DOCSLIB.ORG

BFS395 Site Species List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BFS395 Site Species List Species lists based on plot records from DEP (1996), Gibson et al. (1994), Griffin (1993), Keighery (1996) and Weston et al. (1992). Taxonomy and species attributes according to Keighery et al. (2006) as of 16th May 2005. Major Plant Group Significant Species Endemic Growth Form Code Growth Form Life Form Life Form - aquatics Common SSCP Wetland Species BFS No PAGA01 (FCT5) PAGA02 (FCT13) PAGA03 (FCT5) PAGA04 (FCT21a) PAGA05 (FCT17) PAGA06 (FCT25) PAGA07 (FCT21a) PAGA08 (FCT25) Wd? Species Name Common Name Family Acacia cochlearis Rigid Wattle Mimosaceae Dicot WA 3 SH P 395 y Acacia pulchella Prickly Moses Mimosaceae Dicot WA 3 SH P 395 y Acacia saligna Coojong Mimosaceae Dicot WA 3 SH P 395 y y y y Acacia stenoptera Narrow-winged Wattle Mimosaceae Dicot WA 3 SH P 395 y Acacia willdenowiana White Grass Wattle Mimosaceae Dicot WA 3 SH-H P 395 y Acanthocarpus preissii Prickle Lily Dasypogonaceae Monocot WA 4 H-SH P 395 y * Aira caryophyllea Silvery Hairgrass Poaceae Monocot 5 G A 395 y y y Allocasuarina fraseriana Fraser's Sheoak Casuarinaceae Dicot WA 1 T P 395 y * Anagallis arvensis Pimpernel Primulaceae Dicot 4 H A 395 y y Anigozanthos humilis subsp. humilis Catspaw Haemodoraceae Monocot WA 4 H PAB 395 y Aphelia cyperoides Hairy Aphelia Centrolepidaceae Monocot WA 6 S-C A y 395 y Apium prostratum var. prostratum Sea Celery Apiaceae Dicot 4 H P 395 y * Arctotheca calendula Capeweed Asteraceae Dicot 4 H A 395 y Arthropodium capillipes Summer Lily Anthericaceae Monocot WA 4 H PAB 395 y y Astroloma pallidum Astroloma Epacridaceae Dicot WA 3 SH P 395 y y y Austrodanthonia occidentalis Western Wallaby Grass Poaceae Monocot WA 5 G P 395 y y Austrostipa flavescens Tall Speargrass Poaceae Monocot AUST 5 G P 395 y y Banksia attenuata Candle Banksia Proteaceae Dicot WA 1 T P 395 y y Banksia grandis Bull Banksia Proteaceae Dicot WA 1 T P 395 y Banksia littoralis Swamp Banksia Proteaceae Dicot WA 1 T P y 395 y Banksia menziesii Firewood Banksia Proteaceae Dicot WA 1 T P 395 y y Baumea juncea Bare Twigrush Cyperaceae Monocot AUST 6 S-C P y 395 y y y Baumea vaginalis Sheath Twigrush Cyperaceae Monocot WA 6 S-C P y 395 y Bossiaea eriocarpa Common Bossiaea Papilionaceae Dicot WA 3 SH P 395 y y y Brachyloma preissii Globe Heath Epacridaceae Dicot WA 3 SH P 395 y Brachyscome iberidifolia Swan River Daisy Asteraceae Dicot AUST 4 H A 395 y * Briza maxima Blowfly Grass Poaceae Monocot 5 G A 395 y y y y * Briza minor Shivery Grass Poaceae Monocot 5 G A 395 y y y y * Bromus diandrus Great Brome Poaceae Monocot 5 G A 395 y y Burchardia congesta Kara Colchicaceae Monocot WA 4 H PAB 395 y Burchardia multiflora Kara Colchicaceae Monocot WA 4 H PAB y 395 y Caesia micrantha Pale Grasslily Anthericaceae Monocot WA 4 H PAB 395 y y y y Caladenia flava subsp. flava Cowslip Orchid Orchidaceae Monocot WA 4 H PAB 395 y Caladenia latifolia Pink Fairy Orchid Orchidaceae Monocot WA 4 H PAB 395 y y y Caladenia longicauda subsp. calcigena Coastal White Spider Orchid Orchidaceae Monocot WA 4 H PAB 395 y Cassytha racemosa Dodder Laurel Lauraceae Dicot AUST 4 H (CL) P-PAR 395 y Centrolepis alepyroides Slender Centrolepis Centrolepidaceae Monocot WA 6 S-C A AQD y 395 y Page 1 of 6 Species lists based on plot records from DEP (1996), Gibson et al. (1994), Griffin (1993), Keighery (1996) and Weston et al. (1992). Taxonomy and species attributes according to Keighery et al. (2006) as of 16th May 2005. Major Plant Group Significant Species Endemic Growth Form Code Growth Form Life Form Life Form - aquatics Common SSCP Wetland Species BFS No PAGA01 (FCT5) PAGA02 (FCT13) PAGA03 (FCT5) PAGA04 (FCT21a) PAGA05 (FCT17) PAGA06 (FCT25) PAGA07 (FCT21a) PAGA08 (FCT25) Wd? Species Name Common Name Family Centrolepis aristata Pointed Centrolepis Centrolepidaceae Monocot AUST 6 S-C A 395 y * Cerastium glomeratum Sticky Mouse-ear Chickweed Caryophyllaceae Dicot 4 H A 395 y Chamaescilla corymbosa var. corymbosa Blue Squill Anthericaceae Monocot 4 H PAB 395 y y y y y Conostephium preissii Preiss's Pearlflower Epacridaceae Dicot WA 3 SH P 395 y y Conostylis aculeata Prickly Conostylis Haemodoraceae Monocot WA 4 H P 395 y y y y Conostylis juncea Conostylis Haemodoraceae Monocot WA 4 H P 395 y * Conyza sumatrensis Fleabane Asteraceae Dicot 4 H A 395 y Crassula colorata var. colorata Dense Stonecrop Crassulaceae Dicot T 4 H A 395 y Cyathochaeta avenacea Cyathochaeta Cyperaceae Monocot WA 6 S-C P 395 y Dampiera linearis Dampiera Goodeniaceae Dicot WA 4 H-SH P 395 y y Daucus glochidiatus Australian Carrot Apiaceae Dicot 4 H A 395 y y y y Daviesia triflora Three-flowered Daviesia Papilionaceae Dicot WA 3 SH P 395 y y Desmocladus flexuosus Desmocladus Restionaceae Monocot 6 S-R P 395 y y y Dichelachne crinita Plumegrass Poaceae Monocot T 5 G P 395 y y Dillwynia dillwynioides Swamp Dillwynia Papilionaceae Dicot P3/p,s,e WA 3 SH P 395 y Drosera erythrorhiza subsp. erythrorhiza Red Ink Sundew Droseraceae Dicot WA 4 H PAB 395 y y y y Drosera gigantea subsp. gigantea Giant Sundew Droseraceae Dicot WA 4 H PAB y 395 y Drosera glanduligera Sundew Droseraceae Dicot AUST 4 H A 395 y Drosera menziesii subsp. penicillaris Menzies' Rainbow Droseraceae Dicot WA 4 H PAB 395 y y Drosera neesii subsp. neesii Rainbow Droseraceae Dicot WA 4 H PAB y 395 y Drosera nitidula subsp. nitidula Sundew Droseraceae Dicot WA 4 H PAA y 395 y Drosera pallida Rainbow Droseraceae Dicot WA 4 H PAB 395 y Dryandra lindleyana Couch Honeypot Proteaceae Dicot WA 3 SH (PR) P 395 y * Ehrharta calycina Perennial Veldtgrass Poaceae Monocot 5 G P 395 y Epilobium hirtigerum Hairy Willow Herb Onagraceae Dicot 4 H P 395 y * Erodium botrys Long Storksbill Geraniaceae Dicot 4 H A 395 y Eryngium pinnatifidum subsp. pinnatifidum MS Sand Devil Apiaceae Dicot WA 4 H PAB 395 y y y Eucalyptus calophylla Marri Myrtaceae Dicot WA 1 T P 395 y Eucalyptus gomphocephala var. gomphocephala Tuart Myrtaceae Dicot WA 1 T/M P 395 y y y Eucalyptus marginata subsp. marginata Jarrah Myrtaceae Dicot WA 1 T P 395 y Eucalyptus rudis subsp. rudis Flooded Gum Myrtaceae Dicot WA 1 T P y 395 y y y Eutaxia virgata Eutaxia Papilionaceae Dicot WA 3 SH P y 395 y y Gahnia trifida Coast Sawsedge Cyperaceae Monocot AUST 6 S-C P y 395 y Gastrolobium capitatum Common Nemcia Papilionaceae Dicot WA 3 SH P 395 y * Geranium molle Dovesfoot Cranesbill Geraniaceae Dicot 4 H A 395 y Gompholobium tomentosum Common Gompholobium Papilionaceae Dicot WA 3 SH P 395 y y Goodenia pulchella Goodenia Goodeniaceae Dicot WA 4 H P y 395 y y Page 2 of 6 Species lists based on plot records from DEP (1996), Gibson et al. (1994), Griffin (1993), Keighery (1996) and Weston et al. (1992). Taxonomy and species attributes according to Keighery et al. (2006) as of 16th May 2005. Major Plant Group Significant Species Endemic Growth Form Code Growth Form Life Form Life Form - aquatics Common SSCP Wetland Species BFS No PAGA01 (FCT5) PAGA02 (FCT13) PAGA03 (FCT5) PAGA04 (FCT21a) PAGA05 (FCT17) PAGA06 (FCT25) PAGA07 (FCT21a) PAGA08 (FCT25) Wd? Species Name Common Name Family Grevillea crithmifolia Grevillea Proteaceae Dicot WA 3 SH P 395 y Haemodorum laxum Haemodorum Haemodoraceae Monocot WA 4 H PAB 395 y Hakea varia Variable-leaved Hakea Proteaceae Dicot WA 3 SH P y 395 y y y Hardenbergia comptoniana Hardenbergia Papilionaceae Dicot WA 3 SH (CL) P 395 y * Heliophila pusilla Heliophila Brassicaceae Dicot 4 H A 395 y y Hibbertia hypericoides Common Hibbertia Dilleniaceae Dicot WA 3 SH P 395 y y y Hibbertia racemosa Stalked Hibbertia Dilleniaceae Dicot WA 3 SH P 395 y y y Hibbertia stellaris Swamp Hibbertia Dilleniaceae Dicot WA 3 SH P y 395 y y * Holcus setiger Annual Fog Poaceae Monocot 5 G A 395 y y Homalosciadium homalocarpum Homahoma Apiaceae Dicot WA 4 H A 395 y Hovea trisperma var. trisperma Common Hovea Papilionaceae Dicot WA 3 SH P 395 y y y Hybanthus calycinus Native Violet Violaceae Dicot WA 4 H-SH P 395 y y Hydrocotyle diantha Pennywort Apiaceae Dicot WA 4 H A 395 y * Hypochaeris glabra Flatweed Asteraceae Dicot 4 H A 395 y y y y y y Hypolaena exsulca Hypolaena Restionaceae Monocot 6 S-R P 395 y y y Hypolaena pubescens Hypolaena Restionaceae Monocot 6 S-R P y 395 y * Isolepis marginata Coarse Clubrush Cyperaceae Monocot T 6 S-C A 395 y Isotropis cuneifolia subsp. cuneifolia Granny's Bonnets Papilionaceae Dicot WA 4 H-SH P 395 y y Jacksonia furcellata Grey Stinkwood Papilionaceae Dicot WA 3 SH/T P 395 y * Juncus bufonius Toadrush Juncaceae Monocot 6 S-J A 395 y Juncus pallidus Giant Rush Juncaceae Monocot T 6 S-J P y 395 y Kunzea glabrescens Spearwood Myrtaceae Dicot WA 3 SH P 395 y Lagenophora huegelii Western Lagenophora Asteraceae Dicot AUST 4 H PAB 395 y y y y Lechenaultia expansa Leschenaultia Goodeniaceae Dicot WA 4 H-SH P 395 y Lepidosperma longitudinale Swamp Swordsedge Cyperaceae Monocot AUST 6 S-C P y 395 y y y Lepidosperma squamatum Common Lepidosperma Cyperaceae Monocot WA 6 S-C P 395 y y y y Leporella fimbriata Hare Orchid Orchidaceae Monocot WA 4 H PAB 395 y Lepyrodia glauca Lepyrodia Restionaceae Monocot 6 S-R P 395 y Lepyrodia muirii Lepyrodia Restionaceae Monocot 6 S-R P y 395 y Leucopogon propinquus Beard Heath Epacridaceae Dicot WA 3 SH P 395 y y Levenhookia stipitata Common Stylewort Stylidiaceae Dicot WA 4 H A 395 y y Lobelia alata Angled Lobelia Lobeliaceae Dicot T 4 H P y 395 y Lobelia tenuior Slender Lobelia Lobeliaceae Dicot WA 4 H A 395 y y y Lomandra caespitosa Tufted Lomandra Dasypogonaceae Monocot WA 4 H P 395 yy yy Lomandra hermaphrodita Lomandra Dasypogonaceae Monocot WA 4 H P 395 y Lomandra sericea Silky Lomandra Dasypogonaceae Monocot WA 4 H P 395 y y Lomandra suaveolens Lomandra Dasypogonaceae Monocot WA 4 H P 395 y Page 3 of 6 Species lists based on plot records from DEP (1996), Gibson et al.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • General View of a Small Patch of Phylloglossum Plants. As Is Normal
    . Fig. 1- General view of a small patch of Phylloglossum plants. As is normal in most populations there are many more sterile plants than fertile and a great range of sizes of plants are found. The 5-cent coin is about 2 cm in diameter and provides a convenient scale. 28 Phylloglossum Miniature Denizen of the North /. E. Braggins, Auckland Phylloglossum drummondii, first described by Kunze, a German botanist, in 1843, is a very small plant related to the lycopodiums or club mosses. In addition to New Zealand it is found in Western Australia, Tasmania, and Victoria. There is only one species of Phylloglossum, and because of its small size and habit of growing in low sedge and scrub it is not often detected. Furthermore it has a short growing season when it is above ground (May-June till September-October), and few botanists know it in the field. The description in Allan's Flora of New Zealand tells us that it is "... a plant up to 5 cm long, rarely more; leaves linear, acute, usually few, seldom more than 10, about 2 cm long". The stalk or peduncle of the fruiting part is described as 3-4 cm long, with a strobilus (sport-bearing part) about 7 mm long. The generic description having already said that the strobilus was terminal and roots scanty, we have some idea what the plant may look like, though words cannot convey adequately the appearance of this unusual little plant (Fig. 1). In New Zealand Phylloglossum is often regarded as a typical kauri and burnt-over scrubland plant.
    [Show full text]
  • Actes Du 15E Colloque Sur Les Orchidées De La Société Française D’Orchidophilie
    Cah. Soc. Fr. Orch., n° 7 (2010) – Actes 15e colloque de la Société Française d’Orchidophilie, Montpellier Actes du 15e colloque sur les Orchidées de la Société Française d’Orchidophilie du 30 mai au 1er juin 2009 Montpellier, Le Corum Comité d’organisation : Daniel Prat, Francis Dabonneville, Philippe Feldmann, Michel Nicole, Aline Raynal-Roques, Marc-Andre Selosse, Bertrand Schatz Coordinateurs des Actes Daniel Prat & Bertrand Schatz Affiche du Colloque : Conception : Francis Dabonneville Photographies de Francis Dabonneville & Bertrand Schatz Cahiers de la Société Française d’Orchidophilie, N° 7, Actes du 15e Colloque sur les orchidées de la Société Française d’Orchidophilie. ISSN 0750-0386 © SFO, Paris, 2010 Certificat d’inscription à la commission paritaire N° 55828 ISBN 978-2-905734-17-4 Actes du 15e colloque sur les Orchidées de la Société Française d’Orchidophilie, D. Prat et B. Schatz, Coordinateurs, SFO, Paris, 2010, 236 p. Société Française d’Orchidophilie 17 Quai de la Seine, 75019 Paris Cah. Soc. Fr. Orch., n° 7 (2010) – Actes 15e colloque de la Société Française d’Orchidophilie, Montpellier Préface Ce 15e colloque marque le 40e anniversaire de notre société, celle-ci ayant vu le jour en 1969. Notre dernier colloque se tenait il y a 10 ans à Paris en 1999, 10 ans c’est long, 10 ans c’est très loin. Il fallait que la SFO renoue avec cette traditionnelle organisation de colloques, manifestation qui a contribué à lui accorder la place prépondérante qu’elle occupe au sein des orchidophiles français et de la communauté scientifique. C’est chose faite aujourd’hui. Nombreux sont les thèmes qui font l’objet de communications par des intervenants dont les compétences dans le domaine de l’orchidologie ne sont plus à prouver.
    [Show full text]
  • An Approach to the Problem of Taxonomy and Classification in the Study of Sporae Dispersae
    AN APPROACH TO THE PROBLEM OF TAXONOMY AND CLASSIFICATION IN THE STUDY OF SPORAE DISPERSAE D. C. BHARDWAJ Birbal~i Institute of Palaeobotany, Lucknow ABSTRACT ( 1950 ) system, the American workers prefer The present state of disagreement among spore that of Schopf, Wilson and Bentall's ( 1944), workers with regard to the taxonomy and classi• in Germany, an amplification of Ibrahim's fication of Sporae dispersae has been reviewed. ( 1933) system is mostly in vogue and the The taxonomic categories for Sporae dispersae have Russian workers classify according to Nau• been defined and practicability of organ-genus concept over the form-genus concept for the circum• mova's (1937) system. This tendency to scription of spore taxa has been discussed. stick to one or the other of these systems, none of which excels the others, has uncons• ciously led to thwart the evolution of one such INTRODUCTION system of classification for the Sporae dis• persae which may be universally followed. Of late, in view of the greater applied use of DETAILEDand pollen,studyrecoveredof the dispersedfrom sedimen•spores Sporae dispersae in coal and oil prospecting, tary strata, dates back to Reinsch the need for a universally accepted standard ( 1881) when he described some of them from system of classification for these is being coals of the Carboniferous age. Thereafter, increasingly felt so that assimilation of data for several decades, these dispersed micro• from all over the world can be more easily remains attracted occasional attention of achieved. palaeobotanists
    [Show full text]
  • (Lycopodiaceae) in the State of Veracruz, Mexico
    Mongabay.com Open Access Journal - Tropical Conservation Science Vol.8 (1): 114-137, 2015 Research article Distribution and conservation status of Phlegmariurus (Lycopodiaceae) in the state of Veracruz, Mexico Samaria Armenta-Montero1, César I. Carvajal-Hernández1, Edward A. Ellis1 and Thorsten Krömer1* 1Centro de Investigaciones Tropicales, Universidad Veracruzana, Casco de la Ex Hacienda Lucas Martín, Privada de Araucarias S/N. Col. Periodistas, C.P. 91019, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract The fern and lycophyte flora of Mexico contains 13 species in the genus Phlegmariurus (Lycopodiaceae; club moss family), of which nine are found in the state of Veracruz (P. cuernavacensis, P. dichotomus, P. linifolius, P. myrsinites, P. orizabae, P. pithyoides, P. pringlei, P. reflexus , P. taxifolius). They are located primarily in undisturbed areas of humid montane, pine-oak and tropical humid forests, which are all ecosystems threatened by deforestation and fragmentation. The objective of this study was to evaluate and understand the distribution and conservation status of species of this genus in the state of Veracruz, Mexico. Using Maxent, probability distributions were modeled based on 173 herbarium specimens (25% from recent collections by the authors and/or collaborators), considering factors such as climate, elevation and vegetation cover. Additionally, anthropogenic impacts on the original habitat of each species were analyzed in order to assign threatened categories based on IUCN classifications at regional levels. Results show that potential distributions are located in the montane regions of the central and southern parts of the state. All nine Phlegmariurus species in Veracruz were found to be in some category of risk, with P.
    [Show full text]
  • Muelleria Vol 32, 2014
    Muelleria 36: 22–50 Published online in advance of the print edition, 16 March 2018. A passion for plants: The botanical contribution of collector P.J. Murphy Susan Kruss Collaborative Research Centre in Australian History, Federation University, Ballarat, Victoria. email: [email protected] Abstract Introduction ‘Collector: Murphy, P.J.’ listed on the The contribution of women to Australian botany has not yet been fully online Australasian Virtual Herbarium, explored. Pat Murphy’s contribution was significant both in her local area collected plant specimens from and through the 1138 specimens she collected that are now held at the the early 1980s to 2006. Fifteen specimens were sent to the National National Herbarium, Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria (MEL). Pat’s story Herbarium of Victoria during her extends the history of collectors and collecting beyond the colonial era lifetime, and the remaining collection into the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, a period as yet only lightly of 1123 specimens was donated to touched on in the history of botany. One advantage of examining a more the Herbarium in 2007. Who was P.J. recent collector is the availability of people who knew Pat and whose Murphy, why did she collect, and what can be discovered by examining memories of her can be accessed through oral history interviews. The Field her collection of specimens? Much Naturalists’ Club of Ballarat (FNCB) provided the context for Pat’s learning of the information in this article is about botany and her involvement in collecting (Fig. 1a,b). I was able to derived from the minutes of the Field Naturalists’ Club of Ballarat (FNCB) and from interviews with her husband, Bill Murphy, and members of FNCB.
    [Show full text]
  • JUDD W.S. Et. Al. (2002) Plant Systematics: a Phylogenetic Approach. Chapter 7. an Overview of Green
    UNCORRECTED PAGE PROOFS An Overview of Green Plant Phylogeny he word plant is commonly used to refer to any auto- trophic eukaryotic organism capable of converting light energy into chemical energy via the process of photosynthe- sis. More specifically, these organisms produce carbohydrates from carbon dioxide and water in the presence of chlorophyll inside of organelles called chloroplasts. Sometimes the term plant is extended to include autotrophic prokaryotic forms, especially the (eu)bacterial lineage known as the cyanobacteria (or blue- green algae). Many traditional botany textbooks even include the fungi, which differ dramatically in being heterotrophic eukaryotic organisms that enzymatically break down living or dead organic material and then absorb the simpler products. Fungi appear to be more closely related to animals, another lineage of heterotrophs characterized by eating other organisms and digesting them inter- nally. In this chapter we first briefly discuss the origin and evolution of several separately evolved plant lineages, both to acquaint you with these important branches of the tree of life and to help put the green plant lineage in broad phylogenetic perspective. We then focus attention on the evolution of green plants, emphasizing sev- eral critical transitions. Specifically, we concentrate on the origins of land plants (embryophytes), of vascular plants (tracheophytes), of 1 UNCORRECTED PAGE PROOFS 2 CHAPTER SEVEN seed plants (spermatophytes), and of flowering plants dons.” In some cases it is possible to abandon such (angiosperms). names entirely, but in others it is tempting to retain Although knowledge of fossil plants is critical to a them, either as common names for certain forms of orga- deep understanding of each of these shifts and some key nization (e.g., the “bryophytic” life cycle), or to refer to a fossils are mentioned, much of our discussion focuses on clade (e.g., applying “gymnosperms” to a hypothesized extant groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Sci 2009 Bergh N G.Pdf
    The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgementTown of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Cape Published by the University ofof Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University Systematics of the Relhaniinae (Asteraceae- Gnaphalieae) in southern Africa: geography and evolution in an endemic Cape plant lineage. Nicola Georgina Bergh Town Thesis presented for theCape Degree of DOCTOR OF ofPHILOSOPHY in the Department of Botany UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN University May 2009 Town Cape of University ii ABSTRACT The Greater Cape Floristic Region (GCFR) houses a flora unique for its diversity and high endemicity. A large amount of the diversity is housed in just a few lineages, presumed to have radiated in the region. For many of these lineages there is no robust phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships, and few Cape plants have been examined for the spatial distribution of their population genetic variation. Such studies are especially relevant for the Cape where high rates of species diversification and the ongoing maintenance of species proliferation is hypothesised. Subtribe Relhaniinae of the daisy tribe Gnaphalieae is one such little-studied lineage. The taxonomic circumscription of this subtribe, the biogeography of its early diversification and its relationships to other members of the Gnaphalieae are elucidated by means of a dated phylogenetic hypothesis. Molecular DNA sequence data from both chloroplast and nuclear genomes are used to reconstruct evolutionary history using parsimony and Bayesian tools for phylogeny estimation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecologia Mediterranea
    ecologia mediterranea Revue Internationale d'Ecologie Méditerranéenne International Journal of Mediterranean Ecology Ecologie et conservation des mares temporaires méditerranéennes: l'exemple des mares de la Réserve Naturelle de Roque-Haute (Hérault, France) TOME 24· fascicule 2 • 1998 ISSN :0153-8756 REDACTEURS/ED/TORS COORDINATRICE / COORD/NATOR Frédéric MEDAIL Sophie BOUDEMAGHE Philip ROCHE Thierry TATONI TRESORIER / TREASURER Frédéric MAGNIN Jacques-Louis de BEAULIEU FONDATEUR/POUNDER Prof. Pierre QUEZEL COMITE DE LECTURE / ADV/SORY BOARD ARONSON J., CEFE CNRS, Montpellier LE FLOC'H E., CEFE CNRS, Montpellier BARBERO M., IMEP, Univ. Aix-Marseille III MARGARIS N. S., Univ. of the Aegan, Mytilène, Grèce BROCK M., Univ. ofNew England, Arrnidale, Australie OVALLE c., CSI Quilamapu, INIA, Chili CHEYLAN M., EPHE, Montpellier PEDROTTI F., Univ. degli Studi, Camerino, Italie DEBUSSCHE M., CEFE CNRS, Montpellier PLEGUEZUELOS 1. M., Univ. de Grenade, Espagne FADY 8., INRA, Avignon PONEL P., IMEP, CNRS, Marseille GOODFRIEND G. A., Carnegie Inst. W<H1ington, USA PRODON R., Labo. Arago, Univ. P. M. Curie, Paris VI GRILLAS P., Station Biologique Tour du Valat, Arles RICHARDSON D. M., Univ.Cape Town, Afrique du Sud GUIOT J., IMEP, CNRS, Marseille SANS F. X., Univ. de Barcelone, Espagne HOBBS R. 1., CSIRO, Midland, Australie SCHMIDA A., Hebrew Univ. of Jemsalem, Israël KRElTER S., ENSA-M INRA, Montpellier URBINATI C., Agripolis, Legnaro, Italie ecologia mediterranea Faculté des Sciences et Techniques de Saint Jérôme Institut Méditerranéen d'Ecologie et de Paléoécologie, case 461 13397 MARSEILLE Cedex 20 FRANCE Tél. : + 33491288976 - Fax: + 33491288051 E-mail: [email protected] URL: http://www.ecologia.fst.u-3mrs.fr Abonnements / Subscription Un an = deux numéros / one year = two issues: France: 400 F + 60 F de frais de port Europe : 400 F + 80 F de frais de port Amérique, Afrique, Asie: 400 F + 120 F de frais de port Tous les fascicules de la revue sont disponibles.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER?
    Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology ISSN: 1409-3871 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica BACKHOUSE, GARY N. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology, vol. 7, núm. 1-2, marzo, 2007, pp. 28- 43 Universidad de Costa Rica Cartago, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44339813005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative LANKESTERIANA 7(1-2): 28-43. 2007. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA GARY N. BACKHOUSE Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Division, Department of Sustainability and Environment 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002 Australia [email protected] KEY WORDS:threatened orchids Australia conservation status Introduction Many orchid species are included in this list. This paper examines the listing process for threatened Australia has about 1700 species of orchids, com- orchids in Australia, compares regional and national prising about 1300 named species in about 190 gen- lists of threatened orchids, and provides recommen- era, plus at least 400 undescribed species (Jones dations for improving the process of listing regionally 2006, pers. comm.). About 1400 species (82%) are and nationally threatened orchids. geophytes, almost all deciduous, seasonal species, while 300 species (18%) are evergreen epiphytes Methods and/or lithophytes. At least 95% of this orchid flora is endemic to Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Locally Threatened Plants in Manningham
    Locally Threatened Plants in Manningham Report by Dr Graeme S. Lorimer, Biosphere Pty Ltd, to Manningham City Council Version 1.0, 28 June, 2010 Executive Summary A list has been compiled containing 584 plant species that have been credibly recorded as indigenous in Manningham. 93% of these species have been assessed by international standard methods to determine whether they are threatened with extinction in Manningham. The remaining 7% of species are too difficult to assess within the scope of this project. It was found that nineteen species can be confidently presumed to be extinct in Manningham. Two hundred and forty-six species, or 42% of all indigenous species currently growing in Manningham, fall into the ‘Critically Endangered’ level of risk of extinction in the municipality. This is an indication that if current trends continue, scores of plant species could die out in Manningham over the next decade or so – far more than have become extinct since first settlement. Another 21% of species fall into the next level down on the threat scale (‘Endangered’) and 17% fall into the third (‘Vulnerable’) level. The total number of threatened species (i.e. in any of the aforementioned three levels) is 466, representing 82% of all indigenous species that are not already extinct in Manningham. These figures indicate that conservation of indigenous flora in Manningham is at a critical stage. This also has grave implications for indigenous fauna. Nevertheless, corrective measures are possible and it is still realistic to aim to maintain the existence of every indigenous plant species presently in the municipality. The scope of this study has not allowed much detail to be provided about corrective measures except in the case of protecting threatened species under the Manningham Planning Scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • BFS089 Site Species List
    Species lists based on plot records from DEP (1996), Gibson et al. (1994), Griffin (1993), Keighery (1996) and Weston et al. (1992). Taxonomy and species attributes according to Keighery et al. (2006) as of 16th May 2005. ) Species Name Common Name Family Major Plant Group Significant Species Endemic Growth Form Code Growth Form Life Form Life Form - aquatics Common SSCP Wetland Species BFS No PEARCE01 (FCT6) PEARCE02 (FCT3c Wd? Acacia lasiocarpa var. bracteolata long peduncle variant(G.J.Keighery 5026) PN Clay Moses Mimosaceae Dicot P1/p,s,e WA 3 SH P y 89 y Amblysperma spathulata Native Gerbera Asteraceae Dicot s WA 4 H PAB 89 y Borya sphaerocephala Swamp Pincushions Boryaceae Monocot WA 4 H P y 89 y * Briza maxima Blowfly Grass Poaceae Monocot 5 G A 89 y y Centrolepis aristata Pointed Centrolepis Centrolepidaceae Monocot AUST 6 S-C A 89 y Centrolepis inconspicua Centrolepis Centrolepidaceae Monocot WA 6 S-C A 89 y Chamaescilla versicolor Blue Squill Anthericaceae Monocot WA 4 H PAB 89 y * Cicendia filiformis Cicendia Gentianaceae Dicot 4 H A 89 y Cyathochaeta avenacea Cyathochaeta Cyperaceae Monocot WA 6 S-C P 89 y * Cyperus tenellus Tiny Flat Sedge Cyperaceae Monocot 6 S-C P 89 y Dampiera coronata Dampiera Goodeniaceae Dicot WA 4 H-SH P 89 y Daviesia angulata Daviesia Papilionaceae Dicot WA 3 SH P 89 y Daviesia decurrens subsp. decurrens MS Daviesia Papilionaceae Dicot WA 3 SH P 89 y Daviesia horrida Horrible Daviesia Papilionaceae Dicot WA 3 SH P 89 y Desmocladus flexuosus Desmocladus Restionaceae Monocot 6 S-R P 89 y y Dianella revoluta var.
    [Show full text]
  • Thelymitra Species (Orchidaceae) and Their Hybrids in Western Australia
    Volume 15: 165–183 ELOPEA Publication date: 8 November 2013 T dx.doi.org/10.7751/telopea2013020 Journal of Plant Systematics plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/Telopea • escholarship.usyd.edu.au/journals/index.php/TEL • ISSN 0312-9764 (Print) • ISSN 2200-4025 (Online) Floral biology of large-flowered Thelymitra species (Orchidaceae) and their hybrids in Western Australia Retha Edens-Meier1, Eric Westhus2 and Peter Bernhardt2 1Department of Educational Studies, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA 63103 2Dept. of Biology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA 63013 Abstract Historically, only a few large flowered species in the genus Thelymitra were identified as obligate out-breeders. We compared floral presentation, pollen-pistil interactions, pollination ecology, and interspecific hybridization in two populations of T. macrophylla where its flowering periods overlapped with T. antennifera (Tenterden) and T. crinita (Lesmurdie) respectively. Pollen-pistil interactions were studied using glasshouse collections of T. crinita and T. macrophylla at KPBG. The number of flowers per inflorescence in T. macrophylla varied significantly between sites. Climatic conditions influenced flower opening and closing regimes differently in T. crinita vs. T. macrophylla. While all three Thelymitra species opened on warm, sunny mornings and closed by late afternoon, T. crinita at Lesmurdie was significantly more likely to open its perianth segments on cool days compared to the co-blooming, sympatric flowers of T. macrophylla. The floral lifespans of individual flowers of T. macrophylla and T. crinita were reduced significantly following application of Thelymitra pollen onto the stigmatic surface but were not reduced by pollinarium removal. Flowers of both species were self-compatible but neither species self-pollinated mechanically (autogamy).
    [Show full text]