DOCSLIB.ORG

Cumulative Index

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cumulative Index Boston College Law Review Volume 8 Article 15 Issue 4 Number 4 7-1-1967 Cumulative Index Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr Recommended Citation Cumulative Index, 8 B.C.L. Rev. 1017 (1967), http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr/vol8/iss4/15 This Cumulative Index is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CUMULATIVE INDEX TO VOLUME VIII 1966 - 1967 Case Index (Boldface type denotes cases which have been noted or annotated.) Cases Cited Page Cases Cited Page Abbott v. Anderson 985 Bartlett v. Administrator 48-49 Ablondi v. Board of Review 39-40 Bateman v. Ford Motor Co. 315-16 Abraham & Straus v. Teller 429 ff Bausch & Lomb Optical Co. Acquisto v. General Motors Corp. 53 348-49, 351 Aegis Prods., Inc. v. Arriflex Bayer Co. v. United Drug Co. 128 ff Corp. 86-89 Beacon Fed. Savings & Loan Aetna Ins. Co. v. Commonwealth Ass'n v. FHLBB 624 716-17 Beaunit Mills, Inc. 993-94 Aetna Ins. Co. v. Hyde 716 Berkey v. Third Ave. Ry. 981-83 Aetna Ins. Co. v. Travis 718 Benedict v. Ratner 106, 110 A. H. Bull S.S. Co. v. National Berne! Foam Prods. Co. 655 Marine Eng'rs Beneficial Ass'n 849 Berry Bros. Buick, Inc. v. Gen- Allen Bradley Co. v. Local 3, eral Motors Corp. 297 if, 309 ff IBEW 873-74 Big Y Supermarkets Inc. v. Mc- Allied Stores v. Funderburke 495-96 Culloch 778, 781-82 Alverez v. Administrator 46 Bird & Sons Sales Corp. v. Tobin American Airlines, Inc. v. CAB 104 ff • 135-146 Black & Decker Mfg. Co. 177, 195-96 American Banana Co. v. United Blue & Gold Stamps—U-Save Fruit Co. 683-84, 686 Premium Co. v. Sobieski 379 ff American Can Co. Board of Governors of Fed. Re- 790. 989, 990, 992, 994 serve Sys. v. Transamerica American Fed'n of Labor v. Corp. 361 NLRB 778 Board of Trade v. Johnson 986-87 American Potash & Chemical Boire v. Greyhound Corp. 779-80 Corp. 786-791, 993-94 Bolognesi v. United States 260 ff American Ship Bldg. v. NLRB Bonwit Teller, Inc. 799 ff 811, 862-63 Brechu v. Rapid Transit Co. 41 Apex Hosiery Co. v. Leader 895 ff Briskin v. White 975 ff Appalachian Elec. Power Co. 656 Broadwater v. Otto 282-83 Application of Chase Manhattan Brooks v. NLRB 658, 805 Bank 700 Brophy v. Cities Serv. Co. 357 Archer Laundry Co. 753-54 Brotherhood of R.R. Trainmen v. Aristocrat Linen Supply Co. 753 Atlantic Coast Line R.R. 666-72 Arrow Transp. Co. v. Southern Ry. Brotherhood of R.R. Trainmen v. 363-64 Chicago River & Ind. R.R. 670-71 Ashbacker Radio Corp. v. FCC Brotherhood of R.R. Trainmen v. 145-46 Toledo, P. & W.R.R. 160 Athens T.V. Cable, Inc. 777 Atkinson v. Sinclair Ref. Co. 812 Brotherhood of Ry. & S.S. Clerks Atlas Storage Div. 866 v. Florida E.C. Ry. 153-163 Attorney-General v. Barfried En- Brown & Root, Inc. 866 terprises Ltd. 222-24 Bullard Co. v. NLRB 778-81 Bullion v. Aetna Ins. Co. 715-16, 723 Bach v. Friden Calculating Mach. Burleson Unemployment Com- Co. 316 ff pensation Case 46 Badgett v. Department of Indus- Burnett v. New York Cent. R.R. 650 ff trial Relations 48 Banco Mexicano de Commercio e Industria v. Deutsche Bank 296 ff CAB v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. 141-42 Barney Motor Sales v. Cal Sales, Cannery Workers 886-87 Inc. 294, 304 Carey v. Westinghouse Corp. 1001 1017 BOSTON COLLEGE INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL LAW REVIEW Cases Cited Page Cases Cited Page Carlo Bianchi & Co. v. United' Fabert Motors, Inc. v. Ford Mo- States 7 tor Co. 296 Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp. v. Fafnir Bearing Co. v. NLRB 860 Review Bd. 52 Falcone v. Middlesex County Carroll v. American Fed'n of Medical Soc'y 374-76 Musicians 898-900 Fallick v. Kehr 972-81 Chemical Bank, New York Trust FCC v. Sanders Bros. Radio Sta- Co. v. Kheel 963-72 tion 910 Cintrone v. Hertz Truck Leasing Federal Baseball Club, Inc. v. and Rental Serv. 89-92 National League 343 ff, 346 City of Minot v. General Drivers Federation of Labor v. NLRB 199 Union No. 74 280-81, 286 Fibreboard Paper Prods. Co. v. City of Springfield v. ClouSe 287 ff NLRB .. 758-59, 852-53, 858, 873 ff Clavarella v. Salituri 976 First Nat'l City Bank v. Internal Commerce Trust Co. v. Wood- Revenue Serv. 699 bury 965-68 First Pa. Banking & Trust Co. Commissioner v. H. P. Hood & v. Montgomery County Bank Sons 1003 ff & Trust Co. 95 Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Light- Florida E.C. Ry. v. United States ing Co. 127, 129-30 154, 161 Conren, Inc. v. NLRB 652-59, 804 Foley Bros. v. Filardo 678-80, 684, 709 Continental Bank & Trust Co. Food Center, Inc. v. Food Fair v. Martin 621 If Stores, Inc. 168-74 Corn Exch. Nat'l Bank v. Klauder Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. Food 105 ff Fair, Inc. 169 Cox's Food Center v. Retail Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman 830, 837 Clerks 775 FPC v. Texaco, Inc. 140 Crane Packing Co. 796 Frank Fisher Merchandising Crown Coat Front Co. v. United Corp. v. Ritz Drug Co. • 384 States 646, 648 ff, 650 Fratt v. Robinson 356, 358 Cumberland Shoe Corp. 745 Freed v. Szabo Food Serv., Inc. 355 Cunard S.S. Co. v. Mellon 682-83 Friden Calculating Mach. Co. 994 Frisch's Big Boy Ill-Mar, Inc. 185 Dahlberg Bros., Inc. v. Ford Mo- FTC v. Consolidated Foods Corp. tor Co. 316 945-46 David B. Findlay, Inc. v. Findlay FTC v. Dean Foods Co. 360-69 325-26, 328 FTC v. International Paper Co. 361 Department of Industrial Rela- FTC v. Procter & Gamble Co. tions v. Stone 42 936, 940, 947-49 Deshler Broom Factory v. Kinney 44 Detroit Newspaper Publishers • Ass'n v. NLRB 809-811 Gale Prods. 801 Diner's Club, Inc. v. Whited Garden Check Cashing Serv., Inc. 494-97, 509-10, 515 ff v. First Nat'l City Bank 265 District 50, UMW v. NLRB 857 ff Garden State Hosiery Co. 177-80 Doyle v. Gordon 294 ff Garvin v. American Motors Sales Corp. 310-11, 313 ff E. A. Coronis Associates v. M. Garwin Corp. 756, 889-90 Gordon Constr. Co. 81-86 General Drivers, Local 89 v. Riss Easton Publications Co. v. FCC 910 & Co. 822 E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. General Elec. Co. 751-53, 989-90 787, 790-91, 995-96 General Elec. Co. v. Two Guys Ekco Prods. Co. v. FTC 946-47 ff from Harrison England v. Christensen 338 382 Erie Firefighters Local 293 v. General Motors Corp. 800 Gardner 282, 286 Gooding Amusement Co. 1009-10 ff Erie R.R. v. Tompkins 104 ff, 584 ff Graber Mfg. Co. v. Dixon 619 ff Essex County & Vicinity Dist. Great Lakes Carbon Corp. v. Council of Carpenters 775 NLRB 863-65 Evening News Ass'n 809 Greater Del. Valley Fed. Savings Excelsior Underwear, Inc. & Loan Ass'n v. FHLBB 619 ff, 620 794-95, 891 ff Great Scott Food Mkt., Inc. v. Ex parte Bradstreet 362 ff Sunderland Wonder, Inc. 171-72 Ex parte Crane 362 ff Gulf Ref. Co. v. Plotnick 489 1018 CASE INDEX Cases Cited Page Cases Cited Page Gulf Ref. Co. v. Williams Roofing In the Matter of Cohen 41 Co. 491-92, 496-97, 505, 507 In the Matter of Deep River Tim- Guss v. Utah Labor Relations Bd. 773 ber Co. 47 In the Matter of Elkins-Dell Mfg. Co. 104 if Harris v. Balk 150 In the Matter of Grand Jury In- Hawaii Meat Co. v. NLRB 157 ff vestigation of the Shipping Haynes v. United States Pipe . & Indus. 688, 701 Foundry Co. 830-36, 842 ff In the Matter of Laskin 104 ff Hearst Consol. Publications, Inc. 809 In the Matter of North River Helms v. Holmes 973 ff Logging Co. 50-51 Henningsen v. Bloomfield Mo- In the Matter of Poison Lumber tors, Inc. 90 & Shingle Mills 31 Henry v. FCC 910 In the Matter of Vingoe 53 Hialeah Race Course, Inc. 776 In the Matter of Wheatland Elec. Highway Truck Drivers, Local Prods. Co. 767 107 874-76 In the Matter of Yale Express Hoban v. United Aircraft Corp. 806 Sys., Inc. 101-13 Hogg v. Ruffner 443 ff Isbrandtsen Co. v. District 2, Ma- Holmberg, Inc. 787, 789-91, 996 rine Eng'rs Beneficial Ass'n 848 Hot Shoppes, Inc. 181 Houston Insulation Contractors Jackson v. First Nat'l Bank 93-96 Ass'n v. NLRB 874, 878-80 Jackson v. S.S. "Archimedes" H. P. Hood & Sons v. Du Mond 345 682-83, 685 Hudson Hosiery Co. 186-97 Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. Kent 302 ff Humble Oil & Ref. Co. v. Waters James Blackstone Memorial Li- 489 ff brary Ass'n v. Gulf, M. & 0. Humphrey v. Moore 838, 840, 843 R.R. 358 Hurn v. Oursler 784 ff Jewel Tea Co. 792 John P. Serpa, Inc. 747 Ings v. Ferguson 700 Johnson v. Unemployment Ins. Inland Steel Co. v. NLRB 859 Comm'n 33 ff In re Connors 976 ff Johnston Grain Co. v. NLRB 806 In re Devereaux 976 John Wanamaker Philadelphia v.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Department Stores on Sale: an Antitrust Quandary Mark D
    Georgia State University Law Review Volume 26 Article 1 Issue 2 Winter 2009 March 2012 Department Stores on Sale: An Antitrust Quandary Mark D. Bauer Follow this and additional works at: https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/gsulr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Mark D. Bauer, Department Stores on Sale: An Antitrust Quandary, 26 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. (2012). Available at: https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/gsulr/vol26/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Publications at Reading Room. It has been accepted for inclusion in Georgia State University Law Review by an authorized editor of Reading Room. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Bauer: Department Stores on Sale: An Antitrust Quandary DEPARTMENT STORES ON SALE: AN ANTITRUST QUANDARY Mark D. BauerBauer*• INTRODUCTION Department stores occupy a unique role in American society. With memories of trips to see Santa Claus, Christmas window displays, holiday parades or Fourth of July fIreworks,fireworks, department stores­stores- particularly the old downtown stores-are often more likely to courthouse.' engender civic pride than a city hall building or a courthouse. I Department store companies have traditionally been among the strongest contributors to local civic charities, such as museums or symphonies. In many towns, the department store is the primary downtown activity generator and an important focus of urban renewal plans. The closing of a department store is generally considered a devastating blow to a downtown, or even to a suburban shopping mall. Many people feel connected to and vested in their hometown department store.
    [Show full text]
  • General Background
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Earth and Mineral Sciences RESTRUCTURING DEPARTMENT STORE GEOGRAPHIES: THE LEGACIES OF EXPANSION AND CONSOLIDATION IN PHILADELPHIA’S JOHN WANAMAKER AND STRAWBRIDGE & CLOTHIER, 1860-1960 A Thesis in Geography by Wesley J Stroh © 2008 Wesley J Stroh Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science August 2008 The thesis of Wesley J. Stroh was reviewed and approved* by the following: Deryck W. Holdsworth Professor of Geography Thesis Adviser Roger M. Downs Professor of Geography Karl Zimmerer Professor of Geography Head of the Department of Geography *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. ABSTRACT RESTRUCTURING DEPARTMENT STORE GEOGRAPHIES: THE LEGACIES OF EXPANSION AND CONSOLIDATION IN PHILADELPHIA’S JOHN WANAMAKER AND STRAWBRIDGE & CLOTHIER, 1860-1960 Consolidation in the retail sector continues to restructure the department store, and the legacies of earlier forms of the department store laid the foundation for this consolidation. Using John Wanamaker’s and Strawbridge & Clothier, antecedents of Macy’s stores in Philadelphia, I undertake a case study of the development, through expansion and consolidation, which led to a homogenized department store retail market in the Philadelphia region. I employ archival materials, biographies and histories, and annual reports to document and characterize the development and restructuring Philadelphia’s department stores during three distinct phases: early expansions, the first consolidations into national corporations, and expansion through branch stores and into suburban shopping malls. In closing, I characterize the processes and structural legacies which department stores inherited by the latter half of the 20th century, as these legacies are foundational to national-scale retail homogenization.
    [Show full text]
  • Retail History Data
    Retail History Data Taken from Our Video on the History of American Retailing 12 Largest US Metropolitan Areas, 1930 City Metropolitan Area Population, 1930 NY 10,901 Chicago 4,365 Philadelphia 2,847 Los Angeles 2,318 Boston 2,308 Detroit 2,105 Pittsburgh 1,954 St. Louis 1,294 San Francisco 1,290 Cleveland 1,195 Baltimore 949 Minneapolis 832 Estimated Biggest Single US Department Stores, 1963 Store City Sales ($MM) Macy’s NY 168 Field’s Chicago 135 Hudson’s Detroit 110 A&S Brooklyn 100 Jordan Marsh Boston 90 Lazarus Columbus 85 Bloomingdale’s NY 78 Hudson’s Northland, Detroit 75 Dayton’s Minneapolis 72 Rich’s Atlanta 70 Kaufmann’s Pittsburgh 67 Wanamaker’s Philadelphia 67 Famous-Barr St. Louis 65 Carson Pirie Scott Chicago 60 Filene’s Boston 59 Saks 5th Avenue NY 59 Highest Single Store Revenues Adjusted for Inflation to 2010 Dollars Store City Year Sales in 2010 $ (MM) AT Stewart NY 1873 $ 217 Wanamaker Philadelphia 1902 $ 442 Macy’s New York 1906 $ 403 Field’s Chicago 1906 $ 610 Bon Marche Paris 1906 $ 965 Macy’s NY 1930 $ 1286 Hudson’s Detroit 1953 $ 1242 ? Field’s Chicago 1962 $ 969 Hudson’s Northland 1962 $ 538 Japanese Stores Tokyo 1990s-2000s $ 2500-3000 A&P Number of Stores Year Number of Stores 1860 1 1865 4 1870 11 1881 100 1890 150 1901 198 1906 291 1910 372 1912 480 A&P Number of Stores Year Number of Stores 1912 480 1913 585 1914 991 1915 1,817 1916 2,866 1917 3,782 1918 3,799 1919 4,224 1920 4,621 1923 9,303 1925 14,034 1927 15,671 Largest Grocery Chains 1929 Chain Base Stores Sales ($MM) A&P NY 15,418 $1054 Kroger Cinci
    [Show full text]
  • Macy's, Inc. Announces Executive Management Changes
    January 28, 2013 Macy’s, Inc. Announces Executive Management Changes CINCINNATI--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Macy’s, Inc. (NYSE:M) today announced a series of changes to its senior executive leadership team, effective immediately. Thomas L. Cole is retiring as Macy’s, Inc.’s chief administrative officer after an exceptional 41-year career with Macy’s, Inc. and its predecessor companies. He will remain with the company through May 2013 to affect a smooth transition to several other executives. His responsibilities have been re-assigned as follows: William S. Allen has joined Macy’s, effective today, as chief human resources officer. Allen, a seasoned corporate human resources executive who previously served as senior vice president of AP Moller-Maersk A/S, joins the Macy’s executive committee and reports to Terry J. Lundgren, chairman, president and chief executive officer. Allen will oversee Macy’s, Inc.’s human resources, diversity strategies, and corporate communications and external affairs functions. In addition, Allen will have administrative responsibility for the law function that reports directly to Lundgren. Robert B. Harrison, previously Macy’s executive vice president for omnichannel strategy, is assuming the newly-created role of chief omnichannel officer, reporting to Lundgren. He also will join the company’s executive committee. In addition to his existing role managing the development of strategies to closely integrate the company’s stores, online and mobile activities, Harrison will assume responsibility for systems and technology, logistics and related operating functions. Karen M. Hoguet, Macy’s, Inc. chief financial officer, will assume additional responsibility for credit and customer services, real estate, non-merchandise purchasing and sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • A Department Store, Tacoma, Washington Thesis Report
    A DEPARTMENT STORE, TACOMA, WASHINGTON THESIS REPORT FOR DEGREE OF MASTER IN ARCHITECTURE MASSACnUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SEPTEMBER 9, 1949 DANIEL M. STREISSGUTH" L. B. ANDERSON, HEAD OF DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE 467 Beacon Street Boston 15, Massachusetts September 9, 1949 Dean William W. Wurster School of Architecture and Planning Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts Dear Dean Wurster, This thesis report, a department store in Tacoma, Washington, is respectfully submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Architecture. Sincerely, Daniel M. Streissguth TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD . ... .. .. ... .. .. - DEVELOPMENT OF THE DEPARTMENT STORE . .3 THE CITY OF TACOMA Retail Trade .. .... o.... 12 A Brief History and Geography . 15 THE COMPANY . ... ... ... .. 18 PROGRAM Size of Store .. .. .. .. .. 21 Parking Provisions .... ... 23 Space Subdivision Within the Store . 25 Architectural Character . ..... .. 28 SELECTION OF ThE SITE . 31 THE SOLUTION Preliminaries . ... .... ... .. 35 Final . ... ... ... .. .. 38 BIBLIOGRAPHY ....... .... .. 42 FOREWURD The health and vigor of the U.S. department store is attested to by continuing store plant expansion throughout the nation. In nearly every major center, the situation is the same. For examples: Jordan Marsh Co., Boston, is expending millions on its mammoth new downtown store, and is building two new branches; Macy's, Altman's , Bloomingdale's, and Lord & Taylor's - all have established outposts in New York suburbs; both Rich's and the Davidson-Paxton Co. are enlarging their downtown Atlanta stores, and Davidson's plans satellite stores in Columbus, S. Car., and Augusta, Ga.; Neiman-Marcus Co., Dallas, plans expansion throughout the Southwest, and will build stores in University Park (Dallas), Amarillo, iouston, and Phoenix.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wonderful World of the Department Store in Historical Perspective: a Comprehensive International Bibliography, Partially Annotated
    The Wonderful World of the Department Store in Historical Perspective: A Comprehensive International Bibliography, Partially Annotated By Robert D. Tamilia PhD Professor of Marketing Department of Marketing École des sciences de la gestion University of Quebec at Montreal [email protected] Revised and updated periodically (Last update: July, 2011) Note : The following short introduction to the department store was first written when this bibliographical project was initiated by the author in 2000. Since then, the introduction has been updated but is still incomplete. Over the past 10 years, new information sources on the department store have been found which makes it near impossible to summarize in this introduction the history of this retail institution which evolved over time along with the history of retailing. The wealth of information on the department store over the past 150 years is quite impressive especially since the 1970s when historical research in the social sciences became increasing popular among historians of all stripes but less so in academic marketing. A more complete introduction to the wonderful world of department store can be found in Tamilia (2003) and Tamilia and Reid (2007) . Abstract The paper has two main objectives. The first is to provide a short summary of what the department store is all about. There is a need to discuss its historical role not only in marketing and retailing, but also in society and the world in general. The next objective is to provide social historians and other historical researchers with the most comprehensive and complete reference list on the department store ever compiled.
    [Show full text]
  • Carter Hawley Hale and Their Competitors in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom
    CARTER HAWLEY HALE AND THEIR COMPETITORS IN THE UNITED STATES, CANADA, AND THE UNITED KINGDOM An Honors Thesis (ID 499) By Lin E. Creech Thesis Advisor Ball State University Muncie. Indiana November, 1982 ({, '. 1 , ,~ This paper centers around Carter Hawley Hale and explores many of their competitors. The competitiors were chosen on the basis of their own marketing thrust, merchandising target. or management competence. Each has been studied from a view from the top management. The management philosophies, marketing strategies, and financial reports and outlooks are all covered. My deepest and sincere thanks to Mr. T. J. Ault for iall his help and encouragement throughout this project. RETAIL OUTLOOK The Conference Board at New York that plots financial trends has come out with figures that have a significant impact on retailing in the future. By 1990, only eight years away, one in five U.S. households will have an income that, adjusted for inflation, would equal $40,000 or more today. Today, only one in 10 houselolds tops the $40,000 line. This comes when the number of single person house­ holds is rising, currently 23%. Demand is growing for expensive, high-quality luxury goods and services such as home computers, video recorders, food processors, fine and stylish clothing, travel, etc •• And those prepared to provide such symbols of the good life E~xpect ot do very well. 2 '.~ c.; \" ?~, .. ~:~~-. --..:;...:::~--"~ :=-~~.;!-:.:.:--=.. " . .J v' v' -.4- "Y'-­ ..., .~ , v , , .~ ... -i ~ ~ ..!.. .:) f ,. -, ,. ~. , . .r> " i -~..1 " -I- , ! .- , ! .).. 'Y' -, 1 ~ : :...1 ,"~ ..J..- c· ,.... "."- 'I T'" , ' , c: J r • 1 , .'. c ~ .""; ...L ,_ ....... ','" + .+ ..,-, ')., :-:l l.,., • . 1 ~.... ''-, ,1 r • •• .., _ ~ • -4- J·1 +-! ~ .' + '1 -!-', 1 , -+- " \'1 , , • ~L ;r .
    [Show full text]
  • Cleveland's Leading Downtown Department Stores: a Business Legacy
    Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU Cleveland Memory Books Fall 2014 "Let's Go Shopping at the Square" Cleveland's Leading Downtown Department Stores: A Business Legacy Richard Klein Cleveland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevmembks Part of the Architectural History and Criticism Commons, Interior Architecture Commons, Marketing Commons, Sales and Merchandising Commons, and the Urban, Community and Regional Planning Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Recommended Citation Klein, Richard, ""Let's Go Shopping at the Square" Cleveland's Leading Downtown Department Stores: A Business Legacy" (2014). Cleveland Memory. 25. https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevmembks/25 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Books at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cleveland Memory by an authorized administrator of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “LET’S GO SHOPPING AT THE SQUARE” CLEVELAND’S LEADING DOWNTOWN DEPARTMENT STORES A BUSINESS LEGACY BY RICHARD KLEIN, PH.D EISBN-13: 978-1-936323-48-7 EISBN-10: 1-936323-48-6 This digital edition was prepared by MSL Academic Endeavors, the imprint of the Michael Schwartz Library at Cleveland State University, 2014. Permission for MSL Academic Endeavors and Cleveland Memory Project to reprint granted by the author(s). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This book is a tribute to the eight major downtown Cleveland department stores and their many loyal customers. For over 150 years, these large stores dominated the local retail scene. They represented exciting places that not only provided a full range of goods and services all under one roof, but also, offered a special shopping adventure every time their customers visited.
    [Show full text]
  • The Real Story Behind the Cmbx.6 Debunking the Next “Big Short”
    OCTOBER 2019 THE REAL STORY BEHIND THE CMBX.6 DEBUNKING THE NEXT “BIG SHORT” Brian Phillips Director—Commercial Real Estate Credit Research Kimberly Chan Research Analyst—Commercial Real Estate Credit Research Eric Goldstein, CFA Research Analyst—Commercial Real Estate Credit Research John Huang, CFA Research Analyst—Commercial Real Estate Credit Research IN THIS PAPER: The CMBX.6 has become such a popular short by speculators placing bets on mall closings that it has been profiled in the media as the next “big short.” It’s true that as many as a third of American malls won’t survive the upheaval in the retail sector. But that narrative conceals other realities. In fact, the American mall isn’t dying—it’s evolving to meet modern consumer demands. And thanks to the specific property composition of the CMBX.6, the loan losses in its collateral pool will likely be modest. As a result, returns on the CMBX.6 are likely to be far higher than short sellers expect. In this paper, we present the powerful research that illuminates our view. For institutional investor or financial representative use only. Not for inspection by, distribution or quotation to, the general public. SHINING A LIGHT ON A CONTROVERSIAL TRADE The CMBX.6. The acronym has splashed across headlines and become a source of controversy on Wall Street. It’s such a popular trade by speculators placing bets on store and mall closings that shorting the CMBX.6, a commercial real estate mortgage index, has been profiled in the media as the next “big short.” Controversy has brewed because of short sellers’ assertions that the American mall is dying and that near-term defaults and losses on the CMBX.6 loan pool will therefore be high.
    [Show full text]