Suffrage Rugs Descriptions with Sketches
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Sylvia Pankhurst's Sedition of 1920
“Upheld by Force” Sylvia Pankhurst’s Sedition of 1920 Edward Crouse Undergraduate Thesis Department of History Columbia University April 4, 2018 Seminar Advisor: Elizabeth Blackmar Second Reader: Susan Pedersen With dim lights and tangled circumstance they tried to shape their thought and deed in noble agreement; but after all, to common eyes their struggles seemed mere inconsistency and formlessness; for these later-born Theresas were helped by no coherent social faith and order which could perform the function of knowledge for the ardently willing soul. Their ardor alternated between a vague ideal and the common yearning of womanhood; so that the one was disapproved as extravagance, and the other condemned as a lapse. – George Eliot, Middlemarch, 1872 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................... 2 Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................ 3 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 4 The End of Edwardian England: Pankhurst’s Political Development ................................. 12 After the War: Pankhurst’s Collisions with Communism and the State .............................. 21 Appealing Sedition: Performativity of Communism and Suffrage ....................................... 33 Prison and Release: Attempted Constructions of Martyrology -
The 19Th Amendment
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Women Making History: The 19th Amendment Women The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. —19th Amendment to the United States Constitution In 1920, after decades of tireless activism by countless determined suffragists, American women were finally guaranteed the right to vote. The year 2020 marks the 100th anniversary of the 19th Amendment. It was ratified by the states on August 18, 1920 and certified as an amendment to the US Constitution on August 26, 1920. Developed in partnership with the National Park Service, this publication weaves together multiple stories about the quest for women’s suffrage across the country, including those who opposed it, the role of allies and other civil rights movements, who was left behind, and how the battle differed in communities across the United States. Explore the complex history and pivotal moments that led to ratification of the 19th Amendment as well as the places where that history happened and its continued impact today. 0-31857-0 Cover Barcode-Arial.pdf 1 2/17/20 1:58 PM $14.95 ISBN 978-1-68184-267-7 51495 9 781681 842677 The National Park Service is a bureau within the Department Front cover: League of Women Voters poster, 1920. of the Interior. It preserves unimpaired the natural and Back cover: Mary B. Talbert, ca. 1901. cultural resources and values of the National Park System for the enjoyment, education, and inspiration of this and All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this work future generations. -
Australian Women, Past and Present
Diversity in Leadership Australian women, past and present Diversity in Leadership Australian women, past and present Edited by Joy Damousi, Kim Rubenstein and Mary Tomsic Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://press.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Diversity in leadership : Australian women, past and present / Joy Damousi, Kim Rubenstein, Mary Tomsic, editors. ISBN: 9781925021707 (paperback) 9781925021714 (ebook) Subjects: Leadership in women--Australia. Women--Political activity--Australia. Businesswomen--Australia. Women--Social conditions--Australia Other Authors/Contributors: Damousi, Joy, 1961- editor. Rubenstein, Kim, editor. Tomsic, Mary, editor. Dewey Number: 305.420994 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU Press Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2014 ANU Press Contents Introduction . 1 Part I. Feminist perspectives and leadership 1 . A feminist case for leadership . 17 Amanda Sinclair Part II. Indigenous women’s leadership 2 . Guthadjaka and Garŋgulkpuy: Indigenous women leaders in Yolngu, Australia-wide and international contexts . 39 Gwenda Baker, Joanne Garŋgulkpuy and Kathy Guthadjaka 3 . Aunty Pearl Gibbs: Leading for Aboriginal rights . 53 Rachel Standfield, Ray Peckham and John Nolan Part III. Local and global politics 4 . Women’s International leadership . 71 Marilyn Lake 5 . The big stage: Australian women leading global change . 91 Susan Harris Rimmer 6 . ‘All our strength, all our kindness and our love’: Bertha McNamara, bookseller, socialist, feminist and parliamentary aspirant . -
Working Women's Life Writing and Authorial Competency
WORKING WOMEN’S LIFE WRITING AND AUTHORIAL COMPETENCY A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillments of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Sarah Nicole MacDonald November 2017 Copyright All right reserved Except for previously published materials Dissertation written by Sarah Nicole MacDonald B.A., Southern Illinois University, 2003 M.A., Southern Illinois University, 2006 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2017 Approved by ______________________________, Co-Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Margaret Shaw ______________________________, Co-Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Sara Newman ______________________________, Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Kevin Floyd ______________________________ Dr. Leonne Hudson ______________________________ Dr. Jennifer Larson Accepted by ______________________________, Interim Chair, Department of English Dr. Robert Trogdon ______________________________, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Dr. James L. Blank Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 Life Writing ................................................................................................................................ 4 Devaluation ................................................................................................................................. 5 Truth in Life Writing ................................................................................................................. -
TABLE of CONTENTS Nevertheless, She Persists
TABLE OF CONTENTS Nevertheless, She Persists .................................................................................................... pp. 2-5 Crystal Bridges Paintings……………………………………..pp. 3-4 The Creators……………………………………………………………………………….pp. 5-9 Sue Schroeder………………………………………………….... p. 5 Core Dancers………………………………………………....pp. 6-7 Jillian Gregory………………………………………………..pp. 7-9 Sharon M. Louden………………………………………………. p. 9 Christian Meyer………………………………………………... p. 9 Writeous Poets Texts…………………………………………………………………….pp. 10-21 I Guess I’m Just Used to it……………………………………..pp. 9-10 Amanda………………………………………………………..pp. 10-11 I Am Enough…………………………………………………..pp. 11-13 Ain’t I………………………………………………………….pp. 13-15 The Greatest Actors…………………………………………...pp. 15-17 Lifting and Climbing…………………………………………..pp. 18-20 Suffrage Rugs Descriptions…………………………………………………………… .pp. 22-23 1 Nevertheless, She Persists Premiere Performance/Intervention October 22, 2020 Alumni Circle, University of Central Arkansas Commemorating the 100th Anniversary of the passage of the 19th Amendment guaranteeing and protecting a woman’s constitutional right to vote Sue Schroeder, Artistic Director in collaboration with Core Dance Artists: Walter Apps, Joshua Rackliffe, Rose Shields, Benjamin Stevenson, Scott Wheet Jillian Gregory: Designer and Creator of the Transparent Women Project: Exploring Outdated Aesthetics on the Modern Woman’s Body, including: 1850s Dress modeled by Shalea O'Riley 1880s Dress modeled by Annabelle Dickson 1900s Dress modeled by Taylor Conway Suffragette Dress modeled by Miriam -
LWVVT Summer 2020 Newsletter
Green Mountain CITIZEN Summer 2020 LWVVT Decries Police Killing of George Floyd The League of Women Voters of Vermont grieves the murders of George Floyd and countless other Black lives that have been tragically taken at the hands of rogue law enforcement officers who are rarely held fully accountable for their actions. We have seen people from all over the country exercising their First Amendment rights as peaceful demonstrators take to the streets demanding change. We have seen people of every race, religion, and ethnic background stand and kneel in solidarity with the Black community with the same message— Black Lives Matter. We have also seen civil unrest in some places and, sadly, acts of police violence against protestors. We must not let those images derail the fight against systemic racial injustice and inequality. The systems of oppression that have perpetuated the myth of white supremacy in our country must be dismantled if we are ever to become the nation we pledge to be—indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. As an organization whose mission is to empower voters and defend democracy, we stand in solidarity with all Black communities. The League shall do so by speaking out against racism in all forms and being committed to listening to and amplifying Black voices, and educating ourselves and our children on the historic and ongoing systemic racism that plagues this country. The League acknowledges, painfully, that America is a nation founded on racism. Therefore, all who live in this country must contribute to and participate in organizations actively working to achieve full liberation and inclusive freedom. -
Women's Suffrage School Presentation
How much do you know about the women’s suffrage movement? 1. Suffrage from the Latin word suffragium refers to… A) Those who suffered to obtain the right to vote B) A vote given in deciding a controversial question C) The sacrifices which must be made for representative government 1. Suffrage from the Latin word suffragium refers to… B) A vote given in deciding a controversial question 2. What is the difference between the word suffragist and suffragette? A) Suffragist refers to males and suffragette refers to females. B) Suffragist was used to refer to women seeking the right to vote whereas these women referred to themselves as suffragettes. C) Suffragette is a derogatory term while suffragist is not. 2. What is the difference between the word suffragist and suffragette? C) Suffragette is a derogatory term while suffragist is not. At first the term was used to mock the British suffragists, but they embraced it and used it to their advantage. 3. The Women’s Rights Convention was held in Seneca Falls in 1848. The document drafted for this convention was called… A) “The Inalienable Rights for Women” B) “The Declaration of the Rights of Women” C) “The Declaration of Sentiments” 3. The Women’s Rights Convention was held in Seneca Falls in 1848. The document drafted for this convention was called… C) “The Declaration of Sentiments” This statement was modeled after the Declaration of Independence, stating, “We hold these truths to be self-evident; that all men and women are created equal.” It enumerated a list of rights women were demanding, some of which have yet to be achieved. -
Passive Voter Suppression: Campaign Mobilization and the Effective Disfranchisement of the Poor
University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Articles Colorado Law Faculty Scholarship 2019 Passive Voter Suppression: Campaign Mobilization and the Effective Disfranchisement of the Poor Bertrall L. Ross II Berkeley Law Douglas M. Spencer University of Colorado Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/articles Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Election Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Law and Race Commons, and the Legal History Commons Citation Information Bertrall L. Ross II and Douglas M. Spencer, Passive Voter Suppression: Campaign Mobilization and the Effective Disfranchisement of the Poor, 114 NW. U. L. REV. 633 (2019), available at https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/articles/1362. Copyright Statement Copyright protected. Use of materials from this collection beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. Permission to publish or reproduce is required. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Colorado Law Faculty Scholarship at Colorado Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of Colorado Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Copyright 2019 by Bertrall L. Ross II & Douglas M. Spencer Printed in U.S.A. Vol. 114, No. 3 PASSIVE VOTER SUPPRESSION: CAMPAIGN MOBILIZATION AND THE EFFECTIVE DISFRANCHISEMENT OF THE POOR Bertrall L. Ross II & Douglas M. Spencer ABSTRACT—A recent spate of election laws tightened registration rules, reduced convenient voting opportunities, and required voters to show specific types of identification in order to vote. -
“Not As a Favor, Not As a Privilege, but As a Right”: Woman Suffragists, Race, Rights, and the Nineteenth Amendment
Western New England Law Review Volume 42 42 Issue 3 Article 4 2020 “NOT AS A FAVOR, NOT AS A PRIVILEGE, BUT AS A RIGHT”: WOMAN SUFFRAGISTS, RACE, RIGHTS, AND THE NINETEENTH AMENDMENT Joan Marie Johnson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.wne.edu/lawreview Recommended Citation Joan Marie Johnson, “NOT AS A FAVOR, NOT AS A PRIVILEGE, BUT AS A RIGHT”: WOMAN SUFFRAGISTS, RACE, RIGHTS, AND THE NINETEENTH AMENDMENT, 42 W. New Eng. L. Rev. 385 (2020), https://digitalcommons.law.wne.edu/lawreview/vol42/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Review & Student Publications at Digital Commons @ Western New England University School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western New England Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Western New England University School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WESTERN NEW ENGLAND LAW REVIEW Volume 42 2020 Issue 3 “NOT AS A FAVOR, NOT AS A PRIVILEGE, BUT AS A RIGHT”: WOMAN SUFFRAGISTS, RACE, RIGHTS, AND THE NINETEENTH AMENDMENT JOAN MARIE JOHNSON* This brief history of the woman suffrage movement shows how various suffragists believed the right to vote for women was a human right that all American citizens should possess, while other suffragists viewed their struggle as one for respect and protection from abusive men. These differences are particularly salient in the fraught role of black woman suffragists, who, while dedicated to the cause, were frequently unwelcome in the white-dominated state and national movements. In January 1910, white suffragist Alva Belmont met with three black suffragists—Irene Moorman, Sarah Garnet, and Maria Lawton—to discuss forming a black branch of Belmont’s suffrage organization. -
Carol Wheeler's "History of the Suffrage Movement from a Black
HISTORY OF THE SUFFRAGE MOVEMENT FROM A BLACK WOMAN’S PERSPECTIVE The month of March is National Women’s History Month and this year marks the 100th anniversary of the passage of the 19th Amendment giving women the right to vote. While most of us have heard stories and have seen images of white suffragettes, there’s usually not much mention of the contributions of people of color. I’d like to acknowledge the work of Native Americans, Asian, Hispanic, and other people of color in this endeavor. In this short time frame, I’m going to explore the women’s suffrage movement from a black woman’s perspective. In 1848, the first woman’s rights convention was held in Seneca Falls, NY led by such notables as Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucretia Mott, and Susan B. Anthony. No black women were in attendance. Let’s put this in historical context. In 1848, slavery was a booming business and most black women were otherwise occupied being enslaved or focused on pure survival. However, there were black women who spoke out for women’s suffrage, such as well-known former slave Sojourner Truth. The Civil War was fought from 1861to 1865. In 1865 the 13th Amendment abolished slavery. But it was the 15th Amendment giving black men the right to vote that shook up the women’s suffrage movement. Prior to the 15th Amendment, black and white suffragettes worked together. The proposed 15th Amendment split the movement into two camps. One group, led by Stanton and Anthony, opposed black men getting the vote BEFORE white women. -
Women's Suffrage Quiz
How much do you know about women’s suffrage? 1. Suffrage from the Latin word suffragium refers to… A) Those who suffered to obtain the right to vote B) A vote given in deciding a controversial question C) The sacrifices which must be made for representative government 2. What is the difference between the word suffragist and suffragette? A) Suffragist refers to males and suffragette refers to females. B) Suffragist was used to refer to women seeking the right to vote, whereas these women referred to themselves as suffragettes. C) Suffragette is a derogatory term while suffragist is not. 3. The Women’s Rights Convention was held in Seneca Falls in 1848. The document drafted at this convention was called… A) “The Inalienable Rights for Women” B) “The Declaration of the Rights of Women” C) “The Declaration of Sentiments” 4. The legislatures in Illinois, Michigan, and Wisconsin all ratified the 19th amendment on June 10, 1919. Wisconsin was given credit for being the first to ratify because… A) Its papers were the first to be filed in Washington, D.C. B) A legislator in Illinois delayed the vote in Springfield due to the birth of his daughter C) The official time stamp on Michigan’s papers was smudged and therefore judged invalid. 5. Early women’s suffragists were criticized for which of the following: (Choose two answers.) A) Lack of support for women of color B) Violence and destruction of property C) Association with the temperance (anti-alcohol) movement Match the national leaders of the women’s suffrage movement to the description: ___ Lucretia Mott (1793-1880) ___ Sojourner Truth (1797-1883) ___ Elizabeth Cady Stanton (1815-1902) ___ Mary Church Terrell (1863-1954) ___ Susan B. -
African American Male Ex-Felons' Perspectives Regarding Felon Disenfranchisement
Walden University ScholarWorks Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection 2021 African American Male Ex-Felons' Perspectives Regarding Felon Disenfranchisement Tymesha Alegra Whitehead Walden University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations Part of the Law Commons, and the Public Policy Commons This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Walden University College of Social and Behavioral Sciences This is to certify that the doctoral dissertation by Tymesha Alegra Whitehead has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made. Review Committee Dr. Clarence Williamson, Committee Chairperson, Criminal Justice Faculty Dr. Grace Telesco, Committee Member, Criminal Justice Faculty Dr. Tamara Mouras, University Reviewer, Criminal Justice Faculty Chief Academic Officer and Provost Sue Subocz, Ph.D. Walden University 2021 Abstract African American Male Ex-Felons’ Perspectives Regarding Felon Disenfranchisement by Tymesha Alegra Whitehead MS Criminal Justice, Kaplan University, 2014 BA Criminal Justice, Suny Empire State College, 2008 Proposal Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Criminal Justice Walden University February 2021 Abstract The tradition of disenfranchising those convicted in the United States of felony crimes has profound historical racial roots that have persisted for decades in the United States. The persistent practice of felon disenfranchisement in the 21st century challenges the essence of democracy, with over six million people disenfranchised.