DOCSLIB.ORG

State District Szombathely PLC

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
State District Szombathely PLC Hungary 2020 State district Szombathely PLC Area HUNTING AREA: 5,000 ha Szentpéterfa: NATURAL FEATURES: approx. 80 % woodland ACCOMMODATION: Hunting lodge Szentpéterfa cl. II, Area HUNTING AREA: 7,000 ha Kõszeg: NATURAL FEATURES: approx. 80 % woodland ACCOMMODATION: Hunting lodge Cák cl. Ib, Area HUNTING AREA: 15,000 ha, 500 ha fenced Szentgotthárd: NATURAL FEATURES: approx. 75 % woodland ACCOMMODATION: Hunting lodge Ivánc old cl. I, 3 double-, 1 triple room Hunting lodge Ivánc new cl. II, 2 double-, 1 triple room Hunting lodge Szakonyfalu cl. III, 4 double-, 1 triple room Hunting lodge Ivánc Hunting lodge Szakonyfalu Area HUNTING AREA: 15,000 ha Káld-Hidegkút: NATURAL FEATURES: approx. 70 % woodland ACCOMMODATION: Hunting lodge Hidgkút cl. I, 5 double rooms, 1 apt. Hunting lodge Csipkerek cl.I, 4 Double rooms Hunting lodge Hidegkút Hunting lodge Csipkerek - 2 - Annual shooting list Species Red Deer 1,000 Roe Deer 700 Mouflon 20 Fallow Deer 100 Wild Boar 1,700 Rut time Stag: Roebuck: Mouflon Ram: Fallwo Buck: 08.09. 25.09. 20.07 10.08. 01.11. 25.11 10.10. 25.10. Art of hunting Stalk-, sit and watch & horse cart, driven hunt in free and fenced area Forestry Kõszeg Forestry Szentgotthárd Forestry Káld Forestry Szentpéterfa - 3 - Prices 2020 Red Deer Hunting Season: Old, big Trophy Stag: 01.09. - 31.10. Cull Stag: 01.09. - 31.01. Hind, Hind Calf: 01.09. - 31.01. Calf: 01.09. - 28.02. Chargeable weight: Skull without lower jaw 24 hours after boiling. The trophy includes the fangs, which are presented to the hunter in the hunting ground. If you do not receive them automatically, please ask your professional hunter in the hunting ground directly.The trophy includes the fangs. Trophy fees Antlers weight in kg Price in EUR EUR / 10 g Red Stag Up to 2,99 EUR 300 From 3,00 3,99 EUR 500 From 4,00 4,99 EUR 700 From 5,00 EUR 1,100 + EUR 7 / 10 g From 6,00 EUR 1,800 + EUR 8 / 10 g From 7,00 EUR 2,600 + EUR 9 / 10 g From 8,00 EUR 3,500 + EUR 10 / 10 g From 8,50 EUR 4,000 + EUR 18 / 10 g From 9,00 EUR 4,900 + EUR 18 / 10 g From 9,50 EUR 5,800 + EUR 34 / 10 g From 10,00 EUR 7,500 + EUR 50 / 10 g From 10,50 EUR 10,000 + EUR 42 / 10 g From 11,00 - EUR 12,100 + EUR 48 / 10 g Brocket EUR 130 Hind / Hind Calf / Calf EUR 70 Min. Caliber: 7 x 64 or 30.06 optimal would be 300 Win.Mag. or Blaser Mag, 8x57, 8x68 up to 9,3x62, 338 Win.Mag. or Blaser Mag. Wounded Stag: 50 % of trophy fee for trophy weight as estimated by the professional hunter Wounded Hind, Hind Calf, Calf: 50 % of trophy fee - 4 - Prices 2020 Roe Deer Hunting Season: Roebuck: 15.04. - 30.09. Doe, Fawn: 01.10. - 28.02. Antler weight: Antlers are weighed 24 hours after boiling with small skull (with nasal septum, frontal bone and nasal bone). If desired, antlers can also be weighed respectively charged with big skull. In this case you have to accept the estimated weight deduction of the Trophy Assessment Commission. Trophy fees Antler weight in g Price in EUR EUR / g Roebuck Up to 149 EUR 125 From 150 EUR 150 + EUR 1 / g From 250 EUR 250 + EUR 6 / g From 300 EUR 550 + EUR 9 / g From 350 EUR 1,000 + EUR 14 / g From 400 EUR 1,700 + EUR 23 / g From 450 - EUR 2,850 + EUR 38 / g Doe / Fawn EUR 30 Wounded Roebuck: 50 % of trophy fee for trophy weight as estimated by the professional hunter Wounded Doe, Fawn: 50 % of trophy fee Prices 2020 Fallow Deer Hunting Season: Old, big Trophy Stag: 01.10. - 30.11. Cull Fallow Buck: 01.10. - 28.02. Hind, Hind Calf: 01.10. - 31.01. Calf: 01.10. - 28.02. Chargeable weight: Skull without lower jaw 24 hours after boiling. Trophy fees Antler weight in kg Price in EUR EUR / 10 g Fallow Buck Up to 1,49 EUR 300 From 1,50 EUR 450 From 2,00 EUR 570 + EUR 8 / 10 g From 2,50 EUR 970 + EUR 11 / 10 g From 3,00 EUR 1,520 + EUR 12 / 10 g From 3,50 EUR 2,120 + EUR 26 / 10 g From 4,00 EUR 3,420 + EUR 50 / 10 g From 4,50 - EUR 5,920 + EUR 74 / 10 g Brocket EUR 130 Hind / Hind Calf / Calf EUR 80 Min. Caliber: 7 x 64 or 30.06, optimal would be 300 Win.Mag. or Blaser Mag, 8x57, 8x68 up to 9,3x62, 338 Win.Mag. or Blaser Mag. Wounded Fallow Buck: 50 % of trophy fee for trophy weight as estimated by the professional hunter Wounded Hind, Hind Calf, Calf: 50 % of trophy fee - 5 - Prices 2020 Mouflon Hunting Season: Mouflon Ram: 01.09. 28.02. Ewe: 01.09. 31.01. Lamb: 01.09. 28.02. Calculation of Charges: Average length, measured along the outside curve oft he horns Trophy fees Horn length in cm Price in EUR EUR / cm Mouflon Ram Up to 59,99 EUR 890 From 60,00 EUR 890 + EUR 64 / cm From 70,00 EUR 1,530 + EUR 95 / cm From 80,00 EUR 2,480 + EUR 170 / cm From 90,00 - EUR 4,180 + EUR 195 / cm Mouflon Ewe / Lamb EUR 80 Min. Caliber: 270 Win.Mag, 7 mm Rem. Mag, 7 x 64 or. 30.06, optimal would be 300 Win. Mag. or Blaser Mag, 8x57, 8x68 Wounded Ram: 50 % of trophy fee for horn length as estimated by the professional hunter Wounded Ewe, Lamb: 50 % of trophy fee Prices 2020 Individual Wild Boar Hunt Hunting Season: Tusker, Sow, Yearling, Piglet, All-year Assessment: Average tusk length, measured along the outside curve of tusks. Trophy fees Tusk length in cm Price in EUR Price / mm Tusker From 12,01 14,00 EUR 525 From 14,01 16,00 EUR 670 + EUR 21 / mm From 16,01 18,00 EUR 1090 + EUR 27 / mm From 18,01 20,00 EUR 1,630 + EUR 32 / mm From 20,01 22,00 EUR 2,270 + EUR 47 / mm From 22,01 EUR 3,210 + EUR 72 / mm Sow (gutted over 50 kg) EUR 370 and Tusker up to 12 cm Sow (gutted 50 kg) EUR 350 Yearling (gutted 20 - 49,90 kg) EUR 160 Piglet (gutted up to 19,90 kg) EUR 50 Min. Caliber: 7 x 64 or. 30.06 optimal would be 300 Win.Mag. or Blaser Mag., 8x57, 8x68 up to 9,3x62, 338 Win.Mag. or Blaser Mag. Wounded Tusker: EUR 200,- / piece Wounded Sow, Yearling, Piglet: 50 % of Trophy fee - 6 - Group Wild Boar Hunt Driven Sow Hunt: Driven hunt with hounds and beaters, group size max. 25 hunters. Small Driven Hunt: Driven hunt with beaters, but without hounds, group size max. 25 hunters. Wild Boar, Doe and Fox are hunted. Does, that is Hind, Hind Calf and Calf, are included in the daily bag, trophy fees are charged according to Individual Hunt prices. Daily rate: EUR 250 / day / hunter Over 20 hunters EUR 3,750 - / day / group Trophy fee in free range Tusk length in cm Price in EUR Tusker Up To 14,95 EUR 640 From 15,00 16,95 EUR 850 From 17,00 18,95 EUR 1,380 From 19,00 EUR 2,000 Sow (gutted 50 kg) EUR 350 Yearling, Piglet (gutted up to 50 kg) EUR 160 Red Deer - Hind / Calf EUR 100 Fallow Deer Hind / Calf EUR 80 Mouflon Ewe / Lamp EUR 80 Roed Deer - Doe / Fawn EUR 30 Wounded and missing: not charged Trophy fee fenced area Tusk length in cm Price in EUR Tusker Up To 14,95 EUR 640 From 15,00 16,95 EUR 850 From 17,00 18,95 EUR 1,380 From 19,00 20,95 EUR 2,000 Over 21,00 EUR 2,200 Sow (gutted 50 kg) EUR 350 Yearling, Piglet (gutted up to 50 kg) EUR 160 Red Deer - Hind / Calf EUR 100 Fallow Deer Hind / Calf EUR 80 Mouflon Ewe / Lamp EUR 80 Roed Deer - Doe / Fawn EUR 30 Wounded and missing: not charged Group hunt for big game: Group size max. 25 hunters. The package price refers to wild boar. If red deer, fallow deer or mouflons are hunted, they are taken into consideration with a 0.7 multiplier. If not at least 20 hunters have taken part in the hunt, then EUR 500,- / hunter surcharge must be paid for the unoccupied places above the all-inclusive price. If there are 17 hunters or less, the hunt will be cancelled. Tableau EUR / group / day Up to 10 EUR 5,000 10,1 20 EUR 8,000 20,1 30 EUR 11,000 30,1 40 EUR 15,000 40,1 - 50 EUR 19,000 over 50,1 piece EUR 23,000 - 7 - Accommodation costs Night/day/person Hunting lodge Hidegkút for 1-2 persons: Apt. double used EUR 60 Apt. single used EUR 12 Apt. triple used EUR 51 Hunting lodge Hidegkút, Ivánc cl. I double room EUR 51 Hunting lodge Csipkerek cl. I double room EUR 50 Hunting lodge Cák cl. Ib double room EUR 44 Hunting lodge Szentpéterfa double room EUR 31 Hunting lodge Ivánc cl. II double room EUR 44 Hunting lodge Szakonyfalu, Kõszeg cl. III double room EUR 51 Single supplement for all hunting lodges EUR 7 Extra bed for all hunting lodges EUR 15 Catering costs Day / person Breakfast cl I EUR 12 / Portion Breakfast cl.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • VAS COUNTY Final
    WP T1 DELIVERABLE T1.4.1 Urban Innovation Action Plans (UIAPs) 05 2019 VAS COUNTY Final Page i Project information Project Index Number: CE677 Project Acronym: URBAN INNO Project Title: Utilizing innovation potential of urban ecosystems Website: http://www.interreg-central.eu/Content.Node/URBAN-INNO.html Start Date of the Project:1 st June 2016 Duration: 36 Months Document Control page Deliverable Title: D.T1.4.1 – Urban Innovation Action Plan (UIAPs) _ VAS COUNTY Lead Contractor of the bwcon GmbH (subcontractor of PP9 PBN) Deliverable: Authors: bwcon GmbH PP9 – Pannon Business Mátyás Lazáry, Zoltán Molnár Contributors: Network PP3 – inno AG Luc Schmerber, Kirsten Petersen Contractual Delivery 05.2019 Date: Actual Delivery Date: 05.2019 Page ii Content EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND – OVERVIEW OF THE URBAN ECOSYSTEM .................................................................. 3 1 Characteristics of the urban innovation ecosystems – regional background ............................. 3 1.1 Research organizations located in the county ...................................................................... 5 1.2 Educational institutions in the county .................................................................................. 5 2 Socio-economic and SWOT analysis of the urban innovation ecosystem ................................... 7 2.1 Socioeconomic analysis ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FOUNDATION Regional Analysis PBN ENG V2
    HUNGARIAN REGIONAL ANALYSIS BUILDING REGIONAL RESILIENCE TO INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURAL CHANGE West-Transdanubian Region - Hungary Hungarian Partner Project Partner: Pannon Business Network Association Website Twitter https://www.interregeurope.eu/foundation/ @FOUNDATION_EU CONTENT INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... - 2 - Foundation Project partners ..................................................................................................... - 2 - Hungary – West-Transdanubian Region ................................................................................... - 3 - Regional Population and Industrial Statistics ........................................................................... - 6 - Economic Resilience across Europe ......................................................................................... - 12 - Hungry (Győr) – NUTS2 Nyugat-Dunántúl .............................................................................. - 13 - Industrial Restructuring in the West-Transdanubian Region .................................................. - 16 - Key policy players in the West-Transdanubian Region ........................................................... - 22 - Economic Restructuring – Case Study ..................................................................................... - 28 - INDUSTRY IN TRANSITION - CASE STUDY .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Szombathely Zalaszentiván
    Railway network development plans in West-Hungary GYSEV & the SETA project Szilárd Kövesdi, CEO of GYSEV Contents of presentation About GYSEV Connection between GYSEV and SETA GYSEV developments (planned and ongoing) Who we are 1872 Baron Victor von Erlanger won concession contract to construct a rail line between Győr-Sopron- Neufeld/Leitha 1876 Starting year of rail operation 1921 At the end of the 1st World War, part of the lines became Austrian territory (border- redrawing) 1923 Hungarian-Austrian state contract allowed the operation with Hungarian State’s major ownership Network and service area GYSEV rail network till 2001 - Győr-Sopron-Ebenfurth - Fertőszentmiklós-Neusiedl Network and service area GYSEV rail network from 2001 - Győr-Sopron-Ebenfurth - Fertőszentmiklós-Neusiedl - Sopron-Szombathely Network and service area GYSEV rail network from 2006 - Győr-Sopron-Ebenfurth - Fertőszentmiklós-Neusiedl - Sopron-Szombathely - Szombathely-Körmend- Szentgotthárd Network and service area GYSEVData about yearrail 2012: network fromFreight transport 2011: 5 M tons - LogisticsGyőr: -270.000Sopron tons moved-Ebenfurth - NumberFertőszentmiklós of trains operated: -Neusiedl - PassengerSopron: -Szombathely121,000 train Freight: 21,000 train - PassengerSzombathely Public transport-Körmend: - Szentgotthárd3.39 M passenger (HU) 1.39 M passenger (AT) - OwnPorpác property- linesCsorna: 116 km- Rajka Lines with property - management:Szombathely 387 kmZalaszentiván - StaffKörmend: 2,000 employees-Zalalövő (HU) - Szombathely 150 employees -(AT)Kőszeg
    [Show full text]
  • How to Establish and Operate Cross-Border Public
    Transport Geography Papers of Polish Geographical Society 2019, 22(1), 52-65 DOI 10.4467/2543859XPKG.19.006.10926 Received: 01.03.2019 Received in revised form: 21.03.2019 Accepted: 21.03.2019 Published: 29.03.2019 HOW TO ESTABLISH AND OPERATE CROSS-BORDER PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN A PERIPHERAL RURAL AREA? THE EXAMPLE OF THE CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN SECTION OF THE BORDER BETWEEN AUSTRIA AND HUNGARY Jak zorganizować i zarządzać systemem transgranicznego transportu publicznego na peryferyjnych obszarach wiejskich? Przykład środkowego i południowego pogranicza austriacko-węgierskiego Vilmos Oszter KTI Institute for Transport Sciences Non Profit Ltd., Than Károly 3-5, Budapest, 1119, Hungary e-mail: [email protected] Citation: Oszter V., 2019, How to establish and operate cross-border public transport in a peripheral rural area? The example of the Central and Southern section of the border between Austria and Hungary, Prace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG, 22(1), 52-65. Abstract: Based on the Interreg Central Europe Territorial cooperation Programme’s CONNECT2CE project the current paper analyses the existing passenger traffic flow across the border which is among the TOP10 busiest border section of the EU. It provides an overview of the main socio-economic characteristic of the peripheral border area and identifies the factors which are leading to the continuous growth of cross-border traffic. Based on previous research and travel surveys it collects the past service attempts offered to tap the growing cross-border travel demand. It also presents the most recent passenger counts and relational (Origin-Destination O-D) ticketing statistic in order to get precise knowledge about the usage level of the existing service which helps to understand the rapidly changing mobility patterns and spatial structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Enykk 2019 02 03
    MENETRENDI ÉRTESÍTÉS A Hivatalos Autóbusz Menetrend VAS MEGYEI TERÜLETI KÖTETÉHEZ ÉNYKK ÉSZAKNYUGAT-MAGYARORSZÁGI KÖZLEKEDÉSI KÖZPONT ZRT. 9700 Szombathely, Körmendi út 92. ● Tel.: 94/517-600 ● Fax.: 94/517-625 ● E-mail: [email protected] ● www.enykk.hu ÉNYKK Zrt. – 02–03 / 2018-2019.-VA Érvényes: 2019. június 15-től Értesítjük a Tisztelt Utazóközönséget, hogy fenti időponttól az alábbi módosítások lépnek életbe. TÁVOLSÁGI (ORSZÁGOS és REGIONÁLIS) JÁRATOK MÓDOSÍTÁSAI 1642 NAGYKANIZSA – ZALAEGERSZEG – SZOMBATHELY – SOPRON országos autóbuszvonalon 814 számú naponta közlekedő járat 5 perccel később indul és Szombathelyig menetidő korrekcióval közlekedik, további menetrendje változatlan: Sopron 15.10, Kőszeg 16.34, Szombathely 17.10, Vasvár 17.47, Zalaegerszeg 18.30, Nagykanizsa 19.20 1667 SZOMBATHELY – VASVÁR – ZALAEGERSZEG – NAGYKANIZSA regionális autóbuszvonalon 7 számú (Szombathely L13.20, Zalaegerszeg L14.30, Nagykanizsa L15.30) a hetek utolsó iskolai előadási napján közlekedő járat leáll. 1668 SZOMBATHELY – ZALAEGERSZEG – KAPOSVÁR – PÉCS országos autóbuszvonalon 7 számú (Szombathely, aut. áll. M19.10, Pécs, aut. áll. M23.50) a ’hetek első iskolai előadási napját megelőző munkaszüneti napokon’ jelzéssel közlekedő járat leáll. 2 számú (Pécs, aut. áll. m04.00, Szombathely, aut. áll. m8.35) ’munkaszüneti napot követően a hetek első iskolai előadási napján’ jelzéssel közlekedő járat leáll. 1669 LENTI – KÖRMEND – SZOMBATHELY regionális autóbuszvonalon 111 számú (Lenti L8.30, Szombathely L9.50) a hetek utolsó iskolai előadási napján közlekedő járat ’tanév tartama alatt a hetek utolsó munkanapján, valamint szombati iskolai előadási napokon’ jelzéssel 13.00 órakor indulva közlekedik: Lenti 413.00, Szombathely 414.20 VAS MEGYÉT ÉRINTŐ REGIONÁLIS MÓDOSÍTÁSOK 6277 ZALAEGERSZEG – ZALALÖVŐ – ŐRISZENTPÉTER regionális autóbuszvonalon 618 számú (Őriszentpéter .6.10, Zalalövő .6.35, Zalaegerszeg .7.10) munkanapi járat megáll .6.56 órakor a ’Bagod, aut.
    [Show full text]
  • Szombathely’S Economy
    Economy & investment At the intersection of Austria, the Czech Republic, Hungary Excellent infrastructure and labour culture, a highly qualified workforce, high-level professional and Slovakia, centrope is emer- knowledge and the advantageous location of the town have been crucial for the development of ging as a new and prospering Szombathely’s economy. The largest industrial area of the town is Claudius Industrial Park with an www.szombathely.hu transnational region, home to area of 185 hectares and a further 31.1 hectares available for future utilisation. The business park is 6.5 million people. Since its incep- mostly populated by manufacturers of vehicle parts, electronics, informatics and the processing in- tion in 2003, political leaders of dustry, creating high production value and applying high-end technologies, as well as by commercial Szombathely 16 regions and cities have been hypermarket chains. 168 enterprises operate here, with an overall sales revenue of HUF 80 billion committed to strengthening the in 2010. Szombathely expects that investors will also make use of a complex of 10 buildings with centrope area of co-operation. railway connection and public utilities situated on 20 hectares of land at the town centre. For more information see www.centrope.com Urban development Szombathely managed to draw significant EU funds for its development projects, which has fundamentally changed the image of the town centre, contributed to enriching the standing of this “Hun- garian Town of Culture” and helped to reinterpret the tourism treasures inherited from the Szombathely’s Roman past. As a result of these developments, billions of HUF were channelled into the town to set up meet Szombathely.
    [Show full text]
  • Objective Analysis and Ranking of Hungarian Cities, with Different Classification Techniques, Part 2: Analysis
    ACTA CLIMATOLOGICA ET CHOROLOGICA Universitatis Szegediensis, Tomus 40-41, 2007, 91-100. OBJECTIVE ANALYSIS AND RANKING OF HUNGARIAN CITIES, WITH DIFFERENT CLASSIFICATION TECHNIQUES, PART 2: ANALYSIS L. MAKRA and Z. SÜMEGHY Department of Climatology and Landscape Ecology, University of Szeged, P.O.Box 653, 6701 Szeged, Hungary E-mail: [email protected] Összefoglalás – A tanulmány célja, hogy a magyarországi városokat és megyéket környezetminőségük és környe- zeti tudatosságuk szintje alapján osztályozza. Bemutatjuk a magyarországi városok és megyek rangsorát azok „Green Cities Index”, illetve a „Green Counties Index” értékeinek összevetésével. Az 1. részben (Makra and Sü- meghy, 2007) bemutatott módszertan szerint a városokat, illetve megyéket eltérő klasszifikációs technikák szerint osztályoztuk, s elemeztük az osztályozás hatékonyságát. Azonban ezek egyike sem adott elfogadható eredményt sem a városokra, sem a megyékre. E három algoritmus paraméterei alapján egyik clusterezési eljárás során sem ta- láltunk elfogadható cluster-szerkezetet. A fanny algoritmus alkalmazásával kapott clusterek – jóllehet gyenge a szerkezetük – kiterjedt és jól körülhatárolható térségeket jeleznek Magyarországon, melyek adott földrajzi objektu- mokkal jól körülírhatók. Summary – The aim of the study was to rank and classify Hungarian cities and counties according to their environmental quality and level of environmental awareness. The rankings of the Hungarian cities and counties are based on their „Green Cities Index” and „Green Counties Index” values. According to the methodology presented in Part 1 (Makra and Sümeghy, 2007), cities and counties were grouped with different classification techniques and the efficacy of the classification was analysed. However, these did not give acceptable results for the cities, nor for the counties. According to the parameters of the here-mentioned three algorithms, no reasonable structures were found in any clustering.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Urban Regions in Hungary
    Functional Urban Regions aIn Hungary Laszlo Lacko G orgy Enyedi, and Gy6rgy k&zegfa lvl CP-78-4 I JULY 1978 FUNCTIONAL URBAN REGIONS IN HUNGARY LLzl6 Lackb*, Gyorgy Enyedi**, and Gyorgy K6szegfalvi*** CP-78-4 July 1978 *Deputy Director, Division for Physical Planning and Regional Development, Ministry of Building and Urban Development, Hungary **Head, Regional Development Department, Institute of Geography, Hungarian Academy of Sciences ***Deputy Director, Scientific and Design Institute of Town Construction and Planning, Budapest Views expressed herein are those of the contributors and not necessarily those of their institutions or of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. The Institute assumes full responsibility for minor editorial changes, and trusts that these modifications have not abused the sense of the writers' ideas. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria Copyright @ 1978 IIASA All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Preface One of the principal objectives of IIASA's research Task on Human Settlement Systems: Development Processes and Strategies is to delin- eate functional urban regions in the industrially advanced nations. These regions collectively exhaust the respective national territories, and usually consist of an urban core area and its functionally related hinterland area. The organization of small-area data based on these statistical re- gions will provide a more satisfactory basis for comparative analysis of the nature and significance of spatial differences in the economic and demographic structure, as well as evolution, of human settlement systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Border Cooperation Slovenia-Hungary 2007-2013
    Objective 3 – European Territorial Cooperati on Operational Programme Cross-border Cooperation Slovenia-Hungary 2007-2013 CCI NUMBER: 2007CB163PO053 December 2007 As approved by Commission Decision No C(2007)6511 as of 20/12/2007 OBJECTIVE OF THE PROGRAMME TO PLACE THE CROSS -BORDER REGION ON THE EUROPEAN MAP AS A CULTURAL , HEALTH AND NATURAL PRECIOUS AREA FOR LIVING AND WORKING . Operational Programme Slovenia - Hungary 2007-2013 page 2/65 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 7 1.1 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................... 7 1.1.1 Previous experiences with the implementation of cross-border activities ............ 7 1.2 RELEVANT STRATEGIC DOCUMENTS AND REGULATIONS ............................................ 7 1.3 PROGRAMMING PROCESS .......................................................................................10 2 SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE PROGRAMME AREA .................................12 2.1 IDENTIFICATION OF COOPERATION AREA ..................................................................12 2.2 GEOGRAPHICAL DESCRIPTION OF COOPERATION AREA ............................................15 2.3 DEMOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................16 2.3.1 National and Ethnic Minorities ...........................................................................17 2.4 HUMAN RESOURCES
    [Show full text]
  • Extreme Small Villages in Hungary and Transylvania – a Comparative Study
    EXTREME SMALL VILLAGES IN HUNGARY AND TRANSYLVANIA – A COMPARATIVE STUDY Péter BAJMÓCY – András BALOGH University of Szeged, Department of Economic and Human Geography, H-6720, Szeged, Egyetem u. 2. E-mail: [email protected] University of West-Hungary, Department of Human Geography, H-9700 Szombathely, Károlyi Gáspár Tér 4. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The urbanization trends of Hungary and Romania were similar during the last decades, after 40-50 years of mass-urbanization the phase of suburbanization started. In both phases we could see out- migration from villages, especially from small ones. Because of this large-scale out-migration the residual population of these villages became older, so we can see out-migration and natural decrease parallel nowadays. In some cases the population decline of these small villages became critical; the population of more than 150 villages in the two countries is less than 50 by the census of 2001/2002. Because the administrative structure of the two countries is different, we can see those villages, which were independent administrative units by the 1910 Austro-Hungarian Census irrespectively of these villages are administrative units (some of the Hungarian small villages) or not (the other part of Hungarian, most of the Romanian villages) nowadays. The area of investigation is Hungary and the 16 counties of Romania, west from the Carpathians. We could have a look at the ways, the types of decline by countries, by the reason of underpopulation, by ethnicity and by size of these settlements. Keywords: depopulated settlements, regional differences, urbanization, out-migration, loss of functionality, ethnicity 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Activity of the Hungarian Committee on Geographical Names
    E/CONF.105/145/CRP.145 28 July 2017 Original: English Eleventh United Nations Conference on the Standardization of Geographical Names New York, 8-17 August 2017 Item 5 of the provisional agenda* Reports by Governments on the situation in their countries and on the progress made in the standardization of geographical names since the Tenth Conference (for distribution only). Report of Hungary 2012–2017 Submitted by Hungary ** _______________________ *E/CONF.105/1 * Prepared by the Hungarian Committee on Geographical Names – Gábor Gercsák, Tamás Koós, Gábor Mikesy and Béla Pokoly A. Jurisdiction on Geographical Names A/1. Jurisdiction As regards new legal measures following 2012 and affecting geographical names in Hungary, these measures had direct impact only on the existing administrative division and the system of postal addresses. 1.) The Hungarian Committee on Geographical Names continues to work on the legal basis of Gov. Decree No. 303/2007. (XI. 14.) Korm., on the establishment and recording of official geographical names in Hungary, supervised by the Ministry of Agriculture. 2.) Act. No. XLVI. of 2012 on land surveying and mapping activity confirmed that creation, continuance and data service of Database Gazetteer of Hungary has been a basic state task, which has been provided by the public authority for land surveying and remote sensing. This public authority was the Institute of Geodesy, Cartography and Remote Sensing (FÖMI) until the end of 2016, which continues its work as the Department of Geodesy, Remote Sensing and Land Offices of Government Office of the Capital City Budapest from 1 January 2017. 3.) Act No. CLXVII stipulates that since 1 January 2013 municipalities may not include in the names of streets, squares or public institutions the proper names of persons participating in establishing, forming or maintaining any 20th century totalitarian political system, or any phrase or organization that can directly be associated with such a system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hungarian Urban Network at the End of the Second Millenium
    CENTRE FOR REGIONAL STUDIES OF HUNGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES DISCUSSION PAPERS No. 27 The Hungarian Urban Network at the End of the Second Millennium by Pál BELUSZKY Series editor Zoltán GÁL Pécs 1999 Publishing of this paper is supported by the Research Fund of the Centre for Regional Studies, Hungary ISSN 0238–2008 © 1999 by Centre for Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences Technical editor: Ilona Csapó, Zoltán Gál Typeset by Centre for Regional Studies of HAS Printed in Hungary by Sümegi Nyomdaipari, Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Ltd., Pécs CONTENTS 1 Introduction / 7 2 A brief introduction to urban development in Hungary / 9 2.1 Roman preliminaries / 9 2.2 Urban development in the medieval Hungary (10th–15th century) / 9 2.3 “Turning back” to the East / 13 2.4 The fragile frame of bourgeois development – the Hungarian urban network in 1850–1950 / 19 2.5 The Hungarian urban network between the two World Wars / 24 2.6 An ambiguous urban boom – the Hungarian towns in the “Socialist” era / 27 2.7 Conditions for urban development after 1990 / 32 3 The contemporary urban network of Hungary / 36 3.1 Towns, urbanisation level, proportion of the urban population / 36 3.2 The hierarchy of the Hungarian towns / 43 3.3 Hinterlands of the towns / 53 3.4 Functional types of the Hungarian towns / 56 4 Urban types in Hungary / 60 4.1 Budapest / 60 4.2 Regional centres / 66 4.3 County seats / 68 4.4 Middle towns, with central functions and with industry / 69 4.5 Small towns with central functions, (mostly) with industry dominant in size
    [Show full text]