Seattle Small Lakes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Seattle Small Lakes City of Seattle State of the Waters 2007 Volume II: Small Lakes State of the Waters 2007 Volume II Table of Contents Part 1 Introduction .............................................................................................1 Understanding the State of Seattle Waters.............................................................................................. 1 Contents of the State of the Waters Report............................................................................................. 2 Overview of Seattle-Area Water Bodies................................................................................................. 3 Watercourses and Streams ................................................................................................................ 3 Lakes................................................................................................................................................. 3 Estuaries............................................................................................................................................ 4 Marine Ecosystems........................................................................................................................... 4 Part 2 A Brief Primer on Lake Ecosystems..........................................................7 Lake Ecosystem Processes ..................................................................................................................... 7 Trophic Status and Eutrophication.................................................................................................... 8 7KHUPDO6WUDWL¿FDWLRQ ....................................................................................................................... 9 Lake Zonation................................................................................................................................. 10 Disruptions to Lake Ecosystems........................................................................................................... 12 Altered Hydrology.......................................................................................................................... 13 Water Quality.................................................................................................................................. 13 Sediment Quality ............................................................................................................................ 14 Sediment Dynamics........................................................................................................................ 14 Shoreline Connectivity ................................................................................................................... 14 Nonnative Species .......................................................................................................................... 15 Part 3 Assessing the State of the Waters .........................................................17 Water and Sediment Quality Assessment Methods .............................................................................. 17 Water Quality Indicators................................................................................................................. 17 Data Compilation............................................................................................................................ 18 Data Quality Assurance Review ..................................................................................................... 19 Data Analysis.................................................................................................................................. 20 Habitat Assessment Methods................................................................................................................ 24 Part 4 Conditions in Seattle’s Small Lakes........................................................25 Bitter Lake ............................................................................................................................................ 25 Water and Sediment Quality Conditions ........................................................................................ 27 Habitat Conditions.......................................................................................................................... 33 Green Lake ........................................................................................................................................... 34 Water Quality Conditions ............................................................................................................... 36 Sediment Quality Conditions.......................................................................................................... 40 Habitat Conditions.......................................................................................................................... 43 Table of Contents i City of Seattle State of the Waters 2007 Volume II: Small Lakes Haller Lake ........................................................................................................................................... 48 Water Quality Conditions ............................................................................................................... 50 Habitat Conditions.......................................................................................................................... 51 Part 5 Small Lakes Comparison and Conclusions .............................................53 Water and Sediment Quality Conditions .............................................................................................. 54 Habitat Conditions................................................................................................................................ 55 Part 6 References and Glossary ........................................................................57 References and Information Sources.................................................................................................... 57 Glossary of Terms................................................................................................................................. 61 ii Table of Contents City of Seattle State of the Waters 2007 Volume II: Small Lakes Tables 7DEOH 8VHVDQGEHQH¿WVRI6HDWWOHODNHVDQGZDWHUTXDOLW\LQGLFDWRUVRIODNHFRQGLWLRQV............18 7DEOH :DWHUTXDOLW\GDWDVRXUFHVIRU6HDWWOH¶VVPDOOODNHV............................................................19 7DEOH %HQH¿FLDOXVHGHVLJQDWLRQVDSSOLFDEOHWR6HDWWOH¶VVPDOOODNHVXQGHUVWDWH ZDWHUTXDOLW\VWDQGDUGV ........................................................................................................21 7DEOH 7URSKLFVWDWHLQGH[YDOXHVXVHGWRDVVHVVODNHZDWHUTXDOLW\FRQGLWLRQV.............................22 Table 5. Bitter Lake metals concentrations sampled during a storm event compared to human health risk criteria. ....................................................................................................29 Table 6. Bitter Lake organic compounds detected in stormwater samples. .......................................29 Table 7. Bitter Lake sediment metals concentrations compared to freshwater sediment guidelines..............................................................................................................................30 Table 8. Bitter Lake sediment organic compounds concentrations compared to freshwater sediment guidelines. ...........................................................................................31 7DEOH *UHHQ/DNHZDWHUTXDOLW\GDWDIRU0D\±6HSWHPEHU...................................................38 7DEOH*UHHQ/DNHVXPPHUIHFDOFROLIRUPEDFWHULDOHYHOV± .........................................39 Table 11. Green Lake sediment metals concentrations compared to freshwater sediment guidelines. .............................................................................................................41 Table 12. Green Lake sampling stations with exceedances of freshwater sediment guidelines. .............................................................................................................42 Table 13. Green Lake sediment organic compounds concentrations compared to freshwater sediment guidelines....................................................................................... 44-45 Table 14. Haller Lake drainage sample results from Meridian storm drain compared to other Seattle stormwater data. ..........................................................................................51 7DEOH&RPSDULVRQVRIZDWHUTXDOLW\DQGVHGLPHQWTXDOLW\FRQGLWLRQVLQ6HDWWOH¶V small lakes. ...........................................................................................................................53 7DEOH/LVWLQJVRI6HDWWOH¶VVPDOOODNHVDVWKUHDWHQHGRULPSDLUHGZDWHUERGLHV under Clean Water Act Section 303(d). ................................................................................54 Figures Figure 1. Seattle small lakes. .................................................................................................................5 Figure 2. Conceptual model of oligotrophic and eutrophic lake ecosystems. .......................................8 Figure 3. Conceptual model of the seasonal thermocline in lakes.........................................................9 Figure 4. Bitter Lake. ...........................................................................................................................26 )LJXUH %LWWHU/DNHZDWHUTXDOLW\PRQLWRULQJGDWDVXPPDU\IRU±
Recommended publications
  • Development Site in Seattle's Wallingford Neighborhood
    DEVELOPMENT SITE IN SEATTLE’S WALLINGFORD NEIGHBORHOOD INVESTMENT OVERVIEW 906 N 46th Street Seattle, Washington Property Highlights • The property is centrally located at the junction of three • 10 minutes to Downtown Seattle of the most desirable neighborhoods in Seattle: Phinney • Major employers within 10 minutes: University of Ridge, Fremont and Green Lake. Home prices in these Washington, Google, Amazon, Tableau, Facebook, Pemco neighborhoods range from $678,000 to $785,000, all Insurance and Nordstrom. above the city average of $626,000. • Site sits at the intersection of major bus line; Rapid Ride • 0.11 acres or 5,000 SF, tax parcel 952110-1310 runs both north and south on Aurora Avenue and the 44 • Zoned C1-40 runs east and west on 46th/45th Avenue. Employment • One of the largest employers in the • New Seattle development to add state of Washington 30,000+ jobs • 30,000+ full-time employees • 1,900+ full-time employees • 3 minutes from site • 2 minutes from site • Largest private employer in the Seattle • Business intelligence and analytics Metro area software headquarters in Seattle • 25,000+ full-time employees • 1,200+ full-time employees • 2 minutes from site • 2 minutes from site • Running shoe/apparel headquartered • One of ten office locations in North next to Gas Works Park America with a focus on IT support • 1,000+ full-time employees • 1,000+ full-time employees • 2 minutes from site • 2 minutes from site Dining and Retail Nearby Attractions Zoning C1-40 (Commercial 1) Wallingford district is within minutes of The 90-acre Woodland Park lies just north An auto-oriented, primarily retail/ many of Seattle's most popular attractions of Wallingford’s northern border, and service commercial area that serves and shopping areas.
    [Show full text]
  • SR 520, I-5 to Medina: Bridge Replacement and HOV Project Area Encompasses One of the Most Diverse and Complex Human and Natural Landscapes in the Puget Sound Region
    Chapter 4: The Project Area’s Environment Chapter 4: The Project Area’s Environment The SR 520, I-5 to Medina: Bridge Replacement and HOV Project area encompasses one of the most diverse and complex human and natural landscapes in the Puget Sound region. It includes areas in Seattle from I-5 to the Lake Washington shore, the waters of Lake Washington, and a portion of the Eastside communities and neighborhoods from the eastern shoreline of the lake to Evergreen Point Road. It also includes densely developed urban and suburban areas and some of the most critical natural areas and sensitive ecosystems that remain in the urban growth area. The project area includes the following: ▪ Seattle neighborhoods—Eastlake, Portage Bay/Roanoke, North Capitol Hill, Montlake, University District, Laurelhurst, and Madison Park ▪ The Lake Washington ecosystem and the bays, streams, and wetlands that are associated with it ▪ The Eastside community of Medina ▪ Usual and accustomed fishing areas of the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, who have historically used the area’s fisheries resources and has treaty rights for their protection and use This chapter describes what the project area is like today, setting the stage for the project’s effects described in Chapters 5 and 6. 4.1 Transportation The configuration of SR 520 today, with its inadequate shoulders and gaps in HOV lanes, makes the corridor especially prone to traffic congestion. And, as commuters on SR 520 know, the corridor is overloaded with traffic on a regular basis. Population and employment continue to grow both on the Eastside and in Seattle, resulting in new travel patterns and a steady rise in the number of vehicles crossing the Evergreen Point Bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Kark's Canoeing and Kayaking Guide to 309 Wisconsin Streams
    Kark's Canoeing and Kayaking Guide to 309 Wisconsin Streams By Richard Kark May 2015 Introduction A Badger Stream Love Affair My fascination with rivers started near my hometown of Osage, Iowa on the Cedar River. High school buddies and I fished the river and canoe-camped along its lovely limestone bluffs. In 1969 I graduated from St. Olaf College in Minnesota and soon paddled my first Wisconsin stream. With my college sweetheart I spent three days and two nights canoe- camping from Taylors Falls to Stillwater on the St. Croix River. “Sweet Caroline” by Neil Diamond blared from our transistor radio as we floated this lovely stream which was designated a National Wild and Scenic River in 1968. Little did I know I would eventually explore more than 300 other Wisconsin streams. In the late 1970s I was preoccupied by my medical studies in Milwaukee but did find the time to explore some rivers. I recall canoeing the Oconto, Chippewa, Kickapoo, “Illinois Fox,” and West Twin Rivers during those years. Several of us traveled to the Peshtigo River and rafted “Roaring Rapids” with a commercial company. At the time I could not imagine riding this torrent in a canoe. We also rafted Piers Gorge on the Menomonee River. Our guide failed to avoid Volkswagen Rock over Mishicot Falls. We flipped and I experienced the second worst “swim” of my life. Was I deterred from whitewater? Just the opposite, it seems. By the late 1970s I was a practicing physician, but I found time for Wisconsin rivers. In 1979 I signed up for the tandem whitewater clinic run by the River Touring Section of the Sierra Club’s John Muir Chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • Discover the Possibilities Seattle Children’S Livable Streets Initiative
    Livable Streets Workshop Discover the Possibilities Seattle Children’s Livable Streets Initiative For more information: Thank you to our Community Co-Sponsors http://construction.seattlechildrens.org/livablestreets/ Bicycle Alliance of Washington Cascade Bicycle Club Paulo Nunes-Ueno Feet First Director | Transportation Hawthorne Hills Community Council Seattle Children’s ITE UW Student Chapter 206-987-5908 Laurelhurst Community Club [email protected] Laurelhurst Elementary PTA Laurelhurst Elementary Safe Routes to School Public Health Seattle & King County Seattle Community Council Federation Seattle Department of Transportation Seattle Parks Foundation Sierra Club - Cascade Chapter Streets for All Seattle Sustainable Northeast Seattle Transportation Choices Coalition Transportation Northwest Undriving.org View Ridge Community Council Wedgwood Community Council 2 Table of Contents Seattle Children’s Livable Streets Initiative Safe crossings of major arterials What is Seattle Children’s Livable Streets Initiative?.....……4 Theme map: Safe crossings of major arterials ..………..…19 Public Involvement …..…….………..………………………...6 Project 7: NE 52nd St & Sand Point Way NE: Potential Projects themes and map …..…....…….………….7 Pedestrian crossing signal …………………......………...20 Project 8: 40th Ave NE & Sand Point Way NE: New signal and redesigned intersection…...……………21 Neighborhood Green Streets connecting Project 9: NE 45th St from 40th Ave NE to 47th Ave NE: parks, schools, and trails Crosswalks and curb bulbs.………...…………………….22 Project
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle Bicycle Master Plan
    PROJECTS FUNDED THROUGH DESIGN PROJECTS FUNDED THROUGH PLANNING 2019 TO 2024 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN SUMMARY Project Name Type Project Name Type NORTH SECTOR CENTRAL SECTOR Seattle Bicycle Master Plan VZ Interurban to Greenwood Connection NGW Center City - Alaskan Way (Virginia to Elliot Bay TBD Trail) FACT SHEET Summer 2019 Lake City/Maple Leaf Connection to Wedgwood NGW Central District: 12th Ave (King to Yesler) PBL SRTS Olympic Hills to Cedar Park NGW SOUTH SECTOR CENTRAL SECTOR Seattle’s Bicycle Master Plan (BMP) 2019 to 2024 Prior to finalizing the Implementation Plan, hundreds Beacon Ave S Segment 1 (S 39th St to S Myrtle St) PBL SRTS Stevens ES Connection NGW Implementation Plan invests $76 million over of people provided input and called for a southeast Beacon Ave S Segment 2 (S Myrtle St to S PBL Roosevelt Transit Plus Multimodal Corridor PBL six years making significant progress toward Seattle connection to downtown. As a result, Mayor Spokane St) connecting our bike network, including 50 miles Durkan directed SDOT to advance to construction a Lake Washington Loop NGW Beacon Ave S Segment 3 (S Spokane St to Jose PBL / NGW of new bike facilities and 29 miles of new projects project on Martin Luther King, Jr Way S from I-90 to SOUTH SECTOR Rizal Bridge) funded through design and planning. at least Rainier Ave S and to advance planning for a SRTS Orca K-8 Connection NGW Georgetown to Downtown facility TBD route along Beacon Ave S from the Jose Rizal Bridge Georgetown to South Park PBL / Trail Martin Luther King, Jr Blvd (Rainier to Henderson) TBD The plan will transform how people move around to S 39th St.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Lake National Fish Hatchery Recreational Fishing
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Green Lake National Fish Hatchery Draft Recreational Fishing Plan April 2021 Appendix A – Environmental Assessment Estimated Lead Agency Total Costs Associated with Developing and Producing the EA (per ERM 10-12): $7,495 Green Lake National Fish Hatchery [DRAFT] Recreational Fishing Plan April 2021 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Green Lake National Fish Hatchery 1 Hatchery Way Ellsworth, ME 04605 Submitted: Project Leader Date Concurrence: Complex Manager Date Approved: Assistant Regional Director, Fish and Aquatic Conservation Date Green Lake National Fish Hatchery - Draft Recreational Fishing Plan 2 Table of Contents I. Introduction 4 II. Statement Of Objectives 5 III. Description of Fishing Program 5 A. Areas to be Opened to Fishing 5 B. Species to be Taken, Fishing Seasons, Fishing Access 5 C. Fishing Permit Requirements 6 D. Consultation and Coordination with the State 6 E. Law Enforcement 6 F. Funding and Staff Requirements 7 IV. Conduct of the Fishing Program 7 A. Angler Permit Application, Selection, and/or Registration Procedures 7 C. Relevant State Regulations 8 D. Other Hatchery Rules and Regulations for Fishing 8 V. Public Engagement 8 A. Outreach for Announcing and Publicizing the Fishing Program 8 B. Anticipated Public Reaction to the Fishing Program 8 C. How Anglers Will Be Informed of Relevant Rules and Regulations 9 VI. Compatibility Determination 9 VII. References 9 VIII. Figures 10 Green Lake National Fish Hatchery - Draft Recreational Fishing Plan 3 I. Introduction The Green Lake National Fish Hatchery (NFH) is part of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (Service) Fish and Aquatic Conservation (FAC) program.
    [Show full text]
  • Church Profile
    CHURCH PROFILE 503 North 50th St. Seattle, WA 98103 | www.emmanuelphinneyridge.org HISTORY When Emmanuel Tabernacle first laid it’s cornerstone on August 24, 1930, the Seattle Daily Times declared it to be a “Modern Church”. Perhaps it was the staggering price tag for the building ($35,000) in the midst of our country’s worst financial crisis that caused them to label it as such. However, when a thriving congregation of faithful young families soon filled those pews it was clear what that journalist had understood all along, Emmanuel was a church built for changing times. Now, nearly 85 years departed from the early days of Emmanuel, it is amazing to see how the story of this church played out through the years. Sunday school ministry was at first the focus of Emmanuel, building up a new generation to deal with troubling times in America and abroad. With a world at war, children and their young families learned that in order to serve a God as big as ours you must be willing go to all corners of the earth to spread the Good News of peace. Emmanuel would shift its ministry focus post-war toward World missions, at one time supporting over sixty missionaries across the globe. At its peak in the mid-1980s, this church was regarded as a leader among Seattle faith communities, with well over 1,200 regular attendees, along with the continued children’s and missions programs. We have changed over the years: we are now much smaller without children running around the building as was the case in the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Lake/ Wallingford Area: 043 Residential Revalue for 2020 Assessment Roll
    Green Lake/ Wallingford Area: 043 Residential Revalue for 2020 Assessment Roll http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Lake_(Seattle) Department of Assessments Setting values, serving the community, and pursuing excellence 500 Fourth Avenue, ADM-AS 0708 Seattle, WA 98104-2384 OFFICE (206) 296-7300 FAX (206) 296-0595 Email: [email protected] http://www.kingcounty.gov/assessor/ Department of Assessments 500 Fourth Avenue, ADM-AS-0708 John Wilson Seattle, WA 98104-2384 Assessor OFFICE: (206) 296-7300 FAX (206) 296-0595 Email: [email protected] http://www.kingcounty.gov/assessor/ Dear Property Owners, Our field appraisers work hard throughout the year to visit properties in neighborhoods across King County. As a result, new commercial and residential valuation notices are mailed as values are completed. We value your property at its “true and fair value” reflecting its highest and best use as prescribed by state law (RCW 84.40.030; WAC 458-07-030). We continue to work to implement your feedback and ensure we provide you accurate and timely information. We have made significant improvements to our website and online tools to make interacting with us easier. The following report summarizes the results of the assessments for your area along with a map. Additionally, I have provided a brief tutorial of our property assessment process. It is meant to provide you with background information about our process and the basis for the assessments in your area. Fairness, accuracy and transparency set the foundation for effective and accountable government. I am pleased to continue to incorporate your input as we make ongoing improvements to serve you.
    [Show full text]
  • SR 520 I-5 to Medina
    Attachment 9 Conceptual Wetlands Mitigation Plan Conceptual Wetland Mitigation Report SR 520, I-5 to Medina: Bridge Replacement and HOV Project Prepared for Washington State Department of Transportation and Federal Highway Administration February 2011 Conceptual Wetland Mitigation Report SR 520, I-5 to Medina: Bridge Replacement and HOV Project February 2011 Prepared By: Patrick Togher, PWS (HDR Engineering, Inc.) Beth Peterson, PE (HDR Engineering, Inc.) Maki Dalzell, (Wetland Scientist, HDR Engineering, Inc.) Other Contributors and Role: Shane Cherry (Mitigation Discipline Lead, Confluence Environmental Company) Jeff Meyer, PWS (Sr. Wetland Biologist, Parametrix, Inc.) Ken Sargent (Wetland Biologist, Headwaters Environmental Consulting, Inc.) 1 Executive Summary 2 The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) is proposing to construct the I-5 3 to Medina: Bridge Replacement and HOV Project (SR 520, I-5 to Medina Project) to reduce 4 transit and high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) travel times and to replace the aging spans of the 5 Portage Bay and Evergreen Point bridges, which are highly vulnerable to windstorms and 6 earthquakes. The project will also widen the State Route (SR) 520 corridor to six lanes from I-5 7 in Seattle to Evergreen Point Road in Medina, and will restripe and reconfigure the lanes in the 8 corridor from Evergreen Point Road to 92nd Avenue NE in Yarrow Point. The project will 9 complete the regional HOV lane system across SR 520, as called for in regional and local 10 transportation plans. 11 The SR 520, I-5 to Medina: Bridge Replacement and HOV Project (SR 520, I-5 to Medina 12 Project) extends approximately 5.2 miles, from the interchange at I-5 in Seattle eastward to 13 Evergreen Point Road in Medina, on the east side of Lake Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • CSOV 120 Spring 2021 Languages of Our Ancestors
    University of Washington - 2021 Urban Forest Symposium CHESHIAHUD TALKS: Historical Union Bay Forests A Family Generational View on Being Connected & Responsibility Prepared By: Jeffrey Thomas (Muckleshoot Tribal Elder; UW B.S. Zoology, M.Sc. Marine Affairs) Director: Timber, Fish & Wildlife Program/Puyallup Tribe of Indians (253) 405-7478 [email protected] ** Disclaimer – All of the photographic and timeline information assembled herein was collected from currently available digital internet sources - and thus may be inaccurate - depending upon the veracity of the sources. CHIEF DESCENDANTS Pre-1850s: Treaty Maps • 1820 – Lake John Cheshiahud born on southern Union Bay village – this was a vital passage from the coast into the lakes and river system all the way up to Issaquah and beyond. ➢ Duwamish people traveling by canoe had access to waterway connections unavailable to larger Euro-American vessels. ➢ Lake John reported to have “…a cabin on Lake Union across from the University grounds…Lake John used to take pelts to the trading station at Steilacoom before Seattle was thought of.” 1850s: Union Bay Map 1856 & Chief Cheshiahud Village Site • 1851 – Denny Party arrives to begin claiming Duwamish homelands – including Lake Union. • 1853: Washington Territory established. • 1854 – Seattle’s 1st school opens as a private/tuition school (on 1st and Madison) – then moves but continues to operate until 1861…when students were sent to classes in the new building of the Territorial University. The first year of the Territorial University, there were 37 students, of which 36 were below college level. • 1854 – Washington Territorial Legislature outlaws Non- Native men marrying Native women (but legalizes it again in 1868).
    [Show full text]
  • Landslide Study
    Department of Planning and Development Seattle Landslide Study TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PREFACE 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose 1.2 Scope of Services 1.3 Report Organization 1.4 Authorization 1.5 Limitations PART 1. LANDSLIDE INVENTORY AND ANALYSES 2.0 GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS 2.1 Topography 2.2 Stratigraphy 2.2.1 Tertiary Bedrock 2.2.2 Pre-Vashon Deposits 2.2.3 Vashon Glacial Deposits 2.2.4 Holocene Deposits 2.3 Groundwater and Wet Weather 3.0 METHODOLOGY 3.1 Data Sources 3.2 Data Description 3.2.1 Landslide Identification 3.2.2 Landslide Characteristics 3.2.3 Stratigraphy (Geology) 3.2.4 Landslide Trigger Mechanisms 3.2.5 Roads and Public Utility Impact 3.2.6 Damage and Repair (Mitigation) 3.3 Data Processing 4.0 LANDSLIDES 4.1 Landslide Types 4.1.1 High Bluff Peeloff 4.1.2 Groundwater Blowout 4.1.3 Deep-Seated Landslides 4.1.4 Shallow Colluvial (Skin Slide) 4.2 Timing of Landslides 4.3 Landslide Areas 4.4 Causes of Landslides 4.5 Potential Slide and Steep Slope Areas PART 2. GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATIONS 5.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 5.1 Purpose of Geotechnical Evaluations 5.2 Scope of Geotechnical Evaluations 6.0 TYPICAL IMPROVEMENTS RELATED TO LANDSLIDE TYPE 6.1 Geologic Conditions that Contribute to Landsliding and Instability 6.2 Typical Approaches to Improve Stability 6.3 High Bluff Peeloff Landslides 6.4 Groundwater Blowout Landslides 6.5 Deep-Seated Landslides 6.6 Shallow Colluvial Landslides 7.0 DETAILS REGARDING IMPROVEMENTS 7.1 Surface Water Improvements 7.1.1 Tightlines 7.1.2 Surface Water Systems - Maintenance
    [Show full text]
  • Bitter Lake PF Lighting Replacement WC2310
    Planning & Development Division 20017 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (modified from 2007 Program) Design Program for Bitter Lake PF Lighting Replacement WC2310 November 30, 2017 I. INTRODUCTION A. PROJECT SUMMARY TITLE: BITTER LAKE PF LIGHTING REPLACEMENT LOCATION: 13035 Linden Ave N, Seattle 98133 NW District . PROJECT SCOPE: BITTER LAKE PF LIGHTING REPLACEMENT Replace old field lighting with a new efficient system on ballfields #1, #2, and the soccer field that meets desired illumination levels but also minimizes glare per City Code. The system shall meet Department maintenance standards within the authorized budget, to be constructed in July 2019 SCHEDULE: Consultant Selection and Contracts…………December 2017 Design and Permitting……………………Jan 2018 - Feb 2019 Bid, Award and order materials…….March 2019 Construction……............................. July 2019 CONSTRUCTION BUDGET: $500,000 SOURCE: Cumulative Reserve Fund (CRF) funded within Program K732310 – Ballfields/Athletic Courts/Play Areas B. BACKGROUND 1. Bitter Lake History – Bitter Lake covers 19 acres and has a maximum depth of 31 feet. It is fed by springs as well as from surface storm drainage from the northwest. Bitter Lake was formed from part of the melt-off from the Vashon Glacial Ice Sheet which left several depressions including Bitter Lake, Haller Lake and Green Lake, part of a large north-south drainage basin whose water flows southeast, emptying into Lake Washington. Bitter Lake settlement started with a logging mill. As a log holding pond, the lake water became astringent Page 2 of 15 Final Design Program Bitter Lake PF Lighting Replacement 2017 CIP Project # WC 2310 November, 2017 with tannic acid, enough to make the water so unpleasant that horses refused to drink; hence the name “Bitter Lake”.
    [Show full text]