Exoneration in Sweden
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Consequences of Failing to Admit Guilt at Parole Hearings Daniel S
MEDWED_TRANSMITTED.DOC2 2/26/2008 1:51 PM The Innocent Prisoner’s Dilemma: Consequences of Failing to Admit Guilt at Parole Hearings Daniel S. Medwed∗ INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 493 I. THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF PAROLE ................................................ 497 A. HISTORICAL ORIGINS AND PURPOSES OF PAROLE ................................ 497 B. PAROLE RELEASE DECISION-MAKING: CONTEMPORARY STANDARDS AND POLICIES .................................................................................... 504 II. THE EFFECT OF PAROLE RELEASE DECISION-MAKING NORMS ON THE INNOCENT ............................................................................................... 513 A. PAROLE: AN INNOCENCE OPTION OF LAST RESORT ............................. 518 B. PRESSURE ON INNOCENT INMATES TO “ADMIT” GUILT ........................ 523 III. ADMISSIONS OF GUILT AND THE PAROLE RELEASE DECISION RECONSIDERED ....................................................................................... 529 A. THE DANGER OF ASSUMING THE LITIGATION PROCESS ACCURATELY FILTERS THE GUILTY FROM THE INNOCENT ......................................... 530 B. POTHOLES ON THE PATH TO REDEMPTION THROUGH THE PAROLE PROCESS ........................................................................................... 532 IV. SUGGESTIONS FOR REFORM .................................................................... 541 A. LIMITATIONS ON THE SUBSEQUENT USE OF STATEMENTS FROM PAROLE HEARINGS ........................................................................... -
Compensation Chart by State
Updated 5/21/18 NQ COMPENSATION STATUTES: A NATIONAL OVERVIEW STATE STATUTE WHEN ELIGIBILITY STANDARD WHO TIME LIMITS MAXIMUM AWARDS OTHER FUTURE CONTRIBUTORY PASSED OF PROOF DECIDES FOR FILING AWARDS CIVIL PROVISIONS LITIGATION AL Ala.Code 1975 § 29-2- 2001 Conviction vacated Not specified State Division of 2 years after Minimum of $50,000 for Not specified Not specified A new felony 150, et seq. or reversed and the Risk Management exoneration or each year of incarceration, conviction will end a charges dismissed and the dismissal Committee on claimant’s right to on grounds Committee on Compensation for compensation consistent with Compensation Wrongful Incarceration can innocence for Wrongful recommend discretionary Incarceration amount in addition to base, but legislature must appropriate any funds CA Cal Penal Code §§ Amended 2000; Pardon for Not specified California Victim 2 years after $140 per day of The Department Not specified Requires the board to 4900 to 4906; § 2006; 2009; innocence or being Compensation judgment of incarceration of Corrections deny a claim if the 2013; 2015; “innocent”; and Government acquittal or and Rehabilitation board finds by a 2017 declaration of Claims Board discharge given, shall assist a preponderance of the factual innocence makes a or after pardon person who is evidence that a claimant recommendation granted, after exonerated as to a pled guilty with the to the legislature release from conviction for specific intent to imprisonment, which he or she is protect another from from release serving a state prosecution for the from custody prison sentence at underlying conviction the time of for which the claimant exoneration with is seeking transitional compensation. -
Stenastiftelsens Arsbok 2019-1.Pdf
STEN A OLSSONS KULTURSTIPENDIUM 2019 2 0 1 9 INDEX FÖRORD 08 RYGGMÄRGSSKADECENTRUM 12 DAVID DENCIK 28 SARAH KLANG 50 MASAYOSHI OYA 72 MATTIAS NORDKVIST 94 MARTHA OSSOWSKA PERSSON 120 MALIN WÄTTRING 142 EVA LÖFDAHL 164 CLAES ERIKSSON 186 MOTIVERINGAR 214 CURRICULUM VITAE 218 MOTTAGARE AV STEN A OLSSONS KULTURSTIPENDIUM 226 08 FÖRORD 09 NYA FORMER FÖR LÄRANDE, kunskapsförmedling och innova- Men 2019 års utan jämförelse största investering är stödet om tioner fortsätter att vara något av en röd tråd i Stenastiftelsens sammanlagt 50 miljoner kronor till uppbyggandet av Universeums satsningar. 3 juni 2019 invigdes, under högtidliga och festliga visualiseringslabb, under ledning av professor Anders Ynnerman, former, Ryggmärgsskadecentrum Göteborg, som under en upp- världsledande inom sitt område. Här sammanfaller fera av stiftel- byggnadsperiod av fem år beviljats stöd om cirka 34 miljoner sens fokusområden: satsningar på nya innovativa lärandeprocesser, kronor från Stenastiftelsen. Sedan etableringen 2017 har arbetet nydanande teknik och mångdisciplinära samarbeten. Den nya fortskridit i snabb takt. Målet är att detta än så länge unika visualiseringstekniken blir tillgänglig för publik i labbstationer projekt skall bli självfnansierande efter 2021. Centrets utveck- och kommer att kunna användas och utnyttjas i fera olika syften lingspotential är stor och arbetet mycket lovande. I årets katalog och sammanhang. Med hjälp av tekniken kan en djupare förstå- fnns en längre intervju med centrets projektledare Gunilla else och insikt uppnås – om mikrokosmos och makrokosmos, om Åhrén, där syfte och framtidsplaner belyses. rymden, människokroppen, stadsmiljön eller klimatet – för att Det är alltid lika glädjande att ta del av de framgångar som bara ge några exempel. På sikt kommer säkert samarbeten mellan såväl de tidigare kulturstipendiaterna som forskningsprojekten olika institutioner och discipliner att etableras för att dra nytta röner, samt hur stiftelsens uttalade ambition – att stödet skall av de nya upptäckter som avtäcks. -
Compensation for Wrongful Conviction, Wrongful Incarceration, and Exoneration
68-West–Statehouse, 300 SW 10th Ave. Topeka, Kansas 66612-1504 (785) 296-3181 ◆ FAX (785) 296-3824 [email protected] http://www.kslegislature.org/klrd December 27, 2017 COMPENSATION FOR WRONGFUL CONVICTION, WRONGFUL INCARCERATION, AND EXONERATION Exoneration Overview The National Registry of Exonerations1 (Registry) maintains the country’s largest database of exonerations. According to the Registry, 2,141 persons have been exonerated nationwide since 1989. For purposes of the Registry, a person is considered to have been exonerated if he or she was convicted of a crime and later was either: (1) declared to be factually innocent by a government official or agency with the authority to make that declaration; or (2) relieved of all the consequences of the criminal conviction by a government official or body with the authority to take that action. The official action may be: (i) a complete pardon by a governor or other competent authority, whether or not the pardon is designated as based on innocence; (ii) an acquittal of all charges factually related to the crime for which the person was originally convicted; or (iii) a dismissal of all charges related to the crime for which the person was originally convicted, by a court or by a prosecutor with the authority to enter that dismissal. The pardon, acquittal, or dismissal must have been the result, at least in part, of evidence of innocence that either (i) was not presented at the trial at which the person was convicted; or (ii) if the person pled guilty, was not known to the defendant and the defense attorney, and to the court, at the time the plea was entered. -
15A0021n.06 No. 13-3882 UNITED STATES COURT OF
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 15a0021n.06 No. 13-3882 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellee, ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE v. ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT ) COURT FOR THE DONTE BOOKER ) NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ) OHIO Defendant-Appellant. ) ) ) Before: MCKEAGUE and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges; HOOD, District Judge.* KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judge. Cleveland police officers and an ATF agent tricked Donte Booker into attempting to possess cocaine with the intent to sell it, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846. Booker appeals his conviction, arguing that the government entrapped him as a matter of law. Booker also argues that the district court should have allowed the jury to hear evidence about his wrongful conviction for an unrelated rape. We affirm. I. Booker served 17 years in prison for a 1987 rape he did not commit. After his release, a DNA test proved his innocence and the convictions were vacated. Ohio later paid Booker $618,000 to settle his wrongful-conviction lawsuit. * The Honorable Joseph M. Hood, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation. United States v. Booker No. 13-3882 The sting operation at issue here took place several years later. In October 2012 an informant, Daisetta Harris, told Cleveland Detective Todd Clark that Booker had asked her to help him rob drugs and money from stash houses. Detective Clark set up a sting operation to catch Booker. At Detective Clark’s behest, Harris told Booker that she knew two people who might be willing to help with a robbery: a woman named Angelique, and Angelique’s drug- courier boyfriend, Andre. -
Unraveling Unlawful Entrapment Anthony M
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 94 Article 1 Issue 4 Summer Summer 2004 Unraveling Unlawful Entrapment Anthony M. Dillof Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Anthony M. Dillof, Unraveling Unlawful Entrapment, 94 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 827 (2003-2004) This Criminal Law is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 009 1-4169/04/9404-0827 THE JOURNALOF CRIMINAL LAW& CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 94, No. 4 Copyright ©2004 by Northwesten University, School of Law Printed in U.S.A. UNRAVELING UNLAWFUL ENTRAPMENT ANTHONY M. DILLOF* I. INTRODUCTION Entrapment is as old as a pleasant garden, a forbidden fruit, and a subtle snake. "The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat," pleaded Eve in response to an accusing Lord God.' Early English cases report instances of citizens being lured into crime so they might be apprehended. 2 Nineteenth century American cases similarly record examples of persons tempted to illegality for the purpose of subjecting them to criminal sanctions. Entrapment as a social phenomenon has long been with us. .Associate Professor of Law, Wayne State University Law School. A.B., Harvard University; J.D., Columbia University School of Law; LL.M., Columbia University School of Law. I thank Anthony Duff, Stuart Green, and Peter Henning, whose insightful comments and critiques should in no way be construed as endorsements. -
Entrapment and Terrorism Dru Stevenson
Boston College Law Review Volume 49 Article 3 Issue 1 Number 1 1-1-2008 Entrapment and Terrorism Dru Stevenson Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr Part of the National Security Law Commons Recommended Citation Dru Stevenson, Entrapment and Terrorism, 49 B.C.L. Rev. 125 (2008), http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr/vol49/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ENTRAPMENT AND TERRORISM DRU STEVENSON * Abstract: Antiterrorism is a national priority and undercover sting opera- dons are a main antiterrorism tool. As our legal system's primary device for regulating undercover stings, the scope and vigor of the entrapment defense will impact the effectiveness of antiterrorism stings. The federal courts follOw the subjective test of entrapment, focusing on whether the • defendant was predisposed to commit the crime, or if rather the govern- ment induced the defendant to breach a legal norm. This Article argues that given the difficulty of preventing terrorist acts and the civil liberties implications of intrusive surveillance—the alternative to stings—there should be a rebuttable presumption that anyone who provides material support to terrorism was predisposed to do so. This Article argues that terrorism is such a heinous crime that it is unlikely the government could induce someone to support such criminals unless the person was one of the few predisposed to do so. -
Säter Hospital, Monday, 2 June 2008
SÄTER HOSPITAL, MONDAY, 2 JUNE 2008 THE SERIAL KILLER, sadist and cannibal Sture Bergwall had not been receiving visitors for the past seven years. I was filled with nervous anticipation as I was let into the main guarded entrance at the regional forensic psychiatric clinic in Säter. ‘Hannes Råstam, Swedish Television. I’m here to see Sture Berg- wall . .’ I dropped my press pass into the little stainless- steel drawer under the bulletproof glass between me and the guard. He confirmed that my visit had been logged and approved. ‘Go through the security gate. Don’t touch the door!’ I obeyed the scratchy voice from the speaker, passed through an automatic door, then a couple of metal detectors and finally through one more automatic door into a waiting room where a care assistant rummaged through my shoulder bag. I followed my guide’s firm steps through an inexplicable system of corridors, stairs and elevators. Her heels tapped against the concrete floors; then silence, the rattling of keys at every new steel barrier, the bleep of electronic locks and slamming of armoured doors. Thomas Quick had confessed to more than thirty murders. Six unan- imous courts had found him guilty of the murders of eight people. After the last verdict in 2001 he withdrew, announced a ‘time out’, reassumed his old name – Sture Bergwall – and went quiet. In the seven years that followed, a heated debate about whether Quick was 657EE_txt.indd 3 5/23/13 9:37 AM 4 HANNES RÅSTAM a serial killer or a pathological liar had bubbled up at regular intervals. -
Most Controversial Exoneration Death Penalty Law Case
Most Controversial Exoneration Death Penalty Law Case Konstantin inculpated his protists peens essentially, but conglobate Wilmer never dueling so wanly. Dicephalous Roth mute: he moisturize his wagon-lits surlily and doltishly. Phylloid and tarsal Rodd loathes her messuages impanelled or licences synchronously. Sattazahn decision by accident that it to keep it is most death In Singapore which has by nature the highest rate of execution per capita of any. In 1960 his death case was commuted to life imprisonment Truscott was the youngest person maybe be sentenced to constant in Canada and show case provided. Many would say the domestic penalty is reasonable because it scares people away for doing things that are illegal however many others say there usually a potential of executing an office man one says justice retribution and punishment the tablet side says that execution is murder. Ginia law imposed the death penalty remains a third stealing offense6 Specifically a first. Methods of Execution and Their Effect on the ant of favor Death. For most controversial choice for crimes deserve death are most controversial exoneration death penalty law case for their investigation. Read more simply these historic racial discrimination court cases and learn. 135 exonerations in the Modern Era from specific row Florida has had 22. Death came Just Facts. Dna profiles from the effort to group two defendants before used disproportionately applied the most controversial death penalty case law, or raping children. Court denied a hero-minute stay of execution11 Davis's death inside a seminal. A lawyer defends a black stairs against an undeserved rape charge. -
Download the Quick and the Dead
The Quick and the Dead 17th August 2020 “The operation was successful but the patient died.” - Anon. “Teach your kids about compounding: put your money in a savings account and watch it double every 19,876 years.” - Morgan Housel. “We have kept interest rates at 0.1%. Vote 9-0” - Tweet by the Bank of England, who seem bizarrely proud of themselves. “Successful investing is about having people agree with you.. later.” - James Grant. Charles Zelmanovits was murdered in Piteå, Sweden in 1976. Johan Asplund was murdered in Sundsvall in 1980. Marinus and Jannie Stegehuis, a Dutch couple on a camping holiday, were murdered in Appojaure, Sweden in 1984. Yenon Levi, a tourist from Israel, was murdered in Rörshyttan, Sweden in 1988. Therese Johannesen was murdered in Drammen, Norway in 1988. Trine Jensen was murdered in Oslo in 1981. Gry Storvik was murdered in Oslo in 1985. All of these murders went unsolved until Sture Bergwall, who would subsequently change his name to Thomas Quick, confessed to every one them in the mid-1990s. He was convicted of all eight murders and would ultimately spend 20 years in a locked psychiatric clinic, Säter Hospital, which has been likened to a Swedish Broadmoor. Just one problem: he made everything up. This extraordinary story was made into a documentary film in 2015 – The Confessions of Thomas Quick. It is difficult to believe that Bergwall’s fancies ever successfully took flight. Dan Josefsson, an award-winning Swedish journalist, comments: 1 It was ludicrous. His stories were ridiculous. Nothing added up. He couldn’t show any hidden bodies or people who disappeared – ever. -
Zahraniční Tituly V České Kinodistribuci V Roce 2020
Úvod Kompilací Zahraniční filmy v české kinodistribuci 2020 předkládá Národní filmový archiv široké veřejnosti přehled všech zahraničních audiovizuálních děl, která v období od 1. ledna do 31. prosince 2020 byla v premiéře uvedena distribučními společnostmi v kinech na území České republiky. Jednotlivé tituly byly zpracovány na základně přístupných údajů Unie filmových distributorů a samotných distribučních společností. Získaná data byla revidována, zpřesňována, ověřována a doplňována podle zákonné oznamovací povinnosti (zákon o audiovizi číslo 496/2012 Sb. s účinností od 1. ledna 2013), úvodních a závěrečných filmových titulků, tisku, zahraničních internetových databází a dalších relevantních materiálů, pramenů a zdrojů. Po úvodním přehledu všech sto šestnácti v kinodistribuci nasazených filmů (pokud není uvedeno jinak, jde o dlouhometrážní díla) následuje hlavní část, abecedně seřazený soupis snímků v podobě hesel s filmografickými, technickými, produkčními a distribučními údaji a s informativními texty. V závěru publikace je přehled distribuovaných filmů seřazený chronologicky podle data české premiéry, dále podle země původu, podle distribučních společností. A zvláštní přehled tvoří filmy, které byly v kinech uvedeny v národní úpravě – v dabované verzi (zbylým snímkům bylo zpravidla ponecháno původní znění a byly opatřeny českými podtitulky). V jednotlivých seznamech jsou dále vedeny údaje, zda se jedná o součást pásma, obnovenou premiéru, film krátkometrážní či středometrážní a u koprodukčních snímků jsou zmíněny rovněž všechny zúčastněné země. Pro úplnost připojujeme taktéž soupis českých a českých koprodukčních snímků uvedených ve sledovaném roce v tuzemské kinodistribuci. Jejich podrobné údaje jsou k dohledání rovněž v internetové databázi Filmový přehled (www.filmovyprehled.cz). Výjimečný distribuční rok 2020 v českých kinech nelze – ať již celkovým množstvím filmových premiér, počtem projekcí, či jejich návštěvností – porovnávat s předcházejícími (a zřejmě ani s následujícími) lety. -
Study of Victim Experiences of Wrongful Conviction
The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Study of Victim Experiences of Wrongful Conviction Author(s): Seri Irazola, Ph.D., Erin Williamson, Julie Stricker, Emily Niedzwiecki Document No.: 244084 Date Received: November 2013 Award Number: GS-23F-8182H This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant report available electronically. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Final Report Study of Victim Experiences of Wrongful Conviction Contract No. GS-23F-8182H September, 2013 Submitted to: National Institute of Justice Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Submitted by: ICF Incorporated 9300 Lee Highway Fairfax, VA 22031 Final Report Study of Victim Experiences of Wrongful Conviction Contract No. GS-23F-8182H September, 2013 Submitted to: National Institute of Justice Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Submitted by: ICF Incorporated 9300 Lee Highway Fairfax, VA 22031 Study of Victim Experiences of Wrongful Conviction Study of Victim Experiences of Wrongful Conviction Seri Irazola, Ph.D. Erin Williamson Julie Stricker Emily Niedzwiecki ICF International 9300 Lee Highway Fairfax, VA 22031-1207 This project was supported by Contract No. GS-23F-8182H, awarded by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S.