2006 Annual Report National Ffa Foundation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2006 Annual Report National Ffa Foundation Acknowledgements: Annual Report Design: Contact: Greg Nickerson, President Phone: (262) 784-7200 Address: 13845 Bishop’s Drive, Brookfield, WI 53005 www.baderrutter.com Annual Report Printing: Contact: Scott Mortimer, Publisher Phone: (800) 678-2869 Address: 1716 Locust St. LS-235, Des Moines, IA 50309 www.agriculture.com www.livingthecountrylife.com 2006 ANNUAL REPORT NATIONAL FFA FOUNDATION P.O. Box 68960, 6060 FFA Drive Indianapolis, IN 46268-0960 Phone: (317) 802-6060 • Fax: (317) 802-6061 DEAR NATIONAL FFA FOUNDATION SPONSORS, am pleased to report that 2006 was another in a series of watershed years for FFA, its 500,000 members I and the schools and communities in which it serves. Through your commitment, we were able to raise more than $12 million for the National FFA Foundation, ensuring that the good work of FFA will continue to grow. This is an extraordinary achievement, and my personal thanks to all of you who worked so hard for such a good cause. Our slogan for 2006, Serving Through Your Contributions, was borrowed from the FFA Motto – Forever blue Learning to Do; Doing to Learn; Earning to Live; Living to Serve. It represents the type of service that many of us are most capable of providing today; but more than that, it represents our ongoing willingness to serve in any way we can. Forever Blue represents all who value the hopeful spirit, generosity, These are the attributes being taught every day to young people through FFA and agricultural education, and they are what enthusiasm and high ideals embodied by the blue FFA jacket. It also differentiate the impressive young people of FFA. Success like this year’s campaign requires a visionary and committed group of people to drive to a new record level of represents the common connection among the thousands of people contributions, and I am privileged to have been a part of that team, the 2006 National FFA Foundation Sponsors’ Board and the who recognize the necessity of FFA and agricultural education in unmatched FFA Foundation staff. My personal thanks go out to all of you for your time, energy and dedication to FFA and the strengthening people, communities and the agricultural industry. The work of the foundation. Forever Blue family represents National FFA Alumni, former members, American agriculture is again facing a new era as traditional food and fiber production makes room for renewable fuel in a changing world. In addition, the expansion of agricultural education and FFA programs to a whole new range of subjects and career Collegiate FFA, National FFA Foundation sponsors, teachers, state opportunities is opening doors for more students than ever before. The mission of FFA and the impact of educational programs agricultural education administrators, teacher educators, donors and all built on “… developing the potential for premier leadership, personal growth and career success …” are now more important those friends of FFA who know the positive difference FFA makes in the than ever. We should all take great pride in the work we are doing to support this opportunity. lives of students by developing their potential for premier leadership, Thank you again for your support and for your ongoing belief in the value FFA brings to today’s world. personal growth and career success through agricultural education. Sincerely, Doug DeVries Doug DeVries Are you a member of the Forever Blue family? If so, then you support 2006 National FFA Sponsors’ Board Chairman Senior Vice President, Agricultural Marketing – North America, Australia and Asia FFA, the most enduring of high school organizations. Prestigious and Deere & Company successful alumni fill its roster. Your ongoing support is critical to NATIONAL FFA FOUNDATION SPONSORS’ keeping FFA powerful and relevant to a new generation – a generation BOARD EXECUTIVE COUNCIL whose expectation has changed dramatically. So as you review this DWIGHT ARMSTRONG, PH.D. annual report, consider your opportunity to contribute to the group that Chief Executive Officer North American Nutrition Companies, Inc. gives so much back – to the student, to the school, to the community 2005 Past Chairman and to you. GLENN A. STITH Vice President, NA & SA Operations, Seminis Seeds Division Monsanto Company 2007 Chair-Elect JERRY R. ROSE Corporate Vice President Cargill, Incorporated 2008 Chair-Elect Design: Bader Rutter & Associates Printing: Successful Farming 1 Scholarship donors LLOYD FORD SEGUIN MOTOR COmpANY WENDEL MOTOR CO. EAU ClAIRE FORD LINCOLN Itasca, TX Seguin, TX Yoakum, TX MERCURY Eau Claire, WI LOCKHART MOTOR CO. INC. SEWEll FORD WEST TEXAS FORD Lockhart, TX Odessa, TX Anson, TX GORDIE BOUCHER FORD LINCOLN MERCURY LONE STAR FORD SilsbEE FORD-LINCOLN- WHITEFACE FORD Janesville, WI Houston, TX MERCURY Hereford, TX Silsbee, TX Hill FORD LINCOLN MERCURY MAC HAIK FORD WiCHITA FAlls FORD Portage, WI Houston, TX SmiTH FORD-MERCURY OF Wichita Falls, TX SLATON JENSEN MOTORS INC. MAC HAIK FORD LINCOLN Slaton, TX Spencer, WI MERCURY UtaH Georgetown, TX SmiTH SOUTH PLAINS FORD BARBER BROTHERS FORD TOM PECK FORD Levelland, TX Clinton, WI MARSHAll FORD-LINCOLN- Morgan, UT MERCURY SOUTHWAY FORD ED KENLEY FORD Marshall, TX San Antonio, TX Layton, UT WEST VIRGINIA CHENOWETH FORD-LINCOLN- MCREE FORD SpiKES FORD GAYLEN S. WRIGHT FORD Dickinson, TX Mission, TX Heber City, UT MERCURY Clarksburg, WV MIKE BROWN FORD STANLEY FORD SAHARA MOTORS Granbury, TX Childress, TX Delta, UT JACK GARRETT FORD Spencer, WV NORTH CENTRAL FORD SYKORA FAmilY FORD Richardson, TX West, TX VIRGINA MICHAEL MOTOR COmpANY, INC. PARis FORD LINCOLN MERCURY TEAM FORD-MERCURY BROADWAY MOTOR CO., INC. Gassaway, WV Paris, TX Navasota, TX Broadway, VA PARSONS FORD PLANET FORD TEXOMA FORD OF DENisON EmpiRE FORD LINCOLN Martinsburg, WV Spring, TX Denison, TX MERCURY PRESTIGE FORD – GARLAND TipTON FORD INC. Abingdon, VA WYOMING NatIONAL FFA FOUNdatION SPONSORs’ BOARD Garland, TX Nacogdoches, TX MYERS FORD CO., INC. Elkton, VA GREINER FORD RED MCCOmbs FORD TOmmiE VAUGHN AUTO Casper, WY San Antonio, TX COUNTRY PAUL ObAUGH FORD-LINCOLN- SPRADLEY MOTORS, INC JOHN W. ALLENBACH LAURENCE M. CRANE, PH.D. JOE FELL Columbus, TX MERCURY ROGERS FORD Cheyenne, WY President Vice President, Education and Vice President & Division Merchandise Midland, TX TOmmiE VAUGHN MOTORS, INC. Staunton, VA Delta Consolidated Industries Communication Manager, Consumer Products Houston, TX THUNDER BAsiN FORD, LLC RON CARTER FORD, INC. National Crop Insurance Services Tractor Supply Company WASHINGTON Gillette, WY ALAN R. AYERS, PH.D. Alvin, TX TRI-COUNTY FORD Director, State Affairs/Stewardship TOM DAVIS BILL FLEET Mabank, TX FIVE STAR FORD RUssEll & SmiTH FORD Bayer CropScience Group Publisher Vice President, North America Aberdeen, WA Houston, TX VARsiTY FORD Meredith Corporation Sales, Pioneer and Crop College Station, TX RALPH H. BURCHFIELD SAM PACK’S FIVE STAR FORD Protection Sales & Marketing WISCONSIN President MICHAEL A. EADE Carrollton, TX VON DOHLEN MOTOR CO. DuPont Agriculture & Nutrition Firestone Agricultural Tire Division Executive Director – Sales – Goliad, TX COX MOTORS SAM PACK’S FIVE STAR FORD- New Richmond, WI Companion Animal USA DAVID S. GEIMAN NORTH RiCHLAND VONDERAU FORD Merial President North Richland Hills, TX El Campo, TX New Dominion Management continued on page 3 47 2 HillYER’S MID-CiTY FORD ANCIRA FORD MERCURY EDDIE YAKliN FORD LINCOLN HillARD AUTO PARK Woodburn, OR Floresville, TX MERCURY Fort Worth, TX Kingsville, TX LEGACY FORD LINCOLN ANDERSON FORD-MERCURY HillCREST FORD LINCOLN MERCURY, INC. Cleveland, TX ElliOTT FORD LINCOLN MERCURY La Grande, OR MERCURY Huntsville, TX AppEL FORD-MERCURY, INC. Mount Pleasant, TX RObbERSON FORD LINCOLN Brenham, TX HOffpAUIR FORD MERCURY EXCEL FORD LINCOLN MERCURY MERCURY ARROW FORD INC. Carthage, TX Bend, OR Abilene, TX Lampasas, TX FENTON FORD OF DUMAS SUBURBAN FORD Bill MCRAE FORD HOUSTON AREA DEALERS NatIONAL FFA FOUNdatION SPONSORs’ BOARD (continued) Sandy, OR Dumas, TX Jacksonville, TX IMMEL MOTORS FRANKliN FORD Fredericksburg, TX TillAMOOK MOTOR COmpANY BLUEBONNET MOTORS, INC. Tillamook, OR Wallisville, TX New Braunfels, TX IVEY MOTOR CO., INC. ROBErt D. GORDON ELTON H. MADDOX STUart PIERCE RICARDO LOPEZ VaLENCIA FRIENDLY FORD Robert Lee, TX Chief Executive Officer President and Chief Executive Director, National Advertising Senior Vice President, Head of BOB FRANCis FORD PENNSYLVANIA Crosby, TX DTN Officer and Sales Promotion Diversity Marketing Rusk, TX JACK POWEll FORD-MERCURY KiGHTliNGER MOTORS, INC. GENE HAMON FORD, INC. Mineral Wells, TX Wayne Farms LLC Chevrolet ING BOB TOMES FORD DENNIS HANN Coudersport, PA Texas City, TX McKinney, TX JENNINGS ANDERSON FORD Senior Director, Sales JOHN MADIA BEN POORE CECIL P. VANDYGRIFF, JR. GENE MEssER FORD Boerne, TX New Holland Global Leader - Human Resources, Truck Group Marketing Manager President BOB UTTER FORD LINCOLN SOUTH DAKOta Lubbock, TX Productivity and Site Ford Motor Company The Kent Group, Inc. MERCURY Jim BAss FORD THOMAS J. HEDGE Operations BEADLE FORD INC. Sherman, TX GillEspiE FORD San Angelo, TX Manufacturing Vice President BRAD SCHU NatHAN WALKER Bowdle, SD San Antonio, TX Dow AgroSciences LLC BOGGUS HARliNGEN FORD JOHNSON BROS. FORD, LTD. Kraft Foods Global Inc. Director - Lifestyle Group Vice President, Independent MCKiE FORD LINCOLN Harlingen, TX GlENN POLK FORD Temple, TX DEAN A. MEFFORD Land O’Lakes Purina Feeds Retail Group MERCURY, INC. Gainesville, TX RICHARD HENDERSON, JR. President MTD Products, Inc. Rapid City, SD BUD CROss FORD JOHNSON SEWEll FORD President and Chief
Recommended publications
  • TRIPS and MONOPOLIES on SEEDS and MEDICINES Vandana
    295 PROFITEERING FROM DEATH: TRIPS AND MONOPOLIES ON SEEDS AND MEDICINES Vandana Shiva 1 1 WTO AND THE TRIPS AGREEMENT The Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights Agreement of WTO is the most far reaching in terms of creating corporate rights and corporate monopolies. During the Uruguay Round of the GATT, the United States introduced its flawed patent system into the WTO, and thus imposed it on the rest of the world. US Corporations have admitted that they drafted and lobbied on behalf of TRIPs. As a Monsanto spokesman said, “The industries and traders of world commerce have played simultaneously the role of patients, the diagnosticians, and prescribing physicians.” TRIPs not only made Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) laws global geographically, but also removed ethical boundaries by including life forms and biodiversity into patentable subject matter. Living organisms and life forms that are self-creating were thus redefined as machines and artifacts made and invented by the patentee. Intellectual property rights and patents then give the patent holder a monopolistic right to prevent others from making, using, or selling seeds. Seed saving by farmers has now been redefined from a sacred duty to a criminal offence of stealing “property”. Article 27.3 (b) of the TRIPs agreement, which relates to patents on living resources, was basically pushed by the “Life Science” companies to establish themselves as Lords of Life. The chemical companies of the world have bought up seed and biotechnology companies and reorganized themselves as Life Science corporations, claiming patents on genes, seeds, plants and animals. Ciba Geigy and Sandoz have combined to form Novartis, Hoechst has joined with Rhone 1 Phd in the Philosophy of Science (1978) , Right Livelihood Award (1993), director of the Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Ecology, New Delhi, India.
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Citizens Report on the State of Gmos Synthesis Report !"#$%&'$#&(#)')$ "*+$,'$-.'!"#+
    !"#$%&'$#&(#)')$ "*+$,'$-.'!"#+ Published by A Global Citizens Report on the State of GMOs Synthesis Report !"#$%&'$#&(#)')$ "*+$,'$-.'!"#+ !"#$%&'$"()*)+,-."/,0%1*" %-"*2,"3*'*,"%4"#56."7 8'$.,"91%:).,.;"8')$,<"=,>2-%$%?),. 3@-*2,.)."/,0%1* Coordinated by Vandana Shiva, Navdanya Debbie Barker, Centre for Food Safety Caroline Lockhart, Navdanya International Front page cartoon: Sergio Staino Layout, production and printing: SICREA srl, Florence Contact: [email protected] Available for download at www.navdanyainternational.it www.navdanya.org Thanks go to all those who readily contributed in the realization of this report, particularly Sergio Staino, creator of the cover cartoon, Maurizio Izzo of Sicrea for production and Massimo Orlandi for press and communications. Thanks also go to Christina Stafford and interns Tara McNerney and Tanvi Gadhia of Center for Food Safety (CFS) and Sulakshana Fontana, Elena Bellini and Filippo Cimo of Navdanya International for their diligent coordination, editing and translation efforts. Final thanks also go to Giannozzo Pucci, Maria Grazia Mammuccini and Natale Bazzanti for their cooperation and assistance in realizing this report. This publication is printed on ecological paper SYMBOL FREELIFE SATIN ECF *$%/012/$-3435678$)690:4$ 07$4;6$+4246$0<$%&'8$=$ >2/86$(:0?3868@$>23/6A$!6B;70/0C368 Coordinated by Navdanya and Navdanya International, the International Commission on the Future of Food and Agriculture, with the participation of The Center for Food Safety (CFS) Contributing organizations:
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting and Promoting Traditional Knowledge: Systems, National Experiences and International Dimensions
    United Nations Conference on Trade and Development PROTECTING AND PROMOTING TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE: SYSTEMS, NATIONAL EXPERIENCES AND INTERNATIONAL DIMENSIONS Sophia Twarog and Promila Kapoor, Editors UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2004 i Note Symbols of the United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this volume are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the UNCTAD secretariat. Material in this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted, but acknowledgement is re- quested, together with a reference to the document number. A copy of the publication contain- ing the quotation or reprint should be sent to the UNCTAD secretariat (c/o Administrative Secretary, Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities, Palais des Nations, 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland). Cover photo by Jean Philippe Soule courtesy of www.nativeplanet.org UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Symbol No. UNCTAD/DITC/TED/10 ISSN: 1812-7061 Copyright © United Nations, 2004 All rights reserved ii Foreword The preservation, protection and promotion of the traditional knowledge, innovations and prac- tices of local and indigenous communities (TK) is of key importance for developing countries. Their rich endowment of TK and biodiversity plays a critical role in their health care, food security, culture, religion, identity, environment, sustainable development and trade.
    [Show full text]
  • Transgénicos: El Prontuario Criminal De Monsanto Por Fernando Glenza
    Transgénicos: El prontuario criminal de Monsanto Por Fernando Glenza Agencia Prensa Mercosur Una reciente resolución de las autoridades científicas de Argentina invita a recordar la historia negra de esta transnacional norteamericana que atenta contra el medio ambiente y la vida. Monsanto se presenta a sí misma como una empresa visionaria, una fuerza de la historia mundial que trabaja para aportar ciencia de vanguardia y una actitud ambientalmente responsable a la solución de los problemas más urgentes de la humanidad. Pero, ¿qué es en realidad Monsanto? ¿Cuál es su origen? ¿Cómo llegó a ser el segundo productor mundial de agroquímicos y uno de los principales proveedores de semillas en el planeta?. ¿Es Monsanto la compañía "limpia y verde" que proclaman sus anuncios, o los mismos apenas representan una operación de imagen que oculta la naturaleza criminal de la compañía? En una Resolución del 13 de diciembre de 2004, el Comité Nacional de Etica en la Ciencia y la Tecnología (CECTE), dependiente del Ministerio de Educación, Ciencia y Tecnología de Argentina, tomó conocimiento de la convocatoria al Premio "Animarse a Emprender", instituido por el Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas, Educativas y Técnicas (CONICET) y la empresa Monsanto, que otorgaba 30 mil dólares al mejor proyecto en el área de biotecnología y medio ambiente, y recogió las inquietudes formuladas sobre este premio por algunos investigadores. En atención a esas consideraciones, el CECTE estimó que es "inconveniente" que una institución pública de la ciencia y la tecnología se asocie en el otorgamiento de premios a la investigación científica o tecnológica con organizaciones o empresas que "son objeto de cuestionamientos éticos por sus responsabilidades y acciones concretas en detrimento del bienestar general y el medioambiente".
    [Show full text]
  • Monsantos Harvest of Fear
    Monsanto's Harvest of Fear | Politics | Vanity Fair http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/05/monsanto200805?pri... I NVESTI GATI ON Monsanto already dominates America’s food chain with its genetically modified seeds. Now it has targeted milk production. Just as frightening as the corporation’s tactics–ruthless legal battles against small farmers–is its decades-long history of toxic contamination. BY DONALD L. BARLETT AND JAMES B. STEELE MAY 2008 No thanks: An anti-Monsanto crop circle made by farmers and volunteers in the Philippines. By Melvyn Calderon/Greenpeace HO/A.P. Images. Gary Rinehart clearly remembers the summer day in 2002 when the stranger walked in and issued his threat. Rinehart was behind the counter of the Square Deal, his “old-time country store,” as he calls it, on the fading town square of Eagleville, Missouri, a tiny farm community 100 miles north of Kansas City. The Square Deal is a fixture in Eagleville, a place where farmers and townspeople can go for lightbulbs, greeting cards, hunting gear, ice cream, aspirin, and dozens of other small items without having to drive to a big-box store in Bethany, the county seat, 15 miles down Interstate 35. Everyone knows Rinehart, who was born and raised in the area and runs one of Eagleville’s few surviving businesses. The stranger came up to the counter and asked for him by name. 1 of 19 4/18/2010 9:28 PM Monsanto's Harvest of Fear | Politics | Vanity Fair http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/05/monsanto200805?pri... “Well, that’s me,” said Rinehart.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Report for Monsanto Company
    Strategic Report for Monsanto Company Kevin Yamazaki Anastasia Dialynas Jed Cullen April 7, 2010 Monsanto Company Table of Contents Executive Summary................................................................................................... 3 Company History ....................................................................................................... 5 Monsanto’s Beginnings (1901-1960)........................................................................ 5 The Birth of Monsanto’s Agricultural Division (1960-1997) ...................................... 5 The ‘New’ Monsanto (1997-2009) ............................................................................ 7 Competitive Analysis................................................................................................. 9 Internal Rivalry........................................................................................................ 10 Entry Threat............................................................................................................ 12 Buyer Power........................................................................................................... 14 Supplier Power ....................................................................................................... 16 Substitutes.............................................................................................................. 17 Complements ......................................................................................................... 21 Financial Analysis...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Monsanto-Report
    Monsanto Ein Gentechnik-Gigant kontrolliert die Landwirtschaft Report von Greenpeace Deutschland April 2005 Herausgeber: Greenpeace e.V., 22745 Hamburg, Tel. 040-30618-0, Fax 040-30618-100, Email: [email protected], Politische Vertretung Berlin, Marienstraße 19-20, 10117 Berlin, Tel. 030-308899-0, Fax 030-308899-30, Internet: www.greenpeace.de Studie: Monsanto – Ein Gentechnik-Gigant kontrolliert die Landwirtschaft • V.i.S.d.P.: Henning Strodthoff• Stand: April 2005 • Titelfotos: Ulrich Baatz, Christian Lehsten, Matthias Ziegler / Greenpeace. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Einleitung 1 2. Die Macht-Strategien Monsantos 2 2.1 Strategie 1: Kaufen 3 2.2 Strategie 2: Patentieren 3 2.3 Strategie 3: Kontrollieren 4 2.3.1 Kontrolle durch Verträge 5 2.3.2 Kontrolle durch Detektive 5 2.3.3 Kontrolle durch erzwungene Einigungen 6 2.3.4 Kontrolle durch Verklagen 6 2.4 Strategie 4: Kontaminieren 7 3. Monsanto weltweit 8 4. Monsanto drängt auf den deutschen Markt 10 5. Einflussnahme auf politische Entscheidungsträger und Institutionen 11 6. Monsanto und das Gesetz 12 7. Monsantos Skandalchronik 15 8. Mangelhafte Produkte 16 9. Zusammenfassung 17 10. Quellen 19 1. Einleitung 1901 gründete der Pharma-Angestellte John Francis Queeny die Chemie-Firma Monsanto. Schon das erste Produkt, das Monsanto 1903 auf den Markt brachte, war ein ökonomischer Glücksgriff - der künstliche Süßstoff Saccharin. Seitdem expandierte das Unternehmen unaufhaltsam zu einem führenden Pharma- und Chemieproduzenten. In Monsantos Produktpalette finden sich Aspirin ebenso wie das gefürchtete Vietnamkrieg- Entlaubungsmittel "Agent Orange", dioxinhaltige Herbizide und das Rinderwachstumshormon rBST. Ende der 1970er Jahre nahm der Konzern die Entwicklungsarbeit an gentechnisch veränderten Pflanzen auf und war damit einer der Pioniere auf diesem Sektor.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court Eastern District of Missouri Eastern Division
    Case: 4:05-cv-01108-ERW Doc. #: 190 Filed: 09/20/07 Page: 1 of 50 PageID #: <pageID> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION HILMER SCHOENBAUM, ) on behalf of himself and all ) others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 4:05CV01108 ERW ) E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND ) COMPANY, PIONEER HI-BRED ) INTERNATIONAL, INC., and ) MONSANTO COMPANY, ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Defendants E.I. DuPont De Numours and Company; Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.; and Monsanto Company’s Joint Motion to Dismiss [doc. #138]. I. BACKGROUND FACTS Defendant Monsanto Company develops, manufacturers, licenses, and sells agricultural biotechnology, agricultural chemicals, and other agricultural products. Monsanto developed plant biotechnology that enabled the creation of genetically improved crops by transferring into crop seed one or more genes that give the resulting plants various favorable traits. One type of genetically modified crop seed marketed by Monsanto is Roundup Ready® corn and soybean seed, which is resistant to glyphosate-based herbicides, such as Monsanto’s Roundup® brand herbicide. One other genetically modified crop seed is Monsanto’s YieldGard® corn seed, which is resistant to certain pests and insects. Monsanto holds the patent on these technologies. Case: 4:05-cv-01108-ERW Doc. #: 190 Filed: 09/20/07 Page: 2 of 50 PageID #: <pageID> Monsanto sells its patented technology to seed producers, including Defendants E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company (“Defendant DuPont” or “DuPont”) and Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. (“Defendant Pioneer” or “Pioneer”), under a license to use the gene technology to create certain genetically-modified soybean and corn seeds.
    [Show full text]
  • RESTRICTED Bayer Annual Report 2020 Five-Year Summary 2
    Bayer-Geschäftsbericht 2018 A Zusammengefasster Lagebericht 1 Fehler! Kein Text mit angegebener Formatvorlage im Dokument. Annual Report RESTRICTED Bayer Annual Report 2020 Five-Year Summary 2 Five-Year Summary € million 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Bayer Group financial KPIs Sales 34,943 35,015 36,742 43,545 41,400 EBITDA1 8,801 8,563 9,695 9,529 (2,910) EBITDA before special items1 9,318 9,288 8,969 11,474 11,461 EBITDA margin before special items1 26.7% 26.5% 24.4% 26.3% 27.7% EBIT1 5,738 5,903 3,454 4,162 (16,169) EBIT before special items1 6,826 7,130 6,013 6,975 7,095 Income before income taxes 4,773 4,577 1,886 2,853 (17,250) Net income (from continuing and discontinued operations) 4,531 7,336 1,695 4,091 (10,495) Earnings per share (from continuing and discontinued operations) (€)1 5.44 8.29 1.80 4.17 (10.68) Core earnings per share (from continuing operations) (€)1 6.67 6.64 5.60 6.38 6.39 Free cash flow 5,806 5,202 4,652 4,214 1,343 Net financial debt 11,778 3,595 35,679 34,068 30,041 Capital expenditures (newly capitalized) 2,627 2,418 2,368 2,920 3,138 Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) (%) 10.3 10.8 4.0 3.7 – 16,5 Bayer AG Total dividend payment 2,233 2,402 2,611 2,751 1,965 Dividend per share (€) 2.70 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.00 Bayer Group nonfinancial KPIs2 Number of smallholder farmers in LMICs who have received support (million) – – – 42 45 Number of women in LMICs who have gained access to modern contraception (million) – – – 38 40 Number of people in underserved communities whose self-care needs have been supported by Bayer interventions
    [Show full text]
  • October 23, 2008 a Private Sector Approach to Agricultural Biotechnology Dr
    SM October 23, 2008 A Private Sector Approach to Agricultural Biotechnology Dr. Robb Fraley Dr. Dusty Post Chief Technology Officer Global Corn Technology Lead Monsanto Company Monsanto Company Notes Certain statements contained in this presentation are “forward-looking statements,”such as statements concerning the company’s anticipated financial results, current and future product performance, regulatory approvals, business and financial plans and other non-historical facts. These statements are based on current expectations and currently available information. However, since these statements are basedon factors that involve risks and uncertainties, the company’s actual performance and results may differ materially from those described or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, among others: continued competition in seeds, traits and agricultural chemicals; the company’s exposure to various contingencies, including those related to intellectual property protection, regulatory compliance and the speed with which approvals are received, and public acceptance of biotechnology products; the success of the company’s research and development activities; the outcomes of major lawsuits, including proceedings related to Solutia Inc.; developments related to foreign currencies and economies; successful operation of recent acquisitions; fluctuations in commodity prices; compliance with regulations affecting our manufacturing; the accuracy of the company’s estimates related to distribution inventory levels; the company’s ability to fund its short-term financing needs and to obtain payment for the products thatit sells; the effect of weather conditions, natural disasters and accidents on the agriculture business or the company’s facilities; and other risks and factors detailed in the company’s filings with the SEC.
    [Show full text]
  • Monsanto Company 2016 Annual Report
    2016 ANNUAL REPORT A LIMITLESS PERSPECTIVE MAKING LIMITED RESOURCES WORK FOR 9 BILLION PEOPLE Water, air and soil are as relevant as they’ve ever been. And with the growing demand on them for nourishment of an increasing population, sustainability is more than a buzzword—it’s a priority, and an opportunity to unlock possibilities. We’ve always needed our world’s finite resources. With 9 billion people, our global resources will have to work harder and deliver more value in the face of climate change as we work to conserve and preserve our planet. Local challenges call for creative problem solving. Today and in the future, those who act as good stewards of our resources can discover the infinite possibilities within them. 2016 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (in millions, except per share amounts) Years ended Aug. 31 2016 2015 2014 % Change 2016 vs. 2015 OPERATING RESULTS Net Sales $ 13,502 $ 15,001 $ 15,855 (10%) EBIT1 $ 2,408 $ 3,500 $ 3,952 (31%) Net Income Attributable to Monsanto Company $ 1,336 $ 2,314 $ 2,740 (42%) Diluted Earnings per Share2 $ 2.99 $ 4.81 $ 5.22 (38%) OTHER SELECTED DATA Free Cash Flow 3 $ 1,724 $ 2,089 $ 959 (17%) Capital Expenditures $ 923 $ 967 $ 1,005 (5%) Depreciation and Amortization $ 727 $ 716 $ 691 2% Diluted Shares Outstanding2 447.1 481.4 524.9 (7%) 15.85 5.73 2.09 15 5.22 5.23 13.5 4.81 1.72 4.48 2.99 0.96 AS REPORTED ONGOING AS REPORTED ONGOING AS REPORTED ONGOING 2014 2015 2016 2014 2015 2016 2014 2015 2016 NET SALES EARNINGS PER SHARE FREE CASH FLOW In billions of dollars, In dollars, In billions of dollars, for years ended Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • Concentration of Market Power in the Eu Seed Market
    1 CONCENTRATION OF MARKET POWER IN THE EU SEED MARKET AUTHOR: IVAN MAMMANA STUDY COMMISSIONED BY THE GREENS/EFA GROUP IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Concentration of market power in the EU seed market 3 INTRODUCTION 3 CONCENTRATION OF This study sheds light upon the increasing concentration of the EU seed market. It uses industry data to show that the mantra of the seed lobby and giant seed companies, that the EU market is healthy MARKET POWER IN and diversifi ed and there are some 7000 mainly small and medium enterprises (SMEs), is misleading. Notably, in the absence of freely available data and independently verifi able statistics, the European Commission is forced to rely upon industry statistics and further promotes the industry myth. This THE EU SEED MARKET allows the corporations to dominate the narrative and manipulate the arguments to the general public on what is in their best interest. The European Commission has been accused of drafting the seed marketing law 1 to benefi t the big seed lobby, who in turn claim they are not a big lobby but a multitude of some 7000 medium and small players. The DG SANCO of the European Commission routinely contradicts itself when its representatives state quote industry fi gures that there is no concentration in the EU market(s), while in their own impact assessment for the Seed marketing regulation they state that 95% of the vegetable seed sector is controlled by a mere 5 companies. In the case of maize, just 5 seed companies control around 75% of the EU market share.
    [Show full text]