Housing Choice Voucher Program
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Parks and Recreation
PARKS AND RECREATION Parks and Recreation Overview of Facilities and Programs The Department of Parks and Recreation manages 400 parks and open areas in its approximately 6,200 acres of property throughout the City, works with the public to be good stewards of the park system, and provides safe and welcoming opportunities for the public to play, learn, contemplate, and build community. The park system comprises about 10% of the City’s land area; it includes 485 buildings, 224 parks, 185 athletic fields, 122 children's play areas, 24 community centers, 151 outdoor tennis courts, 22 miles of boulevards, an indoor tennis center, two outdoor and eight indoor swimming pools, four golf courses, studios, boat ramps, moorage, fishing piers, trails, camps, viewpoints and open spaces, a rock climbing site, a conservatory, a classical Japanese garden, and a waterfront aquarium. The development of this system is guided by the Seattle Parks & Recreation Plan 2000, the 38 neighborhood plans, the Joint Athletic Facilities Development Program with the Seattle School District, the 1999 Seattle Center and Community Centers Levy, the 2000 Parks Levy, and DPR’s annual update to the Major Maintenance Plan. 2000 Parks Levy In November 2000, Seattle voters approved a $198.2 million levy lid lift for Parks and Recreation. The levy closely follows the plan forged by the Pro Parks 2000 Citizens Planning Committee. The levy is designed to fund more than 100 projects to improve maintenance and enhance programming of existing parks, including the Woodland Park Zoo; acquire, develop and maintain new neighborhood parks, green spaces, playfields, trails and boulevards; and add out-of-school and senior activities. -
A Driving Force
N011V&Then byPaulDorpat T H E N : A caravan of motorcars featuring the Seattle Press Club in at least one pennant proceeds north past Mount Baker on a new Lake Washington Boulevard. The lakeshore was considerably changed in 1916 when the lake was lowered for the opening of the Lake Washington Ship Canal. NOW: Cars still make the scenic loop along the lake. A Driving Force 0 5 the parkway the Olmsted Brothers envisioned ~ ~~~~~!~~;~rs~ ~~e ~a~~~~~e~~~~~e~~ when they planned the city's parks and boule gers or even the occasion that prompted such vards in the early 20th century. Their highest a long caravan to snake along Lake Wash ambitions were to purchase the entire west ington Boulevard through the Mount Baker side of the lake up to the ridge between Col cutves and into Colman Park. man and Leschi parks and carry the boulevard I do, however, speculate. The year may be to a scenic "crestline." Instead, the parkway 1909, when thispartofthe boulevard was new. was developed into a string of parks that often If so, then the motorcade is probably headed meanders with the boulevard. for the Alaska-Yukon-Pacific Exposition, which When the lake was lowered 9 feet in 1916, opened chat spring on the University of Wash the concrete and riprap seawalls were exposed. ington campus. Pieces of the boulevard were Here at Mount Baker the seawall was kept, and rushed to completion so processions like this a new, landscaped slope drops from it to the one could cover the distance from Wetmore shoreline. -
Discovery Park
Final Vegetation Management Plan Discovery Park Prepared for: Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation Seattle, Washington Prepared by: Bellevue, Washington March 5, 2002 Final Vegetation Management Plan Discovery Park Prepared for: Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation 100 Dexter Seattle, Washington 98109 Prepared by: 11820 Northup Way, Suite E300 Bellevue, Washington 98005-1946 425/822-1077 March 5, 2002 This document should be cited as: Jones & Stokes. 2001. Discovery Park. Final Vegetation Management Plan. March 5. (J&S 01383.01.) Bellevue, WA. Prepared for Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation, Seattle, WA. Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION AND APPROACH........................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction....................................................................................................................1 1.2 Approach .......................................................................................................................2 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND RECENT VEGETATION STUDIES ........................................3 2.1 A Brief Natural History of Discovery Park .........................................................................3 2.2 2001 Vegetation Inventory ...............................................................................................4 2.3 Results of Vegetation Inventory ........................................................................................4 2.3.1 Definitions ......................................................................................................4 -
History Summary Sand Point Peninsula
HISTORY SUMMARY SAND POINT PENINSULA PRE-EURO AMERICAN SETTLEMENT POST-WAR • Native American group associated with —hloo-weelth-AHBSH“ peoples inhabited • 1947, rumored that NAS Seattle to be closed due to creation of Air Force three longhouses along Wolf Bay, immediately south of Sand Point • 1950, station scheduled for deactivation, delayed due to Korean War th MID-1800S EXPLORATION • 1950, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service established research laboratory NE 65 St. • 1850, first likely Euro-American sighting of peninsula, name Sand Point used • 1952, base closed except for Naval Reserve activities late 1950s, rumors of jet • 1855, U.S. Government Land Office surveyed Sand Point aircraft use, requiring extended runways, jet fuel storage EURO-AMERICAN SETTLEMENT • 1965 - —Outdoor Recreation and Open Space Plan“, Seattle Park Department • 1868, William Goldmyer homesteaded 81 acres immediately south of Pontiac and Seattle Planning Commission, identified Naval Air Station for major park Bay development • 1886-90, shipyard, Pontiac Brick and Tile Company, Pontiac Post Office • 1969, main airstrip resurfaced and extended to 4,800 feet, estimated cost established northwest part of peninsula $500,000 • 1914, Pontiac Brick and Tile Company closed MILITARY TO CIVILIAN CONVERSION • 1910s to early 1920‘s, four families resided northwest portion of Sand Point • June 30, 1970, air station deactivated, all flight operations ended, surplus 347 • 1918 to 1926, Carkeek Park located on the northwestern part of peninsula acres EARLY AIRFIELD DEVELOPMENT • 1975, 196 acres of the station transferred to the City of Seattle for Sand Point • Late 1910s to 1920s King County acquired small farms on Sand Point peninsula Park • June 19, 1920, groundbreaking ceremony with symbolic tree cutting and first • 1975, Sand Point Park Master Plan, proposed 75-acre Sports Meadow, tennis aircraft landing, station size 400 acres courts; neighborhood park, maintenance complex, and restaurant. -
ANDERTON Music Festival Capitalism
1 Music Festival Capitalism Chris Anderton Abstract: This chapter adds to a growing subfield of music festival studies by examining the business practices and cultures of the commercial outdoor sector, with a particular focus on rock, pop and dance music events. The events of this sector require substantial financial and other capital in order to be staged and achieve success, yet the market is highly volatile, with relatively few festivals managing to attain longevity. It is argued that these events must balance their commercial needs with the socio-cultural expectations of their audiences for hedonistic, carnivalesque experiences that draw on countercultural understanding of festival culture (the countercultural carnivalesque). This balancing act has come into increased focus as corporate promoters, brand sponsors and venture capitalists have sought to dominate the market in the neoliberal era of late capitalism. The chapter examines the riskiness and volatility of the sector before examining contemporary economic strategies for risk management and audience development, and critiques of these corporatizing and mainstreaming processes. Keywords: music festival; carnivalesque; counterculture; risk management; cool capitalism A popular music festival may be defined as a live event consisting of multiple musical performances, held over one or more days (Shuker, 2017, 131), though the connotations of 2 the word “festival” extend much further than this, as I will discuss below. For the purposes of this chapter, “popular music” is conceived as music that is produced by contemporary artists, has commercial appeal, and does not rely on public subsidies to exist, hence typically ranges from rock and pop through to rap and electronic dance music, but excludes most classical music and opera (Connolly and Krueger 2006, 667). -
Way to Grow News for Urban Gardeners
way to grow news for urban gardeners JUNE/JULY 2009 | VOLUME 32 | NUMBER 3 Do Goats Belong in Your Garden? Jennie Grant, President & Founder, Goat Justice League, and a Seattle Tilth instructor “The prudent man does not make the goat his gardener,” says an old Hungarian prov- erb, and it certainly is hard to imagine how a goat could beautify your garden. However, a farm animal “garden room” adds tremen- dous interest to your yard, and with a hand- some goat shed and lots of wood chips, it lends a certain charm. Goats are always up to something interesting–relaxing in the sun, chewing their cud, or trying figure out a way to break out of their yard and eat your prize rose bushes. While adding interest to the garden, for many Seattleites, the primary reason to keep goats is the milk they produce. There is Children pick flowers at our Teaching Peace Through Gardening program with the Atlantic something very satisfying about opting out Street Center. of the factory farm system and drinking a glass of milk from your own goat. Also, fresh Summer Partnerships Continued on page 3 Lisa Taylor, Children’s Program Manager Freeway Park, Occidental Square, Cascade Each week of the academy we will work Seattle Tilth will be collaborating with three Playground and Belltown Cottage Park. with 50 youth at Aki Kurose Middle School fantastic community partners this summer to grow a container garden, explore soils and to offer organic gardening education to tar- Atlantic Street Center composting and provide organic gardening geted populations in the Seattle area. -
Carkeek Park
CARKEEK PARK FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN Update 2007 2 This Forest Management Plan is dedicated to Nancie Hernandez in grateful appreciation for 13 years of Park Maintenance and volunteer guidance. LAN Front cover photos taken in subunits: 4 B 1 C 1 B 3 A 1 C 3 CARKEEK PARK FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN Created by Peter Noonan, March – December 2002 Updated by Lex Voorhoeve, December 2005 – November 2007 Prepared for: • Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation • Carkeek Park Advisory Council Funding sources: Carkeek Park Advisory Council Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation, Urban Forestry Unit Seattle Department of Neighborhoods Matching Fund NOTE Like any forest management plan, this is a dated document, now describing the situation by the end of 2007. Over the next ten years big changes are expected in the Carkeek forest, particularly due to the over-mature Alder/Maple forest declining. Updating this document in response to those changes will likely need to occur every five years. RECOMMENDATION The non-forested units in Carkeek Park include unique wetland and riparian habitat, valuable to salmon and other wildlife. A management plan to address those units would make an excellent companion to this document. Diagrams by Peter Noonan Maps by Dale Johnson Photos and drawings by Lex Voorhoeve Plant Palettes, Appendix 5, completed by Doug Gresham Photo 1. Jacobo switchback between subunits 1B and 1C, installed by the Parks Trails Program; volunteer crew led by Jacobo Jimenez. 4 Figure 1. Carkeek Park Trails Map 5 SUMMARY 7 1. INTRODUCTION 7 2. BACKGROUND 8 HISTORY 8 PARK USE 8 PHYSICAL NATURE 8 SOIL STRATIFICATION 9 LANDSLIDES 9 SEDIMENTATION 10 FORESTS 10 A SHORT HISTORY 10 PRESENT DAY 11 RED ALDER STANDS 13 BIG LEAF MAPLE / RED ALDER STANDS 14 DECIDUOUS / CONIFEROUS MIXED STANDS 15 CONIFEROUS STANDS 15 WILDLIFE 15 MIGRATORY BIRDS 15 RESIDENT SPECIES 16 3. -
Living Blues 2021 Festival Guide
Compiled by Melanie Young Specific dates are provided where possible. However, some festivals had not set their 2021 dates at press time. Due to COVID-19, some dates are tentative. Please contact the festivals directly for the latest information. You can also view this list year-round at www.LivingBlues.com. Living Blues Festival Guide ALABAMA Foley BBQ & Blues Cook-Off March 13, 2021 Blues, Bikes & BBQ Festival Juneau Jazz & Classics Heritage Park TBA TBA Foley, Alabama Alabama International Dragway Juneau, Alaska 251.943.5590 2021Steele, Alabama 907.463.3378 www.foleybbqandblues.net www.bluesbikesbbqfestival.eventbrite.com jazzandclassics.org W.C. Handy Music Festival Johnny Shines Blues Festival Spenard Jazz Fest July 16-27, 2021 TBA TBA Florence, Alabama McAbee Activity Center Anchorage, Alaska 256.766.7642 Tuscaloosa, Alabama spenardjazzfest.org wchandymusicfestival.com 205.887.6859 23rd Annual Gulf Coast Ethnic & Heritage Jazz Black Belt Folk Roots Festival ARIZONA Festival TBA Chandler Jazz Festival July 30-August 1, 2021 Historic Greene County Courthouse Square Mobile, Alabama April 8-10, 2021 Eutaw, Alabama Chandler, Arizona 251.478.4027 205.372.0525 gcehjazzfest.org 480.782.2000 blackbeltfolkrootsfestival.weebly.com chandleraz.gov/special-events Spring Fling Cruise 2021 Alabama Blues Week October 3-10, 2021 Woodystock Blues Festival TBA May 8-9, 2021 Carnival Glory Cruise from New Orleans, Louisiana Tuscaloosa, Alabama to Montego Bay, Jamaica, Grand Cayman Islands, Davis Camp Park 205.752.6263 Bullhead City, Arizona and Cozumel, -
The Artists' View of Seattle
WHERE DOES SEATTLE’S CREATIVE COMMUNITY GO FOR INSPIRATION? Allow us to introduce some of our city’s resident artists, who share with you, in their own words, some of their favorite places and why they choose to make Seattle their home. Known as one of the nation’s cultural centers, Seattle has more arts-related businesses and organizations per capita than any other metropolitan area in the United States, according to a recent study by Americans for the Arts. Our city pulses with the creative energies of thousands of artists who call this their home. In this guide, twenty-four painters, sculptors, writers, poets, dancers, photographers, glass artists, musicians, filmmakers, actors and more tell you about their favorite places and experiences. James Turrell’s Light Reign, Henry Art Gallery ©Lara Swimmer 2 3 BYRON AU YONG Composer WOULD YOU SHARE SOME SPECIAL CHILDHOOD MEMORIES ABOUT WHAT BROUGHT YOU TO SEATTLE? GROWING UP IN SEATTLE? I moved into my particular building because it’s across the street from Uptown I performed in musical theater as a kid at a venue in the Seattle Center. I was Espresso. One of the real draws of Seattle for me was the quality of the coffee, I nine years old, and I got paid! I did all kinds of shows, and I also performed with must say. the Civic Light Opera. I was also in the Northwest Boy Choir and we sang this Northwest Medley, and there was a song to Ivar’s restaurant in it. When I was HOW DOES BEING A NON-DRIVER IMPACT YOUR VIEW OF THE CITY? growing up, Ivar’s had spokespeople who were dressed up in clam costumes with My favorite part about walking is that you come across things that you would pass black leggings. -
National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form
NPS Form 10-900-b OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (formerly 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. ___X___ New Submission ________ Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Seattle’s Olmsted Parks and Boulevards (1903–68) B. Associated Historic Contexts None C. Form Prepared by: name/title: Chrisanne Beckner, MS, and Natalie K. Perrin, MS organization: Historical Research Associates, Inc. (HRA) street & number: 1904 Third Ave., Suite 240 city/state/zip: Seattle, WA 98101 e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] telephone: (503) 247-1319 date: December 15, 2016 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR 60 and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation. _______________________________ ______________________ _________________________ Signature of certifying official Title Date _____________________________________ State or Federal Agency or Tribal government I hereby certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing in the National Register. -
City of Seattle Edward B
City of Seattle Edward B. Murray, Mayor Finance and Administrative Services Fred Podesta, Director July 25, 2016 The Honorable Tim Burgess Seattle City Hall 501 5th Ave. Seattle, WA 98124 Councilmember Burgess, Attached is an annual report of all real property under City ownership. The annual review supports strategic management of the City’s real estate holdings. Because City needs change over time, the annual review helps create opportunities to find the best municipal use of each property or put it back into the private sector to avoid holding properties without an adopted municipal purpose. Each January, FAS initiates the annual review process. City departments with jurisdiction over real property assure that all recent acquisitions and/or dispositions are accurately represented, and provide current information about each property’s current use, and future use, if identified. Each property is classified based on its level of utilization -- from Fully Utilized Municipal Use to Surplus. In addition, in 2015 and 2016, in conjunction with CBO, OPI, and OH, FAS has been reviewing properties with the HALA recommendation on using surplus property for housing. The attached list has a new column that groups excess, surplus, underutilized and interim use properties into categories to help differentiate the potential for various sites. Below is a matrix which explains the categorization: Category Description Difficult building site Small, steep and/or irregular parcels with limited development opportunity Future Use Identified use in the future -
Seattle Small Lakes
City of Seattle State of the Waters 2007 Volume II: Small Lakes State of the Waters 2007 Volume II Table of Contents Part 1 Introduction .............................................................................................1 Understanding the State of Seattle Waters.............................................................................................. 1 Contents of the State of the Waters Report............................................................................................. 2 Overview of Seattle-Area Water Bodies................................................................................................. 3 Watercourses and Streams ................................................................................................................ 3 Lakes................................................................................................................................................. 3 Estuaries............................................................................................................................................ 4 Marine Ecosystems........................................................................................................................... 4 Part 2 A Brief Primer on Lake Ecosystems..........................................................7 Lake Ecosystem Processes ..................................................................................................................... 7 Trophic Status and Eutrophication...................................................................................................