Adopted by the Board of Allegany County Commissioners

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Adopted by the Board of Allegany County Commissioners ii 2011 Water and Sewerage Plan Adopted by the Board of Allegany County Commissioners October 27 2011 2011 Water and Sewerage Plan iii Adopted by the Board of Allegany County Commissioners Allegany County Water and Sewerage Plan Adopted October 27, 2011 Allegany County Board of County Commissioners Michael W. McKay Creade V. Brodie, Jr. William R. Valentine Planning and Zoning Commission of Allegany County E. William DuVall, II, Chairman Dwight W. Perrin, Vice-Chairman William R. Davis, Jr. Rodger L. Uphold Edward T. Robinette, Sr. Kimberly R. Heavner Donna Elaine Thomas Stephen K. MacGray Wesley W. McKee, Esq., Legal Counsel Allegany County Water and Sewerage Plan Committee Elizabeth E. Stahlman, GIS Manager, Department of Community Services Daniel S. DeWitt, E.I.T, Engineer I, Department of Public Works James L. Webber, P.E., Engineer III, Department of Public Works-Utilities Division Mark W. Yoder, P.E., Chief, Department of Public Works-Utilities Division Philip R. Hager, Planning Coordinator, Planning Division Cover design by Siera Wigfield, Planning/Transit Divisions October 27 2011 iv 2011 Water and Sewerage Plan Adopted by the Board of Allegany County Commissioners October 27 2011 2011 Water and Sewerage Plan v Adopted by the Board of Allegany County Commissioners Certification of Incorporation of Subsidiary Plans This is to certify that Allegany County Government made all reasonable efforts to include information regarding all public and private water and sewer systems present within the County. The Water and Sewerage Plan committee successfully made contact and received information from the following organizations: Allegany County Health Department City of Cumberland City of Frostburg Town of Lonaconing Town of Westernport LaVale Sanitary Commission Maryland Water Service Maryland Environmental Service Rawlings Heights Water Company Rawlings Improvement Association Inc. Midlothian Water Company Luke Paper Company Upper Potomac River Commission Broadwater Addition Water Company Little Orleans Campground City of Keyser, West Virginia Bald Eagle Boys Camp The Water and Sewerage Plan Committee sincerely appreciates the participation and cooperation of these agencies. The Committee incorporated data, plans, and revisions provided by these organizations. For the operators of water and sewerage systems that are not listed above, contact information is unknown or no response was received. _________________________________ David A. Eberly County Administrator October 27 2011 vi 2011 Water and Sewerage Plan Adopted by the Board of Allegany County Commissioners October 27 2011 2011 Water and Sewerage Plan vii Adopted by the Board of Allegany County Commissioners Engineer’s Certification This is to certify that sections of the 2011 Water and Sewerage Plan covering aspects of water and sewerage have been prepared and/or reviewed for adequacy to meet the defined needs. _________________________________ Paul F. Kahl, P.E. Director of Public Works October 27 2011 viii 2011 Water and Sewerage Plan Adopted by the Board of Allegany County Commissioners October 27 2011 2011 Water and Sewerage Plan ix Adopted by the Board of Allegany County Commissioners Resolution - County Commissioners October 27 2011 x 2011 Water and Sewerage Plan Adopted by the Board of Allegany County Commissioners Letter of Approval from Maryland Department of the Environment (to be inserted within six months following adoption of Plan) October 27 2011 2011 Allegany County Water & Sewerage Plan | x- [Page 1/7] 2011 Allegany County Water & Sewerage Plan | x- [Page 2/7] 2011 Allegany County Water & Sewerage Plan | x- [Page 3/7] 2011 Allegany County Water & Sewerage Plan | x- [Page 4/7] 2011 Allegany County Water & Sewerage Plan | x- [Page 5/7] 2011 Allegany County Water & Sewerage Plan | x- [Page 6/7] 2011 Allegany County Water & Sewerage Plan | x- [Page 7/7] 2011 Water and Sewerage Plan xi Adopted by the Board of Allegany County Commissioners Table of Contents Definitions ..................................................................................................................................................... xvii Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter I ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 Section 1.01 Consistency with County Comprehensive Planning ................................................................ 3 Section 1.02 County Government Organization .........................................................................................4 Chapter II Background Information ............................................................................................................. 5 Section 2.01 Historic Context ..................................................................................................................... 5 Section 2.02 Physical Features ...................................................................................................................8 2.02.01 Topography .....................................................................................................................8 2.02.02 Soil Drainage Characteristics ...........................................................................................9 2.02.03 Aquifers ......................................................................................................................... 10 2.02.04 Groundwater Patterns ................................................................................................... 11 2.02.05 Surface water patterns .................................................................................................. 12 2.02.06 Water Quality Criteria .................................................................................................... 15 Section 2.03 Population ........................................................................................................................... 21 2.03.01 Present Population Distribution ..................................................................................... 21 2.03.02 Future Demand Projections ........................................................................................... 22 Section 2.04 Land Use .............................................................................................................................. 24 2.04.01 Existing Land Use .......................................................................................................... 24 2.04.02 Zoning ...........................................................................................................................26 2.04.03 Future Land Use ............................................................................................................. 28 2.04.04 Institutions and Facilities ...............................................................................................29 Chapter III Water Systems .......................................................................................................................... 31 Section 3.01 Community Water Supply Systems ...................................................................................... 33 3.01.01 Evitts Creek System ....................................................................................................... 33 3.01.01.01 City of Cumberland Service Area ............................................................................... 34 3.01.01.02 Bowling Green Service Area ...................................................................................... 36 3.01.01.03 Bowmans Addition Service Area ............................................................................... 38 3.01.01.04 Cresaptown Service Area .......................................................................................... 40 3.01.01.05 Corriganville/Ellerslie Service Area ............................................................................ 42 3.01.01.06 Barton Business Park Service Area ............................................................................ 44 3.01.01.07 Oldtown Road Service Area ...................................................................................... 46 3.01.01.08 Mexico Farms Service Area ....................................................................................... 48 3.01.01.09 Pinto Service Area ..................................................................................................... 50 3.01.01.10 LaVale Service Area .................................................................................................. 52 3.01.02 Frostburg System .......................................................................................................... 54 3.01.02.01 City of Frostburg Service Area ................................................................................... 54 3.01.02.02 Consol Service Area .................................................................................................. 56 3.01.02.03 Carlos/Shaft/Klondike Service Area ........................................................................... 58 October 27 2011 xii 2011 Water and Sewerage Plan Adopted by the Board of Allegany County Commissioners 3.01.02.04 Grahamtown Service Area ........................................................................................60 3.01.02.05 Hoffman Service
Recommended publications
  • Survey of Acidic and Episodically Acidic Streams in Western Maryland
    SURVEYSURVEY OF OF ACIDIC ACIDIC AND AND EPISODICALLYEPISODICALLY ACIDIC ACIDIC STREAMS STREAMS ININ WESTERN WESTERN MARYLAND MARYLAND CHESAPEAKEBAY AND WATERSHED PROGRAMS MONITORING AND NON-TIDAL ASSESSMENT CBWP-MANTA- EA-01-1 Parris N. Glendening Kathleen Kennedy Townsend Governor Lt. Governor A message to Maryland’s citizens The Maryland Department of Natural Resources (DNR) seeks to preserve, protect and enhance the living resources of the state. Working in partnership with the citizens of Maryland, this worthwhile goal will become a reality. This publication provides information that will increase your understanding of how DNR strives to reach that goal through its many diverse programs. J. Charles Fox Karen M. White Secretary Deputy Secretary Maryland Department of Natural Resources Tawes State Office Building 580 Taylor Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21401 Toll free in Maryland: 1-(877) 620 8DNR x8611 Out of state call: 410-260-8611 www.dnr.state.md.us The facilities and services of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources are available to all without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, age, national origin, physical or mental disability. This document is available in alternative format upon request from a qualified individual with a disability. Publication date: September, 2001 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Survey of Acidic and Episodically Acidic Streams in Western Maryland Prepared for: Paul Kazyak Maryland Department of Natural Resources Monitoring and Non-Tidal Assessment Division Resource Assessment Service Annapolis, MD 21401 Prepared by: Matthew J. Kline Raymond P. Morgan II University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science Appalachian Laboratory Frostburg, MD 21532 Report Completed January 2000 FOREWORD This report, Survey of Acidic and Episodically Acidic Streams in Western Maryland, is submitted to Paul Kazyak, Monitoring and Non-Tidal Assessment Division, Maryland Department of Natural Resources (DNR) in partial fulfillment of contract #: MA98-002-003 to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-Symposium-Booklet.Pdf
    0 TABLE OF CONTENTS The Abstracts ................................................................................................................................................ 2 COLLEGE OF BUSINESS Department of Management ....................................................................................................................... 3 Department of Marketing and Finance ........................................................................................................ 5 COLLEGE OF EDUCATION Department of Kinesiology and Recreation ................................................................................................. 6 COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS AND SCIENCES Department of Biology ............................................................................................................................... 10 Department of Chemistry ........................................................................................................................... 25 Department of Communication ................................................................................................................. 28 Department of Computer Science and Information Technologies ............................................................ 29 Department of English and Foreign Languages .......................................................................................... 31 Department of Geography ......................................................................................................................... 39 Department
    [Show full text]
  • MARKET AREA ANALYSIS* Cumberland Overview
    MARKET AREA ANALYSIS* Cumberland Overview Cumberland, officially “the City of Cumberland,” is a western gateway city and seat of Allegany County, Maryland, and the primary city of the Cumberland, MD-WV Metropolitan Statistical Area. At the 2010 census, the city had a population of 20,859 and the metropolitan area had a population of 103,299. Cumberland is a regional business and commercial center for Western Maryland and the Potomac Highlands of West Virginia. It is equidistant from Baltimore, Washington D.C. and Pittsburg, approximately 130 miles from each city. ______________ *The majority of the material, charts, and tables contained in this section was supplied by the Cities of Frostburg and Cumberland, Maryland, or was supplied by numerous pertinent websites and interviews with key government and industry leaders. Hampton Inn & Suites • Cumberland, Maryland • Feasibility Study Page C-1 History Cumberland is named after the son of King George II, Prince William, the Duke of Cumberland. It is built on the site of the old Fort Cumberland, the starting point for British General Edward Braddock's ill-fated attack on the French stronghold of Fort Duquesne (located on the site of present-day Pittsburgh) during the French and Indian War. Cumberland was also an outpost of Colonel George Washington during the French and Indian War and his first military headquarters was built here. Washington later returned to Cumberland as President in 1794 to review troops that had been assembled to thwart the Whiskey Rebellion. Cumberland was a key road, railroad and canal junction during the 19th century and at one time the second largest city in Maryland (second to the port city of Baltimore — hence its nickname "The Queen City").
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Long Range Transportation Plan Cumberland Area
    Prepared for: Cumberland Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Prepared by: with Crossroads Transportation Financial Assistance Provided By: February 26, 2016 MPO Adopted: March 24, 2016 Federal Concurrence: Table of Contents Chapter 1: The Process, Purpose, and the Plan ..................................................................................................................... 1‐2 1.1 What is Transportation Planning? ....................................................................................................................................... 1‐2 1.2 What Is the Role of an MPO in Regional Transportation Planning? .................................................................................... 1‐2 1.3 Why are MPOs required? .................................................................................................................................................... 1‐3 1.4 What is the Cumberland Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO)? ................................................................. 1‐4 1.5 Where is the CAMPO Region? ............................................................................................................................................. 1‐4 1.6 What is CAMPO’s Organizational Structure? ...................................................................................................................... 1‐6 1.7 What is Plan 2040? .............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • COAL MEASURES OP MARYLAND1 (Bead
    BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA VOL. 30, PP. 567-596, PL8. 14-15 DECEMBER 31, 1919 PROCEEDINGS OF THE PALEONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY COAL MEASURES OP MARYLAND1 BY CHARLES K. SWARTZ, W. ARMSTRONG PRICE, AND HARVEY BASSLER (Bead before the Paleontological Society, December 28, 1918) CONTENTS Page Introduction ................................................................................................................. 567 Area ........................................................................................................................ 567 Earlier investigation ......................., ................................................................ 569 Present investigation .................................... .................................................. 570 Part I. Stratigraphy of the Coal Measures, by Charles K. Swartz............... 570 In general ............................................................................................................ 570 Pottsville formation .......................................................................................... 571 Character and thickness .......................................................................... 571 Members ...... ................................................................................................. 571 Faunas ........................................................................................................... 571 Allegheny formation .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Success Stories IV Left
    MITIGATION SUCCESS STORIES INTHE UNITED STATES Edition 4 • January , 2002 Mitigation Success Stories / i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The spirit of cooperation among the individuals, agencies and organizations who contributed to this publication serves as an example of the inter-disciplinary approach of multi-objective management which is so essential to the success of hazard mitigation. Special appreciation is extended to the driv- ing force behind this effort, Association of State Floodplain Managers’ Flood Mitigation Committee Chairs Mark Matulik (Colorado) and Bob Boteler (Mississippi). The following were helpful in the development and production: The Contributing Authors FEMA, Federal lnsurance and Mitigation Administration ECO Planning, Inc. Synergy Ink Ltd This publication is available free on the ASFPM website at www.floods.org Reproduction with credit is permitted. The opinions contained in this volume are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the funding or sponsoring organizations. Use of trademarks or brand names in these stories is not intended as an endorsement of the products. Association of State Floodplain Managers, Inc. 2809 Fish Hatchery Road, Suite 204 Madison WI 53713 (608) 274-0123 • Fax (608) 274-0696 Email: [email protected] Website: www.floods.org Edition 4 • January 2002 ii / Mitigation Success Stories INTRODUCTION MITIGATION SUCCESS STORIES A joint project of the Association of State Floodplain Managers and the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Mitigation effectively lessens the potential for future flood damages by breaking the damage-repair-damage cycle. For over two decades, mitigation activities have been implemented across the country to save lives, reduce property damage and lessen the need for recovery funding.
    [Show full text]
  • Allegany County Water Resources Element, As an Addendum to the 2002 Allegany County Comprehensive Plan Update
    ALLEGANY COUNTY, MD WATER RESOURCES ELEMENT OCTOBER 2010 AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2002 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Acknowledgements The Planning & Zoning Commission of Allegany County has developed the 2010 Allegany County Water Resources Element, as an addendum to the 2002 Allegany County Comprehensive Plan Update. Allegany County Commissioners at Allegany County Commissioners at the time of Preparation: the time of Adoption: James J. Stakem, President Michael McKay Dale R. Lewis Creade Brodie Robert M. Hutcheson WilliamValentine Allegany County Planning & Zoning Commission Members E. William Duvall, II, Chairman Dwight W. Perrin, Vice-Chairman William R. Davis, Jr. Rodger L. Uphold Edward T. Robinette, Sr. Kimberly R. Heavner N. Lois Crossland Steve K. MacGray Wesley W. McKee, Esquire, Legal Counsel Allegany County Planning Services Staff Philip Hager, Executive Director Amy Baker, Associate Planner Linda Simpson, Office Associate Contributing Staff Elizabeth Stahlman, GIS Manager Greg Hildreth, GIS Specialist Mark W. Yoder, Utilities Division Chief, P.E. James L. Webber, Engineer III, Public Works, P.E. Dan DeWitt, Public Works, E.I.T. Brent T. Walker, Planning Technician Jennifer Townsend, Planning Intern Prepared by: S&S Planning and Design, LLC 76 Baltimore Street Cumberland, MD 21502 Allegany County Water Resources Element October 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Water Resources ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • How Baltimore Became the New York of the South: European Immigration Between 1867-1914 and the Development of Ethnic Neighborhoods Around the Port of Baltimore
    HOW BALTIMORE BECAME THE NEW YORK OF THE SOUTH: EUROPEAN IMMIGRATION BETWEEN 1867-1914 AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF ETHNIC NEIGHBORHOODS AROUND THE PORT OF BALTIMORE A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of The School of Continuing Studies and of The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Liberal Studies By Ron Cassie Georgetown University Washington, D.C. April 15, 2016 HOW BALTIMORE BECAME THE NEW YORK OF THE SOUTH: EUROPEAN IMMIGRATION BETWEEN 1867-1914 AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF ETHNIC NEIGHBORHOODS AROUND THE PORT OF BALTIMORE Ron Cassie, MA Mentor: Charles Edward Yonkers, JD ABSTRACT Located 40 miles south of the Mason-Dixon Line, Baltimore was the fourth – largest city in the U.S. and the largest in the South before the Civil War, serving as the economic hub of the Mid-Atlantic region. Although Baltimore was always home to a significant free black population, the city was centered in a largely slave-holding state. Although Maryland choose neither Union or Confederate sides during the Civil War before President Abraham Lincoln sent federal troops into Baltimore, the city’s port business in the middle of the 19th century focused on the rural exports of tobacco, cotton, grain, and flour; ship building; and the importation of sugar. Politically, economically, and culturally, Maryland was, at the time, a Southern state full of plantations from the Eastern Shore across the state’s central area around Baltimore. The city, however, was more a blend of white Southern and white Northern influences, a marginalized African-American citizenry, a significant group of German immigrants, and more recent Irish arrivals at the start of the Civil War.
    [Show full text]
  • Georges Creek Watershed Restoration Action Strategies Plan
    GG EE OO RR GG EE SS CC RR EE EE KK Watershed Restoration Action Strategies P L A N June 2002 IDEAS FOR TODAY AND TOMORROW. Georges Creek Watershed Restoration Action Strategies Plan This plan was developed through a cooperative effort of federal, state, and local agencies, non-profit organizations, and the citizens of the Georges Creek Watershed. This project has been funded in part by a Section 319 Clean Water Act Grant from the U. S. EP A. Although, the EP A funds this Program, the contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the opinion or position of the EPA. Special thanks are extended to the members of the Georges Creek Watershed Association who donated their time and ideas to this planning effort. Abstract The Georges Creek Watershed Restoration Action Strategies Plan has been developed by a steering committee comprised of representatives from both the public and private sector. This plan is intended to serve local decision-makers as a guide to planning, developing, and implementing comprehensive meaningful restoration projects that are a part of a larger watershed-wide approach. Listed within this plan are twelve problem categories divided into two large groups; water quality, and water quantity. Each problem category contains a brief problem description, associated data, and action examples. In the last section of this plan “What Steps Do We Take To Get There?” the Action Plan can be found. This Action Plan details next step items for the community to engage in. This section of the plan provided action items that the community can engage in making their vision of the Georges Creek Watershed a reality.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This Form Is for Use in Nominating Or Requesting Determinations for Individual Properties and Districts
    inev lu-au) AL-IV-A-164 United States Department of th* .enor National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in Hew to Complete the National Register > of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking V in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" fa "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a) Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Greene Street Historic District other names/site number 2. Location street & number Greene Street between Spruce Alley & Riverside Pknot for publication N/A city or town Cumberland vicinity N/A 1stat e Maryland code MP county Allegany code 001 zip code 21502 t 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this A nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register1'of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property jC meets does not meet the National Register Criteria I recommend that this property be considered significant nationally statewide Y locally.
    [Show full text]
  • AL-VI-C-118 Shaw Mansion, (Zion Christian Educational Center)
    AL-VI-C-118 Shaw Mansion, (Zion Christian Educational Center) Architectural Survey File This is the architectural survey file for this MIHP record. The survey file is organized reverse- chronological (that is, with the latest material on top). It contains all MIHP inventory forms, National Register nomination forms, determinations of eligibility (DOE) forms, and accompanying documentation such as photographs and maps. Users should be aware that additional undigitized material about this property may be found in on-site architectural reports, copies of HABS/HAER or other documentation, drawings, and the “vertical files” at the MHT Library in Crownsville. The vertical files may include newspaper clippings, field notes, draft versions of forms and architectural reports, photographs, maps, and drawings. Researchers who need a thorough understanding of this property should plan to visit the MHT Library as part of their research project; look at the MHT web site (mht.maryland.gov) for details about how to make an appointment. All material is property of the Maryland Historical Trust. Last Updated: 12-11-2003 SHAW MANS ION AL-VI-C-118 Route 36, Barton 1872 The Shaw Mansion was constructed in 1872 by Andrew Bruce Shaw. The house originally contained twelve rooms and had steam heat, running water and electric light from Shaw's own lighting plant. Architecturally, the house is a very fash- ionable example of the Italianate style. FHR4-300 (11-781 AL-VI-C-118 United States Departr.1cnt of the ;;lterior t:eritage Conservation and R::creation !;ervice For HC~S l.!Se only National Register of Historic Places received 'da!e Entered Inventory-Nomination Form ! l-\~·~·-~- ..
    [Show full text]
  • Allegany County Recei
    ,- -W.i \\ \( i c4 ALLEGANY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SER VICES 701 Kelly Road Cumberland, MD 2 1502 301-777-2 199 FAX 301 -722-2467 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Michael W. McKay, President David A. Eberly, County Administrator Creade V. Brodie, Jr. William R. Valentine 19 August 201 1 The Hon. Beverly K. Swaim-Staley, Secretary RECEI Maryland Department of Transportation 7201 Corporate Center Drive AUG 2 3 2071 Hanover, MD 21076 SECRETARY'S 13 FFICE DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION Dear Madam Secretary, A previous letter from the Board of Allegany County Commissioners (dated 8 August 201 1) identified transportation priorities for the coming year for Allegany County, the City of Frostburg, the City of Cumberland and the Towns of Lonaconing and Westernport. These priorities were enumerated in an attachment to the aforementioned cover letter. In the process of copying and collating these pages in preparation for mailing, a page containing some of the priorities for the City of Frostburg was unintentionally omitted. Please accept our apologies for this error. A new listing including all of the priorities for all of the previously identified jurisdictions is appended to this letter. I would be happy to address any questions or provide clarification on this or the previous submittal. I can be reached via telephone at 301/876-9555 or phil.hager@,alleonet.org- via email. Sincere1Y1 Philip R. Hager, Executive Director Planning & Zoning Commission Allegany County Transportation Priorities for 2012 CTP August 2011 1. Commitment to initiation, completion and full-funding of Maryland’s share of the Tier I1 stage of the National Highway System (”S) Corridor along U.S.
    [Show full text]