Secondary Transfer 2016 – How Offers Were Made
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Secondary Transfer 2016 – How offers were made The schools in this table received more applications than places available and this means places could not be offered to every applicant. The table gives information about on time offers as at 1 March 2016. These figures will change if places are declined and then offered to other pupils from the waiting list. Distance of Exceptional Number of Number of Children Looked- last child social or Children applications places with SEN after Siblings Distance offered medical of staff * received offered statements children (straight-line, need miles) Alexandra Park 1678 232 8 2 0 73 n/a 149 0.7324 Fortismere 1375 270 8 2 2 85 2 171 1.185 Gladesmore 882 243 9 1 0 57 n/a 176 0.9974 Heartlands High 932 216 12 4 1 50 n/a 149 1.2509 Highgate Wood 966 243 2 0 0 53 n/a 188 1.2169 Woodside High 771 240 7 1 1 39 n/a 192 1.2176 * This criterion only applies to Fortismere Secondary School. Places could be offered to every applicant who applied on-time to: Greig City Academy, Harris Academy Tottenham, Hornsey School for Girls, Northumberland Park and Park View Alexandra Park School 218 10 4 0 0 232 Fortismere Secondary School 229 36 4 1 0 270 Gladesmore Community School 219 11 8 3 0 2 243 Greig City Academy 65 27 12 6 9 40 159 Harris Academy Tottenham 81 34 13 9 3 4 27 171 Heartlands High School 158 32 18 5 2 1 216 Highgate Wood Secondary School 193 29 14 5 2 243 Hornsey School for Girls 110 12 13 3 3 1 1 143 Northumberland Park Community School 109 22 5 3 8 1 41 189 Park View 126 28 11 5 5 5 36 216 St Thomas More Catholic School 162 18 8 3 1 192 Woodside High School 180 30 13 10 6 1 240 Grand Total 1850 289 123 53 39 15 145 2514 *Allocations - occurs when applicants could not be offered any of their preferences and a place is allocated at the nearest school with an available place. Please note that this information includes late applications. Late figures have been included with on-time. Secondary Transfer 2016 Number and percentage of offers by preference for Haringey residents 1st preference 2nd preference 3rd preference 4th preference 5th preference 6th preference Allocations No. % of No. % of No. % of No. % of No. % of No. % of No. % of Families Families Families Families Families Families Families Families Families Families Families Families Families Families Offered Offered Offered Offered Offered Offered Offered Offered Offered Offered Offered Offered Allocated Allocated Haringey 1931 77.02% 261 10.41% 130 5.19% 45 1.79% 26 1.04% 18 0.72% 96 3.83% .