DOCSLIB.ORG

Cross-Border Cooperation Slovenia-Hungary 2007-2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cross-Border Cooperation Slovenia-Hungary 2007-2013 Objective 3 – European Territorial Cooperati on Operational Programme Cross-border Cooperation Slovenia-Hungary 2007-2013 CCI NUMBER: 2007CB163PO053 December 2007 As approved by Commission Decision No C(2007)6511 as of 20/12/2007 OBJECTIVE OF THE PROGRAMME TO PLACE THE CROSS -BORDER REGION ON THE EUROPEAN MAP AS A CULTURAL , HEALTH AND NATURAL PRECIOUS AREA FOR LIVING AND WORKING . Operational Programme Slovenia - Hungary 2007-2013 page 2/65 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 7 1.1 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................... 7 1.1.1 Previous experiences with the implementation of cross-border activities ............ 7 1.2 RELEVANT STRATEGIC DOCUMENTS AND REGULATIONS ............................................ 7 1.3 PROGRAMMING PROCESS .......................................................................................10 2 SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE PROGRAMME AREA .................................12 2.1 IDENTIFICATION OF COOPERATION AREA ..................................................................12 2.2 GEOGRAPHICAL DESCRIPTION OF COOPERATION AREA ............................................15 2.3 DEMOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................16 2.3.1 National and Ethnic Minorities ...........................................................................17 2.4 HUMAN RESOURCES ...............................................................................................17 2.4.1 Labour Market ...................................................................................................17 2.4.2 Education, Research and Development ............................................................19 2.5 CULTURE ...............................................................................................................20 2.6 HEALTH ..................................................................................................................20 2.7 ECONOMIC DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................21 2.7.1 Agriculture and Rural Development ...................................................................22 2.7.2 Industry .............................................................................................................23 2.7.3 SMEs ................................................................................................................24 2.7.4 Services ............................................................................................................24 2.7.5 Tourism .............................................................................................................24 2.8 INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES ................................................25 2.9 ENERGY .................................................................................................................26 2.10 TRANSPORT ...........................................................................................................26 2.11 ENVIRONMENT AND NATURE PROTECTION ...............................................................27 2.11.1 Nature Protection ..........................................................................................27 2.11.2 Water Treatment ...........................................................................................28 2.12 LOCAL AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT .....................................................................29 3 SWOT ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................30 4 PROGRAMME STRATEGY .........................................................................................32 4.1 STRATEGIC PREMISES ............................................................................................32 4.2 MAIN PRINCIPLES ...................................................................................................32 4.3 STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE ...........................................................................................33 5 JUSTIFICATION FOR THE SELECTED PROGRAMME PRIORITY AXES .................35 6 PROGRAMME PRIORITY AXES AND ACTIVITY FIELDS ..........................................36 6.1 INCREASE THE ATTRACTIVENESS OF THE COOPERATION AREA ..................................37 6.1.1 Development of Joint Tourist Destination ..........................................................37 6.1.2 Preservation and Development of Culture .........................................................37 6.1.3 Improvement of Cross-border Traffic Connections ............................................38 6.2 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................................38 6.2.1 Regional Development Cooperation ..................................................................38 6.2.2 Preventative Health Care ..................................................................................38 6.2.3 Environment Protection and Management ........................................................39 6.2.4 Efficient Energy Use ..........................................................................................39 6.3 TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE .........................................................................................39 6.4 HORIZONTAL ACTIVITIES .........................................................................................40 6.4.1 Horizontal Objectives ........................................................................................40 Operational Programme Slovenia - Hungary 2007-2013 page 3/65 6.4.2 Description of Horizontal Activities ....................................................................40 The influence of horizontal activities: ............................................................................40 7 BENEFICIARIES ..........................................................................................................42 8 INDICATORS ...............................................................................................................43 9 FINANCING PLAN .......................................................................................................45 10 ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME ............................................46 10.1 ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURES FOR THE PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION ...................47 10.1.1 Administrative structures ...............................................................................47 10.2 PROCEDURAL REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION (PROCEDURAL ORGANISATION ) ............................................................................................51 10.2.1 Lead beneficiary (Lead partner principle) ......................................................51 10.2.2 Project life cycle ............................................................................................52 11 PUBLICITY AND COMMUNICATION ..........................................................................58 12 EX-ANTE EVALUATION ..............................................................................................60 12.1 PROCESS AND CONTENT OF EX -ANTE EVALUATION ....................................................60 12.2 SUMMARY OF THE CONCLUSIONS AND FURTHER RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EACH KEY COMPONENT OF EX -ANTE EVALUATION .................................................................................61 12.2.1 Appraisal of the socio-economic analysis and the relevance of the strategy to the needs identified.......................................................................................................61 12.2.2 Evaluation of the rationale of the strategy and its consistency .......................61 12.2.3 Appraisal of the coherence of the strategy with regional and national policies and the community strategic guidelines ........................................................................62 12.2.4 Evaluation of expected results and likely impacts ..........................................62 12.2.5 Appraisal of the proposed implementation systems .......................................63 12.3 ACTIONS TAKEN TO IMPROVE THE PROCESS ACCORDING TO EX-ANTE RECOMMENDATIONS ...........................................................................................................64 ANNEX: CATEGORISATION OF FUNDS ...........................................................................65 Operational Programme Slovenia - Hungary 2007-2013 page 4/65 TABLES, MAPS AND SCHEMES TABLES Table 1: Preparation of OP .................................................................................................. 10 Table 2: Cooperation area ................................................................................................... 16 Table 3: Change in the number of inhabitants and population density (inhabitants per km 2) 16 Table 4: Natural population fluctuation and distribution of inhabitants by age (%) in the cooperation area ................................................................................................................. 17 Table 5: Persons in employment and employment structure by education attainment ......... 18 Table 6: Unemployment structure by sex, age and education attainment of unemployed .... 18 Table 7: Education attainment of inhabitants
Load more

Recommended publications
  • VAS COUNTY Final
    WP T1 DELIVERABLE T1.4.1 Urban Innovation Action Plans (UIAPs) 05 2019 VAS COUNTY Final Page i Project information Project Index Number: CE677 Project Acronym: URBAN INNO Project Title: Utilizing innovation potential of urban ecosystems Website: http://www.interreg-central.eu/Content.Node/URBAN-INNO.html Start Date of the Project:1 st June 2016 Duration: 36 Months Document Control page Deliverable Title: D.T1.4.1 – Urban Innovation Action Plan (UIAPs) _ VAS COUNTY Lead Contractor of the bwcon GmbH (subcontractor of PP9 PBN) Deliverable: Authors: bwcon GmbH PP9 – Pannon Business Mátyás Lazáry, Zoltán Molnár Contributors: Network PP3 – inno AG Luc Schmerber, Kirsten Petersen Contractual Delivery 05.2019 Date: Actual Delivery Date: 05.2019 Page ii Content EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND – OVERVIEW OF THE URBAN ECOSYSTEM .................................................................. 3 1 Characteristics of the urban innovation ecosystems – regional background ............................. 3 1.1 Research organizations located in the county ...................................................................... 5 1.2 Educational institutions in the county .................................................................................. 5 2 Socio-economic and SWOT analysis of the urban innovation ecosystem ................................... 7 2.1 Socioeconomic analysis ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FOUNDATION Regional Analysis PBN ENG V2
    HUNGARIAN REGIONAL ANALYSIS BUILDING REGIONAL RESILIENCE TO INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURAL CHANGE West-Transdanubian Region - Hungary Hungarian Partner Project Partner: Pannon Business Network Association Website Twitter https://www.interregeurope.eu/foundation/ @FOUNDATION_EU CONTENT INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... - 2 - Foundation Project partners ..................................................................................................... - 2 - Hungary – West-Transdanubian Region ................................................................................... - 3 - Regional Population and Industrial Statistics ........................................................................... - 6 - Economic Resilience across Europe ......................................................................................... - 12 - Hungry (Győr) – NUTS2 Nyugat-Dunántúl .............................................................................. - 13 - Industrial Restructuring in the West-Transdanubian Region .................................................. - 16 - Key policy players in the West-Transdanubian Region ........................................................... - 22 - Economic Restructuring – Case Study ..................................................................................... - 28 - INDUSTRY IN TRANSITION - CASE STUDY .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Act Cciii of 2011 on the Elections of Members Of
    Strasbourg, 15 March 2012 CDL-REF(2012)003 Opinion No. 662 / 2012 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) ACT CCIII OF 2011 ON THE ELECTIONS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT OF HUNGARY This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-REF(2012)003 - 2 - The Parliament - relying on Hungary’s legislative traditions based on popular representation; - guaranteeing that in Hungary the source of public power shall be the people, which shall pri- marily exercise its power through its elected representatives in elections which shall ensure the free expression of the will of voters; - ensuring the right of voters to universal and equal suffrage as well as to direct and secret bal- lot; - considering that political parties shall contribute to creating and expressing the will of the peo- ple; - recognising that the nationalities living in Hungary shall be constituent parts of the State and shall have the right ensured by the Fundamental Law to take part in the work of Parliament; - guaranteeing furthermore that Hungarian citizens living beyond the borders of Hungary shall be a part of the political community; in order to enforce the Fundamental Law, pursuant to Article XXIII, Subsections (1), (4) and (6), and to Article 2, Subsections (1) and (2) of the Fundamental Law, hereby passes the following Act on the substantive rules for the elections of Hungary’s Members of Parliament: 1. Interpretive provisions Section 1 For the purposes of this Act: Residence: the residence defined by the Act on the Registration of the Personal Data and Resi- dence of Citizens; in the case of citizens without residence, their current addresses.
    [Show full text]
  • Hungary's National Energy Efficiency Action Plan Until 2020
    Hungary’s National Energy Efficiency Action Plan until 2020 Mandatory reporting under Article 24(2) of Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on energy efficiency August 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................... 2 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND INFORMATION ............................................... 5 1.1 Hungary’s economic situation, influencing factors ..................................................... 6 1.2. Energy policy ............................................................................................................... 9 2. OVERVIEW OF NATIONAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY TARGETS AND SAVINGS 14 2.1 Indicative national 2020 energy efficiency target ..................................................... 14 2.2 Method of calculation ................................................................................................ 15 2.3 Overall primary energy consumption in 2020 and values by specific industries ...... 18 2.4 Final energy savings .................................................................................................. 19 3. POLICY MEASURES IMPLEMENTING EED ............................................................. 21 3.1 Horizontal measures .................................................................................................. 21 3.1.1
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Identity of the Borderland of Hungary, Austria and Slovenia
    Geographica Timisiensis, vol. XXIV, nr1, 2015 ● ETHNIC IDENTITY OF THE BORDERLAND OF HUNGARY, AUSTRIA AND SLOVENIA Dániel BALIZS Geographical Institute, Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Email: [email protected] Péter BAJMÓCY Szeged University, Department of Economy and Human Geography Szeged, Hungary Email: [email protected] Abstract The historical Vas county is a mezoregion on the borderland of three countries – Austria, Hungary and Slovenia. It has multipolar ethnic structure with several ethnic minorities along the borders. We can see the decline of ethnic diversity in the last decades not only in the disappearing of linguistic islands and scattered minority groups, but also in identitical (dual identity, strong local identities) and language using (bilingualism, polilingualism) aspects. In this paper we try to present the number, changes and regionality of ethnically mixed settlements and try to quantify the percentage of the ethnically mixed population. We used the official statistics and added the results of fieldworks and interviews with local people. In the minority settlements large percentage of the local community (30-70%) has a special type of identity because of the differences of ethnic, national and local identities, the geographic and historical circumstances. We can see this special way of thinking by the individual and community routes, language using specialities and the other representations of ethnic consciousness. Keywords: minorities, ethnic geography, ethnic identity, Carpathian Basin, diversity 1. INTRODUCTION The aim of this paper is to describe the ethnic characteristics of a special region. We can find several minority groups in the western part of the Carpathian-Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Szombathely Zalaszentiván
    Railway network development plans in West-Hungary GYSEV & the SETA project Szilárd Kövesdi, CEO of GYSEV Contents of presentation About GYSEV Connection between GYSEV and SETA GYSEV developments (planned and ongoing) Who we are 1872 Baron Victor von Erlanger won concession contract to construct a rail line between Győr-Sopron- Neufeld/Leitha 1876 Starting year of rail operation 1921 At the end of the 1st World War, part of the lines became Austrian territory (border- redrawing) 1923 Hungarian-Austrian state contract allowed the operation with Hungarian State’s major ownership Network and service area GYSEV rail network till 2001 - Győr-Sopron-Ebenfurth - Fertőszentmiklós-Neusiedl Network and service area GYSEV rail network from 2001 - Győr-Sopron-Ebenfurth - Fertőszentmiklós-Neusiedl - Sopron-Szombathely Network and service area GYSEV rail network from 2006 - Győr-Sopron-Ebenfurth - Fertőszentmiklós-Neusiedl - Sopron-Szombathely - Szombathely-Körmend- Szentgotthárd Network and service area GYSEVData about yearrail 2012: network fromFreight transport 2011: 5 M tons - LogisticsGyőr: -270.000Sopron tons moved-Ebenfurth - NumberFertőszentmiklós of trains operated: -Neusiedl - PassengerSopron: -Szombathely121,000 train Freight: 21,000 train - PassengerSzombathely Public transport-Körmend: - Szentgotthárd3.39 M passenger (HU) 1.39 M passenger (AT) - OwnPorpác property- linesCsorna: 116 km- Rajka Lines with property - management:Szombathely 387 kmZalaszentiván - StaffKörmend: 2,000 employees-Zalalövő (HU) - Szombathely 150 employees -(AT)Kőszeg
    [Show full text]
  • How to Establish and Operate Cross-Border Public
    Transport Geography Papers of Polish Geographical Society 2019, 22(1), 52-65 DOI 10.4467/2543859XPKG.19.006.10926 Received: 01.03.2019 Received in revised form: 21.03.2019 Accepted: 21.03.2019 Published: 29.03.2019 HOW TO ESTABLISH AND OPERATE CROSS-BORDER PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN A PERIPHERAL RURAL AREA? THE EXAMPLE OF THE CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN SECTION OF THE BORDER BETWEEN AUSTRIA AND HUNGARY Jak zorganizować i zarządzać systemem transgranicznego transportu publicznego na peryferyjnych obszarach wiejskich? Przykład środkowego i południowego pogranicza austriacko-węgierskiego Vilmos Oszter KTI Institute for Transport Sciences Non Profit Ltd., Than Károly 3-5, Budapest, 1119, Hungary e-mail: [email protected] Citation: Oszter V., 2019, How to establish and operate cross-border public transport in a peripheral rural area? The example of the Central and Southern section of the border between Austria and Hungary, Prace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG, 22(1), 52-65. Abstract: Based on the Interreg Central Europe Territorial cooperation Programme’s CONNECT2CE project the current paper analyses the existing passenger traffic flow across the border which is among the TOP10 busiest border section of the EU. It provides an overview of the main socio-economic characteristic of the peripheral border area and identifies the factors which are leading to the continuous growth of cross-border traffic. Based on previous research and travel surveys it collects the past service attempts offered to tap the growing cross-border travel demand. It also presents the most recent passenger counts and relational (Origin-Destination O-D) ticketing statistic in order to get precise knowledge about the usage level of the existing service which helps to understand the rapidly changing mobility patterns and spatial structure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic and Geographical Aspects of the Status of Small-Scale Photovoltaic Systems in Hungary—A Case Study
    energies Article The Economic and Geographical Aspects of the Status of Small-Scale Photovoltaic Systems in Hungary—A Case Study Gábor Pintér 1,2,3,*, Henrik Zsiborács 2,Nóra Heged ˝usné Baranyai 2, András Vincze 2 and Zoltán Birkner 2 1 IASK Institute of Advanced Studies, 9730 K˝oszeg,Hungary 2 Faculty of Engineering, Nagykanizsa Campus, University of Pannonia, 8800 Nagykanizsa, Hungary; [email protected] (H.Z.); [email protected] (N.H.B.); [email protected] (A.V.); [email protected] (Z.B.) 3 Festetics Doctoral School, Georgikon Faculty, University of Pannonia, 8360 Keszthely, Hungary * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +36-30-373-8550 Received: 7 June 2020; Accepted: 3 July 2020; Published: 6 July 2020 Abstract: The use of solar energy is an obvious choice; the energy of the sun is not only indispensable for most processes in nature but it is also a clean, abundant, sustainable, and—most importantly—universally available resource. Although the further spread of photovoltaic systems, which make use of this source of energy, is expected in the future all around the world, no comprehensive investigation has been conducted into the current situation of the small-scale photovoltaic power plants in Hungary, where this type of photovoltaic system is the most popular. By means of a case study, whose novelty lies in its focus on small-scale power plants and their complex examination, including economic and geographic indicators, this paper analyzes their status in Hungary. The study endeavors to establish the reasons for the popularity of this type of power plant and to identify some typical geographical locations with well-illustrated photovoltaic density.
    [Show full text]
  • Danube Basin Assessment Unit 40480301
    Danube Basin Assessment Unit 40480301 15 20 Poland Krakow 50 Czech ÚÊ ÚÊ Republic Lvov ÚÊ Brno Slovakia Ukraine ## ### Vienna ## # ÚÊ ÚÊ Bratislava Austria # # # ÚÊ ### Budapest # Hungary Romania Slovenia ÚÊ Zagreb Croatia 45 ÚÊ Belgrade Bosnia and Herzegovina Serbia and Montenegro 0 100 200 300 KILOMETERS ÚÊ Danube Basin Assessment Unit 40480301 Pannonian Basin Geologic Province 4048 USGS PROVINCE: Pannonian Basin (4048) GEOLOGIST: G.L. Dolton TOTAL PETROLEUM SYSTEM: Danube Neogene (404803) ASSESSMENT UNIT: Danube Basin (40480301) DESCRIPTION: This assessment unit consists of traps and accumulations in the Cenozoic basin fill of the Danube basin and in underlying Mesozoic basement nappes. Reservoirs are charged by Tertiary and Mesozoic organic-rich source rocks. Significant vertical migration characterizes this unit. Structural, stratigraphic and combination traps include growth faults, compaction features over basement highs and pinchouts in fluvial, shallow water, and turbidite sandstones and conglomerates, unconformity traps–particularly at the regional unconformity between synrift and postrift rocks, and in paleotopographic highs beneath the Tertiary fill, traps in basement nappes, and traps associated with strike-slip zones. SOURCE ROCKS: Neogene rocks, principally in the Miocene Sarmatian and Badenian sequences, are principal source rocks within Hungarian portion of the basin, but are of poor quality and largely gas prone, containing primarily Type II and Type III kerogen. In the Slovakian portion of the basin, the sources are Neogene sediments, particularly Lower Pannonian, Sarmatian, Middle Badenian, and lower Miocene, containing primarily Type III kerogen. Neogene source rocks are principally Pre-Pannonian marine rocks and Lower Pannonian lacustrine rocks. The Upper Triassic Kössen marl is a principal source rock of the oils in the nearby Zala basin but has not been identified in the Danube basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Reform and the Hungarian Peasantry C. 1700-1848
    Land Reform and the Hungarian Peasantry c. 1700-1848 Robert William Benjamin Gray UCL Thesis submitted for a PhD in History, 2009 1 I, Robert William Benjamin Gray, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 25th September 2009 2 Abstract This thesis examines the nature of lord-peasant relations in the final stages of Hungarian seigneurialism, dating roughly from 1700 to the emancipation of the peasantry in 1848. It investigates how the terms of the peasants’ relations with their lords, especially their obligations and the rights to the land they farmed, were established, both through written law and by customary practice. It also examines how the reforms of this period sought to redefine lord-peasant relations and rights to landed property. Under Maria Theresa land reform had been a means to protect the rural status quo and the livelihood of the peasantry: by the end of the 1840s it had become an integral part of a liberal reform movement aiming at the complete overhaul of Hungary’s ‘feudal’ social and economic system. In this period the status of the peasantry underpinned all attempts at reform. All reforms were claimed to be in the best interests of the peasantry, yet none stemmed from the peasants themselves. Conversely, the peasantry had means to voice their grievances through petitions and recourse to the courts, and took the opportunity provided by the reforms to reassert their rights and renegotiate the terms of their relations to their landlords.
    [Show full text]
  • Kerékpáros Útvonalajánlót Itt (Pdf)
    BÜK 4 – A tó vonzásában BÜK 5 – BÜK 6 – MTB-s élmények avagy Tereptúra a felszabadultság jegyében Útvonal: Bük (Bükfürdő) – Szakony – Zsira – Répcevis – Látványos élménytúra Peresznye – Csepreg – Bük (Bükfürdő) Útvonal: Bük (Bükfürdő) – Tömörd – Kőszegfalva Útvonal: Bük (Bükfürdő) – Bő – Gór – Szeleste – (Abért-tó) – Kőszeg – Ólmod – Peresznye – Répcevis – Útvonal hossza: 34 km Répceszentgyörgy – Gór – Bő – Bük (Bükfürdő) Csepreg – Bük (Bükfürdő) Szintemelkedés: 140 m Menetidő: kb. 3 óra Útvonal hossza: 28 km Útvonal hossza: 62 km lunk és ezen egyenesen az Abért-tóhoz érünk. Előtte kellő Javasolt kerékpártípus: trekking, túra, MTB kerékpár Szintemelkedés: 90 m Szintemelkedés: 500 m körültekintéssel haladjunk át a vasúton és a főútvonalon. Útvonal linkje: www.strava.com/routes/17245372 Menetidő: kb. 3 óra Menetidő: kb. 4-6 óra Javasolt kerékpártípus: trekking, túra, MTB kerékpár Remek hely egy hosszabb-rövidebb pihenő beiktatására, Javasolt kerékpártípus: MTB étkezésre, regenerálódásra. A pihenő után tekerjünk visz- Útvonal linkje: www.strava.com/routes/17219780 Útvonal linkje: www.strava.com/routes/17248438 Bükfürdőről induló kerékpártúránk első harmadában sza Kőszegfalvára, majd kerékpárúton Kőszegre. Akár két KÉT KERÉKEN kerékpárúton haladunk, egészen Zsira községig. Ezen keréken is felfedezhetjük a város nevezetességeit, majd a Fő teret a Várkörön elhagyva az EuroVelo13 útra érünk – útszakaszon áttekerünk Bükön, majd a városból kiérve, Bükfürdőről kerékpárúton érünk Bükre, majd a főúttal Bükfürdőről kiindulva kerekezzünk át Alsó-Bükre, majd az szántókkal szegélyezett úton érünk el Szakonyba. Végig párhuzamos kerékpárúton balra fordulunk, Bő irányá- forduljunk jobbra a Dózsa György úton és a 87-es főutat első kereszteződésnél forduljunk balra és tekerjünk Szom- keresztezve erdészeti úton menjünk tovább Ólmod felé. a Répcevidéken egyenesen kell haladnunk, nem kell letérni a kerékpárút- ba.
    [Show full text]
  • Enykk 2019 02 03
    MENETRENDI ÉRTESÍTÉS A Hivatalos Autóbusz Menetrend VAS MEGYEI TERÜLETI KÖTETÉHEZ ÉNYKK ÉSZAKNYUGAT-MAGYARORSZÁGI KÖZLEKEDÉSI KÖZPONT ZRT. 9700 Szombathely, Körmendi út 92. ● Tel.: 94/517-600 ● Fax.: 94/517-625 ● E-mail: [email protected] ● www.enykk.hu ÉNYKK Zrt. – 02–03 / 2018-2019.-VA Érvényes: 2019. június 15-től Értesítjük a Tisztelt Utazóközönséget, hogy fenti időponttól az alábbi módosítások lépnek életbe. TÁVOLSÁGI (ORSZÁGOS és REGIONÁLIS) JÁRATOK MÓDOSÍTÁSAI 1642 NAGYKANIZSA – ZALAEGERSZEG – SZOMBATHELY – SOPRON országos autóbuszvonalon 814 számú naponta közlekedő járat 5 perccel később indul és Szombathelyig menetidő korrekcióval közlekedik, további menetrendje változatlan: Sopron 15.10, Kőszeg 16.34, Szombathely 17.10, Vasvár 17.47, Zalaegerszeg 18.30, Nagykanizsa 19.20 1667 SZOMBATHELY – VASVÁR – ZALAEGERSZEG – NAGYKANIZSA regionális autóbuszvonalon 7 számú (Szombathely L13.20, Zalaegerszeg L14.30, Nagykanizsa L15.30) a hetek utolsó iskolai előadási napján közlekedő járat leáll. 1668 SZOMBATHELY – ZALAEGERSZEG – KAPOSVÁR – PÉCS országos autóbuszvonalon 7 számú (Szombathely, aut. áll. M19.10, Pécs, aut. áll. M23.50) a ’hetek első iskolai előadási napját megelőző munkaszüneti napokon’ jelzéssel közlekedő járat leáll. 2 számú (Pécs, aut. áll. m04.00, Szombathely, aut. áll. m8.35) ’munkaszüneti napot követően a hetek első iskolai előadási napján’ jelzéssel közlekedő járat leáll. 1669 LENTI – KÖRMEND – SZOMBATHELY regionális autóbuszvonalon 111 számú (Lenti L8.30, Szombathely L9.50) a hetek utolsó iskolai előadási napján közlekedő járat ’tanév tartama alatt a hetek utolsó munkanapján, valamint szombati iskolai előadási napokon’ jelzéssel 13.00 órakor indulva közlekedik: Lenti 413.00, Szombathely 414.20 VAS MEGYÉT ÉRINTŐ REGIONÁLIS MÓDOSÍTÁSOK 6277 ZALAEGERSZEG – ZALALÖVŐ – ŐRISZENTPÉTER regionális autóbuszvonalon 618 számú (Őriszentpéter .6.10, Zalalövő .6.35, Zalaegerszeg .7.10) munkanapi járat megáll .6.56 órakor a ’Bagod, aut.
    [Show full text]