Aptitude Tests in the Legal Profession

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Aptitude Tests in the Legal Profession Aptitude Testing and the Legal Profession 6 June 2011 Dr. Chris Dewberry Birkbeck, University of London 1 Acknowledgement: I wish to thank Chris Hutton for his help in compiling information in the section of this report entitled Aptitude Tests Currently Used in the Professional Services Sector, Appendix 3, and Appendix 4. 2 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 6 The Background to this Report ................................................................................................ 12 An Introduction to Aptitude and Aptitude Tests ..................................................................... 13 A Brief History of Psychological Ability Testing ....................................................................... 16 The Origins of Testing .......................................................................................................... 16 The Birth of the Modern Ability Test ................................................................................... 17 The Introduction of Group Testing ...................................................................................... 19 The New Science of Psychological Testing .......................................................................... 20 The Growth of the Ability and Aptitude Testing Industry ................................................... 20 Aptitudes and Ability in the 20th Century ................................................................................ 22 A Single Factor of Cognitive Ability? .................................................................................... 24 Multiple Components of Cognitive Ability? ........................................................................ 24 The Sixty Year Reign of Aptitudes ....................................................................................... 25 Aptitudes and Ability in the 21st Century ................................................................................ 27 The Fall of Aptitudes and the Rise of g ................................................................................ 27 The Importance of Cognitive Ability .................................................................................... 28 Adverse Impact: Sub-Group Differences in g ...................................................................... 32 The Influence of Practice and Coaching on Aptitude Test Results ...................................... 38 The Nature of Aptitude Tests and the Influences on Aptitude Test Results ....................... 38 Criteria for Evaluating Psychometric Tests: Reliability and Validity ........................................ 41 Reliability ............................................................................................................................. 41 Face validity ......................................................................................................................... 42 Construct Validity ................................................................................................................ 43 Content Validity ................................................................................................................... 43 Criterion-related validity ..................................................................................................... 43 Concurrent validity .......................................................................................................... 44 3 Predictive validity ............................................................................................................ 45 Operational and “Corrected” Criterion-Related Validity ..................................................... 45 Incremental Criterion-Related Validity................................................................................ 46 Other Criteria for Evaluating Selection Methods .................................................................... 47 Acceptability ........................................................................................................................ 47 Usability ............................................................................................................................... 47 Generality ............................................................................................................................ 48 Fairness ................................................................................................................................ 48 Adverse impact ................................................................................................................ 49 The four-fifths rule .......................................................................................................... 51 Selection methods and differences in sub-group performance ...................................... 53 Differential Item Functioning .......................................................................................... 54 Utility ................................................................................................................................... 58 Aptitude Tests Currently Used in the Professional Service Sector .......................................... 59 Aptitude Tests in the UK and Ireland .................................................................................. 59 LNAT ................................................................................................................................ 61 Irish Aviation Authority ................................................................................................... 62 NATS ................................................................................................................................ 63 BioMedical Admissions Test (BMAT) ............................................................................... 64 United Kingdom Clinical Aptitude Test (UK CAT) ............................................................ 65 UK Aptitude Tests, Practice, and Coaching ..................................................................... 66 Clinical Problem Solving and Situational Judgement Tests ............................................. 66 Aptitude Tests in North America ......................................................................................... 67 SAT ................................................................................................................................... 67 Medical College Admissions Test (MCAT) ....................................................................... 68 Law Schools Admission Test (LSAT) ................................................................................. 69 The Development of a New Selection Test for Law Students ......................................... 70 4 Conclusions and Recommendations ....................................................................................... 71 Recommended Criteria for Evaluating Ability or Aptitude Tests in the Legal Profession ... 73 Appendix 1: Personnel Selection Methods ............................................................................. 75 Appendix 2: A Brief Introduction to Factor Analysis ............................................................... 79 Background .......................................................................................................................... 79 Factor extraction ................................................................................................................. 80 Factor rotation ..................................................................................................................... 83 Interpreting the results of the analysis ............................................................................... 85 Appendix 3: Examples of Aptitude Tests ................................................................................. 89 American College Test (ACT) ............................................................................................... 92 Armed Forces Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) .......................................................... 92 BioMedical Admissions Test (BMAT) ................................................................................... 93 Dental Admission Test (DAT) ............................................................................................... 94 Differential Aptitude Test (DAT) for Personnel and Career Assessment ............................ 94 Employee Aptitude Survey (EAS) ......................................................................................... 95 Flanagan Aptitude Classification Tests (FACT) .................................................................... 95 General Aptitude Test Battery (GATB) ................................................................................ 97 LNAT .................................................................................................................................... 97 Law School Admission Test (LSAT) ...................................................................................... 98 Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) ........................................................................... 100 Multidimensional Aptitude Battery-II ............................................................................... 101 Professional Aptitudes .....................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • A History of Intelligence Assessment: the Unfinished Tapestry
    From Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests, and Issues, Third Edition. Edited by Dawn P. Flanagan and Patti L. Harrison. Copyright 2012 by The Guilford Press. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 1 A History of Intelligence Assessment The Unfinished Tapestry John D. Wasserman When our intelligence scales have become more accurate and the laws governing IQ changes have been more definitively established it will then be possible to say that there is nothing about an individual as important as his IQ, except possibly his morals; that the greatest educational problem is to determine the kind of education best suited to each IQ level; that the first concern of a nation should be the average IQ of its citizens, and the eugenic and dysgenic influences which are capable of raising or lowering that level; that the great test problem of democracy is how to adjust itself to the large IQ differences which can be demonstrated to exist among the members of any race or nationality group. —LEWIS M. TERMAN (1922b) This bold statement by the author of the first of intelligence and its assessment deservedly elicits Stanford–Binet intelligence scale captures much many strong feelings. of both the promise and the controversy that have Intelligence is arguably the most researched historically surrounded, and that still surround, topic in the history of psychology, and the concept the assessment of intelligence. Intelligence tests of general intelligence has been described as “one of and their applications have been associated with the most central phenomena in all of behavioral some of the very best and very worst human be- science, with broad explanatory powers” (Jensen, haviors.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Life Skills and Aptitude Training
    Life / Communication and Aptitude Training Program The Life/Communication skills and Aptitude training program at Shivalik College of Engineering (SCE) is specially designed for SCE students who are aspiring to develop their professional competencies by sharpening their skills and knowledge. The ability to understand our own self and people better, communicate effectively, to manage interpersonal relationships, to manage meetings, to manage projects, to do a presentation, to lead a team or to solve a dispute among peers, is even more important than all our education or specialized knowledge in one single field. This course teaches and explains the basics of all soft skills and analytical mind that anyone should have in order to achieve personal excellence and accomplishing the goals more easily. The course is structured in several sections. This will be achieved by Interactive simulations, speed & mock tests, games, activities, group discussions, Individual presentations, Role Plays and videos. “All birds find shelter during a rain, but eagle avoids rain by flying above the clouds” — Dr. A.P.J Abdul Kalam Training Department aims at moulding the students so as to meet the industry expectations in career building and in turn bring laurels to the parent institution. The Training department prepares carefully laid down training schedule for the year, along with customized pre-placement training on the campus for various companies before their respective campus drives, and overseeing the process to its end, is the responsibility of the Training department. The department endeavors to carry out successfully all the processes methodically throughout the year. GOALS & OBJECTIVES GOALS • To enhance the employability skills among the students to meet out the corporate expectations.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Aptitude and Achievement Tests: the Curious Case of the Indestructible Strawperson
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Social and Technical Issues in Testing: Buros-Nebraska Series on Measurement and Implications for Test Construction and Usage Testing 1984 7. Aptitude and Achievement Tests: The Curious Case of the Indestructible Strawperson Anne Anastasi Fordham University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/burostestingissues Part of the Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons Anastasi, Anne, "7. Aptitude and Achievement Tests: The Curious Case of the Indestructible Strawperson" (1984). Social and Technical Issues in Testing: Implications for Test Construction and Usage. 9. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/burostestingissues/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Buros-Nebraska Series on Measurement and Testing at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Social and Technical Issues in Testing: Implications for Test Construction and Usage by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in SOCIAL AND TECHNICAL ISSUES IN TESTING: IMPLICATIONS FOR TEST CONSTRUCTION AND USAGE, edited by Barbara S. Plake (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1984). Copyright © 1984 by Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Digital edition copyright © 2012 Buros Center for Testing. Aptitude and Ach ievement Tests: The Curious Case of the I ndestructi ble Strawperson 1 Anne Anastasi Fordham University In a talk I gave at the 1979 ETS Invitational Conference, I remarked that, if I were suddenly endowed with the appropriate occult powers, I should choose to eliminate certain words from the psychometric vocabulary. Among them were the words aptitude and achievement (Anastasi, 1980). These terms have led to nearly as much confusion, misinterpretation, and misuse of tests as has the more notorious term intelligence.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Study of Certain Tests of Mechanical Ability Herbert A
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 1930 A critical study of certain tests of mechanical ability Herbert A. Landry University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Landry, Herbert A., "A critical study of certain tests of mechanical ability" (1930). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 1697. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/1697 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UMASS/AMHERST 312066 0306 7566 2 FIVE COLLEGE DEPOSITORY A Critical Study of Certain Tests of Mechanical Ability Herbert A. Landry I This thesis is not to be loaned outside the library building. For this purpose, use the copy in the department where the work or the thesis was done. 9o(, k critical 3tuby cp cbwmi tests cp stofajical abiiitt BY H*WB*R? A, LAEDRT IWPAOTifTO? 0? AGRICULTURAL SWCATICB THESIS SUBMITTED POH MMHtt CP tttffi OP SCUBfCT. massashuswts agricuitoral nun AHHEPST. MASS. 1 9 3 0. The writer wishes to record here his indebtedness to those persons who have assisted in this study. His greatest obligation is to Professor Harry IT. Glide, who has followed the study with interest and who has offered valuable criticisms and sureestlons. Tb Superintendent John ft* Fausey and " Principal ''illiara A.. Cowing of the West Springfield Schools where the testing was done, he is indebted for their very willing cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Gifted and Talented Identification
    Gifted and Talented Identification Parent Handbook Carol Swalley, Administrator Thompson School District 1 Table of Contents Identification Process • Preface and Rationale • Definition • Types of Gifted • Search/Referral/Nomination/ • Gathering BOE/ Review BOE/ID Process • Program Match • Identification Process Flow Chart • Portability • Collecting a Body of Evidence • Student Profile of Body of Evidence • Types of Assessments • GT determination Types of Gifted • General Intellectual Ability • Specific Academic Aptitude with Cognitive Ability • Specific Academic Aptitude without Cognitive Ablility • Specific Talent including Creative, Leadership, Psychomotor, Visual and Performing Arts, Music Information • Resources • Question and Answer sheet, both English and Spanish • Dispute Resolution Process 2 Preface Like any field, the field of gifted and talented is always growing and changing with new discoveries and insights into the identification and education of gifted children. The following Identification Handbook is meant to be a living document for growth and change over time as new research refines strategies, and active use of forms shows better processes and communications. Its purpose is to assist with bringing consistency in identification practices across the district. Rationale The Exceptional Children’s Education Act (ECEA) requires all administrative units (AUs) in Colorado to identify and serve students between the ages of five and twenty-one, and age four in administrative units with Early Access, whose aptitude or competence in abilities, talents, and potential for accomplishment in one or more domains are so exceptional or developmentally advanced that they require special provisions to meet their educational programming needs. Administrative units include: school districts, Charter School Institute (CSI), multi-district administrative units and Boards of Cooperative Educational Services (BOCES).
    [Show full text]
  • A Single G Factor Is Not Necessary to Simulate Positive Correlations Between Cognitive Tests
    Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology ISSN: 1380-3395 (Print) 1744-411X (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ncen20 A single g factor is not necessary to simulate positive correlations between cognitive tests Dennis J. McFarland To cite this article: Dennis J. McFarland (2012) A single g factor is not necessary to simulate positive correlations between cognitive tests, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 34:4, 378-384, DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2011.645018 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2011.645018 Published online: 20 Jan 2012. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 218 View related articles Citing articles: 2 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ncen20 Download by: [Tufts University] Date: 28 September 2016, At: 08:05 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY 2012, 34 (4), 378–384 A single g factor is not necessary to simulate positive correlations between cognitive tests Dennis J. McFarland Laboratory of Neural Injury and Repair, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA In the area of abilities testing, one issue of continued dissent is whether abilities are best conceptualized as man- ifestations of a single underlying general factor or as reflecting the combination of multiple traits that may be dissociable. The fact that diverse cognitive tests tend to be positively correlated has been taken as evidence for a single general ability or “g” factor. In the present study, simulations of test performance were run to evaluate the hypothesis that multiple independent abilities that affect test performance in a consistent manner will produce a positive manifold.
    [Show full text]
  • What Grades and Achievement Tests Measure
    IZA DP No. 10356 What Grades and Achievement Tests Measure Lex Borghans Bart H.H. Golsteyn James J. Heckman John Eric Humphries November 2016 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute for the Study of Labor What Grades and Achievement Tests Measure Lex Borghans Maastricht University and IZA Bart H.H. Golsteyn Maastricht University and IZA James J. Heckman University of Chicago, American Bar Foundation and IZA John Eric Humphries University of Chicago Discussion Paper No. 10356 November 2016 IZA P.O. Box 7240 53072 Bonn Germany Phone: +49-228-3894-0 Fax: +49-228-3894-180 E-mail: [email protected] Any opinions expressed here are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but the institute itself takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit organization supported by Deutsche Post Foundation. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its international network, workshops and conferences, data service, project support, research visits and doctoral program. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • TEST and ASSESS YOUR BRAIN QUOTIENT Ii
    i TEST AND ASSESS YOUR BRAIN QUOTIENT ii This page is intentionally left blank iii TEST AND ASSESS YOUR BRAIN QUOTIENT Discover your true intelligence with tests of aptitude, logic, memory, EQ, creative and lateral thinking PHILIP CARTER London and Philadelphia iv Publisher’s note Every possible effort has been made to ensure that the information contained in this book is accurate at the time of going to press, and the publishers and author cannot accept responsibility for any errors or omissions, however caused. No responsibility for loss or damage occasioned to any person acting, or refraining from action, as a result of the material in this publication can be accepted by the editor, the publisher or the author. First published in Great Britain and the United States in 2009 by Kogan Page Limited Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, this publication may only be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms and licences issued by the CLA. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside these terms should be sent to the publishers at the undermentioned addresses: 120 Pentonville Road 525 South 4th Street, #241 London N1 9JN Philadelphia PA 19147 United Kingdom USA www.koganpage.com © Philip Carter, 2009 The right of Philip Carter to be identifi ed as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Sex Differences in Mechanical Aptitude: an Investigation of Sex Differences in Mechanical Aptitude and Its Relation to Nonverbal Abilities Karolina E
    University of North Florida UNF Digital Commons All Volumes (2001-2008) The sprO ey Journal of Ideas and Inquiry 2001 Sex Differences in Mechanical Aptitude: An Investigation of Sex Differences in Mechanical Aptitude and Its Relation to Nonverbal Abilities Karolina E. Christensson Ringby University of North Florida Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unf.edu/ojii_volumes Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Suggested Citation Ringby, Karolina E. Christensson, "Sex Differences in Mechanical Aptitude: An Investigation of Sex Differences in Mechanical Aptitude and Its Relation to Nonverbal Abilities" (2001). All Volumes (2001-2008). 132. http://digitalcommons.unf.edu/ojii_volumes/132 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the The sprO ey Journal of Ideas and Inquiry at UNF Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Volumes (2001-2008) by an authorized administrator of UNF Digital Commons. For more information, please contact Digital Projects. © 2001 All Rights Reserved Sex Differences in based on a smaller sample than originally planned. Mechanical Aptitude: An Little research has been conducted Investigation of Sex examining the basis for the reported sex differences in mechanical aptitude. Differences in Mechanical Mechanical aptitude tests are used Aptitude and Its Relation to extensively in selection procedures for Nonverbal Abilities mechanical jobs. A study investigating the validity of two of these measures and Karolina E. Christens son Ringby the differential performance of each sex group on them is quite timely because Faculty Sponsor: Dr. Susana Urbina, more women are seeking employment in Professor of Psychology areas that require mechanical abilities.
    [Show full text]
  • (BTACT) with Stop & Go Switch Task (SGST) Margie E. Lachman, Project
    Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone (BTACT) with Stop & Go Switch Task (SGST) Margie E. Lachman, Project Leader Patricia A. Tun, Co-Investigator Brandeis University MIDUS II Cognitive Test Battery Manual Updated January 2011 Supported by PO1 AG20166 & RO1 AG17920 Table of Contents 1. Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone form A – p. 1-10 2. Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone form B – p. 11-19 3. BTACT form A answer sheet – p. 20-27 4. BTACT form B answer sheet – p. 28-35 5. Guidelines for Administering and Scoring the BTACT – p. 36-40 6. Options for Administration and Scoring of the Stop and Go Switch Task – p. 41-47 7. Information about Recording and Administering the BTACT and Stop and Go Switch Task – p. 48 8. Information about Automatic Scoring of the Stop and Go Swich Task – p. 49 9. BTACT References – p. 50 MIDUS II Cognitive Test Battery Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone (BTACT) February 2012 For Website In this phone interview I will ask you to try and do some exercises that involve remembering and making judgments about words and numbers. Before we begin, I need to tell you a few things. Your participation is completely voluntary. If you prefer not to answer any question, just let me know and we will go on to the next question. The information that you give me will be confidential and used for statistical analysis only. It will be identified only by computer code and at no time will your name or other identifying information be attached to the survey results.
    [Show full text]
  • Cognition in MS: an Overview
    Cognition in MS: An Overview John DeLuca, Ph.D. Senior Vice President for Research Kessler Foundation West Orange, New Jersey, USA Professor, Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Department of Neurology Rutgers, New Jersey Medical School Newark, New Jersey, USA Disclosures • Advisory board for Biogen IDEC • Speaker, Sanofi - Genzyme • Grant funding, Biogen IDEC • Grant funding, EMD Serono • Grant funding, NMSS • Grant funding, CMSC Overview • Cognition in MS – impact on daily life – assessment – brain imaging parameters • Cognitive Rehabilitation • Exercise and Medication • Conclusions Charcot (1868) Cognitive experience of patients with MS : “a marked enfeeblement of the memory; conceptions are formed slowly …” MS - Historical • By 1960’s, medical students taught – cognitive change not characteristic of MS • Early 1970’s: cognitive impairment in about 3% • Today, cognitive impairments up to 65% in MS Cognitive Deficits in MS • Information processing speed/ efficiency • Learning and Memory • Executive functions • planning, organization, initiation • Perceptual processing Cognitive Impairment in MS 60 50 40 30 20 percent impaired 10 0 cognitive domain Chiaravalloti & DeLuca, 2008, Lancet Neurol The frequency of cognitive impairment tends to increase over MS course Adapted from Ruano et al (2017), MSJ Examine MS symptoms prior to clinical onset (or dx) Prospectively investigate potential signs of preclinical MS activity Cognitive performance of all Norwegian men born 1950-1995 who underwent conscription between 18-19yo Linked
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Mechanical Aptitude, Prior Experiences, and Engineering Attitude for Male and Female Mechanical Engineering Students
    AC 2011-701: COMPARISON OF MECHANICAL APTITUDE, PRIOR EX- PERIENCES, AND ENGINEERING ATTITUDE FOR MALE AND FEMALE MECHANICAL ENGINEERING STUDENTS Michele Miller, Michigan Technological University Dr. Michele Miller is an Associate Professor in mechanical engineering. She teaches classes on manufac- turing and human factors and does disciplinary research on microelectromechanical systems and precision machining. Her educational research interests include problem solving in the lab and informal engineering education. Anna Pereira, University of California, Berkeley Benjamin Mitchell, Michigan Technological University Page 22.352.1 Page c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Comparison of Mechanical Aptitude, Prior Experiences, and Engineering Attitude for Male and Female Mechanical Engineering Students Abstract We investigated ways to measure mechanical aptitude, including: a paper and pencil mechanical aptitude test (MAT), rating of expertise based observation of students doing hands- on tasks, and performance on physics computer games. Male students scored higher then female students on the MAT and physics games at statistically significant levels. Students also completed prior experience and engineering attitude questionnaires. We examined correlations between prior experiences and MAT performance and found activities such as operating machinery, repairing equipment, and using tools to correlate most highly. The prior experience results showed that male students spent many more hours engaging in the activities with the strongest correlations to MAT performance. The attitude survey included questions relating to confidence and enjoyment of figuring out how things work and troubleshooting. Based on the results, the male students had more confidence and enjoyment than female students at statistically significant levels. Introduction The representation of women in engineering is quite low relative to other previously male- dominated professions such as law and medicine.
    [Show full text]