Financing Metropolitan Governments in Developing Countries

Financing Metropolitan Governments Bahl Linn in Developing Countries Wetzel Edited by Roy W. Bahl, Johannes F. Linn, and Deborah L. Wetzel Financing Metropolitan Governments Governments Metropolitan Financing or the first time in human history, more people live in urban rather than rural Fareas; the number of metropolitan cities in developing countries far exceeds those in advanced economies; and the governance of megacities is of greater importance as national finances have become precarious. This book skillfully weaves together the theory and history of metropolitan finance with illustrative case studies, which offer deep insights into metropolitan financial governance in Brazil, India, and China, among in other countries. The authors address the politics of metropolitan government, the mys- Developing Countries Developing teries of the underutilized instrument of the property tax, and the question of financing urban infrastructure. This is an indispensable volume for policy makers and for those who care about the future of metropolitan cities. — Rakesh Mohan Executive Director, International Monetary Fund he economic and political future of the developing world depends crucially on the Tongoing processes of urbanization. The essays in this volume, by leading scholars Financing Metropolitan intimately associated with these issues, provide a deep analysis of the critical role of metropolitan governance and financial structure in urbanization. It is the best treatment available: a wide-ranging and penetrating exploration of both theory and practice. Governments in — Wallace E. Oates Professor of Economics, Emeritus Developing Countries University of Maryland Edited by his well-written and informative book will put local governments, especially in Roy W. Bahl, Johannes F. Linn, and Deborah L. Wetzel Tmetropolitan areas, on the map of public finance, where they belong. The importance of global and local public finance has grown world-wide along with national public finance, which has received most of the attention in the past. This book will surely contribute to that change. It contains a wealth of hard-to-get information on issues that range from how particular cities are financed to the complex fiscal arrangements in China. It is definitely a must-read book for public finance scholars. — Vito Tanzi Former Director of Fiscal Affairs, International Monetary Fund Cover design by Joyce Weston Cover photographs (top): iStockphoto/Celso Diniz Photography ISBN 978-1-55844-254-2 (bottom): iStockphoto/Dominique Landau Financing Metropolitan Governments in Developing Countries Edited by Roy W. Bahl Johannes F. Linn Debor ah L. Wetzel © 2013 by the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Financing metropolitan governments in developing countries / edited by Roy W. Bahl, Johannes F. Linn, Deborah L. Wetzel. pages cm Includes index. ISBN 978- 1- 55844- 254- 2 (alk. paper) 1. Municipal fi nance— Developing countries. 2. Finance, Public— Developing countries. 3. Local taxation— Developing countries. 4. Municipal government— Developing countries. 5. Municipal fi nance— Developing countries— Case studies. 6. Finance, Public— Developing countries— Case studies. 7. Local taxation— Developing countries— Case studies. 8. Municipal government— Developing countries— Case studies. I. Bahl, Roy W. II. Linn, Johannes F. III. Wetzel, Deborah L. HJ9695.F663 2013 352.4'216091724—dc23 2013001063 Designed by Westchester Publishing Ser vices Composed in 10.5/13 Minion, by Westchester Publishing Ser vices in Danbury, Connecticut. Printed and bound by Puritan Press Inc., in Hollis, New Hampshire. Th e paper is Rolland Enviro100, an acid- free, 100 percent PCW recycled sheet. MANUFACTURED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Contents List of Illustrations vii Foreword xi DOUGLAS H. KEARE 1 Governing and Financing Metropolitan Areas in the Developing World 1 ROY W. BAHL, JOHANNES F. LINN, and DEBORAH L. WETZEL 2 Metropolitan Cities: Th eir Rise, Role, and Future 31 SHAHID YUSUF 3 Metropolitan Cities in the National Fiscal and Institutional Structure 57 PAUL SMOKE 4 Th e Decentralization of Governance in Metropolitan Areas 85 ROY W. BAHL 5 Institutions and Politics of Metropolitan Management 107 INDER SUD and SERDAR YILMAZ 6 Metropolitan Public Finance: An Overview 135 RICHARD M. BIRD and ENID SLACK 7 Property Taxes in Metropolitan Cities 159 WILLIAM J. MCCLUSKEY and RIËL C. D. FRANZSEN 8 Local Nonproperty Revenues 183 JORGE MARTINEZ- VAZQUEZ 9 Grant Financing of Metropolitan Areas: A Review of Principles and Worldwide Practices 213 ANWAR M. SHAH 10 Metropolitan Public Finances: Th e Case of Mumbai 243 ABHAY PETHE 11 Paying for Urbanization in China: Challenges of Municipal Finance in the Twenty- First Century 273 CHRISTINE P. WONG vi n Contents 12 Metropolitan Governance and Finance in São Paulo 309 DEBORAH L. WETZEL 13 Metropolitan Infrastructure and Capital Finance 339 GREGORY K. INGRAM, ZHI LIU, and KARIN L. BRANDT 14 Slum Upgrading 367 MARIA E. FREIRE 15 External Assistance for Urban Finance Development: Needs, Strategies, and Implementation 393 HOMI KHARAS and JOHANNES F. LINN Contributors 421 Index 423 About the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy 431 Local Nonproperty Revenues 8 JORGE MARTINEZ- VAZQUEZ his chapter focuses on the current theory and practice of nonproperty tax as- Tsignments to local urban governments in developing and developed countries. Bahl and Linn (1992) concluded that if urban government revenues were to be vi- able for fi nancing urban public ser vice delivery, broad- based taxes other than the property tax would be needed in the revenue assignment mix. How good a predic- tion has this been? Although the theoretical rationale is clear for the presence of a basket of tax in- struments, since the marginal resource costs are increasing for any single source, and many urban governments rely on a variety of revenue sources other than property taxation and transfers, the international experience in both developing and developed countries, as described in this chapter, is mixed and uneven. While a few urban governments have introduced eco nom ical ly attractive tax sources other than the property tax, a vast majority of urban governments in developing countries, and also in many developed countries, still struggle with the imperative of revenue adequacy to cover their growing expenditure needs and obligations. Th e good news is that examples of best practices are not scarce; the bad news is that there is still an extended failure in applying those best practices in the vast majority of urban governments around the world. Th is chapter is or ga nized as follows. First the theoretical foundations for the use of taxes other than the property tax in local governments are reviewed. Th e discus- sion includes the kind of guidance provided by optimal tax theory and the issues to be considered in making tax administration choices (e.g., central vs. local). Next, actual practices in tax assignments are surveyed; special attention is paid to po liti cal I am grateful to Gustavo Canavire- Bacarreza and Violeta Vulovic for helping or ga nize the data collection and to Krishanu Karmakar, Gabriel Leonardo, and Janet Porras for participating in the data collection. I am also grateful to Charles McLure, Robert Ebel, Roy Bahl, Johannes Linn, and Deborah Wetzel for helpful comments. n 183 n 184 n Jorge Martinez- Vazquez economy and institutional capacity issues as potential drivers for the observed dif- ferences between an optimal metropolitan revenue system and those that are actu- ally observed. Th e chapter concludes by extracting lessons from the global experience with nonproperty tax revenue sources and exploring reform directions for urban fi nance in developing and developed countries. Theoretical Foundations of Subnational Revenue Assignments Although over the last several de cades there have been signifi cant advances in the development of a theoretical framework for tax assignments to subnational governments, a complete general framework is still lacking. The Relevance of Revenue Assignments Th e fundamental promise of fi scal decentralization is that public spending will become more effi cient because decentralized governments will be not only more informed (Hayek 1945) but also more responsive and accountable to citizens’ needs and preferences (Oates 1972). At the same time, there is general agreement among experts in decentralization that increased accountability is best assured when subnational governments have an adequate level of autonomy and discretion in raising their own- source revenues. Th us, if eff ective fi scal decentralization requires meaningful revenue autonomy at the subnational level, which taxes should be allocated at these levels? How much revenue autonomy is needed? Th is is what is known as the “tax assignment problem” (see, e.g., Bird 2000b; Martinez- Vazquez, McLure, and Vaillancourt 2006; McLure 1998). Th e basic role of revenue assignments is to provide adequate fi nancing to subnational governments so they can implement the functions they have been assigned. However, revenue adequacy per se is not a guide for tax assignments because adequate fi nancing can be obtained from many diff erent tax assignments or even without them through intergovernmental transfers. The “Beneﬁ t Principle”: How Far Does It Take Us? To answer the question of how to tax at the local level, the public fi nance literature has used the “benefi t principle” (Lindahl 1919; Musgrave 1938): those that use the ser vice should pay for its costs. If it could be fully used, there is no other approach to urban local fi nance with the same potential to or ga nize the fi nancial architecture of local governments. Th e benefi t principle tells us how ser vices should be priced, who should pay for them, and how much of the ser vice should be provided. How- ever, the power and simplicity of the benefi t principle are diminished by a series of factors. First, within the complexity of institutional arrangements in many urban set- tings, it is not always necessarily obvious who should be paid because it is unclear Part of this section builds on Martinez- Vazquez (2008).

Load more