Collembola: Actors of Soil Life
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Unexpected Diversity in Neelipleona Revealed by Molecular Phylogeny Approach (Hexapoda, Collembola)
S O I L O R G A N I S M S Volume 83 (3) 2011 pp. 383–398 ISSN: 1864-6417 Unexpected diversity in Neelipleona revealed by molecular phylogeny approach (Hexapoda, Collembola) Clément Schneider1, 3, Corinne Cruaud2 and Cyrille A. D’Haese1 1 UMR7205 CNRS, Département Systématique et Évolution, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, CP50 Entomology, 45 rue Buffon, 75231 Paris cedex 05, France 2 Genoscope, Centre National de Sequençage, 2 rue G. Crémieux, CP5706, 91057 Evry cedex, France 3 Corresponding author: Clément Schneider (email: [email protected]) Abstract Neelipleona are the smallest of the four Collembola orders in term of species number with 35 species described worldwide (out of around 8000 known Collembola). Despite this apparent poor diversity, Neelipleona have a worldwide repartition. The fact that the most commonly observed species, Neelus murinus Folsom, 1896 and Megalothorax minimus Willem, 1900, display cosmopolitan repartition is striking. A cladistic analysis based on 16S rDNA, COX1 and 28S rDNA D1 and D2 regions, for a broad collembolan sampling was performed. This analysis included 24 representatives of the Neelipleona genera Neelus Folsom, 1896 and Megalothorax Willem, 1900 from various regions. The interpretation of the phylogenetic pattern and number of transformations (branch length) indicates that Neelipleona are more diverse than previously thought, with probably many species yet to be discovered. These results buttress the rank of Neelipleona as a whole order instead of a Symphypleona family. Keywords: Collembola, Neelidae, Megalothorax, Neelus, COX1, 16S, 28S 1. Introduction 1.1. Brief history of Neelipleona classification The Neelidae family was established by Folsom (1896), who described Neelus murinus from Cambridge (USA). -
Why Are There So Many Exotic Springtails in Australia? a Review
90 (3) · December 2018 pp. 141–156 Why are there so many exotic Springtails in Australia? A review. Penelope Greenslade1, 2 1 Environmental Management, School of School of Health and Life Sciences, Federation University, Ballarat, Victoria 3353, Australia 2 Department of Biology, Australian National University, GPO Box, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia E-mail: [email protected] Received 17 October 2018 | Accepted 23 November 2018 Published online at www.soil-organisms.de 1 December 2018 | Printed version 15 December 2018 DOI 10.25674/y9tz-1d49 Abstract Native invertebrate assemblages in Australia are adversely impacted by invasive exotic plants because they are replaced by exotic, invasive invertebrates. The reasons have remained obscure. The different physical, chemical and biotic characteristics of the novel habitat seem to present hostile conditions for native species. This results in empty niches. It seems the different ecologies of exotic invertebrate species may be better adapted to colonise these novel empty niches than native invertebrates. Native faunas of other southern continents that possess a highly endemic fauna, such as South America, South Africa and New Zealand, may have suffered the same impacts from exotic species but insufficient survey data and unreliable and old taxonomy makes this uncertain. Here I attempt to discover what particular characteristics of these novel habitats are hostile to native invertebrates. I chose the Collembola as a target taxon. They are a suitable group because the Australian collembolan fauna consists of a high percentage of endemic taxa, but also exotic, non-native, species. Most exotic Collembola species in Australia appear to have originated from Europe, where they occur at low densities (Fjellberg 1997, 2007). -
First Record of the Genus Spinaethorax Papáč & Palacios-Vargas, 2016 (Collembola, Neelipleona, Neelidae) in Asia, with a New Species from a Vietnamese Cave
European Journal of Taxonomy 363: 1–20 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2017.363 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2017 · Schneider C. & Deharveng L. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Research article urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5720CF48-37A8-4814-93F3-192493488435 First record of the genus Spinaethorax Papáč & Palacios-Vargas, 2016 (Collembola, Neelipleona, Neelidae) in Asia, with a new species from a Vietnamese cave Clément SCHNEIDER 1,* & Louis DEHARVENG 2 1 Mécanismes Adaptatifs & Evolution, MECADEV - UMR 7179 - CNRS, MNHN, Dpt Systematics & Evolution, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, CP50 Entomology, 45 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France. 2 Institut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité, ISYEB – UMR 7205 – CNRS, MNHN, UPMC, EPHE, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Sorbonne Universités, 57 rue Cuvier, CP 50, 75005 Paris, France. *Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:C0BEC337-0235-4E4B-8EFB-134B3EED1B90 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:D8F5C679-C30C-442C-8621-D3B8EDB17EF7 Abstract. A new species of the genus Spinaethorax Papáč & Palacios-Vargas, 2016, recently erected for two cave species of Mexico, is described from a Vietnamese cave. It differs from the Mexican species most noticeably by the dorsal chaetotaxy of the head (number and morphology of chaetae), the shape of S-chaetae on the third antennomere, the dorsal chaetotaxy of the abdomen and the chaetotaxy of the dens. The pattern of special τ-chaetae is described for the first time in the genus. The affinities between Spinaethorax and the other genera of Neelipleona are discussed. -
Por Que Devemos Nos Importar Com Os Colêmbolos Edáficos?
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Biblioteca Digital de Periódicos da UFPR (Universidade Federal do Paraná) REVISTA SCIENTIA AGRARIA Versão On-line ISSN 1983-2443 Versão Impressa ISSN 1519-1125 SA vol. 17 n°. 2 Curitiba abril/maio. 2016 p. 21-40 POR QUE DEVEMOS NOS IMPORTAR COM OS COLÊMBOLOS EDÁFICOS? Why should we care about edaphic springtails? Luís Carlos Iuñes Oliveira Filho¹*, Dilmar Baretta² 1. Professor do curso de Agronomia da Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (Unoesc), Campus Xanxerê - SC, E-mail: [email protected] (*autor para correspondência). 2. Professor do curso de Zootecnia da Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC Oeste), Campus Chapecó - SC. Bolsista em Produtividade Científica CNPq. E-mail: [email protected] Artigo enviado em 26/08/2016, aceito em 03/10/2016 e publicado em 20/12/2016. RESUMO: Este trabalho de revisão tem como objetivo apresentar a importância dos colêmbolos edáficos, com destaque para aspectos agronômicos e ecológicos. São abordadas as características gerais, densidade e distribuição dos colêmbolos, bem como a relação dos colêmbolos com práticas agrícolas, com fungos, com ciclagem de nutrientes e fertilidade do solo. São também reportados trabalhos da literatura, demonstrando a importância desses organismos aos serviços do ecossistema, como ciclagem de nutrientes, melhoria na fertilidade, agregação do solo, controle de fungos e indicadores da qualidade do solo. Pretende-se com este trabalho demonstrar o importante papel desempenhado pelos colêmbolos e expandir o campo de pesquisa com esses organismos, aumentando o conhecimento dos importantes processos mediados por eles e a interface entre a Ecologia do Solo e Ciência do Solo. -
Collembola of Canada 187 Doi: 10.3897/Zookeys.819.23653 REVIEW ARTICLE Launched to Accelerate Biodiversity Research
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 819: 187–195 (2019) Collembola of Canada 187 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.819.23653 REVIEW ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Collembola of Canada Matthew S. Turnbull1, Sophya Stebaeva2 1 Unaffiliated, Kingston, Ontario, Canada2 The Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Aca- demy of Sciences, Leninskii pr. 33, Moscow 119071, Russia Corresponding author: Matthew S. Turnbull ([email protected]) Academic editor: D. Langor | Received 16 January 2018 | Accepted 8 May 2018 | Published 24 January 2019 http://zoobank.org/3A331779-19A1-41DA-AFCF-81AAD4CB049F Citation: Turnbull MS, Stebaeva S (2019) Collembola of Canada. In: Langor DW, Sheffield CS (Eds) The Biota of Canada – A Biodiversity Assessment. Part 1: The Terrestrial Arthropods. ZooKeys 819: 187–195.https://doi. org/10.3897/zookeys.819.23653 Abstract The state of knowledge of diversity of Collembola in Canada was assessed by examination of literature and DNA barcode data. There are 474 described extant Collembola species known from Canada, a significant change compared to the 520 species estimated to occur in Canada in 1979 (Richards 1979) and the 341 reported in the most recent national checklist (Skidmore 1993). Given the number of indeterminate or cryptic species records, the dearth of sampling in many regions, and the growing use of genetic biodiversity assessment methods such as Barcode Index Numbers, we estimate the total diversity of Collembola in Canada to be approximately 675 species. Advances in Collembola systematics and Canadian research are discussed. Keywords biodiversity assessment, Biota of Canada, Collembola, springtails Collembola, commonly known as springtails, is a class of small, entognathous, wing- less hexapods that is a sister group to Insecta. -
ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000). -
(Collembola) in Meadows, Pastures and Road Verges in Central Finland
© Entomologica Fennica. 29 August 2017 Springtails (Collembola) in meadows, pastures and road verges in Central Finland Atte Komonen* & Saana Kataja-aho Komonen, A. & Kataja-aho, S. 2017: Springtails (Collembola) in meadows, pas- tures and road verges in Central Finland. — Entomol. Fennica 28: 157–163. Understanding of species distribution, abundance and habitat affinities is crucial for red-list assessment, conservation and habitat management. In Central Fin- land, we studied Collembola in three habitat types, namely non-grazed meadows, pastures and road verges using pitfall traps. Altogether, 9,630 Collembola indi- viduals were recorded. These belonged to 12 families, 34 genera and 60 species. The number of specimens was clearly higher in meadows than in pastures or road verges. The number of species, however, was higher in meadows and road verges (40 and 39 species, respectively) than in pastures (33 species). The overall spe- cies number is comparable to other large-scale sampling schemes in similar habi- tats. We recorded a few abundant species (Spatulosminthurus flaviceps, Smin- thurus viridis and Sminthurus nigromaculatus) that have been previously re- corded from very different biotopes. In conclusion, biodiversity inventories of soil fauna, as well as other biota, should also include marginal habitats, which of- ten host peculiar communities. A. Komonen, University of Jyväskylä, Department of Biological and Environ- mental Science, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 University of Jyväskylä, Finland; *Cor- responding author’s e-mail: [email protected] S. Kataja-aho, University of Jyväskylä, Natural History Museum, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 University of Jyväskylä, Finland; E-mail: [email protected] Received 15 November 2016, accepted 22 December 2016 1. -
Collembola (Springtails, Collembolans)
chapter 6 Collembola (springtails, collembolans) Arne Fjellberg The Collembola (springtails) are one of the dominant ani- three thoracic segments bears a leg consisting of claw, mal groups in most soil ecosystems including those of the tibiotarsus, femur, trochanter, coxa and subcoxa. Some of arctic regions. Their unique body design with the low the six abdominal segments have structures derived from number of abdominal segments render them immedi- paired appendages: Ventral tube on the first segment, ately recognizable among the antennate hexapod arthro- retinaculum on the third, and furca (the jumping organ) pods. Their exact phylogenetic relationships to other on the fourth. Genital organs open on the fifth and anus arthropods are currently a subject of much discussion, see on the sixth (terminal) segment. The genital aperture of chapter 2. the female is a transverse slit with an anterior and a poste- rior lip, the male aperture is a roundish papilla with an incision from behind Fig.1 shows the general morphology Morphology of the Greenland species Hypogastrura concolor. For a more detailed description Fjellberg (1998) may be Collembola are enthognathous hexapod arthropods, i.e., consulted. their mandibles and maxillae are enclosed in the head Abbreviations used in the text (see also Fig.1). a: Anterior; capsule. Most species are 0.5–1.5 mm long, with some spe- A: Apical setae of tibiotarsus; abd.: Abdomen (abd.1: First cies reaching more than 3 mm.The antennae are 4–seg- abdominal segment); ant: Antenna (ant.1: First antennal mented, the eye-field has 8 socalled ‘ocelli’ (dispersed segment); cl: Claw; m: Median; M: Macrochaeta; ms: compound eye ommatidia, hence non-homologous with Spine-like microsensillum; p: Posterior; PAO: Post anten- insect ocelli) which often become reduced. -
First Survey of Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) Fauna in Soil of Archipelago Fernando De Noronha, Brazil Estevam C
First survey of Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) fauna in soil of Archipelago Fernando de Noronha, Brazil Estevam C. Araujo De Lima1, * and Douglas Zeppelini1,2, Collembola (Hexapoda: Entognatha) is one of the most abundant Table 1. Collembola recorded on the Fernando de Noronha archipelago, Brazil. and widely distributed taxa among terrestrial Hexapoda (Hopkin 1997). Collection localites were: a sandy beach (SB), soil on the slope of a cliff (SC) and the Soil in the forest at the hilltop (SF). World distribution was summarized for Collembola specimens are found in almost all habitats, excluding each species as follows: Boreal (Bor) include regions 1–8, Neotropical (Neo) re- aquatic environments below the surface firm where their occurrence is gions 24–30, South African (Saf) region 31, Paleotropical (Pal) regions 9–23, Aus- rare or accidental. The greatest diversity and abundance of these spe- tralian (Aus) regions 32–34, and Antarctic (Ant) regions 35–37. Species distributed cies occurs in soil and in adjacent microhabitats, especially where there in at least, in 4 of the major regions (Neo, Pal, etc.) are considered to be cosmo- is much organic matter (Zeppelini et al. 2008). The potential value of politan (Cos). Species distribution restricted to Northeast and Central Brazil (NCB), restricted to Fernando de Noronha (RFN) and doubtful distribution Record (?). Collembola as biological indicators of soil health and ecosystem quality is increasingly recognized and therefore knowledge of the diversity of Localities Collembola becomes useful in the development of conservation strate- World gies and environmental monitoring (Stork & Eggleton 1992; Zeppelini Taxa SB SC SF distribution et al. -
Four New Troglobiotic Species of the Genus Megalothorax Willem, 1900 (Collembola: Neelipleona) from the Carpathian Mountains (Slovakia, Romania)
Zootaxa 3737 (5): 545–575 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3737.5.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9DF408C6-BC6D-4D4E-BCDE-26E103D4E634 Four new troglobiotic species of the genus Megalothorax Willem, 1900 (Collembola: Neelipleona) from the Carpathian Mountains (Slovakia, Romania) VLADIMÍR PAPÁČ1 & ĽUBOMÍR KOVÁČ2 1 State Nature Conservancy, Slovak Caves Administration, Železničná 31, 979 01 Rimavská Sobota, Slovak Republic. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Institute of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, P. J. Šafárik University, Moyzesova 11, 040 01 Košice, Slovak Republic. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Four new species of Megalothorax Willem, 1900 are described and illustrated: M. tatrensis sp. nov., M. carpaticus sp. nov., M. hipmani sp. nov. from caves in Slovakia and M. draco sp. nov. from the Drǎcoaia Cave in western Romania. The species represent troglobiotic forms exhibiting different level of troglomorphy involving such features as larger body, elongated foot complex, antennae, mucro and body chaetae. The most pronounced troglomorphy is observed in M. hipmani sp. nov. and M. draco sp. nov. Species descriptions are completed with comparative tables of chaetotaxy of antennae and legs. Diagnostic table for all congeners and dichotomous identification key to the world species are provided. Distribution records of other Megalothorax species in Slovakia are added. Key words: cave fauna, troglomorphy, endemism, identification key Introduction Family Neelidae, established by Folsom in 1896, represents one of the less diverse collembolan taxon with 33 species distributed in five genera (Janssens & Christiansen 2011). -
Mesofauna – Collembola
Mesofauna – Collembola Morphology Microhabitat Diversity, abundance and biomass Collembola are small (0.12 - 17 mm) wingless hexapods (with six Collembola vary in their habitat preferences. Entomobryomorpha There are around 8 500 described species, which are found in a legs – see page 31) commonly known as ‘springtails’. The scientific and Symphypleona are mainly epiedaphic, living in surface litter great variety of habitats, from Antarctica and the Subantarctic name, Collembola, derives from the Greek words kolla (meaning and emergent vegetation, and are fast movers and good jumpers, Islands to rainforests, warm beaches and deserts. As well as being ‘glue’) and embolon (meaning ‘piston’) and was initially proposed in whereas the slow-moving Poduromorpha and Neelipleona are widespread, they are the most abundant hexapods in the world, reference to the ventral tube (collophore), which plays an important mainly within-soil dwellers (euedaphic). Most Collembola feed and an average square metre of soil in a temperate grassland or role in their fluid and electrolyte balance and may also serve as on fungal hyphae and spores (see box, page 39), bacteria (see a woodland can yield as many as 40 000 individuals. a ‘glue piston’ for adhering to smooth surfaces or for grooming. pages 33-35) and decaying plant material. However, ssome Another characteristic, albeit not always present, gives them their species are predators, feeding on nematodes (see pages 46- Generally, habitats may support anything from two to 30 common name: the forked springing organ or ‘furca’. This is held 47) or on other Collembola and their eggs. Ecologically, they are different collembolan species. However, in the tropics, up to 150 by a special catch mechanism on the ventral side of their abdomen not as important as earthworms in decomposition processes, species can be found, if species present in epiphytes (plants living which, when released, acts as a spring that can propel them, within but are still responsible for up to 30 % of total soil invertebrate in trees) are taken into account. -
Fossil Calibrations for the Arthropod Tree of Life
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/044859; this version posted June 10, 2016. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. FOSSIL CALIBRATIONS FOR THE ARTHROPOD TREE OF LIFE AUTHORS Joanna M. Wolfe1*, Allison C. Daley2,3, David A. Legg3, Gregory D. Edgecombe4 1 Department of Earth, Atmospheric & Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 2 Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK 3 Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PZ, UK 4 Department of Earth Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK *Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Fossil age data and molecular sequences are increasingly combined to establish a timescale for the Tree of Life. Arthropods, as the most species-rich and morphologically disparate animal phylum, have received substantial attention, particularly with regard to questions such as the timing of habitat shifts (e.g. terrestrialisation), genome evolution (e.g. gene family duplication and functional evolution), origins of novel characters and behaviours (e.g. wings and flight, venom, silk), biogeography, rate of diversification (e.g. Cambrian explosion, insect coevolution with angiosperms, evolution of crab body plans), and the evolution of arthropod microbiomes. We present herein a series of rigorously vetted calibration fossils for arthropod evolutionary history, taking into account recently published guidelines for best practice in fossil calibration.