DOCSLIB.ORG

The Nitidulidae and Kateretidae of Sardinia: Recent Data and Updated Checklist (Coleoptera) *

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Nitidulidae and Kateretidae of Sardinia: Recent Data and Updated Checklist (Coleoptera) * ConseRVaZione haBitat inVeRteBRati 5: 447–460 (2011) CnBfVR The Nitidulidae and Kateretidae of Sardinia: recent data and updated checklist ( Coleoptera)* Paolo AUDISIO Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie "Charles Darwin", Sapienza Università di Roma, Via A. Borelli 50, I-00161 Rome, Italy. E-mail: [email protected] *In: Nardi G., Whitmore D., Bardiani M., Birtele D., Mason F., Spada L. & Cerretti P. (eds), Biodiversity of Marganai and Montimannu (Sardinia). Research in the framework of the ICP Forests network. Conservazione Habitat Invertebrati, 5: 447–460. ABSTRACT This paper deals with the Coleoptera Nitidulidae and Kateretidae collected in Sardinia during the surveys organized by Centro Nazionale per lo Studio e la Conservazione della Biodiversità Forestale "Bosco Fontana" of Verona in 2003–2008, with a few selected additional data collected on the island by the author during entomological trips carried out in 1982–2008, and by several Italian and European entomologists in the last few decades. The paper is also completed with the updated checklist of the species so far recorded from the island, including those based on a few unpublished data or extracted from recently examined material. 79 species (73 Nitidulidae, including 10 the presence of which is based only on very doubtful ancient records, and 6 Kateretidae) are listed for Sardinia. The updated list includes two species endemic to the Corso-Sardinian System: Sagittogethes nuragicus (Audisio & Jelínek, 1990), and Thymogethes foddaii (Audisio, De Biase & Trizzino, 2009) n. comb. Sagittogethes minutus (C. Brisout de Barneville, 1872) is recorded for the fi rst time from continental Italy (SE Calabria). Key words: Nitidulidae, Kateretidae, Sardinia, faunistics. RIASSUNTO Checklist aggiornata e dati recenti sui Nitidulidi e Cateretidi della Sardegna (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae, Kateretidae) In questo contributo vengono riassunti i dati sui Coleoptera Nitidulidae e Kateretidae raccolti in Sardegna durante le ricerche organizzate dal Centro Nazionale per lo Studio e la Conservazione della Biodiversità Forestale "Bosco Fontana" di Verona negli anni tra il 2003 e il 2008, oltre ad alcuni dati di presenza sull'Isola desunti da missioni di raccolta sul campo effettuate dall'autore negli anni tra il 1982 e il 2008, e da numerosi altri entomologi italiani ed europei nei più recenti decenni. Complessivamente sono elencate 73 specie di Nitidulidae (10 delle quali riportate però sulla sola base di antiche e dubbie citazioni) e 6 di Kateretidae, tra cui i due rari endemiti sardo-corsi Sagittogethes nuragicus (Audisio & Jelínek, 1990), e Thymogethes foddaii (Audisio, De Biase & Trizzino, 2009) n. comb. L'elenco è integrato con la checklist di tutte le specie fi nora segnalate per la Sardegna e con alcuni altri dati inediti, desunti dall'esame di materiale museale e di collezioni private. Sagittogethes minutus (C. Brisout de Barneville, 1872) è segnalato per la prima volta per l'Italia continentale (SE Calabria). INTRODUCTION prey on scale-insects (Silvestri 1910; Endrödy-Younga 1968). The Kateretidae are mostly anthophagous, but The families Nitidulidae and Kateretidae (Audisio a few species are spermophagous (Audisio 1993). 1993; Angelini et al. 1995; Jelínek & Audisio 2007; The systematic knowledge of the Italian species Audisio & Jelínek 2011) are represented by more of Nitidulidae and Kateretidae is good, especially than 200 species in Italy. following the publication of the volume of the series Many species of Nitidulidae are strictly or prevalent- "Fauna d'Italia" (Audisio 1993), with the single ly phytophagous or phytosaprophagous, spending exception of the subfamily Cybocephalinae (as most of their life cycle on plants, fl owers, or on de- considered by Jelínek & Audisio 2007), previously caying organic material such as fungi, fruits, sap, or considered as a separate family and for this reason not (only a few species) carrion. Within the Nitidulidae, treated by Audisio (1993). To my knowledge, nobody the Meligethinae are strictly anthophagous (Audisio except the writer has specifi cally collected extensively 1993; Audisio et al. 2009a), while the Cybocephalinae these beetles in Sardinia, or the results of such studies 447 Paolo audisio have not been published; the Sardinian fauna of these ing to the categories of Vigna Taglianti et al. (1993, beetles is therefore mainly known from the ancient 1999) and the distributions provided in Audisio generic regional records provided by Bargagli (1871, (1993), Angelini et al. (1995), Jelínek (2007), Jelínek 1872), Bertolini (1904), Luigioni (1929), and Porta & Audisio (2007), Audisio & Jelínek (2011), and any (1929). Besides these generic citations there are only relevant notes or citation following the publication few literature records where a detailed locality is of Audisio's (1993) monograph and Audisio & De provided (cf. Audisio & Jelínek 1990; Audisio & De Biase's (2005) data-base, are given. Biase 2005; Audisio et al. 2009b). Records collected by CNBFVR staff (2003–2008) are listed as follows: alphanumerical abbreviation of the locality (for details of commune and province see MATERIAL AND METHODS the list of sampling sites below), date, collector, col- lecting method and habitat, number of specimens, The aim of this work is to provide an updated ac- and collection (in parenthesis). For generic informa- count of the presence and distribution of the families tion on the vegetation of the main study area sur- Nitidulidae and Kateretidae in Sardinia. It is partly veyed by CNBFVR (Monte Marganai), see Angius based on the results of field trips carried out in 2003– et al. (2011). For records taken from the literature 2008 by the CNBFVR staff (Centro Nazionale per lo the source is given after the mentioned locality or the Studio e la Conservazione della Biodiversità Forestale generic regional record. Provinces are cited consid- "Bosco Fontana" di Verona, Italy) (cf. Cerretti et al. ering the updated administrative subdivision includ- 2009; Bardiani 2011), and in years 1982–2008 by the ing, besides the previously established provinces of author of the present paper. The former collections Sassari, Nuoro, Oristano and Cagliari, the recently (see "CNBFVR records") were made mainly in the introduced provinces of Olbia-Tempio, Ogliastra, central-southern Sardinian provinces, the latter ones Medio Campidano and Carbonia-Iglesias. (see "Other records") mainly in the central-northern Genera and species are all listed in alphabetical order. provinces. Sampling by CNBFVR was prevalently carried out in open or forest habitats with the aid of sweep netting, or using a wide series of alternative ABBREVIATIONS methods such as pitfall traps, window traps, Malaise traps, light traps, and other, as listed below. These samPling sites of CnBfVR field CamPaigns. C01 = Carbonia- data have been integrated with all available literature Iglesias prov., Iglesias, Case Marganai, 725 m, 32S 463890 records of regional presence. For many species (chief- 4355925; C03 = Carbonia-Iglesias prov., Iglesias, Vecchia ly the most common and widespread ones), several Cantoniera Marganai, 491 m, 32S 462272 4354677; C10 = additional detailed localities from Sardinia are known Medio Campidano prov., Villacidro, P.ta piscina Argiolas, 282 to the author, mostly derived from the inventory of m, 32S 472049 4360081; C11 = Medio Campidano prov., recently examined museum and private collections in Villacidro, Can.li Serci, 381 m, 32S 472208 4359497; C14 Italy and other European countries, but for reasons = Carbonia-Iglesias prov., Domusnovas, Sedda Pranu Cardu, of brevity only the most relevant unpublished data 549 m, 32S 470926 4358924; C16 = Carbonia-Iglesias prov., have been included in this paper. The list of taxa also Domusnovas, Gutturu Seu, 174 m, 32S 471577 4355716; C23 includes a few species doubtfully recorded from Sar- = Medio Campidano prov., Villacidro, Rio Cannisoni, radura dinia only basing on ancient literature citations (e.g., sponda sinistra, 401 m, 32S 468459 4362806; C26 = Carbonia- Bargagli 1871, 1872; Bertolini 1904; Luigioni 1929; Iglesias prov., Domusnovas, Bega d'Aleni, 621 m, 32S 467855 Porta 1929; Borchert 1938; Horion 1960). 4361336; C31 = Carbonia-Iglesias prov., Domusnovas, Lago The systematic-nomenclatural order followed is that Siuru, 322 m, 32S 467069 4357916; C32 = Medio Campidano of Jelínek (2007), Jelínek & Audisio (2007), Audisio prov., Villacidro, L. di Montimannu, diga, 255 m, 32S 475380 & Jelínek (2011) and, for the Nitidulid subfamily 363486; C36 = Medio Campidano prov., Villacidro, dint. L. Meligethinae, Audisio et al. (2009a), this implying di Montimannu, lungo T. Leni, 256 m, 32S 474156 4363150; the inclusion of the Cybocephalinae in the Nitiduli- C41 = Carbonia-Iglesias prov., Domusnovas, su Pranu Pirastu, dae (Bouchard et al. 2011), despite the systematic 147 m, 32S 471365 4353536; C46 = Medio Campidano prov., treatment of this taxon as an isolated subfamily of Villacidro, Rio Cannisoni, 400 m, 32S 468858 4362543; Nitidulidae or as separate family remains still contro- S1 = Carbonia-Iglesias prov., Iglesias, dint. colonia Beneck, versial (Audisio 1993). 636 m, 32S 462391 4355441; S2 = Carbonia-Iglesias prov., For each species, which are numbered consecutively, Domusnovas, sa Duchessa, 371 m, 32S 464990 4358384; S3 nomenclatural combinations, chorotype (accord- = Carbonia-Iglesias prov., Domusnovas, Valle Oridda, 592 m, 448 the nitidulidae and KateRetidae of saRdinia: ReCent data and uPdated CheCKlist (ColeoPteRa) 32S 466973
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Coleoptera, Cucujoidea, Nitidulidae
    Евразиатский энтомол. журнал 14(3): 276–284 © EUROASIAN ENTOMOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2015 Æóêè-áëåñòÿíêè (Coleoptera, Cucujoidea, Nitidulidae) ßðîñëàâñêîé îáëàñòè: ïîäñåìåéñòâà Carpophilinae, Cryptarchinae è Nitidulinae, ñ óêàçàíèÿìè íåêîòîðûõ äðóãèõ íîâûõ äëÿ ðåãèîíà âèäîâ æóêîâ èç ðàçíûõ ñåìåéñòâ Sap beetles (Coleoptera, Cucujoidea, Nitidulidae) of Yaroslavskaya Oblast’: subfamilies Carpophilinae, Cryptarchinae and Nitidulinae, together with new records of species from the other beetle families Ä.Â. Âëàñîâ*, Í.Á. Íèêèòñêèé** D.V. Vlasov*, N.B. Nikitsky** * Ярославский государственный историко-архитектурный и художественный музей-заповедник, Богоявленская пл. 25, Ярославль 15000 Россия. E-mail: [email protected]. * Yaroslavl State Historical and Architectural Museum-Reserve, Bogoyavlenskaya Sq. 25, Yaroslavl 150000 Russia. ** Зоологический музей МГУ им. М.В. Ломоносова, ул. Большая Никитская 6, Москва 125009 Россия. E-mai l: [email protected]. ** Zoological Museum of Moscow Lomonosov State University, Bolshaya Nikitskaya Str. 6, Moscow 125009 Russia. Ключевые слова: жуки-блестянки, Nitidulidae, Ярославская область, новые виды Ptinidae, Coccinellidae, Tenebrionidae, Scolytinae. Key words: sap beetles, Nitidulidae, Yaroslavskaya Oblast’, new species Ptinidae, Coccinellidae, Tenebrionidae, Scolytinae. Резюме. Статья посвящена изучению жуков-блестя- culinaris, and Curculionidae (Scolytinae), Trypophloeus bin- нок (Coleoptera, Nitidulidae) Ярославской области из под- odulus and Scolytus sulcifrons are recorded from the region семейств Carpophilinae, Cryptarchinae, Nitudulinae, а так- for the first time. же новым для региона видам ряда других семейств, которые являются дополнением к предшествующим пуб- Ярославская область расположена в центре Вос- ликациям. Из анализируемых групп блестянок в работу точно-Европейской равнины между 56°32' и 58°55'с.ш., включено 25 видов, три из которых являются новыми 37°21' и 41°12' в.д. и занимает часть бассейна Верхней для региона (Omosita discoidea, O.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae)
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 40 Numbers 3 & 4 - Fall/Winter 2007 Numbers 3 & Article 9 4 - Fall/Winter 2007 October 2007 An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae) Michele B. Price University of Wisconsin Daniel K. Young University of Wisconsin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Price, Michele B. and Young, Daniel K. 2007. "An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae)," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 40 (2) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol40/iss2/9 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Price and Young: An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Cole 2007 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 177 AN Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae) Michele B. Price1 and Daniel K. Young1 ABSTRACT The first comprehensive survey of Wisconsin Endomychidae was initiated in 1998. Throughout Wisconsin sampling sites were selected based on habitat type and sampling history. Wisconsin endomychids were hand collected from fungi and under tree bark; successful trapping methods included cantharidin- baited pitfall traps, flight intercept traps, and Lindgren funnel traps. Examina- tion of literature records, museum and private collections, and field research yielded 10 species, three of which are new state records. Two dubious records, Epipocus unicolor Horn and Stenotarsus hispidus (Herbst), could not be con- firmed.
    [Show full text]
  • Green-Tree Retention and Controlled Burning in Restoration and Conservation of Beetle Diversity in Boreal Forests
    Dissertationes Forestales 21 Green-tree retention and controlled burning in restoration and conservation of beetle diversity in boreal forests Esko Hyvärinen Faculty of Forestry University of Joensuu Academic dissertation To be presented, with the permission of the Faculty of Forestry of the University of Joensuu, for public criticism in auditorium C2 of the University of Joensuu, Yliopistonkatu 4, Joensuu, on 9th June 2006, at 12 o’clock noon. 2 Title: Green-tree retention and controlled burning in restoration and conservation of beetle diversity in boreal forests Author: Esko Hyvärinen Dissertationes Forestales 21 Supervisors: Prof. Jari Kouki, Faculty of Forestry, University of Joensuu, Finland Docent Petri Martikainen, Faculty of Forestry, University of Joensuu, Finland Pre-examiners: Docent Jyrki Muona, Finnish Museum of Natural History, Zoological Museum, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Docent Tomas Roslin, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Division of Population Biology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Opponent: Prof. Bengt Gunnar Jonsson, Department of Natural Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden ISSN 1795-7389 ISBN-13: 978-951-651-130-9 (PDF) ISBN-10: 951-651-130-9 (PDF) Paper copy printed: Joensuun yliopistopaino, 2006 Publishers: The Finnish Society of Forest Science Finnish Forest Research Institute Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry of the University of Helsinki Faculty of Forestry of the University of Joensuu Editorial Office: The Finnish Society of Forest Science Unioninkatu 40A, 00170 Helsinki, Finland http://www.metla.fi/dissertationes 3 Hyvärinen, Esko 2006. Green-tree retention and controlled burning in restoration and conservation of beetle diversity in boreal forests. University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry. ABSTRACT The main aim of this thesis was to demonstrate the effects of green-tree retention and controlled burning on beetles (Coleoptera) in order to provide information applicable to the restoration and conservation of beetle species diversity in boreal forests.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Japanese Kateretidae Fauna (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea)
    ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE Published 9.xii.2011 Volume 51(2), pp. 551–585 ISSN 0374-1036 A review of the Japanese Kateretidae fauna (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea) Sadatomo HISAMATSU Entomological Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Ehime University, Tarumi 3–5–7, Matsuyama, 790–8566 Japan; e–mail: [email protected] Abstract. The family Kateretidae of Japan is revised. Nine species belonging to 6 genera are recognized, including: Kateretes japonicus Hisamatsu, 1985, K. takagii S-T. Hisamatsu, 2006, Platamartus jakowlewi Reitter, 1892, Heterhelus (Heterhelus) scutellaris (Heer, 1841), H. (Heterhelus) morio (Reitter, 1878), H. (Boreades) solani (Heer, 1841), Sibirhelus corpulentus (Reitter, 1900), Brachyp- terus urticae (Fabricius, 1792), and Brachypterolus pulicarius (Linnaeus, 1758). Heterhelus morio, which was synonymized under H. scutellaris by KIREJTSHUK (1989), is found to be a valid species, and is herein resurrected. Platamartus jakowlewi is newly recorded from Japan. Brachypterolus shimoyamai Hisamatsu, 1985, syn. nov., is synonymized under Brachypterolus pulicarius. Dorsal habitus images, illustrations of male and female genitalia, and other important diagnostic characters are provided for all species. A key for identifi cation of all Japanese taxa is also provided. Key words. Coleoptera, Kateretidae, taxonomy, new synonym, new record, key, Japan, Palaearctic Region Introduction The family Kateretidae, belonging to the superfamily Cucujoidea, is mainly distributed in the Holarctic Region, and comprises about 95 species within 14 genera worldwide (JELÍNEK & CLINE 2010). Both larval and adult Kateretidae are anthophagous: the larvae are monophagous or oligophagous, while adults are more generalized feeders, occurring on true host plants only during mating and ovipositing periods; otherwise, they feed on a broader assortment of fl owering plants (JELÍNEK & CLINE 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • A Catalogue of Coleoptera Specimens with Potential Forensic Interest in the Goulandris Natural History Museum Collection
    ENTOMOLOGIA HELLENICA Vol. 25, 2016 A catalogue of Coleoptera specimens with potential forensic interest in the Goulandris Natural History Museum collection Dimaki Maria Goulandris Natural History Museum, 100 Othonos St. 14562 Kifissia, Greece Anagnou-Veroniki Maria Makariou 13, 15343 Aghia Paraskevi (Athens), Greece Tylianakis Jason Zoology Department, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/eh.11549 Copyright © 2017 Maria Dimaki, Maria Anagnou- Veroniki, Jason Tylianakis To cite this article: Dimaki, M., Anagnou-Veroniki, M., & Tylianakis, J. (2016). A catalogue of Coleoptera specimens with potential forensic interest in the Goulandris Natural History Museum collection. ENTOMOLOGIA HELLENICA, 25(2), 31-38. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/eh.11549 http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 27/12/2018 06:22:38 | ENTOMOLOGIA HELLENICA 25 (2016): 31-38 Received 15 March 2016 Accepted 12 December 2016 Available online 3 February 2017 A catalogue of Coleoptera specimens with potential forensic interest in the Goulandris Natural History Museum collection MARIA DIMAKI1’*, MARIA ANAGNOU-VERONIKI2 AND JASON TYLIANAKIS3 1Goulandris Natural History Museum, 100 Othonos St. 14562 Kifissia, Greece 2Makariou 13, 15343 Aghia Paraskevi (Athens), Greece 3Zoology Department, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand ABSTRACT This paper presents a catalogue of the Coleoptera specimens in the Goulandris Natural History Museum collection that have potential forensic interest. Forensic entomology can help to estimate the time elapsed since death by studying the necrophagous insects collected on a cadaver and its surroundings. In this paper forty eight species (369 specimens) are listed that belong to seven families: Silphidae (3 species), Staphylinidae (6 species), Histeridae (11 species), Anobiidae (4 species), Cleridae (6 species), Dermestidae (14 species), and Nitidulidae (4 species).
    [Show full text]
  • T1)E Bedford,1)Ire Naturaii,T 45
    T1)e Bedford,1)ire NaturaIi,t 45 Journal for the year 1990 Bedfordshire Natural History Society 1991 'ISSN 0951 8959 I BEDFORDSHffiE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY 1991 Chairman: Mr D. Anderson, 88 Eastmoor Park, Harpenden, Herts ALS 1BP Honorary Secretary: Mr M.C. Williams, 2 Ive! Close, Barton-le-Clay, Bedford MK4S 4NT Honorary Treasurer: MrJ.D. Burchmore, 91 Sundon Road, Harlington, Dunstable, Beds LUS 6LW Honorary Editor (Bedfordshire Naturalist): Mr C.R. Boon, 7 Duck End Lane, Maulden, Bedford MK4S 2DL Honorary Membership Secretary: Mrs M.]. Sheridan, 28 Chestnut Hill, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, Beds LU7 7TR Honorary Scientific Committee Secretary: Miss R.A. Brind, 46 Mallard Hill, Bedford MK41 7QS Council (in addition to the above): Dr A. Aldhous MrS. Cham DrP. Hyman DrD. Allen MsJ. Childs Dr P. Madgett MrC. Baker Mr W. Drayton MrP. Soper Honorary Editor (Muntjac): Ms C. Aldridge, 9 Cowper Court, Markyate, Herts AL3 8HR Committees appointed by Council: Finance: Mr]. Burchmore (Sec.), MrD. Anderson, Miss R. Brind, Mrs M. Sheridan, Mr P. Wilkinson, Mr M. Williams. Scientific: Miss R. Brind (Sec.), Mr C. Boon, Dr G. Bellamy, Mr S. Cham, Miss A. Day, DrP. Hyman, MrJ. Knowles, MrD. Kramer, DrB. Nau, MrE. Newman, Mr A. Outen, MrP. Trodd. Development: Mrs A. Adams (Sec.), MrJ. Adams (Chairman), Ms C. Aldridge (Deputy Chairman), Mrs B. Chandler, Mr M. Chandler, Ms]. Childs, Mr A. Dickens, MrsJ. Dickens, Mr P. Soper. Programme: MrJ. Adams, Mr C. Baker, MrD. Green, MrD. Rands, Mrs M. Sheridan. Trustees (appointed under Rule 13): Mr M. Chandler, Mr D. Green, Mrs B.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Carpophilus Beetle in Almonds
    JANUARY 2016 ALL ABOUT ALMONDS ORCHARD MANAGEMENT MANAGING CARPOPHILUS BEETLE IN ALMONDS PRELIMINARY MONITORING GUIDELINES, ATTRACT & KILL GUIDELINES FOR 2016 - 2017 SEASON CARPOPHILUS IN ALMONDS project includes research on the KEY POINTS distribution of different Carpophilus Carpophilus beetles comprise many species throughout orchards and in species with different preferences different almond growing regions, Almonds are most vulnerable to attack from for fruit type and fruit ripening/ testing whether the “stonefruit” lure Carpophilus Beetle during hull split. maturing stage. In recent years, is effective in almonds and how its Pheromone and co-attractant are much less almond growers have indicated potency might be improved, and effective when used separately rather than in significant crop losses due to determining the most effective combination. Carpophilus, and there is an urgent spacing of A&K traps to achieve need for an Attract and Kill (A&K) control. High priority blocks to monitor are likely to system that can control these This article contains information on include those that experience excessive pests, particularly in the ‘hull-split’ how best to apply an A&K strategy to moisture retention and humidity. development stage when almonds monitor and control Carpophilus in are most vulnerable to attack. During It is suggested that growers start with at least almonds using the current stonefruit the 2014/15 and 2015/16 seasons, one trap per orchard block (approx. 20 ha). lure. We consider this an interim five species of Carpophilus were guide for interested growers, and as detected in samples from traps in Carpophilus starts to become active and able we continue our research we aim to almond orchards, and concerns that to fly to traps as temperatures increase in provide growers with more detailed beetle populations could escalate late winter/early spring.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution and Genomic Basis of Beetle Diversity
    The evolution and genomic basis of beetle diversity Duane D. McKennaa,b,1,2, Seunggwan Shina,b,2, Dirk Ahrensc, Michael Balked, Cristian Beza-Bezaa,b, Dave J. Clarkea,b, Alexander Donathe, Hermes E. Escalonae,f,g, Frank Friedrichh, Harald Letschi, Shanlin Liuj, David Maddisonk, Christoph Mayere, Bernhard Misofe, Peyton J. Murina, Oliver Niehuisg, Ralph S. Petersc, Lars Podsiadlowskie, l m l,n o f l Hans Pohl , Erin D. Scully , Evgeny V. Yan , Xin Zhou , Adam Slipinski , and Rolf G. Beutel aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; bCenter for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; cCenter for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Arthropoda Department, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; dBavarian State Collection of Zoology, Bavarian Natural History Collections, 81247 Munich, Germany; eCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; fAustralian National Insect Collection, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; gDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute for Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; hInstitute of Zoology, University of Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; iDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Wien, Wien 1030, Austria; jChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, 518083 Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; kDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State
    [Show full text]
  • Family Nitidulidae
    1 Family Nitidulidae Key to genus adapted and updated from Joy (1932) A Practical Handbook of British Beetles. Checklist From the Checklist of Beetles of the British Isles, 2012 edition (R.G. Booth), edited by A. G. Duff (available from www.coleopterist.org.uk/checklist.htm). Subfamily Carpophilinae Subfamily Cryptarchinae Urophorus Murray, 1864 Cryptarcha Stuckard, 1839 Carpophilus Stephens, 1829 Glischrochilus Reitter 1873 Epuraea Erichson, 1843 Pityophagus Stuckard, 1839 Subfamily Meligethinae Pria Stephens, 1829 Subfamily Cybocephalinae Meligethes Stephens, 1829 Cybocephalus Erichson, 1844 Subfamily Nitidulinae Nitidula Fabricius 1775 Omosita Erichson, 1843 Soronia Erichson, 1843 Amphotis Erichson, 1843 Cychrmaus Kugelann, 1794 Pocadius Erichson, 1843 Thalycra Erichson, 1843 Image Credits The illustrations in this key are reproduced from the Iconographia Coleopterorum Poloniae, with permission kindly granted by Lech Borowiec. Creative Commons. © Mike Hackston (2009) Adapted and updated from Joy (1932). 2 Family Nitidulidae Key to genus 1 Elytra truncate leaving more than just the pygidium exposed. .......................................2 Only the pygidium is exposed beyond the elytra. ......................................3 Creative Commons. © Mike Hackston (2009) Adapted and updated from Joy (1932). 3 2 Antennae with the club much more distinct; pronotum with the hind margin simply and gently curved and the sides less rounded; hind angles of pronotum more distinct. ....................................... .......... Genera Carpophilus and Urophorus Club of the antennae not abruptly widening compared to the rest of the antennae. ................ .......... Family Kateretidae Creative Commons. © Mike Hackston (2009) Adapted and updated from Joy (1932). 4 3 Elytra more distinctly rounded (in cross section) and more elongate (best viewed from the side). ...............................................................................4 Elytra more flattened and less elongate. ...................................................9 Creative Commons.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Park Trees As Habitat for Saproxylic Beetle Species
    Biodivers Conserv (2012) 21:619–642 DOI 10.1007/s10531-011-0203-0 ORIGINAL PAPER Old park trees as habitat for saproxylic beetle species Mats Jonsell Received: 25 March 2011 / Accepted: 30 November 2011 / Published online: 14 December 2011 Ó The Author(s) 2011. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Very old trees harbour a diverse fauna of saproxylic insects, many of which are classified as threatened due to the scarcity of this kind of habitat. Parks, which often contain many old trees, are therefore considered to be important sites for this fauna. However parks are intensively managed and dead wood is often removed. Therefore this study compares if the saproxylic beetle fauna in parks is as diverse as it is in more natural stands. Eight ‘Park’ sites at manor houses around lake Ma¨laren, Sweden were compared with trees in wooded meadows: eight grazed sites, here termed ‘Open’, and 11 sites regrown with younger trees, termed ‘Re-grown’. The comparison was made on lime trees (Tilia spp.): one of the most frequent tree species in old parks which host a diverse beetle fauna. Beetles were sampled with window traps, which in total caught 14,460 saproxylic beetles belonging to 323 species, of which 50 were red-listed. When comparing all saproxylic species, ‘Park’ sites had significantly fewer species than ‘Open’ sites. However, for beetles in hollow trees and for red-listed species there was no significant difference, the number in ‘Park’ being intermediate between ‘Open’ and ‘Re-grown’. Species composition differed between sites, but only marginally so.
    [Show full text]
  • Semiochemical-Based Alternatives to Synthetic Toxicant Insecticides For
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Rothamsted Repository Arthropod-Plant Interactions DOI 10.1007/s11829-017-9569-6 ORIGINAL PAPER Semiochemical‑based alternatives to synthetic toxicant insecticides for pollen beetle management Alice L. Mauchline1 · Maxime R. Hervé2 · Samantha M. Cook3 Received: 31 March 2017 / Accepted: 3 October 2017 © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of United Kingdom 2017 Abstract There is an urgent need to develop sustainable Introduction pest management systems to protect arable crops in order to replace the current over-reliance on synthetic insecticides. The pollen beetle Brassicogethes aeneus Fab. (synonym Semiochemicals are insect- or plant-derived chemicals that Meligethes aeneus) (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) is a major are used by organisms as information signals. Integrated pest pest of oilseed rape (OSR) (Brassica napus L.) crops (Wil- management tools are currently in development that utilise liams 2010). Of the suite of pests that attack OSR, pollen semiochemicals to manipulate the behaviour of pest insects beetles were found to have the largest negative impact on and their natural enemies to provide efective control of pests seed yield (Gagic et al. 2016). They can cause signifcant within the crop. These innovative tools usually require fewer feeding damage to the developing fower buds which can inputs and can involve multiple elements, therefore reduc- result in blind stalks, thereby preventing the growth of pods, ing the likelihood of resistance developing compared with leading to large economic losses (Hansen 2004; Zlof 2008). use of synthetic toxicants. We review here the life cycle of Pyrethroid insecticides have been the main control option for the pollen beetle Brassicogethes aeneus (previously known pollen beetles for over 20 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) on Annona Spp
    Scientific Notes 475 EFFECT OF PHEROMONE BAIT STATIONS FOR SAP BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: NITIDULIDAE) ON ANNONA SPP. FRUIT SET J. E. PEÑA1, A. CASTIÑEIRAS1, R. BARTELT2 AND R. DUNCAN1 1University of Florida, Tropical Research and Education Center, 18905 SW 280 St., Homestead FL 33031 2USDA-ARS-Midwest Area National Center for Agriculture, 1815 N University St., Peoria IL 61604 Atemoya, Annona squamosa L. x Annona cherimola Miller, and sugar apple, A. squamosa, have importance for the tropical fruit industry in Florida, but their yields are unreliable. This is so because fruit set is erratic due to highly variable pollination and physiological stress. Flowers of atemoyas and sugar apples initially undergo a fe- male phase during which stigmas are receptive, and later they have a male phase when the anthers split to shed pollen, but the stigmas are no longer receptive (Gotts- berger 1970). This prevents autogamy (i.e., fertilization of ovules by pollen from the same flower) (Nadel and Peña 1994). Most Annonaceae species are cantharophilous (beetle-pollinated), and a few are sapromyophilus (fly-pollinated) or thrips-pollinated (Gottsberger 1985). Cross pollination of Annona spp. can be carried out by sap beetles (Nitidulidae) (Reiss 1971, Nagel et al. 1989, George et al. 1992). In south Florida, nit- idulid pollinators are in the genera Carpophilus (six species) and Haptoncus (one spe- cies) (Nadel and Peña 1994). Gottsberger (1985) suggested that the Annonaceae and other primitive plants with cantharophilous pollination had evolved a specialized pol- lination system by releasing heavy floral volatiles that attract certain beetle species. For example, atemoya flowers open mid- to late afternoon and allow beetles enter.
    [Show full text]