls for a visit to Flandreau. The 126 MINNESOTA History reporter seized this opportunity to get, first­ same subject gave certain information, but hand, the story of the uprising from a promi­ requested that their names be not printed.