DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Tables

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Tables Table of Tables Part I: Longitudinal Analysis for the 2005-2006 Cohort, Year 1 and 2: NESCAC vs. All CSP Institutions Table 1.1: Participating CSP Institutions, 2005-06 Cohort, Year 2………………………………………………....7 Figure 1.1: Percentile Class Rank by Gender and Athletic Status………………………………..…………......…..9 Figure 1.2: Two-Year Comparison of Average Percentile Class Rank for Men’s Sports…………………….….....11 Figure 1.3: Two-Year Comparison of Average Percentile Class Rank for Women’s Sports………………….…....13 Figure 1.4: Two-Year Comparison of Percentage of Withdrawals…………………………………………….…...15 Figure 1.5: Differences in Average Percentile Class Rank Between Athletes and Non- Athletes………………………………………………………………………………………..….......17 Figure 1.6: Two-Year Comparison of Average Percentile Class Rank among Male and Female Athletes and Non-Athletes…………………………………………………………………...…..…..19 Background Information for Estimated Underperformance……………………………………………….........21 Figure 1.7: Differences in GPA and Estimated Underperformance for Athletes and Non-Athletes By Gender………………………………………………………………………………………….…23 Part II: Overview of 2006-07 Entering Cohort: NESCAC vs. All CSP Institutions Table 2.1: Participating CSP Institutions, 2006-07 Cohort, Year 1……………………………..………….……...27 Table 2.2: Overview of 2006-07 Cohort, Year 1…….…………………………………………………………….29 Figure 2.1: Comparison of Racial/Ethnic Distribution by Athletic Participation…………………………….……31 Figure 2.2: Comparison of Racial/Ethnic Distribution by Recruited Status……….……………………………....33 Figure 2.3: Comparison of Percentile Class Rank for the First-Year College GPA……………………..………...35 Figure 2.4: Comparison of Percentile Class Rank by Athletic Participation and by Gender……………..……….37 Figure 2.5: Comparison of Percentile Class Rank for Athletes by Recruited Status……………………..………..39 Figure 2.6: Comparison of Percentile Class Rank for Men’s Teams……………………………………..………..41 Figure 2.7: Comparison of Percentile Class Rank for Women’s Teams…………………………………..……….43 Figure 2.8: Comparison of Percentage of Withdrawals by Athletic Status………………….……………..……...45 Figure 2.9: Comparison of Average SATCR + SATM Scores (1600-Point Scale)………………………………...47 Figure 2.10: Comparison of Average HS Percentile Class Rank by Gender & Athletic Status…………………...49 Table of Tables (continued) Part III: Overview of 2006-07 Entering Cohort: Hamilton College vs. NESCAC Table 3.1: Overview of 2006-07 Cohort, Year 1……………………………………………………..…………….53 Figure 3.1: Comparison of Racial/Ethnic Distribution by Athletic Participation…………………………….……55 Figure 3.2: Comparison of Racial/Ethnic Distribution by Recruited Status……….……………………………....57 Figure 3.3: Comparison of Percentile Class Rank for the First-Year College GPA……………………..………...59 Figure 3.4: Comparison of Percentile Class Rank by Athletic Participation and by Gender……………..……….61 Figure 3.5: Comparison of Percentile Class Rank for Athletes by Recruited Status……………………..………..63 Figure 3.6: Comparison of Percentile Class Rank for Men’s Teams……………………………………..………..65 Figure 3.7: Comparison of Percentile Class Rank for Women’s Teams…………………………………..……….67 Figure 3.8: Comparison of Percentage of Withdrawals by Athletic Status………………….……………..……...69 Figure 3.9: Comparison of Average SATCR and SATM Scores (1600-Point Scale)……………………..……….71 Figure 3.10: Comparison of Average HS Percentile Class Rank by Gender and Athletic Status…………...……..73 2 Introduction This report provides an analysis of the data submitted to the College Sports Project between November 2007 and June 2008. It is divided into three parts. The first is an update on the 2005-06 cohort, which was first reported on last year. The update includes information about underperformance among athletes in their second year of enrollment. The second and third parts of the report provide initial information about a new cohort: those who initially enrolled in 2006-07. 3 4 Part I: Longitudinal Analysis for the 2005-2006 Cohort Year One and Year Two 5 Table 1.1 provides a list of all institutions that have submitted two years of data for the 2005-06 cohort. It also includes the number of students in the cohort who were enrolled at each institution for at least part of the second year. Complete data files were received from 77 institutions, with a total of nearly 42,000 students. Institutions that first joined the project this year and also provided the prior year’s data are shown in bold. The data for this report were received between November 2007 and June 2008. Participating institutions submitted data electronically using a secure FTP site protecting both student and institutional confidentiality. Three colleges, Cabrini, Lebanon Valley, and Lewis & Clark, discontinued participation in the project, but may re-join at a later date. Several additional institutions will be joining the next round of data collection, and will be asked to provide data for all previous years. 6 Table 1.1: Participating CSP Institutions, 2005-06 Cohort, Year 2, Continuing Students # of # of # of Institution Name Students Institution Name Students Institution Name Students in Cohort in Cohort in Cohort Albion College 529 Haverford College 318 St. Lawrence University 549 Allegheny College 587 Hiram College 236 St. Olaf College 800 Amherst College 447 Hobart and William Smith Colleges 488 SUNY - New Paltz 1225 Austin College 364 Hope College 835 Susquehanna University 484 Bates College 517 Illinois College 226 Sweet Briar College 399 Beloit College 384 Illinois Wesleyan University 589 The University of Texas at Dallas 2081 Bowdoin College 478 Juniata College 417 Thomas More College 194 Bridgewater College 448 Kenyon College 425 Transylvania University 314 Bryn Mawr College 359 Lawrence University 430 Trinity College 581 California Institute of Technology 239 Lynchburg College 568 Trinity University 668 Carleton College 544 Macalester College 512 Tufts University 1393 Centre College 339 Middlebury College 646 Union College 592 Claremont McKenna College 307 Millsaps College 293 University of Minnesota Morris 385 Clark University 593 Moravian College 417 University of Puget Sound 758 Colby College 559 Mount Holyoke College 582 Ursinus College 414 College of Saint Benedict 559 Muhlenberg College 582 Vassar College 661 Connecticut College 505 Oberlin College 773 Washington & Jefferson College 367 Denison University 611 Occidental College 471 Washington and Lee University 488 Earlham College 346 Pomona College 387 Waynesburg College 326 Emory & Henry College 366 Rhodes College 460 Wellesley College 654 Franklin & Marshall College 606 Rockford College 278 Wesleyan University 762 Goucher College 384 Saint John’s University 438 Westminster College (MO) 265 Guilford College 416 Sewanee: The University of the South 415 Whitman College 391 Hamilton College 519 Skidmore College 732 Williams College 543 Hampden-Sydney College 319 Smith College 751 Wittenberg University 530 Hartwick College 419 Southwestern University 354 7 Figure 1.1 presents the percentile class rank for the cumulative GPA at the end of the first year and at the end of the second year, for athletes and non-athletes by gender. The percentile class rank re-expresses the GPA ranking on a scale from 0 to 100. A student group with a percentile class rank of 55, for example, has a group average GPA that is above the GPAs of 55% of students and below that of 45% of students in that institution’s cohort. In general, differences in the percentile class rank between the first and second year of college are modest. The short line associated with each group represents the percentile class rank in Year 2 for all CSP participating institutions. The horizontal red and blue lines represent the average for all men and for all women at NESCAC. 8 Figure 1.1: Percentile Class Rank by Gender, Athletic Status, and Year NESCAC vs. All CSP Institutions, 2005-06 Cohort 80 70 60 56 56 56 55 53 53 50 50 49 50 50 46 47 46 47 43 43 40 37 38 34 34 30 20 Average Percentile Class Rank (%) 10 (4843) (2217) (2174) (1202) (905) (297) (2669) (1015) (701) (314) 0 (4620) (2330) (2062) (1263) (886) (377) (2558) (1067) (690) (377) Non-Athletes Athletes Male Non- Male Athletes Recruited Non-Recruited Female Non- Female Recruited Non-Recruited Athletes Male Athletes Male Athletes Athletes Athletes Female Female Athletes Athletes ( ) = Number of Students in Category Year 1, NESCAC, 2005-2006 Cohort Year 2, NESCAC, 2005-2006 Cohort All Men, Year 2, at NESCAC All Women, Year 2, at NESCAC Average not reported if 3 or fewer students in category All Institutions, Year 2, 2005-2006 Cohort 9 Figure 1.2 presents the cumulative average percentile class rank for men’s sports and for male non-athletes for years 1 and 2. The Year 2 cumulative percentile class rank for all 77 CSP participating institutions is represented by the short lines associated with each group. Note that a few students leave teams and others join teams in the second year, so that the students represented in the two years are not identical. 10 Figure 1.2: Two-Year Comparison 80 70 60 Men's Sports in NESC 50 50 50 40 30 Average Percentile Class Rank (%) of Average Percentile Class Rank 20 34 36 53 54 AC, 2005-06 Cohort 10 31 32 0 42 44 (2174) Male Non-Athletes (2062) (83) Baseball (85) (55) 28 38 29 40 Men's Basketball (44) (65) 37 Year 1, NESCAC, 2005-2006 Cohort (58) Men's Cross Country 35 All Men, Year 2, at NESCAC (69) (69) 34 Men's Crew 34 (246) 36 (215) Football 34 41 (23) 48 39 Men's Golf (29) 43 (88) Men's Ice Hockey (69) 39 (133) ( ) = Number of Students in Category 44 49 Men's Lacrosse (132) 37 (34) 45 (24) Year 2, NESCAC, 2005-2006Men's Cohort Skiing 44 (82) All Institutions, Year 2, 2005-2006 Cohort 46 (84) Men's Soccer 46 (52) Men's Squash (48) (74) Men's Swimming (66) (59) Men's Tennis (46) 23 (86) 27 32 Men's Track, Indoor (98) (102) Men's Track, Outdoor (104) (3) Men's Water Polo (5) Average not reported if 3 or (16) fewer students in category Men's Wrestling (13) 11 Figure 1.3 presents the cumulative average percentile class rank for women’s sports and for female non-athletes for years 1 and 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Asst. Coach Mackenzie Williams
    Head Coach Gillian McDonald Asst. Coach Mackenzie Williams Student-Athlete Profiles The 2013 Gillian McDonald is in her eighth year as Mackenzie Williams is in her second year Caroline Clark the head field hockey coach at Hamilton as an assistant coach at Hamilton. Wil- Schedule College. McDonald has recorded 47 wins liams was a four-year starter at the Uni- Senior, Midfielder at Hamilton, including a team-record 13 in versity of Vermont, playing every position Larchmont, N.Y./Mamaroneck HS Sept. 4 at SUNY Oneonta 6 p.m. 2010. She guided the Continentals to the but goalie. She was a volunteer assistant Major: History Sept. 7 at Trinity * Noon 2011 NESCAC Championship quarterfi- coach for the varsity team at Rice High Sept. 11 UTICA 5 p.m. nals in their first year in the conference. School in South Burlington, Vt., in 2011. 2012: Started all 14 contests and tied Sept. 14 BATES * 11 a.m. Two of McDonald's players made the 2011 Williams scored seven goals and for second on the team in scoring with Sept. 21 at Connecticut College * Noon all-conference team. added six assists for 20 points in 70 five points ... Notched goals against Sept. 24 at Morrisville State 7 p.m. In 2010, Hamilton finished 13-3, includ- games at Division I Vermont. She kicked both Connecticut College and #15 Sept. 28 WESLEYAN * Noon ing 3-0 in overtime games. The Continen- off her college career by making the 2008 Trinity ... Recorded her first career Oct. 5 AMHERST * 11 a.m. tals finished second in the Liberty League America East Conference all-rookie team.
    [Show full text]
  • Below Is a Sampling of the Nearly 500 Colleges, Universities, and Service Academies to Which Our Students Have Been Accepted Over the Past Four Years
    Below is a sampling of the nearly 500 colleges, universities, and service academies to which our students have been accepted over the past four years. Allegheny College Connecticut College King’s College London American University Cornell University Lafayette College American University of Paris Dartmouth College Lehigh University Amherst College Davidson College Loyola Marymount University Arizona State University Denison University Loyola University Maryland Auburn University DePaul University Macalester College Babson College Dickinson College Marist College Bard College Drew University Marquette University Barnard College Drexel University Maryland Institute College of Art Bates College Duke University McDaniel College Baylor University Eckerd College McGill University Bentley University Elon University Miami University, Oxford Binghamton University Emerson College Michigan State University Boston College Emory University Middlebury College Boston University Fairfield University Morehouse College Bowdoin College Florida State University Mount Holyoke College Brandeis University Fordham University Mount St. Mary’s University Brown University Franklin & Marshall College Muhlenberg College Bucknell University Furman University New School, The California Institute of Technology George Mason University New York University California Polytechnic State University George Washington University North Carolina State University Carleton College Georgetown University Northeastern University Carnegie Mellon University Georgia Institute of Technology
    [Show full text]
  • Mobile Device Policy
    POLICY : MOBILE DEVICES EFFECTIVE: 1-JULY-2016 CARETAKER : VICE PRESIDENT FOR LIBRARIES AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to secure and protect St. Lawrence University information assets that may be accessed and stored on mobile devices. Mobile devices offer great flexibility and improved productivity for employees, but they can also create added risk and potential targets for data loss. This document describes St. Lawrence University’s requirements for securing the institution’s information on mobile devices. 2.0 SCOPE All employees, students, contractors and consultants must adhere to this policy. This policy applies to all university owned and personal mobile devices with access to St. Lawrence University’s information assets classified as sensitive or protected. St. Lawrence University considers mobile devices to be smart phones, tablets, or other types of highly mobile devices. Laptops are specifically excluded from the scope due to significant differences in security control options. 3.0 POLICY St. Lawrence University has established the following requirements for use of mobile devices based on ISO/IEC and NIST documented standards*. 3.1 USER AND TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS Individuals and their devices accessing St. Lawrence University’s information assets classified as sensitive or protected are subject to the St. Lawrence University Mobile Device Standard. The user is responsible for the backup of their own personal data and St. Lawrence University is not responsible for the loss of data. New York Six Liberal Arts Consortium 1 of 3 Colgate University, Hamilton College, Hobart & William Smith Colleges St. Lawrence University, Skidmore College, Union College 4.0 ENFORCEMENT The institution may temporarily suspend or block access to any individual or device when it appears necessary to do so in order to protect the integrity, security, or functionality of institution and computer resources.
    [Show full text]
  • HAMILTON COLLEGE Student Handbook 2009-2010
    HAMILTON COLLEGE Student Handbook 2009-2010 Hamilton College reserves the right to change requirements, policies, rules and regulations without prior notice, in accordance with established procedures. Table of Contents Code of Student Conduct Guiding Principles………………………………………………………………………...………….. …8 Prohibited Conduct……………………………………………………………………...……………. …9 Judicial Procedures………………………………………………………………………...…………. …9 Point System……………………………………………………………………………..…………… ..14 Honor Code/Honor Court Constitution…………………………………………………...…………... ..16 Honor Code Statement……………………………………………………………………..…………. ..16 Academic Dishonesty………………………………………………….……………………………... ..16 Honor Court Constitution……………………………………………………………..……………… ..17 Appeals Board………………………………………………………………………………………… ..21 Alcohol and Illegal Drug Policy……………………………………………………...………………. ..23 Summary of New York States Laws Governing Alcohol………………………………………..…… ..23 General Policies………………………………………………………………………..…………….....23 Policy for Student-Sponsored Social Events with Alcohol……………………………..……………. ..24 Educational Programs…………………………………………………………...……………………. ..25 Illegal Drug Policy…………………………………………………………..………………..……… ..25 Harassment and Sexual Misconduct Policy…………………………...……………………………… ..28 Sexual Assault Compliance Statement………………………………………..……………………… ..37 Bias Crimes Compliance Statement………………………………………………..………………… ..40 Hazing………………………………………………………………………...………………………. ..41 Private Society Relationship Statement…………………………………………...………………….. ..42 Residential Life Staff, Facilities, and Regulations………………………..………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Periodic Review Report Presented By: Hamilton College Clinton, New York June 1, 2016 Joan Hinde Stewart, President Most Recent Decennial Review: April 2011
    Periodic Review Report Presented by: Hamilton College Clinton, New York June 1, 2016 Joan Hinde Stewart, President Most recent decennial review: April 2011 Table of Contents Section 1: Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... 4 Section 2: Institution Responses to the Previous Evaluation ........................................................................ 6 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Mission and Goals..................................................................................................................................... 6 Leadership, Governance, and Administration ........................................................................................... 9 Integrity ..................................................................................................................................................... 9 Admission, Retention, and Support Services .......................................................................................... 10 Faculty and Educational Offerings ......................................................................................................... 11 Section 3: Current Status – Challenges and Opportunities ......................................................................... 14 Leadership Change .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Colleges & Universities
    Bishop Watterson High School Students Have Been Accepted at These Colleges and Universities Art Institute of Chicago Fordham University Adrian College University of Cincinnati Franciscan University of Steubenville University of Akron Cincinnati Art Institute Franklin and Marshall College University of Alabama The Citadel Franklin University Albion College Claremont McKenna College Furman University Albertus Magnus College Clemson University Gannon University Allegheny College Cleveland Inst. Of Art George Mason University Alma College Cleveland State University George Washington University American Academy of Dramatic Arts Coastal Carolina University Georgetown University American University College of Charleston Georgia Southern University Amherst College University of Colorado at Boulder Georgia Institute of Technology Anderson University (IN) Colorado College University of Georgia Antioch College Colorado State University Gettysburg College Arizona State University Colorado School of Mines Goshen College University of Arizona Columbia College (Chicago) Grinnell College (IA) University of Arkansas Columbia University Hampshire College (MA) Art Academy of Cincinnati Columbus College of Art & Design Hamilton College The Art Institute of California-Hollywood Columbus State Community College Hampton University Ashland University Converse College (SC) Hanover College (IN) Assumption College Cornell University Hamilton College Augustana College Creighton University Harvard University Aurora University University of the Cumberlands Haverford
    [Show full text]
  • IWLCA All-Regional Performers Announced
    IWLCA Names Academic Squads and Merit Squads in Division III Three schools designated as merit squads; 61 other schools also honored The IWLCA has recognized three schools as earning Merit Squad status while 61 other earned Academic Squad honors for the 2010 season. Institutions were named Merit Squads by virtue of having one of the top three team GPAs for the season; every school with a team GPA of 3.0 or higher earned Academic Squad honors. Bates College ranked first with a 3.470 GPA, just edging Washington & Lee University, which posted a 3.458 GPA, and Vassar College, which had a 3.410. Of the 64 institutions, 13 participated in the NCAA Championships, including NCAA runner-up Hamilton College and semifinalists Gettysburg College and Franklin & Marshall College. Merit Squads Bates College Washington & Lee University Vassar College Academic Squads Adrian College Allegheny College Alvernia University Amherst College Bates College Bowdoin College Bridgewater College Bryn Mawr College Buffalo State College Castleton State College The Catholic University of America Centenary College (N.J.) Colby College College of Notre Dame of Maryland Colorado College Connecticut College Denison University Drew University Eastern University Franklin & Marshall College Gettysburg College Hamilton College Haverford College Immaculata University Kenyon College Lynchburg College Manhattanville College Marywood University McDaniel College Messiah College Middlebury College Mount Holyoke College Muhlenberg College Nazareth College SUNY New Paltz Oberlin College Ohio Wesleyan University SUNY Oneonta Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Rochester Inst. of Technology University of Rochester Rowan University Saint Vincent College Salve Regina University Sewanee: The University of the South Skidmore College St. Lawrence University St.
    [Show full text]
  • Class of 2018 College Acceptances
    Class OF 2018 COLLEGE acceptances Academy of Art University Case Western Reserve University - 2 Fordham University - 10 University of Alabama - 4 University of Central Florida Franklin & Marshall College - 4 Allegheny College Chapman University - 2 Franklin Pierce University American University - 6 College of Charleston - 2 Franklin University Switzerland American University of Paris City College of New York CUNY George Washington University - 15 University of the Arts Claremont McKenna College Georgetown University - 4 Assumption College Cleveland Institute of Art Georgia Institute of Technology - 2 Bard College - 4 Colby College - 5 University of Georgia Barnard College - 2 Colgate University - 2 Gettysburg College - 3 Barton College University of Colorado at Boulder - 5 Hamilton College - NY - 2 Bates College - 4 Colorado College - 2 Hampton University Bentley University - 2 Colorado School of Mines University of Hartford Binghamton University - 4 Colorado State University Harvard University Boston College - 6 Columbia University Harvey Mudd College Boston University - 17 Connecticut College - 9 Haverford College Bowdoin College University of Connecticut - 10 University of Hawaii at Manoa Brandeis University Cornell University - 5 Hobart and William Smith Colleges - 12 University of British Columbia - 2 University of Delaware - 2 Hofstra University Brown University - 6 Denison University College of the Holy Cross - 4 Bryant University - 2 University of Denver Howard University Bucknell University - 3 DePaul University Hunter College
    [Show full text]
  • Quick Reference: Data Classification and Handling
    QUICK REFERENCE: DATA CLASSIFICATION AND HANDLING Effective: 09-19-2017 1.0 PURPOSE Classification of data is a critical element of any mature information security program and fundamental to securing New York Six Liberal Arts Consortium (NY6) information assets. This Quick Reference has been developed to assist, provide direction to and govern all entities of the organization regarding identification, classification and handling of information assets. 2.0 DEFINITIONS Data: Information in a specific representation, usually as a sequence of symbols that have meaning. Data Asset: Any entity comprised of data. The terms “information asset” and “data asset” are used interchangeably throughout this document. Source: Committee on National Security Systems Instruction No. 4009 (CNSSI-4009) 3.0 QUICK REFERENCE – COMMON DATA ASSETS The following Quick Reference chart illustrates the most common data assets and their classification. This chart is provided for reference purposes only and is not intended to supersede the Data Classification Policy or Procedure. New York Six Liberal Arts Consortium Colgate University, Hamilton College, Hobart & William Smith Colleges St. Lawrence University, Skidmore College, Union College 1 of 6 COMMON DATA ASSETS Confidential Sensitive Public Common • Privileged attorney client • Faculty and staff • Information authorized to Data Assets communications employment applications, be available on or • Social Security Numbers personnel files, benefits through public website • Credit Card Numbers information, salary, birth
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Campus Operating Status Grid – Fall 2021 PRIMARY APPROACH STATUS DETAILS and TRANSITION FACTORS (High Level)
    Hamilton College COVID-19 Campus Operating Status – Fall 2021 Version 8.31.21 PRIMARY APPROACH • Baseline intent is for a full in person experience (Plan A) • Students and employees are required to be vaccinated unless approved by exemption Fall 2021 Campus • Programs function with pre-COVID approach – including events Status Approach • Offices are fully staffed on campus with some flexibility • Spatial occupancies return to pre-COVID status • Limited canopies will be provided to support outdoor gatherings • Prepare for transition to Plan B or C if needed (requires detailed plans for functional areas) STATUS DETAILS and TRANSITION FACTORS (High Level) Alert Level Blue Action Triggers Green Action Triggers Yellow for Plan B for Plan C Operating Status Plan A Plan B Plan C Campus Proceeding – subject to Change in CDC or NYS Consideration of Increased significant Major reduction Activities/Events COVID policies guidance reduced schedule changes in CDC or NYS guidance Rising prevalence of COVID Testing Vaccinated students and local positive cases All students and Travel restrictions Surveillance – all employees on campus employees on campus students and (weekly) Substantial concern (2x weekly) Rising local positive employees working on over variant spread cases campus (2x weekly) Unvaccinated students Documented impact of and employees (2x variant spread weekly) Page 1 Subject to revision as required by changing events Alert Level Blue Action Triggers Green Action Triggers Yellow for Plan B for Plan C Operating Status Plan A Plan B Plan C
    [Show full text]
  • Colgate University and Hamilton College Announce Joint Membership in Edx
    Embargoed release: March 6, 2014, 9 a.m. Colgate University contact: Tim O’Keeffe, director of web content, [email protected], 315.228.6634 Hamilton College contact: Vige Barrie, senior director of media relations, [email protected], 315-859-4623 Colgate University and Hamilton College announce joint membership in edX Non-profit online learning community offers new opportunities for both institutions Hamilton/Clinton, N.Y. – Colgate University and Hamilton College jointly announced today their partnership as new contributing members in the nonprofit, online learning platform edX. Founded by Harvard University and MIT, edX currently offers more than 150 courses in many areas of study, including the arts and humanities, public health, law, math and computer science. Its focus is to create access to the world’s best education globally, improve on-campus education and conduct research to enhance teaching and learning. Colgate and Hamilton are joining edX along with several major foundations and other global organizations. Among those are Osaka University (Japan), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid and Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (Spain), International Monetary Fund, Learning by Giving Foundation (Buffet family philanthropy), The Linux Foundation and The Smithsonian Institution. With charter edX members Davidson and Wellesley Colleges, Colgate and Hamilton bring to four the number of liberal arts college edX members. As partners, Colgate and Hamilton will offer four online courses within the first year of their engagement with edX. According to Colgate’s Provost and Dean of Faculty Douglas Hicks, “We are enthusiastic about joining the first wave of edX contributing members. The opportunity to partner with Hamilton College was timely.
    [Show full text]
  • Preferred Programs - Hamilton College Last Updated: Nov
    Preferred Programs - Hamilton College last updated: Nov. 21, 2014 Country Host City Program Host Institution and Web Address Year Fall Spring Telephone Argentina Buenos IFSA - Butler Argentine Universities Program Y Y Y 800-858-0229 Aires www.ifsa-butler.org Argentina Buenos SIT Social Movements & Human Rights Y Y 888-272-7881 Aires www.sit.edu/ARR NOT APPROVED FOR HSPST CREDIT Australia Adelaide IFSA - Butler University of Adelaide Y Y Y 800-858-0229 www.ifsa-butler.org Australia Melbourne Arcadia Univ. University of Melbourne Y Y Y 866-927-2234 www.arcadia.edu/abroad Australia Melbourne IFSA - Butler University of Melbourne Y Y Y 800-858-0229 www.ifsa-butler.org Australia Melbourne Arcadia Univ. Victorian College of the Arts Y Y Y 8669272234 www.arcadia.edu/abroad Australia Perth Arcadia Univ. University of Western Australia Y Y Y 866-927-2234 www.arcadia.edu/abroad Australia Perth IFSA - Butler University of Western Australia Y Y Y 800-858-0229 www.ifsa-butler.org Australia Sydney Arcadia Univ. University of Sydney Y Y Y 866-927-2234 www.arcadia.edu/abroad Australia Sydney IFSA - Butler University of Sydney Y Y Y 800-858-0229 www.ifsa-butler.org Brazil Salvador SIT Public Health, Race, and Human Rights Y Y 8882727881 www.sit.edu/BRH Cameroon Yaounde SIT Social Pluralism and Development Y Y 8882727881 www.sit.edu/CMR Chile Arica SIT Public Health, Traditional Medicine, and Community Empowerment Y Y 8882727881 www.sit.edu/CIH NOT APPROVED FOR HSPST CREDIT Chile Santiago SIT Comparative Education and Social Change Y Y 8882727881 www.sit.edu/CIK *NOT APPROVED FOR HSPST CREDIT* Chile Valparaiso SIT Cultural Identity, Soc Justice & Commun Developmnt Y Y 8882727881 www.sit.edu/CIR NOT APPROVED FOR HSPST CREDIT China Beijing Hamilton College Associated Colleges in China Prog Y Y Y 3158594326 http://www.hamilton.edu/academics/eal/Abroad_Link.
    [Show full text]