DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 95/Friday, May 15, 2020/Notices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 95/Friday, May 15, 2020/Notices Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 95 / Friday, May 15, 2020 / Notices 29481 cultural area (where the human remains Indian Tribe (previously listed as the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To and associated funerary objects listed in Yavapai-Prescott Tribe of the Yavapai request additional information about this notice were found) demonstrates Reservation, Arizona); and the Zuni this ICR, contact Elizabeth Vehmeyer by continuity between the earlier people Tribe of the Zuni Reservation, New email at [email protected], and the present-day O’Odham. Mexico (hereafter referred to as ‘‘The or by telephone at 202–354–2215. The Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation, Tribes’’). Individuals who are hearing or speech Arizona; Yavapai-Apache Nation of the impaired may call the Federal Relay Additional Requestors and Disposition Camp Verde Indian Reservation, Service at 1–800–877–8339 for TTY Arizona; and the Yavapai-Prescott Lineal descendants or representatives assistance. You may also view the ICR Indian Tribe (previously listed as the of any Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ Yavapai-Prescott Tribe of the Yavapai organization not identified in this notice PRAMain. Reservation, Arizona) comprise one that wish to request transfer of control SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In cultural group known as the Yavapai. of these human remains should submit They trace their ancestry to bands once accordance with the Paperwork a written request with information in Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA, 44 U.S.C. living in the Sinagua archeological support of the request to Lindsey Vogel- cultural area. 3501 et seq.) and 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1), all Teeter, Pueblo Grande Museum, 4619 E. information collections require approval The Hopi Tribe of Arizona considers Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034, all of Arizona to be within traditional under the PRA. We may not conduct or telephone (602) 534–1572, email sponsor and you are not required to Hopi lands or within areas where Hopi [email protected], by clans migrated in the past. Oral respond to a collection of information June 15, 2020. After that date, if no unless it displays a currently valid OMB traditions and material culture, additional requestors have come including pottery traditions, control number. forward, transfer of control of the As part of our continuing effort to demonstrate continuity between the human remains to The Tribes may Sinagua archeological culture and the reduce paperwork and respondent proceed. burdens, we invite the public and other Hopi people. The Pueblo Grande Museum is The Zuni Tribe of the Zuni Federal agencies to comment on new, responsible for notifying The Tribes that proposed, revised, and continuing Reservation, New Mexico, considers the this notice has been published. Verde Valley to be within the migration collections of information. This helps us path of ancestral Zuni people. Dated: February 28, 2020. assess the impact of our information Archeological evidence, including Melanie O’Brien, collection requirements and minimize similarities in ceramic designs, Manager, National NAGPRA Program. the public’s reporting burden. It also demonstrates continuity between the [FR Doc. 2020–10432 Filed 5–14–20; 8:45 am] helps the public understand our prehistoric people of the Sinagua BILLING CODE 4312–52–P information collection requirements and archeological cultural area and the provide the requested data in the people of Zuni. desired format. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR We are especially interested in public Determinations Made by the Pueblo comment addressing the following: Grande Museum National Park Service (1) Whether or not the collection of Officials of the Pueblo Grande information is necessary for the proper Museum have determined that: [NPS–WASO–CR–NHAP–NPS0029854; performance of the functions of the • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(9), the PPWOCRADI0, PCU00RP14.R50000 (200); agency, including whether or not the human remains described in this notice OMB Control Number 1024–NEW] information will have practical utility; represent the physical remains of seven (2) The accuracy of our estimate of the individuals of Native American Agency Information Collection burden for this collection of ancestry. Activities; National Heritage Areas information, including the validity of • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(3)(A), Program Annual Reporting Forms the methodology and assumptions used; the two objects described in this notice (3) Ways to enhance the quality, AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. are reasonably believed to have been utility, and clarity of the information to placed with or near individual human ACTION: Notice of Information be collected; and remains at the time of death or later as Collection; request for comment. (4) How might the agency minimize part of the death rite or ceremony. the burden of the collection of SUMMARY: In accordance with the • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), there information on those who are to Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we, is a relationship of shared group respond, including through the use of the National Park Service (NPS) are identity that can be reasonably traced appropriate automated, electronic, proposing a new information collection. between the Native American human mechanical, or other technological remains and the Ak-Chin Indian DATES: Interested persons are invited to collection techniques or other forms of Community (previously listed as the Ak submit comments on or before July 14, information technology, e.g., permitting Chin Indian Community of the 2020. electronic submission of response. Maricopa (Ak Chin) Indian Reservation, ADDRESSES: Send your comments on Comments that you submit in Arizona); Fort McDowell Yavapai this information collection request (ICR) response to this notice are a matter of Nation, Arizona; Gila River Indian by mail to Phadrea Ponds, Acting public record. We will include or Community of the Gila River Indian Information Collection Clearance summarize each comment in our request Reservation, Arizona; Hopi Tribe of Officer, National Park Service, 1201 to OMB to approve this ICR. Before Arizona; Salt River Pima-Maricopa Oakridge Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525; including your address, phone number, Indian Community of the Salt River or by email to [email protected]. email address, or other personal Reservation, Arizona; Tohono O’Odham Please reference Office of Management identifying information in your Nation of Arizona; Yavapai-Apache and Budget (OMB) Control Number comment, you should be aware that Nation of the Camp Verde Indian 1024–NHA in the subject line of your your entire comment—including your Reservation, Arizona; Yavapai-Prescott comments. personal identifying information—may VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:09 May 14, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00090 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM 15MYN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES 29482 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 95 / Friday, May 15, 2020 / Notices be made publicly available at any time. Frequency of Collection: Annually. [email protected]. Hearing impaired While you can ask us in your comment Total Estimated Annual Nonhour individuals are advised to withhold your personal identifying Burden Cost: None. that information on this matter can be information from public review, we An agency may not conduct or obtained by contacting the cannot guarantee that we will be able to sponsor and a person is not required to Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) do so. respond to a collection of information 205–1810. Persons with mobility Abstract: National Heritage Areas unless it displays a currently valid OMB impairments who will need special (NHAs) are designated by Congress as control number. assistance in gaining access to the places of natural, cultural, and historic The authority for this action is the Commission should contact the Office significance. Authorized by the Historic Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 of the Secretary at (202) 205–2000. Sites Act of 1935 (54 U.S.C. Ch. 3201), U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). General information concerning the the NPS NHA Program Office is Phadrea Ponds, Commission may also be obtained by responsible for tracking the performance Acting Information Collection Clearance accessing its internet server at https:// and progress of each heritage area in Officer, National Park Service. www.usitc.gov. implementing its management plans [FR Doc. 2020–10482 Filed 5–14–20; 8:45 am] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: and goals. The reporting forms in the BILLING CODE 4312–52–P Pathenia Proctor, Office of Unfair collection will track performance Import Investigations, U.S. International metrics needed to distribute funds and Trade Commission, telephone (202) report on heritage area management and 205–2560. budgetary activities as directed by INTERNATIONAL TRADE SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Congress. COMMISSION Authority: The authority for NHAs combine conservation, [Investigation No. 337–TA–1199] institution of this investigation is recreation, and economic development contained in section 337 of the Tariff to form a cohesive, nationally important Certain Tobacco Heating Articles and Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. landscape. The NHA program currently Components Thereof; Institution of 1337, and in section 210.10 of the includes 49 heritage areas. To track the Investigation Commission’s Rules of Practice and performance of each NHA and facilitate AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2019). mandated financial reporting, the NPS Commission. Scope of Investigation: Having
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 7 the Enduring Hopi
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln HOPI NATION: Essays on Indigenous Art, Culture, History, and Law History, Department of September 2008 Chapter 7 The Enduring Hopi Peter Iverson Arizona State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/hopination Part of the Indigenous Studies Commons Iverson, Peter, "Chapter 7 The Enduring Hopi" (2008). HOPI NATION: Essays on Indigenous Art, Culture, History, and Law. 16. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/hopination/16 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in HOPI NATION: Essays on Indigenous Art, Culture, History, and Law by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. CHAPTER 7 The Enduring Hopi Peter Iverson “What then is the meaning of the tricentennial observance? It is a reaffirmation of continuity and hope for the collective Hopi future.” The Hopi world is centered on and around three mesas in northeastern Arizona named First, Sec- ond, and Third. It is at first glance a harsh and rugged land, not always pleasing to the untrained eye. Prosperity here can only be realized with patience, determination, and a belief in tomorrow.1 For over 400 years, the Hopis have confronted the incursion of outside non-Indian societies. The Spanish entered Hopi country as early as 1540. Then part of Francisco Vásquez de Coronado’s explor- ing party invaded the area with characteristic boldness and superciliousness. About twenty Spaniards, including a Franciscan missionary, confronted some of the people who resided in the seven villages that now comprise the Hopi domain, and under the leadership of Pedro de Tovar, the Spanish over- came Hopi resistance, severely damaging the village of Kawaiokuh, and winning unwilling surrender.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Perspectives on the Hohokam
    Bulletin of Old Pueblo Archaeology Center Tucson, Arizona December 2009 Number 60 Michael Hampshire’s artist rendition of Pueblo Grande platform mound (right); post-excavation view of compound area northwest of Pueblo Grande platform mound (above) TRIBAL PERSPECTIVES ON THE HOHOKAM Donald Bahr, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus, Arizona State University The archaeologists’ name for the principal pre-European culture of southern Arizona is Hohokam, a word they adopted from the O’odham (formerly Pima-Papago). I am not sure which archaeologist first used that word. It seems that the first documented but unpublished use is from 1874 or 1875 (Haury 1976:5). In any case, since around then archaeologists have used their methods to define and explain the origin, development, geographic extent, and end of the Hohokam culture. This article is not about the archaeologists’ Hohokam, but about the stories and explanations of past peoples as told by the three Native American tribes who either grew from or replaced the archaeologists’ Hohokam on former Hohokam land. These are the O’odham, of course, but also the Maricopa and Yavapai. The Maricopa during European times (since about 1550) lived on lands previously occupied by the Hohokam and Patayan archaeological cultures, and the Yavapai lived on lands of the older Hohokam, Patayan, Hakataya, Salado, and Western Anasazi cultures – to use all of the names that have been used, sometimes overlappingly, for previous cultures of the region. The Stories The O’odham word huhugkam means “something that is used up or finished.” The word consists of the verb huhug, which means “to be used up or finished,” and the suffix “-kam,” which means “something that is this way.” Huhug is generally, and perhaps only, used as an intransitive, not a transitive, verb.
    [Show full text]
  • Ashiwi Awan Messenger Issue 14
    A:shiwi A:wan Messenger Messenger Special Issue 14 • May 5, 2021 Pueblo of Zuni Receives Capital Outlay Zuni Signs Arizona Funding for Sewer Line Extension Project Gaming Compact Governor Val Panteah and the Zuni homes on septic tank systems on The Zuni Tribe participated in a Tribal Council are pleased to Shalako Drive. The New Mexico signing ceremony on April 15 at the announce the 2021 Capital Outlay Indian Affairs Department will Heard Museum in Phoenix to mark awards from the 55th Legislative administer these funds. completion of the new gaming Session, held January 19 through compact amendments. On behalf of March 20, 2021. During each We thank our Legislators: State the Zuni Tribe, Governor Val R. regular session, there is a three- Representative Lee Alcon (House Panteah, Sr., Lt. Governor Carleton week window when legislators and District 6) and State Senators Bowekaty, and Head Councilwoman the State review Capital Outlay George Munoz (Senate District 4) Virginia Chavez met with Arizona requests. This session was all virtual and Joshua Sanchez (Senate Governor Doug Ducey and leaders due to the COVID pandemic. District 30), along with Governor from the other negotiating tribes. Michelle Lujan Grisham. We also Governor Lujan Grisham’s 2021 extend thanks to Representative The compact amendments are the initiatives included water, energy, Javier Martinez, who carried the result of five years of extensive work and broadband. The Pueblo Capital Outlay Bill, HB-285. to reach terms to extend and submitted requests for three strengthen the current gaming projects: Broadband, Sewer Line Efforts to fund broadband through compact, while modernizing key Extension, and Zuni Fair Building.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Lands
    ArizonA indiAn GAminG AssociAtion • AnnuAl report FY 2008 TRIBAL LANDS PAGE San Juan Kaibab-Paiute Tribe Southern Paiute Tribe Navajo Nation Havasupai Hopi Tribe Tribe Hualapai Tribe KINGMAN FLAGSTAFF Fort Mojave Tribe CAMP VERDE Yavapai-Apache Nation Zuni Tribe PRESCOTT Yavapai Prescott Tribe PAYSON Tonto Apache Colorado River Tribe Indian Tribes White Mountain Fort McDowell Apache Tribe Yavapai Nation PHOENIX San Carlos Salt River Apache Tribe Pima-Maricopa Gila River Indian Community Fort Yuma- Indian Quechan Tribe Community Ak-Chin Indian Community YUMA Cocopah Tribe Tohono TUCSON O’odham Pascua Yaqui Tribe Nation Ak-Chin Indian Community Havasupai Tribe San Juan Southern Harrah's Ak-Chin Casino Paiute Tribe Hualapai Tribe Cocopah Tribe Tohono O’odham Nation Cocopah Casino Hopi Tribe* Desert Diamond Casino I & II and Golden Ha’San Casino Colorado River Indian Tribes* Kaibab-Paiute Tribe Blue Water Casino Tonto Apache Tribe Mazatzal Casino Fort McDowell Navajo Nation Yavapai Nation White Mountain Apache Tribe Fort McDowell Casino Pascua Yaqui Tribe Hon Dah Casino Casino of the Sun Fort Mojave Indian Tribe Casino Del Sol Yavapai-Apache Nation Spirit Mountain Casino Cliff Castle Casino Valley, Avi Resort Casino Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Yavapai Prescott Tribe* Casino Arizona at Salt River Fort Yuma-Quechan Tribe Yavapai Gaming Center Casino Arizona at Talking Stick Paradise Casino & Bucky’s Casino San Carlos Apache Tribe Gila River Indian Community Apache Gold Casino Zuni Tribe Gila River Casinos at Wild Horse Pass, Lone Butte and Vee Quiva *Not a member of AIGA Letter From The Chairwoman It is with pleasure that we present our fifth Annual Report for the Arizona Indian Gaming Association (AIGA).
    [Show full text]
  • Hopi and the Grand Canyon
    The Hopi Landscape and People The current Hopi reservation occupies but a small portion of the Hopi’s ancestral territory. Completely surrounded by the Navajo, the Hopi Reservation sits near the center of an area commonly called Hopitutskwa [Hopi toots-kwa]. The term means “Hopi lands” and refers to the entire landscape over which Hopi’s ancestors migrated. In recent times, in part do to land claim cases, Hopitutskwa has come to be applied to a much more restricted geographic area. Beyond this area is a much broader region over which the Hopi and their ancestors lived, traveled, and interacted with the other groups in the southwest. Because Hopi ancestors (histatsinom [hee- sat-see-nom]) came to the Hopi mesas from many different directions, they each brought unique knowledge, customs, and understandings of their past. Hopi is made up of many different clans that still retain this individuality; clan knowledge and history is not shared between clans. Hopi and Öngtupqa (the Grand Canyon) Öngtupqa [oung-toop-ka] plays an ongoing central role in many aspects of Hopi culture and history: Origin – many Hopi clans identify Öngtupqa, specifically the Sipapuni I [sea-pa-poony], as the origin point for people. It is here that the peoples of the earth emerged from the Third World into this, the Fourth World. Migrations – Upon emergence into the Fourth World, the Hopi ancestors entered into a spiritual pact with Ma’saw, the guardian of the Fourth World, to become stewards of the earth. In fulfilling this pact, the Hopi ancestors were instructed to travel to the corners of the land, leaving their “footprints” as evidence of their passing, as they searched for the center of the universe, the Hopi Mesas.
    [Show full text]
  • Yavapai County County Seat: Prescott
    County Profile for Yavapai County County Seat: Prescott Yavapai County, one of the state’s oldest counties, was among the original four created when Arizona was still a territory. Although Yavapai County originally encompassed more than 65,000 square miles, it now covers only 8,125 square miles, but is still as large as the state of New Jersey. It was called the "Mother of Counties," from which Apache, Coconino, Gila, Maricopa and Navajo counties were all formed. The provisional seat of the territorial government was established at Fort Whipple in Chino Valley on Jan. 22, 1864. Nine months later it was moved 20 miles away to the little mining community of Prescott. In 1867, the capital was moved to Tucson where it remained for 10 years. Then the capital was shifted back to Prescott, where it remained until 1889, when it was permanently relocated to Phoenix. Prescott is now the county seat of Yavapai County. Yavapai County offers many local attractions ranging from natural to cultural to educational. Scenic pine forests provide yeare-round recreational opportunities, and museums, monuments and rodeos reflect Arizona’s tribal and territorial past. Institutions of higher learning include two colleges and an aeronautical university. The county has experienced tremendous growth in recent years, with the population up by more than 30 percent since 1990. The U.S. Forest Service owns 38 percent of the land in Yavapai County, including portions of Prescott, Tonto and Coconino national forests, while the state of Arizona owns an additional 25 percent. Twenty-five percent of land in the county is owned by individuals or corporations, and 12 percent is the property of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Sacred Waters
    --------------------------- System Warning --------------------------- Warning: A problem with the cooling system has been detected. Please turn off the computer immediately, and return it for service. --------------------------- OK --------------------------- Restoring Sacred Waters A Guide to Protecting Tribal Non-Consumptive Water Uses in the Colorado River Basin Restoring Sacred Waters A Guide to Protecting Tribal Non-Consumptive Water Uses in the Colorado River Basin Julie Nania and Julia Guarino Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment 2014 Acknowledgements We would like to thank those who have shared their insight and on the ground experiences from seeking non-consumptive use protections in the Colorado River Basin and beyond. The input we received from tribal water resources personnel, natural resource departments, and attorneys dealing in these matters was crucial when identifying the key issues and creative solutions addressed herein. To our research assistants who spent hours editing this guide and pouring over footnotes, thank you. Chloe Bourne, Will Davidson, and Casey Strong, once again, your work was invaluable. Finally, we would like to offer a special thank you to our colleagues who volunteered their time to review various segments of this guide. Contents Chapter 1: Introduction .................................................................................................................. - 0 - Protecting Non-Consumptive Uses in the Colorado River Basin and Beyond ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Free PDF Download
    ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST CONTINUE ON TO THE NEXT PAGE FOR YOUR magazineFREE PDF (formerly the Center for Desert Archaeology) is a private 501 (c) (3) nonprofit organization that explores and protects the places of our past across the American Southwest and Mexican Northwest. We have developed an integrated, conservation- based approach known as Preservation Archaeology. Although Preservation Archaeology begins with the active protection of archaeological sites, it doesn’t end there. We utilize holistic, low-impact investigation methods in order to pursue big-picture questions about what life was like long ago. As a part of our mission to help foster advocacy and appreciation for the special places of our past, we share our discoveries with the public. This free back issue of Archaeology Southwest Magazine is one of many ways we connect people with the Southwest’s rich past. Enjoy! Not yet a member? Join today! Membership to Archaeology Southwest includes: » A Subscription to our esteemed, quarterly Archaeology Southwest Magazine » Updates from This Month at Archaeology Southwest, our monthly e-newsletter » 25% off purchases of in-print, in-stock publications through our bookstore » Discounted registration fees for Hands-On Archaeology classes and workshops » Free pdf downloads of Archaeology Southwest Magazine, including our current and most recent issues » Access to our on-site research library » Invitations to our annual members’ meeting, as well as other special events and lectures Join us at archaeologysouthwest.org/how-to-help In the meantime, stay informed at our regularly updated Facebook page! 300 N Ash Alley, Tucson AZ, 85701 • (520) 882-6946 • [email protected] • www.archaeologysouthwest.org ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST SPRING 2014 A QUARTERLY PUBLICATION OF ARCHAEOLOGYmagazine SOUTHWEST VOLUME 28 | NUMBER 2 A Good Place to Live for more than 12,000 Years Archaeology in Arizona's Verde Valley 3 A Good Place to Live for More Than 12,000 Years: Archaeology ISSUE EDITOR: in Arizona’s Verde Valley, Todd W.
    [Show full text]
  • Hopi Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy 0
    Fall 08 Hopi Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy 1 1 Second Mesa Culture Center Website 2016 0 Hopi Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy 1 Hopi Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Hopi Tribe Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy 2018 U.S. Economic Development Administration Prepared by: Hopi Tribe Office of Community Planning and Economic Development and Land Information Systems OCPEDLIS 2 Hopi Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy 3 Hopi Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Hopi Tribal Council Executive Branch Timothy L. Nuvangyaoma, Hopi Tribal Chairman Clark W. Tenakhongva, Hopi Tribe Vice Chairman Wilfred L. Gaseoma, Tribal Treasurer Theresa Lomakema, Tribal Secretary Alfonso Sakeva Jr., Sergeant at Arms Village of Bakabi Village of Kykotsmovi Clifford Qotsaquahu David Talyumptewa Lamar Keevama Jack Harding Jr. Davis Pecusa Phillip Quochytewa Sr. Herman G. Honanie Upper Village of Moencopi Village of Mishongnovi Robert Charley Pansy K. Edmo Leroy Shingoitewa Craig Andrews Bruce Fredericks Annette F. Talayumptewa Philton Talahytewa, Sr. First Mesa Consolidated Villages Albert T. Sinquah Village of Sipalouvi Wallace Youvella, Sr. Norene Kootswatewa Alverna Poneoma Rosa Honani THE FOLLOWING VILLAGES CHOOSE TRADITIONAL GOVERNMENT AND DO NOT HAVE VILLAGE REPRESENTATION ON THE TRIBAL COUNCIL. Village of Shungopavi Village of Oraibi Village of Hotevilla Village of Lower Moencopi 0 Hopi Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy 1 Hopi Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Table of Contents
    [Show full text]
  • General Monitoring and Discovery Plan for the City of Phoenix, Maricopa County, Arizona
    General Monitoring and Discovery Plan for the City of Phoenix, Maricopa County, Arizona Prepared for City of Phoenix City Archaeology Office Parks and Recreation Department Pueblo Grande Museum 4619 E. Washington Street Phoenix, Arizona 85034 Pueblo Grande Museum Project No. 2017-009 Project Report No. 19-120 Desert Archaeology, Inc. Prepared by: T. Kathleen Henderson Submitted by: Patricia Castalia Desert Archaeology, Inc. 3975 N. Tucson Boulevard Tucson, Arizona 85716 July 31, 2020 ABSTRACT Report Title: General Monitoring and Discovery Plan for the City of Phoenix, Maricopa County, Arizona Project Name: General Monitoring and Discovery Plan Update Project Location: Phoenix, Maricopa County, Arizona Project Sponsor: City of Phoenix Sponsor Project Number(s): None (Pueblo Grande Museum No. 2017-009) Lead Agency: City of Phoenix Other Involved Agencies: Arizona State Historic Preservation Office; Arizona State Museum Applicable Regulations: City of Phoenix Historic Preservation Ordinance (Zoning Ordinance Chapter 8); Arizona Antiquities Act (ARS §41-841 et seq.); Arizona state burial laws (ARS §41-844 and ARS §41-865) Funding Source: City Description of the Project/Undertaking: Provide an updated general monitoring and discovery plan for the city of Phoenix Project Area/Area of Potential Effects (APE): Lands inside the boundary of the city of Phoenix and city-owned facilities that lie outside this boundary; acreage to be established by individual projects conducted under this updated plan Legal Description: To be established by individual
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Resource Use of the Flagstaff Area Monuments
    TRADITIONAL RESOURCE USE OF THE FLAGSTAFF AREA MONUMENTS FINAL REPORT Prepared by Rebecca S. Toupal Richard W. Stoffle Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 86721 July 19, 2004 TRADITIONAL RESOURCE USE OF THE FLAGSTAFF AREA MONUMENTS FINAL REPORT Prepared by Rebecca S. Toupal Richard W. Stoffle Shawn Kelly Jill Dumbauld with contributions by Nathan O’Meara Kathleen Van Vlack Fletcher Chmara-Huff Christopher Basaldu Prepared for The National Park Service Cooperative Agreement Number 1443CA1250-96-006 R.W. Stoffle and R.S. Toupal, Principal Investigators Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 86721 July 19, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................iv CHAPTER ONE: STUDY OVERVIEW ..................................................................................1 Project History and Purpose...........................................................................................1 Research Tasks...............................................................................................................1 Research Methods..........................................................................................................2 Organization of the Report.............................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Hopi Arts and Crafts Hopi Pottery
    Contemporary Hopi Arts and Crafts Hopi Pottery Hopi potters draw on a tradition going back centuries. The ancestors of the Hopi made gray utility ware as long ago as A.D. 700. The ancient potters developed black on white styles, black on red, and finally polychromes. In the late 1800s, outsiders began to appreciate the artistry of Hopi potters. This new demand sparked what has been called the revival period for Hopi pottery. The ancient potters passed their skills on to succeeding generations, many of whom are Hopi potters today. Although First Mesa is the most well-known for its pottery, Hopi potters can be found throughout the Hopi mesas. All authentic Hopi pottery is handmade by the coil and scrape technique. Hopi potters do not use a pottery wheel or make mold-poured pottery. They use the same techniques as their ancestors, hand-painting the designs with yucca leaf brushes and using natural materials provided by their environment. The pots are then fired in open firing areas. To learn about Hopi pottery, we suggest you read some of the fine books available about this ancient art. They are listed in our Recommended Reading List. History The Hopi call their ancestors, Hisatsinom, "People of Long Ago." The public and most anthropologists refer to these people as the "Anasazi," a word that has become popular in the general literature. Early Hisatsinom are called the Basketmaker people. The Basketmakers were a hunting and gathering people who became increasingly sedentary as their reliance on agriculture increased. As early as A.D. 700, the Basketmaker people began making plain pottery.
    [Show full text]