Belle La Folletteâ•Žs Fight for Womenâ•Žs Suffrage: Losing the Battle for Wisconsin, Winning the War for the Nation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Belle La Folletteâ•Žs Fight for Womenâ•Žs Suffrage: Losing the Battle for Wisconsin, Winning the War for the Nation Santa Clara University Scholar Commons History College of Arts & Sciences Summer 2019 Belle La Follette’s Fight for Women’s Suffrage: Losing the Battle for iW sconsin, Winning the War for the Nation Nancy C. Unger Santa Clara University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/history Part of the American Politics Commons, Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Legal History Commons, Political History Commons, United States History Commons, and the Women's History Commons Recommended Citation Unger, N. (2019). Belle La Follette’s Fight for Women’s Suffrage: Losing the Battle for iW sconsin, Winning the War for the Nation. Wisconsin Magazine of History, 102(4), 28–41. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts & Sciences at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in History by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WHI IMAGE ID 11701 ID IMAGE WHI Belle La Follette’s FIGHT FOR WOMEN’S SUFFRAGE Losing the Battle for Wisconsin, Winning the War for the Nation BY NANCY C. UNGER 28 WISCONSIN MAGAZINE OF HISTORY century ago, on May 21, 1919, the US suffrage amendment [because of] your smart mother.” House of Representatives voted difini- Belle La Follette, worried that Illinois would “try to tively (304 to 89) in support of women’s steal first honors,” had wired representatives in her suffrage. Two weeks later, Wisconsinite home state to be sure that Wisconsin acted as quickly BelleA La Follette sat in the visitors’ gallery of the US as possible.2 Former state senator David James, whose Senate chamber. She “shed a few tears” when it was daughter Ada had been a leader in the state’s crusade, announced that, by a vote of 56 to 25, the US Senate was hailed by Belle as “the gallant, veteran courier” also approved the Nineteenth Amendment, sending it for delivering the papers to the state department just on to the states for ratification.1 For Belle La Follette, moments ahead of the messenger from Illinois.3 As this thrilling victory was the culmination of a decades- soon as a telegram of confirmation was received, long fight. Six days later, her happiness turned to reported Bob, “I went on the floor and had it read elation when Wisconsin became the first state to into the [Congressional] Record. Mamma and all deliver a certification of ratification. Her husband, of us feel good, you bet.”4 Senator Robert “Fighting Bob” La Follette, confided Belle Case La Follette speaks with characteristic vigor for women’s to their children that Wisconsin “beat ’em to it on the suffrage at the Fox River Fair during the 1912 Wisconsin campaign. SUMMER 2019 29 Wisconsin held its first state- wide suffrage convention, a gathering attended by national WHI IMAGE ID 35075 ID IMAGE WHI leaders Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton. Many Wisconsin women promoted a combination of temperance and suffrage, earning the staunch opposition of the state’s beer- drinking population as well as its powerful brewing inter- ests. More acceptable to male policy makers were women who proclaimed themselves bent only on improving public schools. This goal did not inter- fere with local alcohol produc- tion or consumption, and it was more in keeping with women’s traditional and non–politically Former state senator David G. James (R-Richland Center, 1908–1912) celebrates with suffrage threatening interest in child- supporters outside the National Women’s Party building in Washington, DC, after delivering hood education. Wisconsin’s ratification papers, likely June 13, 1919. The Wisconsin Women’s Suffrage Association (WWSA), “It was no mere state pride that caused me to thrill with established in 1882 as the successor to the WSASW, began joy,” Belle La Follette insisted when she recalled the incident an all-out suffrage campaign in 1884. The following year in La Follette’s Magazine (published today as The Progres- the state legislature, ceding the argument that children’s sive), but rather “the conviction that a great service had issues were the rightful domain of women, passed a law been rendered. With Wisconsin as an example . ratifying (contingent upon voter approval) allowing women to run so speedily, almost unanimously, the opposition was . left for school boards and other elective school offices, and to dashed and hopeless at the very start!”5 It was a triumph that vote in “any election pertaining to school matters.” This contrasted sharply with the resounding defeat of women’s law, known as “school suffrage,” was approved by popular suffrage in Wisconsin in 1912 following an exhaustive state- vote in 1886, but Wisconsin women lost even this limited wide crusade in which she had played a leading role. The suffrage in 1888.7 story of the two campaigns, the first a statewide failure and the second a national victory, reveals the dramatic changes emerging in the state and in the nation during the intervening seven years and highlights the role of Belle La Follette as a key player in the charge that led to the Nineteenth Amendment WHI IMAGE ID115805 to the US Constitution. Wisconsin’s Early Suffrage Efforts Suffrage was a contentious issue in Wisconsin. When state- hood was achieved in 1848, the framers of the constitution denied African American men the franchise, a decision that was overturned when black Milwaukee resident Ezekiel Gillespie sued the state in 1866.6 The framers also rejected efforts to grant married women property or voting rights. Attempts to push through suffrage bills in 1855 and 1856 were quickly quashed, giving rise to women’s rights groups Ada James of Richland Center, daughter of state senator in the late 1860s. In 1869, the Woman Suffrage Associa - David James, was a leader for decades in Wisconsin’s fight for tion of the State of Wisconsin (WSASW) was formed and women’s suffrage. 30 WISCONSIN MAGAZINE OF HISTORY Once her husband became governor in 1900, Belle to take up physical exercise and work outside the home, and La Follette began to use her influence to build on the promoting women’s clubs as important ways to contribute to momentum for women’s suffrage established by a plethora civic life and reform. When, after three terms as governor, of state leaders, most notably Ada James of Richland Center Bob La Follette was elected to the US Senate in 1906, his and Theodora Winton Youmans of Waukesha. Governor wife despaired of the way club women in the nation’s capital La Follette, who openly referred to his wife as “my wisest resisted civic engagement. She rather tartly reminded her and best counselor,” appointed women to state boards and sisters in Washington’s official life, “We are not supposed to commissions.8 In 1901, separate ballots were authorized for belong to the butterfly and parasitic class.”13 Beginning in school-related issues, reinstating and regularizing women’s 1909, her own widening circle of activities came to include voting. As the state’s First Lady, Belle urged Wisconsin writing the Home and Education column for La Follette’s women to make the most of their limited suffrage: “Be sure to Magazine, an enterprise dear to her husband’s heart but one vote for State Superinten- dent of Public Instruction even if you cannot vote for other officers. Don’t fold your talent in a napkin. If you vote when you have an opportunity, the opportu- nities increase.”9 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS LC-DIG-DS-05722 CONGRESS OF LIBRARY The Making of a Suffragist Belle La Follette’s belief in the rightness, and the neces- sity, of votes for women was unwavering. Born Isabelle Case on April 21, 1859, in Summit, Wisconsin, she grew up on her fami- ly’s farm in Baraboo. Her mother, deeply moved after hearing minister and physi- cian Anna Howard Shaw’s promotion of women’s right Belle La Follette was the first woman to graduate from the University of Wisconsin Law School. to vote, told young Belle She poses here with the other members of the class of 1885. that she felt “very indignant” that women did not have the same rights as men.10 Belle’s she found a drain on their energy and finances. Nevertheless, brother stated matter-of-factly, “I do not see any reason why her weekly column gave her new opportunities to campaign I should vote if Belle doesn’t.”11 Belle La Follette’s confidence for women’s suffrage. in women’s political power was reinforced during her years at the University of Wisconsin, where she had the opportunity Campaign Strategies to hear not only Anna Howard Shaw but also Elizabeth Cady Belle La Follette knew that many men opposed votes for Stanton, Julia Ward Howe, Susan B. Anthony, and Carrie women because they believed it would distract them from Chapman Catt. She revered these early suffrage advocates, the domestic world of home, husband, and children that later noting gratefully, “We stand on their shoulders.”12 should be every woman’s sole concern. Moreover, they Belle La Follette’s status as the first woman to graduate believed, the natural forces that rendered women so attuned from the University of Wisconsin Law School (an achieve- to domestic tasks left them ill-suited for the complex hurly ment fulfilled after she became a wife and mother) cemented burly of politics, a world that encompassed economics, busi- her belief that women were being held back by custom rather ness, and other subjects too sophisticated for the emotional than lack of innate ability. While supportive of her husband’s and sentimental female mind.
Recommended publications
  • The 19Th Amendment
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Women Making History: The 19th Amendment Women The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. —19th Amendment to the United States Constitution In 1920, after decades of tireless activism by countless determined suffragists, American women were finally guaranteed the right to vote. The year 2020 marks the 100th anniversary of the 19th Amendment. It was ratified by the states on August 18, 1920 and certified as an amendment to the US Constitution on August 26, 1920. Developed in partnership with the National Park Service, this publication weaves together multiple stories about the quest for women’s suffrage across the country, including those who opposed it, the role of allies and other civil rights movements, who was left behind, and how the battle differed in communities across the United States. Explore the complex history and pivotal moments that led to ratification of the 19th Amendment as well as the places where that history happened and its continued impact today. 0-31857-0 Cover Barcode-Arial.pdf 1 2/17/20 1:58 PM $14.95 ISBN 978-1-68184-267-7 51495 9 781681 842677 The National Park Service is a bureau within the Department Front cover: League of Women Voters poster, 1920. of the Interior. It preserves unimpaired the natural and Back cover: Mary B. Talbert, ca. 1901. cultural resources and values of the National Park System for the enjoyment, education, and inspiration of this and All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this work future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • AM IDEOLOGICAL ANALYSIS of the SENATE WARTIME ADDRESSES of ROBERT MARION LA FOLLETTE Harry R. Gianneschi a Dissertation Submitte
    AM IDEOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE SENATE WARTIME ADDRESSES OF ROBERT MARION LA FOLLETTE Harry R. Gianneschi A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December . 197.5 618206 Vu.w ii Wo • ABSTRACT Robert Marion La Follette, leading American progres­ sive, Governor of Wisconsin for three terms, and U. S. Senator from 1905 to 1925, was selected by the 1957 Senate as one of five of its greatest members throughout this country’s history. In light of Ij.s subsequent praiseworthy reputation and of the popular support he maintained during most of his career, the reason for his publicly denounced "anti-war" stance in 1917 has remained a mystery to many critics. Viewing the stance as a break-away from his previous beliefs, historians have tagged him as pacifistic, ignorant, or demagogic in his approach to the war. This study was designed to investigate elements in La Follette's life and speaking which could clarify the motivation for his Senate speeches from April 4 to October 6 in 1917. Research on this topic was devoted to an in-depth investigation of La Follette's entire speaking career. Texts of the speeches he gave during his life, editorial writings presented in La Follette's Magazine, and the personal papers of La Follette, members of his family, and close friends, all located in the Wisconsin State Histori­ cal Society Archives, were studied. Reactions were discovered in accounts by his contemporaries and the newspapers of the day.
    [Show full text]
  • How Did Belle La Follette Resist Racial Segregation in Washington D.C., 1913-1914?
    Santa Clara University Scholar Commons History College of Arts & Sciences 6-2004 How did Belle La Follette Resist Racial Segregation in Washington D.C., 1913-1914? Nancy Unger Santa Clara University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/history Part of the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Political History Commons, Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies Commons, Social History Commons, Social Justice Commons, United States History Commons, and the Women's History Commons Recommended Citation Unger, N. (2004) How did Belle La Follette Resist Racial Segregation in Washington D.C., 1913-1914? In K. Sklar and T. Dublin (Eds.) Women and Social Movements in the United States, 1775-2000, 8, no. 2. New York: Alexander Street Press. Copyright © 2004 Thomas Dublin, Kathryn Kish Sklar and Alexander Street Press, LLC. Reprinted with permission. Any future reproduction requires permission from original copyright holders. http://asp6new.alexanderstreet.com/tinyurl/tinyurl.resolver.aspx?tinyurl=3CPQ This Other is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts & Sciences at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in History by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. How Did Belle La Follette Oppose Racial Segregation in Washington, D.C., 1913-1914? Abstract Beginning in 1913, progressive reformer Belle Case La Follette wrote a series of articles for the "women's page" of her family's magazine, denouncing the sudden racial segregation in several departments of the federal government. Those articles reveal progressive efforts to appeal specifically to women to combat injustice, and also demonstrate the ability of women to voice important political opinions prior to suffrage.
    [Show full text]
  • TABLE of CONTENTS Nevertheless, She Persists
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Nevertheless, She Persists .................................................................................................... pp. 2-5 Crystal Bridges Paintings……………………………………..pp. 3-4 The Creators……………………………………………………………………………….pp. 5-9 Sue Schroeder………………………………………………….... p. 5 Core Dancers………………………………………………....pp. 6-7 Jillian Gregory………………………………………………..pp. 7-9 Sharon M. Louden………………………………………………. p. 9 Christian Meyer………………………………………………... p. 9 Writeous Poets Texts…………………………………………………………………….pp. 10-21 I Guess I’m Just Used to it……………………………………..pp. 9-10 Amanda………………………………………………………..pp. 10-11 I Am Enough…………………………………………………..pp. 11-13 Ain’t I………………………………………………………….pp. 13-15 The Greatest Actors…………………………………………...pp. 15-17 Lifting and Climbing…………………………………………..pp. 18-20 Suffrage Rugs Descriptions…………………………………………………………… .pp. 22-23 1 Nevertheless, She Persists Premiere Performance/Intervention October 22, 2020 Alumni Circle, University of Central Arkansas Commemorating the 100th Anniversary of the passage of the 19th Amendment guaranteeing and protecting a woman’s constitutional right to vote Sue Schroeder, Artistic Director in collaboration with Core Dance Artists: Walter Apps, Joshua Rackliffe, Rose Shields, Benjamin Stevenson, Scott Wheet Jillian Gregory: Designer and Creator of the Transparent Women Project: Exploring Outdated Aesthetics on the Modern Woman’s Body, including: 1850s Dress modeled by Shalea O'Riley 1880s Dress modeled by Annabelle Dickson 1900s Dress modeled by Taylor Conway Suffragette Dress modeled by Miriam
    [Show full text]
  • Belle La Follette
    BELLE LA FOLLETTE On August 20, 1931, the New York Times hailed Belle Case La Follette as “probably the least known yet most influential of all the American women who have had to do with public affairs.” A dedicated advocate for women’s suffrage, peace, and other causes, she served as a key advisor to her husband, leading Progressive politician Robert La Follette. She also wielded consider- able influence through her own speeches and journalism, as when she opposed racism by speaking out against the segregation of the federal gov- ernment under President Woodrow Wilson. In a concise, lively, and engaging narrative, Nancy C. Unger shows how Belle La Follette uniquely contributed to progressive reform, as well as the ways her work was typical of women—and progressives—of her time. Supported by primary documents and a robust companion website, this book intro- duces students of American history to an extraordinary woman and the era of progressive reform. Nancy C. Unger is Professor of History at Santa Clara University. She is the author of Beyond Nature’s Housekeepers: American Women in Environmen- tal History and Fighting Bob La Follette: The Righteous Reformer. ROUTLEDGE HISTORICAL AMERICANS SERIES EDITOR: PAUL FINKELMAN Routledge Historical Americans is a series of short, vibrant biographies that illuminate the lives of Americans who have had an impact on the world. Each book includes a brief overview of the person’s life and puts that person into historical context through essential primary documents, written both by the subjects and about them. A series website supports the books, con- taining extra images and documents, links to further research, and where possible, multimedia sources on the subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Suffrage School Presentation
    How much do you know about the women’s suffrage movement? 1. Suffrage from the Latin word suffragium refers to… A) Those who suffered to obtain the right to vote B) A vote given in deciding a controversial question C) The sacrifices which must be made for representative government 1. Suffrage from the Latin word suffragium refers to… B) A vote given in deciding a controversial question 2. What is the difference between the word suffragist and suffragette? A) Suffragist refers to males and suffragette refers to females. B) Suffragist was used to refer to women seeking the right to vote whereas these women referred to themselves as suffragettes. C) Suffragette is a derogatory term while suffragist is not. 2. What is the difference between the word suffragist and suffragette? C) Suffragette is a derogatory term while suffragist is not. At first the term was used to mock the British suffragists, but they embraced it and used it to their advantage. 3. The Women’s Rights Convention was held in Seneca Falls in 1848. The document drafted for this convention was called… A) “The Inalienable Rights for Women” B) “The Declaration of the Rights of Women” C) “The Declaration of Sentiments” 3. The Women’s Rights Convention was held in Seneca Falls in 1848. The document drafted for this convention was called… C) “The Declaration of Sentiments” This statement was modeled after the Declaration of Independence, stating, “We hold these truths to be self-evident; that all men and women are created equal.” It enumerated a list of rights women were demanding, some of which have yet to be achieved.
    [Show full text]
  • “Not As a Favor, Not As a Privilege, but As a Right”: Woman Suffragists, Race, Rights, and the Nineteenth Amendment
    Western New England Law Review Volume 42 42 Issue 3 Article 4 2020 “NOT AS A FAVOR, NOT AS A PRIVILEGE, BUT AS A RIGHT”: WOMAN SUFFRAGISTS, RACE, RIGHTS, AND THE NINETEENTH AMENDMENT Joan Marie Johnson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.wne.edu/lawreview Recommended Citation Joan Marie Johnson, “NOT AS A FAVOR, NOT AS A PRIVILEGE, BUT AS A RIGHT”: WOMAN SUFFRAGISTS, RACE, RIGHTS, AND THE NINETEENTH AMENDMENT, 42 W. New Eng. L. Rev. 385 (2020), https://digitalcommons.law.wne.edu/lawreview/vol42/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Review & Student Publications at Digital Commons @ Western New England University School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western New England Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Western New England University School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WESTERN NEW ENGLAND LAW REVIEW Volume 42 2020 Issue 3 “NOT AS A FAVOR, NOT AS A PRIVILEGE, BUT AS A RIGHT”: WOMAN SUFFRAGISTS, RACE, RIGHTS, AND THE NINETEENTH AMENDMENT JOAN MARIE JOHNSON* This brief history of the woman suffrage movement shows how various suffragists believed the right to vote for women was a human right that all American citizens should possess, while other suffragists viewed their struggle as one for respect and protection from abusive men. These differences are particularly salient in the fraught role of black woman suffragists, who, while dedicated to the cause, were frequently unwelcome in the white-dominated state and national movements. In January 1910, white suffragist Alva Belmont met with three black suffragists—Irene Moorman, Sarah Garnet, and Maria Lawton—to discuss forming a black branch of Belmont’s suffrage organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Carol Wheeler's "History of the Suffrage Movement from a Black
    HISTORY OF THE SUFFRAGE MOVEMENT FROM A BLACK WOMAN’S PERSPECTIVE The month of March is National Women’s History Month and this year marks the 100th anniversary of the passage of the 19th Amendment giving women the right to vote. While most of us have heard stories and have seen images of white suffragettes, there’s usually not much mention of the contributions of people of color. I’d like to acknowledge the work of Native Americans, Asian, Hispanic, and other people of color in this endeavor. In this short time frame, I’m going to explore the women’s suffrage movement from a black woman’s perspective. In 1848, the first woman’s rights convention was held in Seneca Falls, NY led by such notables as Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucretia Mott, and Susan B. Anthony. No black women were in attendance. Let’s put this in historical context. In 1848, slavery was a booming business and most black women were otherwise occupied being enslaved or focused on pure survival. However, there were black women who spoke out for women’s suffrage, such as well-known former slave Sojourner Truth. The Civil War was fought from 1861to 1865. In 1865 the 13th Amendment abolished slavery. But it was the 15th Amendment giving black men the right to vote that shook up the women’s suffrage movement. Prior to the 15th Amendment, black and white suffragettes worked together. The proposed 15th Amendment split the movement into two camps. One group, led by Stanton and Anthony, opposed black men getting the vote BEFORE white women.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Suffrage Quiz
    How much do you know about women’s suffrage? 1. Suffrage from the Latin word suffragium refers to… A) Those who suffered to obtain the right to vote B) A vote given in deciding a controversial question C) The sacrifices which must be made for representative government 2. What is the difference between the word suffragist and suffragette? A) Suffragist refers to males and suffragette refers to females. B) Suffragist was used to refer to women seeking the right to vote, whereas these women referred to themselves as suffragettes. C) Suffragette is a derogatory term while suffragist is not. 3. The Women’s Rights Convention was held in Seneca Falls in 1848. The document drafted at this convention was called… A) “The Inalienable Rights for Women” B) “The Declaration of the Rights of Women” C) “The Declaration of Sentiments” 4. The legislatures in Illinois, Michigan, and Wisconsin all ratified the 19th amendment on June 10, 1919. Wisconsin was given credit for being the first to ratify because… A) Its papers were the first to be filed in Washington, D.C. B) A legislator in Illinois delayed the vote in Springfield due to the birth of his daughter C) The official time stamp on Michigan’s papers was smudged and therefore judged invalid. 5. Early women’s suffragists were criticized for which of the following: (Choose two answers.) A) Lack of support for women of color B) Violence and destruction of property C) Association with the temperance (anti-alcohol) movement Match the national leaders of the women’s suffrage movement to the description: ___ Lucretia Mott (1793-1880) ___ Sojourner Truth (1797-1883) ___ Elizabeth Cady Stanton (1815-1902) ___ Mary Church Terrell (1863-1954) ___ Susan B.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Suffrage School Presentation
    How much do you know about the women’s suffrage movement? 1. Suffrage from the Latin word suffragium refers to… A) those who suffer to obtain the right to vote B) a vote given in deciding a controversial question C) the sacrifices which must be made to establish representative government Suffrage from the Latin word suffragium refers to… B) a vote given in deciding a controversial question 2. What is the difference between the word suffragist and suffragette? A) Suffragist refers to males and suffragette refers to females. B) Suffragist was used to refer to women seeking the right to vote whereas these women referred to themselves as suffragettes. C) Suffragette is a derogatory term while suffragist is not. 2. What is the difference between the word suffragist and suffragette? C) Suffragette is a derogatory term while suffragist is not. At first the term was used to mock the suffragists, but they embraced it and used it to their advantage. 3. The Women’s Rights Convention was held in Seneca Falls, NY in 1848. The document drafted at this convention was called… A) “The Inalienable Rights for Women” B) “The Declaration of Rights of Women” C) “The Declaration of Sentiments” 3. The Women’s Rights Convention was held in Seneca Falls, NY in 1848. The document drafted at this convention was called… C. “The Declaration of Sentiments” This statement was modeled after the Declaration of Independence, stating, “We hold these truths to be self-evident; that all men and women are created equal.” It enumerated a list of rights women were demanding, some of which have yet to be achieved.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Suffrage
    Inquiry Set 11.2: Women’s Suffrage ​ I. Inquiry Set Introduction Inquiry Set Title Women’s Suffrage Brief Description This inquiry set is designed to provide context for students to be able to address with nuance and perspective the question, Why did women want the right to vote, and how did they convince men to grant it to them? Women in California won the right to vote in the 1911 election, nearly a decade before the national suffrage amendment passed. Authors Beth Slutsky, California History-Social Science Project, UC Davis Grade Levels 11 Topics/Concepts voting, suffrage, progressivism, Jim Crow, 1890s, 1900s, 1910s, Seneca Falls CA HSS United States History and Geography: Continuity and Change in the Twentieth Century Standards / 11.2 Students analyze the relationship among the rise of industrialization, large-scale rural-to-urban migration, and Frameworks ​ massive immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe. 11.2.9 Understand the effect of political programs and activities of the Progressives (e.g., federal regulation of ​ railroad transport, Children's Bureau, the Sixteenth Amendment, Theodore Roosevelt, Hiram Johnson). 11.5.4 Analyze the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment and the changing role of women in society. ​ Framework Because progressivism called for an expanded government to protect individuals, it is only natural that expanding Excerpt voting rights were deemed equally important. In California, women received the right to vote in 1911; on the national level, it took several more years. Students read about leading suffragists and their organizations, especially the National American Woman Suffrage Association (NAWSA) and the National Women’s Party (NWP).
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Suffrage
    Women’s Suffrage Overview This lesson plan will address women’s suffrage and the history of the ratification of the 19th Amendment in North Carolina in conjunction with present-day voter suppression. Students will explore primary sources including images, petitions, and recordings from the Southern Oral History Project. They will also be asked to think about the relationship between women’s experiences advocating for the 19th Amendment and current- day experiences with voter suppression. They will think through forms of protest and produce documents advocating for the right to vote, modeled after the advocacy work of the women seeking to gain suffrage. This lesson adds to existing content on the history of women’s right to vote by focusing specifically on the experience of suffragists in North Carolina and by working through the relationship between historic and present-day voting rights. Grades 8-12 Essential Questions • Who in North Carolina opposed women’s suffrage and for what reasons? • In what ways was the Nineteenth Amendment neither the beginning nor the end to the story of women’s rights and voting? • Despite the Nineteenth Amendment’s passage, in what ways did states still restrict the voting rights based on race and/or sex? • In what ways did indigenous and black women influence the suffrage movement? • Why are the contributions of black women and women of color less known than the contributions of white women who fought for suffrage throughout history? • What did it take on the part of women of all races to finally secure
    [Show full text]