Friday 5 June
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Community Structure of Parasites of the Tree Frog Scinax Fuscovarius (Anura, Hylidae) from Campo Belo Do Sul, Santa Catarina, Brazil
ISSN Versión impresa 2218-6425 ISSN Versión Electrónica 1995-1043 ORIGINAL ARTICLE /ARTÍCULO ORIGINAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE OF PARASITES OF THE TREE FROG SCINAX FUSCOVARIUS (ANURA, HYLIDAE) FROM CAMPO BELO DO SUL, SANTA CATARINA, BRAZIL ESTRUCTURA DE LA COMUNIDAD PARASITARIA DE LA RANA ARBORICOLA SCINAX FUSCOVARIUS (ANURA, HYLIDAE) DE CAMPO BELO DO SUL, SANTA CATARINA, BRASIL Viviane Gularte Tavares dos Santos1,2; Márcio Borges-Martins1,3 & Suzana B. Amato1,2 1 Departamento de Zoologia, Programa de Pós-graduação em Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 91501-970, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. 2 Laboratório de Helmintologia; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 91501-970, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. 3 Laboratório de Herpetologia. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 91501-970, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Neotropical Helminthology, 2016, 10(1), ene-jun: 41-50. ABSTRACT Sixty specimens of Scinax fuscovarius (Lutz, 1925) were collected between May 2009 and October 2011 at Campo Belo do Sul, State of Santa Catarina, Brazil, and necropsied in search of helminth parasites. Only four helminth species were found: Pseudoacanthocephalus sp. Petrochenko, 1958, Cosmocerca brasiliense Travassos, 1925, C. parva Travassos, 1925 and Physaloptera sp. Rudolphi, 1819 (larvae). The genus of the female cosmocercids could not be determined. Only 30% of the anurans were parasitized. Scinax fuscovarius presented low prevalence, infection intensity, and parasite richness. Sex and size of S. fuscovarius individuals did not influence the prevalence, abundance, and species richness of helminth parasites. -
Unveiling the Geographic Distribution of Boana Pugnax (Schmidt, 1857) (Anura, Hylidae) in Venezuela: New State Records, Range Extension, and Potential Distribution
13 5 671 Escalona et al NOTES ON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION Check List 13 (5): 671–681 https://doi.org/10.15560/13.5.671 Unveiling the geographic distribution of Boana pugnax (Schmidt, 1857) (Anura, Hylidae) in Venezuela: new state records, range extension, and potential distribution Moisés Escalona,1, 2 David A. Prieto-Torres,3, 4 Fernando J. M. Rojas-Runjaic1, 5 1 Laboratório de Sistemática de Vertebrados, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 90619-900, Brasil. 2 Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Los Andes, Mérida 5101, Venezuela. 3 Eje BioCiencias, Centro de Modelado Científico de la Universidad del Zulia (CMC), Facultad Experimental de Ciencias, Universidad del Zulia, Maracaibo, Venezuela. 4 Red de Biología Evolutiva, Laboratorio de Bioclimatología, Instituto de Ecología, A.C., carretera antigua a Coatepec No. 351, El Haya, 91070 Xalapa, Veracruz, México. 5 Museo de Historia Natural La Salle, Fundación La Salle de Ciencias Naturales, Apartado Postal 1930, Caracas 1010-A, Venezuela. Corresponding author: Moisés Escalona, [email protected] Abstract Boana pugnax is a treefrog inhabiting open lowlands from southern Central America and northwestern South America. Its geographic distribution in Venezuela is poorly understood due, in part, its morphological similarity with B. xero- phylla (with which is frequently confused) and the few localities documented. In order to increase the knowledge of the distribution of B. pugnax in the country, we examined the specimens of B. pugnax and B. xerophylla deposited in 4 Venezuelan museums, compiled the locality records of B. pugnax, and generated a model of potential distribution for species. -
North Central Waterwatch Frogs Field Guide
North Central Waterwatch Frogs Field Guide “This guide is an excellent publication. It strikes just the right balance, providing enough information in a format that is easy to use for identifying our locally occurring frogs, while still being attractive and interesting to read by people of all ages.” Rodney Orr, Bendigo Field Naturalists Club Inc. 1 The North Central CMA Region Swan Hill River Murray Kerang Cohuna Quambatook Loddon River Pyramid Hill Wycheproof Boort Loddon/Campaspe Echuca Watchem Irrigation Area Charlton Mitiamo Donald Rochester Avoca River Serpentine Avoca/Avon-Richardson Wedderburn Elmore Catchment Area Richardson River Bridgewater Campaspe River St Arnaud Marnoo Huntly Bendigo Avon River Bealiba Dunolly Loddon/Campaspe Dryland Area Heathcote Maryborough Castlemaine Avoca Loddon River Kyneton Lexton Clunes Daylesford Woodend Creswick Acknowledgement Of Country The North Central Catchment Management Authority (CMA) acknowledges Aboriginal Traditional Owners within the North Central CMA region, their rich culture and their spiritual connection to Country. We also recognise and acknowledge the contribution and interests of Aboriginal people and organisations in the management of land and natural resources. Acknowledgements North Central Waterwatch would like to acknowledge the contribution and support from the following organisations and individuals during the development of this publication: Britt Gregory from North Central CMA for her invaluable efforts in the production of this document, Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority for allowing use of their draft field guide, Lydia Fucsko, Adrian Martins, David Kleinert, Leigh Mitchell, Peter Robertson and Nick Layne for use of their wonderful photos and Mallee Catchment Management Authority for their design support and a special thanks to Ray Draper for his support and guidance in the development of the Frogs Field Guide 2012. -
A Preliminary Risk Assessment of Cane Toads in Kakadu National Park Scientist Report 164, Supervising Scientist, Darwin NT
supervising scientist 164 report A preliminary risk assessment of cane toads in Kakadu National Park RA van Dam, DJ Walden & GW Begg supervising scientist national centre for tropical wetland research This report has been prepared by staff of the Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist (eriss) as part of our commitment to the National Centre for Tropical Wetland Research Rick A van Dam Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, Locked Bag 2, Jabiru NT 0886, Australia (Present address: Sinclair Knight Merz, 100 Christie St, St Leonards NSW 2065, Australia) David J Walden Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801, Australia George W Begg Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801, Australia This report should be cited as follows: van Dam RA, Walden DJ & Begg GW 2002 A preliminary risk assessment of cane toads in Kakadu National Park Scientist Report 164, Supervising Scientist, Darwin NT The Supervising Scientist is part of Environment Australia, the environmental program of the Commonwealth Department of Environment and Heritage © Commonwealth of Australia 2002 Supervising Scientist Environment Australia GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801 Australia ISSN 1325-1554 ISBN 0 642 24370 0 This work is copyright Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Supervising Scientist Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction -
Catalogue of Protozoan Parasites Recorded in Australia Peter J. O
1 CATALOGUE OF PROTOZOAN PARASITES RECORDED IN AUSTRALIA PETER J. O’DONOGHUE & ROBERT D. ADLARD O’Donoghue, P.J. & Adlard, R.D. 2000 02 29: Catalogue of protozoan parasites recorded in Australia. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 45(1):1-164. Brisbane. ISSN 0079-8835. Published reports of protozoan species from Australian animals have been compiled into a host- parasite checklist, a parasite-host checklist and a cross-referenced bibliography. Protozoa listed include parasites, commensals and symbionts but free-living species have been excluded. Over 590 protozoan species are listed including amoebae, flagellates, ciliates and ‘sporozoa’ (the latter comprising apicomplexans, microsporans, myxozoans, haplosporidians and paramyxeans). Organisms are recorded in association with some 520 hosts including mammals, marsupials, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish and invertebrates. Information has been abstracted from over 1,270 scientific publications predating 1999 and all records include taxonomic authorities, synonyms, common names, sites of infection within hosts and geographic locations. Protozoa, parasite checklist, host checklist, bibliography, Australia. Peter J. O’Donoghue, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia 4072, Australia; Robert D. Adlard, Protozoa Section, Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane 4101, Australia; 31 January 2000. CONTENTS the literature for reports relevant to contemporary studies. Such problems could be avoided if all previous HOST-PARASITE CHECKLIST 5 records were consolidated into a single database. Most Mammals 5 researchers currently avail themselves of various Reptiles 21 electronic database and abstracting services but none Amphibians 26 include literature published earlier than 1985 and not all Birds 34 journal titles are covered in their databases. Fish 44 Invertebrates 54 Several catalogues of parasites in Australian PARASITE-HOST CHECKLIST 63 hosts have previously been published. -
Predation by Introduced Cats Felis Catus on Australian Frogs: Compilation of Species Records and Estimation of Numbers Killed
Predation by introduced cats Felis catus on Australian frogs: compilation of species records and estimation of numbers killed J. C. Z. WoinarskiA,M, S. M. LeggeB,C, L. A. WoolleyA,L, R. PalmerD, C. R. DickmanE, J. AugusteynF, T. S. DohertyG, G. EdwardsH, H. GeyleA, H. McGregorI, J. RileyJ, J. TurpinK and B. P. MurphyA ANESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia. BNESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Research, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia. CFenner School of the Environment and Society, Linnaeus Way, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2602, Australia. DWestern Australian Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Bentley, WA 6983, Australia. ENESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, Desert Ecology Research Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. FQueensland Parks and Wildlife Service, Red Hill, Qld 4701, Australia. GCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences (Burwood campus), Deakin University, Geelong, Vic. 3216, Australia. HNorthern Territory Department of Land Resource Management, PO Box 1120, Alice Springs, NT 0871, Australia. INESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, School of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia. JSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TQ, United Kingdom. KDepartment of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, 49 Kew Street, Welshpool, WA 6106, Australia. LPresent address: WWF-Australia, 3 Broome Lotteries House, Cable Beach Road, Broome, WA 6276, Australia. MCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Table S1. Data sources used in compilation of cat predation on frogs. -
ARAZPA YOTF Infopack.Pdf
ARAZPA 2008 Year of the Frog Campaign Information pack ARAZPA 2008 Year of the Frog Campaign Printing: The ARAZPA 2008 Year of the Frog Campaign pack was generously supported by Madman Printing Phone: +61 3 9244 0100 Email: [email protected] Front cover design: Patrick Crawley, www.creepycrawleycartoons.com Mobile: 0401 316 827 Email: [email protected] Front cover photo: Pseudophryne pengilleyi, Northern Corroboree Frog. Photo courtesy of Lydia Fucsko. Printed on 100% recycled stock 2 ARAZPA 2008 Year of the Frog Campaign Contents Foreword.........................................................................................................................................5 Foreword part II ………………………………………………………………………………………… ...6 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................9 Section 1: Why A Campaign?....................................................................................................11 The Connection Between Man and Nature........................................................................11 Man’s Effect on Nature ......................................................................................................11 Frogs Matter ......................................................................................................................11 The Problem ......................................................................................................................12 The Reason -
A List of the Vertebrates of South Australia
VERTEBRATES OF SOUTH AUSTRALI,A ?s BDITBD BY !líi C.H.S. WATTS ie4 l i ` er'P^{q L' C" /PA', o s VERTEBRATES OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA EDITED BY C.H.S. WATTS South Australian Museum Prepared by the curators of vertebrates at the South Australian Museum and officers of the Information Systems Branch, Department of Environment and Planning Published by the Biological Survey Coordinating Committee and the Department of Environment and Planning, South Australia. Adelaide 1990 ® Department of Environment and Planning South Australia 1990 First edition (edited by H.J. Aslin) published 1985 Second edition (edited by C.H.S. Watts) published 1990 Design and layout by Technical Services Division Department of Environment and Planning ISBN 0 7308 0482 8 Index no. 11821 Introduction 1 Environmental Provinces of South Australia 5 Mammals 7 Birds 21 Reptiles & Amphibians 55 Freshwater Fishes 69 Index of Common Names 79 Index of Generic Names 81 SYMBOLS USED Ex =Extinct 2 E = Endangered 2 V = Vulnerable 2 R= Rare 2 I = Indeterminate Status 3 C= Common (used in Mammal and Bird section only) 3 U= Uncommon (used in Mammal and Bird section only) 3 O= Occasional (used in Mammal and Bird section only) 3 * Introduced Species + = Only nominate subspecies in South Australia ()= No specimen in S.A. Museum collections # = Only recorded from artificial habitats (p.69) (Fishes only) ? = Questionable Record 1 This list includes all species of vertebrate animals reliably reported to have occurred in South Australia as free- living forms during the period of European settlement of the State. It has been prepared from a variety of published sources, (the major ones of which are cited in the various sections), and from the specimen collections held by the South Australian Museum, and, in some cases, other Australian museums. -
Indicus Biological Consultants
Indicus Biological Consultants Darwin City Waterfront (Darwin Wharf) Redevelopment Terrestrial fauna assessment December 2003 James Smith Ronald Firth This document is and shall remain the property of Indicus Biological Consultants. The document may only be used for the purposes for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the Terms of the Engagement for the commission. Unauthorised use of this document in any form whatsoever is prohibited. 29 Aralia Street, Nightcliff phone: (08) 8411 0350 email: [email protected] Contents www.indicusbc.netfirms.com Terrestrial Fauna Assessment Darwin City Waterfront Redevelopment December 2003 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................................................................3 SURVEY METHODS ................................................................................................................................................................3 Bird counts ........................................................................................................................................................................3 Active Searches .................................................................................................................................................................3 Incidental records ..............................................................................................................................................................4 Bat -
A LIST of the VERTEBRATES of SOUTH AUSTRALIA
A LIST of the VERTEBRATES of SOUTH AUSTRALIA updates. for Edition 4th Editors See A.C. Robinson K.D. Casperson Biological Survey and Research Heritage and Biodiversity Division Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia M.N. Hutchinson South Australian Museum Department of Transport, Urban Planning and the Arts, South Australia 2000 i EDITORS A.C. Robinson & K.D. Casperson, Biological Survey and Research, Biological Survey and Research, Heritage and Biodiversity Division, Department for Environment and Heritage. G.P.O. Box 1047, Adelaide, SA, 5001 M.N. Hutchinson, Curator of Reptiles and Amphibians South Australian Museum, Department of Transport, Urban Planning and the Arts. GPO Box 234, Adelaide, SA 5001updates. for CARTOGRAPHY AND DESIGN Biological Survey & Research, Heritage and Biodiversity Division, Department for Environment and Heritage Edition Department for Environment and Heritage 2000 4thISBN 0 7308 5890 1 First Edition (edited by H.J. Aslin) published 1985 Second Edition (edited by C.H.S. Watts) published 1990 Third Edition (edited bySee A.C. Robinson, M.N. Hutchinson, and K.D. Casperson) published 2000 Cover Photograph: Clockwise:- Western Pygmy Possum, Cercartetus concinnus (Photo A. Robinson), Smooth Knob-tailed Gecko, Nephrurus levis (Photo A. Robinson), Painted Frog, Neobatrachus pictus (Photo A. Robinson), Desert Goby, Chlamydogobius eremius (Photo N. Armstrong),Osprey, Pandion haliaetus (Photo A. Robinson) ii _______________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS -
PREDATORY INTERACTION BETWEEN TWO ANURAN SPECIES with Thamnodynastes Chaquensis (COLUBRIDAE) in the BRAZILIAN CERRADO Interacci
Facultad de Ciencias ACTA BIOLÓGICA COLOMBIANA Departamento de Biología http://www.revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/actabiol Sede Bogotá NOTA BREVE / SHOR NOTE ZOOLOGÍA PREDATORY INTERACTION BETWEEN TWO ANURAN SPECIES WITH Thamnodynastes chaquensis (COLUBRIDAE) IN THE BRAZILIAN CERRADO Interacción depredatoria entre dos especies de anura con Thamnodynastes chaquensis (Colubridae) en el Cerrado brasileño Fernanda DIAS-SILVA1 *, Rodney Murillo Peixoto COUTO2 , Maiara Cabrera MIGUEL2 , Guilherme Brad ADAMS3 , Daniel BÜHLER3 , Elvis Almeida PEREIRA4,5,6 1Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biológicas (Biodiversidade Neotropical), Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Pasteur, 296, 22290–240, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. 2Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, 79070–900, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil. 3Biota Soluções Ambientais Ltda, Rua Lindolfo Collor, 439, sala 301, Centro, CEP 93010–080, São Leopoldo, RS, Brazil. 4Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia animal, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Laboratório de Herpetologia, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, 23890-000, Seropédica, RJ, Brazil 5Mapinguari – Laboratório de Biogeografia e Sistemática de Anfíbios e Répteis, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, 79002- 970, Campo Grande, MS, Brasil. 6Technische Universität Braunschweig, Zoological Institute, Mendelssohnstrasse 4, 38106, Braunschweig, Germany. *For correspondence: [email protected] Received: 13th February 2020, Returned for revision: 4th June 2020, Accepted: 20th July 2020. Associate Editor: Martha Ramírez Pinilla. Citation/Citar este artículo como: Dias-Silva, F, Couto RMP, Miguel MC, Adams GB, Bühler D, Pereira EA. Interacción depredatoria entre dos especies de anura con Thamnodynastes chaquensis (Colubridae) en el Cerrado brasileño. Acta Biol Colomb. 2021;26(2):273-277. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/ abc.v26n2.85132 ABSTRACT Although predatory events are uncommon to be recorded in nature, these data are important tools for understanding prey-predator interaction of the involved species. -
Species Accounts -- Animals
SoCal Biodiversity - Animals Arboreal Salamander Amphibian SoCal Biodiversity - Animals Arboreal Salamander Amphibian Arroyo Toad Arboreal Salamander Arboreal Salamander (Aneides lugubris) Management Status Heritage Status Rank: G5N5S4 Federal: None State: None Other: Species identified as a local viability concern (Stephenson and Calcarone 1999) General Distribution Arboreal salamander occurs in yellow pine and black oak forests in the Sierra Nevada, and in coastal live oak woodlands from northern California to Baja California. The species also occurs in the foothills of the Sierra Nevada from El Dorado County to Madera County and on South Farallon, Santa Catalina, Los Coronados, and Ano Nuevo islands off the coast of California (Petranka 1998, Stebbins 1951, Stebbins 1985). Arboreal salamander occurs from sea level to an elevation of about 5,000 feet (1,520 meters) (Stebbins 1985). Distribution in the Planning Area Arboreal salamander reportedly occurs in the foothills and lower elevations of every mountain range on National Forest System lands, although it is seldom seen (Stephenson and Calcarone 1999). There are records of occurrence for this species on the Los Padres National Forest near upper San Juan Creek and on the Cleveland National Forest near Soldier Creek (USDA Forest Service file information), San Gabriel foothills east to Day Canyon, and in the San Jacinto Mountains (Goodward pers. comm.). Systematics There are four species in the genus Aneides in the western United States, three of which occur in California (Stebbins 1985). Of these three, only arboreal salamander ranges into southern California. Most of the Aneides salamanders climb (Stebbins 1985). Arboreal salamander consists of two chromosomally differentiated groups that intergrade in south and east-central Mendocino County, about 56 miles (90 kilometers) north of the San Francisco Bay region (Sessions and Kezer 1987).