DOCSLIB.ORG

Orange Is the New Black(Acre): Navigating the Complexities of the Transfer of a Decedent’S Real Proprty Interests

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ORANGE IS THE NEW BLACK(ACRE): NAVIGATING THE COMPLEXITIES OF THE TRANSFER OF A DECEDENT’S REAL PROPRTY INTERESTS CLE Credit: 1.0 Thursday, June 13, 2019 8:30 – 9:30 a.m. French Galt House Hotel Louisville, Kentucky A NOTE CONCERNING THE PROGRAM MATERIALS The materials included in this Kentucky Bar Association Continuing Legal Education handbook are intended to provide current and accurate information about the subject matter covered. No representation or warranty is made concerning the application of the legal or other principles discussed by the instructors to any specific fact situation, nor is any prediction made concerning how any particular judge or jury will interpret or apply such principles. The proper interpretation or application of the principles discussed is a matter for the considered judgement pf the induvial legal practitioner. The faculty and staff of this Kentucky Bar Association CLE program disclaim liability therefore. Attorneys using these materials, or information otherwise conveyed during the program in dealing with a specific legal matter have a duty to research the original and current sources of authority. Printed by: Evolution Creative Solutions 7107 Shona Drive Cincinnati, Ohio 45237 Kentucky Bar Association TABLE OF CONTENTS The Presenter .................................................................................................................. i Orange is the New Black(acre):Navigating the Complexities of the Transfer of a Decedent’s Real Property Interests ............................................................ 1 Appendix A .................................................................................................................... 17 Appendix B .................................................................................................................... 19 Appendix C ................................................................................................................... 21 Appendix D ................................................................................................................... 23 THE PRESENTER Kelli E. Brown Goldberg Simpson, LLC 9301 Dayflower Prospect, Kentucky 40059 (270) 791-7743 [email protected] KELLI BROWN is a partner with the firm of Goldberg Simpson where she chairs the Trust and Estates Department and practices in the areas of estate planning, probate, trust administration, and estate litigation. Ms. Brown received a B.A. from the University of Dayton, a J.D. from Northern Kentucky Salmon P. Chase College of Law, and an LL.M. in Estate Tax from the University of Miami. She is licensed in Ohio, Tennessee, and Kentucky as well as Federal Tax Court. She serves on the KBA Probate and Trust Legislative Committee and is a three time former Chair of the KBA Probate & Trust Law Section. Ms. Brown is a fellow with the American College of Trusts and Estates Counsel (ACTEC). She is the ACTEC State Chair-Elect beginning in 2019. She is a frequent speaker on all topics associated with estate planning and has many publications on all topics realted to estate planning and estate administration. Ms. Brown is a Justice Thomas B. Spain Award Winner. In 2017 Ms. Brown published Estate Planning When You Have An Addicted Child. i ii ORANGE IS THE NEW BLACK(ACRE): NAVIGATING THE COMPLEXITIES OF THE TRANSFER OF A DECEDENT’S REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS Kelli E. Brown, J.D., LL.M. I. INTRODUCTION When a Kentucky decedent dies owning real property, ownership of that real property generally passes by one of these methods: (1) by operation of law; (2) by the terms of a last will and testament or by trust; or (3) by the laws of intestate succession. The fact that there is not one defined way can be a very difficult concept for anyone, including attorneys. What is often most confusing is that although title passes because of the death of the decedent, real property is not necessarily subject to “probate” and probate administration. When and whether real property interests are subject to probate presents real challenges for the Kentucky lawyer who may struggle in a particular situation with some of the following issues: A. When can/should/how a fiduciary sell real property in a probate estate? B. What are the rights of creditors in probate estates where real property was the primary asset of the decedent? C. What are the rights of the beneficiaries to object to a sale by a fiduciary? D. How are the real property bills (taxes, mortgage, gas, electric, water) paid during the probate estate? E. What steps is a fiduciary obligated to take to protect title to the real estate? F. What are the obligations for real property subject to a mortgage? G. How should property pass if an heir/beneficiary has creditor/debt issues? H. Can real property passing by operation of law (i.e. survivorship) stand “good” for the debts of the decedent? This article primarily focuses on real property that does not pass by operation of law (example, real property passing by virtue of joint tenants with rights of survivorship where there is a survivor), although it will touch on those issues. Instead, it will walk you through the basics of real property issues that a Kentucky attorney may encounter when a decedent’s interest in Kentucky real property passes by the laws of intestacy, by last will and testament, and/or by trust, and will attempt to answer the above questions. 1 II. PROBATE AND KENTUCKY REAL PROPERTY: IN GENERAL A. General Rule of Real Property Interests in Kentucky When a person dies owning real property in Kentucky, his or her interests pass in accordance with Kentucky law. As stated above, at the death of a real property owner, such real property can pass by one of these methods: by operation of law; by the terms of a last will and testament or trust; or by the laws of intestate succession, if there is not a valid will. When real property passes by intestate succession or by a last will, then the successor to the decedent's interest in the real property is not the decedent's estate, but rather the decedent's heirs or beneficiaries under a Last Will and Testament.1 Stated differently, real property vests in the heirs or beneficiaries at the moment of death. This is a challenging concept to grasp for both attorneys and their clients. Even more difficult is that although real property vests immediately, Kentucky case law and statutes give a fiduciary certain rights for the transfer and sale of real property under some situations such as the payment of debt or a mandated distribution. The general rule is that real estate passes outside of probate, except when it does not. The author of this article wants to establish first and foremost that virtually every issue concerning the passing of Kentucky real property upon death will come back to this general rule. And, while we agree that this is rule is (1) confusing and (2) difficult to explain in terms of title and counseling those impacted by real estate passing as a result of the death of a person owning property in Kentucky, it is what it is, so to speak. B. The Petition for Probate: Real Estate Inclusion Issue If the general rule is that real estate vests at the moment of death unless it does not,2 then at the inception of the probate the issue becomes whether there is an obligation by legal counsel to include real property interests of a decedent on the petition for probate. The recommendation of the author is that the real property interests in which the decedent had an interest should be listed on the petition, even if the inclusion is for informational purposes and denoted as such. The rationale behind this is that our law allows for the use of real property interests to be pulled into an estate under some circumstances. For example, KRS 395.515 states in relevant part:3 ...that if it shall appear that the personal estate is insufficient for the payment of all debts, the court may order the real 1 Slone v. Casey, 194 S.W.3d 336 (Ky. App. 2006); Wood v. Wingfield, 816 S.W.2d 899 (Ky. 1991). 2 Id. 3 KRS 395.515. 2 property descended or devised to the heirs or devisees who may be parties to the action, or so much thereof as shall be necessary, to be sold for the payment of the residue of such debts. Petitions to open a probate are public documents and undoubtedly creditors have certain rights. The disclosure of the real property interests of a decedent can only mean that the probate attorney has provided any person or entity who is examining the decedent’s assets with information to determine that person or entity’s rights in proceeding forward. Basically, it means full disclosure. Further, including real property interests of a decedent within the petition can potentially assist with title issues. Specifically, when the six-month creditor period4 has passed, then the title can reflect that unsecured creditors are known. Essentially, the disclosure of a decedent’s real property interests can strengthen the argument of a fiduciary that full disclosure was made to all potential creditors and can establish that unsecured creditors are known and made aware of the real situation. C. Dispensing with Administration and Real Estate Since real estate vests at the moment of death,5 in theory, if a decedent dies with real property but without other assets subject to probate (or probate assets less than $15,000), then there may be a determination to dispense with administration under KRS 395.455. Yet, if a dispense with administration occurs, it does not necessarily mean that the decedent’s creditors do not have rights. To the contrary, KRS 396.205 provides that a creditor has two years from a decedent’s death to come forward if a full administration is not opened.6 This opens up a very real concern about dispensing with the administration of an estate when the decedent owned real property. The practical implication of the law is that while title may vest without a probate administration, the rights of an unsecured creditor to the decedent’s assets are: (1) the six months of a full administration; or (2) two years if there was not a full administration.7 4 KRS 395.195.
Recommended publications
  • The Law of Property

    The Law of Property

    THE LAW OF PROPERTY SUPPLEMENTAL READINGS Class 14 Professor Robert T. Farley, JD/LLM PROPERTY KEYED TO DUKEMINIER/KRIER/ALEXANDER/SCHILL SIXTH EDITION Calvin Massey Professor of Law, University of California, Hastings College of the Law The Emanuel Lo,w Outlines Series /\SPEN PUBLISHERS 76 Ninth Avenue, New York, NY 10011 http://lawschool.aspenpublishers.com 29 CHAPTER 2 FREEHOLD ESTATES ChapterScope -------------------­ This chapter examines the freehold estates - the various ways in which people can own land. Here are the most important points in this chapter. ■ The various freehold estates are contemporary adaptations of medieval ideas about land owner­ ship. Past notions, even when no longer relevant, persist but ought not do so. ■ Estates are rights to present possession of land. An estate in land is a legal construct, something apart fromthe land itself. Estates are abstract, figments of our legal imagination; land is real and tangible. An estate can, and does, travel from person to person, or change its nature or duration, while the landjust sits there, spinning calmly through space. ■ The fee simple absolute is the most important estate. The feesimple absolute is what we normally think of when we think of ownership. A fee simple absolute is capable of enduringforever though, obviously, no single owner of it will last so long. ■ Other estates endure for a lesser time than forever; they are either capable of expiring sooner or will definitely do so. ■ The life estate is a right to possession forthe life of some living person, usually (but not always) the owner of the life estate. It is sure to expire because none of us lives forever.
  • Anatomy of a Will

    Anatomy of a Will

    PRESENTED AT 18th Annual Estate Planning, Guardianship and Elder Law Conference August 11‐12, 2016 Galveston, Texas ANATOMY OF A WILL Bernard E. ("Barney") Jones Author Contact Information: Bernard E. ("Barney") Jones Attorney at Law 3555 Timmons Lane, Suite 1020 Houston, Texas 77027 713‐621‐3330 Fax 713‐621‐6009 [email protected] The University of Texas School of Law Continuing Legal Education ▪ 512.475.6700 ▪ utcle.org Bernard E. (“Barney”) Jones Attorney at Law 3555 Timmons Lane, Suite 1020 • Houston, Texas 77027 • 713.621.3330 • fax 832.201.9219 • [email protected] Professional ! Board Certified, Estate Planning and Probate Law, Texas Board of Legal Specialization (since 1991) ! Fellow, American College of Trust and Estate Council (elected 1995) ! Adjunct Professor of Law (former), University of Houston Law Center, Houston, Texas, 1995 - 2001 (course: Estate Planning) ! Texas Bar Section on Real Estate, Probate and Trust Law " Council Member, 1998 - 2002; Grantor Trust Committee Chair, 1999 - 2002; Community Property Committee Chair, 1999 - 2002; Subcommittee on Revocable Trusts chair, 1993 - 94 " Subcommittee on Transmutation, member, 1995 - 99, and principal author of statute and constitutional amendment enabling "conversions to community" Education University of Texas, Austin, Texas; J.D., with honors, May 1983; B.A., with honors, May 1980 Selected Speeches, Publications, etc. ! Drafting Down (KISS Revisited) - The Utility and Fallacy of Simplified Estate Planning, 20th Annual State Bar of Texas Advanced Drafting: Estate Planning
  • Administering Oregon Estates: 2012 Edition

    Administering Oregon Estates: 2012 Edition

    Administering Oregon Estates: 2012 Edition Cosponsored by the Estate Planning and Administration Section Friday, November 16, 2012 9 a.m.–4:30 p.m. Oregon Convention Center Portland, Oregon 6 General CLE credits and .5 Ethics credit ADMINISTERING OREGON ESTATES: 2012 EDITION SECTION PLANNERS Holly N. Mitchell, Duffy Kekel LLP, Portland Jack V. Rounsefell, Attorney at Law, Gresham Katharine L. West, Wyse Kadish LLP, Portland Eric J. Wieland, Samuels Yoelin Kantor LLP, Portland OREGON STATE BAR ESTATE PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION SECTION EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE D. Charles Mauritz, Chair Marsha Murray-Lusby, Chair-Elect Eric H. Vetterlein, Past Chair Jeffrey M. Cheyne, Treasurer Matthew Whitman, Secretary Amy E. Bilyeu Eric R. Foster Janice E. Hatton Amelia E. Heath Melanie E. Marmion Holly N. Mitchell Jeffrey G. Moore Timothy O’Rourke Ian T. Richardson Erik S. Schimmelbusch Kenneth Sherman Margaret Vining The materials and forms in this manual are published by the Oregon State Bar exclusively for the use of attorneys. Neither the Oregon State Bar nor the contributors make either express or implied warranties in regard to the use of the materials and/or forms. Each attorney must depend on his or her own knowledge of the law and expertise in the use or modification of these materials. Copyright © 2012 OREGON STATE BAR 16037 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road P.O. Box 231935 Tigard, OR 97281-1935 Administering Oregon Estates: 2012 Edition ii Table OF CONTENTS Schedule . v Faculty . vii 1A. Alternatives to Probate . 1A–i — David C. Streicher, Black Helterline LLP, Portland, Oregon 1B. Probate Jurisdiction and Procedures . 1B–i — Nikki C.
  • Introduction to Law and Legal Reasoning Law Is

    Introduction to Law and Legal Reasoning Law Is

    CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION TO LAW AND LEGAL REASONING LAW IS "MAN MADE" IT CHANGES OVER TIME TO ACCOMMODATE SOCIETY'S NEEDS LAW IS MADE BY LEGISLATURE LAW IS INTERPRETED BY COURTS TO DETERMINE 1)WHETHER IT IS "CONSTITUTIONAL" 2)WHO IS RIGHT OR WRONG THERE IS A PROCESS WHICH MUST BE FOLLOWED (CALLED "PROCEDURAL LAW") I. Thomas Jefferson: "The study of the law qualifies a man to be useful to himself, to his neighbors, and to the public." II. Ask Several Students to give their definition of "Law." A. Even after years and thousands of dollars, "LAW" still is not easy to define B. What does law Consist of ? Law consists of enforceable rule governing relationships among individuals and between individuals and their society. 1. Students Need to Understand. a. The law is a set of general ideas b. When these general ideas are applied, a judge cannot fit a case to suit a rule; he must fit (or find) a rule to suit the unique case at hand. c. The judge must also supply legitimate reasons for his decisions. C. So, How was the Law Created. The law considered in this text are "man made" law. This law can (and will) change over time in response to the changes and needs of society. D. Example. Grandma, who is 87 years old, walks into a pawn shop. She wants to sell her ring that has been in the family for 200 years. Grandma asks the dealer, "how much will you give me for this ring." The dealer, in good faith, tells Grandma he doesn't know what kind of metal is in the ring, but he will give her $150.
  • Status of the Opera10r's Lien in Law and in Equity

    Status of the Opera10r's Lien in Law and in Equity

    1987) THE OPERATOR'S LIEN 87 STATUSOF THE OPERA10R'S LIEN IN LAWAND IN EQUITY KAREN L. PETIIFER • This paper examines the Operator's lien. as it is written in the 1981 Canadian Association of Petroleum Landmen Operating Procedure. and the law of Canada. the Commonwealth and the United States to determine the nature ofthe Operator's interest and the steps which the Operator must take to perfect its security and succeed in priority contests with other creditors. I. THE OPERATING AGREEMENT The Canadian Association of Petroleum Landmen ("CAPC') has developed four standard-form Operating Agreements since 1969to govern the legal relationship between Joint-Operators who have participating interests in the petroleum substances leased from either private owners or the Crown. The Agreement is designed to supplement a basic contract among the parties which may address matters such as drilling obligations. 1 It is the Operating Agreement which eventually governs day-to-day operations, including activities such as the drilling, completing, equipping and operating of joint interest wells. The most recent standard-form CAPL Agreement was drafted in 1981 and is used frequently by the industry. Article XV of the Agreement defines the relationship of the parties as tenants in common and not as creating a partnership, joint venture or association. 2 The Joint-Operators collectively agree to appoint one party as the Operator to carry out operations "for the joint account", which means " ... for the benefit, interest, ownership, risk, cost, expense and obligation of the parties hereto in proportion to each party's participating interest" .3 The Operator is granted the control and management of the operation of the joint lands.
  • Multiple-State Estates Under the Uniform Probate Code, 27 Wash

    Multiple-State Estates Under the Uniform Probate Code, 27 Wash

    Washington and Lee Law Review Volume 27 | Issue 1 Article 5 Spring 3-1-1970 Multiple-State Estates Under The niU form Probate Code Allan D. Vestal Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr Part of the Estates and Trusts Commons Recommended Citation Allan D. Vestal, Multiple-State Estates Under The Uniform Probate Code, 27 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 70 (1970), https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol27/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington and Lee Law Review at Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington and Lee Law Review by an authorized editor of Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 70 WASHINGTON AND LEE LAW REVIEW [Vol. XXVII MULTIPLE-STATE ESTATES UNDER THE UNIFORM PROBATE CODE ALLAN D. VESTAL* I. THE UNIFORM PROBATE CODE On August 7, 1969, the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws adopted by a vote of the states the Uniform Pro- bate Code. The following week the House of Delegates of the American Bar Association approved the Code.' In these actions a giant step forward was taken toward uniformity in probate law in the United States. Although no state has had the opportunity to consider and adopt the Uniform Code, there is reason to believe that a number of states will give serious consideration to the Code in the near future. For some time in the post World War II period various segments of the legal profession and the lay public had been dissatisfied with the methods of passing property from one generation to another.2 This had resulted in a number of probate revisions which have taken place or which have been urged.3 In the decade of the sixties impetus for re- *John F.
  • © Laura E. Ayers, Esq. Handout for Easement Law in New York

    © Laura E. Ayers, Esq. Handout for Easement Law in New York

    The Law Office of Laura E. Ayers, Esq. 434 Main Street, P.O. Box 237 Schoharie, NY 12157 (518) 456‐6705 www.lauraayerslaw.com Handout for Easement Law in New York Presented for the New York State Bar Association May 14, 2014 Long Island May 21, 2014 New York City May 28, 2014 Albany I. Introduction: a. Definition: An Easement is an interest in real property. Henry v. Malen, 263 A.D.2d 698 (3rd Dept. 1999) i. “…an easement presupposes two distinct tenements, one dominant, the other servient.” Loch Sheldrake Associates Inc. v. Evans, 306 N.Y. 297 (1954) ii. “An easement is an interest in land created by grant or agreement, express or implied, which confers a right upon the owner thereof to some profit, benefit or dominion, or lawful use out of or over the estate of another.” Huyck v. Andrews, 113 N.Y. 81 (1889). iii. There has to be a burdened parcel of real property and a benefited parcel of real property. b. As compared to other rights and interests in Real Property i. Licenses: not an interest in real property, personal to the holder, not assignable and are of limited duration. Henry, Supra. 1. “A license is a privilege, not a right, sometimes called an easement in gross.” Loch Sheldrake Asso. Inc., Supra 2. A “Franchise” is a type of license. New York Telephone Co., v. State, 67 A.D.2d 745 (1979); American Rapid Telegraph Co., v. Hess, 125 N.Y. 641 (1891). 3. “Licenses to do a particular act do not in any degree trench upon the policy of the law which requires that bargains respecting the title or interest in real estate, shall be by deed or in writing.
  • Chapter IV Property Transfers After Death A. Overview and Purpose Land Is a Valuable Asset. When Land Ownership Includes Fores

    Chapter IV Property Transfers After Death A. Overview and Purpose Land Is a Valuable Asset. When Land Ownership Includes Fores

    Chap. IV Property Transfers After Death–Jacobson & Becker 25 Chapter IV Property Transfers After Death A. Overview and Purpose Land is a valuable asset. When land ownership includes forest areas and wood lots, the value attributed to such assets can be misunderstood or overlooked. When the owner of such assets dies, however, the assets transfer to the deceased owner's estate where they await distribution to a new owner or set of owners. The significance associated with the death of a property owner is illustrated by this basic point all items of property have an owner at any point in time. When an owner dies, transfer of the owner's property to someone else is a central issue resulting from the owner's death. In this chapter, we will explore four ways in which property is transferred after an owner's death, i.e., by operation of law, by the intestate law, by a last will and testament, and by a trust created during the owner's lifetime that provides for this transfer after the owner's death. As will be shown here, a person's death sets in motion specific legal rules that make our basic point, that all items of property have an owner at any point in time, a workable legal proposition. The chapter starts with a discussion of joint ownership of property in the form of joint tenancy with the right of survivorship, tenancy by the entirety, and tenancy in common. In some states, these various types of ownership are known by other names such as joint accounts or multiple- party accounts.
  • Heir Property

    Heir Property

    Heir ProPerty IN GEORGIA Second edition, April 2010 Heir ProPerty IN GEORGIA Second Edition, April 2010 Contents Heir Property Ownership 4 Laws of Descent and Distribution 7 Year’s Support 10 Disadvantages of Heir Property 12 Partition Sales 14 Tax Sales 17 Frequently Asked Questions 20 Steps to Protect Your Land 22 Options for Ownership with Clear Title 23 Glossary 27 Acknowledgments 31 The information in this manual is provided as a matter of public service and is for informational use only. The information does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Users of this manual are strongly urged to confer with legal counsel in matters involving heir property. Heir ProPerty ownersHiP History teaches us that land valid will, the person is said to have ownership represents an important died “intestate,” and the property source of wealth and stability owned by the deceased at death is for Georgians. Georgia played known as intestate property. All of a historical and significant role the intestate property is collectively within the agricultural industry, known as the deceased’s “estate.” both before and after the Civil Until a personal representative War. As a result, large acres of land is appointed to administer the were historically held among a deceased’s estate, title to heir relatively small group of owners, property automatically passes to including farmers. With the the qualified heirs who then own passing of each generation, these the estate as tenants in common, large tracts of land succeeded to meaning that each heir owns a new generations, either by will, or fractional interest in all of the by descent, through operation of property.
  • Statutory Estates in Place of an Estate Tail

    Statutory Estates in Place of an Estate Tail

    YALE LAW JOURNAL VOL. XIII APRIL, 1904 No. 6 STATUTORY ESTATES IN PLACE OF AN ESTATE TAIL. Mr. Zane in a recent article" on Determinable Fees gave some space to the problem of the character and validity of limitations arising by statute upon the creation of an estate tail. Believing that he by no means exhausted the possibilities of this branch of his larger subject, I have ventured upon it in the hope of adding somthing while his article is still fresh in the minds of readers. I. STATUTES. There are to-day in Arkansas, Colorado, Missouri and Vermont statutes concerning estates tail, in every respect material to the present inquiry, identical with section 6 of the Illinois Act on Conveyances.2 This last is as follows: "In cases where, by the 8 common law, any person or persons might hereafter become seized, in fee tail, of any lands, tenements or hereditaments, by virtue of any devise, gift, grant or other conveyance, hereafter to be made, or by any other means whatsoever, such person or persons, instead of being or becoming seized thereof in fee tail, shall be deemed and adjudged to be, and become seized thereof, for his or her natural life only, and the remainder shall pass in fee simple absolute, to the person or persons whom the estate tail would, on the death of the first grantee, devise, donee in tail, first pass, according to the course of the common law, by virtue of such devise, gift, grant or conveyance." YALE LAW JOURNAL. Of these the Missouri Act of 1825' seems to have been the first.
  • Title 21 – Real Property

    Title 21 – Real Property

    21 GCA REAL PROPERTY CH. 3 ESTATES IN GENERAL CHAPTER 3 ESTATES IN GENERAL § 3101. Enumeration of Estates. § 3102. Estate in Fee Simple. § 3103. Conditional Fees, Estates Tail Abolished. § 3104. Certain Remainders Valid. § 3105. Freeholds, Chattels Real, Chattel Interests. § 3106. Estates, Life, Third Person, Freehold. § 3107. Future Estates. § 3108. Reversions. § 3109. Remainders. § 3110. Suspended Ownership. § 3111. Suspension by Trust. § 3112. Contingent Remainder in Fee. § 3113. Remainders, Future and Contingent Estates. § 3114. Life Estates, Limitations. § 3115. Remainders, Generally. § 3116. Contingent Remainders, Generally. § 3117. Remainder of Estates for Life. § 3118. Remainder Upon a Contingency. § 3119. Life Tenant Heirs, Purchasers. § 3120. Construction, Certain Remainders. § 3121. Effect, Power of Appointment. § 3101. Enumeration of Estates. Estates in real property, in respect to the duration of their enjoyment, are either: 1. Estates of inheritance or perpetual estates; 2. Estates for life; 3. Estates for years; or 4. Estates at will. SOURCE: CC '761. § 3102. Estate in Fee Simple. Every estate of inheritance is a fee, and every such estate, when not defeasible or conditional, is a fee simple or an absolute fee. 1 COL120106 21 GCA REAL PROPERTY CH. 3 ESTATES IN GENERAL SOURCE: CC '762. § 3103. Conditional Fees, Estates Tail Abolished. Estates tail are abolished, and every estate which would be at common law adjudged to be a fee tail is a fee simple; and if no valid remainder is limited thereon, is a fee simple absolute. SOURCE: CC '763. § 3104. Certain Remainders Valid. Where a remainder in fee is limited upon any estate, which would by the common law be adjudged a fee tail, such remainder is valid as a contingent limitation upon a fee, and vests in possession on the death of the first taker, without issue living at the time of his death.
  • The 2018 Annual Estate Planning & Probate Institute the Nuts and Bolts

    The 2018 Annual Estate Planning & Probate Institute the Nuts and Bolts

    The 2018 Annual Estate Planning & Probate Institute The Nuts and Bolts of Probate March 23, 2018 UNO Thompson Center, Omaha, NE This page intentionally left blank. The NSBA Real Estate, Probate and Trust Law Section presents 2018 Annual Estate Planning & Probate Institute The Nuts and Bolts of Probate Friday, March 23, 2018 • 8:30 am - 4:45 pm UNO Thompson Center • 6705 Dodge St, Omaha, NE 68182 **Also available for viewing via live webcast.** *Nebraska MCLE #153192. Iowa MCLE #286569. 6.5 CLE hours, including 1 hour ethics. (Regular/live) *Nebraska MCLE #153191. Iowa MCLE #286570. 6.5 CLE hours, including 1 hour ethics. (Distance learning) *Only 5 distance learning CLE hours may be claimed per year for Nebraska.* *This program has been approved for 6.0 hours of CPE, including 1 hour of ethics, by the NE Board of Public Accountancy.* 8:30 am Tax Apportionment 1:30 pm Formal Testacy and Appointment Jonathan L. Grob, McGrath North Mullin & Kratz, PC LLO, Proceedings Omaha Robert D. Stowell and Jessica L. Piskorski 9:00 am Life Insurance and Estate Administration 2:00 pm Foreign Representatives and Ancillary Mark Weber and Jeffrey D. Sharp, SilverStone Group, Inc., Administration Omaha Kara E. Brostrom, Baylor Evnen Curtiss Grimit & Witt LLP, Lincoln 9:45 am Nebraska Inheritance Tax Jesse D. Sitz, Baird Holm LLP, Omaha 2:30 pm Break 10:30 am Break 2:45 pm Personal Representatives Appointment, Control, and Termination of Authority; 10:45 am Accountings, Federal and State Income Tax Duties and Powers Issues (Form 1041s) Matthew D. Baack, Skalka & Baack Law Firm, Hastings Daniel I.