Periodic Review Report Presented By: Hamilton College Clinton, New York June 1, 2016 Joan Hinde Stewart, President Most Recent Decennial Review: April 2011

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Periodic Review Report Presented By: Hamilton College Clinton, New York June 1, 2016 Joan Hinde Stewart, President Most Recent Decennial Review: April 2011 Periodic Review Report Presented by: Hamilton College Clinton, New York June 1, 2016 Joan Hinde Stewart, President Most recent decennial review: April 2011 Table of Contents Section 1: Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... 4 Section 2: Institution Responses to the Previous Evaluation ........................................................................ 6 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Mission and Goals..................................................................................................................................... 6 Leadership, Governance, and Administration ........................................................................................... 9 Integrity ..................................................................................................................................................... 9 Admission, Retention, and Support Services .......................................................................................... 10 Faculty and Educational Offerings ......................................................................................................... 11 Section 3: Current Status – Challenges and Opportunities ......................................................................... 14 Leadership Change .................................................................................................................................. 14 Faculty Retirements ................................................................................................................................ 14 Diversity .................................................................................................................................................. 17 Affordability ........................................................................................................................................... 19 Facility Planning ..................................................................................................................................... 21 Athletics .................................................................................................................................................. 21 Health and Counseling Center ................................................................................................................ 21 Center for the Humanities ....................................................................................................................... 22 Other Opportunities ................................................................................................................................ 22 Section 4: Linkages between Institutional Planning and Budgeting ........................................................... 23 Strategic Planning ................................................................................................................................... 23 Annual Planning, Budgeting, and Assessment ....................................................................................... 23 Other Institutional and Financial Planning Linkages .............................................................................. 25 Section 5: Enrollment and Finance Trends and Projections ....................................................................... 26 Five-Year Financial Forecast .................................................................................................................. 26 Required Documents ............................................................................................................................... 31 Section 6: Organized and Sustained Processes to Assess Student Learning............................................... 32 Assessment of Curricula and Student Learning ...................................................................................... 32 Student Learning Assessment Activities Initiated After the 2011 Review .................................... 33 Ongoing Student Learning Assessment Activities ......................................................................... 37 Institutional Assessment ......................................................................................................................... 39 Institutional Assessment Activities Initiated After 2011 Review .................................................. 39 Ongoing Institutional Assessment Activities ................................................................................. 40 Appendix A. HEDS Alumni Survey 2012 Academic Experiences Report. ................................................ 42 Appendix B. Trend analysis of pre- and post-need-blind policy. ............................................................... 48 Appendix C. Learning Resource Centers development plan. ..................................................................... 49 Appendix D. STEM interest and First-Year Course status. ........................................................................ 51 Appendix E. Comparative AAUP Salaries 2014-15 and 2015-16. ............................................................. 52 Appendix F. Results of Faculty workplace survey. .................................................................................... 53 Appendix G. Formation of CAP Subcommittee on the Curriculum. .......................................................... 54 Appendix H. Affirmative Action Report May 2015. .................................................................................. 56 Appendix I. Strategic Plan, January 2009. .................................................................................................. 66 Appendix J. Hamilton College Strategic Plan Update. ............................................................................... 68 Appendix K. Facility Planning, Hamilton College. .................................................................................... 90 Appendix L. Academic Department Annual Report. .................................................................................. 92 Appendix M. CAP Allocation Guidelines. ................................................................................................. 95 Appendix N. Department/Program Periodic Review Process. .................................................................... 96 4 Section 1: Executive Summary Hamilton College is a private, non-denominational liberal arts college in which students take responsibility for their education through an open curriculum. A faculty and a corps of educational professionals dedicated to teaching and mentoring deliver our curriculum and support student learning; Hamilton emphasizes writing, speaking, and quantitative and symbolic reasoning across the curriculum with assistance from renowned learning resource centers. There are 43 concentrations (majors) and 41 minors, allowing students to complement their broad general education with a wide choice of disciplinary programs. With all students living on campus, vibrant co-curricular programming and social activities, and a 9:1 student-to-faculty ratio, Hamilton students are part of a close-knit, supportive, academic community. The visiting team report from Hamilton’s 2011 Middle States accreditation review was affirmative, with no recommendations. However, there were many helpful suggestions for all standards, and particularly Standard 14, assessment of student learning. In response, the Dean of Faculty has instituted systematic new assessment protocols, and has engaged the faculty to think more holistically about our teaching and learning enterprise. The assessment of student learning is based on two premises: first, that the faculty are the drivers of assessment through their regular interactions with students; and second, that curricular planning and development are necessarily intertwined with assessment – one cannot be considered without the other. The Dean of Faculty conceptually illustrated this through a flow chart of “faculty- centered assessment” (FCA), from the course level through long-term college curricular development, linking assessment, change, and resource allocation (see section 6). Among steps to document FCA, the Dean restructured the annual department and program reports to record assessment activities of faculty and resultant curricular changes, linked periodic departmental and program review to our faculty allocation process, and asked our faculty Committee on Academic Policy to institute a long-term curricular planning process that incorporates these assessments. Apart from assessment and other successes over the past five years, the College has faced serious challenges. The Title IX landscape is evolving; several years ago, the College created a full-time Title IX coordinator position, and has conducted either its own survey or the HEDS Sexual Assault Climate Survey annually. While the surveys found too many students have been victims of assault and unwanted behavior, the Title IX Coordinator’s work has borne fruit: the percentage of students at Hamilton who were familiar with sexual assault policies and procedures was very high. Nevertheless, the US Department of Education is currently investigating a complaint about a recent case at Hamilton. Understanding the climate for students of color and other underrepresented groups is another
Recommended publications
  • Asst. Coach Mackenzie Williams
    Head Coach Gillian McDonald Asst. Coach Mackenzie Williams Student-Athlete Profiles The 2013 Gillian McDonald is in her eighth year as Mackenzie Williams is in her second year Caroline Clark the head field hockey coach at Hamilton as an assistant coach at Hamilton. Wil- Schedule College. McDonald has recorded 47 wins liams was a four-year starter at the Uni- Senior, Midfielder at Hamilton, including a team-record 13 in versity of Vermont, playing every position Larchmont, N.Y./Mamaroneck HS Sept. 4 at SUNY Oneonta 6 p.m. 2010. She guided the Continentals to the but goalie. She was a volunteer assistant Major: History Sept. 7 at Trinity * Noon 2011 NESCAC Championship quarterfi- coach for the varsity team at Rice High Sept. 11 UTICA 5 p.m. nals in their first year in the conference. School in South Burlington, Vt., in 2011. 2012: Started all 14 contests and tied Sept. 14 BATES * 11 a.m. Two of McDonald's players made the 2011 Williams scored seven goals and for second on the team in scoring with Sept. 21 at Connecticut College * Noon all-conference team. added six assists for 20 points in 70 five points ... Notched goals against Sept. 24 at Morrisville State 7 p.m. In 2010, Hamilton finished 13-3, includ- games at Division I Vermont. She kicked both Connecticut College and #15 Sept. 28 WESLEYAN * Noon ing 3-0 in overtime games. The Continen- off her college career by making the 2008 Trinity ... Recorded her first career Oct. 5 AMHERST * 11 a.m. tals finished second in the Liberty League America East Conference all-rookie team.
    [Show full text]
  • Below Is a Sampling of the Nearly 500 Colleges, Universities, and Service Academies to Which Our Students Have Been Accepted Over the Past Four Years
    Below is a sampling of the nearly 500 colleges, universities, and service academies to which our students have been accepted over the past four years. Allegheny College Connecticut College King’s College London American University Cornell University Lafayette College American University of Paris Dartmouth College Lehigh University Amherst College Davidson College Loyola Marymount University Arizona State University Denison University Loyola University Maryland Auburn University DePaul University Macalester College Babson College Dickinson College Marist College Bard College Drew University Marquette University Barnard College Drexel University Maryland Institute College of Art Bates College Duke University McDaniel College Baylor University Eckerd College McGill University Bentley University Elon University Miami University, Oxford Binghamton University Emerson College Michigan State University Boston College Emory University Middlebury College Boston University Fairfield University Morehouse College Bowdoin College Florida State University Mount Holyoke College Brandeis University Fordham University Mount St. Mary’s University Brown University Franklin & Marshall College Muhlenberg College Bucknell University Furman University New School, The California Institute of Technology George Mason University New York University California Polytechnic State University George Washington University North Carolina State University Carleton College Georgetown University Northeastern University Carnegie Mellon University Georgia Institute of Technology
    [Show full text]
  • Mobile Device Policy
    POLICY : MOBILE DEVICES EFFECTIVE: 1-JULY-2016 CARETAKER : VICE PRESIDENT FOR LIBRARIES AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to secure and protect St. Lawrence University information assets that may be accessed and stored on mobile devices. Mobile devices offer great flexibility and improved productivity for employees, but they can also create added risk and potential targets for data loss. This document describes St. Lawrence University’s requirements for securing the institution’s information on mobile devices. 2.0 SCOPE All employees, students, contractors and consultants must adhere to this policy. This policy applies to all university owned and personal mobile devices with access to St. Lawrence University’s information assets classified as sensitive or protected. St. Lawrence University considers mobile devices to be smart phones, tablets, or other types of highly mobile devices. Laptops are specifically excluded from the scope due to significant differences in security control options. 3.0 POLICY St. Lawrence University has established the following requirements for use of mobile devices based on ISO/IEC and NIST documented standards*. 3.1 USER AND TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS Individuals and their devices accessing St. Lawrence University’s information assets classified as sensitive or protected are subject to the St. Lawrence University Mobile Device Standard. The user is responsible for the backup of their own personal data and St. Lawrence University is not responsible for the loss of data. New York Six Liberal Arts Consortium 1 of 3 Colgate University, Hamilton College, Hobart & William Smith Colleges St. Lawrence University, Skidmore College, Union College 4.0 ENFORCEMENT The institution may temporarily suspend or block access to any individual or device when it appears necessary to do so in order to protect the integrity, security, or functionality of institution and computer resources.
    [Show full text]
  • HAMILTON COLLEGE Student Handbook 2009-2010
    HAMILTON COLLEGE Student Handbook 2009-2010 Hamilton College reserves the right to change requirements, policies, rules and regulations without prior notice, in accordance with established procedures. Table of Contents Code of Student Conduct Guiding Principles………………………………………………………………………...………….. …8 Prohibited Conduct……………………………………………………………………...……………. …9 Judicial Procedures………………………………………………………………………...…………. …9 Point System……………………………………………………………………………..…………… ..14 Honor Code/Honor Court Constitution…………………………………………………...…………... ..16 Honor Code Statement……………………………………………………………………..…………. ..16 Academic Dishonesty………………………………………………….……………………………... ..16 Honor Court Constitution……………………………………………………………..……………… ..17 Appeals Board………………………………………………………………………………………… ..21 Alcohol and Illegal Drug Policy……………………………………………………...………………. ..23 Summary of New York States Laws Governing Alcohol………………………………………..…… ..23 General Policies………………………………………………………………………..…………….....23 Policy for Student-Sponsored Social Events with Alcohol……………………………..……………. ..24 Educational Programs…………………………………………………………...……………………. ..25 Illegal Drug Policy…………………………………………………………..………………..……… ..25 Harassment and Sexual Misconduct Policy…………………………...……………………………… ..28 Sexual Assault Compliance Statement………………………………………..……………………… ..37 Bias Crimes Compliance Statement………………………………………………..………………… ..40 Hazing………………………………………………………………………...………………………. ..41 Private Society Relationship Statement…………………………………………...………………….. ..42 Residential Life Staff, Facilities, and Regulations………………………..………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • A 10-Year Retrospective on the Posse STEM Program FEBRUARY 2018
    Solving the Equation for Higher Education and the Workforce A 10-year Retrospective on the Posse STEM Program FEBRUARY 2018 1 Solving the Equation for Higher Education and the Workforce A 10-year Retrospective on the Posse STEM Program FEBRUARY 2018 Contents 3 Posse Concept, Mission + Goals 4 Five Program Components 5 Who are Posse Scholars? 6 Praise For Posse STEM Program 7 STEM Program Context + Background 9 Special Thanks 10 Posse STEM Pre-Collegiate + Immersion Programs 11 Posse STEM Campus Program 12 Recruitment: The Dynamic Assessment Process Data 14 Campus Program Data 17 Alumni Data 22 Awards + Fellowships 23 Scholar Profiles 27 Alumni Profiles 31 Appendix 2 Posse Concept, Mission + Goals Concept College + University Partners Posse started in 1989 because of one student who said, AGNES SCOTT COLLEGE BABSON COLLEGE “I never would’ve dropped out of BARD COLLEGE BOSTON UNIVERSITY BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY college if I’d had my posse with me.” BRYN MAWR COLLEGE BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY The Posse Foundation identifies public high school CARLETON COLLEGE students with extraordinary academic and leadership CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY potential who may be overlooked by traditional college CENTRE COLLEGE selection processes. The Foundation extends to these COLBY COLLEGE students the opportunity to pursue personal and academic THE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER excellence by placing them in supportive, multicultural CONNECTICUT COLLEGE teams—Posses—of 10 students. The Foundation’s partner CORNELL UNIVERSITY colleges and universities award Posse Scholars full-tuition DARTMOUTH COLLEGE leadership scholarships. DAVIDSON COLLEGE DENISON UNIVERSITY DEPAUW UNIVERSITY Mission DICKINSON COLLEGE The Posse model works for both students and college FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE campuses and is rooted in the belief that a small, diverse THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY group of talented students—a Posse—carefully selected GRINNELL COLLEGE and trained, can serve as a catalyst for increased HAMILTON COLLEGE individual and community development.
    [Show full text]
  • Colleges & Universities
    Bishop Watterson High School Students Have Been Accepted at These Colleges and Universities Art Institute of Chicago Fordham University Adrian College University of Cincinnati Franciscan University of Steubenville University of Akron Cincinnati Art Institute Franklin and Marshall College University of Alabama The Citadel Franklin University Albion College Claremont McKenna College Furman University Albertus Magnus College Clemson University Gannon University Allegheny College Cleveland Inst. Of Art George Mason University Alma College Cleveland State University George Washington University American Academy of Dramatic Arts Coastal Carolina University Georgetown University American University College of Charleston Georgia Southern University Amherst College University of Colorado at Boulder Georgia Institute of Technology Anderson University (IN) Colorado College University of Georgia Antioch College Colorado State University Gettysburg College Arizona State University Colorado School of Mines Goshen College University of Arizona Columbia College (Chicago) Grinnell College (IA) University of Arkansas Columbia University Hampshire College (MA) Art Academy of Cincinnati Columbus College of Art & Design Hamilton College The Art Institute of California-Hollywood Columbus State Community College Hampton University Ashland University Converse College (SC) Hanover College (IN) Assumption College Cornell University Hamilton College Augustana College Creighton University Harvard University Aurora University University of the Cumberlands Haverford
    [Show full text]
  • Thepresidents' REPORT
    THE POSSE FOUNDATION, INC. thePRESIDENTS’ REPORT 2010, VOL. 5 Obama Donates Portion of Nobel Prize to Posse On March 11, 2010, The Posse and recognition. Foundation became one of only 10 “On behalf of the entire Posse organizations selected by President Foundation, I thank President Obama Barack Obama to receive a portion of the for this incredible acknowledgment president’s $1.4 million Nobel Peace Prize and support,” says Posse President and award money, which he elected to donate Founder Deborah Bial. “For 20 years to charitable causes. Posse has been finding outstanding young people and connecting them to the great THE PRESIDENT’S SUPPORT IS A MESSAGE education they so deserve. “The president’s support is more than TO THE COUNTRY THAT THESE YOUNG financial; it is a message to the country that PEOPLE ARE NEEDED AS LEADERS these young people are not only important, but needed as leaders. We are beyond “These organizations do thrilled.” extraordinary work in the United States The other nine organizations selected and abroad helping students, veterans and to receive donations ranging from COURTESY WHITE HOUSE COURTESY countless others in need,” said President $100,000 to $250,000 are: Fisher House, Obama. “I’m proud to support their work.” the Clinton‑Bush Haiti Fund, College Within days of sharing the exciting Summit, the United Negro College Fund, news that Posse would receive a $125,000 the Hispanic Scholarship Fund, the grant from President Obama, hundreds Appalachian Leadership and Education of Posse Scholars and Alumni sent in Foundation, the American Indian letters expressing their appreciation College Fund, AfriCare and the Central for the president’s remarkable gift Asia Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • IWLCA All-Regional Performers Announced
    IWLCA Names Academic Squads and Merit Squads in Division III Three schools designated as merit squads; 61 other schools also honored The IWLCA has recognized three schools as earning Merit Squad status while 61 other earned Academic Squad honors for the 2010 season. Institutions were named Merit Squads by virtue of having one of the top three team GPAs for the season; every school with a team GPA of 3.0 or higher earned Academic Squad honors. Bates College ranked first with a 3.470 GPA, just edging Washington & Lee University, which posted a 3.458 GPA, and Vassar College, which had a 3.410. Of the 64 institutions, 13 participated in the NCAA Championships, including NCAA runner-up Hamilton College and semifinalists Gettysburg College and Franklin & Marshall College. Merit Squads Bates College Washington & Lee University Vassar College Academic Squads Adrian College Allegheny College Alvernia University Amherst College Bates College Bowdoin College Bridgewater College Bryn Mawr College Buffalo State College Castleton State College The Catholic University of America Centenary College (N.J.) Colby College College of Notre Dame of Maryland Colorado College Connecticut College Denison University Drew University Eastern University Franklin & Marshall College Gettysburg College Hamilton College Haverford College Immaculata University Kenyon College Lynchburg College Manhattanville College Marywood University McDaniel College Messiah College Middlebury College Mount Holyoke College Muhlenberg College Nazareth College SUNY New Paltz Oberlin College Ohio Wesleyan University SUNY Oneonta Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Rochester Inst. of Technology University of Rochester Rowan University Saint Vincent College Salve Regina University Sewanee: The University of the South Skidmore College St. Lawrence University St.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Program Guide
    PROGRAM AND RESOURCE GUIDE Program and Resource Guide and Resource Program The Southwest Center for Human Relations Studies on Race &Annual National Conference 18th American Higher Education (NCORE 2005) Ethnicity in Public and Community Services Division College of Continuing Education The University of Oklahoma 2350 McKown Drive Norman, Oklahoma 73072-6678 The University of Oklahoma is an equal opportunity institution. Accommodations on the basis of disability are available by calling NCORE 2005 (405) 292-4172. 18TH ANNUAL National Conference on Race & Ethnicity in American Higher Education May 31 through June 4, 2005 N New York City Sponsored by The Southwest Center for Human Relations Studies Public and Community Services Division N University Outreach THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The Southwest Center for Human Relations Studies NCORE 2005-2006 The Executive Committee of the Southwest Center for Human Relations Studies serves as the primary planning body for the Annual NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (NAC) National Conference on Race & Ethnicity in American Higher Education (NCORE). The Executive Committee encourages direct, broadly based input into the planning process from all conference participants through the conference evaluation process, discussion, and other written and verbal communication. The NCORE National Advisory Committee is now established. The Chair for the year ahead is Thomas L. Hill, Ph.D., Vice President for Student Affairs, Iowa State University at Ames, Iowa; Executive Committee Member, Southwest Center for Human Relations Studies, The University of Richard Allen, Ph.D. Richard E. Hilbert, Ph.D. (Chair) Beth Wilson, J.D.. Oklahoma-Norman, Oklahoma. Policy Analyst Professor Emeritus Executive Assistant to the The Cherokee Nation Department of Sociology President, and Director, The key figures in the development of the proposal were Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Commencement Program 2021
    One Hundred & Forty Third 143Commencement May 30, 2021 Contents Order of Exercises ........................................................................................................ 1 Speakers ........................................................................................................................... 3 Candidates for Honorary Degrees ............................................................................ 3 Commencement Speaker ........................................................................................... 6 Candidates for Graduate Degrees ............................................................................. 7 Candidates for Baccalaureate Degrees .................................................................... 9 Candidates for Baccalaureate Degrees with Departmental Honors ......................................................................................20 Candidates for Baccalaureate Degrees with Latin Honors .......................................................................................................23 Selected Fellowships and Awards ..........................................................................24 Candidates for Baccalaureate Degrees Elected to the National Honor Societies ..............................................................24 Smith College School for Social Work ..................................................................27 Academic Regalia ........................................................................................................30
    [Show full text]
  • Class of 2018 College Acceptances
    Class OF 2018 COLLEGE acceptances Academy of Art University Case Western Reserve University - 2 Fordham University - 10 University of Alabama - 4 University of Central Florida Franklin & Marshall College - 4 Allegheny College Chapman University - 2 Franklin Pierce University American University - 6 College of Charleston - 2 Franklin University Switzerland American University of Paris City College of New York CUNY George Washington University - 15 University of the Arts Claremont McKenna College Georgetown University - 4 Assumption College Cleveland Institute of Art Georgia Institute of Technology - 2 Bard College - 4 Colby College - 5 University of Georgia Barnard College - 2 Colgate University - 2 Gettysburg College - 3 Barton College University of Colorado at Boulder - 5 Hamilton College - NY - 2 Bates College - 4 Colorado College - 2 Hampton University Bentley University - 2 Colorado School of Mines University of Hartford Binghamton University - 4 Colorado State University Harvard University Boston College - 6 Columbia University Harvey Mudd College Boston University - 17 Connecticut College - 9 Haverford College Bowdoin College University of Connecticut - 10 University of Hawaii at Manoa Brandeis University Cornell University - 5 Hobart and William Smith Colleges - 12 University of British Columbia - 2 University of Delaware - 2 Hofstra University Brown University - 6 Denison University College of the Holy Cross - 4 Bryant University - 2 University of Denver Howard University Bucknell University - 3 DePaul University Hunter College
    [Show full text]
  • Quick Reference: Data Classification and Handling
    QUICK REFERENCE: DATA CLASSIFICATION AND HANDLING Effective: 09-19-2017 1.0 PURPOSE Classification of data is a critical element of any mature information security program and fundamental to securing New York Six Liberal Arts Consortium (NY6) information assets. This Quick Reference has been developed to assist, provide direction to and govern all entities of the organization regarding identification, classification and handling of information assets. 2.0 DEFINITIONS Data: Information in a specific representation, usually as a sequence of symbols that have meaning. Data Asset: Any entity comprised of data. The terms “information asset” and “data asset” are used interchangeably throughout this document. Source: Committee on National Security Systems Instruction No. 4009 (CNSSI-4009) 3.0 QUICK REFERENCE – COMMON DATA ASSETS The following Quick Reference chart illustrates the most common data assets and their classification. This chart is provided for reference purposes only and is not intended to supersede the Data Classification Policy or Procedure. New York Six Liberal Arts Consortium Colgate University, Hamilton College, Hobart & William Smith Colleges St. Lawrence University, Skidmore College, Union College 1 of 6 COMMON DATA ASSETS Confidential Sensitive Public Common • Privileged attorney client • Faculty and staff • Information authorized to Data Assets communications employment applications, be available on or • Social Security Numbers personnel files, benefits through public website • Credit Card Numbers information, salary, birth
    [Show full text]